Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

OM System OM-1 Mark II Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£1,850Sensor size:four thirdsWeight:599 gBattery life (CIPA):500 shots

OM System OM-1 Mark II Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

8.8

Overall score

Score
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

8.8

Technical score

10%

?

User score

★Better than 97% of cameras
8.8

Technical score

Technical score
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

7.9

Sensor & Image

25%

9.9

Photo Features

18%

8.8

Video & Audio

14%

8.2

Display & Design

8%

9.6

Battery & Power

7%

8.9

Connectivity & Storage

★Better than 97% of cameras
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera OM System OM-1 Mark II

Technical score
Technical score
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

7.9

Sensor & Image

25%

9.9

Photo Features

18%

8.8

Video & Audio

14%

8.2

Display & Design

8%

9.6

Battery & Power

7%

8.9

Connectivity & Storage

8.8
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
OM System OM-1 Mark II has a popularity score of 1, which is lower than 51.3% of cameras.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

8.8

Overall score

40%

1.0

Price

6.5
Sensor size
four thirds
Sensor size
four thirds
This camera uses a sensor classified as four thirds; it is larger than the sensor in 49% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 8.1% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
20.4 MP
Main camera megapixels
20.4 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 20.4 MP, which is higher than that of 71.7% of cameras and equal to that of 1.6% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
3.34 µm
Main camera pixel size
3.34 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 3.34 µm, which are larger than those in 49.8% of cameras and the same size as those in 2% of cameras.
Base ISO
200
Base ISO
200
This camera has a base ISO of 200 which is higher than that of 84.7% of cameras and equal to that of 13.9% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 102400 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 102,400
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 102,400, which is higher than that of 97.5% of cameras and equal to that of 1.8% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
Micro Four Thirds
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
1,053
N. of focus points
1,053
This camera has 1,053 focus points, more than the number offered by 97.9% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 0.2% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
yes
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
yes
This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.3% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
AF tracking
yes
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 88% of cameras.
Show more
Max video resolution
3,840 px
Max video resolution
3,840 px
This camera supports 3,840 px video recording which is higher quality than that of 76% of cameras and equal to that of 19.2% of cameras.
Video bitrate
202 Mbps
Video bitrate
202 Mbps
This camera has a video bitrate of 202 Mbps which is higher than that of 89.4% of cameras and equal to that of 0.1% of cameras.
Video bit depth
10 bit
Video bit depth
10 bit
This camera supports video at 10 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 88.5% of cameras and equal to that of 7.4% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:2
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:2
This camera supports 4:2:2 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 77.9% of cameras and equal to that of 22.1% of cameras.
HDMI
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, ProRes RAW
Show more
Type
mirrorless
Weight
599 g
Weight
599 g
This camera weighs 599 g which is heavier than 73.3% of cameras and equal to the weight of 0.5% of cameras.
Width
138.8 mm
Width
138.8 mm
This camera has a width of 138.8 mm which is wider than 85.8% of cameras.
Height
91.6 mm
Height
91.6 mm
This camera has a height of 91.6 mm which is taller than 69.2% of cameras and equal to that of 0.1% of cameras.
Thickness
72.7 mm
Thickness
72.7 mm
This camera has a thickness of 72.7 mm which is thicker than 66.1% of cameras and equal to that of 0.1% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
500 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
500 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 500 shots, which is longer than that of 79.1% of cameras and equal to that of 3.6% of cameras.
Battery capacity
2,280 mAh
Battery capacity
2,280 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 2,280 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 92.6% of cameras and equal to those in 3.4% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
yes
USB Power Delivery (PD)
yes
This camera supports USB Power Delivery. 10% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This camera supports Wi-Fi. This feature is available on 47.8% of cameras.
802.11a/b/g/n/ac
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
This camera uses Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac) which is newer than that of 89.9% of cameras and equal to that of 9.6% of cameras.
Bluetooth connectivity
yes
Bluetooth connectivity
yes
This camera has Bluetooth. 22.6% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth 4.2.
Bluetooth version
4.2
Bluetooth version
4.2
This camera supports Bluetooth version 4.2 which is newer than that supported by 86.3% of cameras and equal to that of 9.6% of cameras.
USB Type-C
yes
USB Type-C
yes
This camera features USB Type-C. 14.5% of cameras use USB-C ports.
Supports Power Delivery.
Show more

