OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartwatches Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v3.0

Honor Watch 5 Ultra review: 127 specs compared

Avg. price:~£250Screen size:1.50 inchBattery life:15 daysDisplay type:AMOLED

Honor Watch 5 Ultra Review: Compare 127 technical specifications and 16 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

Honor Watch 5 Ultra
7.8/10

Overall score

Score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 75% of models
Score components

35%

8.3

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

7.7

Reviews score

10%

?

Sentiment scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 6.8, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–²Better than 75% of smartwatches
8.2

Value for money

Value for money
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 71% of models
Score components

70%

7.8

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

â–²Better than 71%
8.3

Technical score

Technical score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 92% of models
Score components

24%

8.4

Health

21%

9.8

Fitness

16%

8.8

Battery

14%

6.9

Smart features

12%

7.1

Connectivity

9%

8.8

Display & Design

4%

6.4

Hardware

★Better than 92%
7.7

Reviews score

Reviews score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models

80%

7.7

Average grade

20%

7.8

Popularity

Grades by review (16)
13 reviews + 3 videos, average 7.6/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 53%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • honor-watch-5-ultra
honor-watch-5-ultra
Where to buy
    N/A~ £250
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the Honor Watch 5 Ultra

Based on 10 · 3

Reviewers love the premium design and reliable health tracking, but the limited apps and lack of message replies disappoint.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Honor Watch 5 Ultra

Technical score
Technical score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 92% of models
Score components:

24%

8.4

Health

21%

9.8

Fitness

16%

8.8

Battery

14%

6.9

Smart features

12%

7.1

Connectivity

9%

8.8

Display & Design

4%

6.4

Hardware

8.3
Reviews score
7.7
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 71% of models
Score components:

70%

7.8

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

8.2
Heart rate monitor
yes
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 9.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 30.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
yes
This smartwatch supports ECG. 82% of smartwatches support ECG.
Availability may vary by region or model version.
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings. 49.5% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
HRV tracking
yes
This smartwatch supports HRV tracking. 54.9% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.5% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
yes
This smartwatch includes a barometer. 46.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 28.9% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
yes
This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor. 67.2% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 3.7% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery life
15 days
Market range: <1 day – >20 days
This smartwatch lasts 15 days on a charge, which is longer than 83% of Smartwatches and the same as 3.9% of Smartwatches.
Up to 20 days without AOD.
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life with GPS on
?
Battery power
480 mAh
Market range: <200 mAh – >500 mAh
This smartwatch has a 480 mAh battery, which is larger than 87.1% of Smartwatches and the same as 0.5% of Smartwatches.
Charge time
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
MagicOS
This smartwatch runs MagicOS, which is less advanced than the system in 98.6% of Smartwatches and equal to 0.5% of Smartwatches.
Software update frequency
?
Third-party app support
no
This smartwatch does not support third-party apps. 51.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 30.8% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 16.7% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
1
Market range: <0 – >5
This smartwatch uses 1 for cellular connectivity which is more advanced than that of 2% of smartwatches and the same as that of 98% of smartwatches.
eSIM
GPS
yes
This smartwatch supports GPS. 40.3% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
yes
This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation. 56.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Dual-frequency GPS
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen size
1.5 inch
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.83 inch
This smartwatch has a 1.5 inch screen, which is larger than 66.8% of Smartwatches and the same as 4.1% of Smartwatches.
Display type
AMOLED
This smartwatch uses AMOLED, which is more advanced than the screen in 46.9% of Smartwatches and equal to 53.1% of Smartwatches.
LTPO panel wording.
Resolution
466x 466
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 466x466 which is higher than that of 84.3% of smartwatches and equal to that of 13.2% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
439 ppi
Market range: <213 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 439 ppi, which is higher than 73.8% of Smartwatches and equal to 0.8% of Smartwatches.
Display brightness
1,500 nits
Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
This smartwatch has a screen brightness of 1,500 nits, which is higher than 82.6% of Smartwatches and equal to 2% of Smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
0.032 GHz
This smartwatch uses a CPU configuration of 0.032 GHz which is slower than that in 96.9% of smartwatches and equal to that in 0.8% of smartwatches.
Processor model
?
RAM
?
Internal storage
8 GB
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch has 8 GB of internal storage, which is more than 65.5% of Smartwatches and equal to 11.3% of Smartwatches.
External memory slot
no
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Honor Watch 5 Ultra vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • ECG support
    This smartwatch supports ECG, the average smartwatch does not. 18.1% of smartwatches support ECG.
    Availability may vary by region or model version.
  • 8 days longer battery life
    This smartwatch runs longer per charge than the average smartwatch (15 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    Up to 20 days without AOD.
    15 days vs 7 days
  • Temperature sensing
    This smartwatch includes a temperature sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 31.9% of smartwatches include a temperature sensor.
  • HRV tracking
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 45.2% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • Stronger display glass
    This smartwatch uses sapphire display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    sapphire vs mineral glass
  • Emergency SOS
    This smartwatch includes Emergency SOS, the average smartwatch does not. 44.8% of smartwatches include Emergency SOS.
  • Supports wireless charging
    This smartwatch supports wireless charging, the average smartwatch does not. 23.4% of smartwatches support wireless charging.
  • NFC functionality
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 45.2% of smartwatches support NFC.
    NFC hardware is present, but functionality may be limited by region/app support.
  • 10.0% higher review score
    Reviews score
    7.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models

