OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartwatches Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v3.0

Google Pixel Watch 5 45mm review: 127 specs compared

Avg. price:~£?Screen size:1.4 inchBattery life:1 daysDisplay type:AMOLED

Google Pixel Watch 5 45mm Review: Compare 127 technical specifications, 24 expert and video reviews and 20 best-of lists to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

Google Pixel Watch 5 45mm
8.8/10

Overall score

Score
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 99% of models
Score components

35%

8.5

Technical score

30%

9.4

List score

25%

8.3

Reviews score

10%

9.6

Sentiment score

★Better than 99% of smartwatches
?

Value for money

Value for money
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.8

Overall score

30%

?

Price

Price not known yet
8.5

Technical score

Technical score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 95% of models
Score components

24%

8.7

Health

21%

9.1

Fitness

16%

6.3

Battery

14%

9.4

Smart features

12%

8.8

Connectivity

9%

8.4

Display & Design

4%

8.4

Hardware

★Better than 95%
8.3

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.5 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 76% of models

80%

8.2

Average grade

20%

8.4

Popularity

Grades by review (24)
2 reviews + 22 videos, average 8.3/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
▲Better than 76%
9.4

List score

List score
9.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (20)
List score: in 20 of 83 lists (24%)
★Better than 98%
  • google-pixel-watch-5-45mm
  • google-pixel-watch-5-45mm
  • google-pixel-watch-5-45mm
  • google-pixel-watch-5-45mm
  • google-pixel-watch-5-45mm
  • google-pixel-watch-5-45mm
  • google-pixel-watch-5-45mm
  • google-pixel-watch-5-45mm
  • google-pixel-watch-5-45mm
  • google-pixel-watch-5-45mm
  • google-pixel-watch-5-45mm
  • google-pixel-watch-5-45mm
google-pixel-watch-5-45mm
google-pixel-watch-5-45mm
google-pixel-watch-5-45mm
google-pixel-watch-5-45mm
google-pixel-watch-5-45mm
google-pixel-watch-5-45mm
google-pixel-watch-5-45mm
google-pixel-watch-5-45mm
google-pixel-watch-5-45mm
google-pixel-watch-5-45mm
google-pixel-watch-5-45mm
google-pixel-watch-5-45mm
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Google Pixel Watch 5 45mm

Technical score
Technical score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 95% of models
Score components:

24%

8.7

Health

21%

9.1

Fitness

16%

6.3

Battery

14%

9.4

Smart features

12%

8.8

Connectivity

9%

8.4

Display & Design

4%

8.4

Hardware

8.5
Reviews score
8.3
List score
9.4
Value for money
Value for money
9.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 99% of models
Score components:

70%

8.8

Overall score

30%

?

