Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartwatches Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v3.0

Redmi Watch 5 review: 127 specs compared

Avg. price:~£95Screen size:2.07 inchBattery life:24 daysDisplay type:AMOLED

Redmi Watch 5 Review: Compare 127 technical specifications, 59 expert and video reviews and 13 best-of lists to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

Redmi Watch 5
7.9/10

Overall score

Score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

35%

7.4

Technical score

30%

8.6

List score

25%

8.3

Reviews score

10%

?

Sentiment scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 6.8, the mark of a weaker model in this category

▲Better than 80% of smartwatches
8.5

Value for money

Value for money
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.9

Overall score

30%

10

Price

▲Better than 84%
7.4

Technical score

Technical score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

24%

6.9

Health

21%

8.8

Fitness

16%

6.2

Battery

14%

8.0

Smart features

12%

6.5

Connectivity

9%

8.3

Display & Design

4%

5.7

Hardware

▲Better than 70%
8.3

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10

80%

8.1

Average grade

20%

9.2

Popularity

Grades by review (59)
27 reviews + 32 videos, average 8.1/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
▲Better than 73%
8.6

List score

List score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (13)
List score: in 13 of 121 lists (11%)
★Better than 96%

What reviewers say about the Redmi Watch 5

Based on 10 · 12

Reviewers love the bright display and solid battery and GPS, but notifications, limited settings and app support disappoint.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the Redmi Watch 5

Based on 196 owners sharing their experience in online comments

23%positive11%mixed66%negative

Owners praise the long battery life and large, sharp screen, while unreliable calls and notifications cause the most frustration.

What owners dislike

  • Incoming phone calls often show only as a missed call and cannot be answered from the watch, especially on some phones; owners report call audio stays on the phone.22
  • Message and app notifications often arrive without content, or only some apps such as WhatsApp appear, and WhatsApp Business is missing.20
  • Alexa often shows as unavailable, because it is not offered in many countries or regions, and some owners cannot link it at all.13
  • Owners cannot delete or upload wallpapers and watch faces easily, and personalization options or photo backgrounds are missing.10
  • Owners say GPS drops out or fails to connect, and step, pace and calorie readings are often inaccurate.10
  • Owners say swimming is missing from the workout list, and they cannot add or edit other activities.8
  • Owners say calendar events do not sync to the watch, and tasks do not show as expected.7
  • Owners say the app and watch show English text such as weekdays and quick replies even after setting Spanish or Portuguese.7
  • The watch does not measure blood pressure or blood sugar, although the app lists a blood pressure option for manual entries.7
  • Bluetooth often disconnects or reconnects unpredictably, and some owners say it keeps trying to connect to other devices.6

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Redmi Watch 5

Technical score
Technical score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

24%

6.9

Health

21%

8.8

Fitness

16%

6.2

Battery

14%

8.0

Smart features

12%

6.5

Connectivity

9%

8.3

Display & Design

4%

5.7

Hardware

7.4
Reviews score
8.3
List score
8.6
Value for money
Value for money
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

