OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Smartwatches Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 3,488 independent expert reviews and 5,192 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v2.0

Fire Boltt Armour Review | 126 Data compared

Avg. price:~£25Screen size:1.60 inchBattery life:8 daysDisplay type:LCD

Fire Boltt Armour Review: Compare 126 technical specifications and expert reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

6.7

Overall score

Score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartwatch's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartwatches on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 53% of models
Score components

70%

6.5

Technical score

30%

?

Review score

Review score 30% · 7.0 · no independent reviews yet
Until reviews appear, its review part counts as 7/10. Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 30%, technical score 70%.
â–²Better than 53% of smartwatches
6.5

Technical score

Technical score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 58% of models
Score components

24%

5.9

Health

21%

8.4

Fitness

16%

6.5

Battery

14%

6.5

Smart features

12%

4.7

Connectivity

9%

6.1

Display & Design

4%

7.0

Hardware

â–²Better than 58% of smartwatches
?

Review score

Review score
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Grades by review (0)
We have not found an independent test of this model yet, so its review part counts as 7/10.
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
No expert tests yet
  • fire-boltt-armour
  • fire-boltt-armour
  • fire-boltt-armour
  • fire-boltt-armour
  • fire-boltt-armour
  • fire-boltt-armour
  • fire-boltt-armour
  • fire-boltt-armour
  • fire-boltt-armour
fire-boltt-armour
fire-boltt-armour
fire-boltt-armour
fire-boltt-armour
fire-boltt-armour
fire-boltt-armour
fire-boltt-armour
fire-boltt-armour
fire-boltt-armour

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Fire Boltt Armour

Technical score
Technical score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 58% of models
Score components:

24%

5.9

Health

21%

8.4

Fitness

16%

6.5

Battery

14%

6.5

Smart features

12%

4.7

Connectivity

9%

6.1

Display & Design

4%

7.0

Hardware

6.5
Review score
Review score
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Grades by review (0)
We have not found an independent test of this model yet, so its review part counts as 7/10.
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 58% of models
Score components:

60%

6.7

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.7
Brand name
Fire
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
â–² Better than 11% of models
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 10.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
â–² Better than 33% of models
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 33.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
Readings are for wellness use, not medical diagnosis.
ECG
no
ECG
no
â–¼ Worse than 17% of models
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
?
Show more
Accelerometer
yes
Accelerometer
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.6% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
no
Barometer
no
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
This smartwatch does not include a barometer. 49.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
?
Cadence sensor
no
Cadence sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 31.2% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
Distance tracking
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 4.1% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
Battery life
8 days
Battery life
8 days
â–² Better than 57% of models
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch offers a battery life of 8 days which is longer than that of 56.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 2.7% of smartwatches.
8 (5 days with bluetooth calling.
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life with GPS on
?
Battery power
425 mAh
Battery power
425 mAh
â–² Better than 82% of models
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a battery capacity of 425 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 82.1% of smartwatches and equal to those in 0.4% of smartwatches.
Charge time
120 min
Charge time
120 min
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges in 120 min which is faster than 13.1% of smartwatches and equal to the charge time of 44.2% of smartwatches.
Show more
Operating system
Proprietary OS
Operating system
Proprietary OS
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This smartwatch runs Proprietary OS which is less advanced than the operating system in 53.5% of smartwatches and the same as that in 42.8% of smartwatches.
Software update frequency
ended
Software update frequency
ended
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
This smartwatch has ended software update support which is less active than that of 42.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 57.5% of smartwatches.
Third-party app support
no
Third-party app support
no
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
This smartwatch does not support third-party apps. 47.7% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
Voice assistant support
yes
â–² Better than 32% of models
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 32.4% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
Cellular module
no
Cellular module
no
â–¼ Worse than 18% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 18% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
â–² Better than 44% of models
This smartwatch supports GPS. 43.9% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
â–¼ Worse than 39% of models
This smartwatch does not support Galileo navigation. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Compass
yes
Compass
yes
â–² Better than 47% of models
This smartwatch includes a compass. 47.5% of smartwatches include a compass.
Show more
Screen size
1.6 inch
Screen size
1.6 inch
â–² Better than 75% of models
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
This smartwatch has a screen size of 1.6 inch which is larger than the screens of 74.5% of smartwatches and equal to those of 1.7% of smartwatches.
Display type
LCD
Display type
LCD
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
This smartwatch uses a LCD display type which is less advanced than that of 90.1% of smartwatches and the same as that of 7.4% of smartwatches.
Resolution
400x 400
Resolution
400x 400
â–² Better than 69% of models
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 400x400 which is higher than that of 69.4% of smartwatches and equal to that of 2.8% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
354 ppi
Pixel density
354 ppi
â–² Better than 62% of models
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 354 ppi which is higher than that of 62.3% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.3% of smartwatches.
Display brightness
600 nits
Display brightness
600 nits
â–¼ Worse than 47% of models
Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
This smartwatch reaches 600 nits of display brightness, which is higher than that of 38.8% of smartwatches and equal to that of 14.1% of smartwatches.
Show more
CPU speed
?
Processor model
?
RAM
?
Internal storage
0 GB
Internal storage
0 GB
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch uses 0 GB for internal storage which is smaller than that of 73.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 26.4% of smartwatches.
No local user storage for apps/media.
External memory slot
no
External memory slot
no
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Fire Boltt Armour vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • Blood pressure monitoring
    Blood pressure monitoring
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This smartwatch supports blood pressure monitoring, the average smartwatch does not. 22% of smartwatches support blood pressure monitoring.
  • Emergency SOS
    Emergency SOS
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch includes Emergency SOS, the average smartwatch does not. 42.8% of smartwatches include Emergency SOS.
  • Rugged construction
    Rugged design
    yes
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This smartwatch has a rugged design, the average smartwatch does not. 37.9% of smartwatches have a rugged design.
  • Route support
    Route support
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch supports route support, the average smartwatch does not. 50% of smartwatches support route support.
  • 125 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery life
    425 mAh days
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch has a larger battery capacity than the average smartwatch (425 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    8 (5 days with bluetooth calling.
    425 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • 32 more exercise profiles
    Multi-sport mode
    112
    Category Benchmark
    This smartwatch supports more exercise modes than the average smartwatch (112 vs 80). The average smartwatch supports 80 exercise modes.
    Reported as at least 112 exercise modes.
    112 vs 80
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    This smartwatch tracks water intake, the average smartwatch does not. 44% of smartwatches track water intake.
  • 0.2 inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    1.60 inch
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
    This smartwatch has a larger screen size than the average smartwatch (1.6 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch screen is 1.40 inch.
    1.60 inch vs 1.40 inch
  • 5.2x cheaper
    Fire Boltt Armour is cheaper than the average smartwatch (£25 vs £130).
    £25 vs £130
  • Blood pressure monitoring
    Blood pressure monitoring
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This smartwatch supports blood pressure monitoring, the average smartwatch does not. 22% of smartwatches support blood pressure monitoring.
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    This smartwatch tracks water intake, the average smartwatch does not. 44% of smartwatches track water intake.
  • Route support
    Route support
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch supports route support, the average smartwatch does not. 50% of smartwatches support route support.
  • 32 more exercise profiles
    Multi-sport mode
    112
    Category Benchmark
    This smartwatch supports more exercise modes than the average smartwatch (112 vs 80). The average smartwatch supports 80 exercise modes.
    Reported as at least 112 exercise modes.
    112 vs 80
  • 125 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery life
    425 mAh days
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch has a larger battery capacity than the average smartwatch (425 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    8 (5 days with bluetooth calling.
    425 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • 1 days day/s longer battery life
    Battery life
    8 days
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 8 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    8 (5 days with bluetooth calling.
    8 days vs 7 days
  • Rugged construction
    Rugged design
    yes
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This smartwatch has a rugged design, the average smartwatch does not. 37.9% of smartwatches have a rugged design.
  • 0.2 inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    1.60 inch
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
    This smartwatch has a larger screen size than the average smartwatch (1.6 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch screen is 1.40 inch.
    1.60 inch vs 1.40 inch
  • Emergency SOS
    Emergency SOS
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch includes Emergency SOS, the average smartwatch does not. 42.8% of smartwatches include Emergency SOS.
  • 2 year/s newer release date
    Release date
    2023
    â–² Better than 70% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This smartwatch has a newer release date than the average smartwatch (2023 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    December 2023
    2023 vs 2021
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    This smartwatch uses LCD display technology, while the average smartwatch features AMOLED.
    LCD vs AMOLED
  • No stress monitoring
    Stress monitoring
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    This smartwatch does not support stress monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 65.4% of smartwatches support stress monitoring.
  • 48.5 m lower water resistance depth
    Waterproof depth rating
    1.5 m
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <1 m – >50 m
    This smartwatch has a shallower waterproof rating than the average smartwatch (1.5 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch reaches 50 m.
    0.2 ATM class (ISO 22,810 shallow-water rating, not diving certification).
    1.5 m vs 50 m
  • No auto-pause
    Auto pause
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This smartwatch does not support auto pause, the average smartwatch does. 59.3% of smartwatches support auto pause.
  • 35 g heavier weight
    Weight
    80.0 g
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is heavier than the average smartwatch (80 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    80.0 g vs 45.0 g
  • 50.4 mm thicker watch body
    Thickness
    62 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 100% of models
    Market range: <9.8 mm – >14.1 mm
    This smartwatch is thicker than the average smartwatch (62 mm vs 11.6 mm). The average smartwatch thickness is 11.6 mm.
    62 mm vs 11.6 mm
  • No smart scale support
    Smart scale compatibility
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support smart scale compatibility, the average smartwatch does. 53.7% of smartwatches support smart scale compatibility.
  • Basic battery type
    Battery type
    Li-ion
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartwatch uses a Li-ion battery, while the average smartwatch uses Li-Po.
    Li-ion vs Li-Po
  • No stress monitoring
    Stress monitoring
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    This smartwatch does not support stress monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 65.4% of smartwatches support stress monitoring.
  • No smart scale support
    Smart scale compatibility
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support smart scale compatibility, the average smartwatch does. 53.7% of smartwatches support smart scale compatibility.
  • No auto-pause
    Auto pause
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This smartwatch does not support auto pause, the average smartwatch does. 59.3% of smartwatches support auto pause.
  • Basic battery type
    Battery type
    Li-ion
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartwatch uses a Li-ion battery, while the average smartwatch uses Li-Po.
    Li-ion vs Li-Po
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    This smartwatch uses LCD display technology, while the average smartwatch features AMOLED.
    LCD vs AMOLED
  • 48.5 m lower water resistance depth
    Waterproof depth rating
    1.5 m
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <1 m – >50 m
    This smartwatch has a shallower waterproof rating than the average smartwatch (1.5 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch reaches 50 m.
    0.2 ATM class (ISO 22,810 shallow-water rating, not diving certification).
    1.5 m vs 50 m
  • 35 g heavier weight
    Weight
    80.0 g
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is heavier than the average smartwatch (80 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    80.0 g vs 45.0 g
  • 50.4 mm thicker watch body
    Thickness
    62 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 100% of models
    Market range: <9.8 mm – >14.1 mm
    This smartwatch is thicker than the average smartwatch (62 mm vs 11.6 mm). The average smartwatch thickness is 11.6 mm.
    62 mm vs 11.6 mm
  • 76 mm taller watch height
    Height
    121.0 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
    Market range: <39.5 mm – >51 mm
    This smartwatch is taller than the average smartwatch (121 mm vs 45 mm). The average smartwatch height is 45 mm.
    121.0 mm vs 45 mm
  • 28 mm wider watch width
    Width
    70.0 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 100% of models
    Market range: <34.6 mm – >46.8 mm
    This smartwatch is wider than the average smartwatch (70 mm vs 42 mm). The average smartwatch width is 42.0 mm.
    70.0 mm vs 42.0 mm
  • 4 GB less storage
    Internal storage
    0 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
    This smartwatch offers less internal storage than the average smartwatch (0 GB vs 4 GB). The average smartwatch provides 4 GB of storage.
    No local user storage for apps/media.
    0 GB vs 4 GB

