OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Smartwatches Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 3,488 independent expert reviews and 5,192 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v2.0

Fire Boltt Phoenix Pro Review | 126 Data compared

Avg. price:~£25Screen size:1.39 inchBattery life:7 daysDisplay type:TFT LCD

Fire Boltt Phoenix Pro Review: Compare 126 technical specifications and 13 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

6.3

Overall score

Score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartwatch's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartwatches on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
Score components

70%

5.7

Technical score

30%

7.9

Review score ( 2 · 11)

Review score 30% · 7.9 · based on 13 independent reviews
Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 30%, technical score 70%. This model has enough reviews, so its review score is the weighted average of their grades.
â–¼Worse than 60% of smartwatches
5.7

Technical score

Technical score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
Score components

24%

5.5

Health

21%

8.5

Fitness

16%

5.1

Battery

14%

5.5

Smart features

12%

2.5

Connectivity

9%

4.4

Display & Design

4%

7.0

Hardware

â–¼Worse than 67% of smartwatches
7.9

Review score

Review score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 60% of models
Grades by review (13)
Text reviews 2
✓ explicit
1

15.4%

7.5

smartgearhq.com

≈ estimated
1

7.7%

8.0

deptstudios.com

Video reviews 9

7.7%

9.0

Born Creator

7.7%

9.0

Tech Wizard

7.7%

9.0

Anuj Kishanpur

7.7%

9.0

Techno Azeem

7.7%

8.0

ANUPAM Dev official

7.7%

8.0

Techno Fire

7.7%

7.0

TechTraveller Blend

7.7%

4.0

Jstech

3.8%

9.0

Sonu Mehta 2.0

estimated from the review
2 reviews: 1 with a printed score, 1 estimated from the review. 11 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
â–²Better than 60% of smartwatches
  • No image
No image

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Fire Boltt Phoenix Pro

Technical score
Technical score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
Score components:

24%

5.5

Health

21%

8.5

Fitness

16%

5.1

Battery

14%

5.5

Smart features

12%

2.5

Connectivity

9%

4.4

Display & Design

4%

7.0

Hardware

5.7
Review score
Review score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 60% of models
Grades by review (13)
Text reviews 2
✓ explicit
1

15.4%

7.5

smartgearhq.com

≈ estimated
1

7.7%

8.0

deptstudios.com

Video reviews 9

7.7%

9.0

Born Creator

7.7%

9.0

Tech Wizard

7.7%

9.0

Anuj Kishanpur

7.7%

9.0

Techno Azeem

7.7%

8.0

ANUPAM Dev official

7.7%

8.0

Techno Fire

7.7%

7.0

TechTraveller Blend

7.7%

4.0

Jstech

3.8%

9.0

Sonu Mehta 2.0

estimated from the review
2 reviews: 1 with a printed score, 1 estimated from the review. 11 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
7.9
Value for money
Value for money
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
Score components:

60%

6.3

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.4
Brand name
Fire
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
â–² Better than 11% of models
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 10.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
â–² Better than 33% of models
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 33.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
ECG
no
â–¼ Worse than 17% of models
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings. 48.2% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
Accelerometer
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.6% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
yes
Barometer
yes
â–² Better than 51% of models
This smartwatch includes a barometer. 50.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
Gyroscope
yes
â–² Better than 30% of models
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 30.2% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
no
Cadence sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 31.2% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
Distance tracking
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 4.1% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery life
7 days
Battery life
7 days
â–¼ Worse than 44% of models
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch offers a battery life of 7 days which is longer than that of 38.7% of smartwatches and equal to that of 17.1% of smartwatches.
7 (4 days with bluetooth calling.
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery power
255 mAh
Battery power
255 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a battery capacity of 255 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 69.4% of smartwatches and equal to those in 0.9% of smartwatches.
Charge time
180 min
Charge time
180 min
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges in 180 min which is slower than 96.1% of smartwatches and equal to the charge time of 2.1% of smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Proprietary OS
Operating system
Proprietary OS
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This smartwatch runs Proprietary OS which is less advanced than the operating system in 53.5% of smartwatches and the same as that in 42.8% of smartwatches.
Software update frequency
ended
Software update frequency
ended
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
This smartwatch has ended software update support which is less active than that of 42.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 57.5% of smartwatches.
Third-party app support
no
Third-party app support
no
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
This smartwatch does not support third-party apps. 47.7% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
Voice assistant support
yes
â–² Better than 32% of models
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 32.4% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
Cellular module
no
â–¼ Worse than 18% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 18% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
no
GPS
no
â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
This smartwatch does not support GPS. 56.2% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
â–¼ Worse than 39% of models
This smartwatch does not support Galileo navigation. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Compass
no
Compass
no
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This smartwatch does not include a compass. 52.7% of smartwatches include a compass.
Show more
Screen size
1.39 inch
Screen size
1.39 inch
â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
This smartwatch has a screen size of 1.39 inch which is smaller than the screens of 51.3% of smartwatches and equal to those of 9.5% of smartwatches.
Display type
TFT LCD
Display type
TFT LCD
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
This smartwatch uses a TFT LCD display type which is less advanced than that of 74.1% of smartwatches and the same as that of 15.9% of smartwatches.
Resolution
240x 240
Resolution
240x 240
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 240x240 which is lower than that of 73.9% of smartwatches and equal to that of 15.2% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
244 ppi
Pixel density
244 ppi
â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 244 ppi which is lower than that of 81% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.7% of smartwatches.
Display brightness
280 nits
Display brightness
280 nits
â–¼ Worse than 100% of models
Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
This smartwatch reaches 280 nits of display brightness, which is lower than that of 100% of smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
?
Processor model
?
RAM
?
Internal storage
0 GB
Internal storage
0 GB
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch uses 0 GB for internal storage which is smaller than that of 73.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 26.4% of smartwatches.
No local user storage for apps/media
External memory slot
no
External memory slot
no
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more
What reviewers say

