OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Smartwatches Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 3,488 independent expert reviews and 5,192 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v2.0

Garmin Venu 2 Review | 126 Data compared

Avg. price:~£250Screen size:1.30 inchBattery life:11 daysDisplay type:AMOLED

Garmin Venu 2 Review: Compare 126 technical specifications and 18 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

7.9

Overall score

Score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartwatch's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartwatches on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 83% of models
Score components

70%

7.4

Technical score

30%

8.9

Review score ( 6 · 12)

Review score 30% · 8.9 · based on 18 independent reviews
Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 30%, technical score 70%. This model has enough reviews, so its review score is the weighted average of their grades. 14 more reviews are not scored yet.
â–²Better than 83% of smartwatches
7.4

Technical score

Technical score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 75% of models
Score components

24%

6.8

Health

21%

9.2

Fitness

16%

5.8

Battery

14%

8.0

Smart features

12%

7.4

Connectivity

9%

7.8

Display & Design

4%

5.2

Hardware

â–²Better than 75% of smartwatches
8.9

Review score

Review score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 100% of models
Grades by review (18)
6 reviews: 1 with a printed score, 5 estimated from the review. 12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 3
✓ explicit
1

10.2%

10

techradar.com

≈ estimated
2

10.2%

9.5

expertreviews.co.uk

8.2%

9.0

michaelbrooks.co.uk

Video reviews 3

4.1%

9.0

Mike O'Brien

4.1%

9.0

DesFit

2%

7.0

The Run Testers

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
★Better than 100% of smartwatches
  • garmin-venu-2
  • garmin-venu-2
  • garmin-venu-2
  • garmin-venu-2
  • garmin-venu-2
  • garmin-venu-2
  • garmin-venu-2
  • garmin-venu-2
  • garmin-venu-2
  • garmin-venu-2
  • garmin-venu-2
  • garmin-venu-2
  • garmin-venu-2
  • garmin-venu-2
  • garmin-venu-2
  • garmin-venu-2
garmin-venu-2
garmin-venu-2
garmin-venu-2
garmin-venu-2
garmin-venu-2
garmin-venu-2
garmin-venu-2
garmin-venu-2
garmin-venu-2
garmin-venu-2
garmin-venu-2
garmin-venu-2
garmin-venu-2
garmin-venu-2
garmin-venu-2
garmin-venu-2

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Garmin Venu 2

Technical score
Technical score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 75% of models
Score components:

24%

6.8

Health

21%

9.2

Fitness

16%

5.8

Battery

14%

8.0

Smart features

12%

7.4

Connectivity

9%

7.8

Display & Design

4%

5.2

Hardware

7.4
Review score
Review score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 100% of models
Grades by review (18)
6 reviews: 1 with a printed score, 5 estimated from the review. 12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 3
✓ explicit
1

10.2%

10

techradar.com

≈ estimated
2

10.2%

9.5

expertreviews.co.uk

8.2%

9.0

michaelbrooks.co.uk

Video reviews 3

4.1%

9.0

Mike O'Brien

4.1%

9.0

DesFit

2%

7.0

The Run Testers

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
8.9
Popularity
Popularity
9.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartwatch.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 91% of models
Popularity:
Garmin Venu 2 has a popularity of 9.7 points, which is higher than 91% of smartwatches.
9.7
Value for money
Value for money
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 83% of models
Score components:

60%

7.9

Overall score

40%

9.2

Price

8.3
Brand name
Garmin
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
â–² Better than 11% of models
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 10.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
â–² Better than 33% of models
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 33.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
Readings are for wellness use, not medical diagnosis.
ECG
no
ECG
no
â–¼ Worse than 17% of models
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
â–² Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings. 51.9% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
Supports abnormal high/low heart-rate alerts (typically after inactivity).
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
Accelerometer
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.6% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
yes
Barometer
yes
â–² Better than 51% of models
This smartwatch includes a barometer. 50.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
Gyroscope
yes
â–² Better than 30% of models
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 30.2% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
yes
Cadence sensor
yes
â–² Better than 69% of models
This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor. 69% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
Distance tracking
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 4.1% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery life
11 days
Battery life
11 days
â–² Better than 70% of models
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch offers a battery life of 11 days which is longer than that of 70.3% of smartwatches and equal to that of 2% of smartwatches.
Battery life in training mode
21 h
Battery life in training mode
21 h
â–² Better than 54% of models
Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
This smartwatch lasts 21 h in training mode which is longer than 54.5% of smartwatches and equal to that of 1.9% of smartwatches.
Up to 22 hours in gps mode, which is the standard "training mode.
Battery life with GPS on
22 h
Battery life with GPS on
22 h
â–² Better than 57% of models
Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
This smartwatch lasts 22 h with GPS on which is longer than 57.1% of smartwatches and equal to that of 2.5% of smartwatches.
Battery power
210 mAh
Battery power
210 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a battery capacity of 210 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 83.4% of smartwatches and equal to those in 2.7% of smartwatches.
Charge time
120 min
Charge time
120 min
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges in 120 min which is faster than 13.1% of smartwatches and equal to the charge time of 44.2% of smartwatches.
Normalized from hour-based sources to 7,200 minutes.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Garmin OS
Operating system
Garmin OS
â–² Better than 71% of models
This smartwatch runs Garmin OS which is more advanced than the operating system in 71.1% of smartwatches and the same as that in 7.7% of smartwatches.
Software update frequency
occasional
Software update frequency
occasional
â–² Better than 58% of models
This smartwatch has occasional software update support which is more active than that of 57.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 36.2% of smartwatches.
Updates are typically released about every 3 months.
Third-party app support
yes
Third-party app support
yes
â–² Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports third-party apps. 52.4% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
no
Voice assistant support
no
â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
This smartwatch does not support voice assistants. 67.8% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
Cellular module
no
â–¼ Worse than 18% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 18% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
â–² Better than 44% of models
This smartwatch supports GPS. 43.9% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
yes
Galileo support
yes
â–² Better than 62% of models
This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation. 61.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Compass
yes
Compass
yes
â–² Better than 47% of models
This smartwatch includes a compass. 47.5% of smartwatches include a compass.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen size
1.3 inch
Screen size
1.3 inch
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
This smartwatch has a screen size of 1.3 inch which is smaller than the screens of 66.8% of smartwatches and equal to those of 11.2% of smartwatches.
Some sources mention multiple/uncertain size variants.
Display type
AMOLED
Display type
AMOLED
â–² Better than 50% of models
This smartwatch uses a AMOLED display type which is more advanced than that of 49.9% of smartwatches and the same as that of 50.1% of smartwatches.
Resolution
416x 416
Resolution
416x 416
â–² Better than 75% of models
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 416x416 which is higher than that of 74.7% of smartwatches and equal to that of 3.1% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
453 ppi
Pixel density
453 ppi
â–² Better than 75% of models
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 453 ppi which is higher than that of 75.3% of smartwatches and equal to that of 1.9% of smartwatches.
Display brightness
?
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
?
Processor model
?
RAM
?
Internal storage
8 GB
Internal storage
8 GB
â–² Better than 68% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch uses 8 GB for internal storage which is larger than that of 67.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 12.1% of smartwatches.
External memory slot
no
External memory slot
no
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Garmin Venu 2 vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • Crash detection capability
    Crash detection
    yes
    â–² Better than 87% of models
    This smartwatch supports crash detection, the average smartwatch does not. 12.6% of smartwatches support crash detection.
    Requires paired phone/network and/or specific activities for automatic alerts.
  • Fall detection
    Fall detection
    yes
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    This smartwatch supports fall detection, the average smartwatch does not. 21.3% of smartwatches support fall detection.
  • HRV tracking
    HRV tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 40.8% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • VO2 max measurement
    VO2 max measurement
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch measures VO2 max, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • More advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Garmin OS
    â–² Better than 71% of models