7.9

Overall score

30%

10

Price

8.5
Heart rate monitor
yes
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 9.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 30.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
Readings are for wellness use, not medical diagnosis.
ECG
no
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 18.2% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings. 49.5% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
Supports abnormal high/low heart-rate alerts (typically after inactivity).
HRV tracking
yes
This smartwatch supports HRV tracking. 54.9% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.5% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
no
This smartwatch does not include a barometer. 53.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 28.9% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
no
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 32.9% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 3.7% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
Battery life
24 days
This smartwatch lasts 24 days on a charge, which is longer than 93.2% of Smartwatches and the same as 0.7% of Smartwatches.
Battery life in training mode
15 h
This smartwatch records workouts for 15 h on a charge, which is shorter than 58% of Smartwatches and the same as 2.5% of Smartwatches.
Battery life with GPS on
8 h
This smartwatch lasts 8 h with GPS on, which is shorter than 82.3% of Smartwatches and the same as 1.3% of Smartwatches.
Battery power
389 mAh
This smartwatch has a 389 mAh battery, which is larger than 69.1% of Smartwatches and the same as 0.1% of Smartwatches.
Charge time
60 min
This smartwatch charges from empty in 60 min, which is quicker than 83.8% of Smartwatches and the same as 12% of Smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
HyperOS
This smartwatch runs HyperOS, which is more advanced than the system in 57% of Smartwatches and equal to 1.7% of Smartwatches.
Software update frequency
occasional
This smartwatch has occasional software update support which is more active than that of 54% of smartwatches and equal to that of 40.2% of smartwatches.
Updates are typically released about every 3 months.
Third-party app support
no
This smartwatch does not support third-party apps. 51.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 30.8% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 16.7% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
1
This smartwatch uses 1 for cellular connectivity which is more advanced than that of 2% of smartwatches and the same as that of 98% of smartwatches.
eSIM
GPS
yes
This smartwatch supports GPS. 40.3% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
yes
This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation. 56.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Dual-frequency GPS
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen size
2.07 inch
This smartwatch has a 2.07 inch screen, which is larger than 98.8% of Smartwatches and the same as 0.4% of Smartwatches.
Display type
AMOLED
This smartwatch uses AMOLED, which is more advanced than the screen in 46.9% of Smartwatches and equal to 53.1% of Smartwatches.
Resolution
432x 514
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 432x514 which is higher than that of 74.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.4% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
324 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 324 ppi, which is lower than 56.3% of Smartwatches and equal to 0.7% of Smartwatches.
Display brightness
1,500 nits
This smartwatch has a screen brightness of 1,500 nits, which is higher than 82.6% of Smartwatches and equal to 2% of Smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
?
Processor model
?
RAM
?
Internal storage
0.164 GB
This smartwatch has 0.164 GB of internal storage, which is less than 67.7% of Smartwatches.
164 MB available internal storage.
External memory slot
no
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more
What reviewers say

Redmi Watch 5 vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • 17 days longer battery life
    This smartwatch runs longer per charge than the average smartwatch (24 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    24 days vs 7 days
  • 60 min quicker charging
    This smartwatch charges faster than the average smartwatch (60 min vs 120 min). The average smartwatch takes 120 min to charge from empty.
    60 min vs 120 min
  • Fall detection
    This smartwatch supports fall detection, the average smartwatch does not. 23% of smartwatches support fall detection.
  • HRV tracking
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 45.2% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • Emergency SOS
    This smartwatch includes Emergency SOS, the average smartwatch does not. 44.8% of smartwatches include Emergency SOS.
  • NFC functionality
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 45.2% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • More frequent updates
    This smartwatch receives occasional software updates, while the average smartwatch receives ended updates.
    Updates are typically released about every 3 months.
    occasional vs ended
  • 0.67 inch larger display
    This smartwatch has a larger screen than the average smartwatch (2.1 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch has a 1.4 inch screen.
    2.07 inch vs 1.4 inch
  • 18.6% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    80%

