OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartwatches Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v3.0

Mobvoi TicWatch Pro S review: 127 specs compared

Avg. price:~£230Screen size:1.39 inchBattery life:3.5 daysDisplay type:AMOLED

Mobvoi TicWatch Pro S Review: Compare 127 technical specifications and 9 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

Mobvoi TicWatch Pro S
7.0/10

Overall score

Score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 52% of models
Score components

35%

6.8

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

6.8

Reviews score

10%

?

Sentiment scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 6.8, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–²Better than 52% of smartwatches
7.7

Value for money

Value for money
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
Score components

70%

7.0

Overall score

30%

9.3

Price

â–¼Worse than 56%
6.8

Technical score

Technical score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 60% of models
Score components

24%

6.1

Health

21%

8.8

Fitness

16%

4.8

Battery

14%

6.5

Smart features

12%

8.1

Connectivity

9%

7.0

Display & Design

4%

5.7

Hardware

â–²Better than 60%
6.8

Reviews score

Reviews score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 60% of models

6.8

Mark 7.7 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

7.8

Average grade

20%

7.2

Popularity

Grades by review (9)
4 reviews + 5 videos, average 7.7/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 60%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • mobvoi-ticwatch-pro-s
  • mobvoi-ticwatch-pro-s
  • mobvoi-ticwatch-pro-s
  • mobvoi-ticwatch-pro-s
  • mobvoi-ticwatch-pro-s
  • mobvoi-ticwatch-pro-s
mobvoi-ticwatch-pro-s
mobvoi-ticwatch-pro-s
mobvoi-ticwatch-pro-s
mobvoi-ticwatch-pro-s
mobvoi-ticwatch-pro-s
mobvoi-ticwatch-pro-s
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the Mobvoi TicWatch Pro S

Based on 4 · 5

Reviewers like the sharp display and solid design, but say it feels sluggish and are split on battery life.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Mobvoi TicWatch Pro S

Technical score
Technical score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 60% of models
Score components:

24%

6.1

Health

21%

8.8

Fitness

16%

4.8

Battery

14%

6.5

Smart features

12%

8.1

Connectivity

9%

7.0

Display & Design

4%

5.7

Hardware

6.8
Reviews score
6.8
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
Score components:

70%

7.0

Overall score

30%

9.3

Price

7.7
Heart rate monitor
yes
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 9.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 30.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 18.2% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings. 50.6% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
HRV tracking
no
This smartwatch does not support HRV tracking. 45.2% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.5% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
yes
This smartwatch includes a barometer. 46.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 28.9% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
no
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 32.9% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 3.7% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
Battery life
3.5 days
Market range: <1 day – >20 days
This smartwatch lasts 3.5 days on a charge, which is shorter than 75.5% of Smartwatches and the same as 1% of Smartwatches.
Used the typical 2-5 day Smart Mode range; ignored 30-day Essential Mode.
Battery life in training mode
9.5 h
Market range: <6 h – >48 h
This smartwatch records workouts for 9.5 h on a charge, which is shorter than 73.2% of Smartwatches and the same as 0.5% of Smartwatches.
Battery life with GPS on
9 h
Market range: <6 h – >46 h
This smartwatch lasts 9 h with GPS on, which is shorter than 80.9% of Smartwatches and the same as 0.8% of Smartwatches.
Battery power
415 mAh
Market range: <200 mAh – >500 mAh
This smartwatch has a 415 mAh battery, which is larger than 74.7% of Smartwatches and the same as 0.4% of Smartwatches.
Charge time
90 min
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges from empty in 90 min, which is quicker than 64.4% of Smartwatches and the same as 9.9% of Smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Wear OS
This smartwatch runs Wear OS, which is more advanced than the system in 80.1% of Smartwatches and equal to 15.8% of Smartwatches.
Software update frequency
ended
This smartwatch has ended software update support which is less active than that of 46.1% of smartwatches and equal to that of 53.9% of smartwatches.
Third-party app support
yes
This smartwatch supports third-party apps. 48.5% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 30.8% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
Cellular module
no
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 16.7% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
yes
This smartwatch supports GPS. 40.3% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
?
Dual-frequency GPS
no
This smartwatch does not support dual-frequency GPS. 15.1% of Smartwatches offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen size
1.39 inch
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.83 inch
This smartwatch has a 1.39 inch screen, which is smaller than 51.3% of Smartwatches and the same as 9% of Smartwatches.
Display type
AMOLED
This smartwatch uses AMOLED, which is more advanced than the screen in 46.9% of Smartwatches and equal to 53.1% of Smartwatches.
Resolution
400x 400
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 400x400 which is higher than that of 65.3% of smartwatches and equal to that of 2.5% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
407 ppi
Market range: <213 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 407 ppi, which is higher than 70.4% of Smartwatches and equal to 1.6% of Smartwatches.
Display brightness
500 nits
Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
This smartwatch has a screen brightness of 500 nits, which is lower than 73.2% of Smartwatches and equal to 13.6% of Smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
?
Processor model
Snapdragon Wear 2100
This smartwatch uses the Snapdragon Wear 2100 processor model.
RAM
1 GB
Market range: <0.5 GB – >2 GB
This smartwatch has 1 GB of RAM, which is more than 34.1% of Smartwatches and equal to 41.8% of Smartwatches.
Internal storage
4 GB
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch has 4 GB of internal storage, which is more than 39.8% of Smartwatches and equal to 25.5% of Smartwatches.
External memory slot
no
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more
What reviewers say