Price

9.2
Heart rate monitor
yes
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 9.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 30.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
yes
This smartwatch supports ECG. 82.1% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings. 49.5% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
HRV tracking
yes
This smartwatch supports HRV tracking. 54.9% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.5% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
yes
This smartwatch includes a barometer. 46.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 28.9% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
?
Distance tracking
yes
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 3.7% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
Battery life
1 day
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch lasts 1 days on a charge, which is shorter than 88.1% of Smartwatches and the same as 8.1% of Smartwatches.
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life with GPS on
?
Battery power
465 mAh
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a 465 mAh battery, which is larger than 83.8% of Smartwatches and the same as 0.1% of Smartwatches.
Charge time
60 min
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges from empty in 60 min, which is quicker than 83.8% of Smartwatches and the same as 12% of Smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Wear OS
This smartwatch runs Wear OS, which is more advanced than the system in 80.2% of Smartwatches and equal to 15.8% of Smartwatches.
Software update frequency
occasional
This smartwatch has occasional software update support which is more active than that of 54% of smartwatches and equal to that of 40.2% of smartwatches.
Third-party app support
yes
This smartwatch supports third-party apps. 48.5% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 30.8% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
yes
This smartwatch includes a cellular module. 83.5% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
?
GPS
yes
This smartwatch supports GPS. 40.3% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
?
Dual-frequency GPS
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen size
1.4 inch
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
This smartwatch has a 1.4 inch screen, which is larger than 48.9% of Smartwatches and the same as 6.7% of Smartwatches.
Display type
AMOLED
This smartwatch uses AMOLED, which is more advanced than the screen in 46.9% of Smartwatches and equal to 53.1% of Smartwatches.
Resolution
448x 448
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 448x448 which is higher than that of 75.4% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
453 ppi
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 453 ppi, which is higher than 75.6% of Smartwatches and equal to 2.3% of Smartwatches.
Display brightness
3,000 nits
Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
This smartwatch has a screen brightness of 3,000 nits, which is higher than 93.2% of Smartwatches and equal to 6.3% of Smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
?
Processor model
Snapdragon W5 Gen 2
This smartwatch uses the Snapdragon W5 Gen 2 processor model.
RAM
2 GB
Market range: <0.5 GB – >2 GB
This smartwatch has 2 GB of RAM, which is more than 76.4% of Smartwatches and equal to 22.3% of Smartwatches.
Internal storage
64 GB
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch has 64 GB of internal storage, which is more than 96.5% of Smartwatches and equal to 3.5% of Smartwatches.
External memory slot
no
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Google Pixel Watch 5 45mm vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • ECG support
    This smartwatch supports ECG, the average smartwatch does not. 18% of smartwatches support ECG.
  • 60 min quicker charging
    This smartwatch charges faster than the average smartwatch (60 min vs 120 min). The average smartwatch takes 120 min to charge from empty.
    60 min vs 120 min
  • Temperature sensing
    This smartwatch includes a temperature sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 31.9% of smartwatches include a temperature sensor.
  • More advanced operating system
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Wear OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Wear OS vs Proprietary OS
  • Crash detection capability
    This smartwatch supports crash detection, the average smartwatch does not. 14% of smartwatches support crash detection.
  • Built-in cellular module
    This smartwatch includes a cellular module, the average smartwatch does not. 16.6% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
  • Readiness score
    This smartwatch supports readiness scores, the average smartwatch does not. 19.8% of smartwatches support readiness scores.
  • Fall detection
    This smartwatch supports fall detection, the average smartwatch does not. 20.7% of smartwatches support fall detection.
  • 19.0% higher list score
    List score
    9.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
    How we count it
    Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
    Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
    Lists with this model (20)
    List score: in 20 of 83 lists (24%)
    9.4 vs 7.9
  • 18.6% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.5 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▲ Better than 76% of models