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Garmin OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Garmin OS vs Proprietary OS
  • Emergency SOS
    Emergency SOS
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch includes Emergency SOS, the average smartwatch does not. 42.8% of smartwatches include Emergency SOS.
    SOS feature has implementation limits (phone/app/subscription/activity dependent).
  • NFC functionality
    NFC
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 43.4% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • Third-party app support
    Third-party app support
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports third-party apps, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • 58.2% more popular
    Garmin Venu 2 has a higher popularity than the average smartwatch (9.68 vs 6.1).
    9.68 vs 6.12
  • 10% better value for money
    Garmin Venu 2 has a higher value-for-money score than the average smartwatch (8.27 vs 7.5).
    8.27 vs 7.52
  • HRV tracking
    HRV tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 40.8% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • VO2 max measurement
    VO2 max measurement
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch measures VO2 max, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • Irregular heart rate alerts
    Irregular heart rate warnings
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does not. 48.1% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
    Supports abnormal high/low heart-rate alerts (typically after inactivity).
  • Weight tracking
    Weight tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This smartwatch supports weight tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 39.1% of smartwatches support weight tracking.
    Tracked through the companion app or smart-scale sync.
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    This smartwatch tracks water intake, the average smartwatch does not. 44% of smartwatches track water intake.
  • Perspiration monitoring
    Perspiration monitoring
    yes
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    This smartwatch tracks perspiration, the average smartwatch does not. 14.1% of smartwatches track perspiration.
    Perspiration tracking may be estimated from activity data in companion apps.
  • External heart rate monitor support
    External heart rate monitor compatibility
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports external heart rate monitor compatibility, the average smartwatch does not. 42.7% of smartwatches support external heart rate monitor compatibility.
  • Barometer sensor included
    Barometer
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This smartwatch includes a barometer, the average smartwatch does not. 49.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • Cadence tracking
    Cadence sensor
    yes
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 31.1% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
  • Route support
    Route support
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch supports route support, the average smartwatch does not. 50% of smartwatches support route support.
    Route support available via companion app.
  • 610 m higher max altitude
    Maximum altitude
    9,144 m
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    Market range: <3k m – >9.1k m
    This smartwatch supports a higher maximum altitude than the average smartwatch (9144 m vs 8534 m). The average smartwatch reaches 8534 m.
    Includes conversion from feet to meters.
    9,144 m vs 8,534 m
  • 4 days day/s longer battery life
    Battery life
    11 days
    â–² Better than 70% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 11 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    11 days vs 7 days
  • 2 h longer GPS battery life
    Battery life with GPS on
    22 h
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
    This smartwatch lasts longer with GPS on than the average smartwatch (22 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h.
    22 h vs 20 h
  • NFC functionality
    NFC
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 43.4% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    Wi-Fi support
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.3% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • Supports ANT+
    ANT+ support
    yes
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    This smartwatch supports ANT+, the average smartwatch does not. 11.7% of smartwatches support ANT+.
  • Galileo satellite support
    Galileo support
    yes
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation, the average smartwatch does not. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
  • Stronger display glass
    Display glass type
    Corning Gorilla Glass 3
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    This smartwatch uses Corning Gorilla Glass 3 display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 3 vs mineral glass
  • 127 ppi higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    453 ppi
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
    This smartwatch has a higher pixel density than the average smartwatch (453 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch display reaches 326 ppi.
    453 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • 8 mm narrower band
    Width of band
    14.0 mm
    ★ Better than 99% of models
    Market range: <20 mm – >22 mm
    This smartwatch has a narrower band width than the average smartwatch (14 mm vs 22 mm). The average smartwatch band is 22.0 mm wide.
    14.0 mm vs 22.0 mm
  • 15 °C higher max temperature
    Maximum operating temperature
    60.0 °C
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    Market range: <35 °C – >60 °C
    This smartwatch handles a higher maximum operating temperature than the average smartwatch (60 °C vs 45 °C). The average smartwatch reaches 45.0 °C.
    60.0 °C vs 45.0 °C
  • Higher resolution
    Display type
    416 x 416
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 416x416, while the average smartwatch reaches 352x430.
    416x416 vs 352x430
  • Better case material
    Case material
    stainless steel, fiber-reinforced polymer
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    This smartwatch uses stainless steel, fiber-reinforced polymer for the case material, while the average smartwatch uses polycarbonate.
    stainless steel, fiber-reinforced polymer vs polycarbonate
  • Crash detection capability
    Crash detection
    yes
    â–² Better than 87% of models
    This smartwatch supports crash detection, the average smartwatch does not. 12.6% of smartwatches support crash detection.
    Requires paired phone/network and/or specific activities for automatic alerts.
  • Fall detection
    Fall detection
    yes
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    This smartwatch supports fall detection, the average smartwatch does not. 21.3% of smartwatches support fall detection.
