OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Smartwatches Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 3,488 independent expert reviews and 5,192 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v2.0

Huawei Watch GT 3 Pro Ceramic Review | 126 Data compared

Avg. price:~£300Screen size:1.32 inchBattery life:7 daysDisplay type:AMOLED

Huawei Watch GT 3 Pro Ceramic Review: Compare 126 technical specifications and 22 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

8.3

Overall score

Score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartwatch's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartwatches on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 91% of models
Score components

70%

8.4

Technical score

30%

8.0

Review score ( 10 · 12)

Review score 30% · 8.0 · based on 22 independent reviews
Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 30%, technical score 70%. This model has enough reviews, so its review score is the weighted average of their grades. 9 more reviews are not scored yet.
★Better than 91% of smartwatches
8.4

Technical score

Technical score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 93% of models
Score components

24%

8.5

Health

21%

10

Fitness

16%

5.2

Battery

14%

9.6

Smart features

12%

8.2

Connectivity

9%

8.5

Display & Design

4%

8.3

Hardware

★Better than 93% of smartwatches
8.0

Review score

Review score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 66% of models
Grades by review (22)
10 reviews: 5 with a printed score, 5 estimated from the review. 12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 6
✓ explicit
5

8.1%

8.0

expertreviews.co.uk

8.1%

8.0

techradar.com

6.5%

9.0

digitalcitizen.life

6.5%

8.5

phonearena.com

6.5%

8.0

irishtimes.com

≈ estimated
1

6.5%

9.0

buro247.my

Video reviews 3

3.2%

9.0

Bench House

3.2%

8.0

PACE MAX PRO

3.2%

6.0

Thao Huynh

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
â–²Better than 66% of smartwatches
  • huawei-watch-gt-3-pro-ceramic
  • huawei-watch-gt-3-pro-ceramic
  • huawei-watch-gt-3-pro-ceramic
  • huawei-watch-gt-3-pro-ceramic
  • huawei-watch-gt-3-pro-ceramic
  • huawei-watch-gt-3-pro-ceramic
  • huawei-watch-gt-3-pro-ceramic
  • huawei-watch-gt-3-pro-ceramic
huawei-watch-gt-3-pro-ceramic
huawei-watch-gt-3-pro-ceramic
huawei-watch-gt-3-pro-ceramic
huawei-watch-gt-3-pro-ceramic
huawei-watch-gt-3-pro-ceramic
huawei-watch-gt-3-pro-ceramic
huawei-watch-gt-3-pro-ceramic
huawei-watch-gt-3-pro-ceramic

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Huawei Watch GT 3 Pro Ceramic

Technical score
Technical score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 93% of models
Score components:

24%

8.5

Health

21%

10

Fitness

16%

5.2

Battery

14%

9.6

Smart features

12%

8.2

Connectivity

9%

8.5

Display & Design

4%

8.3

Hardware

8.4
Review score
Review score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 66% of models
Grades by review (22)
10 reviews: 5 with a printed score, 5 estimated from the review. 12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 6
✓ explicit
5

8.1%

8.0

expertreviews.co.uk

8.1%

8.0

techradar.com

6.5%

9.0

digitalcitizen.life

6.5%

8.5

phonearena.com

6.5%

8.0

irishtimes.com

≈ estimated
1

6.5%

9.0

buro247.my

Video reviews 3

3.2%

9.0

Bench House

3.2%

8.0

PACE MAX PRO

3.2%

6.0

Thao Huynh

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
8.0
Popularity
Popularity
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartwatch.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 60% of models
Popularity:
Huawei Watch GT 3 Pro Ceramic has a popularity of 7.2 points, which is higher than 60.5% of smartwatches.
7.2
Value for money
Value for money
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 90% of models
Score components:

60%

8.3

Overall score

40%

8.9

Price

8.5
Brand name
Huawei
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
â–² Better than 11% of models
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 10.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
â–² Better than 33% of models
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 33.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
yes
ECG
yes
â–² Better than 84% of models
This smartwatch supports ECG. 83.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
Availability may vary by region or model version.
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
â–² Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings. 51.9% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
Accelerometer
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.6% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
yes
Barometer
yes
â–² Better than 51% of models
This smartwatch includes a barometer. 50.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
Gyroscope
yes
â–² Better than 30% of models
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 30.2% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
yes
Cadence sensor
yes
â–² Better than 69% of models
This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor. 69% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
Distance tracking
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 4.1% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery life
7 days
Battery life
7 days
â–¼ Worse than 44% of models
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch offers a battery life of 7 days which is longer than that of 38.7% of smartwatches and equal to that of 17.1% of smartwatches.
Battery life in training mode
8 h
Battery life in training mode
8 h
â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
This smartwatch lasts 8 h in training mode which is shorter than 73.4% of smartwatches and equal to that of 3.9% of smartwatches.
6-hour gps tracking, but no dedicated training mode.
Battery life with GPS on
7.5 h
Battery life with GPS on
7.5 h
â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
This smartwatch lasts 7.5 h with GPS on which is shorter than 80.8% of smartwatches.
8 (in training mode.
Battery power
292 mAh
Battery power
292 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a battery capacity of 292 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 56.7% of smartwatches and equal to those in 0.2% of smartwatches.
Battery capacity varies by case size/model variant.
Charge time
85 min
Charge time
85 min
â–² Better than 74% of models
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges in 85 min which is faster than 73.7% of smartwatches and equal to the charge time of 0.8% of smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
HarmonyOS
Operating system
HarmonyOS
â–² Better than 67% of models
This smartwatch runs HarmonyOS which is more advanced than the operating system in 66.9% of smartwatches and the same as that in 4.1% of smartwatches.
Software update frequency
occasional
Software update frequency
occasional
â–² Better than 58% of models
This smartwatch has occasional software update support which is more active than that of 57.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 36.2% of smartwatches.
Third-party app support
yes
Third-party app support
yes
â–² Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports third-party apps. 52.4% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Support is limited to official app stores/approved app selection.
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
Voice assistant support
yes
â–² Better than 32% of models
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 32.4% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
Cellular module
no
â–¼ Worse than 18% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 18% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
â–² Better than 44% of models
This smartwatch supports GPS. 43.9% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
yes
Galileo support
yes
â–² Better than 62% of models
This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation. 61.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Compass
yes
Compass
yes
â–² Better than 47% of models
This smartwatch includes a compass. 47.5% of smartwatches include a compass.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen size
1.32 inch
Screen size
1.32 inch
â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
This smartwatch has a screen size of 1.32 inch which is smaller than the screens of 63.8% of smartwatches and equal to those of 2.8% of smartwatches.
Display type
AMOLED
Display type
AMOLED
â–² Better than 50% of models
This smartwatch uses a AMOLED display type which is more advanced than that of 49.9% of smartwatches and the same as that of 50.1% of smartwatches.
Resolution
466x 466
Resolution
466x 466
â–² Better than 87% of models
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 466x466 which is higher than that of 87.4% of smartwatches and equal to that of 10.9% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
499 ppi
Pixel density
499 ppi
★ Better than 99% of models
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 499 ppi which is higher than that of 98.5% of smartwatches and equal to that of 1.2% of smartwatches.
Display brightness
600 nits
Display brightness
600 nits
â–¼ Worse than 47% of models
Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
This smartwatch reaches 600 nits of display brightness, which is higher than that of 38.8% of smartwatches and equal to that of 14.1% of smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
?
Processor model
?
RAM
?
Internal storage
32 GB
Internal storage
32 GB
â–² Better than 85% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch uses 32 GB for internal storage which is larger than that of 84.7% of smartwatches and equal to that of 13.4% of smartwatches.
External memory slot
no
External memory slot
no
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more
What reviewers say