Fire Boltt Phoenix Pro vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • Blood pressure monitoring
    Blood pressure monitoring
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This smartwatch supports blood pressure monitoring, the average smartwatch does not. 22% of smartwatches support blood pressure monitoring.
  • Barometer sensor included
    Barometer
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This smartwatch includes a barometer, the average smartwatch does not. 49.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • 40 more exercise profiles
    Multi-sport mode
    120
    â–² Better than 32% of models
    This smartwatch supports more exercise modes than the average smartwatch (120 vs 80). The average smartwatch supports 80 exercise modes.
    Reported as at least 120 exercise modes.
    120 vs 80
  • Better band material
    Band material
    silicone, metal
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    This smartwatch uses silicone, metal for the band material, while the average smartwatch uses silicone.
    silicone, metal vs silicone
  • 2 year/s newer release date
    Release date
    2023
    â–² Better than 70% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This smartwatch has a newer release date than the average smartwatch (2023 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    February 2023
    2023 vs 2021
  • 5.2x cheaper
    Fire Boltt Phoenix Pro is cheaper than the average smartwatch (£25 vs £130).
    £25 vs £130
  • 63.4% more popular
    Fire Boltt Phoenix Pro has a higher popularity than the average smartwatch (10 vs 6.1).
    10 vs 6.12
  • 5.2x cheaper
    Fire Boltt Phoenix Pro is cheaper than the average smartwatch (£25 vs £130).
    £25 vs £130
  • 63.4% more popular
    Fire Boltt Phoenix Pro has a higher popularity than the average smartwatch (10 vs 6.1).
    10 vs 6.12
  • Blood pressure monitoring
    Blood pressure monitoring
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This smartwatch supports blood pressure monitoring, the average smartwatch does not. 22% of smartwatches support blood pressure monitoring.
  • Barometer sensor included
    Barometer
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This smartwatch includes a barometer, the average smartwatch does not. 49.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • 40 more exercise profiles
    Multi-sport mode
    120
    â–² Better than 32% of models
    This smartwatch supports more exercise modes than the average smartwatch (120 vs 80). The average smartwatch supports 80 exercise modes.
    Reported as at least 120 exercise modes.
    120 vs 80
  • Better band material
    Band material
    silicone, metal
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    This smartwatch uses silicone, metal for the band material, while the average smartwatch uses silicone.
    silicone, metal vs silicone
  • 2 year/s newer release date
    Release date
    2023
    â–² Better than 70% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This smartwatch has a newer release date than the average smartwatch (2023 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    February 2023
    2023 vs 2021
  • No GPS support
    Route support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches support GPS.
  • 49 m lower water resistance depth
    Waterproof depth rating
    1 m
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <1 m – >50 m
    This smartwatch has a shallower waterproof rating than the average smartwatch (1 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch reaches 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1 m vs 50 m
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    TFT LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    This smartwatch uses TFT LCD display technology, while the average smartwatch features AMOLED.
    TFT LCD vs AMOLED
  • No coaching features
    Coaching
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 54.6% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • No auto-pause
    Auto pause
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This smartwatch does not support auto pause, the average smartwatch does. 59.3% of smartwatches support auto pause.
  • No always-on display
    Always-On Display
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not have an always-on display, the average smartwatch does. 67.6% of smartwatches have an always-on display.
  • No compass
    Compass
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a compass, the average smartwatch does. 52.6% of smartwatches include a compass.
  • Lower IP rating
    IP rating
    IP67
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartwatch has a lower IP rating than the average smartwatch (IP67 vs IP68).
    IP67 vs IP68
  • No smart scale support
    Smart scale compatibility
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support smart scale compatibility, the average smartwatch does. 53.7% of smartwatches support smart scale compatibility.
  • No coaching features
    Coaching
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 54.6% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • No auto-pause
    Auto pause
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This smartwatch does not support auto pause, the average smartwatch does. 59.3% of smartwatches support auto pause.
  • Basic battery type
    Battery type
    Li-ion
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartwatch uses a Li-ion battery, while the average smartwatch uses Li-Po.
    Li-ion vs Li-Po
  • 60 min longer charge time
    Charge time
    180 min
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
    Market range: <60 min – >150 min
    This smartwatch charges slower than the average smartwatch (180 min vs 120 min). The average smartwatch charges in 120 min.
    180 min vs 120 min
  • 45 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery life
    255 mAh days
    â–¼ Worse than 44% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartwatch (255 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    7 (4 days with bluetooth calling.
    255 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • No GPS support
    Route support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches support GPS.
  • No compass
    Compass
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a compass, the average smartwatch does. 52.6% of smartwatches include a compass.
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    TFT LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    This smartwatch uses TFT LCD display technology, while the average smartwatch features AMOLED.
    TFT LCD vs AMOLED
  • 49 m lower water resistance depth
    Waterproof depth rating
    1 m
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <1 m – >50 m
    This smartwatch has a shallower waterproof rating than the average smartwatch (1 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch reaches 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1 m vs 50 m
  • No always-on display
    Always-On Display
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not have an always-on display, the average smartwatch does. 67.6% of smartwatches have an always-on display.
  • Lower IP rating
    IP rating
    IP67
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartwatch has a lower IP rating than the average smartwatch (IP67 vs IP68).
    IP67 vs IP68
  • No ambient light sensor
    Ambient light sensor
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This smartwatch does not include an ambient light sensor, the average smartwatch does. 60.7% of smartwatches include an ambient light sensor.
  • 320 nits lower display brightness
    Display brightness
    280 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 100% of models
    Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
    This smartwatch has lower display brightness than the average smartwatch (280 nits vs 600 nits). The average smartwatch reaches 600 nits.
    280 nits vs 600 nits
  • 82 ppi lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    244 ppi
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
    Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
    This smartwatch has a lower pixel density than the average smartwatch (244 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch display reaches 326 ppi.
    244 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • Lower resolution
    Display type
    240 x 240
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 240x240, while the average smartwatch reaches 352x430.
    240x240 vs 352x430
  • 5 g heavier weight
    Weight
    50.0 g
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is heavier than the average smartwatch (50 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    50.0 g vs 45.0 g
  • No passcode
    Passcode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not include passcode protection, the average smartwatch does. 67.8% of smartwatches include passcode protection.
  • 4 GB less storage
    Internal storage
    0 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
    This smartwatch offers less internal storage than the average smartwatch (0 GB vs 4 GB). The average smartwatch provides 4 GB of storage.
    No local user storage for apps/media
    0 GB vs 4 GB

