OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Smartwatches Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 3,488 independent expert reviews and 5,192 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v2.0

Amazfit Balance 2 Review | 126 Data compared

Avg. price:~£260Screen size:1.50 inchBattery life:21 daysDisplay type:AMOLED

Amazfit Balance 2 Review: Compare 126 technical specifications and 21 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

8.6

Overall score

Score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartwatch's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartwatches on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 99% of models
Score components

70%

8.7

Technical score

30%

8.5

Review score ( 9 · 12)

Review score 30% · 8.5 · based on 21 independent reviews
Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 30%, technical score 70%. This model has enough reviews, so its review score is the weighted average of their grades. 16 more reviews are not scored yet.
★Better than 99% of smartwatches
8.7

Technical score

Technical score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 99% of models
Score components

24%

8.7

Health

21%

10

Fitness

16%

8.3

Battery

14%

7.4

Smart features

12%

8.2

Connectivity

9%

9.0

Display & Design

4%

8.3

Hardware

★Better than 99% of smartwatches
8.5

Review score

Review score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 91% of models
Grades by review (21)
9 reviews: 4 with a printed score, 5 estimated from the review. 12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 5
✓ explicit
3

8.3%

8.0

techradar.com

6.7%

8.5

gearbrain.com

6.7%

8.2

the5krunner.com

≈ estimated
2

6.7%

9.0

wareable.com

6.7%

9.0

wearablexp.com

Video reviews 3

3.3%

9.0

It's Matt B

3.3%

9.0

German Accent Reviews

3.3%

8.0

The Quantified Scientist

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
★Better than 91% of smartwatches
  • No image
No image

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Amazfit Balance 2

Technical score
Technical score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 99% of models
Score components:

24%

8.7

Health

21%

10

Fitness

16%

8.3

Battery

14%

7.4

Smart features

12%

8.2

Connectivity

9%

9.0

Display & Design

4%

8.3

Hardware

8.7
Review score
Review score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 91% of models
Grades by review (21)
9 reviews: 4 with a printed score, 5 estimated from the review. 12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 5
✓ explicit
3

8.3%

8.0

techradar.com

6.7%

8.5

gearbrain.com

6.7%

8.2

the5krunner.com

≈ estimated
2

6.7%

9.0

wareable.com

6.7%

9.0

wearablexp.com

Video reviews 3

3.3%

9.0

It's Matt B

3.3%

9.0

German Accent Reviews

3.3%

8.0

The Quantified Scientist

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
8.5
Popularity
Popularity
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartwatch.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 73% of models
Popularity:
Amazfit Balance 2 has a popularity of 8.2 points, which is higher than 72.6% of smartwatches.
8.2
Value for money
Value for money
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 98% of models
Score components:

60%

8.6

Overall score

40%

9.2

Price

8.8
Brand name
Amazfit
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
▲ Better than 11% of models
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 10.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
▲ Better than 33% of models
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 33.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
ECG
no
▼ Worse than 17% of models
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
▲ Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings. 51.9% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
Supports abnormal high/low heart-rate alerts (typically after inactivity).
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
Accelerometer
yes
▲ Better than 1% of models
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.6% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
yes
Barometer
yes
▲ Better than 51% of models
This smartwatch includes a barometer. 50.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
Gyroscope
yes
▲ Better than 30% of models
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 30.2% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
yes
Cadence sensor
yes
▲ Better than 69% of models
This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor. 69% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Cadence may require external sensor/app pairing on some models.
Distance tracking
yes
Distance tracking
yes
▲ Better than 4% of models
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 4.1% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery life
21 days
Battery life
21 days
★ Better than 93% of models
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch offers a battery life of 21 days which is longer than that of 92.7% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.7% of smartwatches.
Battery life in training mode
33 h
Battery life in training mode
33 h
▲ Better than 79% of models
Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
This smartwatch lasts 33 h in training mode which is longer than 78.9% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.2% of smartwatches.
Battery life with GPS on
33 h
Battery life with GPS on
33 h
▲ Better than 79% of models
Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
This smartwatch lasts 33 h with GPS on which is longer than 78.6% of smartwatches.
Up to 67 hours in power-saving.
Battery power
658 mAh
Battery power
658 mAh
★ Better than 99% of models
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a battery capacity of 658 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 99% of smartwatches.
Charge time
120 min
Charge time
120 min
▼ Worse than 43% of models
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges in 120 min which is faster than 13.1% of smartwatches and equal to the charge time of 44.2% of smartwatches.
Approximate value from reported charging range: 120 minutes.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Zepp OS
Operating system
Zepp OS
▲ Better than 60% of models
This smartwatch runs Zepp OS which is more advanced than the operating system in 60.2% of smartwatches and the same as that in 6.5% of smartwatches.
OS detail: Zepp OS (5).
Software update frequency
regular
Software update frequency
regular
★ Better than 94% of models
This smartwatch has regular software update support which is more active than that of 94% of smartwatches and equal to that of 6% of smartwatches.
Updates are released regularly throughout the year.
Third-party app support
yes
Third-party app support
yes
▲ Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports third-party apps. 52.4% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Support is limited to official app stores/approved app selection.
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
Voice assistant support
yes
▲ Better than 32% of models
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 32.4% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
Cellular module
no
▼ Worse than 18% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 18% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
▲ Better than 44% of models
This smartwatch supports GPS. 43.9% of smartwatches support GPS.
Built-in multi-band GPS/GNSS support is available.
Galileo support
yes
Galileo support
yes
▲ Better than 62% of models
This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation. 61.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Compass
yes
Compass
yes
▲ Better than 47% of models
This smartwatch includes a compass. 47.5% of smartwatches include a compass.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen size
1.5 inch
Screen size
1.5 inch
▲ Better than 66% of models
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
This smartwatch has a screen size of 1.5 inch which is larger than the screens of 66.2% of smartwatches and equal to those of 3.3% of smartwatches.
Display type
AMOLED
Display type
AMOLED
▲ Better than 50% of models
This smartwatch uses a AMOLED display type which is more advanced than that of 49.9% of smartwatches and the same as that of 50.1% of smartwatches.
Resolution
480x 480
Resolution
480x 480
★ Better than 99% of models
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 480x480 which is higher than that of 98.5% of smartwatches and equal to that of 1.5% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
453 ppi
Pixel density
453 ppi
▲ Better than 75% of models
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 453 ppi which is higher than that of 75.3% of smartwatches and equal to that of 1.9% of smartwatches.
Display brightness
2000 nits
Display brightness
2000 nits
▲ Better than 89% of models
Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
This smartwatch reaches 2000 nits of display brightness, which is higher than that of 88.8% of smartwatches and equal to that of 5.9% of smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
?
Processor model
?
RAM
?
Internal storage
32 GB
Internal storage
32 GB
▲ Better than 85% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch uses 32 GB for internal storage which is larger than that of 84.7% of smartwatches and equal to that of 13.4% of smartwatches.
External memory slot
no
External memory slot
no
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Amazfit Balance 2 vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • More frequent updates
    Software update frequency
    regular
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    This smartwatch receives regular software updates, while the average smartwatch receives ended updates.
    Updates are released regularly throughout the year.
    regular vs ended
  • 14 days day/s longer battery life
    Battery life
    21 days
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 21 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    21 days vs 7 days
