Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Canon EOS R6 Mark II Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£1,760Sensor size:full frameWeight:670 gBattery life (CIPA):580 shots

Canon EOS R6 Mark II Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

8.9

Overall score

Score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

8.9

Technical score

10%

8.2

User score

★Better than 98% of cameras
8.9

Technical score

Technical score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

8.6

Sensor & Image

25%

9.8

Photo Features

18%

8.5

Video & Audio

14%

8.1

Display & Design

8%

10

Battery & Power

7%

8.9

Connectivity & Storage

★Better than 98% of cameras
8.2

User score

User score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.1

User ratings

30%

6.1

Number of reviews

Based on 43 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▲Better than 75% of cameras
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Canon EOS R6 Mark II

Technical score
Technical score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

8.6

Sensor & Image

25%

9.8

Photo Features

18%

8.5

Video & Audio

14%

8.1

Display & Design

8%

10

Battery & Power

7%

8.9

Connectivity & Storage

8.9
User score
User score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.1

User ratings

30%

6.1

Number of reviews

Based on 43 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.2
Popularity
Popularity
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Canon EOS R6 Mark II has a popularity score of 6.1, which is higher than 63.2% of cameras.
6.1
Value for money
Value for money
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

8.9

Overall score

40%

1.2

Price

6.6
Sensor size
full frame
Sensor size
full frame
This camera uses a sensor classified as full frame; it is larger than the sensor in 83.7% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 14% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
24.2 MP
Main camera megapixels
24.2 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 24.2 MP, which is higher than that of 78% of cameras and equal to that of 5.8% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
6 µm
Main camera pixel size
6 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 6 µm, which are larger than those in 92.8% of cameras and the same size as those in 1.5% of cameras.
Base ISO
100
Base ISO
100
This camera has a base ISO of 100 which is higher than that of 19.9% of cameras and equal to that of 52.4% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 102400 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 102,400
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 102,400, which is higher than that of 97.5% of cameras and equal to that of 1.8% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
Canon RF
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
4,897
N. of focus points
4,897
This camera has 4,897 focus points, more than the number offered by 99% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 0.1% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
yes
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
yes
This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.3% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
AF tracking
yes
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 88% of cameras.
Show more
Max video resolution
3,840 px
Max video resolution
3,840 px
This camera supports 3,840 px video recording which is higher quality than that of 76% of cameras and equal to that of 19.2% of cameras.
Video bitrate
340 Mbps
Video bitrate
340 Mbps
This camera has a video bitrate of 340 Mbps which is higher than that of 90.9% of cameras and equal to that of 0.6% of cameras.
time-lapse peak 470 Mbps
Video bit depth
10 bit
Video bit depth
10 bit
This camera supports video at 10 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 88.5% of cameras and equal to that of 7.4% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:2
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:2
This camera supports 4:2:2 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 77.9% of cameras and equal to that of 22.1% of cameras.
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, ProRes RAW
Show more
Type
mirrorless
Weight
670 g
Weight
670 g
This camera weighs 670 g which is heavier than 79.8% of cameras and equal to the weight of 0.6% of cameras.
Width
138.4 mm
Width
138.4 mm
This camera has a width of 138.4 mm which is wider than 84.4% of cameras and equal to that of 0.3% of cameras.
Height
98.4 mm
Height
98.4 mm
This camera has a height of 98.4 mm which is taller than 82% of cameras and equal to that of 0.1% of cameras.
Thickness
88.4 mm
Thickness
88.4 mm
This camera has a thickness of 88.4 mm which is thicker than 87.1% of cameras and equal to that of 0.2% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
580 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
580 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 580 shots, which is longer than that of 86.1% of cameras and equal to that of 0.5% of cameras.
760 in power saving mode.
Battery capacity
2,130 mAh
Battery capacity
2,130 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 2,130 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 89.1% of cameras and equal to those in 0.7% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
yes
USB Power Delivery (PD)
yes
This camera supports USB Power Delivery. 10% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
USB PD charging only when powered off.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This camera supports Wi-Fi. This feature is available on 47.8% of cameras.
2.4GHz, 5GHz
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
This camera uses Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac) which is newer than that of 89.9% of cameras and equal to that of 9.6% of cameras.
Bluetooth connectivity
yes
Bluetooth connectivity
yes
This camera has Bluetooth. 22.6% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth 5.
Bluetooth version
5
Bluetooth version
5
This camera supports Bluetooth version 5 which is newer than that supported by 96% of cameras and equal to that of 3.2% of cameras.
USB Type-C
yes
USB Type-C
yes
This camera features USB Type-C. 14.5% of cameras use USB-C ports.
Data and power.
Show more

