OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Smartwatches Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 3,488 independent expert reviews and 5,192 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v2.0

Oppo Watch X Review | 126 Data compared

Avg. price:~£290Screen size:1.43 inchBattery life:4 daysDisplay type:AMOLED

Oppo Watch X Review: Compare 126 technical specifications and 22 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

8.0

Overall score

Score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartwatch's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartwatches on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 84% of models
Score components

70%

7.9

Technical score

30%

8.3

Review score ( 10 · 12)

Review score 30% · 8.3 · based on 22 independent reviews
Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 30%, technical score 70%. This model has enough reviews, so its review score is the weighted average of their grades. 8 more reviews are not scored yet.
â–²Better than 84% of smartwatches
7.9

Technical score

Technical score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 84% of models
Score components

24%

6.7

Health

21%

9.6

Fitness

16%

6.6

Battery

14%

8.1

Smart features

12%

7.6

Connectivity

9%

9.0

Display & Design

4%

9.1

Hardware

â–²Better than 84% of smartwatches
8.3

Review score

Review score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 83% of models
Grades by review (22)
Text reviews 1
≈ estimated
1

6.2%

7.0

hi-tech.ua

Video reviews 7

3.1%

8.0

Dr HamezTech

3.1%

9.0

techENT

3.1%

9.0

Conor

3.1%

9.0

HansTechTalk

3.1%

8.0

Alex Kidman

3.1%

8.0

High Tech

3.1%

7.0

Isa Marcial Global

estimated from the review
10 reviews: 4 with a printed score, 6 estimated from the review. 12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
â–²Better than 83% of smartwatches
  • No image
No image

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Oppo Watch X

Technical score
Technical score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 84% of models
Score components:

24%

6.7

Health

21%

9.6

Fitness

16%

6.6

Battery

14%

8.1

Smart features

12%

7.6

Connectivity

9%

9.0

Display & Design

4%

9.1

Hardware

7.9
Review score
Review score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 83% of models
Grades by review (22)
Text reviews 1
≈ estimated
1

6.2%

7.0

hi-tech.ua

Video reviews 7

3.1%

8.0

Dr HamezTech

3.1%

9.0

techENT

3.1%

9.0

Conor

3.1%

9.0

HansTechTalk

3.1%

8.0

Alex Kidman

3.1%

8.0

High Tech

3.1%

7.0

Isa Marcial Global

estimated from the review
10 reviews: 4 with a printed score, 6 estimated from the review. 12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
8.3
Value for money
Value for money
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 83% of models
Score components:

60%

8.0

Overall score

40%

9.0

Price

8.3
Brand name
Oppo
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
â–² Better than 11% of models
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 10.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
â–² Better than 33% of models
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 33.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
ECG
no
â–¼ Worse than 17% of models
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
â–² Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings. 51.9% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
Supports abnormal high/low heart-rate alerts (typically after inactivity).
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
Accelerometer
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.6% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
yes
Barometer
yes
â–² Better than 51% of models
This smartwatch includes a barometer. 50.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
Gyroscope
yes
â–² Better than 30% of models
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 30.2% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
yes
Cadence sensor
yes
â–² Better than 69% of models
This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor. 69% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
Distance tracking
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 4.1% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery life
4 days
Battery life
4 days
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch offers a battery life of 4 days which is shorter than that of 70.5% of smartwatches and equal to that of 2.9% of smartwatches.
Up to 12 days in power saving.
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life with GPS on
26 h
Battery life with GPS on
26 h
â–² Better than 66% of models
Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
This smartwatch lasts 26 h with GPS on which is longer than 66.5% of smartwatches and equal to that of 1.6% of smartwatches.
Battery power
465 mAh
Battery power
465 mAh
â–² Better than 88% of models
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a battery capacity of 465 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 88% of smartwatches.
Battery capacity varies by case size/model variant.
Charge time
60 min
Charge time
60 min
â–² Better than 83% of models
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges in 60 min which is faster than 82.6% of smartwatches and equal to the charge time of 12.1% of smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Wear OS
Operating system
Wear OS
â–² Better than 79% of models
This smartwatch runs Wear OS which is more advanced than the operating system in 79% of smartwatches and the same as that in 16.6% of smartwatches.
Software update frequency
occasional
Software update frequency
occasional
â–² Better than 58% of models
This smartwatch has occasional software update support which is more active than that of 57.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 36.2% of smartwatches.
Updates are typically released about every 3 months.
Third-party app support
yes
Third-party app support
yes
â–² Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports third-party apps. 52.4% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
Voice assistant support
yes
â–² Better than 32% of models
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 32.4% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
Cellular module
no
â–¼ Worse than 18% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 18% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
1
SIM cards
1
â–² Better than 2% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This smartwatch uses 1 for cellular connectivity which is more advanced than that of 2% of smartwatches and the same as that of 98% of smartwatches.
eSIM
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
â–² Better than 44% of models
This smartwatch supports GPS. 43.9% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
yes
Galileo support
yes
â–² Better than 62% of models
This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation. 61.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Compass
yes
Compass
yes
â–² Better than 47% of models
This smartwatch includes a compass. 47.5% of smartwatches include a compass.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen size
1.43 inch
Screen size
1.43 inch
â–² Better than 56% of models
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
This smartwatch has a screen size of 1.43 inch which is larger than the screens of 56.3% of smartwatches and equal to those of 8.2% of smartwatches.
Display type
AMOLED
Display type
AMOLED
â–² Better than 50% of models
This smartwatch uses a AMOLED display type which is more advanced than that of 49.9% of smartwatches and the same as that of 50.1% of smartwatches.
Resolution
466x 466
Resolution
466x 466
â–² Better than 87% of models
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 466x466 which is higher than that of 87.4% of smartwatches and equal to that of 10.9% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
461 ppi
Pixel density
461 ppi
â–² Better than 84% of models
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 461 ppi which is higher than that of 84.5% of smartwatches and equal to that of 6.5% of smartwatches.
Display brightness
1,000 nits
Display brightness
1,000 nits
â–² Better than 59% of models
Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
This smartwatch reaches 1,000 nits of display brightness, which is higher than that of 59.4% of smartwatches and equal to that of 26.5% of smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
4x 1.7 GHz
CPU speed
4x 1.7 GHz
★ Better than 91% of models
This smartwatch uses a CPU configuration of 4x1.7 GHz which is faster than that in 90.8% of smartwatches and equal to that in 8% of smartwatches.
Derived from core-count and per-core clock notation
Processor model
Snapdragon W5 Gen 1
Processor model
Snapdragon W5 Gen 1
â–² Better than 80% of models
This smartwatch uses the Snapdragon W5 Gen 1 processor model.
With BES2700BP co-processor.
RAM
2 GB
RAM
2 GB
â–² Better than 78% of models
Market range: <0.5 GB – >2 GB
This smartwatch has 2 GB of RAM which is larger than the RAM in 77.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 21.4% of smartwatches.
Internal storage
32 GB
Internal storage
32 GB
â–² Better than 85% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch uses 32 GB for internal storage which is larger than that of 84.7% of smartwatches and equal to that of 13.4% of smartwatches.
External memory slot
no
External memory slot
no
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more
What reviewers say

