OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Smartwatches Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 3,488 independent expert reviews and 5,192 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v2.0

Rogbid Model R Review | 126 Data compared

Avg. price:~£70Screen size:1.85 inchBattery life:2 daysDisplay type:IPS LCD

Rogbid Model R Review: Compare 126 technical specifications and 3 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

7.1

Overall score

Score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartwatch's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartwatches on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 66% of models
Score components

70%

7.1

Technical score

30%

7.2

Review score ( 0 · 3)

Review score 30% · 7.2 · based on 3 videos
3 videos count as 1.3 of the 5 needed; the rest counts as 7/10. Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 30%, technical score 70%. A video or a short review counts less than a full test.
â–²Better than 66% of smartwatches
7.1

Technical score

Technical score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 68% of models
Score components

24%

6.7

Health

21%

8.2

Fitness

16%

5.7

Battery

14%

6.3

Smart features

12%

8.9

Connectivity

9%

5.7

Display & Design

4%

8.9

Hardware

â–²Better than 68% of smartwatches
7.2

Review score

Review score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
Grades by review (3)
3 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Video reviews 1

5%

9.0

Seen Through a Lens

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 74% of smartwatches
  • rogbid-model-r
  • rogbid-model-r
  • rogbid-model-r
  • rogbid-model-r
  • rogbid-model-r
  • rogbid-model-r
  • rogbid-model-r
  • rogbid-model-r
  • rogbid-model-r
rogbid-model-r
rogbid-model-r
rogbid-model-r
rogbid-model-r
rogbid-model-r
rogbid-model-r
rogbid-model-r
rogbid-model-r
rogbid-model-r

Best prices

    N/A~ £70

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Rogbid Model R

Technical score
Technical score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 68% of models
Score components:

24%

6.7

Health

21%

8.2

Fitness

16%

5.7

Battery

14%

6.3

Smart features

12%

8.9

Connectivity

9%

5.7

Display & Design

4%

8.9

Hardware

7.1
Review score
Review score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
Grades by review (3)
3 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Video reviews 1

5%

9.0

Seen Through a Lens

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
7.2
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartwatch.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Rogbid Model R has a popularity of 1 point, which is lower than 70.7% of smartwatches.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 70% of models
Score components:

60%

7.1

Overall score

40%

10

Price

8.0
Brand name
Rogbid
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
â–² Better than 11% of models
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 10.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
no
Blood oxygen monitoring
no
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
This smartwatch does not support blood oxygen monitoring. 66.8% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
ECG
no
â–¼ Worse than 17% of models
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
â–² Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings. 51.9% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
Show more
Accelerometer
yes
Accelerometer
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.6% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
no
Barometer
no
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
This smartwatch does not include a barometer. 49.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
no
Gyroscope
no
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
This smartwatch does not include a gyroscope. 70% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
yes
Cadence sensor
yes
â–² Better than 69% of models
This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor. 69% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Cadence may require external sensor/app pairing on some models.
Distance tracking
yes
Distance tracking
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 4.1% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
Battery life
2 days
Battery life
2 days
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch offers a battery life of 2 days which is shorter than that of 79.8% of smartwatches and equal to that of 4.6% of smartwatches.
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life with GPS on
20 h
Battery life with GPS on
20 h
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
This smartwatch lasts 20 h with GPS on which is longer than 46.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 5.6% of smartwatches.
Battery power
470 mAh
Battery power
470 mAh
â–² Better than 88% of models
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a battery capacity of 470 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 88.5% of smartwatches and equal to those in 0.6% of smartwatches.
Charge time
120 min
Charge time
120 min
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges in 120 min which is faster than 13.1% of smartwatches and equal to the charge time of 44.2% of smartwatches.
Show more
Operating system
Android
Operating system
Android
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
This smartwatch runs Android which is less advanced than the operating system in 96.4% of smartwatches and the same as that in 1.3% of smartwatches.
Software update frequency
?
Third-party app support
yes
Third-party app support
yes
â–² Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports third-party apps. 52.4% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
no
Voice assistant support
no
â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
This smartwatch does not support voice assistants. 67.8% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
yes
Cellular module
yes
â–² Better than 82% of models
This smartwatch includes a cellular module. 82.2% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
â–² Better than 44% of models
This smartwatch supports GPS. 43.9% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
yes
Galileo support
yes
â–² Better than 62% of models
This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation. 61.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Compass
?
Show more
Screen size
1.85 inch
Screen size
1.85 inch
★ Better than 91% of models
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
This smartwatch has a screen size of 1.85 inch which is larger than the screens of 91.2% of smartwatches and equal to those of 2.3% of smartwatches.
Display type
IPS LCD
Display type
IPS LCD
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
This smartwatch uses a IPS LCD display type which is less advanced than that of 67.4% of smartwatches and the same as that of 6.6% of smartwatches.
Resolution
400x 400
Resolution
400x 400
â–² Better than 69% of models
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 400x400 which is higher than that of 69.4% of smartwatches and equal to that of 2.8% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
306 ppi
Pixel density
306 ppi
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 306 ppi which is lower than that of 62.2% of smartwatches.
Display brightness
800 nits
Display brightness
800 nits
â–² Better than 56% of models
Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
This smartwatch reaches 800 nits of display brightness, which is higher than that of 55.9% of smartwatches and equal to that of 2.9% of smartwatches.
Show more
CPU speed
?
Processor model
?
RAM
?
Internal storage
32 GB
Internal storage
32 GB
â–² Better than 85% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch uses 32 GB for internal storage which is larger than that of 84.7% of smartwatches and equal to that of 13.4% of smartwatches.
External memory slot
no
External memory slot
no
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Rogbid Model R vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • Blood pressure monitoring
    Blood pressure monitoring
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This smartwatch supports blood pressure monitoring, the average smartwatch does not. 22% of smartwatches support blood pressure monitoring.
  • Temperature sensing
    Temperature sensor
    yes
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This smartwatch includes a temperature sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 26.8% of smartwatches include a temperature sensor.
  • Built-in cellular module
    Cellular module
    yes
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    This smartwatch includes a cellular module, the average smartwatch does not. 17.9% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
  • VO2 max measurement
    VO2 max measurement
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch measures VO2 max, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • NFC functionality
    NFC
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 43.4% of smartwatches support NFC.
    NFC hardware is present, but functionality may be limited by region/app support.
  • Third-party app support
    Third-party app support
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports third-party apps, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • Irregular heart rate alerts
    Irregular heart rate warnings
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does not. 48.1% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • Cadence tracking
    Cadence sensor
    yes
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 31.1% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
    Cadence may require external sensor/app pairing on some models.
  • Blood pressure monitoring
    Blood pressure monitoring
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This smartwatch supports blood pressure monitoring, the average smartwatch does not. 22% of smartwatches support blood pressure monitoring.
  • Temperature sensing
    Temperature sensor
    yes
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This smartwatch includes a temperature sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 26.8% of smartwatches include a temperature sensor.
  • VO2 max measurement
    VO2 max measurement
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch measures VO2 max, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • Irregular heart rate alerts
    Irregular heart rate warnings
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does not. 48.1% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • Calorie tracking
    Calorie tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.6% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
  • Cadence tracking
    Cadence sensor
    yes
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 31.1% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
    Cadence may require external sensor/app pairing on some models.
  • Route support
    Route support
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch supports route support, the average smartwatch does not. 50% of smartwatches support route support.
    Route support available via companion app.
  • 43 more exercise profiles
    Multi-sport mode
    123
    â–² Better than 32% of models
    This smartwatch supports more exercise modes than the average smartwatch (123 vs 80). The average smartwatch supports 80 exercise modes.
    Reported as at least 123 exercise modes.
    123 vs 80
  • 170 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery life in training mode
    470 mAh
    Category Benchmark
    Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
    This smartwatch has a larger battery capacity than the average smartwatch (470 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    470 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • Built-in cellular module
    Cellular module
    yes
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    This smartwatch includes a cellular module, the average smartwatch does not. 17.9% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