Canon EOS R6 Mark II vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • 4,874 more AF points
    N. of focus points
    4,897
    This camera has more focus points than the average camera (4,897 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    4,897 vs 23
  • In-body stabilization
    Sensor-shift stabilization
    yes
    This camera supports in-body stabilization, the average camera does not.
    5-axis in-body stabilization.
  • Phase-detect AF for photos
    Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
    yes
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos, the average camera does not.
  • 96,000 ISO higher maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    102,400 ISO
    This camera has a higher maximum sensitivity than the average camera (102400 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    102,400 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • 4 stops more CIPA-rated stabilization
    Image stabilization rating (CIPA)
    8 stops
    This camera offers more CIPA-rated stabilization than the average camera (8 stops vs 4 stops). The average camera reaches 4 stops.
    8 stops vs 4 stops
  • 2.66 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    6 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (6 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    6 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 310 Mbps higher video bitrate
    Video bitrate
    340 Mbps
    This camera has a higher video bitrate than the average camera (340 Mbps vs 30 Mbps). The average camera records at 30 Mbps.
    time-lapse peak 470 Mbps
    340 Mbps vs 30 Mbps
  • 6.3 fps faster mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    12 fps
    This camera has a faster mechanical burst than the average camera (12 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    12 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 2.5% higher user score
    User score
    8.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Canon EOS R6 Mark II
    the average camera
    Canon EOS R6 Mark II has a higher user score than the average camera (8.20 vs 8.000).
    8.2 vs 8
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    electronic
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (electronic vs none).
    electronic vs none
  • Fully articulated screen
    Flip-out screen
    yes
    This camera has a fully articulated screen, the average camera does not.
  • Has a touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    This camera has a touchscreen, the average camera does not. 36.6% of cameras support touchscreen input.
  • 1330000 dots higher EVF resolution
    EVF resolution
    3,690,000 dots
    This camera has a higher EVF resolution than the average camera (3690000 dots vs 2360000 dots). The average camera has an EVF resolution of 2360000 dots.
    3690000 dots vs 2360000 dots
  • 60 Hz higher EVF refresh rate
    Max EVF refresh rate
    120 Hz
    This camera has a higher EVF refresh rate than the average camera (120 Hz vs 60 Hz). The average camera has an EVF refresh rate of 60 Hz.
    Maximum in smooth/high-performance mode.
    120 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • 11 more customizable buttons
    Customizable button count
    11
    This camera has more customizable buttons than the average camera (11 vs 0). The average camera offers 0 customizable buttons.
    11 vs 0
  • 96,000 ISO higher maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    102,400 ISO
    This camera has a higher maximum sensitivity than the average camera (102400 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    102,400 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • 2.66 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    6 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (6 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    6 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 179,500 ISO higher extended sensitivity limit
    Max expanded ISO
    204,800 ISO
    This camera has a higher expanded ISO than the average camera (204800 ISO vs 25300 ISO). The average camera reaches an expanded ISO of 25300 ISO.
    204,800 ISO vs 25,300 ISO
  • Larger sensor
    Sensor size
    full frame
    This camera has a larger sensor than the average camera (full frame vs APS-C).
    full frame vs APS-C
  • Sensor cleaning system
    Sensor cleaning system
    yes
    This camera includes a sensor cleaning system, the average camera does not.
    EOS Integrated Cleaning System.
  • 2.2 points higher DxOMark Landscape score
    DxOMark landscape score
    14.6 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark landscape score than the average camera (14.6 points vs 12.4 points). The average camera scores 12.4 points.
    14.6 points vs 12.4 points
  • Higher sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    24.2 MP
    This camera has a higher sensor resolution than the average camera (24.2 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    24.2 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • Supports HEIF photos
    HEIF photo support
    yes
    This camera supports HEIF photos, the average camera does not.
    HEIF in HDR PQ mode.
  • 20 points higher DxOMark sensor score
    DxOMark sensor score
    93 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark sensor score than the average camera (93 points vs 73 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sensor score of 73 points.
    93 points vs 73 points
  • 9 newer
    Release date
    2022
    This camera is newer than the average camera (2022 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    November 2022
    2,022 vs 2,013
  • 4,874 more AF points
    N. of focus points
    4,897
    This camera has more focus points than the average camera (4,897 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    4,897 vs 23
  • In-body stabilization
    Sensor-shift stabilization
    yes
    This camera supports in-body stabilization, the average camera does not.
    5-axis in-body stabilization.
  • Phase-detect AF for photos
    Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
    yes
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos, the average camera does not.
  • 4 stops more CIPA-rated stabilization
    Image stabilization rating (CIPA)
    8 stops
    This camera offers more CIPA-rated stabilization than the average camera (8 stops vs 4 stops). The average camera reaches 4 stops.
    8 stops vs 4 stops
  • 6.3 fps faster mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    12 fps
    This camera has a faster mechanical burst than the average camera (12 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    12 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • Human eye AF
    Eye detection AF (human)
    yes
    This camera supports human eye-detection AF, the average camera does not.
  • Combined stabilization
    Combined image stabilization
    yes
    This camera supports combined stabilization, the average camera does not.
    Coordinated body+lens control.
  • Animal eye AF
    Eye detection AF (animal)
    yes
    This camera supports animal eye-detection AF, the average camera does not.
  • 359,969 s longer maximum exposure
    Longest shutter speed
    359,999 s
    This camera supports a longer maximum exposure than the average camera (359999 s s vs 30 s s). The average camera supports a longest shutter speed of 30 s s.
    359,999 s vs 30 s
  • 300,000 more shutter cycles
    Shutter durability rating
    400,000
    This camera has a higher shutter durability than the average camera (400,000 vs 100,000). The average camera is rated for 100,000 shutter cycles.
    400,000 vs 100,000