Oppo Watch X vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • 60 min shorter charge time
    Charge time
    60 min
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    Market range: <60 min – >150 min
    This smartwatch charges faster than the average smartwatch (60 min vs 120 min). The average smartwatch charges in 120 min.
    60 min vs 120 min
  • More advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Wear OS
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Wear OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Wear OS vs Proprietary OS
  • Stronger display glass
    Display glass type
    sapphire
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    This smartwatch uses sapphire display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    sapphire vs mineral glass
  • Maps support
    Maps support
    yes
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 31.5% of smartwatches support maps.
    Maps via Google Maps app.
  • VO2 max measurement
    VO2 max measurement
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch measures VO2 max, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • Emergency SOS
    Emergency SOS
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch includes Emergency SOS, the average smartwatch does not. 42.8% of smartwatches include Emergency SOS.
  • NFC functionality
    NFC
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 43.4% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • Third-party app support
    Third-party app support
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports third-party apps, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • 10.5% better value for money
    Oppo Watch X has a higher value-for-money score than the average smartwatch (8.31 vs 7.5).
    8.31 vs 7.52
  • VO2 max measurement
    VO2 max measurement
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch measures VO2 max, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • Irregular heart rate alerts
    Irregular heart rate warnings
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does not. 48.1% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
    Supports abnormal high/low heart-rate alerts (typically after inactivity).
  • Calorie tracking
    Calorie tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.6% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
  • Barometer sensor included
    Barometer
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This smartwatch includes a barometer, the average smartwatch does not. 49.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • Cadence tracking
    Cadence sensor
    yes
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 31.1% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
  • Route support
    Route support
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch supports route support, the average smartwatch does not. 50% of smartwatches support route support.
  • 20 more exercise profiles
    Multi-sport mode
    100
    â–² Better than 32% of models
    This smartwatch supports more exercise modes than the average smartwatch (100 vs 80). The average smartwatch supports 80 exercise modes.
    Reported as at least 100 exercise modes.
    100 vs 80
  • 60 min shorter charge time
    Charge time
    60 min
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    Market range: <60 min – >150 min
    This smartwatch charges faster than the average smartwatch (60 min vs 120 min). The average smartwatch charges in 120 min.
    60 min vs 120 min
  • 165 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery life
    465 mAh days
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch has a larger battery capacity than the average smartwatch (465 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    Up to 12 days in power saving.
    465 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • 6 h longer GPS battery life
    Battery life with GPS on
    26 h
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
    This smartwatch lasts longer with GPS on than the average smartwatch (26 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h.
    26 h vs 20 h
  • Maps support
    Maps support
    yes
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 31.5% of smartwatches support maps.
    Maps via Google Maps app.
  • NFC functionality
    NFC
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 43.4% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    Wi-Fi support
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.3% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • Galileo satellite support
    Galileo support
    yes
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation, the average smartwatch does not. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
  • Stronger display glass
    Display glass type
    sapphire
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    This smartwatch uses sapphire display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    sapphire vs mineral glass
  • Rugged construction
    Rugged design
    yes
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This smartwatch has a rugged design, the average smartwatch does not. 37.9% of smartwatches have a rugged design.
    Rugged design supported by MIL-STD/military-grade durability claim.
  • 400 nits higher display brightness
    Display brightness
    1,000 nits
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
    This smartwatch has higher display brightness than the average smartwatch (1000 nits vs 600 nits). The average smartwatch reaches 600 nits.
    1,000 nits vs 600 nits
  • 135 ppi higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    461 ppi
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
    This smartwatch has a higher pixel density than the average smartwatch (461 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch display reaches 326 ppi.
    461 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • Better case material
    Case material
    aluminum, stainless steel
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    This smartwatch uses aluminum, stainless steel for the case material, while the average smartwatch uses polycarbonate.
    aluminum, stainless steel vs polycarbonate
  • Higher resolution
    Display type
    466 x 466
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 466x466, while the average smartwatch reaches 352x430.
    466x466 vs 352x430
  • More advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Wear OS
