OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Smartwatches Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 3,488 independent expert reviews and 5,192 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v2.0

Amazfit GTS 3 Review | 126 Data compared

Avg. price:~£95Screen size:1.75 inchBattery life:12 daysDisplay type:AMOLED

Amazfit GTS 3 Review: Compare 126 technical specifications and 20 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

7.3

Overall score

Score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartwatch's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartwatches on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 69% of models
Score components

70%

7.2

Technical score

30%

7.6

Review score ( 8 · 12)

Review score 30% · 7.6 · based on 20 independent reviews
Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 30%, technical score 70%. This model has enough reviews, so its review score is the weighted average of their grades. 14 more reviews are not scored yet.
â–²Better than 69% of smartwatches
7.2

Technical score

Technical score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 71% of models
Score components

24%

7.3

Health

21%

9.3

Fitness

16%

5.3

Battery

14%

6.2

Smart features

12%

6.5

Connectivity

9%

8.5

Display & Design

4%

5.5

Hardware

â–²Better than 71% of smartwatches
7.6

Review score

Review score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
Grades by review (20)
8 reviews: 3 with a printed score, 5 estimated from the review. 12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Video reviews 2

4%

8.0

Lim Reviews

4%

7.0

TechMishka

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 53% of smartwatches
  • amazfit-gts-3
  • amazfit-gts-3
  • amazfit-gts-3
  • amazfit-gts-3
  • amazfit-gts-3
  • amazfit-gts-3
  • amazfit-gts-3
  • amazfit-gts-3
  • amazfit-gts-3
amazfit-gts-3
amazfit-gts-3
amazfit-gts-3
amazfit-gts-3
amazfit-gts-3
amazfit-gts-3
amazfit-gts-3
amazfit-gts-3
amazfit-gts-3

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Amazfit GTS 3

Technical score
Technical score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 71% of models
Score components:

24%

7.3

Health

21%

9.3

Fitness

16%

5.3

Battery

14%

6.2

Smart features

12%

6.5

Connectivity

9%

8.5

Display & Design

4%

5.5

Hardware

7.2
Review score
Review score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
Grades by review (20)
8 reviews: 3 with a printed score, 5 estimated from the review. 12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Video reviews 2

4%

8.0

Lim Reviews

4%

7.0

TechMishka

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
7.6
Popularity
Popularity
9.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartwatch.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 90% of models
Popularity:
Amazfit GTS 3 has a popularity of 9.6 points, which is higher than 89.9% of smartwatches.
9.6
Value for money
Value for money
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 74% of models
Score components:

60%

7.3

Overall score

40%

10

Price

8.1
Brand name
Amazfit
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
â–² Better than 11% of models
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 10.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
â–² Better than 33% of models
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 33.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
ECG
no
â–¼ Worse than 17% of models
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
â–² Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings. 51.9% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
Accelerometer
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.6% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
yes
Barometer
yes
â–² Better than 51% of models
This smartwatch includes a barometer. 50.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
Gyroscope
yes
â–² Better than 30% of models
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 30.2% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
no
Cadence sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 31.2% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
Distance tracking
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 4.1% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery life
12 days
Battery life
12 days
â–² Better than 72% of models
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch offers a battery life of 12 days which is longer than that of 72.5% of smartwatches and equal to that of 3.3% of smartwatches.
Battery life in training mode
20 h
Battery life in training mode
20 h
â–² Better than 51% of models
Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
This smartwatch lasts 20 h in training mode which is longer than 50.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 3.6% of smartwatches.
Battery life with GPS on
18 h
Battery life with GPS on
18 h
â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
This smartwatch lasts 18 h with GPS on which is shorter than 55% of smartwatches and equal to that of 1.6% of smartwatches.
Up to 33 hours in power saving gps mode.
Battery power
250 mAh
Battery power
250 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a battery capacity of 250 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 70.6% of smartwatches and equal to those in 1.5% of smartwatches.
Charge time
150 min
Charge time
150 min
â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges in 150 min which is slower than 88.7% of smartwatches and equal to the charge time of 7.2% of smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Zepp OS
Operating system
Zepp OS
â–² Better than 60% of models
This smartwatch runs Zepp OS which is more advanced than the operating system in 60.2% of smartwatches and the same as that in 6.5% of smartwatches.
Software update frequency
occasional
Software update frequency
occasional
â–² Better than 58% of models
This smartwatch has occasional software update support which is more active than that of 57.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 36.2% of smartwatches.
Updates are typically released about every 3 months.
Third-party app support
yes
Third-party app support
yes
â–² Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports third-party apps. 52.4% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
Voice assistant support
yes
â–² Better than 32% of models
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 32.4% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
Cellular module
no
â–¼ Worse than 18% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 18% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
â–² Better than 44% of models
This smartwatch supports GPS. 43.9% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
yes
Galileo support
yes
â–² Better than 62% of models
This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation. 61.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Compass
yes
Compass
yes
â–² Better than 47% of models
This smartwatch includes a compass. 47.5% of smartwatches include a compass.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen size
1.75 inch
Screen size
1.75 inch
â–² Better than 83% of models
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
This smartwatch has a screen size of 1.75 inch which is larger than the screens of 83.2% of smartwatches and equal to those of 1.8% of smartwatches.
Display type
AMOLED
Display type
AMOLED
â–² Better than 50% of models
This smartwatch uses a AMOLED display type which is more advanced than that of 49.9% of smartwatches and the same as that of 50.1% of smartwatches.
Resolution
390x 450
Resolution
390x 450
â–² Better than 67% of models
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 390x450 which is higher than that of 67.1% of smartwatches and equal to that of 1.9% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
340 ppi
Pixel density
340 ppi
â–² Better than 59% of models
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 340 ppi which is higher than that of 58.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.7% of smartwatches.
Display brightness
1,000 nits
Display brightness
1,000 nits
â–² Better than 59% of models
Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
This smartwatch reaches 1,000 nits of display brightness, which is higher than that of 59.4% of smartwatches and equal to that of 26.5% of smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
?
Processor model
?
RAM
2 GB
RAM
2 GB
â–² Better than 78% of models
Market range: <0.5 GB – >2 GB
This smartwatch has 2 GB of RAM which is larger than the RAM in 77.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 21.4% of smartwatches.
Internal storage
2 GB
Internal storage
2 GB
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch uses 2 GB for internal storage which is smaller than that of 60.9% of smartwatches and equal to that of 1.9% of smartwatches.
External memory slot
no
External memory slot
no
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Amazfit GTS 3 vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • Temperature sensing
    Temperature sensor
    yes
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This smartwatch includes a temperature sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 26.8% of smartwatches include a temperature sensor.
    Temperature readings may be skin/ambient trends, not core-body medical values.
  • Readiness score
    Readiness score
    yes
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    This smartwatch supports readiness scores, the average smartwatch does not. 17.5% of smartwatches support readiness scores.
  • VO2 max measurement
    VO2 max measurement
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch measures VO2 max, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • Third-party app support
    Third-party app support
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports third-party apps, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • Irregular heart rate alerts
    Irregular heart rate warnings
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does not. 48.1% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • 5 days day/s longer battery life
    Battery life
    12 days
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 12 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    12 days vs 7 days
  • More frequent updates
    Software update frequency
    occasional
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    This smartwatch receives occasional software updates, while the average smartwatch receives ended updates.
    Updates are typically released about every 3 months.
    occasional vs ended
  • More advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Zepp OS
    â–² Better than 60% of models
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Zepp OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Zepp OS vs Proprietary OS
  • 57.6% more popular
    Amazfit GTS 3 has a higher popularity than the average smartwatch (9.65 vs 6.1).
    9.65 vs 6.12
  • Temperature sensing
    Temperature sensor
    yes