    80%

    7.7

    Average grade

    20%

    7.8

    Popularity

    Grades by review (16)
    13 reviews + 3 videos, average 7.6/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    7.7 vs 7.0
  • ECG support
    This smartwatch supports ECG, the average smartwatch does not. 18.1% of smartwatches support ECG.
    Availability may vary by region or model version.
  • Temperature sensing
    This smartwatch includes a temperature sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 31.9% of smartwatches include a temperature sensor.
  • HRV tracking
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 45.2% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • Calorie tracking
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.7% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
  • 4 years newer
    This smartwatch was released more recently than the average smartwatch (2025 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    June 2025
    2025 vs 2021
  • Weight tracking
    This smartwatch supports weight tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 41.9% of smartwatches support weight tracking.
    Tracked through the companion app or smart-scale sync.
  • External heart rate monitor support
    This smartwatch supports external heart rate monitor compatibility, the average smartwatch does not. 46.6% of smartwatches support external heart rate monitor compatibility.
  • Cadence tracking
    This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 32.9% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
  • 8 days longer battery life
    This smartwatch runs longer per charge than the average smartwatch (15 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    Up to 20 days without AOD.
    15 days vs 7 days
  • Supports wireless charging
    This smartwatch supports wireless charging, the average smartwatch does not. 23.4% of smartwatches support wireless charging.
  • 175 mAh larger battery capacity
    This smartwatch has a larger battery than the average smartwatch (480 mAh vs 305 mAh). The average smartwatch has a 305 mAh battery.
    480 mAh vs 305 mAh
  • NFC functionality
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 45.2% of smartwatches support NFC.
    NFC hardware is present, but functionality may be limited by region/app support.
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.5% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • Galileo satellite support
    This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation, the average smartwatch does not. 43.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
  • More current Bluetooth version
    This smartwatch uses a more current Bluetooth version than the average smartwatch (5.2 vs 5).
    5.2 vs 5
  • Stronger display glass
    This smartwatch uses sapphire display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    sapphire vs mineral glass
  • Rugged construction
    This smartwatch has a rugged design, the average smartwatch does not. 41.2% of smartwatches have a rugged design.
  • 750 nits brighter screen
    This smartwatch has a brighter screen than the average smartwatch (1,500 nits vs 750 nits). The average smartwatch peaks at 750 nits.
    1,500 nits vs 750 nits
  • Better case material
    This smartwatch uses titanium for the case material, while the average smartwatch uses polycarbonate.
    grade 5 titanium case
    titanium vs polycarbonate
  • Better band material
    This smartwatch uses silicone, leather, titanium for the band material, while the average smartwatch uses silicone.
    silicone, leather, titanium vs silicone
  • Higher resolution
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 466x466, while the average smartwatch reaches 360x360.
