OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartwatches Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v3.0

Amazfit T-Rex 2 review: 127 specs compared

Avg. price:~£?Screen size:1.39 inchBattery life:24 daysDisplay type:AMOLED

Amazfit T-Rex 2 Review: Compare 127 technical specifications, 41 expert and video reviews and 1 best-of list to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

Amazfit T-Rex 2
8.0/10

Overall score

Score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 83% of models
Score components

35%

7.5

Technical score

30%

7.5

List score

25%

8.6

Reviews score

10%

9.7

Sentiment score

▲Better than 83% of smartwatches
?

Value for money

Value for money
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.0

Overall score

30%

?

Price

Price not known yet
7.5

Technical score

Technical score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 71% of models
Score components

24%

7.6

Health

21%

9.9

Fitness

16%

7.6

Battery

14%

6.1

Smart features

12%

6.6

Connectivity

9%

7.6

Display & Design

4%

1.7

Hardware

▲Better than 71%
8.6

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.5 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 93% of models

80%

8.5

Average grade

20%

9.1

Popularity

Grades by review (41)
6 reviews + 35 videos, average 8.5/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
★Better than 93%
7.5

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (1)
List score: in 1 of 120 lists (1%)
▲Better than 76%
  • amazfit-t-rex-2
  • amazfit-t-rex-2
  • amazfit-t-rex-2
  • amazfit-t-rex-2
  • amazfit-t-rex-2
  • amazfit-t-rex-2
  • amazfit-t-rex-2
  • amazfit-t-rex-2
amazfit-t-rex-2
amazfit-t-rex-2
amazfit-t-rex-2
amazfit-t-rex-2
amazfit-t-rex-2
amazfit-t-rex-2
amazfit-t-rex-2
amazfit-t-rex-2
Best prices
    N/A~ £?
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Smartwatches model ranking

Ranked #569 of 777 models in Smartwatches (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Amazfit T-Rex 2

Technical score
Technical score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 71% of models
Score components:

24%

7.6

Health

21%

9.9

Fitness

16%

7.6

Battery

14%

6.1

Smart features

12%

6.6

Connectivity

9%

7.6

Display & Design

4%

1.7

Hardware

7.5
Reviews score
8.6
List score
7.5
Value for money
Value for money
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 89% of models
Score components:

70%

8.0

Overall score

30%

?

Price

8.6
Heart rate monitor
yes
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 9.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 30.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 18% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
?
HRV tracking
yes
This smartwatch supports HRV tracking. 54.9% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.5% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
yes
This smartwatch includes a barometer. 46.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 28.9% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
?
Distance tracking
yes
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 3.7% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery life
24 days
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch lasts 24 days on a charge, which is longer than 93.2% of Smartwatches and the same as 0.7% of Smartwatches.
Battery life in training mode
50 h
Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
This smartwatch records workouts for 50 h on a charge, which is longer than 91.5% of Smartwatches and the same as 2% of Smartwatches.
Battery life with GPS on
26 h
Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
This smartwatch lasts 26 h with GPS on, which is longer than 63.2% of Smartwatches and the same as 2.4% of Smartwatches.
Battery power
500 mAh
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a 500 mAh battery, which is larger than 89.8% of Smartwatches and the same as 2.2% of Smartwatches.
Charge time
120 min
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges from empty in 120 min, which is quicker than 13.3% of Smartwatches and the same as 44.6% of Smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Zepp OS
This smartwatch runs Zepp OS, which is more advanced than the system in 58.9% of Smartwatches and equal to 7% of Smartwatches.
Software update frequency
?
Third-party app support
yes
This smartwatch supports third-party apps. 48.5% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
no
This smartwatch does not support voice assistants. 69.3% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 16.6% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
yes
This smartwatch supports GPS. 40.3% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
yes
This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation. 56.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Dual-frequency GPS
yes
Amazfit T-Rex 2 supports dual-frequency GPS. 85% of Smartwatches offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen size
1.39 inch
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
This smartwatch has a 1.39 inch screen, which is smaller than 51.3% of Smartwatches and the same as 9% of Smartwatches.
Display type
AMOLED
This smartwatch uses AMOLED, which is more advanced than the screen in 46.9% of Smartwatches and equal to 53.1% of Smartwatches.
Resolution
454x 454
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 454x454 which is higher than that of 76.5% of smartwatches and equal to that of 7% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
326 ppi
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 326 ppi, which is higher than 45% of Smartwatches and equal to 8.7% of Smartwatches.
Display brightness
1,000 nits
Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
This smartwatch has a screen brightness of 1,000 nits, which is higher than 53.5% of Smartwatches and equal to 27% of Smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
?
Processor model
NXP 555
This smartwatch uses the NXP 555 processor model.
RAM
?
Internal storage
8 GB
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch has 8 GB of internal storage, which is more than 65.5% of Smartwatches and equal to 11.3% of Smartwatches.
External memory slot
no
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Amazfit T-Rex 2 vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • 17 days longer battery life
    This smartwatch runs longer per charge than the average smartwatch (24 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    24 days vs 7 days
  • 30 h longer training battery life
    This smartwatch lasts longer in training mode than the average smartwatch (50 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h in training mode.
    50 h vs 20 h
  • HRV tracking
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 45.2% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • Maps support
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 34.4% of smartwatches support maps.
  • External heart rate monitor support
    This smartwatch supports external heart rate monitor compatibility, the average smartwatch does not. 46.6% of smartwatches support external heart rate monitor compatibility.
  • More advanced operating system
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Zepp OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Zepp OS vs Proprietary OS
  • Supports dual-frequency GPS
    Amazfit T-Rex 2 supports dual-frequency GPS, while the average smartwatch does not. 15.1% of Smartwatches support dual-frequency GPS.
  • Galileo satellite support
    This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation, the average smartwatch does not. 43.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
  • 22.9% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.5 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ★ Better than 93% of models