OM System OM-1 Mark II vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • 1,030 more AF points
    N. of focus points
    1,053
    This camera has more focus points than the average camera (1,053 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    1,053 vs 23
  • In-body stabilization
    Sensor-shift stabilization
    yes
    This camera supports in-body stabilization, the average camera does not.
  • Phase-detect AF for photos
    Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
    yes
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos, the average camera does not.
  • 96,000 ISO higher maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    102,400 ISO
    This camera has a higher maximum sensitivity than the average camera (102400 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    102,400 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • 4.5 stops more CIPA-rated stabilization
    Image stabilization rating (CIPA)
    8.5 stops
    This camera offers more CIPA-rated stabilization than the average camera (8.5 stops vs 4 stops). The average camera reaches 4 stops.
    8.5 stops vs 4 stops
  • 172 Mbps higher video bitrate
    Video bitrate
    202 Mbps
    This camera has a higher video bitrate than the average camera (202 Mbps vs 30 Mbps). The average camera records at 30 Mbps.
    202 Mbps vs 30 Mbps
  • Human eye AF
    Eye detection AF (human)
    yes
    This camera supports human eye-detection AF, the average camera does not.
  • Dual card slots
    Dual card slots
    yes
    This camera offers dual card slots, the average camera does not. 13.3% of cameras offer them.
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    electronic
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (electronic vs none).
    electronic vs none
  • 3400000 dots higher EVF resolution
    EVF resolution
    5,760,000 dots
    This camera has a higher EVF resolution than the average camera (5760000 dots vs 2360000 dots). The average camera has an EVF resolution of 2360000 dots.
    5760000 dots vs 2360000 dots
  • Fully articulated screen
    Flip-out screen
    yes
    This camera has a fully articulated screen, the average camera does not.
  • Has a touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    This camera has a touchscreen, the average camera does not. 36.6% of cameras support touchscreen input.
  • 60 Hz higher EVF refresh rate
    Max EVF refresh rate
    120 Hz
    This camera has a higher EVF refresh rate than the average camera (120 Hz vs 60 Hz). The average camera has an EVF refresh rate of 60 Hz.
    120 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • 0.05 x more viewfinder magnification
    Viewfinder magnification
    0.83 x
    This camera has a higher viewfinder magnification than the average camera (0.8 x vs 0.78 x). The average camera has a viewfinder magnification of 0.78 x.
    0.83 x vs 0.78 x
  • 96,000 ISO higher maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    102,400 ISO
    This camera has a higher maximum sensitivity than the average camera (102400 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    102,400 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • Uses a BSI sensor
    BSI sensor
    yes
    This camera uses a BSI sensor, the average camera does not. 34.8% of cameras use a BSI sensor.
  • Stacked CMOS sensor
    Stacked CMOS sensor
    yes
    This camera uses a stacked CMOS sensor, the average camera does not.
    Stacked BSI sensor.
  • Sensor cleaning system
    Sensor cleaning system
    yes
    This camera includes a sensor cleaning system, the average camera does not.
    Supersonic Wave Filter.
  • 11 newer
    Release date
    2024
    This camera is newer than the average camera (2024 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    February 2024
    2,024 vs 2,013
  • Higher sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    20.4 MP
    This camera has a higher sensor resolution than the average camera (20.4 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    20.4 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 1.2 points higher DxOMark Landscape score
    DxOMark landscape score
    13.6 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark landscape score than the average camera (13.6 points vs 12.4 points). The average camera scores 12.4 points.
    13.6 points vs 12.4 points
  • 7 points higher DxOMark sensor score
    DxOMark sensor score
    80 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark sensor score than the average camera (80 points vs 73 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sensor score of 73 points.
    80 points vs 73 points
  • 100 higher base ISO
    Base ISO
    200
    This camera has a higher base ISO than the average camera (200 vs 100). The average camera has a base ISO of 100.
    200 vs 100
  • 1,030 more AF points
    N. of focus points
    1,053
    This camera has more focus points than the average camera (1,053 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    1,053 vs 23
