OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartwatches Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v3.0

Polar Grit X2 Pro review: 127 specs compared

Avg. price:~£?Screen size:1.39 inchBattery life:10 daysDisplay type:AMOLED

Polar Grit X2 Pro Review: Compare 127 technical specifications, 24 expert and video reviews and 6 best-of lists to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

Polar Grit X2 Pro
8.1/10

Overall score

Score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 85% of models
Score components

35%

7.9

Technical score

30%

8.3

List score

25%

7.7

Reviews score

10%

8.4

Sentiment score

▲Better than 85% of smartwatches
?

Value for money

Value for money
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.1

Overall score

30%

?

Price

Price not known yet
7.9

Technical score

Technical score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 82% of models
Score components

24%

8.1

Health

21%

10

Fitness

16%

7.6

Battery

14%

6.2

Smart features

12%

7.4

Connectivity

9%

7.7

Display & Design

4%

6.2

Hardware

▲Better than 82%
7.7

Reviews score

Reviews score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.5 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 53% of models

80%

7.6

Average grade

20%

8.4

Popularity

Grades by review (24)
5 reviews + 19 videos, average 7.5/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
▼Worse than 53%
8.3

List score

List score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (6)
List score: in 6 of 120 lists (5%)
★Better than 91%
  • polar-grit-x2-pro
  • polar-grit-x2-pro
  • polar-grit-x2-pro
  • polar-grit-x2-pro
  • polar-grit-x2-pro
  • polar-grit-x2-pro
polar-grit-x2-pro
polar-grit-x2-pro
polar-grit-x2-pro
polar-grit-x2-pro
polar-grit-x2-pro
polar-grit-x2-pro
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Polar Grit X2 Pro

Technical score
Technical score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 82% of models
Score components:

24%

8.1

Health

21%

10

Fitness

16%

7.6

Battery

14%

6.2

Smart features

12%

7.4

Connectivity

9%

7.7

Display & Design

4%

6.2

Hardware

7.9
Reviews score
7.7
List score
8.3
Value for money
Value for money
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 89% of models
Score components:

70%

8.1

Overall score

30%

?

Price

8.6
Heart rate monitor
yes
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 9.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 30.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
yes
This smartwatch supports ECG. 82.1% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings. 50.6% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
HRV tracking
yes
This smartwatch supports HRV tracking. 54.9% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.5% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
yes
This smartwatch includes a barometer. 46.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 28.9% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
yes
This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor. 67.2% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 3.7% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
Battery life
10 days
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch lasts 10 days on a charge, which is longer than 59.2% of Smartwatches and the same as 6.6% of Smartwatches.
Battery life in training mode
40 h
Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
This smartwatch records workouts for 40 h on a charge, which is longer than 83.7% of Smartwatches and the same as 2.2% of Smartwatches.
Battery life with GPS on
40 h
Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
This smartwatch lasts 40 h with GPS on, which is longer than 83% of Smartwatches and the same as 3.4% of Smartwatches.
Battery power
488 mAh
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a 488 mAh battery, which is larger than 88.3% of Smartwatches.
Charge time
120 min
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges from empty in 120 min, which is quicker than 13.3% of Smartwatches and the same as 44.6% of Smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Proprietary OS
This smartwatch runs Proprietary OS, which is less advanced than the system in 54% of Smartwatches and equal to 42.1% of Smartwatches.
Software update frequency
occasional
This smartwatch has occasional software update support which is more active than that of 54% of smartwatches and equal to that of 40.2% of smartwatches.
Third-party app support
yes
This smartwatch supports third-party apps. 48.5% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 16.6% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
yes
This smartwatch supports GPS. 40.3% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
yes
This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation. 56.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Dual-frequency GPS
yes
Polar Grit X2 Pro supports dual-frequency GPS. 85% of Smartwatches offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen size
1.39 inch
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
This smartwatch has a 1.39 inch screen, which is smaller than 51.3% of Smartwatches and the same as 9% of Smartwatches.
Display type
AMOLED
This smartwatch uses AMOLED, which is more advanced than the screen in 46.9% of Smartwatches and equal to 53.1% of Smartwatches.
Resolution
454x 454
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 454x454 which is higher than that of 76.5% of smartwatches and equal to that of 7% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
326 ppi
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 326 ppi, which is higher than 45% of Smartwatches and equal to 8.7% of Smartwatches.
Display brightness
1,050 nits
Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
This smartwatch has a screen brightness of 1,050 nits, which is higher than 80.8% of Smartwatches and equal to 0.3% of Smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
0.275 GHz
This smartwatch uses a CPU configuration of 0.275 GHz which is slower than that in 74.5% of smartwatches and equal to that in 0.8% of smartwatches.
Processor model
?
RAM
?
Internal storage
32 GB
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch has 32 GB of internal storage, which is more than 81.3% of Smartwatches and equal to 15% of Smartwatches.
External memory slot
no
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Polar Grit X2 Pro vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • ECG support
    This smartwatch supports ECG, the average smartwatch does not. 18% of smartwatches support ECG.
  • Temperature sensing
    This smartwatch includes a temperature sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 31.9% of smartwatches include a temperature sensor.
  • Readiness score
    This smartwatch supports readiness scores, the average smartwatch does not. 19.8% of smartwatches support readiness scores.
  • 19 h longer GPS battery life
    This smartwatch lasts longer with GPS on than the average smartwatch (40 h vs 21 h). The average smartwatch lasts 21 h with GPS on.
    40 h vs 21 h
  • HRV tracking
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 45.2% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • Stronger display glass
    This smartwatch uses sapphire display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    sapphire vs mineral glass
  • 20 h longer training battery life
    This smartwatch lasts longer in training mode than the average smartwatch (40 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h in training mode.
    40 h vs 20 h
  • Maps support
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 34.4% of smartwatches support maps.
  • 10.0% higher review score
    Reviews score
    7.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.5 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models