    80%

    8.5

    Average grade

    20%

    9.1

    Popularity

    Grades by review (41)
    6 reviews + 35 videos, average 8.5/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.6 vs 7.0
  • 29.3% higher sentiment score
    9.7 vs 7.5
  • 10.7% better value for money
    Amazfit T-Rex 2 has a higher value-for-money score than the average smartwatch (8.59 vs 7.8).
    8.59 vs 7.76
  • HRV tracking
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 45.2% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • External heart rate monitor support
    This smartwatch supports external heart rate monitor compatibility, the average smartwatch does not. 46.6% of smartwatches support external heart rate monitor compatibility.
  • 60 more exercise types
    This smartwatch includes more exercise types than the average smartwatch (150 vs 90). The average smartwatch includes 90 exercise types.
    150 vs 90
  • 17 days longer battery life
    This smartwatch runs longer per charge than the average smartwatch (24 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    24 days vs 7 days
  • 30 h longer training battery life
    This smartwatch lasts longer in training mode than the average smartwatch (50 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h in training mode.
    50 h vs 20 h
  • 195 mAh larger battery capacity
    This smartwatch has a larger battery than the average smartwatch (500 mAh vs 305 mAh). The average smartwatch has a 305 mAh battery.
    500 mAh vs 305 mAh
  • 5 h longer GPS battery life
    This smartwatch lasts longer with GPS on than the average smartwatch (26 h vs 21 h). The average smartwatch lasts 21 h with GPS on.
    26 h vs 21 h
  • Maps support
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 34.4% of smartwatches support maps.
  • Supports dual-frequency GPS
    Amazfit T-Rex 2 supports dual-frequency GPS, while the average smartwatch does not. 15.1% of Smartwatches support dual-frequency GPS.
  • Galileo satellite support
    This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation, the average smartwatch does not. 43.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
  • Stronger display glass
    This smartwatch uses Corning Gorilla Glass 3 display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 3 vs mineral glass
  • Rugged construction
    This smartwatch has a rugged design, the average smartwatch does not. 41.3% of smartwatches have a rugged design.
  • 50 m deeper water rating
    This smartwatch is rated for deeper water than the average smartwatch (100 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch is rated to 50 m.
    100 m vs 50 m
  • Higher resolution
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 454x454, while the average smartwatch reaches 360x360.
    454x454 vs 360x360
  • 250 nits brighter screen
    This smartwatch has a brighter screen than the average smartwatch (1000 nits vs 750 nits). The average smartwatch peaks at 750 nits.
    1,000 nits vs 750 nits
  • More advanced operating system
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Zepp OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Zepp OS vs Proprietary OS
  • 2x more internal storage
    This smartwatch has more internal storage than the average smartwatch (8 GB vs 4 GB). The average smartwatch has 4 GB of internal storage.
    8 GB vs 4 GB
  • No speaker
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.7% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.
  • No voice assistant
    This smartwatch does not support voice assistants, the average smartwatch does. 69.2% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
  • No voice command support
    This smartwatch does not support voice commands, the average smartwatch does. 68.1% of smartwatches support voice commands.
  • 1 fewer microphones
    This smartwatch has fewer microphones than the average smartwatch (0 vs 1). The average smartwatch has 1 microphones.
    0 vs 1
  • 21.5 g heavier
    This smartwatch is heavier than the average smartwatch (66.5 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    66.5 g vs 45.0 g
  • 1.95 mm thicker
    This smartwatch is thicker than the average smartwatch (13.7 mm vs 11.7 mm). The average smartwatch is 11.7 mm thick.
    13.65 mm vs 11.7 mm
  • 5.1% lower list score
    List score
    7.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
    How we count it
    Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
    Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
    Lists with this model (1)
    List score: in 1 of 120 lists (1%)
    7.5 vs 7.9
  • No voice feedback
    This smartwatch does not support voice feedback, the average smartwatch does. 63.5% of smartwatches support voice feedback.
  • 5.1% lower list score
    List score
    7.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
    How we count it
    Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
    Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
    Lists with this model (1)
    List score: in 1 of 120 lists (1%)
    7.5 vs 7.9
  • No voice feedback
    This smartwatch does not support voice feedback, the average smartwatch does. 63.5% of smartwatches support voice feedback.
  • 21.5 g heavier
    This smartwatch is heavier than the average smartwatch (66.5 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    66.5 g vs 45.0 g
  • 1.95 mm thicker
    This smartwatch is thicker than the average smartwatch (13.7 mm vs 11.7 mm). The average smartwatch is 11.7 mm thick.
    13.65 mm vs 11.7 mm
  • 4.6 mm wider case
    This smartwatch has a wider case than the average smartwatch (47.1 mm vs 42.5 mm). The average smartwatch measures 42.5 mm across.
    47.1 mm vs 42.5 mm
  • 2.1 mm taller case
    This smartwatch has a taller case than the average smartwatch (47.1 mm vs 45 mm). The average smartwatch is 45.0 mm tall.
    47.1 mm vs 45.0 mm
  • 0.01 inch smaller display
    This smartwatch has a smaller screen than the average smartwatch (1.4 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch has a 1.4 inch screen.
    1.39 inch vs 1.4 inch
  • No voice assistant
    This smartwatch does not support voice assistants, the average smartwatch does. 69.2% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
  • No voice command support
    This smartwatch does not support voice commands, the average smartwatch does. 68.1% of smartwatches support voice commands.
  • No speaker
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.7% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.
  • 1 fewer microphones
    This smartwatch has fewer microphones than the average smartwatch (0 vs 1). The average smartwatch has 1 microphones.
    0 vs 1