Huawei Watch GT 3 Pro Ceramic vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • ECG support
    ECG
    yes
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    This smartwatch supports ECG, the average smartwatch does not. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
    Availability may vary by region or model version.
  • Temperature sensing
    Temperature sensor
    yes
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This smartwatch includes a temperature sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 26.8% of smartwatches include a temperature sensor.
    Temperature readings may be skin/ambient trends, not core-body medical values.
  • Crash detection capability
    Crash detection
    yes
    â–² Better than 87% of models
    This smartwatch supports crash detection, the average smartwatch does not. 12.6% of smartwatches support crash detection.
  • Fall detection
    Fall detection
    yes
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    This smartwatch supports fall detection, the average smartwatch does not. 21.3% of smartwatches support fall detection.
  • HRV tracking
    HRV tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 40.8% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • Stronger display glass
    Display glass type
    sapphire
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    This smartwatch uses sapphire display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    sapphire vs mineral glass
  • Maps support
    Maps support
    yes
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 31.5% of smartwatches support maps.
    Maps via Petal Maps app.
  • VO2 max measurement
    VO2 max measurement
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch measures VO2 max, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • 12.7% better value for money
    RAM
    8.47 GB
    Category Benchmark
    Market range: <0.5 GB – >2 GB
    This smartwatch has a higher value-for-money score than the average smartwatch (8.47 vs 7.5).
    8.47 vs 7.52
  • ECG support
    ECG
    yes
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    This smartwatch supports ECG, the average smartwatch does not. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
    Availability may vary by region or model version.
  • Temperature sensing
    Temperature sensor
    yes
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This smartwatch includes a temperature sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 26.8% of smartwatches include a temperature sensor.
    Temperature readings may be skin/ambient trends, not core-body medical values.
  • HRV tracking
    HRV tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 40.8% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • VO2 max measurement
    VO2 max measurement
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch measures VO2 max, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • Irregular heart rate alerts
    Irregular heart rate warnings
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does not. 48.1% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • Calorie tracking
    Calorie tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.6% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
  • Weight tracking
    Weight tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This smartwatch supports weight tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 39.1% of smartwatches support weight tracking.
    Tracked through the companion app or smart-scale sync.
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    This smartwatch tracks water intake, the average smartwatch does not. 44% of smartwatches track water intake.
    Water intake tracking may require manual logging in a companion app or widget.
  • External heart rate monitor support
    External heart rate monitor compatibility
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports external heart rate monitor compatibility, the average smartwatch does not. 42.7% of smartwatches support external heart rate monitor compatibility.
  • Barometer sensor included
    Barometer
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This smartwatch includes a barometer, the average smartwatch does not. 49.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • Cadence tracking
    Cadence sensor
    yes
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 31.1% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
  • Route support
    Route support
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch supports route support, the average smartwatch does not. 50% of smartwatches support route support.
  • 20 more exercise profiles
    Multi-sport mode
    100
    â–² Better than 32% of models
    This smartwatch supports more exercise modes than the average smartwatch (100 vs 80). The average smartwatch supports 80 exercise modes.
    Reported as at least 100 exercise modes.
    100 vs 80
  • Supports wireless charging
    Wireless charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    This smartwatch supports wireless charging, the average smartwatch does not. 24.5% of smartwatches support wireless charging.
  • 35 min shorter charge time
    Charge time
    85 min
    â–² Better than 74% of models
    Market range: <60 min – >150 min
    This smartwatch charges faster than the average smartwatch (85 min vs 120 min). The average smartwatch charges in 120 min.
    85 min vs 120 min
  • Maps support
    Maps support
    yes
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 31.5% of smartwatches support maps.
    Maps via Petal Maps app.
  • NFC functionality
    NFC
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 43.4% of smartwatches support NFC.
    NFC hardware is present, but functionality may be limited by region/app support.
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    Wi-Fi support
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.3% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • Galileo satellite support
    Galileo support
    yes
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation, the average smartwatch does not. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.2
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This smartwatch supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average smartwatch (5.2 vs 5). The average smartwatch uses 5.0.
