OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Smartwatches Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 3,488 independent expert reviews and 5,192 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v2.0

Fire Boltt Apollo 2 Review | 126 Data compared

Avg. price:~£25Screen size:1.43 inchBattery life:7 daysDisplay type:AMOLED

Fire Boltt Apollo 2 Review: Compare 126 technical specifications and 5 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

6.6

Overall score

Score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartwatch's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartwatches on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 50% of models
Score components

70%

6.2

Technical score

30%

7.6

Review score ( 1 · 4)

Review score 30% · 7.6 · based on 1 written review + 4 videos
1 written review + 4 videos count as 3 of the 5 needed; the rest counts as 7/10. Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 30%, technical score 70%. A video or a short review counts less than a full test.
â–²Better than 50% of smartwatches
6.2

Technical score

Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 50% of models
Score components

24%

7.1

Health

21%

8.3

Fitness

16%

4.6

Battery

14%

5.6

Smart features

12%

3.1

Connectivity

9%

6.6

Display & Design

4%

7.0

Hardware

â–²Better than 50% of smartwatches
7.6

Review score

Review score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
Grades by review (5)
Text reviews 1
✓ explicit
1

20%

7.4

smartgearhq.com

Video reviews 3

10%

9.0

Blue Boy

10%

9.0

Tech At 6

10%

8.0

ANUPAM Dev official

estimated from the review
1 review, with a printed score. 4 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 54% of smartwatches
  • fire-boltt-apollo-2
  • fire-boltt-apollo-2
  • fire-boltt-apollo-2
  • fire-boltt-apollo-2
  • fire-boltt-apollo-2
  • fire-boltt-apollo-2
  • fire-boltt-apollo-2
  • fire-boltt-apollo-2
  • fire-boltt-apollo-2
  • fire-boltt-apollo-2
  • fire-boltt-apollo-2
  • fire-boltt-apollo-2
  • fire-boltt-apollo-2
  • fire-boltt-apollo-2
fire-boltt-apollo-2
fire-boltt-apollo-2
fire-boltt-apollo-2
fire-boltt-apollo-2
fire-boltt-apollo-2
fire-boltt-apollo-2
fire-boltt-apollo-2
fire-boltt-apollo-2
fire-boltt-apollo-2
fire-boltt-apollo-2
fire-boltt-apollo-2
fire-boltt-apollo-2
fire-boltt-apollo-2
fire-boltt-apollo-2

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Fire Boltt Apollo 2

Technical score
Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 50% of models
Score components:

24%

7.1

Health

21%

8.3

Fitness

16%

4.6

Battery

14%

5.6

Smart features

12%

3.1

Connectivity

9%

6.6

Display & Design

4%

7.0

Hardware

6.2
Review score
Review score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
Grades by review (5)
Text reviews 1
✓ explicit
1

20%

7.4

smartgearhq.com

Video reviews 3

10%

9.0

Blue Boy

10%

9.0

Tech At 6

10%

8.0

ANUPAM Dev official

estimated from the review
1 review, with a printed score. 4 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
7.6
Value for money
Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 53% of models
Score components:

60%

6.6

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.6
Brand name
Fire
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
â–² Better than 11% of models
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 10.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
â–² Better than 33% of models
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 33.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
ECG
no
â–¼ Worse than 17% of models
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings. 48.2% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
Show more
Accelerometer
yes
Accelerometer
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.6% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
yes
Barometer
yes
â–² Better than 51% of models
This smartwatch includes a barometer. 50.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
Gyroscope
yes
â–² Better than 30% of models
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 30.2% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
no
Cadence sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 31.2% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
Distance tracking
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 4.1% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
Battery life
7 days
Battery life
7 days
â–¼ Worse than 44% of models
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch offers a battery life of 7 days which is longer than that of 38.7% of smartwatches and equal to that of 17.1% of smartwatches.
Battery life in training mode
13 h
Battery life in training mode
13 h
â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
This smartwatch lasts 13 h in training mode which is shorter than 60.1% of smartwatches and equal to that of 1.7% of smartwatches.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery power
250 mAh
Battery power
250 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a battery capacity of 250 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 70.6% of smartwatches and equal to those in 1.5% of smartwatches.
Charge time
120 min
Charge time
120 min
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges in 120 min which is faster than 13.1% of smartwatches and equal to the charge time of 44.2% of smartwatches.
Show more
Operating system
Proprietary OS
Operating system
Proprietary OS
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This smartwatch runs Proprietary OS which is less advanced than the operating system in 53.5% of smartwatches and the same as that in 42.8% of smartwatches.
Software update frequency
ended
Software update frequency
ended
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
This smartwatch has ended software update support which is less active than that of 42.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 57.5% of smartwatches.
Third-party app support
no
Third-party app support
no
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
This smartwatch does not support third-party apps. 47.7% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
Voice assistant support
yes
â–² Better than 32% of models
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 32.4% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
Cellular module
no
â–¼ Worse than 18% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 18% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
no
GPS
no
â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
This smartwatch does not support GPS. 56.2% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
â–¼ Worse than 39% of models
This smartwatch does not support Galileo navigation. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Compass
yes
Compass
yes
â–² Better than 47% of models
This smartwatch includes a compass. 47.5% of smartwatches include a compass.
Show more
Screen size
1.43 inch
Screen size
1.43 inch
â–² Better than 56% of models
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
This smartwatch has a screen size of 1.43 inch which is larger than the screens of 56.3% of smartwatches and equal to those of 8.2% of smartwatches.
Display type
AMOLED
Display type
AMOLED
â–² Better than 50% of models
This smartwatch uses a AMOLED display type which is more advanced than that of 49.9% of smartwatches and the same as that of 50.1% of smartwatches.
Resolution
466x 466
Resolution
466x 466
â–² Better than 87% of models
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 466x466 which is higher than that of 87.4% of smartwatches and equal to that of 10.9% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
461 ppi
Pixel density
461 ppi
â–² Better than 84% of models
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 461 ppi which is higher than that of 84.5% of smartwatches and equal to that of 6.5% of smartwatches.
Display brightness
600 nits
Display brightness
600 nits
â–¼ Worse than 47% of models
Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
This smartwatch reaches 600 nits of display brightness, which is higher than that of 38.8% of smartwatches and equal to that of 14.1% of smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
?
Processor model
?
RAM
?
Internal storage
0.125 GB
Internal storage
0.125 GB
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch uses 0.125 GB for internal storage which is smaller than that of 66.8% of smartwatches and equal to that of 3.4% of smartwatches.
128 MB internal storage
External memory slot
no
External memory slot
no
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Fire Boltt Apollo 2 vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • Blood pressure monitoring
    Blood pressure monitoring
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This smartwatch supports blood pressure monitoring, the average smartwatch does not. 22% of smartwatches support blood pressure monitoring.
  • VO2 max measurement
    VO2 max measurement
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch measures VO2 max, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • External heart rate monitor support
    External heart rate monitor compatibility
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports external heart rate monitor compatibility, the average smartwatch does not. 42.7% of smartwatches support external heart rate monitor compatibility.
  • Barometer sensor included
    Barometer
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This smartwatch includes a barometer, the average smartwatch does not. 49.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • Calorie tracking
    Calorie tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.6% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
  • 135 ppi higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    461 ppi
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
    This smartwatch has a higher pixel density than the average smartwatch (461 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch display reaches 326 ppi.
    461 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • Weight tracking
    Weight tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This smartwatch supports weight tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 39.1% of smartwatches support weight tracking.
    Tracked through the companion app or smart-scale sync.
  • 30 more exercise profiles
    Multi-sport mode
    110
    â–² Better than 32% of models
    This smartwatch supports more exercise modes than the average smartwatch (110 vs 80). The average smartwatch supports 80 exercise modes.
    Reported as at least 110 exercise modes.
    110 vs 80
  • 5.2x cheaper
    Fire Boltt Apollo 2 is cheaper than the average smartwatch (£25 vs £130).
    £25 vs £130
  • Blood pressure monitoring
    Blood pressure monitoring