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
Techsquare
≈ estimated
22/06/2025
Long-term test · almost a year of daily use
Verdict
Amazfit T-Rex 2 still wins over active users, with great battery life, but it is weak on smart features like calls and apps.
9.5
Insane Runners
≈ estimated
16/05/2024
Running test · GPS and heart rate against a Garmin
Verdict
Amazfit T-Rex 2 delivers accurate GPS and heart rate for runners at a budget price, beating pricier smartwatches.
8.0
ALL ADVENTURES CHANNEL
≈ estimated
04/07/2023
Hands-on review · mountain biking and swimming use
Verdict
Amazfit T-Rex 2 is a durable, rugged fitness watch, though Bluetooth drops, text replies and workout heart rate still need improving.
9.0
Ryan IWK
≈ estimated
13/11/2022
Full review · features, sensors and app tests
Verdict
Amazfit T-Rex 2 is a favorite for its features and accurate sensors, though some messaging notifications fail on iPhone.
8.0
Matt LeGrand
≈ estimated
12/08/2022
Full test · multi-band GPS, swimming, cycling and running
Verdict
Amazfit T-Rex 2 is strong value for running at this price, but its GPS accuracy, heart rate and accessory limits are real drawbacks.
9.0
The Run Testers
≈ estimated
11/08/2022
Hands-on review · running test and battery life
Verdict
Amazfit T-Rex 2 is a better running watch than earlier T-Rex models and well worth it at this price.
9.0
TechMishka
≈ estimated
28/07/2022
Full review · three weeks of use · app and sensor tests
Verdict
Amazfit T-Rex 2 exceeded expectations for athletes, a strong rugged smartwatch that lacks a speaker, microphone and assistant.
8.0
Peter Herget & Gadgets Anonymous
≈ estimated
26/07/2022
Long-term test · 39 days of daily use
Verdict
Amazfit T-Rex 2 is a good watch, nearly great, with strong battery life, but its heart rate accuracy still needs work.
7.0
R82Xplor
≈ estimated
06/07/2022
Hands-on review · navigation, GPS, watch bands and screen
Verdict
Amazfit T-Rex 2 is fine for workouts at this price, but missing navigation, proprietary straps and GPS accuracy hold it back.
9.0
TrendGrnd
≈ estimated
05/07/2022
Hands-on review · one week of daily use
Verdict
Amazfit T-Rex 2 is easy to recommend as a daily smartwatch, though some features must be set up by hand in the app.
9.0
Tech Singh
≈ estimated
03/07/2022
Unboxing and review · health tracking and battery tests
Verdict
Amazfit T-Rex 2 is a solid fitness and health watch with strong readings and battery life, though calls and replies are missing.
9.0
The Product Reviewer
≈ estimated
02/07/2022
Hands-on review · GPS accuracy, battery and health tracking
Verdict
Amazfit T-Rex 2 is a top outdoor GPS smartwatch for its price, with minor cons on sharp turns and sleep comfort.
More graded video reviews (9)
creator’s own scoreestimated by us