    80%

    7.6

    Average grade

    20%

    8.4

    Popularity

    Grades by review (24)
    5 reviews + 19 videos, average 7.5/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    7.7 vs 7.0
  • 5.1% higher list score
    List score
    8.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
    How we count it
    Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
    Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
    Lists with this model (6)
    List score: in 6 of 120 lists (5%)
    8.3 vs 7.9
  • 11.2% better value for money
    Polar Grit X2 Pro has a higher value-for-money score than the average smartwatch (8.63 vs 7.8).
    8.63 vs 7.76
  • ECG support
    This smartwatch supports ECG, the average smartwatch does not. 18% of smartwatches support ECG.
  • Temperature sensing
    This smartwatch includes a temperature sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 31.9% of smartwatches include a temperature sensor.
  • Readiness score
    This smartwatch supports readiness scores, the average smartwatch does not. 19.8% of smartwatches support readiness scores.
  • HRV tracking
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 45.2% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • 3 years newer
    This smartwatch was released more recently than the average smartwatch (2024 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    2,024 vs 2,021
  • Weight tracking
    This smartwatch supports weight tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 41.9% of smartwatches support weight tracking.
  • External heart rate monitor support
    This smartwatch supports external heart rate monitor compatibility, the average smartwatch does not. 46.6% of smartwatches support external heart rate monitor compatibility.
  • Cadence tracking
    This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 32.9% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
  • 19 h longer GPS battery life
    This smartwatch lasts longer with GPS on than the average smartwatch (40 h vs 21 h). The average smartwatch lasts 21 h with GPS on.
    40 h vs 21 h
  • 20 h longer training battery life
    This smartwatch lasts longer in training mode than the average smartwatch (40 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h in training mode.
    40 h vs 20 h
  • 183 mAh larger battery capacity
    This smartwatch has a larger battery than the average smartwatch (488 mAh vs 305 mAh). The average smartwatch has a 305 mAh battery.
    488 mAh vs 305 mAh
  • 3 days longer battery life
    This smartwatch runs longer per charge than the average smartwatch (10 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    10 days vs 7 days
  • Maps support
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 34.4% of smartwatches support maps.
  • Supports dual-frequency GPS
    Polar Grit X2 Pro supports dual-frequency GPS, while the average smartwatch does not. 15.1% of Smartwatches support dual-frequency GPS.
  • Galileo satellite support
    This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation, the average smartwatch does not. 43.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
  • More current Bluetooth version
    This smartwatch uses a more current Bluetooth version than the average smartwatch (5.1 vs 5).
    5.1 vs 5.0
  • Stronger display glass
    This smartwatch uses sapphire display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    sapphire vs mineral glass
  • Rugged construction
    This smartwatch has a rugged design, the average smartwatch does not. 41.3% of smartwatches have a rugged design.
  • 50 m deeper water rating
    This smartwatch is rated for deeper water than the average smartwatch (100 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch is rated to 50 m.
    100 m vs 50 m
  • 300 nits brighter screen