Mobvoi TicWatch Pro S vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • Temperature sensing
    This smartwatch includes a temperature sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 31.9% of smartwatches include a temperature sensor.
    Availability may vary by model or region.
  • More advanced operating system
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Wear OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Wear OS vs Proprietary OS
  • Maps support
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 34.4% of smartwatches support maps.
    Maps via Google Maps app.
  • Supports wireless charging
    This smartwatch supports wireless charging, the average smartwatch does not. 23.4% of smartwatches support wireless charging.
  • NFC functionality
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 45.2% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • 30 min quicker charging
    This smartwatch charges faster than the average smartwatch (90 min vs 120 min). The average smartwatch takes 120 min to charge from empty.
    90 min vs 120 min
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.5% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • Supports ANT+
    This smartwatch supports ANT+, the average smartwatch does not. 13% of smartwatches support ANT+.
  • Temperature sensing
    This smartwatch includes a temperature sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 31.9% of smartwatches include a temperature sensor.
    Availability may vary by model or region.
  • Calorie tracking
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.7% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
  • Weight tracking
    This smartwatch supports weight tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 41.9% of smartwatches support weight tracking.
  • Supports wireless charging
    This smartwatch supports wireless charging, the average smartwatch does not. 23.4% of smartwatches support wireless charging.
  • 30 min quicker charging
    This smartwatch charges faster than the average smartwatch (90 min vs 120 min). The average smartwatch takes 120 min to charge from empty.
    90 min vs 120 min
  • 110 mAh larger battery capacity
    This smartwatch has a larger battery than the average smartwatch (415 mAh vs 305 mAh). The average smartwatch has a 305 mAh battery.
    415 mAh vs 305 mAh
  • Maps support
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 34.4% of smartwatches support maps.
    Maps via Google Maps app.
  • NFC functionality
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 45.2% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.5% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • Supports ANT+
    This smartwatch supports ANT+, the average smartwatch does not. 13% of smartwatches support ANT+.
  • Stronger display glass
    This smartwatch uses Corning Gorilla Glass 3 display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 3 vs mineral glass
  • Rugged construction
    This smartwatch has a rugged design, the average smartwatch does not. 41.2% of smartwatches have a rugged design.
    Rugged design supported by MIL-STD/military-grade durability claim.
  • Better case material
    This smartwatch uses aluminum, stainless steel, fiber-reinforced polymer for the case material, while the average smartwatch uses polycarbonate.
    aluminum, stainless steel, fiber-reinforced polymer vs polycarbonate
  • 81 ppi sharper screen
    This smartwatch has a sharper screen than the average smartwatch (407 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch has a pixel density of 326 ppi.
    407 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • Better band material
    This smartwatch uses silicone, leather for the band material, while the average smartwatch uses silicone.
    silicone, leather vs silicone
  • More advanced operating system
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Wear OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Wear OS vs Proprietary OS
  • No irregular heart rate alerts
    This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does. 50.6% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • No multi-sport mode
    This smartwatch does not include a multi-sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 71.7% of smartwatches include a multi-sport mode.
  • 48.5 m shallower water rating
    This smartwatch is rated for shallower water than the average smartwatch (1.5 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch is rated to 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1.5 m vs 50 m
  • 12 h shorter GPS battery life
    This smartwatch lasts less time with GPS on than the average smartwatch (9 h vs 21 h). The average smartwatch lasts 21 h with GPS on.
    9 h vs 21 h
  • No cycle tracking
    This smartwatch does not support menstrual cycle tracking, the average smartwatch does. 66.8% of smartwatches support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • No call answering
    This smartwatch does not support call answering, the average smartwatch does. 60% of smartwatches support call answering.
  • 10.5 h shorter training battery life
    This smartwatch lasts less time in training mode than the average smartwatch (9.5 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h in training mode.
    9.5 h vs 20 h
  • 3.5 days shorter battery life
    This smartwatch runs for less time per charge than the average smartwatch (3.5 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    Used the typical 2-5 day Smart Mode range; ignored 30-day Essential Mode.
    3.5 days vs 7 days
  • 2.09x more expensive
    Mobvoi TicWatch Pro S is more expensive than the average smartwatch (£230 vs £110).
    £230 vs £110
  • 2.9% lower review score
    Reviews score
    6.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 60% of models