What reviewers agree on

Based on 6 · 12

Reviewers agree on reliable GPS and excellent battery life, but calls and notifications are weak and comfort falls short.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

9.0
notebookcheck.net
≈ estimated
11/02/2023
Lab test · Rugged sport watch
Verdict
The Amazfit T-Rex 2 is a rugged watch with reliable GPS and accurate oxygen readings, best for outdoor workouts, but it cannot make calls or use a voice assistant.
8.1
mbreviews.com
✓ explicit
10/02/2023
One-month test · Rugged smartwatch
Verdict
The Amazfit T-Rex 2 is a tough plastic watch that suits outdoor and industrial work, but its battery needed two charges in one month.
9.0
fitnessmodern.de
≈ estimated
20/05/2023
Hands-on test · GPS outdoor watch
Verdict
The Amazfit T-Rex 2 is a sturdy GPS outdoor watch that guides you along imported routes, but without full maps it suits route-followers more than off-road explorers.
9.0
hwupgrade.it
≈ estimated
Not Dated
Hands-on test · Rugged smartwatch
Verdict
The Amazfit T-Rex 2 is a tough outdoor watch that pairs well with Android and iOS, but its heart and oxygen readings are not medical-grade.
9.0
hardloopzone.nl
≈ estimated
Not Dated
Hands-on test · Sports watch
Verdict
The Amazfit T-Rex 2 is a G-Shock-style sports watch that tracks naps well and lasts about two weeks with daily workouts, though it is bulky.
9.0
notebookcheck.nl
≈ estimated
12/02/2023
Lab test · Sensor comparison
Verdict
The Amazfit T-Rex 2 gives accurate heart-rate and GPS data, but its screen is less bright than advertised and it has no voice control or custom replies.

Third-party reviews

What we like about Amazfit T-Rex 2

  • Battery is rated at 24 days, and training mode runs for 50 h.
  • Water-resistant to 100 m, enough for swimming.
  • Dual-frequency GPS locks on quickly and stays accurate on bike rides.
  • Operating down to -30 °C suits cold winter walks.
  • Heart rate tracking comes close to a chest strap.
  • Smart alarm wakes you during light sleep, within a 30-minute window.

What we don't like about Amazfit T-Rex 2

  • At 66.5 g and 47.1 mm wide, it is heavy for smaller wrists.
  • No speaker or microphone, so no calls or voice assistant.
  • Maps are limited to a route line and arrows, with no full offline maps.
  • Routes must be imported through the Zepp app, which is fiddly.
  • Charging cables from other brands do not work with it.

Verdict

Someone who swims, hikes and wants a simple watch will find the Amazfit T-Rex 2 easy to live with. The battery is rated at 24 days, and in training mode it runs for 50 h. The watch is water-resistant to 100 m, enough for swimming, and it has dual-frequency GPS for accurate routes. The minimum operating temperature of -30 °C makes it useful on cold winter walks. It counts 150 exercise modes and tracks sleep and blood oxygen. The downsides are size and extras: at 66.5 g and 47.1 mm wide it is heavy for smaller wrists, and there is no speaker or microphone. Maps are limited to a route line and arrows, not full offline maps. It fits someone who wants a tough, long-lasting watch for training and does not need voice or calls.

Compare Amazfit T-Rex 2 with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Amazfit T-Rex 2 and other Smartwatches

No results found