    This smartwatch has a brighter screen than the average smartwatch (1050 nits vs 750 nits). The average smartwatch peaks at 750 nits.
    1,050 nits vs 750 nits
  • Better case material
    This smartwatch uses stainless steel for the case material, while the average smartwatch uses polycarbonate.
    stainless steel vs polycarbonate
  • Higher resolution
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 454x454, while the average smartwatch reaches 360x360.
    454x454 vs 360x360
  • More frequent updates
    This smartwatch receives occasional software updates, while the average smartwatch receives ended updates.
    occasional vs ended
  • 8x more internal storage
    This smartwatch has more internal storage than the average smartwatch (32 GB vs 4 GB). The average smartwatch has 4 GB of internal storage.
    32 GB vs 4 GB
  • No irregular heart rate alerts
    This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does. 50.6% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • Weaker ingress protection
    This smartwatch has weaker ingress protection than the average smartwatch (IPX8 vs IP68).
    IPX8 vs IP68
  • No voice command support
    This smartwatch does not support voice commands, the average smartwatch does. 68.1% of smartwatches support voice commands.
  • 1 fewer microphones
    This smartwatch has fewer microphones than the average smartwatch (0 vs 1). The average smartwatch has 1 microphones.
    0 vs 1
  • 12 g heavier
    This smartwatch is heavier than the average smartwatch (57 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    57 g vs 45.0 g
  • No smart alarm
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 50.6% of smartwatches support smart alarms.
  • 1 mm thicker
    This smartwatch is thicker than the average smartwatch (12.7 mm vs 11.7 mm). The average smartwatch is 11.7 mm thick.
    12.7 mm vs 11.7 mm
  • 5.8 mm wider case
    This smartwatch has a wider case than the average smartwatch (48.3 mm vs 42.5 mm). The average smartwatch measures 42.5 mm across.
    48.3 mm vs 42.5 mm
  • No irregular heart rate alerts
    This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does. 50.6% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • Weaker ingress protection
    This smartwatch has weaker ingress protection than the average smartwatch (IPX8 vs IP68).
    IPX8 vs IP68
  • 12 g heavier
    This smartwatch is heavier than the average smartwatch (57 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    57 g vs 45.0 g
  • 1 mm thicker
    This smartwatch is thicker than the average smartwatch (12.7 mm vs 11.7 mm). The average smartwatch is 11.7 mm thick.
    12.7 mm vs 11.7 mm
  • 5.8 mm wider case
    This smartwatch has a wider case than the average smartwatch (48.3 mm vs 42.5 mm). The average smartwatch measures 42.5 mm across.
    48.3 mm vs 42.5 mm
  • 3.3 mm taller case
    This smartwatch has a taller case than the average smartwatch (48.3 mm vs 45 mm). The average smartwatch is 45.0 mm tall.
    48.3 mm vs 45.0 mm
  • 0.01 inch smaller display
    This smartwatch has a smaller screen than the average smartwatch (1.4 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch has a 1.4 inch screen.
    1.39 inch vs 1.4 inch
  • No voice command support
    This smartwatch does not support voice commands, the average smartwatch does. 68.1% of smartwatches support voice commands.
  • No smart alarm
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 50.6% of smartwatches support smart alarms.
  • No camera remote
    This smartwatch does not include built-in camera remote control, the average smartwatch does. 85.5% of smartwatches that are equipped with a camera include built-in camera remote control.
  • 1 fewer microphones
    This smartwatch has fewer microphones than the average smartwatch (0 vs 1). The average smartwatch has 1 microphones.
    0 vs 1