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Wear OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Wear OS vs Proprietary OS
  • Emergency SOS
    Emergency SOS
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch includes Emergency SOS, the average smartwatch does not. 42.8% of smartwatches include Emergency SOS.
  • Third-party app support
    Third-party app support
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports third-party apps, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • More frequent updates
    Software update frequency
    occasional
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    This smartwatch receives occasional software updates, while the average smartwatch receives ended updates.
    Updates are typically released about every 3 months.
    occasional vs ended
  • 28 GB more storage
    Internal storage
    32 GB
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
    This smartwatch offers more internal storage than the average smartwatch (32 GB vs 4 GB). The average smartwatch provides 4 GB of storage.
    32 GB vs 4 GB
  • 1 GB more RAM
    RAM
    2 GB
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <0.5 GB – >2 GB
    This smartwatch has more RAM than the average smartwatch (2 GB vs 1 GB). The average smartwatch includes 1 GB of RAM.
    2 GB vs 1 GB
  • Faster CPU speed
    CPU speed
    4 x 1.7 GHz
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    This smartwatch uses a CPU configuration of 4x1.7 GHz, while the average smartwatch uses 1 GHz.
    Derived from core-count and per-core clock notation
    4x1.7 GHz vs 1 GHz
  • 3 year/s newer release date
    Release date
    2024
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This smartwatch has a newer release date than the average smartwatch (2024 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    March 2024
    2024 vs 2021
  • More advanced processor model
    Processor model
    Snapdragon W5 Gen 1
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    This smartwatch uses the Snapdragon W5 Gen 1 processor model, while the average smartwatch uses Silicon Labs EFM32 Giant Gecko.
    With BES2700BP co-processor.
    Snapdragon W5 Gen 1 vs Silicon Labs EFM32 Giant Gecko
  • No iOS compatibility
    iOS compatibility
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    This smartwatch offers less complete iOS compatibility than the average smartwatch (no vs yes).
  • 3 days day/s shorter battery life
    Battery life
    4 days
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 4 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    Up to 12 days in power saving.
    4 days vs 7 days
  • Basic battery type
    Battery type
    Li-ion
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartwatch uses a Li-ion battery, while the average smartwatch uses Li-Po.
    Li-ion vs Li-Po
  • 2.23x more expensive
    Oppo Watch X is more expensive than the average smartwatch (£290 vs £130).
    £290 vs £130
  • 4.6 mm wider watch width
    Width
    46.6 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    Market range: <34.6 mm – >46.8 mm
    This smartwatch is wider than the average smartwatch (46.6 mm vs 42 mm). The average smartwatch width is 42.0 mm.
    46.6 mm vs 42.0 mm
  • 0.5 mm thicker watch body
    Thickness
    12.10 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    Market range: <9.8 mm – >14.1 mm
    This smartwatch is thicker than the average smartwatch (12.1 mm vs 11.6 mm). The average smartwatch thickness is 11.6 mm.
    12.10 mm vs 11.6 mm
  • 10 °C lower max temperature
    Maximum operating temperature
    35.0 °C
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
    Market range: <35 °C – >60 °C
    This smartwatch handles a lower maximum operating temperature than the average smartwatch (35 °C vs 45 °C). The average smartwatch reaches 45.0 °C.
    35.0 °C vs 45.0 °C
  • 4 g heavier weight
    Weight
    49.0 g
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is heavier than the average smartwatch (49 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    Weight refers to watch case without strap/band.
    49.0 g vs 45.0 g
  • 2.23x more expensive
    Oppo Watch X is more expensive than the average smartwatch (£290 vs £130).
    £290 vs £130
  • 3 days day/s shorter battery life
    Battery life
    4 days
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 4 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    Up to 12 days in power saving.
    4 days vs 7 days
  • Basic battery type
    Battery type
    Li-ion
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartwatch uses a Li-ion battery, while the average smartwatch uses Li-Po.
    Li-ion vs Li-Po
  • No iOS compatibility
    iOS compatibility
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    This smartwatch offers less complete iOS compatibility than the average smartwatch (no vs yes).
  • 4.6 mm wider watch width
    Width
    46.6 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    Market range: <34.6 mm – >46.8 mm
    This smartwatch is wider than the average smartwatch (46.6 mm vs 42 mm). The average smartwatch width is 42.0 mm.
    46.6 mm vs 42.0 mm
  • 0.5 mm thicker watch body
    Thickness
    12.10 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    Market range: <9.8 mm – >14.1 mm
    This smartwatch is thicker than the average smartwatch (12.1 mm vs 11.6 mm). The average smartwatch thickness is 11.6 mm.
    12.10 mm vs 11.6 mm
  • 4 g heavier weight
    Weight
    49.0 g
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is heavier than the average smartwatch (49 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    Weight refers to watch case without strap/band.
    49.0 g vs 45.0 g
  • 10 °C lower max temperature
    Maximum operating temperature
    35.0 °C
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
    Market range: <35 °C – >60 °C
    This smartwatch handles a lower maximum operating temperature than the average smartwatch (35 °C vs 45 °C). The average smartwatch reaches 45.0 °C.
    35.0 °C vs 45.0 °C
  • 2 mm taller watch height
    Height
    47.0 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <39.5 mm – >51 mm
    This smartwatch is taller than the average smartwatch (47 mm vs 45 mm). The average smartwatch height is 45 mm.
    47.0 mm vs 45 mm
  • Basic band material
    Band material
    silicone, rubber
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    This smartwatch uses silicone, rubber for the band material, while the average smartwatch uses silicone.
    silicone, rubber vs silicone

