OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Smartwatches Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 3,488 independent expert reviews and 5,192 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v2.0

Fire Boltt Cyclone Review | 126 Data compared

Avg. price:~£25Screen size:1.60 inchBattery life:8 daysDisplay type:TFT LCD

Fire Boltt Cyclone Review: Compare 126 technical specifications and 8 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

6.6

Overall score

Score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartwatch's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartwatches on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
Score components

70%

5.9

Technical score

30%

8.0

Review score ( 0 · 8)

Review score 30% · 8.0 · based on 8 videos
8 videos count as 3.8 of the 5 needed; the rest counts as 7/10. Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 30%, technical score 70%. A video or a short review counts less than a full test.
â–¼Worse than 51% of smartwatches
5.9

Technical score

Technical score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
Score components

24%

5.6

Health

21%

6.6

Fitness

16%

6.0

Battery

14%

4.9

Smart features

12%

5.2

Connectivity

9%

6.9

Display & Design

4%

8.1

Hardware

â–¼Worse than 57% of smartwatches
8.0

Review score

Review score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 66% of models
Grades by review (8)
Video reviews 6

10%

9.0

Mic Drop

10%

9.0

IE Tech

10%

9.0

Tech Singh

10%

8.0

Jstech

10%

8.0

Aman Dhingra

5%

9.0

Tech Gali

estimated from the review
8 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
â–²Better than 66% of smartwatches
  • fire-boltt-cyclone
  • fire-boltt-cyclone
  • fire-boltt-cyclone
  • fire-boltt-cyclone
  • fire-boltt-cyclone
  • fire-boltt-cyclone
  • fire-boltt-cyclone
  • fire-boltt-cyclone
  • fire-boltt-cyclone
fire-boltt-cyclone
fire-boltt-cyclone
fire-boltt-cyclone
fire-boltt-cyclone
fire-boltt-cyclone
fire-boltt-cyclone
fire-boltt-cyclone
fire-boltt-cyclone
fire-boltt-cyclone

Best prices

    N/A~ £25

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Fire Boltt Cyclone

Technical score
Technical score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
Score components:

24%

5.6

Health

21%

6.6

Fitness

16%

6.0

Battery

14%

4.9

Smart features

12%

5.2

Connectivity

9%

6.9

Display & Design

4%

8.1

Hardware

5.9
Review score
Review score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 66% of models
Grades by review (8)
Video reviews 6

10%

9.0

Mic Drop

10%

9.0

IE Tech

10%

9.0

Tech Singh

10%

8.0

Jstech

10%

8.0

Aman Dhingra

5%

9.0

Tech Gali

estimated from the review
8 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
8.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 53% of models
Score components:

60%

6.6

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.6
Brand name
Fire
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
â–² Better than 11% of models
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 10.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
â–² Better than 33% of models
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 33.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
ECG
no
â–¼ Worse than 17% of models
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings. 48.2% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
Accelerometer
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.6% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
yes
Barometer
yes
â–² Better than 51% of models
This smartwatch includes a barometer. 50.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
Gyroscope
yes
â–² Better than 30% of models
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 30.2% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
no
Cadence sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 31.2% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
Distance tracking
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 4.1% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
Battery life
8 days
Battery life
8 days
â–² Better than 57% of models
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch offers a battery life of 8 days which is longer than that of 56.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 2.7% of smartwatches.
Battery life in training mode
8 h
Battery life in training mode
8 h
â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
This smartwatch lasts 8 h in training mode which is shorter than 73.4% of smartwatches and equal to that of 3.9% of smartwatches.
8 (with gps), 5 (with bt calling.
Battery life with GPS on
?
Battery power
370 mAh
Battery power
370 mAh
â–² Better than 70% of models
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a battery capacity of 370 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 70.4% of smartwatches and equal to those in 0.7% of smartwatches.
Charge time
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Proprietary OS
Operating system
Proprietary OS
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This smartwatch runs Proprietary OS which is less advanced than the operating system in 53.5% of smartwatches and the same as that in 42.8% of smartwatches.
Software update frequency
ended
Software update frequency
ended
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
This smartwatch has ended software update support which is less active than that of 42.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 57.5% of smartwatches.
Third-party app support
no
Third-party app support
no
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
This smartwatch does not support third-party apps. 47.7% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
Voice assistant support
yes
â–² Better than 32% of models
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 32.4% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
Cellular module
no
â–¼ Worse than 18% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 18% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
â–² Better than 44% of models
This smartwatch supports GPS. 43.9% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
â–¼ Worse than 39% of models
This smartwatch does not support Galileo navigation. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Compass
no
Compass
no
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This smartwatch does not include a compass. 52.7% of smartwatches include a compass.
Show more
Screen size
1.6 inch
Screen size
1.6 inch
â–² Better than 75% of models
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
This smartwatch has a screen size of 1.6 inch which is larger than the screens of 74.5% of smartwatches and equal to those of 1.7% of smartwatches.
Display type
TFT LCD
Display type
TFT LCD
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
This smartwatch uses a TFT LCD display type which is less advanced than that of 74.1% of smartwatches and the same as that of 15.9% of smartwatches.
Resolution
400x 400
Resolution
400x 400
â–² Better than 69% of models
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 400x400 which is higher than that of 69.4% of smartwatches and equal to that of 2.8% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
354 ppi
Pixel density
354 ppi
â–² Better than 62% of models
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 354 ppi which is higher than that of 62.3% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.3% of smartwatches.
Display brightness
?
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
?
Processor model
?
RAM
?
Internal storage
?
External memory slot
no
External memory slot
no
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Fire Boltt Cyclone vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • Blood pressure monitoring
    Blood pressure monitoring
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This smartwatch supports blood pressure monitoring, the average smartwatch does not. 22% of smartwatches support blood pressure monitoring.
  • NFC functionality
    NFC
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 43.4% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • Barometer sensor included
    Barometer
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This smartwatch includes a barometer, the average smartwatch does not. 49.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • Calorie tracking
    Calorie tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.6% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
  • Rugged construction
    Rugged design
    yes
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This smartwatch has a rugged design, the average smartwatch does not. 37.9% of smartwatches have a rugged design.
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    This smartwatch tracks water intake, the average smartwatch does not. 44% of smartwatches track water intake.
  • 0.2 inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    1.60 inch
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
    This smartwatch has a larger screen size than the average smartwatch (1.6 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch screen is 1.40 inch.
    1.60 inch vs 1.40 inch
  • 70 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery life
    370 mAh days
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch has a larger battery capacity than the average smartwatch (370 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    370 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • 5.2x cheaper
    Fire Boltt Cyclone is cheaper than the average smartwatch (£25 vs £130).
    £25 vs £130
  • Blood pressure monitoring
    Blood pressure monitoring
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This smartwatch supports blood pressure monitoring, the average smartwatch does not. 22% of smartwatches support blood pressure monitoring.
  • Calorie tracking
    Calorie tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.6% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    This smartwatch tracks water intake, the average smartwatch does not. 44% of smartwatches track water intake.
  • Barometer sensor included
    Barometer
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This smartwatch includes a barometer, the average smartwatch does not. 49.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • 70 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery life
    370 mAh days
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch has a larger battery capacity than the average smartwatch (370 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    370 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • 1 days day/s longer battery life
    Battery life
    8 days
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 8 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    8 days vs 7 days
  • NFC functionality
    NFC
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 43.4% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • Rugged construction
    Rugged design
    yes
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This smartwatch has a rugged design, the average smartwatch does not. 37.9% of smartwatches have a rugged design.
  • 0.2 inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    1.60 inch
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
    This smartwatch has a larger screen size than the average smartwatch (1.6 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch screen is 1.40 inch.
    1.60 inch vs 1.40 inch
  • 2 year/s newer release date
    Release date
    2023
    â–² Better than 70% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This smartwatch has a newer release date than the average smartwatch (2023 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    July 2023
    2023 vs 2021
  • No elevation tracking
    Elevation tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartwatch does not support elevation tracking, the average smartwatch does. 64.3% of smartwatches support elevation tracking.
  • 49 m lower water resistance depth
    Waterproof depth rating
    1 m
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <1 m – >50 m
    This smartwatch has a shallower waterproof rating than the average smartwatch (1 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch reaches 50 m.
    1 m vs 50 m
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    TFT LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    This smartwatch uses TFT LCD display technology, while the average smartwatch features AMOLED.
    TFT LCD vs AMOLED
  • No automatic activity detection
    Automatic activity detection
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    This smartwatch does not support automatic activity detection, the average smartwatch does. 79.7% of smartwatches support automatic activity detection.
  • No pace tracking
    Pace tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    This smartwatch does not support pace tracking, the average smartwatch does. 78.6% of smartwatches support pace tracking.
  • No coaching features
    Coaching
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 54.6% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • No music playback
    Music playback
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 54.2% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No auto-pause
    Auto pause
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This smartwatch does not support auto pause, the average smartwatch does. 59.3% of smartwatches support auto pause.
  • 6.12x less popular
    Fire Boltt Cyclone has a lower popularity than the average smartwatch (1 vs 6.1).
    1 vs 6.12
  • No cycle tracking
    Menstrual cycle tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartwatch does not support menstrual cycle tracking, the average smartwatch does. 64.3% of smartwatches support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • No smart scale support
    Smart scale compatibility
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support smart scale compatibility, the average smartwatch does. 53.7% of smartwatches support smart scale compatibility.
  • No elevation tracking
    Elevation tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartwatch does not support elevation tracking, the average smartwatch does. 64.3% of smartwatches support elevation tracking.
  • No automatic activity detection
    Automatic activity detection
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    This smartwatch does not support automatic activity detection, the average smartwatch does. 79.7% of smartwatches support automatic activity detection.
  • No pace tracking
    Pace tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    This smartwatch does not support pace tracking, the average smartwatch does. 78.6% of smartwatches support pace tracking.
  • No coaching features
    Coaching
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 54.6% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • No auto-pause
    Auto pause
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This smartwatch does not support auto pause, the average smartwatch does. 59.3% of smartwatches support auto pause.
  • 11.25 h shorter training battery life
    Battery life in training mode
    8 h
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
    This smartwatch lasts less in training mode than the average smartwatch (8 h vs 19.25 h). The average smartwatch lasts 19.25 h.
    8 (with gps), 5 (with bt calling.
    8 h vs 19.25 h
  • Basic battery type
    Battery type
    Li-ion
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartwatch uses a Li-ion battery, while the average smartwatch uses Li-Po.
    Li-ion vs Li-Po
  • No compass
    Compass
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a compass, the average smartwatch does. 52.6% of smartwatches include a compass.
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    TFT LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    This smartwatch uses TFT LCD display technology, while the average smartwatch features AMOLED.
    TFT LCD vs AMOLED
  • 49 m lower water resistance depth
    Waterproof depth rating
    1 m
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <1 m – >50 m
    This smartwatch has a shallower waterproof rating than the average smartwatch (1 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch reaches 50 m.
    1 m vs 50 m
  • No ambient light sensor
    Ambient light sensor
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This smartwatch does not include an ambient light sensor, the average smartwatch does. 60.7% of smartwatches include an ambient light sensor.
  • 15 g heavier weight
    Weight
    60.0 g
    â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is heavier than the average smartwatch (60 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    60.0 g vs 45.0 g
  • 6.8 mm wider watch width
    Width
    48.8 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
    Market range: <34.6 mm – >46.8 mm
    This smartwatch is wider than the average smartwatch (48.8 mm vs 42 mm). The average smartwatch width is 42.0 mm.
    48.8 mm vs 42.0 mm
  • 3.8 mm taller watch height
    Height
    48.8 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <39.5 mm – >51 mm
    This smartwatch is taller than the average smartwatch (48.8 mm vs 45 mm). The average smartwatch height is 45 mm.
    48.8 mm vs 45 mm
  • No music playback
    Music playback
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 54.2% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No calendar sync
    Calendar sync
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    This smartwatch does not support calendar sync, the average smartwatch does. 94.8% of smartwatches support calendar sync.
  • No smart alarm
    Smart alarm
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 52.7% of smartwatches support smart alarms.
  • No widget support
    Widget support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This smartwatch does not support widgets, the average smartwatch does. 83.1% of smartwatches support widgets.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
Jstech
≈ estimated
25/07/2023
Unboxing and review · outdoor mic and battery tests
Verdict
Fire Boltt Cyclone has good looks, many features and a decent mic for the price, but weak battery life and health data.
8.0
Aman Dhingra
≈ estimated
24/07/2023
Hands-on review · design, calling, sensors and gaming
Verdict
Fire Boltt Cyclone suits buyers who like its look, though its health readings seem less accurate.
9.0
Tech Singh
≈ estimated
24/07/2023
Hands-on review · health sensors, workouts and app tests
Verdict
Fire Boltt Cyclone is good value for the money, though it lacks an AMOLED display.
9.0
Tech Gali
≈ estimated
24/07/2023
Unboxing and feature walkthrough · build and straps
Verdict
Fire Boltt Cyclone is a rugged smartwatch with strong design and features, and it is worth buying.
Not graded
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