  • In-body stabilization
    Sensor-shift stabilization
    yes
    This camera supports in-body stabilization, the average camera does not.
  • Phase-detect AF for photos
    Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
    yes
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos, the average camera does not.
  • 4.5 stops more CIPA-rated stabilization
    Image stabilization rating (CIPA)
    8.5 stops
    This camera offers more CIPA-rated stabilization than the average camera (8.5 stops vs 4 stops). The average camera reaches 4 stops.
    8.5 stops vs 4 stops
  • Human eye AF
    Eye detection AF (human)
    yes
    This camera supports human eye-detection AF, the average camera does not.
  • Combined stabilization
    Combined image stabilization
    yes
    This camera supports combined stabilization, the average camera does not.
    Sync IS supported.
  • Animal eye AF
    Eye detection AF (animal)
    yes
    This camera supports animal eye-detection AF, the average camera does not.
  • 4.3 fps faster mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    10 fps
    This camera has a faster mechanical burst than the average camera (10 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    10 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 1,770 s longer maximum exposure
    Longest shutter speed
    1,800 s
    This camera supports a longer maximum exposure than the average camera (1800 s s vs 30 s s). The average camera supports a longest shutter speed of 30 s s.
    1,800 s vs 30 s
  • Better low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    -8
    This camera has a better low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (-8 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    Rated at f/1.2 lens sensitivity.
    -8 vs -4
  • 300,000 more shutter cycles
    Shutter durability rating
    400,000
    This camera has a higher shutter durability than the average camera (400,000 vs 100,000). The average camera is rated for 100,000 shutter cycles.
    400,000 vs 100,000
  • Lossless compressed RAW
    Lossless compressed RAW
    yes
    This camera supports lossless compressed RAW, while the average camera does not.
    Lossless RAW capture is supported.
  • Supports touch autofocus
    Touch autofocus
    yes
    This camera supports touch autofocus, the average camera does not. 34.9% of cameras support touch autofocus.
  • Pixel shift shooting
    Pixel shift shot
    yes
    This camera supports pixel shift shooting, the average camera does not.
    Up to 80 MP high-resolution mode.
  • Supports focus bracketing
    Focus bracketing
    yes
    This camera supports focus bracketing, the average camera does not.
    Automatic multi-shot focus bracketing available.
  • Has anti-flicker mode
    Anti-flicker mode
    yes
    This camera includes an anti-flicker mode, the average camera does not. 20% of cameras include it.
  • 172 Mbps higher video bitrate
    Video bitrate
    202 Mbps
    This camera has a higher video bitrate than the average camera (202 Mbps vs 30 Mbps). The average camera records at 30 Mbps.
    202 Mbps vs 30 Mbps
  • Includes headphone output
    Headphone output
    yes
    This camera includes a headphone output, the average camera does not.
  • Has microphone input
    Microphone input
    yes
    This camera has microphone input, the average camera does not.
  • Higher video resolution
    Max video resolution
    3,840 px
    This camera records higher-resolution video than the average camera (3840 px vs 1920 px). The average camera records at 1920 px.
    3840 px vs 1920 px
  • Supports slow-motion video
    Slow-motion video
    yes
    This camera supports slow-motion video, the average camera does not.
    Supports up to 240 fps high-speed video.
  • More complete chroma subsampling
    Video chroma subsampling
    4:2:2
    This camera supports better video chroma subsampling than the average camera (4:2:2 vs 4:2:0). The average camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling.
    HDMI
    4:2:2 vs 4:2:0
  • Phase-detect AF in video
    Phase-detection autofocus (video)
    yes
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus in video, the average camera does not.
  • Higher video color depth
    Video bit depth
    10 bit
    This camera supports a higher video bit depth than the average camera (10 bit vs 8 bit). The average camera supports video at 8 bit.
    10 bit vs 8 bit
  • Supports timecode
    Timecode support
    yes
    This camera supports timecode, the average camera does not.
    Bluetooth/USB sync.
  • Clean HDMI output
    Clean HDMI output
    yes
    This camera offers clean HDMI output, the average camera does not.
  • Supports live streaming
    Live streaming (first-party)
    yes
    This camera supports live streaming, the average camera does not.
    USB webcam/UVC.
  • Supports log profiles
    Log profile support
    yes
    This camera supports log profiles, the average camera does not.