    5.2 vs 5.0
  • Stronger display glass
    Display glass type
    sapphire
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    This smartwatch uses sapphire display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    sapphire vs mineral glass
  • Rugged construction
    Rugged design
    yes
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This smartwatch has a rugged design, the average smartwatch does not. 37.9% of smartwatches have a rugged design.
  • 173 ppi higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    499 ppi
    ★ Better than 99% of models
    Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
    This smartwatch has a higher pixel density than the average smartwatch (499 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch display reaches 326 ppi.
    499 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • Better case material
    Case material
    stainless steel, ceramic
    â–² Better than 89% of models
    This smartwatch uses stainless steel, ceramic for the case material, while the average smartwatch uses polycarbonate.
    nanocrystal ceramic case
    stainless steel, ceramic vs polycarbonate
  • Higher resolution
    Display type
    466 x 466
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 466x466, while the average smartwatch reaches 352x430.
    466x466 vs 352x430
  • 1.1 mm thinner watch body
    Thickness
    10.50 mm
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    Market range: <9.8 mm – >14.1 mm
    This smartwatch is thinner than the average smartwatch (10.5 mm vs 11.6 mm). The average smartwatch thickness is 11.6 mm.
    10.50 mm vs 11.6 mm
  • Better band material
    Band material
    leather
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    This smartwatch uses leather for the band material, while the average smartwatch uses silicone.
    leather vs silicone
  • Crash detection capability
    Crash detection
    yes
    â–² Better than 87% of models
    This smartwatch supports crash detection, the average smartwatch does not. 12.6% of smartwatches support crash detection.
  • Fall detection
    Fall detection
    yes
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    This smartwatch supports fall detection, the average smartwatch does not. 21.3% of smartwatches support fall detection.
  • Emergency SOS
    Emergency SOS
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch includes Emergency SOS, the average smartwatch does not. 42.8% of smartwatches include Emergency SOS.
  • Third-party app support
    Third-party app support
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports third-party apps, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
    Support is limited to official app stores/approved app selection.
  • More advanced operating system
    Operating system
    HarmonyOS
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (HarmonyOS vs Proprietary OS).
    HarmonyOS vs Proprietary OS
  • More frequent updates
    Software update frequency
    occasional
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    This smartwatch receives occasional software updates, while the average smartwatch receives ended updates.
    occasional vs ended
  • 28 GB more storage
    Internal storage
    32 GB
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
    This smartwatch offers more internal storage than the average smartwatch (32 GB vs 4 GB). The average smartwatch provides 4 GB of storage.
    32 GB vs 4 GB
  • 12.5 h shorter GPS battery life
    Battery life with GPS on
    7.5 h
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
    Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
    This smartwatch lasts less with GPS on than the average smartwatch (7.5 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h.
    8 (in training mode.
    7.5 h vs 20 h
  • 11.25 h shorter training battery life
    Battery life in training mode
    8 h
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
    This smartwatch lasts less in training mode than the average smartwatch (8 h vs 19.25 h). The average smartwatch lasts 19.25 h.
    6-hour gps tracking, but no dedicated training mode.
    8 h vs 19.25 h
  • 2.31x more expensive
    RAM
    £300 GB
    Category Benchmark
    This smartwatch is more expensive than the average smartwatch (£300 vs £130).
    £300 vs £130
  • 0.08 inch smaller screen size
    Screen size
    1.32 inch
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
    This smartwatch has a smaller screen size than the average smartwatch (1.3 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch screen is 1.40 inch.
    1.32 inch vs 1.40 inch
  • 5 g heavier weight
    Weight
    50.0 g
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is heavier than the average smartwatch (50 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    Weight refers to watch case without strap/band.
    50.0 g vs 45.0 g
  • 2.31x more expensive
    RAM
    £300 GB
    Category Benchmark
    This smartwatch is more expensive than the average smartwatch (£300 vs £130).
    £300 vs £130
  • 12.5 h shorter GPS battery life
    Battery life with GPS on
    7.5 h
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
    Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
    This smartwatch lasts less with GPS on than the average smartwatch (7.5 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h.
    8 (in training mode.
    7.5 h vs 20 h
  • 11.25 h shorter training battery life
    Battery life in training mode
    8 h
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
    This smartwatch lasts less in training mode than the average smartwatch (8 h vs 19.25 h). The average smartwatch lasts 19.25 h.
    6-hour gps tracking, but no dedicated training mode.
    8 h vs 19.25 h
  • 0.08 inch smaller screen size
    Screen size
    1.32 inch
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
    This smartwatch has a smaller screen size than the average smartwatch (1.3 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch screen is 1.40 inch.
    1.32 inch vs 1.40 inch
  • 5 g heavier weight
    Weight
    50.0 g
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is heavier than the average smartwatch (50 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    Weight refers to watch case without strap/band.
    50.0 g vs 45.0 g