What reviewers agree on

Based on 0 · 8

Reviewers like the stylish design, rich features and light comfort, but sensor accuracy, data syncing and battery life fall short.
Praised
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Third-party reviews

What we like about Fire Boltt Cyclone

  • High-resolution 1.6-inch round display (400x400 pixels) with a sharp 354 PPI density
  • Unique motion sensor gaming feature that allows interactive gaming actions on the watch
  • Strong value for money with premium features like Bluetooth calling and GPS route tracking at an affordable price
  • Robust and stylish build quality, rated IP68 for water and scratch resistance
  • Long-lasting battery life, with many users reporting up to 8 days of typical usage

What we don't like about Fire Boltt Cyclone

  • Software experience can be laggy and often requires updates to fix responsiveness issues
  • Health sensor accuracy (SpO2, heart rate) is sometimes inconsistent compared to medical-grade devices
  • Display sensitivity is reported as too high by some users, leading to accidental touches
  • Poor after-sales service and difficulties with warranty claims or receiving help for defective units
  • Limited third-party app integration and customisation options for watch faces compared to higher-end models

Verdict

The Fire-Boltt Cyclone is a feature-rich smartwatch featuring a circular 1.6-inch HD TFT display with a 400x400 resolution and a rugged metallic chassis reminiscent of the Apple Watch Ultra. Its core functionality includes Bluetooth calling with an in-built speaker and microphone, NFC for door access and payments, and a suite of health sensors for monitoring heart rate, SpO2, and sleep patterns. Key pros include its impressive 8-day battery life (390mAh battery), IP68 water resistance rating, and unique additions like motion-sensor gaming and integrated GPS route tracking. However, it lacks a high-end AMOLED panel, and some users have noted that the software could be more refined and the touch display can occasionally be overly sensitive.

Compare Fire Boltt Cyclone with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Fire Boltt Cyclone and other Smartwatches

No results found