  • Blood pressure monitoring
    Blood pressure monitoring
    yes
    ▲ Better than 78% of models
    This smartwatch supports blood pressure monitoring, the average smartwatch does not. 22% of smartwatches support blood pressure monitoring.
    Measurements are for wellness guidance, not medical diagnosis.
  • Temperature sensing
    Temperature sensor
    yes
    ▲ Better than 73% of models
    This smartwatch includes a temperature sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 26.8% of smartwatches include a temperature sensor.
    Temperature readings may be skin/ambient trends, not core-body medical values.
  • Readiness score
    Readiness score
    yes
    ▲ Better than 83% of models
    This smartwatch supports readiness scores, the average smartwatch does not. 17.5% of smartwatches support readiness scores.
  • HRV tracking
    HRV tracking
    yes
    ▲ Better than 59% of models
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 40.8% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • Stronger display glass
    Display glass type
    sapphire
    ▲ Better than 82% of models
    This smartwatch uses sapphire display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    sapphire vs mineral glass
  • Maps support
    Maps support
    yes
    ▲ Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 31.5% of smartwatches support maps.
    Supports offline maps.
  • 16.9% better value for money
    Amazfit Balance 2 has a higher value-for-money score than the average smartwatch (8.79 vs 7.5).
    8.79 vs 7.52
  • Blood pressure monitoring
    Blood pressure monitoring
    yes
    ▲ Better than 78% of models
    This smartwatch supports blood pressure monitoring, the average smartwatch does not. 22% of smartwatches support blood pressure monitoring.
    Measurements are for wellness guidance, not medical diagnosis.
  • Temperature sensing
    Temperature sensor
    yes
    ▲ Better than 73% of models
    This smartwatch includes a temperature sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 26.8% of smartwatches include a temperature sensor.
    Temperature readings may be skin/ambient trends, not core-body medical values.
  • Readiness score
    Readiness score
    yes
    ▲ Better than 83% of models
    This smartwatch supports readiness scores, the average smartwatch does not. 17.5% of smartwatches support readiness scores.
  • HRV tracking
    HRV tracking
    yes
    ▲ Better than 59% of models
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 40.8% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • VO2 max measurement
    VO2 max measurement
    yes
    ▲ Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch measures VO2 max, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • Irregular heart rate alerts
    Irregular heart rate warnings
    yes
    ▲ Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does not. 48.1% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
    Supports abnormal high/low heart-rate alerts (typically after inactivity).
  • Calorie tracking
    Calorie tracking
    yes
    ▲ Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.6% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
    Food logging may require a companion or third-party app.
  • Weight tracking
    Weight tracking
    yes
    ▲ Better than 61% of models
    This smartwatch supports weight tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 39.1% of smartwatches support weight tracking.
    Weight tracking may rely on manual app entry or smart-scale sync.
  • External heart rate monitor support
    External heart rate monitor compatibility
    yes
    ▲ Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports external heart rate monitor compatibility, the average smartwatch does not. 42.7% of smartwatches support external heart rate monitor compatibility.
    Supports external monitors over Bluetooth/BLE.
  • Barometer sensor included
    Barometer
    yes
    ▲ Better than 51% of models
    This smartwatch includes a barometer, the average smartwatch does not. 49.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • Cadence tracking
    Cadence sensor
    yes
    ▲ Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 31.1% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
    Cadence may require external sensor/app pairing on some models.
  • 90 more exercise profiles
    Multi-sport mode
    170
    ▲ Better than 32% of models
    This smartwatch supports more exercise modes than the average smartwatch (170 vs 80). The average smartwatch supports 80 exercise modes.
    Reported as at least 170 exercise modes.
    170 vs 80
  • Route support
    Route support
    yes
    ▲ Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch supports route support, the average smartwatch does not. 50% of smartwatches support route support.
    Route support available via companion app.
  • 14 days day/s longer battery life
    Battery life
    21 days
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 21 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    21 days vs 7 days
  • 13 h longer GPS battery life
    Battery life with GPS on
    33 h
    ▲ Better than 79% of models
    Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
    This smartwatch lasts longer with GPS on than the average smartwatch (33 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h.
    Up to 67 hours in power-saving.
    33 h vs 20 h
  • 13.75 h longer training battery life
    Battery life in training mode
    33 h
    ▲ Better than 79% of models
    Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
    This smartwatch lasts longer in training mode than the average smartwatch (33 h vs 19.25 h). The average smartwatch lasts 19.25 h.
    33 h vs 19.25 h
  • 358 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery life
    658 mAh days
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch has a larger battery capacity than the average smartwatch (658 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    658 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • Maps support
    Maps support
    yes
    ▲ Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 31.5% of smartwatches support maps.
    Supports offline maps.
  • NFC functionality
    NFC
    yes
    ▲ Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 43.4% of smartwatches support NFC.
    NFC hardware is present, but functionality may be limited by region/app support.
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    Wi-Fi support
    yes
    ▲ Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.3% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • Galileo satellite support
    Galileo support
    yes
    ▲ Better than 62% of models
    This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation, the average smartwatch does not. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.2