    466x466 vs 360x360
  • 113 ppi sharper screen
    This smartwatch has a sharper screen than the average smartwatch (439 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch has a pixel density of 326 ppi.
    439 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • 0.1 inch larger display
    This smartwatch has a larger screen than the average smartwatch (1.5 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch has a 1.4 inch screen.
    1.5 inch vs 1.4 inch
  • Emergency SOS
    This smartwatch includes Emergency SOS, the average smartwatch does not. 44.8% of smartwatches include Emergency SOS.
  • 1 more microphones
    This smartwatch has more microphones than the average smartwatch (2 vs 1). The average smartwatch has 1 microphones.
    2 vs 1
  • 2x more internal storage
    This smartwatch has more internal storage than the average smartwatch (8 GB vs 4 GB). The average smartwatch has 4 GB of internal storage.
    8 GB vs 4 GB
  • No third-party apps
    This smartwatch does not support third-party apps, the average smartwatch does. 51.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • 10 m shallower water rating
    This smartwatch is rated for shallower water than the average smartwatch (40 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch is rated to 50 m.
    40 m vs 50 m
  • More basic operating system
    This smartwatch runs a more basic operating system than the average smartwatch (MagicOS vs Proprietary OS).
    MagicOS vs Proprietary OS
  • 6.8 g heavier
    This smartwatch is heavier than the average smartwatch (51.8 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45 g.
    Weight refers to watch case without strap/band.
    51.8 g vs 45 g
  • 2.27x more expensive
    Honor Watch 5 Ultra is more expensive than the average smartwatch (£250 vs £110).
    £250 vs £110
  • Slower CPU speed
    This smartwatch uses a CPU configuration of 0.032 GHz, while the average smartwatch uses 1 GHz.
    0.032 GHz vs 1 GHz
  • 3.8 mm wider case
    This smartwatch has a wider case than the average smartwatch (46.3 mm vs 42.5 mm). The average smartwatch measures 42.5 mm across.
    46.3 mm vs 42.5 mm
  • 10 °C lower heat tolerance
    This smartwatch tolerates a lower temperature than the average smartwatch (35 °C vs 45 °C). The average smartwatch is rated up to 45 °C.
    35 °C vs 45 °C
  • 2.27x more expensive
    Honor Watch 5 Ultra is more expensive than the average smartwatch (£250 vs £110).
    £250 vs £110
  • 10 m shallower water rating
    This smartwatch is rated for shallower water than the average smartwatch (40 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch is rated to 50 m.
    40 m vs 50 m
  • 6.8 g heavier
    This smartwatch is heavier than the average smartwatch (51.8 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45 g.
    Weight refers to watch case without strap/band.
    51.8 g vs 45 g
  • 3.8 mm wider case
    This smartwatch has a wider case than the average smartwatch (46.3 mm vs 42.5 mm). The average smartwatch measures 42.5 mm across.
    46.3 mm vs 42.5 mm
  • 10 °C lower heat tolerance
    This smartwatch tolerates a lower temperature than the average smartwatch (35 °C vs 45 °C). The average smartwatch is rated up to 45 °C.
    35 °C vs 45 °C
  • No third-party apps
    This smartwatch does not support third-party apps, the average smartwatch does. 51.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • More basic operating system
    This smartwatch runs a more basic operating system than the average smartwatch (MagicOS vs Proprietary OS).
    MagicOS vs Proprietary OS
  • Slower CPU speed
    This smartwatch uses a CPU configuration of 0.032 GHz, while the average smartwatch uses 1 GHz.
    0.032 GHz vs 1 GHz