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
techENT
≈ estimated
08/05/2025
Full review · design, health tracking and durability
Verdict
Oppo Watch X is one of the best all-round packages available, with a durable build and accurate tracking.
7.0
Isa Marcial Global
≈ estimated
29/12/2024
Detailed review · design, health, battery and software tests
Verdict
Oppo Watch X has good battery life and Wear OS features, but limited system apps and no camera shutter control make it disappointing for the price.
9.0
Conor
≈ estimated
26/07/2024
Hands-on review · daily use, fitness and battery tests
Verdict
Oppo Watch X is recommended for Android users, but its delayed live GPS and some reservations for serious runners are worth considering.
8.0
Alex Kidman
≈ estimated
18/07/2024
Hands-on review · two weeks of battery and fitness tests
Verdict
Oppo Watch X is a good option, as its standout battery life outweighs its large size and Android-only support.
8.0
Dr HamezTech
✓ explicit
24/04/2024
Daily use review · several weeks with the watch
Verdict
Oppo Watch X is a recommended daily smartwatch with a premium design and strong battery life, though it is heavy.
9.0
HansTechTalk
≈ estimated
09/04/2024
Daily-driver review · eSIM, battery, health and toughness
Verdict
Oppo Watch X is strongly recommended as a daily driver, especially for eSIM, battery life, toughness and fast charging.
8.0
High Tech
≈ estimated
26/03/2024
Review and unboxing · battery, sensors and features
Verdict
Oppo Watch X has a strong battery and build, held back by a weak speaker, no music playback and Android-only support.