  • More advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Garmin OS
    â–² Better than 71% of models
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Garmin OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Garmin OS vs Proprietary OS
  • Emergency SOS
    Emergency SOS
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch includes Emergency SOS, the average smartwatch does not. 42.8% of smartwatches include Emergency SOS.
    SOS feature has implementation limits (phone/app/subscription/activity dependent).
  • Third-party app support
    Third-party app support
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports third-party apps, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • More frequent updates
    Software update frequency
    occasional
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    This smartwatch receives occasional software updates, while the average smartwatch receives ended updates.
    Updates are typically released about every 3 months.
    occasional vs ended
  • No multi-sport mode
    Multi-sport mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a multi-sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 68.4% of smartwatches include a multi-sport mode.
  • No voice assistant
    Voice assistant support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not support voice assistants, the average smartwatch does. 67.7% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
  • No call answering
    Call answering
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This smartwatch does not support call answering, the average smartwatch does. 58.1% of smartwatches support call answering.
  • No speaker
    Built-in speaker
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.
  • No voice command support
    Voice commands
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartwatch does not support voice commands, the average smartwatch does. 67% of smartwatches support voice commands.
  • No call controls
    Call control
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    This smartwatch does not offer call control, the average smartwatch does. 90.9% of smartwatches offer call control.
  • 90 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery life
    210 mAh days
    â–² Better than 70% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartwatch (210 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    210 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • 0.1 inch smaller screen size
    Screen size
    1.30 inch
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
    This smartwatch has a smaller screen size than the average smartwatch (1.3 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch screen is 1.40 inch.
    Some sources mention multiple/uncertain size variants.
    1.30 inch vs 1.40 inch
  • 92.3% more expensive
    Garmin Venu 2 is more expensive than the average smartwatch (£250 vs £130).
    £250 vs £130
  • No multi-sport mode
    Multi-sport mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a multi-sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 68.4% of smartwatches include a multi-sport mode.
  • 55 fewer exercise profiles
    Multi-sport mode
    25
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartwatch supports fewer exercise modes than the average smartwatch (25 vs 80). The average smartwatch supports 80 exercise modes.
    Reported as at least 25 exercise modes.
    25 vs 80
  • 90 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery life
    210 mAh days
    â–² Better than 70% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartwatch (210 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    210 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • 0.1 inch smaller screen size
    Screen size
    1.30 inch
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
    This smartwatch has a smaller screen size than the average smartwatch (1.3 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch screen is 1.40 inch.
    Some sources mention multiple/uncertain size variants.
    1.30 inch vs 1.40 inch
  • 0.6 mm thicker watch body
    Thickness
    12.20 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <9.8 mm – >14.1 mm
    This smartwatch is thicker than the average smartwatch (12.2 mm vs 11.6 mm). The average smartwatch thickness is 11.6 mm.
    12.20 mm vs 11.6 mm
  • 4 g heavier weight
    Weight
    49.0 g
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is heavier than the average smartwatch (49 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    49.0 g vs 45.0 g
  • 3.4 mm wider watch width
    Width
    45.4 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <34.6 mm – >46.8 mm
    This smartwatch is wider than the average smartwatch (45.4 mm vs 42 mm). The average smartwatch width is 42.0 mm.
    45.4 mm vs 42.0 mm
  • No voice assistant
    Voice assistant support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not support voice assistants, the average smartwatch does. 67.7% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
  • No call answering
    Call answering
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This smartwatch does not support call answering, the average smartwatch does. 58.1% of smartwatches support call answering.
  • No voice command support
    Voice commands
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartwatch does not support voice commands, the average smartwatch does. 67% of smartwatches support voice commands.
  • No call controls
    Call control
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    This smartwatch does not offer call control, the average smartwatch does. 90.9% of smartwatches offer call control.
  • No smart alarm
    Smart alarm
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 52.7% of smartwatches support smart alarms.
  • No camera remote
    Camera remote control
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    This smartwatch does not include built-in camera remote control, the average smartwatch does. 85.6% of smartwatches that are equipped with a camera include built-in camera remote control.
  • No speaker
    Built-in speaker
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Mike O'Brien
≈ estimated
09/05/2021
Hands-on review · accuracy tests, interface and battery life
Verdict
Garmin Venu 2 is pricey, but a top pick for accuracy, comfort and fitness tracking.
9.0
DesFit
≈ estimated
22/04/2021
In-depth review · running, cycling, swimming and skiing tests
Verdict
Garmin Venu 2 is an excellent watch, though a chest strap is still best for precise heart rate.
7.0
The Run Testers
≈ estimated
22/04/2021
First run review · early impressions
Verdict
Garmin Venu 2 has a nice screen and solid sports tracking, but it costs more and is not better value than Forerunner models.
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