    ▲ Better than 73% of models
    This smartwatch supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average smartwatch (5.2 vs 5). The average smartwatch uses 5.0.
    5.2 vs 5.0
  • Stronger display glass
    Display glass type
    sapphire
    ▲ Better than 82% of models
    This smartwatch uses sapphire display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    sapphire vs mineral glass
  • 1,400 nits higher display brightness
    Display brightness
    2000 nits
    ▲ Better than 89% of models
    Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
    This smartwatch has higher display brightness than the average smartwatch (2000 nits vs 600 nits). The average smartwatch reaches 600 nits.
    2,000 nits vs 600 nits
  • Rugged construction
    Rugged design
    yes
    ▲ Better than 62% of models
    This smartwatch has a rugged design, the average smartwatch does not. 37.9% of smartwatches have a rugged design.
    Rugged design supported by MIL-STD/military-grade durability claim.
  • 50 m deeper water resistance
    Waterproof depth rating
    100 m
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    Market range: <1 m – >50 m
    This smartwatch has a deeper waterproof rating than the average smartwatch (100 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch reaches 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    100 m vs 50 m
  • Higher resolution
    Display type
    480 x 480
    ▲ Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 480x480, while the average smartwatch reaches 352x430.
    480x480 vs 352x430
  • 127 ppi higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    453 ppi
    ▲ Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
    This smartwatch has a higher pixel density than the average smartwatch (453 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch display reaches 326 ppi.
    453 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • 0.1 inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    1.50 inch
    ▲ Better than 66% of models
    Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
    This smartwatch has a larger screen size than the average smartwatch (1.5 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch screen is 1.40 inch.
    1.50 inch vs 1.40 inch
  • Better case material
    Case material
    aluminum, fiber-reinforced polymer
    ▲ Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch uses aluminum, fiber-reinforced polymer for the case material, while the average smartwatch uses polycarbonate.
    aluminum, fiber-reinforced polymer vs polycarbonate
  • More frequent updates
    Software update frequency
    regular
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    This smartwatch receives regular software updates, while the average smartwatch receives ended updates.
    Updates are released regularly throughout the year.
    regular vs ended
  • Third-party app support
    Third-party app support
    yes
    ▲ Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports third-party apps, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
    Support is limited to official app stores/approved app selection.
  • More advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Zepp OS
    ▲ Better than 60% of models
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Zepp OS vs Proprietary OS).
    OS detail: Zepp OS (5).
    Zepp OS vs Proprietary OS
  • 28 GB more storage
    Internal storage
    32 GB
    ▲ Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
    This smartwatch offers more internal storage than the average smartwatch (32 GB vs 4 GB). The average smartwatch provides 4 GB of storage.
    32 GB vs 4 GB
  • 4 year/s newer release date
    Release date
    2025
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This smartwatch has a newer release date than the average smartwatch (2025 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    June 2025
    2025 vs 2021
  • No smart alarm
    Smart alarm
    no
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 52.7% of smartwatches support smart alarms.
  • 2x more expensive
    Amazfit Balance 2 is more expensive than the average smartwatch (£260 vs £130).
    £260 vs £130
  • 0.7 mm thicker watch body
    Thickness
    12.30 mm
    ▼ Worse than 68% of models
    Market range: <9.8 mm – >14.1 mm
    This smartwatch is thicker than the average smartwatch (12.3 mm vs 11.6 mm). The average smartwatch thickness is 11.6 mm.
    12.30 mm vs 11.6 mm
  • 5.4 mm wider watch width
    Width
    47.4 mm
    ▼ Worse than 94% of models
    Market range: <34.6 mm – >46.8 mm
    This smartwatch is wider than the average smartwatch (47.4 mm vs 42 mm). The average smartwatch width is 42.0 mm.
    47.4 mm vs 42.0 mm
  • 2.4 mm taller watch height
    Height
    47.4 mm
    ▼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <39.5 mm – >51 mm
    This smartwatch is taller than the average smartwatch (47.4 mm vs 45 mm). The average smartwatch height is 45 mm.
    47.4 mm vs 45 mm
  • 2x more expensive
    Amazfit Balance 2 is more expensive than the average smartwatch (£260 vs £130).
    £260 vs £130
  • 0.7 mm thicker watch body
    Thickness
    12.30 mm
    ▼ Worse than 68% of models
    Market range: <9.8 mm – >14.1 mm
    This smartwatch is thicker than the average smartwatch (12.3 mm vs 11.6 mm). The average smartwatch thickness is 11.6 mm.
    12.30 mm vs 11.6 mm
  • 5.4 mm wider watch width
    Width
    47.4 mm
    ▼ Worse than 94% of models
    Market range: <34.6 mm – >46.8 mm
    This smartwatch is wider than the average smartwatch (47.4 mm vs 42 mm). The average smartwatch width is 42.0 mm.
    47.4 mm vs 42.0 mm
  • 2.4 mm taller watch height
    Height
    47.4 mm
    ▼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <39.5 mm – >51 mm
    This smartwatch is taller than the average smartwatch (47.4 mm vs 45 mm). The average smartwatch height is 45 mm.
    47.4 mm vs 45 mm
  • No smart alarm
    Smart alarm
    no
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 52.7% of smartwatches support smart alarms.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
It's Matt B
≈ estimated
31/12/2025
Hands-on review · heart rate tests against rival watches
Verdict
Amazfit Balance 2 is hard to beat for the price, with only minor gaps, though heart rate readings sometimes run high.
8.0
The Quantified Scientist
≈ estimated
16/08/2025
Data-driven review · heart rate, sleep and GPS tests
Verdict
Amazfit Balance 2 is recommended for many users, though sleep stage tracking and sunlight readability are weaker points.
9.0
German Accent Reviews
≈ estimated
08/07/2025
Full review · fitness, GPS, heart rate and battery tests
Verdict
Amazfit Balance 2 offers strong value for the price as a hybrid sports and smartwatch, though it lacks ECG.
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