  • NFC functionality
    NFC
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 43.4% of smartwatches support NFC.
    NFC hardware is present, but functionality may be limited by region/app support.
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    Wi-Fi support
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.3% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • Galileo satellite support
    Galileo support
    yes
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation, the average smartwatch does not. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
  • 0.45 inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    1.85 inch
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
    This smartwatch has a larger screen size than the average smartwatch (1.9 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch screen is 1.40 inch.
    1.85 inch vs 1.40 inch
  • Rugged construction
    Rugged design
    yes
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This smartwatch has a rugged design, the average smartwatch does not. 37.9% of smartwatches have a rugged design.
    Rugged design supported by MIL-STD/military-grade durability claim.
  • Better case material
    Case material
    ceramic
    â–² Better than 87% of models
    This smartwatch uses ceramic for the case material, while the average smartwatch uses polycarbonate.
    ceramic vs polycarbonate
  • 200 nits higher display brightness
    Display brightness
    800 nits
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
    This smartwatch has higher display brightness than the average smartwatch (800 nits vs 600 nits). The average smartwatch reaches 600 nits.
    800 nits vs 600 nits
  • Third-party app support
    Third-party app support
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports third-party apps, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • 28 GB more storage
    Internal storage
    32 GB
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
    This smartwatch offers more internal storage than the average smartwatch (32 GB vs 4 GB). The average smartwatch provides 4 GB of storage.
    32 GB vs 4 GB
  • Built-in camera
    Camera megapixels
    yes MP
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This smartwatch supports camera, the average smartwatch does not. 2% of smartwatches support camera.
    Rear camera.
  • 3 year/s newer release date
    Release date
    2024
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This smartwatch has a newer release date than the average smartwatch (2024 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    August 2024
    2024 vs 2021
  • No blood oxygen monitoring
    Blood oxygen monitoring
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartwatch does not support blood oxygen monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 66.7% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
  • 49 m lower water resistance depth
    Waterproof depth rating
    1 m
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <1 m – >50 m
    This smartwatch has a shallower waterproof rating than the average smartwatch (1 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch reaches 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1 m vs 50 m
  • No coaching features
    Multi-sport mode
    no
    â–² Better than 32% of models
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 54.6% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • No auto-pause
    Auto pause
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This smartwatch does not support auto pause, the average smartwatch does. 59.3% of smartwatches support auto pause.
  • No gyroscope
    Gyroscope
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a gyroscope, the average smartwatch does. 69.9% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
  • No always-on display
    Always-On Display
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not have an always-on display, the average smartwatch does. 67.6% of smartwatches have an always-on display.
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    IPS LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartwatch uses IPS LCD display technology, while the average smartwatch features AMOLED.
    IPS LCD vs AMOLED
  • No voice assistant
    Voice assistant support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not support voice assistants, the average smartwatch does. 67.7% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
  • 6.12x less popular
    Rogbid Model R has a lower popularity than the average smartwatch (1 vs 6.1).
    1 vs 6.12
  • No blood oxygen monitoring
    Blood oxygen monitoring
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartwatch does not support blood oxygen monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 66.7% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
  • No coaching features
    Multi-sport mode
    no
    â–² Better than 32% of models
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 54.6% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • No auto-pause
    Auto pause
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This smartwatch does not support auto pause, the average smartwatch does. 59.3% of smartwatches support auto pause.
  • No gyroscope
    Gyroscope
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a gyroscope, the average smartwatch does. 69.9% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
  • 5 days day/s shorter battery life
    Battery life in training mode
    2 days h
    Category Benchmark
    Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
    This smartwatch offers 2 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    2 days vs 7 days
  • Older Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    4.2
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    This smartwatch supports an older Bluetooth version than the average smartwatch (4.2 vs 5). The average smartwatch uses 5.0.
    4.2 vs 5.0
  • 49 m lower water resistance depth
    Waterproof depth rating
    1 m
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <1 m – >50 m
    This smartwatch has a shallower waterproof rating than the average smartwatch (1 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch reaches 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1 m vs 50 m
  • No always-on display
    Always-On Display
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not have an always-on display, the average smartwatch does. 67.6% of smartwatches have an always-on display.
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    IPS LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartwatch uses IPS LCD display technology, while the average smartwatch features AMOLED.
    IPS LCD vs AMOLED
  • 47.5 g heavier weight
    Weight
    92.5 g
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is heavier than the average smartwatch (92.5 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    92.5 g vs 45.0 g
  • 3.4 mm thicker watch body
    Thickness
    15 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
    Market range: <9.8 mm – >14.1 mm
    This smartwatch is thicker than the average smartwatch (15 mm vs 11.6 mm). The average smartwatch thickness is 11.6 mm.
    15 mm vs 11.6 mm
  • 7 mm taller watch height
    Height
    52.0 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <39.5 mm – >51 mm
    This smartwatch is taller than the average smartwatch (52 mm vs 45 mm). The average smartwatch height is 45 mm.
    52.0 mm vs 45 mm
  • 10 mm wider watch width
    Width
    52.0 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
    Market range: <34.6 mm – >46.8 mm
    This smartwatch is wider than the average smartwatch (52 mm vs 42 mm). The average smartwatch width is 42.0 mm.
    52.0 mm vs 42.0 mm
  • 20 ppi lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    306 ppi
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
    This smartwatch has a lower pixel density than the average smartwatch (306 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch display reaches 326 ppi.
    306 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • 4 mm wider band
    Width of band
    26.0 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
    Market range: <20 mm – >22 mm
    This smartwatch has a wider band width than the average smartwatch (26 mm vs 22 mm). The average smartwatch band is 22.0 mm wide.
    26.0 mm vs 22.0 mm
  • No voice assistant
    Voice assistant support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not support voice assistants, the average smartwatch does. 67.7% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
  • No smart alarm
    Smart alarm
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 52.7% of smartwatches support smart alarms.
  • Less advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Android
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
    This smartwatch runs a less advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Android vs Proprietary OS).
    Android vs Proprietary OS
  • 3 MP lower main megapixels
    Camera megapixels
    2 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    Market range: <1 MP – >8 MP
    This smartwatch has a lower main camera resolution than the average smartwatch (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average smartwatch camera reaches 5 MP.
    2 MP vs 5 MP

