OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Smartwatches Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 3,488 independent expert reviews and 5,192 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v2.0

Amazfit Bip 3 Review | 126 Data compared

Avg. price:~£25Screen size:1.69 inchBattery life:14 daysDisplay type:TFT LCD

Amazfit Bip 3 Review: Compare 126 technical specifications and 10 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

6.4

Overall score

Score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartwatch's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartwatches on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
Score components

70%

5.6

Technical score

30%

8.0

Review score ( 1 · 9)

Review score 30% · 8.0 · based on 1 written review + 9 videos
1 written review + 9 videos count as 4.8 of the 5 needed; the rest counts as 7/10. Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 30%, technical score 70%. A video or a short review counts less than a full test.
â–¼Worse than 59% of smartwatches
5.6

Technical score

Technical score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
Score components

24%

5.6

Health

21%

7.7

Fitness

16%

6.4

Battery

14%

4.0

Smart features

12%

2.6

Connectivity

9%

5.8

Display & Design

4%

5.4

Hardware

â–¼Worse than 69% of smartwatches
8.0

Review score

Review score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 68% of models
Grades by review (10)
Video reviews 5

10%

9.0

Lim Reviews

10%

8.0

Shane Craig

10%

8.0

The Inventar

10%

8.0

The Modern Creatures

10%

7.0

The Product Reviewer

estimated from the review
1 review, with a printed score. 9 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
â–²Better than 68% of smartwatches
  • amazfit-bip-3
  • amazfit-bip-3
  • amazfit-bip-3
  • amazfit-bip-3
  • amazfit-bip-3
  • amazfit-bip-3
  • amazfit-bip-3
amazfit-bip-3
amazfit-bip-3
amazfit-bip-3
amazfit-bip-3
amazfit-bip-3
amazfit-bip-3
amazfit-bip-3

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Amazfit Bip 3

Technical score
Technical score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
Score components:

24%

5.6

Health

21%

7.7

Fitness

16%

6.4

Battery

14%

4.0

Smart features

12%

2.6

Connectivity

9%

5.8

Display & Design

4%

5.4

Hardware

5.6
Review score
Review score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 68% of models
Grades by review (10)
Video reviews 5

10%

9.0

Lim Reviews

10%

8.0

Shane Craig

10%

8.0

The Inventar

10%

8.0

The Modern Creatures

10%

7.0

The Product Reviewer

estimated from the review
1 review, with a printed score. 9 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
8.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
Score components:

60%

6.4

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.5
Brand name
Amazfit
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
â–² Better than 11% of models
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 10.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
â–² Better than 33% of models
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 33.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
Readings are for wellness use, not medical diagnosis.
ECG
no
ECG
no
â–¼ Worse than 17% of models
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
â–² Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings. 51.9% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
Accelerometer
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.6% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
no
Barometer
no
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
This smartwatch does not include a barometer. 49.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
Gyroscope
yes
â–² Better than 30% of models
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 30.2% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
no
Cadence sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 31.2% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
Distance tracking
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 4.1% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery life
14 days
Battery life
14 days
â–² Better than 77% of models
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch offers a battery life of 14 days which is longer than that of 76.9% of smartwatches and equal to that of 9.2% of smartwatches.
Battery life in training mode
5.5 h
Battery life in training mode
5.5 h
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
This smartwatch lasts 5.5 h in training mode which is shorter than 89.8% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.5% of smartwatches.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery power
280 mAh
Battery power
280 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a battery capacity of 280 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 59.5% of smartwatches and equal to those in 2.8% of smartwatches.
Charge time
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Zepp OS
Operating system
Zepp OS
â–² Better than 60% of models
This smartwatch runs Zepp OS which is more advanced than the operating system in 60.2% of smartwatches and the same as that in 6.5% of smartwatches.
Software update frequency
ended
Software update frequency
ended
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
This smartwatch has ended software update support which is less active than that of 42.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 57.5% of smartwatches.
Third-party app support
no
Third-party app support
no
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
This smartwatch does not support third-party apps. 47.7% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
no
Voice assistant support
no
â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
This smartwatch does not support voice assistants. 67.8% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
Cellular module
no
â–¼ Worse than 18% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 18% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
no
GPS
no
â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
This smartwatch does not support GPS. 56.2% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
â–¼ Worse than 39% of models
This smartwatch does not support Galileo navigation. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Compass
no
Compass
no
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This smartwatch does not include a compass. 52.7% of smartwatches include a compass.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen size
1.69 inch
Screen size
1.69 inch
â–² Better than 80% of models
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
This smartwatch has a screen size of 1.69 inch which is larger than the screens of 79.7% of smartwatches and equal to those of 2.7% of smartwatches.
Display type
TFT LCD
Display type
TFT LCD
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
This smartwatch uses a TFT LCD display type which is less advanced than that of 74.1% of smartwatches and the same as that of 15.9% of smartwatches.
Resolution
240x 280
Resolution
240x 280
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 240x280 which is lower than that of 70.2% of smartwatches and equal to that of 3.6% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
218 ppi
Pixel density
218 ppi
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 218 ppi which is lower than that of 86% of smartwatches and equal to that of 3% of smartwatches.
Display brightness
600 nits
Display brightness
600 nits
â–¼ Worse than 47% of models
Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
This smartwatch reaches 600 nits of display brightness, which is higher than that of 38.8% of smartwatches and equal to that of 14.1% of smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
?
Processor model
Dialog DA14697
Processor model
Dialog DA14697
â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
This smartwatch uses the Dialog DA14697 processor model.
RAM
?
Internal storage
?
External memory slot
no
External memory slot
no
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Amazfit Bip 3 vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • 7 days day/s longer battery life
    Battery life
    14 days
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 14 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    14 days vs 7 days
  • Irregular heart rate alerts
    Irregular heart rate warnings
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does not. 48.1% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • More advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Zepp OS
    â–² Better than 60% of models
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Zepp OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Zepp OS vs Proprietary OS
  • Calorie tracking
    Calorie tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.6% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
    Food logging may require a companion or third-party app.
  • 0.29 inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    1.69 inch
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
    This smartwatch has a larger screen size than the average smartwatch (1.7 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch screen is 1.40 inch.
    1.69 inch vs 1.40 inch
  • 1.95 mm thinner watch body
    Thickness
    9.65 mm
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <9.8 mm – >14.1 mm
    This smartwatch is thinner than the average smartwatch (9.7 mm vs 11.6 mm). The average smartwatch thickness is 11.6 mm.
    9.65 mm vs 11.6 mm
  • 12 g lighter weight
    Weight
    33.0 g
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is lighter than the average smartwatch (33 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    Weight refers to watch case without strap/band.
    33.0 g vs 45.0 g
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.2
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This smartwatch supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average smartwatch (5.2 vs 5). The average smartwatch uses 5.0.
    Bluetooth Low Energy support is indicated.
    5.2 vs 5.0
  • 5.2x cheaper
    Amazfit Bip 3 is cheaper than the average smartwatch (£25 vs £130).
    £25 vs £130
  • 63.4% more popular
    Amazfit Bip 3 has a higher popularity than the average smartwatch (10 vs 6.1).
    10 vs 6.12
  • Irregular heart rate alerts
    Irregular heart rate warnings
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does not. 48.1% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • Calorie tracking
    Calorie tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.6% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
    Food logging may require a companion or third-party app.
  • 7 days day/s longer battery life
    Battery life
    14 days
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 14 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    14 days vs 7 days
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.2
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This smartwatch supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average smartwatch (5.2 vs 5). The average smartwatch uses 5.0.
    Bluetooth Low Energy support is indicated.
    5.2 vs 5.0
  • 0.29 inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    1.69 inch
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
    This smartwatch has a larger screen size than the average smartwatch (1.7 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch screen is 1.40 inch.
    1.69 inch vs 1.40 inch
  • 1.95 mm thinner watch body
    Thickness
    9.65 mm
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <9.8 mm – >14.1 mm
    This smartwatch is thinner than the average smartwatch (9.7 mm vs 11.6 mm). The average smartwatch thickness is 11.6 mm.
    9.65 mm vs 11.6 mm
  • 12 g lighter weight
    Weight
    33.0 g
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is lighter than the average smartwatch (33 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    Weight refers to watch case without strap/band.
    33.0 g vs 45.0 g
  • 2 mm narrower band
    Width of band
    20.0 mm
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    Market range: <20 mm – >22 mm
    This smartwatch has a narrower band width than the average smartwatch (20 mm vs 22 mm). The average smartwatch band is 22.0 mm wide.
    20.0 mm vs 22.0 mm
  • 5.5 mm narrower watch width
    Width
    36.5 mm
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    Market range: <34.6 mm – >46.8 mm
    This smartwatch is narrower than the average smartwatch (36.5 mm vs 42 mm). The average smartwatch width is 42.0 mm.
    36.5 mm vs 42.0 mm
  • More advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Zepp OS
    â–² Better than 60% of models
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Zepp OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Zepp OS vs Proprietary OS
  • No GPS support
    Route support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches support GPS.
  • No multi-sport mode
    Multi-sport mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a multi-sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 68.4% of smartwatches include a multi-sport mode.
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    TFT LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    This smartwatch uses TFT LCD display technology, while the average smartwatch features AMOLED.
    TFT LCD vs AMOLED
  • No coaching features
    Coaching
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 54.6% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • No music playback
    Music playback
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 54.2% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No always-on display
    Always-On Display
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not have an always-on display, the average smartwatch does. 67.6% of smartwatches have an always-on display.
  • 13.75 h shorter training battery life
    Battery life in training mode
    5.5 h
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
    This smartwatch lasts less in training mode than the average smartwatch (5.5 h vs 19.25 h). The average smartwatch lasts 19.25 h.
    5.5 h vs 19.25 h
  • No voice assistant
    Voice assistant support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not support voice assistants, the average smartwatch does. 67.7% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
  • No multi-sport mode
    Multi-sport mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a multi-sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 68.4% of smartwatches include a multi-sport mode.
  • No coaching features
    Coaching
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 54.6% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • No voice feedback
    Voice feedback
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    This smartwatch does not support voice feedback, the average smartwatch does. 61.9% of smartwatches support voice feedback.
  • 20 fewer exercise profiles
    Multi-sport mode
    60
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartwatch supports fewer exercise modes than the average smartwatch (60 vs 80). The average smartwatch supports 80 exercise modes.
    Reported as at least 60 exercise modes.
    60 vs 80
  • 13.75 h shorter training battery life
    Battery life in training mode
    5.5 h
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
    This smartwatch lasts less in training mode than the average smartwatch (5.5 h vs 19.25 h). The average smartwatch lasts 19.25 h.
    5.5 h vs 19.25 h
  • 20 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery life
    280 mAh days
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartwatch (280 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    280 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • No GPS support
    Route support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches support GPS.
  • No compass
    Compass
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a compass, the average smartwatch does. 52.6% of smartwatches include a compass.
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    TFT LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    This smartwatch uses TFT LCD display technology, while the average smartwatch features AMOLED.
    TFT LCD vs AMOLED
  • No always-on display
    Always-On Display
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not have an always-on display, the average smartwatch does. 67.6% of smartwatches have an always-on display.
  • No ambient light sensor
    Ambient light sensor
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This smartwatch does not include an ambient light sensor, the average smartwatch does. 60.7% of smartwatches include an ambient light sensor.
  • 108 ppi lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    218 ppi
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
    This smartwatch has a lower pixel density than the average smartwatch (218 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch display reaches 326 ppi.
    218 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • Lower resolution
    Display type
    240 x 280
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 240x280, while the average smartwatch reaches 352x430.
    240x280 vs 352x430
  • Less practical form
    Form
    square
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This smartwatch uses a square form, while the average smartwatch uses round.
    square vs round
  • No music playback
    Music playback
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 54.2% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No voice assistant
    Voice assistant support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not support voice assistants, the average smartwatch does. 67.7% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
  • No call answering
    Call answering
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This smartwatch does not support call answering, the average smartwatch does. 58.1% of smartwatches support call answering.
  • No voice command support
    Voice commands
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartwatch does not support voice commands, the average smartwatch does. 67% of smartwatches support voice commands.
  • No passcode
    Passcode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not include passcode protection, the average smartwatch does. 67.8% of smartwatches include passcode protection.
  • No gesture control
    Gesture control
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    This smartwatch does not support gesture control, the average smartwatch does. 77.7% of smartwatches support gesture control.
  • No speaker
    Built-in speaker
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.
  • 1 fewer microphones
    Number of microphones
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    Market range: <0 – >1
    This smartwatch has fewer microphones than the average smartwatch (0 vs 1). The average smartwatch includes 1 microphones.
    0 vs 1