    8.1

    Average grade

    20%

    9.2

    Popularity

    Grades by review (59)
    27 reviews + 32 videos, average 8.1/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.3 vs 7.0
  • 8.9% higher list score
    List score
    8.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
    How we count it
    Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
    Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
    Lists with this model (13)
    List score: in 13 of 121 lists (11%)
    8.6 vs 7.9
  • 10.1% better value for money
    Redmi Watch 5 has a higher value-for-money score than the average smartwatch (8.55 vs 7.8).
    8.55 vs 7.76
  • HRV tracking
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 45.2% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • Calorie tracking
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.7% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
  • 4 years newer
    This smartwatch was released more recently than the average smartwatch (2025 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    January 2025
    2025 vs 2021
  • 55 more exercise types
    This smartwatch includes more exercise types than the average smartwatch (145 vs 90). The average smartwatch includes 90 exercise types.
    Reported as at least 145 exercise modes.
    145 vs 90
  • 17 days longer battery life
    This smartwatch runs longer per charge than the average smartwatch (24 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    24 days vs 7 days
  • 60 min quicker charging
    This smartwatch charges faster than the average smartwatch (60 min vs 120 min). The average smartwatch takes 120 min to charge from empty.
    60 min vs 120 min
  • 84 mAh larger battery capacity
    This smartwatch has a larger battery than the average smartwatch (389 mAh vs 305 mAh). The average smartwatch has a 305 mAh battery.
    389 mAh vs 305 mAh
  • NFC functionality
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 45.2% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • Galileo satellite support
    This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation, the average smartwatch does not. 43.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
  • More current Bluetooth version
    This smartwatch uses a more current Bluetooth version than the average smartwatch (5.3 vs 5).
    5.3 vs 5
  • 0.67 inch larger display
    This smartwatch has a larger screen than the average smartwatch (2.1 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch has a 1.4 inch screen.
    2.07 inch vs 1.4 inch
  • 750 nits brighter screen
    This smartwatch has a brighter screen than the average smartwatch (1,500 nits vs 750 nits). The average smartwatch peaks at 750 nits.
    1,500 nits vs 750 nits
  • 11.5 g lighter
    This smartwatch is lighter than the average smartwatch (33.5 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45 g.
    Weight refers to watch case without strap/band.
    33.5 g vs 45 g
  • Higher resolution
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 432x514, while the average smartwatch reaches 360x360.
    432x514 vs 360x360
  • Fall detection
    This smartwatch supports fall detection, the average smartwatch does not. 23% of smartwatches support fall detection.
  • Emergency SOS
    This smartwatch includes Emergency SOS, the average smartwatch does not. 44.8% of smartwatches include Emergency SOS.
  • More frequent updates
    This smartwatch receives occasional software updates, while the average smartwatch receives ended updates.
    Updates are typically released about every 3 months.
    occasional vs ended
  • More advanced operating system
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (HyperOS vs Proprietary OS).
    HyperOS vs Proprietary OS
  • 1 more microphones
    This smartwatch has more microphones than the average smartwatch (2 vs 1). The average smartwatch has 1 microphones.
    2 vs 1
  • No third-party apps
    This smartwatch does not support third-party apps, the average smartwatch does. 51.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • No barometer
    This smartwatch does not include a barometer, the average smartwatch does. 53.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • 13 h shorter GPS battery life
    This smartwatch lasts less time with GPS on than the average smartwatch (8 h vs 21 h). The average smartwatch lasts 21 h with GPS on.
    8 h vs 21 h
  • Basic battery type
    This smartwatch uses a Li-ion battery, while the average smartwatch uses Li-Po.
    Rechargeable battery; chemistry unspecified.
    Li-ion vs Li-Po
  • 5 h shorter training battery life
    This smartwatch lasts less time in training mode than the average smartwatch (15 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h in training mode.
    15 h vs 20 h
  • Less practical form
    This smartwatch uses a rectangular form, while the average smartwatch uses round.
    rectangular vs round
  • Basic band material
    This smartwatch uses tpu for the band material, while the average smartwatch uses silicone.
    tpu vs silicone
  • 95.9% less internal storage
    This smartwatch has less internal storage than the average smartwatch (0.2 GB vs 4 GB). The average smartwatch has 4 GB of internal storage.
    164 MB available internal storage.
    0.164 GB vs 4 GB
  • No barometer
    This smartwatch does not include a barometer, the average smartwatch does. 53.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • 13 h shorter GPS battery life
    This smartwatch lasts less time with GPS on than the average smartwatch (8 h vs 21 h). The average smartwatch lasts 21 h with GPS on.
    8 h vs 21 h
  • Basic battery type
    This smartwatch uses a Li-ion battery, while the average smartwatch uses Li-Po.
    Rechargeable battery; chemistry unspecified.
    Li-ion vs Li-Po
  • 5 h shorter training battery life
    This smartwatch lasts less time in training mode than the average smartwatch (15 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h in training mode.
    15 h vs 20 h
  • Less practical form
    This smartwatch uses a rectangular form, while the average smartwatch uses round.
    rectangular vs round
  • 2.5 mm taller case
    This smartwatch has a taller case than the average smartwatch (47.5 mm vs 45 mm). The average smartwatch is 45 mm tall.
    47.5 mm vs 45 mm
  • Basic band material
    This smartwatch uses tpu for the band material, while the average smartwatch uses silicone.
    tpu vs silicone
  • No third-party apps
    This smartwatch does not support third-party apps, the average smartwatch does. 51.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • 95.9% less internal storage
    This smartwatch has less internal storage than the average smartwatch (0.2 GB vs 4 GB). The average smartwatch has 4 GB of internal storage.
    164 MB available internal storage.
    0.164 GB vs 4 GB