    6.8

    Mark 7.7 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.8

    Average grade

    20%

    7.2

    Popularity

    Grades by review (9)
    4 reviews + 5 videos, average 7.7/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    6.8 vs 7.0
  • No irregular heart rate alerts
    This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does. 50.6% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • No cycle tracking
    This smartwatch does not support menstrual cycle tracking, the average smartwatch does. 66.8% of smartwatches support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • No multi-sport mode
    This smartwatch does not include a multi-sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 71.7% of smartwatches include a multi-sport mode.
  • 12 h shorter GPS battery life
    This smartwatch lasts less time with GPS on than the average smartwatch (9 h vs 21 h). The average smartwatch lasts 21 h with GPS on.
    9 h vs 21 h
  • 10.5 h shorter training battery life
    This smartwatch lasts less time in training mode than the average smartwatch (9.5 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h in training mode.
    9.5 h vs 20 h
  • 3.5 days shorter battery life
    This smartwatch runs for less time per charge than the average smartwatch (3.5 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    Used the typical 2-5 day Smart Mode range; ignored 30-day Essential Mode.
    3.5 days vs 7 days
  • Less current Bluetooth version
    This smartwatch uses a less current Bluetooth version than the average smartwatch (4.2 vs 5).
    4.2 vs 5
  • 48.5 m shallower water rating
    This smartwatch is rated for shallower water than the average smartwatch (1.5 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch is rated to 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1.5 m vs 50 m
  • 250 nits dimmer screen
    This smartwatch has a dimmer screen than the average smartwatch (500 nits vs 750 nits). The average smartwatch peaks at 750 nits.
    500 nits vs 750 nits
  • 13.5 g heavier
    This smartwatch is heavier than the average smartwatch (58.5 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45 g.
    Weight refers to watch case without strap/band.
    58.5 g vs 45 g
  • 0.9 mm thicker
    This smartwatch is thicker than the average smartwatch (12.6 mm vs 11.7 mm). The average smartwatch is 11.7 mm thick.
    Some sources mention variant-dependent thickness values.
    12.6 mm vs 11.7 mm
  • 10 °C lower heat tolerance
    This smartwatch tolerates a lower temperature than the average smartwatch (35 °C vs 45 °C). The average smartwatch is rated up to 45 °C.
    35 °C vs 45 °C
  • 0.01 inch smaller display
    This smartwatch has a smaller screen than the average smartwatch (1.4 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch has a 1.4 inch screen.
    1.39 inch vs 1.4 inch
  • No call answering
    This smartwatch does not support call answering, the average smartwatch does. 60% of smartwatches support call answering.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Geekanoids
≈ estimated
07/05/2021
Hands-on review · design, screen and app tests
Verdict
Mobvoi TicWatch Pro S is comfortable and responsive with fair pricing; a good pick, though iPhone owners get fewer features.
7.0
Review Detective
≈ estimated
21/06/2021
Short hands-on review · materials, battery and performance
Verdict
Mobvoi TicWatch Pro S is an enjoyable, solidly built watch, but battery life and performance hold it back, so wait for a discount.
Not graded