What reviewers agree on

Based on 10 · 12

Reviewers praise the strong battery, design and sport tracking, but find it bulky and grumble about patchy connectivity.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

7.0
hi-tech.ua
≈ estimated
05/09/2024
Hands-on test · Design and battery
Verdict
The Oppo Watch X suits buyers who want a classic-looking watch with 3-4 days of battery, though it is heavy for its size and not for deep water.
root-nation.com
15/08/2024
Not graded yet
tech360.tv
16/03/2024
Not graded yet
tatlerasia.com
22/03/2024
Not graded yet
nasilemaktech.com
29/02/2024
Not graded yet
de.root-nation.com
15/08/2024
Not graded yet
6.0
lesnumeriques.com
✓ explicit
19/12/2024
Hands-on test · Fitness and health
Verdict
The Oppo Watch X is a comfortable Wear OS watch that lasts about four days and charges in under an hour, but its heart-rate sensor struggles during intervals.
7.0
journaldugeek.com
✓ explicit
07/04/2025
Hands-on test · Battery and sensors
Verdict
The Oppo Watch X lasts about four days with its two-chip design and charges fully in an hour, but it lacks the ECG and fall detection found on rivals.
9.0
cadeausympa.fr
≈ estimated
13/12/2024
Hands-on test · Charging and battery
Verdict
The Oppo Watch X is a comfortable Wear OS watch with a vivid screen and about three days of battery, but its case suits larger wrists best.
fr.root-nation.com
15/08/2024
Not graded yet
9.0
andreagaleazzi.com
≈ estimated
07/10/2024
Hands-on test · Battery and setup
Verdict
The Oppo Watch X is a Wear OS watch that lasts up to three days per charge and sets up in a few taps, though its vibration could be better.
9.0
tomshw.it
✓ explicit
30/07/2024
Hands-on test · Dual-chip design
Verdict
The Oppo Watch X is a solid Wear OS watch whose battery lasts about three days, though its crown does nothing when turned and it has no ECG.
9.0
techprincess.it
≈ estimated
30/07/2024
Hands-on test · Battery and fitness
Verdict
The Oppo Watch X suits everyday amateur athletes, lasting three or four days on a charge, though it lacks ECG and does not work with iPhone.
8.2
techzilla.it
✓ explicit
24/10/2024
Hands-on test · Wear OS features
Verdict
The Oppo Watch X is a sturdy Wear OS watch with a clear screen and Google Wallet, but it doesn't work with iPhone.
9.0
mistergadget.tech
≈ estimated
24/07/2024
Hands-on test · Battery and sleep
Verdict
The Oppo Watch X is basically the OnePlus Watch 2, lasting about four days with the always-on screen off, but it does not work with iPhone.
it.root-nation.com
15/08/2024
Not graded yet
evosmart.it
01/07/2024
Not graded yet
8.0
nl.root-nation.com
≈ estimated
15/08/2024
Hands-on review · Two-chip design
Verdict
The Oppo Watch X runs smoothly on Wear OS with a sunlight-readable screen, though its strap irritated the reviewer's skin and it has no cellular connection.

Third-party reviews

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Oppo Watch X

  • Exceptional battery life, lasting up to 100 hours in Smart Mode and 12 days in Power Saver Mode.
  • Dual-engine architecture (Snapdragon W5 + BES2700) provides smooth, lag-free performance.
  • Stunning 1.43-inch AMOLED display with high brightness (up to 1000 nits) for excellent sunlight legibility.
  • Highly durable build featuring sapphire crystal glass and a stainless steel case with MIL-STD-810H rating.
  • Comprehensive fitness tracking with over 100 sports modes, including specialized modes like Badminton.
  • Fast charging capabilities, providing a full day of use from just a 10-minute charge.
  • Full access to the Google Wear OS ecosystem, including Google Wallet, Maps, and Play Store apps.

What we don't like about Oppo Watch X

  • Large and bulky design that may feel too heavy or oversized for users with smaller wrists.
  • Lack of advanced health features found on competitors, such as ECG functionality or LTE connectivity.
  • Proprietary contact charging system instead of universal wireless charging.
  • The rotating crown button does not actually scroll through menus, which some find unintuitive.
  • Software confusion between the China version (ColorOS) and Global version (Wear OS) for some buyers.
  • Requires the proprietary 'OHealth' app for full functionality, which some users find restrictive.

Verdict

The Oppo Watch X is a premium Wear OS 4 smartwatch featuring a 1.43-inch AMOLED display (466x466 resolution) protected by scratch-resistant sapphire crystal and a 47mm stainless steel case with MIL-STD-810H military-grade durability. It is powered by a dual-engine architecture consisting of the Snapdragon W5 Gen 1 flagship chip and a BES2700 efficiency processor, supported by 2GB of RAM and 32GB of storage. Key pros include an industry-leading battery life of up to 100 hours in 'Smart Mode' (and 12 days in 'Power Saver'), dual-frequency GPS (L1+L5) for precise tracking, and 5ATM/IP68 water resistance. However, notable cons include the lack of advanced health sensors like ECG or blood pressure monitoring, no cellular/eSIM support for standalone use, and a proprietary pogo-pin charging puck instead of standard wireless charging.

Compare Oppo Watch X with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Oppo Watch X and other Smartwatches

No results found