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Tech Zilla
≈ estimated
11/08/2026
Long-term review · battery and daily use tests
Verdict
Redmi Watch 5 is one of the best budget smartwatches available, with a bright screen and solid battery life.
8.0
Kyle Lowe
≈ estimated
02/12/2025
Daily use review · comparison with Apple Watch
Verdict
Redmi Watch 5 is good for battery life, health and workout tracking, but its Apple-style messaging and assistant features are weaker.
8.0
Tech, Gadgets and Other Great Ideas
≈ estimated
17/09/2025
Full review · app walkthrough, SOS and battery tests
Verdict
Redmi Watch 5 is a strong budget pick with a long-lasting battery, though its smart features are limited.
9.0
The Wearableist
≈ estimated
12/05/2025
Hands-on review · heart rate, GPS and app tests
Verdict
Redmi Watch 5 looks and feels premium and is a strong fitness tracker with no subscription, though it is not an Apple or Samsung rival.
9.0
KNACKSKILL
≈ estimated
17/03/2025
Feature walkthrough · menus, shortcuts and watch faces
Verdict
Redmi Watch 5 is an excellent Apple Watch alternative for buyers who want long battery life and good value.
5.0
SMARTECHPLUS
≈ estimated
20/02/2025
Global vs Chinese version comparison · iPhone and Android tests
Verdict
Redmi Watch 5's global version lacks several Chinese-version features, so the Chinese model is advised if your phone uses English.
8.0
Wise Tech Buys
≈ estimated
13/02/2025
Hands-on review · display, battery, GPS and missing features
Verdict
Redmi Watch 5 is well rounded and practical for runners, but it lacks NFC, eSIM and quick replies, and music transfers are slow.
9.0
Tech Spurt
≈ estimated
20/01/2025
Hands-on review · two weeks of daily use
Verdict
Redmi Watch 5 has strong battery life and value for money, though it lacks contactless payments and premium fitness features.
6.0
uncover+
≈ estimated
19/01/2025
Hands-on review · weeks of use, software and call tests
Verdict
Redmi Watch 5 has strong hardware for the price, but software lag and optimistic battery claims hold it back.
9.0
Nikolay Tanev
≈ estimated
18/01/2025
Hands-on review · battery, display and features
Verdict
Redmi Watch 5 is a strong smartwatch for the money with a long-lasting battery, though it lacks message replies and photo storage.
9.0
TechMishka
≈ estimated
10/01/2025
Hands-on review · battery, display and software tests
Verdict
Redmi Watch 5 is a great buy overall, though missing actionable notifications is hard to excuse in a 2025 smartwatch.
9.0
Concept Creator
≈ estimated
17/01/2025
First impressions · one week of use
Verdict
Redmi Watch 5 suits anyone who wants a watch they rarely have to charge rather than a full smartwatch.