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

6.0
techradar.com
✓ explicit
21/04/2021
Quick review · Wear OS watch
Verdict
The Mobvoi TicWatch Pro S is an average Wear OS watch, held back by an older chip and inconsistent heart-rate accuracy, and best suited to casual fitness users.
7.0
the-gadgeteer.com
≈ estimated
17/05/2021
Hands-on review · Fitness smartwatch
Verdict
The Mobvoi TicWatch Pro S is a durable fitness watch with two days of battery life and good GPS, but it is bulky and lacks wireless charging.
6.0
androidcentral.com
✓ explicit
20/04/2021
Review · Comparison with Pro 2020
Verdict
The Mobvoi TicWatch Pro S adds updated workout and sleep apps but keeps the older processor, so the TicWatch Pro 3 is the better choice.
7.9
smartworld.it
✓ explicit
30/05/2023
Video review · Dual-screen watch
Verdict
The Mobvoi TicWatch Pro S is a solid Wear OS sports watch whose always-on LCD gives about two days of battery life, though it is bulky.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Mobvoi TicWatch Pro S

  • Innovative dual-layer display (AMOLED + FSTN) improves sunlight legibility and power saving.
  • Essential Mode significantly extends battery life up to 30 days for basic watch functions.
  • Premium build quality featuring a stainless steel bezel and a comfortable hybrid leather/silicone strap.
  • Comprehensive fitness suite including VO2 Max, TicSleep 2.0, and heart rate monitoring.
  • NFC support allows for contactless payments via Google Pay.
  • IP68 water resistance and MIL-STD-810G durability make it suitable for swimming and harsh environments.

What customers don't like about Mobvoi TicWatch Pro S

  • Uses an outdated Snapdragon Wear 2100 chipset, which can lead to sluggish performance and lag.
  • Full 'Smart Mode' battery life is relatively short, often requiring charging every 1-2 days.
  • Heart rate and GPS accuracy can be inconsistent during high-intensity workouts compared to dedicated fitness trackers.
  • Large, chunky 45mm design may be too bulky for users with smaller wrists.
  • Lacks the more advanced Snapdragon Wear 4100 found in the newer TicWatch Pro 3.
  • Proprietary magnetic charging dock is considered 'old school' compared to modern wireless charging.

Verdict

The Mobvoi TicWatch Pro S is a rugged Wear OS smartwatch featuring a signature 1.39-inch dual-layer display (AMOLED + FSTN LCD) and a 45mm carbon fiber-reinforced case. Key specifications include the Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 2100 chipset, 1GB of RAM, 4GB of storage, and a 415mAh battery providing 2–5 days of life in 'Smart Mode' or up to 30 days in 'Essential Mode.' Its primary strengths are its military-grade durability (MIL-STD-810G), IP68 water resistance suitable for swimming, and built-in sensors for GPS, NFC payments, and VO2 Max tracking. However, it is held back by its outdated processor, limited internal storage for apps, and a bulky design that may feel clunky on smaller wrists.

Compare Mobvoi TicWatch Pro S with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Mobvoi TicWatch Pro S and other Smartwatches

No results found