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This smartwatch supports blood pressure monitoring, the average smartwatch does not. 22% of smartwatches support blood pressure monitoring.
  • VO2 max measurement
    VO2 max measurement
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch measures VO2 max, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • Calorie tracking
    Calorie tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.6% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
  • Weight tracking
    Weight tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This smartwatch supports weight tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 39.1% of smartwatches support weight tracking.
    Tracked through the companion app or smart-scale sync.
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    This smartwatch tracks water intake, the average smartwatch does not. 44% of smartwatches track water intake.
  • External heart rate monitor support
    External heart rate monitor compatibility
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports external heart rate monitor compatibility, the average smartwatch does not. 42.7% of smartwatches support external heart rate monitor compatibility.
  • Barometer sensor included
    Barometer
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This smartwatch includes a barometer, the average smartwatch does not. 49.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • 30 more exercise profiles
    Multi-sport mode
    110
    â–² Better than 32% of models
    This smartwatch supports more exercise modes than the average smartwatch (110 vs 80). The average smartwatch supports 80 exercise modes.
    Reported as at least 110 exercise modes.
    110 vs 80
  • 135 ppi higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    461 ppi
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
    This smartwatch has a higher pixel density than the average smartwatch (461 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch display reaches 326 ppi.
    461 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • 1.6 mm thinner watch body
    Thickness
    10.00 mm
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <9.8 mm – >14.1 mm
    This smartwatch is thinner than the average smartwatch (10 mm vs 11.6 mm). The average smartwatch thickness is 11.6 mm.
    10.00 mm vs 11.6 mm
  • Higher resolution
    Display type
    466 x 466
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 466x466, while the average smartwatch reaches 352x430.
    466x466 vs 352x430
  • 2 year/s newer release date
    Release date
    2023
    â–² Better than 70% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This smartwatch has a newer release date than the average smartwatch (2023 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    June 2023
    2023 vs 2021
  • No GPS support
    Route support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches support GPS.
  • 49 m lower water resistance depth
    Waterproof depth rating
    1 m
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <1 m – >50 m
    This smartwatch has a shallower waterproof rating than the average smartwatch (1 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch reaches 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1 m vs 50 m
  • No route tracking
    Route support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch does not support route tracking, the average smartwatch does. 74.6% of smartwatches support route tracking.
  • No auto-pause
    Auto pause
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This smartwatch does not support auto pause, the average smartwatch does. 59.3% of smartwatches support auto pause.
  • Lower IP rating
    IP rating
    IP67
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartwatch has a lower IP rating than the average smartwatch (IP67 vs IP68).
    IP67 vs IP68
  • No ambient light sensor
    Ambient light sensor
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This smartwatch does not include an ambient light sensor, the average smartwatch does. 60.7% of smartwatches include an ambient light sensor.
  • No live tracking
    Live tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    This smartwatch does not support live tracking, the average smartwatch does. 88.6% of smartwatches support live tracking.
  • No smart scale support
    Smart scale compatibility
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support smart scale compatibility, the average smartwatch does. 53.7% of smartwatches support smart scale compatibility.
  • No smart scale support
    Smart scale compatibility
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support smart scale compatibility, the average smartwatch does. 53.7% of smartwatches support smart scale compatibility.
  • No route tracking
    Route support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch does not support route tracking, the average smartwatch does. 74.6% of smartwatches support route tracking.
  • No auto-pause
    Auto pause
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This smartwatch does not support auto pause, the average smartwatch does. 59.3% of smartwatches support auto pause.
  • No live tracking
    Live tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    This smartwatch does not support live tracking, the average smartwatch does. 88.6% of smartwatches support live tracking.
  • Basic battery type
    Battery type
    Li-ion
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartwatch uses a Li-ion battery, while the average smartwatch uses Li-Po.
    Li-ion vs Li-Po
  • 6.25 h shorter training battery life
    Battery life in training mode
    13 h
    â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
    Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
    This smartwatch lasts less in training mode than the average smartwatch (13 h vs 19.25 h). The average smartwatch lasts 19.25 h.
    13 h vs 19.25 h
  • 50 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery life
    250 mAh days
    â–¼ Worse than 44% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartwatch (250 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    250 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • No GPS support
    Route support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches support GPS.
  • 49 m lower water resistance depth
    Waterproof depth rating
    1 m
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <1 m – >50 m
    This smartwatch has a shallower waterproof rating than the average smartwatch (1 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch reaches 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1 m vs 50 m
  • Lower IP rating
    IP rating
    IP67
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartwatch has a lower IP rating than the average smartwatch (IP67 vs IP68).
    IP67 vs IP68
  • No ambient light sensor
    Ambient light sensor
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This smartwatch does not include an ambient light sensor, the average smartwatch does. 60.7% of smartwatches include an ambient light sensor.
  • 15 g heavier weight
    Weight
    60.0 g
    â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is heavier than the average smartwatch (60 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    Weight includes strap/bracelet.
    60.0 g vs 45.0 g
  • No widget support
    Widget support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This smartwatch does not support widgets, the average smartwatch does. 83.1% of smartwatches support widgets.
  • 3.88 GB less storage
    Internal storage
    0.125 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
    This smartwatch offers less internal storage than the average smartwatch (0.1 GB vs 4 GB). The average smartwatch provides 4 GB of storage.
    128 MB internal storage
    0.125 GB vs 4 GB