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Third-party reviews

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Fire Boltt Armour

  • Rugged and sporty design with a durable metal body suitable for outdoors
  • Large, clear 1.6-inch display with 400x400 resolution and high pixel density (353 ppi)
  • Excellent battery life, typically lasting up to 8 days on a single charge
  • Comprehensive health suite including SpO2, heart rate, and sleep tracking
  • Affordable price point for the features offered
  • Includes helpful utility features like in-built games and a voice assistant

What we don't like about Fire Boltt Armour

  • Outdoor visibility can be limited due to screen reflectivity
  • Inconsistent sensor accuracy, particularly for blood pressure monitoring
  • Lacks integrated GPS, requiring a smartphone for accurate outdoor route tracking
  • Touch responsiveness can sometimes be laggy compared to high-end smartphones
  • Proprietary magnetic charger can be finicky to attach correctly
  • No support for third-party apps like Strava or Nike Run Club

Verdict

The Fire-Boltt Armour is a rugged outdoor smartwatch featuring a 1.6-inch high-resolution round display with a 400x400 pixel density (353 ppi) and a shockproof metal body. It is equipped with a large 600mAh battery that offers up to 8 days of typical usage and 25 days on standby, alongside essential features like Bluetooth calling, IP68 water resistance, and a comprehensive health suite including SpO2, heart rate, and sleep monitoring. Main pros include its durable construction, long-lasting battery life, and clear display, while notable cons include the lack of built-in GPS and a relatively bulky design that may not suit all wrist sizes.

Compare Fire Boltt Armour with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Fire Boltt Armour and other Smartwatches

No results found