    80%

    8.2

    Average grade

    20%

    8.4

    Popularity

    Grades by review (24)
    2 reviews + 22 videos, average 8.3/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.3 vs 7.0
  • 28.0% higher sentiment score
    9.6 vs 7.5
  • 18.1% better value for money
    Google Pixel Watch 5 45mm has a higher value-for-money score than the average smartwatch (9.17 vs 7.8).
    9.17 vs 7.76
  • ECG support
    This smartwatch supports ECG, the average smartwatch does not. 18% of smartwatches support ECG.
  • Temperature sensing
    This smartwatch includes a temperature sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 31.9% of smartwatches include a temperature sensor.
  • Readiness score
    This smartwatch supports readiness scores, the average smartwatch does not. 19.8% of smartwatches support readiness scores.
  • HRV tracking
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 45.2% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • 5 years newer
    This smartwatch was released more recently than the average smartwatch (2026 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    2,026 vs 2,021
  • 60 min quicker charging
    This smartwatch charges faster than the average smartwatch (60 min vs 120 min). The average smartwatch takes 120 min to charge from empty.
    60 min vs 120 min
  • 160 mAh larger battery capacity
    This smartwatch has a larger battery than the average smartwatch (465 mAh vs 305 mAh). The average smartwatch has a 305 mAh battery.
    465 mAh vs 305 mAh
  • Built-in cellular module
    This smartwatch includes a cellular module, the average smartwatch does not. 16.6% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
  • Maps support
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 34.4% of smartwatches support maps.
  • NFC functionality
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 45.6% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.5% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • More current Bluetooth version
    This smartwatch uses a more current Bluetooth version than the average smartwatch (6 vs 5).
    6.0 vs 5.0
  • UWB chip
    This smartwatch includes a UWB chip, while the average smartwatch does not. 2.3% of smartwatches include UWB.
  • 2,250 nits brighter screen
    This smartwatch has a brighter screen than the average smartwatch (3000 nits vs 750 nits). The average smartwatch peaks at 750 nits.
    3,000 nits vs 750 nits
  • Stronger display glass
    This smartwatch uses Corning Gorilla Glass 5 display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 5 vs mineral glass
  • 127 ppi sharper screen
    This smartwatch has a sharper screen than the average smartwatch (453 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch has a pixel density of 326 ppi.
    453 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • 8.3 g lighter
    This smartwatch is lighter than the average smartwatch (36.7 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    36.7 g vs 45.0 g
  • Higher resolution
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 448x448, while the average smartwatch reaches 360x360.
    448x448 vs 360x360
  • More advanced operating system
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Wear OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Wear OS vs Proprietary OS
  • Crash detection capability
    This smartwatch supports crash detection, the average smartwatch does not. 14% of smartwatches support crash detection.
  • Fall detection
    This smartwatch supports fall detection, the average smartwatch does not. 20.7% of smartwatches support fall detection.
  • More frequent updates
    This smartwatch receives occasional software updates, while the average smartwatch receives ended updates.
    occasional vs ended
  • 16x more internal storage
    This smartwatch has more internal storage than the average smartwatch (64 GB vs 4 GB). The average smartwatch has 4 GB of internal storage.
    64 GB vs 4 GB
  • More advanced processor model
    This smartwatch uses the Snapdragon W5 Gen 2 processor model, while the average smartwatch uses Silicon Labs EFM32 Giant Gecko.
    Snapdragon W5 Gen 2 vs Silicon Labs EFM32 Giant Gecko
  • 2x more RAM
    This smartwatch has more RAM than the average smartwatch (2 GB vs 1 GB). The average smartwatch has 1 GB of RAM.
    2 GB vs 1 GB
  • No multi-sport mode
    This smartwatch does not include a multi-sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 71.7% of smartwatches include a multi-sport mode.
  • 6 days shorter battery life
    This smartwatch runs for less time per charge than the average smartwatch (1 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    1 days vs 7 days
  • No iOS support
    This smartwatch does not work with iOS devices, while the average smartwatch does. 94.6% of Smartwatches work with iOS devices.
  • Basic battery type
    This smartwatch uses a Li-ion battery, while the average smartwatch uses Li-Po.
    Li-ion vs Li-Po
  • No smart alarm
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 50.6% of smartwatches support smart alarms.
  • 0.6 mm thicker
    This smartwatch is thicker than the average smartwatch (12.3 mm vs 11.7 mm). The average smartwatch is 11.7 mm thick.
    12.3 mm vs 11.7 mm
  • No multi-sport mode
    This smartwatch does not include a multi-sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 71.7% of smartwatches include a multi-sport mode.
  • 6 days shorter battery life
    This smartwatch runs for less time per charge than the average smartwatch (1 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    1 days vs 7 days
  • Basic battery type
    This smartwatch uses a Li-ion battery, while the average smartwatch uses Li-Po.
    Li-ion vs Li-Po
  • No iOS support
    This smartwatch does not work with iOS devices, while the average smartwatch does. 94.6% of Smartwatches work with iOS devices.
  • 0.6 mm thicker
    This smartwatch is thicker than the average smartwatch (12.3 mm vs 11.7 mm). The average smartwatch is 11.7 mm thick.
    12.3 mm vs 11.7 mm
  • No smart alarm
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 50.6% of smartwatches support smart alarms.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Tech Spurt
≈ estimated
16/09/2026
Long-term test · one month of daily use
Verdict
Google Pixel Watch 5 45mm is better than expected overall, with an improved battery, but scratch-prone glass and a disliked strap hold it back.
8.0
Tech, Gadgets and Other Great Ideas
≈ estimated
13/09/2026
Pros and cons review · gestures, settings and software tests
Verdict
Google Pixel Watch 5 45mm is a strong watch with good gestures, but software gaps make the cheaper Pixel Watch 4 worth considering.
7.0
Everyday Legends
≈ estimated
02/09/2026
Hands-on review · new features, GPS and call tests
Verdict
Google Pixel Watch 5 45mm isn't worth it if you own the Watch 4, but is a worthwhile upgrade from Watch 3 or older.
8.0
9to5Google
≈ estimated
29/08/2026
Hands-on review · battery, fitness and upgrade value
Verdict
Google Pixel Watch 5 45mm is a great Android smartwatch, but the battery and small upgrade over Pixel Watch 4 give little urgency to buy.
9.0
The Product Reviewer
≈ estimated
29/08/2026
Hands-on review · daily use, GPS, sleep and battery tests
Verdict
Google Pixel Watch 5 45mm, the larger model, is the more attractive choice with a convincing overall package.
8.0
Top 8 TecH
≈ estimated
26/08/2026
Hands-on review · battery, charging, health and missing features
Verdict
Google Pixel Watch 5 45mm is easy to recommend overall, but some of its best features still feel unfinished.
9.0
DesFit
≈ estimated
19/08/2026
Hands-on review · GPS, heart rate and sports tests
Verdict
Google Pixel Watch 5 45mm is very strong for sports and fitness, with accurate GPS and heart rate, though treadmill distance was off.
8.0
Chase the Summit
≈ estimated
19/08/2026
Hands-on review · one week of daily use
Verdict
Google Pixel Watch 5 45mm is a great smartwatch, but only a small upgrade, so Pixel Watch 4 owners should not bother upgrading.
9.0
Shervin Shares
≈ estimated
19/08/2026
Week-long test · GPS and running tests
Verdict
Google Pixel Watch 5 45mm is a well-built watch that is good enough for marathon training and running in big cities.
8.0
DesFit
≈ estimated
12/08/2026
First look · corrected GPS tests in New York City
Verdict
Google Pixel Watch 5 45mm's post-activity GPS correction looks very impressive so far, though real-world testing is still ongoing.