  • Lossless compressed RAW
    Lossless compressed RAW
    yes
    This camera supports lossless compressed RAW, while the average camera does not.
    Lossless RAW capture is supported.
  • Supports touch autofocus
    Touch autofocus
    yes
    This camera supports touch autofocus, the average camera does not. 34.9% of cameras support touch autofocus.
  • Better low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    -6.5
    This camera has a better low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (-6.5 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    Rated with f/1.2 lens.
    -6.5 vs -4
  • Supports focus bracketing
    Focus bracketing
    yes
    This camera supports focus bracketing, the average camera does not.
    Includes in-camera depth compositing.
  • Has anti-flicker mode
    Anti-flicker mode
    yes
    This camera includes an anti-flicker mode, the average camera does not. 20% of cameras include it.
  • In-camera panorama mode
    In-camera panorama mode
    yes
    This camera includes an in-camera panorama mode, the average camera does not.
    SCN mode
  • 310 Mbps higher video bitrate
    Video bitrate
    340 Mbps
    This camera has a higher video bitrate than the average camera (340 Mbps vs 30 Mbps). The average camera records at 30 Mbps.
    time-lapse peak 470 Mbps
    340 Mbps vs 30 Mbps
  • Includes headphone output
    Headphone output
    yes
    This camera includes a headphone output, the average camera does not.
    3.5 mm headphone jack
  • Has microphone input
    Microphone input
    yes
    This camera has microphone input, the average camera does not.
  • Higher video resolution
    Max video resolution
    3,840 px
    This camera records higher-resolution video than the average camera (3840 px vs 1920 px). The average camera records at 1920 px.
    3840 px vs 1920 px
  • Supports slow-motion video
    Slow-motion video
    yes
    This camera supports slow-motion video, the average camera does not.
    Supports up to 180 fps high-speed video.
  • More complete chroma subsampling
    Video chroma subsampling
    4:2:2
    This camera supports better video chroma subsampling than the average camera (4:2:2 vs 4:2:0). The average camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling.
    4:2:2 vs 4:2:0
  • Phase-detect AF in video
    Phase-detection autofocus (video)
    yes
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus in video, the average camera does not.
  • Higher video color depth
    Video bit depth
    10 bit
    This camera supports a higher video bit depth than the average camera (10 bit vs 8 bit). The average camera supports video at 8 bit.
    10 bit vs 8 bit
  • Clean HDMI output
    Clean HDMI output
    yes
    This camera offers clean HDMI output, the average camera does not.
  • Supports live streaming
    Live streaming (first-party)
    yes
    This camera supports live streaming, the average camera does not.
    USB webcam/UVC.
  • Supports log profiles
    Log profile support
    yes
    This camera supports log profiles, the average camera does not.
    Canon Log 3
  • Built-in timelapse
    Timelapse function
    yes
    This camera includes timelapse capture, the average camera does not.
    Interval timer + time-lapse movie
  • Supports 24p cinema mode
    24p cinema mode
    yes
    This camera supports 24p cinema mode, the average camera does not. 44% of cameras support this mode.
  • 330 min longer recording time
    Max video recording time
    360 min
    This camera records continuously for longer than the average camera (360 min vs 30 min). The average camera records for 30 min.
    360 min vs 30 min
  • 250 shots more shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    580 shots
    This camera has longer battery life than the average camera (580 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    760 in power saving mode.
    580 shots vs 330 shots
  • 1,010 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    2,130 mAh
    This camera has a higher battery capacity than the average camera (2130 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    2,130 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • USB Power Delivery
    USB Power Delivery (PD)
    yes
    This camera supports USB Power Delivery, the average camera does not.
    USB PD charging only when powered off.
  • Dual card slots
    Dual card slots
    yes
    This camera offers dual card slots, the average camera does not. 13.3% of cameras offer them.
    2x SD UHS-II
  • Has USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    yes
    This camera has a USB Type-C port, the average camera does not. 14.5% of cameras use USB-C.
    Data and power.
  • Has Bluetooth
    Bluetooth connectivity
    yes
    This camera supports Bluetooth, the average camera does not. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
    Bluetooth 5.
  • Supports Wi-Fi connectivity
    Wi-Fi connectivity
    yes
    This camera supports Wi-Fi, the average camera does not. 47.8% of cameras support Wi-Fi.
    2.4GHz, 5GHz
  • Smartphone remote control
    Smartphone remote control
    yes
    This camera supports smartphone remote control, the average camera does not. 46.2% of cameras support smartphone remote control.
    via Canon Camera Connect
  • Newer USB version
    USB version
    USB 3.2 Gen 2
    This camera supports a newer USB version than the average camera (USB 3.2 Gen 2 vs USB 2). The average camera uses USB 2.0.
    USB 3.2 Gen 2 vs USB 2.0
  • Newer HDMI version
    HDMI version
    2.0
    This camera uses HDMI 2, while the average camera uses HDMI 1.4.
    2.0 vs 1.4
  • 275 g heavier
    Weight
    670 g
    This camera is heavier than the average camera (670 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    670 g vs 395 g
  • No flash
    Flash
    no
    This camera does not have a built-in flash, the average camera does. 73.4% of cameras have a flash.
  • 42.4 mm thicker
    Thickness
    88.4 mm
    This camera is thicker than the average camera (88.4 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    88.4 mm vs 46 mm
  • 24.5 mm taller body
    Height
    98.4 mm
    This camera is taller than the average camera (98.4 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    98.4 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 6.07x more expensive
    Canon EOS R6 Mark II is more expensive than the average camera (£1,760 vs £290).
    £1,760 vs £290
  • 18.5 mm wider
    Width
    138.4 mm
    This camera is wider than the average camera (138.4 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    138.4 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • 6.07x more expensive
    Canon EOS R6 Mark II is more expensive than the average camera (£1,760 vs £290).
    £1,760 vs £290
  • 275 g heavier
    Weight
    670 g
    This camera is heavier than the average camera (670 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    670 g vs 395 g
  • No flash
    Flash
    no
    This camera does not have a built-in flash, the average camera does. 73.4% of cameras have a flash.
  • 42.4 mm thicker
    Thickness
    88.4 mm
    This camera is thicker than the average camera (88.4 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    88.4 mm vs 46 mm
  • 24.5 mm taller body
    Height
    98.4 mm
    This camera is taller than the average camera (98.4 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    98.4 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 18.5 mm wider
    Width
    138.4 mm
    This camera is wider than the average camera (138.4 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    138.4 mm vs 119.9 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