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

9.0
markellisreviews.com
✓ explicit
01/01/2025
Hands-on review · Lightweight fitness watch
Verdict
The Redmi Watch 5 is a light watch with a huge display and weeks of battery life that suits runners, though swiping can stutter.
9.0
trustedreviews.com
✓ explicit
22/04/2025
Everyday test · Fitness watch
Verdict
The Redmi Watch 5 suits casual users who want a small, stylish watch with weeks of battery life, but it can't receive messages and its workout stats are basic.
8.0
livescience.com
✓ explicit
06/04/2025
Multi-week test · Fitness tracking
Verdict
The Redmi Watch 5 is a simple, stylish fitness watch with a clear screen and long battery life, but its strap pinches and the charging cable is short.
8.6
gadreview.com
✓ explicit
20/05/2026
Full review · Battery and fitness watch
Verdict
The Redmi Watch 5 is a long-lasting Android fitness watch with a sharp screen and swim tracking, but it lacks ECG, NFC and elevation data.
7.0
nextpit.de
✓ explicit
07/03/2025
Hands-on test · Fitness smartwatch
Verdict
The Redmi Watch 5 is a good beginner wearable with long battery life and decent running heart rate readings, but its detailed sleep stages are unreliable.
9.0
heise.de
✓ explicit
21/10/2025
Hands-on test · Fitness tracker
Verdict
The Redmi Watch 5 is an accurate fitness tracker with a large display and GPS, good for heart-rate training, though its thick frame looks big on slim wrists.
6.7
morgenpost.de
✓ explicit
18/08/2026
Practical test · Battery and comfort
Verdict
The Redmi Watch 5 suits first-time smartwatch buyers who want long battery life and a big, readable screen, but it has no navigation and few health readings.
9.0
smartzone.de
≈ estimated
22/04/2025
Hands-on test · Fitness and battery
Verdict
The Redmi Watch 5 suits buyers who want long battery life and accurate heart rate readings, but it's only a small step up from the Redmi Watch 4.
8.0
frandroid.com
✓ explicit
25/02/2026
Full review · Square fitness watch
Verdict
The Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5 suits buyers who want a large, Apple Watch-style screen and simple GPS tracking, but its heart rate readings are less reliable.
6.0
lesnumeriques.com
✓ explicit
07/02/2025
Hands-on test · Large-screen fitness watch
Verdict
The Redmi Watch 5 is a long-lasting fitness watch with a bright 2.07-inch screen and GPS, but its app lacks depth and it runs no third-party apps.
7.5
capital.fr
✓ explicit
25/06/2025
Hands-on test · Sensor accuracy
Verdict
The Redmi Watch 5 suits everyday runners who want a big, easy-to-read screen, but its sleep and interval heart rate tracking are weak.
9.0
los40.com.mx
✓ explicit
16/05/2026
Two-week test · Battery and connectivity
Verdict
The Redmi Watch 5 suits Android or iPhone owners who want long battery life and solid workout tracking, though stray touches and no replies get in the way.
7.0
andreagaleazzi.com
≈ estimated
08/02/2025
Hands-on review · Large-screen smartwatch
Verdict
The Redmi Watch 5 has a large, easy-to-read screen and excellent battery life with good call audio, but its heart rate tracking is less reliable during workouts.
8.0
evosmart.it
≈ estimated
08/02/2025
Hands-on review · Everyday smartwatch
Verdict
The Redmi Watch 5 is a bright, long-lasting smartwatch with reliable sleep tracking and over 150 sport modes, but it lacks NFC, a voice assistant and automatic workout detection.
8.0
smartworld.it
≈ estimated
15/02/2025
Hands-on review · Sports smartwatch
Verdict
The Redmi Watch 5 offers a huge, bright display and very long battery life, but its large case suits only some wrists and it can't reply to messages.
6.8
runners.nl
✓ explicit
10/06/2025
Three-week test · Fitness watch
Verdict
The Redmi Watch 5 suits walkers and casual runners who want a light, stylish watch, as long as they can charge it about every ten days.
9.0
androidics.nl
≈ estimated
02/07/2025
Hands-on review · Big-screen watch
Verdict
The Redmi Watch 5 suits people who want a large, bright, comfortable watch with long battery life and don't need third-party apps.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Redmi Watch 5

  • Exceptional battery life, often lasting 18 to 24 days on a single charge
  • Vibrant and high-brightness AMOLED display (on standard and Lite models) reaching up to 1500 nits
  • Excellent value for money, providing premium looks and basic smart features at a budget price
  • Lightweight and comfortable design suitable for all-day wear and sleep tracking
  • User-friendly and snappy interface powered by Xiaomi HyperOS
  • Reliable Bluetooth calling and clear speaker performance for hands-free communication

What customers don't like about Redmi Watch 5

  • Lack of automatic brightness adjustment, requiring manual changes for different lighting
  • Basic tracking metrics that may lack the precision required by serious athletes or fitness enthusiasts
  • Limited software integration, such as the inability to reply to messages or sync notification dismissals with a phone
  • Proprietary and notably short charging cable that can be inconvenient to use
  • Strap design (tuck-under style) can be difficult to fasten and may pinch the skin
  • Always-On Display (AOD) significantly impacts battery longevity, reducing it to approximately 5-12 days

Verdict

The Redmi Watch 5 is a budget-friendly smartwatch featuring a large 2.07-inch AMOLED display with a 60Hz refresh rate, an 82% screen-to-body ratio, and a peak brightness of 1,500 nits. Its key characteristics include a durable aluminum alloy frame with a stainless steel rotating crown, 5ATM water resistance, and built-in five-system GNSS for accurate standalone positioning. Main pros consist of an exceptional battery life of up to 24 days on a single charge, support for Bluetooth calling with dual-mic noise reduction, and a smooth user experience powered by Xiaomi HyperOS with over 150 sports modes. However, some users have noted cons such as inconsistent sleep and heart rate tracking accuracy during high-intensity exercise, a lack of third-party app support, and the absence of NFC for international payments.

Compare Redmi Watch 5 with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Redmi Watch 5 and other Smartwatches

No results found