OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Smartwatches Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 3,488 independent expert reviews and 5,192 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v2.0

Fire Boltt Artillery Review | 126 Data compared

Avg. price:~£25Screen size:1.50 inchBattery life:8 daysDisplay type:TFT LCD

Fire Boltt Artillery Review: Compare 126 technical specifications and 11 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

6.6

Overall score

Score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartwatch's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartwatches on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 50% of models
Score components

70%

6.1

Technical score

30%

7.9

Review score ( 0 · 11)

Review score 30% · 7.9 · based on 11 independent reviews
Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 30%, technical score 70%. This model has enough reviews, so its review score is the weighted average of their grades.
â–²Better than 50% of smartwatches
6.1

Technical score

Technical score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
Score components

24%

5.6

Health

21%

6.7

Fitness

16%

6.8

Battery

14%

5.1

Smart features

12%

5.3

Connectivity

9%

6.3

Display & Design

4%

8.1

Hardware

â–¼Worse than 53% of smartwatches
7.9

Review score

Review score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 58% of models
Grades by review (11)
Video reviews 8

10%

7.0

Digital Gyan

10%

9.0

Aman Dhingra

10%

8.0

ANUPAM Dev official

10%

8.0

DAYbyDAY Tech

10%

8.0

Blue Boy

10%

8.0

Tech Unboxing

10%

7.0

WhySoTechie

5%

8.0

Jstech

estimated from the review
11 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
â–²Better than 58% of smartwatches
  • fire-boltt-artillery
  • fire-boltt-artillery
  • fire-boltt-artillery
  • fire-boltt-artillery
  • fire-boltt-artillery
  • fire-boltt-artillery
  • fire-boltt-artillery
  • fire-boltt-artillery
  • fire-boltt-artillery
  • fire-boltt-artillery
  • fire-boltt-artillery
  • fire-boltt-artillery
  • fire-boltt-artillery
fire-boltt-artillery
fire-boltt-artillery
fire-boltt-artillery
fire-boltt-artillery
fire-boltt-artillery
fire-boltt-artillery
fire-boltt-artillery
fire-boltt-artillery
fire-boltt-artillery
fire-boltt-artillery
fire-boltt-artillery
fire-boltt-artillery
fire-boltt-artillery

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Fire Boltt Artillery

Technical score
Technical score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
Score components:

24%

5.6

Health

21%

6.7

Fitness

16%

6.8

Battery

14%

5.1

Smart features

12%

5.3

Connectivity

9%

6.3

Display & Design

4%

8.1

Hardware

6.1
Review score
Review score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 58% of models
Grades by review (11)
Video reviews 8

10%

7.0

Digital Gyan

10%

9.0

Aman Dhingra

10%

8.0

ANUPAM Dev official

10%

8.0

DAYbyDAY Tech

10%

8.0

Blue Boy

10%

8.0

Tech Unboxing

10%

7.0

WhySoTechie

5%

8.0

Jstech

estimated from the review
11 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
7.9
Value for money
Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 53% of models
Score components:

60%

6.6

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.6
Brand name
Fire
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
â–² Better than 11% of models
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 10.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
â–² Better than 33% of models
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 33.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
ECG
no
â–¼ Worse than 17% of models
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings. 48.2% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
Accelerometer
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.6% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
no
Barometer
no
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
This smartwatch does not include a barometer. 49.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
Gyroscope
yes
â–² Better than 30% of models
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 30.2% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
no
Cadence sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 31.2% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
no
Distance tracking
no
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
This smartwatch does not support distance tracking. 96% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
Battery life
8 days
Battery life
8 days
â–² Better than 57% of models
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch offers a battery life of 8 days which is longer than that of 56.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 2.7% of smartwatches.
Up to 5 days with bluetooth calling.
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life with GPS on
?
Battery power
460 mAh
Battery power
460 mAh
â–² Better than 87% of models
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a battery capacity of 460 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 87.3% of smartwatches and equal to those in 0.4% of smartwatches.
Charge time
180 min
Charge time
180 min
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges in 180 min which is slower than 96.1% of smartwatches and equal to the charge time of 2.1% of smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Proprietary OS
Operating system
Proprietary OS
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This smartwatch runs Proprietary OS which is less advanced than the operating system in 53.5% of smartwatches and the same as that in 42.8% of smartwatches.
Software update frequency
ended
Software update frequency
ended
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
This smartwatch has ended software update support which is less active than that of 42.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 57.5% of smartwatches.
Third-party app support
no
Third-party app support
no
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
This smartwatch does not support third-party apps. 47.7% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
Voice assistant support
yes
â–² Better than 32% of models
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 32.4% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
Cellular module
no
â–¼ Worse than 18% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 18% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
1
SIM cards
1
â–² Better than 2% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This smartwatch uses 1 for cellular connectivity which is more advanced than that of 2% of smartwatches and the same as that of 98% of smartwatches.
eSIM
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
â–² Better than 44% of models
This smartwatch supports GPS. 43.9% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
â–¼ Worse than 39% of models
This smartwatch does not support Galileo navigation. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Compass
no
Compass
no
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This smartwatch does not include a compass. 52.7% of smartwatches include a compass.
Show more
Screen size
1.5 inch
Screen size
1.5 inch
â–² Better than 66% of models
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
This smartwatch has a screen size of 1.5 inch which is larger than the screens of 66.2% of smartwatches and equal to those of 3.3% of smartwatches.
Display type
TFT LCD
Display type
TFT LCD
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
This smartwatch uses a TFT LCD display type which is less advanced than that of 74.1% of smartwatches and the same as that of 15.9% of smartwatches.
Resolution
400x 400
Resolution
400x 400
â–² Better than 69% of models
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 400x400 which is higher than that of 69.4% of smartwatches and equal to that of 2.8% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
377 ppi
Pixel density
377 ppi
â–² Better than 65% of models
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 377 ppi which is higher than that of 64.6% of smartwatches.
Display brightness
600 nits
Display brightness
600 nits
â–¼ Worse than 47% of models
Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
This smartwatch reaches 600 nits of display brightness, which is higher than that of 38.8% of smartwatches and equal to that of 14.1% of smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
?
Processor model
?
RAM
?
Internal storage
?
External memory slot
no
External memory slot
no
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more
What reviewers say