D
dpreview.com
22/02/2023
Summary of the review
D
digitalcameraworld.com
14/12/2022
Summary of the review
R
rtings.com
06/03/2026
Summary of the review
V
videomaker.com
11/05/2023
Summary of the review
F
fstoppers.com
06/01/2023
Summary of the review
T
the-digital-picture.com
19/02/2024
Summary of the review
F
focus-review.com
30/06/2023
Summary of the review
P
petapixel.com
20/01/2023
Summary of the review
D
dustinabbott.net
10/04/2023
Summary of the review
M
mpb.com
26/03/2026
Summary of the review
T
thrumylens.org
03/08/2024
Summary of the review
E
ephotozine.com
16/03/2023
Summary of the review
S
stefanodegirmenci.com
05/03/2025
Summary of the review
D
digitalkamera.de
31/01/2023
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
03/02/2023
Summary of the review
D
digitalphoto.de
23/01/2023
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
07/11/2024
Summary of the review
K
klapszus.de
30/12/2022
Summary of the review
F
fotomagazin.de
23/06/2023
Summary of the review
C
calumet.de
16/05/2023
Summary of the review
I
imtest.de
28/04/2023
Summary of the review
M
mixed.de
23/12/2023
Summary of the review
S
stephan-forstmann.de
07/06/2023
Summary of the review
D
dkamera.de
21/01/2023
Summary of the review
F
fotokoch.de
02/11/2022
Summary of the review
D
dkamera.de
12/01/2023
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
21/01/2023
Summary of the review
P
phototrend.fr
22/11/2022
Summary of the review
W
webastro.net
22/01/2023
Summary of the review
L
leclaireur.fnac.com
21/11/2023
Summary of the review
A
apprendre-la-photo.fr
02/11/2022
Summary of the review
C
camerarace.com
02/11/2022
Summary of the review
S
stefanodegirmenci.com
05/03/2025
Summary of the review
E
eosr.es
08/07/2023
Summary of the review
F
fotocult.it
16/02/2023
Summary of the review
G
galaxus.it
01/01/2023
Summary of the review
M
mpb.com
26/03/2026
Summary of the review
G
global.techradar.com
03/02/2023
Summary of the review
C
canon.it
03/11/2022
Summary of the review
P
photofacts.nl
13/01/2023
Summary of the review
G
gertjanhermus.nl
23/11/2025
Summary of the review
E
eoszine.nl
30/12/2022
Summary of the review
S
shoot.be
29/05/2023
Summary of the review
C
cameradeals.nl
25/10/2023
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 43 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Canon EOS R6 Mark II