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
Shane Craig
≈ estimated
02/06/2023
Long-term test · several weeks of daily use
Verdict
Amazfit Bip 3 is not accurate for sleep or heart rate, but it is a very capable, easy-to-switch watch for basic tracking.
8.0
The Inventar
≈ estimated
16/07/2022
Long-term test · two weeks of daily use
Verdict
Amazfit Bip 3 has good battery life and sports features, but scratches and clumsy controls are real drawbacks.
Not graded
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

What reviewers agree on

Based on 5 · 10

Reviewers love the battery life, comfort and sport modes, but the GPS falls short and health tracking divides opinion.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.6
robadainformatici.it
✓ explicit
29/04/2023
Full review · Fitness smartwatch
Verdict
The Amazfit Bip 3 is a light fitness watch with about two weeks of battery, but without GPS or NFC it only works alongside a phone.

Third-party reviews

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Amazfit Bip 3

  • Exceptional battery life, often lasting 7 to 14 days depending on usage.
  • Great value for money, offering many features at a low price point.
  • Lightweight and comfortable design, making it easy to wear all day and night.
  • Simple and intuitive setup process through the Zepp companion app.
  • Large 1.69-inch color display that is easy to read indoors.
  • Water-resistant up to 5 ATM, suitable for swimming and showering.

What we don't like about Amazfit Bip 3

  • Patchy heart rate accuracy, especially during high-intensity exercise.
  • Lack of automatic brightness adjustment, requiring manual changes for outdoor use.
  • TFT display can be difficult to read in direct sunlight and lacks an 'always-on' mode.
  • Limited notification functionality; users can view but cannot reply to messages.
  • Inaccurate step counting in certain scenarios, such as when hands are stationary.
  • The plastic build and strap can feel cheap or cause discomfort for some users.

Verdict

The Amazfit Bip 3 is a budget-friendly smartwatch featuring a 1.69-inch TFT color display with a 240x280 resolution, a 280mAh battery offering up to 14 days of typical use, and 5 ATM water resistance. Its core strengths include comprehensive health monitoring via the BioTracker 2 PPG sensor (heart rate, SpO2, and sleep tracking), over 60 sports modes, and a lightweight 33g design. However, it lacks built-in GPS (relying on a connected smartphone), lacks an AMOLED panel for better brightness, and has faced criticism for inconsistent heart rate accuracy and a screen that can appear pixelated.

Compare Amazfit Bip 3 with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Amazfit Bip 3 and other Smartwatches

No results found