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
gizmochina
≈ estimated
05/03/2025
Hands-on review · battery, GPS and health tracking tests
Verdict
Honor Watch 5 Ultra is a very good all-round smartwatch with a tough titanium design and strong health and sports tracking.
8.0
eizuwan
≈ estimated
11/05/2026
First look · unboxing and first impressions
Verdict
Honor Watch 5 Ultra makes a positive first impression with its premium look and comfortable fit, though long-term performance is still unclear.
8.0
Techi
≈ estimated
12/08/2025
Hands-on review · running and sensor tests
Verdict
Honor Watch 5 Ultra is a solid overall package and a serious contender for health and sports tracking.
9.0
Pro Tech City
≈ estimated
04/07/2025
Unboxing and first impressions · Commander edition
Verdict
Honor Watch 5 Ultra has outstanding design and texture, making it easy to wear every day despite weaker water resistance.
Hands-on video, no verdict
Not graded
Hands-on video, no verdict
Overview video
Overview video
Not graded

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

9.0
tomsguide.com
✓ explicit
02/03/2025
Hands-on review · Fitness and sleep
Verdict
The Honor Watch 5 Ultra is a comfortable, bright watch with detailed sleep and fitness tracking and very long battery life, and it suits Android and iPhone users.
6.0
androidauthority.com
≈ estimated
02/03/2025
Hands-on review · Design and software
Verdict
The Honor Watch 5 Ultra looks premium and lasts a long time, but its large case and lack of apps suit only buyers with simple needs.
8.0
gadgetmatch.com
≈ estimated
03/03/2025
First look · Octagonal titanium watch
Verdict
The Honor Watch 5 Ultra is a light titanium watch with a bright screen, suited to casual workouts, though its rubber strap and limited music storage feel basic.
8.0
androidheadlines.com
✓ explicit
05/03/2025
Two-week test · Fitness watch
Verdict
The Honor Watch 5 Ultra is a light fitness watch that lasts around two weeks, best for buyers who don't need Google apps or a big music library.
7.0
techadvisor.com
✓ explicit
08/04/2025
Expert review · Octagonal titanium watch
Verdict
The Honor Watch 5 Ultra suits buyers wanting a good-looking titanium watch with long battery life, though basic menus and an ECG that isn't live yet show its limits.
7.0
techradar.com
✓ explicit
05/05/2025
Week-long test · Health-focused watch
Verdict
The Honor Watch 5 Ultra is a tough, good-looking watch with strong health tracking, but the lack of third-party apps and payments makes it hard to recommend.
6.0
notebookcheck.net
≈ estimated
16/05/2025
Lab test · Titanium smartwatch
Verdict
The Honor Watch 5 Ultra has a high-quality titanium build and good battery life, but missing message replies and rough software keep it from being a strong pick.
9.0
pocket-lint.com
≈ estimated
19/05/2025
Hands-on test · Titanium watch
Verdict
The Honor Watch 5 Ultra is a stylish, light titanium watch that lasts around a week with the always-on display, though it has no app store.
6.0
wareable.com
≈ estimated
11/06/2025
Full review · Fitness watch
Verdict
The Honor Watch 5 Ultra is a solid sleep and fitness tracker with a light titanium case, but its cheap-feeling software and lack of LTE hold it back.
8.6
gadreview.com
✓ explicit
19/05/2026
Full review · Health monitoring watch
Verdict
The Honor Watch 5 Ultra is a health-focused watch with ECG, sapphire glass and about two weeks of battery, but without NFC it can't do tap-to-pay.
7.0
notebookcheck.com
≈ estimated
07/05/2025
Hands-on test · Titanium smartwatch
Verdict
The Honor Watch 5 Ultra is a titanium watch with a bright screen and wireless charging, but its features are basic and you can't reply to messages.
6.0
notebookcheck.nl
≈ estimated
16/05/2025
Beta-app test · Titanium smartwatch
Verdict
The Honor Watch 5 Ultra looks sleek and lasts well on a charge, but no message replies and clumsy app translations hold it back.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Honor Watch 5 Ultra

  • Premium build with Grade 5 titanium housing and scratch-resistant sapphire glass
  • Exceptional battery life, lasting up to 15 days in typical usage or 5-7 days with Heavy/AOD use
  • Large and vibrant 1.5-inch LTPO AMOLED display with responsive 60Hz refresh rate
  • Quick and accurate health features, including a one-tap 'Health Scan' for heart rate, SpO2, and stress
  • Precise GPS tracking and detailed sleep monitoring with snore detection
  • Versatile design that suits both casual and business styles, often compared to more expensive 'Ultra' models
  • Compatible with both Android and iOS via the Honor Health app

What customers don't like about Honor Watch 5 Ultra

  • Severe lack of third-party app support (no Strava, Spotify, or WhatsApp standalone apps)
  • Proprietary MagicOS lacks advanced features like contactless payments (NFC exists but is not functional for banking)
  • Limited notification utility: messages are 'read-only' with no ability to reply
  • Available in only one 46mm case size, which may be too bulky for smaller wrists
  • Software experience can feel 'half-baked' with occasional inconsistent translations
  • Heart rate monitoring can occasionally overreport during high-intensity workouts compared to chest straps
  • Requires a separate app for full functionality, and some features like ECG may be region-locked or delayed

Verdict

The Honor Watch 5 Ultra is a premium, rugged smartwatch featuring a 1.5-inch LTPO AMOLED display (466 x 466 pixels, 1,265 nits peak brightness) protected by scratch-resistant sapphire glass and housed in an aerospace-grade 5 titanium alloy octagonal case. Its main characteristics include a 480mAh battery providing up to 15 days of life, 5ATM water resistance with a 40m free diving mode, and comprehensive health monitoring through the One-tap Health Scan for heart rate, SpO2, and stress. Notable pros include its high-end build quality, accurate sleep tracking with snoring recording, and support for Qi wireless and reverse charging. However, it suffers from significant cons such as the lack of third-party app support and NFC mobile payments, no fall or sleep apnea detection, and limited functionality when used with non-Honor smartphones.

Compare Honor Watch 5 Ultra with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Honor Watch 5 Ultra and other Smartwatches

No results found