  • High-speed performance with up to 40fps electronic shutter burst shooting
  • Advanced autofocus with reliable subject detection for people, animals, and vehicles
  • Excellent 4K/60p video without cropping and improved thermal management over its predecessor
  • Effective 5-axis In-Body Image Stabilisation (IBIS) for sharp handheld shots
  • Comfortable ergonomics with a deep grip and intuitive physical controls
  • Lightweight yet robust build quality with weather-sealed protection

What we don't like about Canon EOS R6 Mark II

  • Limited native third-party lens options compared to competitors like Sony
  • Use of a micro-HDMI port rather than a more durable full-sized connection
  • Moderate sensor resolution (24.2MP) may limit deep cropping for some professional uses
  • Potential for rolling shutter distortion when using the high-speed electronic shutter
  • Lack of 4K/120p video recording, which is limited to 1080p on this model
  • Reports of battery drain when Bluetooth/Wi-Fi remain active while powered off

Verdict

The Canon EOS R6 Mark II is a versatile full-frame mirrorless camera featuring a 24.2MP CMOS sensor and the DIGIC X processor, capable of blistering burst speeds of 12fps with a mechanical shutter and up to 40fps using its electronic shutter. Its advanced Dual Pixel CMOS AF II system provides deep-learning-based subject tracking for humans, animals, and vehicles, while the in-body image stabilisation (IBIS) offers up to 8 stops of shake correction. For video, it records uncropped oversampled 4K at 60p internally with 10-bit 4:2:2 colour and supports 6K RAW external output via HDMI. Main pros include its class-leading autofocus, impressive low-light performance with a native ISO up to 102,400, and lack of a 30-minute recording limit for movies. However, cons include a fragile micro-HDMI port, limited third-party autofocus lens support due to Canon's closed RF mount, and reduced dynamic range when shooting at the maximum 40fps electronic shutter speed.

Compare Canon EOS R6 Mark II with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Canon EOS R6 Mark II and other products in the Cameras category

No results found