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

7.0
Venom's Tech
≈ estimated
09/07/2023
Hands-on review · display, features and watch UI
Verdict
Fire Boltt Apollo 2 is worth waiting for a price drop, since it is a good choice at its launch price.
8.0
ANUPAM Dev official
≈ estimated
26/06/2023
Unboxing and detail review · features walkthrough and tests
Verdict
Fire Boltt Apollo 2 offers good features for the price, so it is worth a look if you want a round-display smartwatch.
9.0
Tech At 6
≈ estimated
23/06/2023
Unboxing and review · display, features and accuracy checks
Verdict
Fire Boltt Apollo 2 is a solid smartwatch for its price if you do not need precise health readings.
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

What reviewers agree on

Based on 1 · 4

Reviewers agree the display looks great, calls work well and customisation is generous, with barely any complaints.
Praised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

7.4
smartgearhq.com
✓ explicit
04/07/2026
Two-week test · Square display
Verdict
The Fire-Boltt Apollo 2 is a sensible pick for a big screen and about a week of battery, but it is a bulky watch and calls suffer in wind.

Third-party reviews

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Fire Boltt Apollo 2

  • Premium, stylish design featuring a metallic body and rotating crown
  • Vibrant 1.43-inch AMOLED display with high resolution and smooth touch response
  • Excellent value for money, often described as a best buy at its price point
  • Long-lasting battery backup (up to 7 days normal usage) with fast charging capabilities
  • Comprehensive health suite including SpO2, heart rate, sleep tracking, and 110+ sports modes
  • Reliable Bluetooth calling functionality with clear sound and built-in voice assistant

What we don't like about Fire Boltt Apollo 2

  • Durability issues reported with some side buttons failing after a few months of use
  • Poor customer service experience, with reports of delayed responses and difficulty claiming warranty
  • Occasional quality control problems, such as defective displays or units failing to turn on
  • Sensors may show inconsistent results (e.g., heart rate monitoring on inanimate objects)
  • Higher battery consumption when using Always-On Display (AOD) or high pixel density settings
  • Lack of GPS and NFC, which may limit functionality compared to other models

Verdict

The Fire-Boltt Apollo 2 is a feature-rich budget smartwatch featuring a circular 1.43-inch AMOLED display with a high resolution of 466x466 pixels and 461 PPI density for sharp visuals. It is equipped with Bluetooth 5.0 for hands-free calling via an in-built speaker and microphone, alongside AI voice assistant support and over 110 sports modes. Its health suite includes 24/7 heart rate monitoring, SpO2 tracking, sleep analysis, and a female health tracker, all housed in a metallic frame with an IP67 water and dust resistance rating. Main pros include its vibrant Always-On Display, premium build quality, and a battery life that lasts up to 7 days on normal use (2 days with calling). However, it lacks built-in GPS, its SpO2 readings can sometimes be inconsistent compared to medical devices, and it lacks advanced 'raise to wake' or 'double tap to wake' functionality.

Compare Fire Boltt Apollo 2 with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Fire Boltt Apollo 2 and other Smartwatches

No results found