What reviewers agree on

Based on 2 · 11

Battery life, accurate GPS and smooth software impress, but most say it barely improves on its predecessor and feels overpriced.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

9.0
androidheadlines.com
✓ explicit
24/08/2026
Long-term review · Wear OS watch
Verdict
The Pixel Watch 5 looks like a real watch, runs Wear OS 6 for 2.5 to 3 days per charge, but its display has no sapphire crystal.
9.0
global.techradar.com
≈ estimated
16/09/2026
Hands-on review · Wear OS watch
Verdict
The Pixel Watch 5 has very accurate GPS and sleep tracking, but it adds little new, and its battery lasts only 1.5 to 2 days.

Third-party reviews

What we like about Google Pixel Watch 5 45mm

  • Charging from 20 to 100 percent takes about 40 min in tests.
  • The 3000 nits screen stays readable in bright light.
  • ECG is built in.
  • Crash detection and fall detection are built in for safety.
  • GPS tracks are clear and accurate on outdoor runs.
  • A readiness score helps you choose between rest and hard training.

What we don't like about Google Pixel Watch 5 45mm

  • The battery is rated at 1 day, so charging is needed most days.
  • There is no multi-sport mode.
  • It does not work with an iPhone.
  • There is no blood pressure monitoring.
  • Health Coach and full sleep monitoring need a monthly subscription.

Verdict

Fast charging is the first thing to like about the Google Pixel Watch 5 45 mm. A full charge takes 60 min, and in tests charging from 20 to 100 percent takes about 40 min. The 3000 nits screen is bright, and the watch sits comfortably on a small wrist. Cellular, fall detection and crash detection are all built in. On outdoor runs, GPS tracks are clear, and heart rate readings are close to a chest strap in tests. The trade-off is what it leaves out: there is no multi-sport mode, and it does not work with an iPhone. Battery is rated at 1 day, and tests show about 2 days of mixed use. It suits Android owners who run or cycle outdoors and want a light watch with a bright screen and quick charging.

Compare Google Pixel Watch 5 45mm with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Google Pixel Watch 5 45mm and other Smartwatches

No results found