    OM-Log400
  • Built-in timelapse
    Timelapse function
    yes
    This camera includes timelapse capture, the average camera does not.
    Up to 999 shots
  • Supports 24p cinema mode
    24p cinema mode
    yes
    This camera supports 24p cinema mode, the average camera does not. 44% of cameras support this mode.
  • 1,160 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    2,280 mAh
    This camera has a higher battery capacity than the average camera (2280 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    2,280 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • 170 shots more shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    500 shots
    This camera has longer battery life than the average camera (500 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    500 shots vs 330 shots
  • USB Power Delivery
    USB Power Delivery (PD)
    yes
    This camera supports USB Power Delivery, the average camera does not.
  • Dual card slots
    Dual card slots
    yes
    This camera offers dual card slots, the average camera does not. 13.3% of cameras offer them.
  • Has USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    yes
    This camera has a USB Type-C port, the average camera does not. 14.5% of cameras use USB-C.
    Supports Power Delivery.
  • Has Bluetooth
    Bluetooth connectivity
    yes
    This camera supports Bluetooth, the average camera does not. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
    Bluetooth 4.2.
  • Supports Wi-Fi connectivity
    Wi-Fi connectivity
    yes
    This camera supports Wi-Fi, the average camera does not. 47.8% of cameras support Wi-Fi.
    802.11a/b/g/n/ac
  • Smartphone remote control
    Smartphone remote control
    yes
    This camera supports smartphone remote control, the average camera does not. 46.2% of cameras support smartphone remote control.
  • Newer USB version
    USB version
    USB 3.2 Gen 1
    This camera supports a newer USB version than the average camera (USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2). The average camera uses USB 2.0.
    USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2.0
  • Newer HDMI version
    HDMI version
    2.0
    This camera uses HDMI 2, while the average camera uses HDMI 1.4.
    2.0 vs 1.4
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    14-bit in High Res Shot modes.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    four thirds
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (four thirds vs APS-C).
    four thirds vs APS-C
  • 204 g heavier
    Weight
    599 g
    This camera is heavier than the average camera (599 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    599 g vs 395 g
  • No flash
    Flash
    no
    This camera does not have a built-in flash, the average camera does. 73.4% of cameras have a flash.
    Bundled external flash, not built in.
  • 6.38x more expensive
    OM System OM-1 Mark II is more expensive than the average camera (£1,850 vs £290).
    £1,850 vs £290
  • 18.9 mm wider
    Width
    138.8 mm
    This camera is wider than the average camera (138.8 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    138.8 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • 93% less popular
    OM System OM-1 Mark II is less popular than the average camera (1 vs 1.9).
    1 vs 1.93
  • 17.7 mm taller body
    Height
    91.6 mm
    This camera is taller than the average camera (91.6 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    91.6 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 6.38x more expensive
    OM System OM-1 Mark II is more expensive than the average camera (£1,850 vs £290).
    £1,850 vs £290
  • 93% less popular
    OM System OM-1 Mark II is less popular than the average camera (1 vs 1.9).
    1 vs 1.93
  • 204 g heavier
    Weight
    599 g
    This camera is heavier than the average camera (599 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    599 g vs 395 g
  • No flash
    Flash
    no
    This camera does not have a built-in flash, the average camera does. 73.4% of cameras have a flash.
    Bundled external flash, not built in.
  • 18.9 mm wider
    Width
    138.8 mm
    This camera is wider than the average camera (138.8 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    138.8 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • 17.7 mm taller body
    Height
    91.6 mm
    This camera is taller than the average camera (91.6 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    91.6 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 26.7 mm thicker
    Thickness
    72.7 mm
    This camera is thicker than the average camera (72.7 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    72.7 mm vs 46 mm
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    14-bit in High Res Shot modes.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    four thirds
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (four thirds vs APS-C).
    four thirds vs APS-C