Fire Boltt Artillery vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • Blood pressure monitoring
    Blood pressure monitoring
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This smartwatch supports blood pressure monitoring, the average smartwatch does not. 22% of smartwatches support blood pressure monitoring.
  • Supports wireless charging
    Wireless charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    This smartwatch supports wireless charging, the average smartwatch does not. 24.5% of smartwatches support wireless charging.
  • NFC functionality
    NFC
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 43.4% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • Rugged construction
    Rugged design
    yes
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This smartwatch has a rugged design, the average smartwatch does not. 37.9% of smartwatches have a rugged design.
    Rugged design supported by MIL-STD/military-grade durability claim.
  • 160 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery life
    460 mAh days
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch has a larger battery capacity than the average smartwatch (460 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    Up to 5 days with bluetooth calling.
    460 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • Route support
    Route support
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch supports route support, the average smartwatch does not. 50% of smartwatches support route support.
    Route support available via companion app.
  • 1 days day/s longer battery life
    Battery life
    8 days
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 8 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    Up to 5 days with bluetooth calling.
    8 days vs 7 days
  • 2 year/s newer release date
    Release date
    2023
    â–² Better than 70% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This smartwatch has a newer release date than the average smartwatch (2023 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    June 2023
    2023 vs 2021
  • 5.2x cheaper
    Fire Boltt Artillery is cheaper than the average smartwatch (£25 vs £130).
    £25 vs £130
  • Blood pressure monitoring
    Blood pressure monitoring
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This smartwatch supports blood pressure monitoring, the average smartwatch does not. 22% of smartwatches support blood pressure monitoring.
  • Route support
    Route support
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch supports route support, the average smartwatch does not. 50% of smartwatches support route support.
    Route support available via companion app.
  • 20 more exercise profiles
    Multi-sport mode
    100
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartwatch supports more exercise modes than the average smartwatch (100 vs 80). The average smartwatch supports 80 exercise modes.
    Reported as at least 100 exercise modes.
    100 vs 80
  • Supports wireless charging
    Wireless charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    This smartwatch supports wireless charging, the average smartwatch does not. 24.5% of smartwatches support wireless charging.
  • 160 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery life
    460 mAh days
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch has a larger battery capacity than the average smartwatch (460 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    Up to 5 days with bluetooth calling.
    460 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • 1 days day/s longer battery life
    Battery life
    8 days
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 8 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    Up to 5 days with bluetooth calling.
    8 days vs 7 days
  • NFC functionality
    NFC
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 43.4% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • Rugged construction
    Rugged design
    yes
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This smartwatch has a rugged design, the average smartwatch does not. 37.9% of smartwatches have a rugged design.
    Rugged design supported by MIL-STD/military-grade durability claim.
  • 0.1 inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    1.50 inch
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
    This smartwatch has a larger screen size than the average smartwatch (1.5 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch screen is 1.40 inch.
    1.50 inch vs 1.40 inch
  • 51 ppi higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    377 ppi
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
    This smartwatch has a higher pixel density than the average smartwatch (377 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch display reaches 326 ppi.
    377 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • 2 year/s newer release date
    Release date
    2023
    â–² Better than 70% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This smartwatch has a newer release date than the average smartwatch (2023 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    June 2023
    2023 vs 2021
  • No multi-sport mode
    Multi-sport mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a multi-sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 68.4% of smartwatches include a multi-sport mode.
  • 49 m lower water resistance depth
    Waterproof depth rating
    1 m
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <1 m – >50 m
    This smartwatch has a shallower waterproof rating than the average smartwatch (1 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch reaches 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1 m vs 50 m
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    TFT LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    This smartwatch uses TFT LCD display technology, while the average smartwatch features AMOLED.
    TFT LCD vs AMOLED
  • No coaching features
    Coaching
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 54.6% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • No auto-pause
    Auto pause
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This smartwatch does not support auto pause, the average smartwatch does. 59.3% of smartwatches support auto pause.
  • No distance tracking
    Distance tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
    This smartwatch does not support distance tracking, the average smartwatch does. 95.9% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
  • No compass
    Compass
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a compass, the average smartwatch does. 52.6% of smartwatches include a compass.
  • No voice command support
    Voice commands
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartwatch does not support voice commands, the average smartwatch does. 67% of smartwatches support voice commands.
  • No smart scale support
    Smart scale compatibility
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support smart scale compatibility, the average smartwatch does. 53.7% of smartwatches support smart scale compatibility.
  • No multi-sport mode
    Multi-sport mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a multi-sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 68.4% of smartwatches include a multi-sport mode.
  • No coaching features
    Coaching
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 54.6% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • No auto-pause
    Auto pause
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This smartwatch does not support auto pause, the average smartwatch does. 59.3% of smartwatches support auto pause.
  • No distance tracking
    Distance tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
    This smartwatch does not support distance tracking, the average smartwatch does. 95.9% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
  • No achievement tracking
    Achievements
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    This smartwatch does not support achievements, the average smartwatch does. 85.8% of smartwatches support achievements.
  • Basic battery type
    Battery type
    Li-ion
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartwatch uses a Li-ion battery, while the average smartwatch uses Li-Po.
    Li-ion vs Li-Po
  • 60 min longer charge time
    Charge time
    180 min
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
    Market range: <60 min – >150 min
    This smartwatch charges slower than the average smartwatch (180 min vs 120 min). The average smartwatch charges in 120 min.
    180 min vs 120 min
  • No compass
    Compass
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a compass, the average smartwatch does. 52.6% of smartwatches include a compass.
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    TFT LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    This smartwatch uses TFT LCD display technology, while the average smartwatch features AMOLED.
    TFT LCD vs AMOLED
  • 49 m lower water resistance depth
    Waterproof depth rating
    1 m
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <1 m – >50 m
    This smartwatch has a shallower waterproof rating than the average smartwatch (1 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch reaches 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1 m vs 50 m
  • No ambient light sensor
    Ambient light sensor
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This smartwatch does not include an ambient light sensor, the average smartwatch does. 60.7% of smartwatches include an ambient light sensor.
  • 2.4 mm thicker watch body
    Thickness
    14.00 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    Market range: <9.8 mm – >14.1 mm
    This smartwatch is thicker than the average smartwatch (14 mm vs 11.6 mm). The average smartwatch thickness is 11.6 mm.
    14.00 mm vs 11.6 mm
  • 15 g heavier weight
    Weight
    60.0 g
    â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is heavier than the average smartwatch (60 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    60.0 g vs 45.0 g
  • 10 mm taller watch height
    Height
    55.0 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <39.5 mm – >51 mm
    This smartwatch is taller than the average smartwatch (55 mm vs 45 mm). The average smartwatch height is 45 mm.
    55.0 mm vs 45 mm
  • 8 mm wider watch width
    Width
    50.0 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
    Market range: <34.6 mm – >46.8 mm
    This smartwatch is wider than the average smartwatch (50 mm vs 42 mm). The average smartwatch width is 42.0 mm.
    50.0 mm vs 42.0 mm
  • No voice command support
    Voice commands
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartwatch does not support voice commands, the average smartwatch does. 67% of smartwatches support voice commands.
  • No calendar sync
    Calendar sync
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    This smartwatch does not support calendar sync, the average smartwatch does. 94.8% of smartwatches support calendar sync.
  • No smart alarm
    Smart alarm
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 52.7% of smartwatches support smart alarms.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
DAYbyDAY Tech
≈ estimated
23/06/2023
Hands-on review · features, health sensors, calling
Verdict
Fire Boltt Artillery is a better-than-expected choice for its price, though its health sensors and some call features fall short.
8.0
Tech Unboxing
≈ estimated
21/06/2023
Unboxing and review · features, battery and app tour
Verdict
Fire Boltt Artillery is a feature-loaded watch with good value for the price, though swimming mode and Hindi SMS are missing.
9.0
Aman Dhingra
≈ estimated
21/06/2023
Hands-on review · gaming, calling, drop test
Verdict
Fire Boltt Artillery has a rugged design, a sharp display and an unusual motion gaming feature worth the money.
8.0
Jstech
≈ estimated
23/06/2023
Unboxing · feature walkthrough and call test
Verdict
Fire Boltt Artillery meets expectations at its price, despite slow charging and unreliable health sensors.
Not graded
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