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This smartwatch includes a temperature sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 26.8% of smartwatches include a temperature sensor.
    Temperature readings may be skin/ambient trends, not core-body medical values.
  • Readiness score
    Readiness score
    yes
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    This smartwatch supports readiness scores, the average smartwatch does not. 17.5% of smartwatches support readiness scores.
  • VO2 max measurement
    VO2 max measurement
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch measures VO2 max, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • Irregular heart rate alerts
    Irregular heart rate warnings
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does not. 48.1% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • Calorie tracking
    Calorie tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.6% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
    Food logging may require a companion or third-party app.
  • Barometer sensor included
    Barometer
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This smartwatch includes a barometer, the average smartwatch does not. 49.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • 70 more exercise profiles
    Multi-sport mode
    150
    â–² Better than 32% of models
    This smartwatch supports more exercise modes than the average smartwatch (150 vs 80). The average smartwatch supports 80 exercise modes.
    Reported as at least 150 exercise modes.
    150 vs 80
  • Route support
    Route support
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch supports route support, the average smartwatch does not. 50% of smartwatches support route support.
    Route support available via companion app.
  • 5 days day/s longer battery life
    Battery life
    12 days
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 12 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    12 days vs 7 days
  • Galileo satellite support
    Galileo support
    yes
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation, the average smartwatch does not. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.1
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    This smartwatch supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average smartwatch (5.1 vs 5). The average smartwatch uses 5.0.
    5.1 vs 5.0
  • 20.6 g lighter weight
    Weight
    24.4 g
    ★ Better than 96% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is lighter than the average smartwatch (24.4 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    Weight refers to watch case without strap/band.
    24.4 g vs 45.0 g
  • 400 nits higher display brightness
    Display brightness
    1,000 nits
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
    This smartwatch has higher display brightness than the average smartwatch (1000 nits vs 600 nits). The average smartwatch reaches 600 nits.
    1,000 nits vs 600 nits
  • 0.35 inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    1.75 inch
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
    This smartwatch has a larger screen size than the average smartwatch (1.8 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch screen is 1.40 inch.
    1.75 inch vs 1.40 inch
  • 2.8 mm thinner watch body
    Thickness
    8.80 mm
    ★ Better than 96% of models
    Market range: <9.8 mm – >14.1 mm
    This smartwatch is thinner than the average smartwatch (8.8 mm vs 11.6 mm). The average smartwatch thickness is 11.6 mm.
    8.80 mm vs 11.6 mm
  • 2 mm narrower band
    Width of band
    20.0 mm
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    Market range: <20 mm – >22 mm
    This smartwatch has a narrower band width than the average smartwatch (20 mm vs 22 mm). The average smartwatch band is 22.0 mm wide.
    20.0 mm vs 22.0 mm
  • 6 mm narrower watch width
    Width
    36.0 mm
    â–² Better than 81% of models
    Market range: <34.6 mm – >46.8 mm
    This smartwatch is narrower than the average smartwatch (36 mm vs 42 mm). The average smartwatch width is 42.0 mm.
    36.0 mm vs 42.0 mm
  • Third-party app support
    Third-party app support
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports third-party apps, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • More frequent updates
    Software update frequency
    occasional
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    This smartwatch receives occasional software updates, while the average smartwatch receives ended updates.
    Updates are typically released about every 3 months.
    occasional vs ended
  • More advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Zepp OS
    â–² Better than 60% of models
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Zepp OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Zepp OS vs Proprietary OS
  • 1 GB more RAM
    RAM
    2 GB
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <0.5 GB – >2 GB
    This smartwatch has more RAM than the average smartwatch (2 GB vs 1 GB). The average smartwatch includes 1 GB of RAM.
    2 GB vs 1 GB
  • No music playback
    Music playback
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 54.2% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No call answering
    Call answering
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This smartwatch does not support call answering, the average smartwatch does. 58.1% of smartwatches support call answering.
  • No speaker
    Built-in speaker
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.
  • 30 min longer charge time
    Charge time
    150 min
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <60 min – >150 min
    This smartwatch charges slower than the average smartwatch (150 min vs 120 min). The average smartwatch charges in 120 min.
    150 min vs 120 min
  • 50 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery life
    250 mAh days
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartwatch (250 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    250 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • Less practical form
    Form
    rectangular
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This smartwatch uses a rectangular form, while the average smartwatch uses round.
    rectangular vs round
  • 2 h shorter GPS battery life
    Battery life with GPS on
    18 h
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
    This smartwatch lasts less with GPS on than the average smartwatch (18 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h.
    Up to 33 hours in power saving gps mode.
    18 h vs 20 h
  • 30 min longer charge time
    Charge time
    150 min
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <60 min – >150 min
    This smartwatch charges slower than the average smartwatch (150 min vs 120 min). The average smartwatch charges in 120 min.
    150 min vs 120 min
  • 50 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery life
    250 mAh days
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartwatch (250 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    250 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • 2 h shorter GPS battery life
    Battery life with GPS on
    18 h
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
    This smartwatch lasts less with GPS on than the average smartwatch (18 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h.
    Up to 33 hours in power saving gps mode.
    18 h vs 20 h
  • Less practical form
    Form
    rectangular
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This smartwatch uses a rectangular form, while the average smartwatch uses round.
    rectangular vs round
  • No music playback
    Music playback
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 54.2% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No call answering
    Call answering
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This smartwatch does not support call answering, the average smartwatch does. 58.1% of smartwatches support call answering.
  • No speaker
    Built-in speaker
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