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

6.0
Thao Huynh
≈ estimated
02/08/2022
Hands-on review · design, battery and software tests
Verdict
Huawei Watch GT 3 Pro Ceramic has a beautiful ceramic design and great battery life, but its software needs much more polish for the price.
9.0
Bench House
≈ estimated
16/06/2022
Hands-on review · battery, health and fitness tests
Verdict
Huawei Watch GT 3 Pro Ceramic is a very good smartwatch in both titanium and ceramic versions, with mature software and strong health tracking.
8.0
PACE MAX PRO
≈ estimated
06/06/2022
Hands-on review · ceramic build, features and price
Verdict
Huawei Watch GT 3 Pro Ceramic is pricey and heavy, but a very good pick for buyers who want ceramic, with good battery life and screen.
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

What reviewers agree on

Based on 10 · 12

Reviewers praise the long battery life, elegant ceramic build and reliable health tracking, but the app and watch face selection disappoints.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.0
techradar.com
✓ explicit
14/08/2022
Month-long test · Battery and design
Verdict
The Huawei Watch GT 3 Pro suits buyers who want a classic-looking watch with very long battery life, but a weak app store and a non-working Wallet hold it back.
8.5
phonearena.com
✓ explicit
02/11/2022
Hands-on review · Sport and health
Verdict
The Huawei Watch GT 3 Pro is a strong pick for runners and hikers who want fast GPS and accurate health tracking, but it's not a full smartwatch.
zdnet.com
18/05/2022
Not graded yet
techadvisor.com
22/06/2022
Not graded yet
pocket-lint.com
14/06/2022
Not graded yet
8.0
expertreviews.co.uk
✓ explicit
30/11/2022
Hands-on review · Fitness accuracy
Verdict
The Huawei Watch GT 3 Pro is stylish with accurate fitness tracking and long battery life, but restrictive software and slow GPS locks mean it's not an easy recommendation.
vulcanpost.com
08/06/2022
Not graded yet
cgmagonline.com
14/07/2022
Not graded yet
digitec.ch
30/01/2023
Not graded yet
xda-developers.com
31/05/2022
Not graded yet
9.0
digitalcitizen.life
✓ explicit
05/10/2022
Hands-on test · Fitness watch
Verdict
The Huawei Watch GT 3 Pro is more of a fitness device than a smartwatch, with excellent health tracking and battery life, but Huawei's app ecosystem limits its smart features.
8.0
irishtimes.com
✓ explicit
11/08/2022
Hands-on test · Android vs iPhone
Verdict
The Huawei Watch GT 3 Pro Ceramic is a light, great-looking watch best suited to Android users, since iPhone owners miss out on app installs and music transfers.
9.0
buro247.my
≈ estimated
19/07/2022
Month-long test · Fitness watch
Verdict
The Huawei Watch GT 3 Pro Ceramic looks sleek and lasts up to a week, so it suits the gym, pool and office, though iPhone users get fewer features.
8.0
abstylemagazine.it
≈ estimated
25/04/2023
Long-term test · Ceramic design
Verdict
The Huawei Watch GT 3 Pro Ceramic is a stylish watch with a scratch-resistant sapphire screen and nearly a week of battery, but notifications and apps let it down.
tg24.sky.it
14/07/2022
Not graded yet
tomshw.it
18/05/2022
Not graded yet
5.0
digitec.ch
≈ estimated
30/01/2023
Hands-on test · Battery and sleep
Verdict
The Huawei Watch GT 3 Pro is powerful, bright and long-lasting, but with no eSIM and few popular apps, it suits buyers who want a fitness-first watch.

Third-party reviews

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Huawei Watch GT 3 Pro Ceramic

  • Elegant, jewelry-like design with white nanocrystalline ceramic and gold accents
  • Highly scratch-resistant sapphire glass and durable ceramic body
  • Exceptional battery life, lasting up to 7 days with typical use
  • Vibrant and sharp 1.32-inch AMOLED display with high pixel density
  • Comprehensive health tracking including ECG, SpO2, and skin temperature monitoring
  • Advanced water resistance suitable for free diving up to 30 metres
  • Fast wireless charging compatible with standard Qi chargers

What we don't like about Huawei Watch GT 3 Pro Ceramic

  • Limited third-party app ecosystem compared to Apple or Google platforms
  • Reduced functionality when paired with iOS, such as lack of music imports
  • Notification interaction is restricted to quick replies on some platforms
  • Adjusting the ceramic link strap is fiddly and requires a tiny screwdriver
  • Missing common features like mobile payments (NFC) in many regions
  • Notably more expensive than the standard GT 3 or the Titanium Pro model
  • Heavier feel on the wrist, which some users find bulky for intensive sports

Verdict

The Huawei Watch GT 3 Pro Ceramic is a premium 43mm smartwatch featuring a nanocrystalline ceramic case, a sapphire crystal glass face, and a 1.32-inch AMOLED display with a sharp 466 x 466 resolution. Its core characteristics include advanced TruSeen 5.0+ heart rate monitoring, SpO2 tracking, ECG analysis, skin temperature sensing, and over 100 workout modes, including specialized modes for free diving up to 30 meters and golf. Main pros include its luxurious scratch-resistant build, exceptional battery life of up to 7 days, and broad compatibility with both Android and iOS devices. However, notable cons include limited third-party app support via the AppGallery, the lack of built-in Wi-Fi or cellular connectivity, and its relatively high price point compared to the standard model.

Compare Huawei Watch GT 3 Pro Ceramic with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Huawei Watch GT 3 Pro Ceramic and other Smartwatches

No results found