What reviewers agree on

Based on 9 · 12

The display and heart rate accuracy earn wide praise, but reviewers knock the thin app store and feel it's overpriced.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

uk.pcmag.com
22/04/2021
Not graded yet
theguardian.com
05/07/2021
Not graded yet
t3.com
04/01/2022
Not graded yet
9.5
expertreviews.co.uk
≈ estimated
26/03/2024
Full review · Battery and sports
Verdict
The Garmin Venu 2 is a light, comfortable sports watch with up to 11 days of battery, though it can't make calls and has few apps.
9.0
michaelbrooks.co.uk
≈ estimated
10/10/2024
Six-month review · Strength and music
Verdict
The Garmin Venu 2 suits people who want a sleek watch for tracking gym lifts and walks, but it can't stream music, so tracks must be downloaded first.
dcrainmaker.com
22/04/2021
Not graded yet
gq-magazine.co.uk
07/05/2021
Not graded yet
coachweb.com
01/08/2021
Not graded yet
10
techradar.com
✓ explicit
06/08/2022
Hands-on test · Running and gym
Verdict
The Garmin Venu 2 suits runners and gym-goers, with very accurate GPS and broad health tracking, though its design has barely changed from the original Venu.
correrunamaraton.com
27/05/2021
Not graded yet
9.0
topesdegama.com
≈ estimated
23/06/2025
Hands-on review · Cycling and calls
Verdict
The Garmin Venu 2 is a comfortable, elegant sports watch with very precise GPS and clear calls, though its battery falls short of Garmin's claims.
andreagaleazzi.com
13/05/2021
Not graded yet

Third-party reviews

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Garmin Venu 2

  • Bright and sharp AMOLED touchscreen display that is easy to read in most lighting conditions
  • Excellent battery life, typically lasting between 5 to 11 days depending on settings and usage
  • Comprehensive health and fitness tracking, including SpO2, sleep scores, and Body Battery energy monitoring
  • Highly accurate GPS that connects quickly for outdoor activity tracking
  • Lightweight and comfortable design suitable for 24/7 wear and sleep tracking
  • Onboard music storage for up to 650 songs with support for offline Spotify, Amazon Music, and Deezer
  • Rapid charging capability, with 10 minutes of charging providing roughly one day of battery life

What we don't like about Garmin Venu 2

  • Limited 'smart' features compared to rivals, lacking a voice assistant and the ability to make calls from the wrist
  • Relatively high price point compared to some other fitness-focused smartwatches
  • Sparse third-party app selection in the Garmin Connect IQ store
  • Garmin Pay support is limited, with many major banks not participating
  • Lacks advanced training metrics found on higher-end Garmin models, such as recovery time or training load
  • Always-on display mode significantly drains battery life, reducing it to around 2-3 days
  • Optical heart rate sensor can struggle with accuracy during high-intensity interval training (HIIT)

Verdict

The Garmin Venu 2 is a fitness-oriented smartwatch featuring a 1.3-inch AMOLED touchscreen with 416 x 416 resolution and a durable Corning Gorilla Glass 3 lens. Available in 45mm (Venu 2) and 40mm (Venu 2S) case sizes, it includes advanced health sensors for heart rate, blood oxygen (SpO2), stress, and sleep tracking, alongside GPS and support for over 25 built-in sports apps. Main pros include a long battery life of up to 11 days in smartwatch mode, rapid charging, and offline music storage for up to 650 songs. Main cons include a high price point, limited third-party app selection compared to rivals, and the absence of a microphone for voice assistants or wrist-based calls.

Compare Garmin Venu 2 with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Garmin Venu 2 and other Smartwatches

No results found