7.0
TechMishka
≈ estimated
06/12/2021
Full review · build, GPS, software and battery tests
Verdict
Amazfit GTS 3 has mixed results: a strong build, GPS and software, but a weak battery and little hardware progress.
8.0
Lim Reviews
≈ estimated
23/10/2021
First look · new features, workouts and GPS test
Verdict
Amazfit GTS 3 brings clear gains in display, GPS and workout features, but has no music storage and modest battery life.
Not graded yet
Hands-on video, no verdict
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

What reviewers agree on

Based on 9 · 12

Reviewers praise the bright screen, smooth app and solid design, but calls and messages fall short and battery life divides opinion.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.4
bikepacking-adventures.com
✓ explicit
10/02/2024
Hands-on test · Square fitness watch
Verdict
The Amazfit GTS 3 is a bright, light fitness watch with an intuitive crown, but with constant use it lasts about four days, not the claimed 12.
5.0
nerdsheaven.de
✓ explicit
19/04/2024
Two-week test · Square smartwatch
Verdict
The Amazfit GTS 3 is a light watch with a sharp screen and battery life that matches the claimed 12 days, but it cannot take phone calls.
8.0
china-gadgets.de
≈ estimated
02/08/2023
Hands-on test · Apple Watch-style design
Verdict
The Amazfit GTS 3 is a light, Apple Watch-style smartwatch with a very sharp screen and a crown, but an always-on display halves its battery life.
8.0
sleep-hero.de
≈ estimated
23/08/2022
Sleep-focused test · Fitness smartwatch
Verdict
The Amazfit GTS 3 is a good-looking fitness watch with reliable sleep tracking, a clear pick for buyers who can do without making calls.
navigation-professionell.de
11/11/2021
Not graded yet
vonguru.fr
10/12/2021
Not graded yet
6.0
lesnumeriques.com
✓ explicit
11/04/2022
Hands-on test · Square smartwatch
Verdict
The Amazfit GTS 3 covers the essentials with a sharp screen and solid case, but its interface is basic and the battery lasts about two days.

Third-party reviews

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Amazfit GTS 3

  • Sleek, lightweight design often compared to the Apple Watch
  • Vibrant and sharp AMOLED display with high outdoor visibility
  • Affordable price point compared to high-end competitors
  • Comprehensive health tracking including SpO2, heart rate, and sleep
  • Smooth and intuitive user interface with Zepp OS
  • Accurate built-in GPS for tracking outdoor activities

What we don't like about Amazfit GTS 3

  • Battery life is significantly lower than the claimed 12 days, typically lasting 4-6 days with features enabled
  • Lack of essential smart features like NFC for payments and local music storage
  • No built-in speaker, preventing the ability to take phone calls or hear Alexa responses
  • Very limited selection of third-party apps in the Zepp App Store
  • Occasional software stability issues, including system freezes or restarts
  • Setup process can be lengthy and sometimes unintuitive

Verdict

The Amazfit GTS 3 is a sleek, lightweight smartwatch featuring a 1.75-inch Ultra HD AMOLED display with 341 PPI and up to 1,000 nits brightness, encased in an 8.8mm aircraft-grade aluminium alloy body weighing just 24.4g. Running on Zepp OS, it offers over 150 sports modes, 5 ATM water resistance, and high-precision GPS supporting five satellite systems. Key pros include a dedicated physical crown for navigation, 'one-tap' measurement of four health metrics (heart rate, SpO2, stress, and breathing rate), Alexa integration, and a battery life of up to 12 days. However, notable cons include the lack of a built-in speaker for phone calls, no local music storage, and the absence of NFC for contactless payments.

Compare Amazfit GTS 3 with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Amazfit GTS 3 and other Smartwatches

No results found