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Seen Through a Lens
≈ estimated
27/09/2024
Unboxing and first look · calls, GPS and camera
Verdict
Rogbid Model R could be your next smartwatch if you want style, 4G connectivity and health tracking on a budget.
Not graded

What reviewers agree on

Based on 0 · 3

The few reviewers mostly like its app support, though there is too little feedback to judge much else.
Praised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Third-party reviews

What we like about Rogbid Model R

  • Independent 4G connectivity with built-in nano SIM slot for calls and data
  • Large, high-resolution 1.85-inch HD display with vibrant 98% RGB color gamut
  • Significant battery capacity (1,100mAh) compared to competitors, supporting extended use
  • Integrated 2MP camera for photos, video recording, and QR code scanning
  • Fully functional Android 8.1 OS with access to the [Google Play Store](https://play.google.com)
  • Comprehensive health tracking including heart rate, SpO2, and blood pressure monitoring
  • Premium metallic chassis and sturdy build quality

What we don't like about Rogbid Model R

  • Software limitations due to older Android versions (Android 8.1), potentially restricting newer app downloads
  • Potential for inaccurate health metrics, specifically heart rate and oxygen saturation compared to medical devices
  • Clunky user interface and navigation, such as difficulty finding specific settings like unit changes
  • Substantial physical weight and bulkiness, which may be unexpected for some users
  • Occasional syncing issues with certain watch faces and the companion app
  • Limited water resistance rating (IP67), not suitable for long-term soaking or saunas

Verdict

The Rogbid Model R is a versatile 4G Android smartwatch featuring a 1.85-inch circular HD display with 400x400 resolution and a built-in 2MP camera for photos and QR scanning. Powered by a quad-core processor with 3GB of RAM and 32GB of storage, it runs Android 8.1, allowing for direct app downloads from the Google Play Store. Key pros include its independent cellular connectivity via a nano-SIM slot, integrated GPS, NFC for payments, and a high-capacity 1,100mAh battery for extended use. However, some users may find its Android 8.1 OS slightly dated, and the 2-day active battery life is relatively short compared to basic non-cellular fitness trackers.

Compare Rogbid Model R with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Rogbid Model R and other Smartwatches

No results found