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
AR Smart Reviews
≈ estimated
30/10/2023
Hands-on review · features, calling and battery tests
Verdict
Fire Boltt Phoenix Pro is good value for a budget smartwatch, with decent calling and display but battery life and ringtone control are limited.
9.0
Tech Wizard
≈ estimated
27/07/2023
Full review · unboxing, display, calls and app tests
Verdict
Fire Boltt Phoenix Pro is a solid smartwatch for its price, with only the display refresh rate falling short.
8.0
ANUPAM Dev official
≈ estimated
27/02/2023
Unboxing and review · calling and battery tests
Verdict
Fire Boltt Phoenix Pro is best for calling at its price, though its sensors are not reliable for medical use.
8.0
Digit Hindi
≈ estimated
09/03/2023
Unboxing · first look at design and interface
Verdict
Fire Boltt Phoenix Pro looks premium and well finished, and the rubber strap stands out.
Not graded
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

What reviewers agree on

Based on 3 · 11

Reviewers like the smooth interface and reliable calling, but health tracking is widely criticised, while display and battery life divide opinion.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

7.5
smartgearhq.com
✓ explicit
06/07/2026
Two-week test · Everyday wear
Verdict
The Fire-Boltt Phoenix Pro suits first-time buyers, with a round face, indoor calls and 4 to 6 days of battery, but it has no built-in GPS.
8.0
deptstudios.com
≈ estimated
21/09/2026
Buyer comments · Short roundup
Verdict
The Fire-Boltt Phoenix Pro is a round metal-body watch with a bright 1.39-inch display and solid calling, but battery drops to about 4 days with calls on.

Third-party reviews

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Fire Boltt Phoenix Pro

  • Sleek and premium-looking metal body design
  • Clear and functional Bluetooth calling with built-in speaker and mic
  • Large, bright 1.39-inch round display with good indoor visibility
  • Extensive health and fitness tracking with over 120 sports modes
  • Excellent value for money given the wide range of features
  • Includes fun extras like built-in games and smart notifications

What we don't like about Fire Boltt Phoenix Pro

  • Battery drains quickly, especially with continuous health tracking or Bluetooth calling
  • Inconsistent sensor accuracy for heart rate and sleep monitoring
  • Poor customer service and difficult warranty claim process
  • Limited outdoor display visibility due to screen reflectivity
  • Basic software interface with occasional glitches and no third-party app support
  • The companion app can be difficult to navigate and slow to sync data

Verdict

The Fire-Boltt Phoenix Pro is a budget-friendly smartwatch featuring a 1.39-inch TFT round display with a 240x240 pixel resolution and 280 nits peak brightness, housed in a durable, anti-corrosive metal body. Key characteristics include integrated Bluetooth calling with a built-in speaker and mic, an AI voice assistant for hands-free tasks, and an IP67 water-resistance rating. For fitness, it offers over 120 sports modes alongside the Fire-Boltt Health Suite, which tracks heart rate, SpO2, and sleep quality. Main pros include its premium metallic design, extensive sports tracking, and a battery life of up to 7 days on a single charge. However, notable cons include the lack of local music storage, no manual volume control on the device itself, and a significantly reduced battery life of approximately 4 days when Bluetooth calling is active.

Compare Fire Boltt Phoenix Pro with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Fire Boltt Phoenix Pro and other Smartwatches

No results found