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

D
dpreview.com
30/01/2024
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
30/01/2024
Summary of the review
P
photofocus.com
20/03/2024
Summary of the review
R
rtings.com
01/05/2024
Summary of the review
D
digitalcameraworld.com
05/05/2024
Summary of the review
K
kenrockwell.com
Undated
Summary of the review
E
ephotozine.com
27/02/2026
Summary of the review
D
dkamera.de
21/03/2024
Summary of the review
D
digitalphoto.de
21/03/2024
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
05/03/2024
Summary of the review
F
fotokoeberl.at
07/02/2024
Summary of the review
R
rohnfelder.de
30/01/2024
Summary of the review
S
stephan-forstmann.de
16/12/2025
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
07/02/2025
Summary of the review
A
apprendre-la-photo.fr
17/03/2026
Summary of the review
L
leclaireur.fnac.com
17/07/2024
Summary of the review
P
photolari.com
30/01/2024
Summary of the review
M
micro43italia.it
04/03/2024
Summary of the review
M
micro43italia.it
25/10/2024
Summary of the review
F
focus-review.com
02/02/2024
Summary of the review
T
tomreuvers.nl
30/01/2024
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What we like about OM System OM-1 Mark II

  • Exceptional build quality and highly durable, featuring an IP53 weather-sealing rating that excels in harsh outdoor environments.
  • Outstanding handheld computational photography features, including built-in Neutral Density (ND) filters and exceptional image stabilization that largely removes the need for a tripod.
  • Improved ergonomics such as rubberised dials that are easier to use with gloves, and the ability to operate the power switch with one hand.
  • Class-leading autofocus system and fast frame rates, making it highly capable for sports and wildlife photography.
  • Compact and lightweight setup relative to equivalent full-frame systems, making it excellent for travel and hiking.

What we don't like about OM System OM-1 Mark II

  • Noticeable price increase compared to the original OM-1, which makes the upgrade feel costly for owners of the older model.
  • Low-light performance and noise handling do not match the capabilities of larger Full-Frame or APS-C sensor cameras.
  • Some video limitations, as straight-out-of-camera pregraded 10-bit footage can appear slightly soft.
  • The camera body is not universally light, and feels as substantial and heavy as some full-frame alternatives.

Verdict

The OM System OM-1 Mark II is a flagship Micro Four Thirds mirrorless camera featuring a 20.4MP stacked BSI Live MOS sensor and the TruePic X processor, delivering continuous shooting speeds up to 50fps with full AF tracking or 120fps with fixed focus. Its robust magnesium alloy body is IP53-rated for weather sealing and includes an industry-leading 5-axis in-body image stabilisation system offering up to 8.5 stops of compensation. Key pros include advanced computational features like LiveGND (graduated neutral density), handheld 50MP and tripod 80MP high-res modes, and a doubled buffer capacity over its predecessor for extended high-speed bursts. However, notable cons include its relatively low 20MP resolution compared to full-frame rivals, limited video features that lag behind some competitors, and a significant price increase over the original model.

Compare OM System OM-1 Mark II with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of OM System OM-1 Mark II and other products in the Cameras category

No results found