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

6.0
Seppo Moilanen
≈ estimated
26/10/2024
Hands-on review · price, heart rate and features
Verdict
Polar Grit X2 Pro has accurate heart rate tracking, but the high price and few upgrades over the old Grit make it a hard sell.
5.0
The Wearableist
≈ estimated
08/08/2024
Long-term review · two months of outdoor and gym use
Verdict
Polar Grit X2 Pro is only for die-hard Polar fans, with many issues and better alternatives for most buyers.
8.0
Terradrift
≈ estimated
11/07/2024
Long-term test · over a month of daily use
Verdict
Polar Grit X2 Pro is a solid GPS and training watch for serious athletes, though smart features are limited and it has connection issues.
6.0
Connect The Watts
≈ estimated
30/05/2024
Hands-on review · accuracy tests and price check
Verdict
Polar Grit X2 Pro is accurate and strong for HRV tracking, but the price is hard to justify given its feature set.
7.0
The Run Testers
≈ estimated
20/05/2024
Hands-on review · running, GPS, heart rate and battery tests
Verdict
Polar Grit X2 Pro is a solid all-rounder that impressed, but its high price makes it hard to recommend over cheaper alternatives.
6.0
DC Rainmaker
≈ estimated
14/05/2024
Full review · hiking, workouts, GPS and heart rate tests
Verdict
Polar Grit X2 Pro is accurate and Polar's best watch yet, but overpriced for what it offers right now.
8.0
Chase the Summit
≈ estimated
09/05/2024
Long-term test · over a month of use, GPS and heart rate checks
Verdict
Polar Grit X2 Pro is expensive, but it is the best premium Polar watch, though heart rate accuracy is not perfect yet.
5.0
German Accent Reviews
≈ estimated
07/05/2024
Hands-on review · training, battery and heart rate tests
Verdict
Polar Grit X2 Pro is a very good watch overall, but better options exist at its price, so it is hard to recommend.
8.0
DesFit
≈ estimated
19/04/2024
In-depth review · heart rate, GPS and sport tests
Verdict
Polar Grit X2 Pro puts Polar back in the game for outdoor sports watches, with price as the main hurdle.
7.0
Chase the Summit
≈ estimated
20/03/2024
Hands-on review · design, battery and price comparison
Verdict
Polar Grit X2 Pro has a beautiful design and great battery, but its price is hard to justify against stronger rivals.
5.0
DC Rainmaker
≈ estimated
20/03/2024
Hands-on first look · heart rate checks and new features
Verdict
Polar Grit X2 Pro's price is hard to justify against rivals, and the full verdict will come in the in-depth review.
Overview video

What reviewers agree on

Based on 5 · 12

Reviewers praise the accurate GPS, strong battery and tough build, but find it expensive and short on smartwatch features.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

7.5
220triathlon.com
✓ explicit
19/01/2026
Hands-on test · Triathlon watch
Verdict
The Polar Grit X2 Pro is a well-built triathlon watch, strongest for bike and run GPS, though weaker in open water and missing TrainingPeaks.
8.0
livefortheoutdoors.com
✓ explicit
04/09/2025
Field test · Rugged outdoor watch
Verdict
The Polar Grit X2 Pro is best for hikers and multi-day trekkers, with a bright screen and strong maps, though it is heavy for fast running.
9.0
epoptrail.fr
≈ estimated
03/08/2026
Field test · Ultra-trail GPS watch
Verdict
The Polar Grit X2 Pro suits ultra-runners and multi-day trekkers who need its 140-hour eco GPS mode, though it lacks contactless payments.
9.6
horloge-du-coureur.fr
✓ explicit
12/11/2025
Hands-on test · Outdoor sports watch
Verdict
The Polar Grit X2 Pro is a light, precise outdoor watch suiting athletes who value training data over smartwatch features.

Third-party reviews

What we like about Polar Grit X2 Pro

  • Dual-band GPS records clean tracks in dense forest and canyons.
  • Offline topo maps let you navigate without a phone.
  • Sapphire glass and 100 m water resistance suit rough use.
  • The screen at 1050 nits stays readable in strong sun.
  • 40 h of GPS battery covers multi-day trips.
  • Komoot routes sync to the watch for turn-by-turn guidance.

What we don't like about Polar Grit X2 Pro

  • The 48.3 mm case is large on small wrists.
  • There is no contactless payment.
  • The charging cable is proprietary, with no wireless or solar option.
  • Calibration prompts come up often, and finishing them takes a fiddly routine.
  • Open-water swimming accuracy lags behind the pool.

Verdict

The Polar Grit X2 Pro is built for long days outdoors, with sapphire glass, 100 m water resistance and 40 h of GPS battery. Its dual-band GPS records clean tracks in dense forest and canyons. Offline topo maps and Komoot integration let you navigate without a phone, and the screen, at 1050 nits, stays readable in strong sun. The watch also checks blood oxygen and wrist ECG, and the Readiness score shows when to push or rest. There is no contactless payment, and the charging cable is proprietary, with no wireless charging. The case is 48.3 mm across, which is big for small wrists, and the Polar Flow app feels dated. It suits a hiker, trail runner or mountain cyclist with a larger wrist who wants one watch for multi-day trips.

Compare Polar Grit X2 Pro with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Polar Grit X2 Pro and other Smartwatches

No results found