What reviewers agree on

Based on 11 · 12

Reviewers love the tough design, long battery life and accurate GPS, but apps, workout features, notifications and heart-rate tracking let it down.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.0
techradar.com
✓ explicit
18/02/2026
Hands-on review · Battery and build
Verdict
The Amazfit Balance 2 is a sturdy sports watch that lasts about three weeks on typical use, but its maps load slowly and it has no cellular option.
9.0
wareable.com
≈ estimated
20/01/2026
Field test · Fitness tracking
Verdict
The Amazfit Balance 2 is a dependable fitness watch with accurate heart rate, GPS and strong battery life, but few smart features.
8.5
Gearbrain
✓ explicit
26/01/2026
Real-world review · Multisport training
Verdict
The Amazfit Balance 2 is a training-focused watch that lasts about two weeks per charge, with automatic strength tracking and golf maps, but few smart features.
8.2
the5krunner.com
✓ explicit
05/12/2025
Long-term test · Sports and health
Verdict
The Amazfit Balance 2 is a stylish, long-lasting sports watch that suits casual training, though GPS is not top-tier and REM sleep data is unreliable.
livemint.com
29/10/2025
Not graded yet
trustedreviews.com
11/09/2025
Not graded yet
thehindu.com
08/09/2025
Not graded yet
thegamerwithkids.com
30/06/2025
Not graded yet
androidcentral.com
30/06/2025
Not graded yet
tomsguide.com
24/06/2025
Not graded yet
golfmonthly.com
08/09/2025
Not graded yet
220triathlon.com
22/10/2025
Not graded yet
8.0
montre-cardio-gps.fr
≈ estimated
27/02/2026
Hands-on test · Outdoor and HYROX
Verdict
The Amazfit Balance 2 is a large, bright, rugged sports watch with maps and a HYROX mode, but its voice commands and GPS-only accuracy are weaker.
journaldugeek.com
31/10/2025
Not graded yet
frandroid.com
23/09/2025
Not graded yet
lesnumeriques.com
25/06/2025
Not graded yet
8.0
tweakers.net
≈ estimated
16/02/2026
Long-term test · Battery and GPS
Verdict
The Amazfit Balance 2 is a well-built sports watch that lasts over two weeks and has good GPS, but offers fewer apps and weaker payment and music support.

Third-party reviews

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Amazfit Balance 2

  • Exceptional battery life, often lasting 2–3 weeks on a single charge.
  • Premium design with high-quality materials like sapphire glass and an aluminium alloy frame.
  • Excellent value for the price, offering high-end features like offline maps and 10 ATM water resistance for under $300.
  • Comprehensive sports tracking with over 170 modes, including specialised HYROX and golf features.
  • Bright and sharp 1.5-inch AMOLED display with up to 2,000 nits peak brightness.
  • Comfortable for all-day and overnight wear due to its lightweight construction.

What we don't like about Amazfit Balance 2

  • Limited third-party app ecosystem compared to Apple Watch or Wear OS devices.
  • Occasional inaccuracies in heart rate monitoring during high-intensity or erratic movements.
  • Software experience can feel unpolished, with clunky map loading and complex app navigation.
  • Inconsistent sleep tracking, specifically regarding REM stages or detecting wake times.
  • Missing some basic smartwatch functionality, such as the ability to reply to notifications on iOS.
  • Requirement to pre-download maps and golf courses before use can be inconvenient.

Verdict

The Amazfit Balance 2 is a high-performance 47mm smartwatch featuring a vibrant 1.5-inch AMOLED display (480x480 resolution) protected by scratch-resistant sapphire crystal and peak brightness up to 2,000 nits. Encased in a durable aluminum alloy frame, it offers industry-leading 10 ATM water resistance with professional-grade diving support up to 45 meters and advanced sports tracking for over 170 modes, including official HYROX and golf course mapping. Key hardware includes a 658mAh battery providing up to 21 days of typical usage, dual-band GPS across six satellite systems, 32GB of internal storage for offline maps and music, and the BioTracker 6.0 sensor for continuous 24/7 heart rate, SpO2, and HRV recovery monitoring. Major pros include its exceptional battery life, premium build quality, and precise outdoor tracking; however, common cons include limited third-party app support within Zepp OS, occasional lag when rendering high-resolution maps, and the lack of advanced medical features like ECG or blood pressure monitoring.

Compare Amazfit Balance 2 with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Amazfit Balance 2 and other Smartwatches

No results found