What reviewers agree on

Based on 0 · 11

Reviewers praise the tough build, good value and solid display, but the health sensors and companion app clearly disappoint.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Third-party reviews

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Fire Boltt Artillery

  • Rugged and premium metallic body design with a large 1.5-inch display
  • Support for Bluetooth calling with a built-in speaker and microphone
  • Comprehensive health suite including SpO2, heart rate tracking, and sleep monitoring
  • Unique features such as NFC support and motion sensor gaming
  • Good battery life, typically lasting 5 to 8 days depending on usage
  • Highly affordable pricing, often positioned as a top value-for-money choice in the budget segment

What we don't like about Fire Boltt Artillery

  • Sensors are not medical-grade and can sometimes provide inconsistent or inaccurate readings
  • Lacks 4G/LTE connectivity, making it dependent on a smartphone for most smart features
  • The display is an IPS LCD rather than AMOLED, which can result in lower visibility in direct sunlight
  • Software experience can be limited by an unintuitive app interface and lack of sync with third-party apps like Strava
  • Customer service and warranty support have been frequently reported as poor or unresponsive by users
  • Water resistance (IP68) may not be reliable for swimming or heavy water exposure according to some user reports

Verdict

The Fire-Boltt Artillery is a rugged military-grade smartwatch featuring a circular 1.5-inch HD TFT display with a sharp 400x400 pixel resolution and 600 nits peak brightness. Its core identity is built around durability and a unique motion sensor gaming feature, complemented by a 320 mAh battery that provides up to 8 days of use and supports wireless charging. Key pros include its shockproof design, IP68 water resistance, and a comprehensive health suite tracking SpO2, heart rate, and 100+ sports modes. However, notable cons include the lack of on-watch music storage, limited outdoor visibility due to display reflectivity, and lack of volume control during music playback.

Compare Fire Boltt Artillery with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Fire Boltt Artillery and other Smartwatches

No results found