OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Drones Methodology v2.0
Drones Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Drones Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 1,110 independent expert reviews and 2,622 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Drones Methodology v2.0

Ameta S20 Pro Review | 97 Data compared

Avg. price:~£110Max flight time:25 minVideo resolution:4KMax transmission distance:0.3 km

Ameta S20 Pro Review: Compare 97 technical specifications and 9 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Drones category and whether it is worth buying.

6.0

Overall score

Score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the drone's quality, based on technical analyses and grades from independent expert reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best drones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Score components

75%

5.6

Technical Score

25%

6.9

Review score ( 0 · 9)

Based on 9 video reviews
Experts count the full 25% of the overall score, because this model has at least 3 full tests. The technical score makes up the other 75%. A video review counts half as much as a written full test.
â–¼Worse than 61% of drones
5.6

Technical Score

Technical score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the drone's technical performance, covering key areas such as flight performance, camera quality, transmission, safety features, battery life, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare drones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Score components

26%

3.1

Flight

24%

5.8

Camera

20%

6.7

Safety

16%

5.8

Connectivity

14%

8.1

Battery & Design

â–¼Worse than 65% of drones
6.9

Review score

Review score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, first looks half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: The review score is 25% of the overall score with 3+ full tests, less with fewer.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
Grades by review (9)
9 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in this model’s overall score: 25%.
Video reviews 8

14.3%

8.0

Toronto RC

14.3%

7.0

Couch Potato Cafe

14.3%

7.0

JayTee RC

14.3%

6.0

Canadian Trucker Couple

7.1%

8.0

TechGuru Andrew

7.1%

7.0

AlToneRC-RTR

7.1%

6.0

ZenBein

7.1%

6.0

Jay Drone

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 69% of drones
  • ameta-s20-pro
  • ameta-s20-pro
  • ameta-s20-pro
  • ameta-s20-pro
  • ameta-s20-pro
  • ameta-s20-pro
  • ameta-s20-pro
  • ameta-s20-pro
  • ameta-s20-pro
ameta-s20-pro
ameta-s20-pro
ameta-s20-pro
ameta-s20-pro
ameta-s20-pro
ameta-s20-pro
ameta-s20-pro
ameta-s20-pro
ameta-s20-pro

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of drone Ameta S20 Pro

Technical Score
Technical score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the drone's technical performance, covering key areas such as flight performance, camera quality, transmission, safety features, battery life, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare drones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Score components:

26%

3.1

Flight

24%

5.8

Camera

20%

6.7

Safety

16%

5.8

Connectivity

14%

8.1

Battery & Design

5.6
Review score
Review score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, first looks half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: The review score is 25% of the overall score with 3+ full tests, less with fewer.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
Grades by review (9)
9 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in this model’s overall score: 25%.
Video reviews 8

14.3%

8.0

Toronto RC

14.3%

7.0

Couch Potato Cafe

14.3%

7.0

JayTee RC

14.3%

6.0

Canadian Trucker Couple

7.1%

8.0

TechGuru Andrew

7.1%

7.0

AlToneRC-RTR

7.1%

6.0

ZenBein

7.1%

6.0

Jay Drone

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
6.9
Popularity
Popularity
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the drone.
When it matters
When you prefer to choose a drone reviewed and selected by many other buyers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 63% of models
Popularity:
Ameta S20 Pro has a popularity score of 7.5 points, which is higher than that of 62.9% of products in this category.
7.5
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the drone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a drone with a good balance between flight quality, camera features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 53% of models
Score components:

60%

6.0

Overall score

40%

9.9

Price

7.1
Max flight time
25 min
Max flight time
25 min
â–² Better than 55% of models
Market range: <8 min – >40 min
This drone has a max flight time of 25 min, longer than 54.5% of drones and equal to 4.5% of drones.
Max flight distance
0.3 km
Max flight distance
0.3 km
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Market range: <0.05 km – >24 km
This drone has a max flight distance of 0.3 km, shorter-range than 65.2% of drones and equal to 6.1% of drones.
Max flight speed
5 m/s
Max flight speed
5 m/s
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Market range: <4 m/s – >21 m/s
This drone has a max flight speed of 5 m/s, slower than 77.9% of drones and equal to 10.1% of drones.
Max wind resistance
2 m/s
Max wind resistance
2 m/s
â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
Market range: <3.3 m/s – >12 m/s
This drone has max wind resistance of 2 m/s, lower than 97.1% of drones and equal to 2.2% of drones.
Max service ceiling (ASL)
3,000 m
Max service ceiling (ASL)
3,000 m
â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
Market range: <120 m – >6k m
This drone has a max service ceiling of 3,000 m, lower than 51.5% of drones and equal to 6.7% of drones.
Show more
Video resolution
4K
Video resolution
4K
â–² Better than 46% of models
This drone records video at 4K, higher than 45.5% of drones and equal to 10.4% of drones.
4K camera
yes
4K camera
yes
â–² Better than 46% of models
This drone supports 4K video. 46% of drones support 4K video.
Sensor size
?
Main camera megapixels
13 MP
Main camera megapixels
13 MP
â–² Better than 62% of models
Market range: <2 MP – >48 MP
This drone has a main camera resolution of 13 MP, higher than 62% of drones.
Max movie bitrate
?
Show more
Obstacle detection
no
Obstacle detection
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This drone does not support obstacle detection. 31% of drones support obstacle detection.
Return to Home (RTH)
yes
Return to Home (RTH)
yes
â–² Better than 33% of models
This drone supports Return-to-Home (RTH). 33% of drones support Return-to-Home (RTH).
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
â–² Better than 35% of models
This drone supports GPS. 35.3% of drones support GPS.
GNSS systems supported
none
GNSS systems supported
none
â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
This drone supports none GNSS systems, which are less comprehensive than those of 65.8% and the same as those of 34.2%.
Obstacle sensing directions
N/A
Show more
Max transmission distance
0.3 km
Max transmission distance
0.3 km
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Market range: <0.05 km – >15 km
This drone has a max transmission distance of 0.3 km, shorter-range than 62.2% of drones and equal to 6.1% of drones.
Transmission latency
?
Video transmission system
Wi-Fi
Video transmission system
Wi-Fi
â–¼ Worse than 44% of models
This drone uses Wi-Fi for video transmission, which is more advanced than the system used by 8.2% and the same as that used by 47.7%.
Live view quality
720p@30 fps
Live view quality
720p@30 fps
â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
This drone offers live view quality of 720p@30 fps, lower-quality than 56.8% of drones and equal to 22.9% of drones.
Remote control
yes
Remote control
yes
â–² Better than 5% of models
This drone has a handheld remote controller. 5% of drones offer this.
Show more
Battery capacity
3,000 mAh
Battery capacity
3,000 mAh
â–² Better than 73% of models
Market range: <550 mAh – >5k mAh
This drone has a battery capacity of 3,000 mAh, larger than 72.5% of drones and equal to 2.1% of drones.
Battery energy
?
Charging time
?
Weight
181 g
Weight
181 g
â–² Better than 65% of models
Market range: <80 g – >920 g
This drone weighs 181 g, lighter than 65.5% of drones and equal to 0.5% of drones.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This drone has a removable battery. 0.5% of drones have a removable battery.
Show more

Ameta S20 Pro vs the average drone

246810TotalFlightCameraSafetyConnectivityBattery & Design
  • More modern charging port
    Charging interface
    USB-C
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This drone uses USB-C for charging, while the average drone uses micro-USB.
    USB-C vs micro-USB
  • Supports waypoint flight
    Waypoint flight
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This drone supports waypoint flight, while the average drone does not.
  • Supports TapFly
    TapFly
    yes
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This drone supports TapFly, while the average drone does not.
  • Supports smartphone control
    Smartphone control
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This drone supports smartphone control, while the average drone does not.
  • 800 mAh more battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    3,000 mAh
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    Market range: <550 mAh – >5k mAh
    This drone has a larger battery capacity than the average drone (3000 mAh vs 2200 mAh). The average drone battery has a capacity of 2200 mAh.
    3,000 mAh vs 2,200 mAh
  • 5 min longer flight time
    Max flight time
    25 min
    â–² Better than 55% of models
    Market range: <8 min – >40 min
    This drone offers longer max flight time than the average drone (25 min vs 20 min). The average drone offers 20 min of max flight time.
    25 min vs 20 min
  • 2 years newer release date
    Release date
    2025
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This drone is newer than the average drone (2025 vs 2023). The average drone was released in 2023.
    2025 vs 2023
  • 26.4% lower weight
    Weight
    181 g
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    Market range: <80 g – >920 g
    This drone is lighter than the average drone (181 g vs 246 g). The average drone weighs 246 g.
    181 g vs 246 g
  • 5 min longer flight time
    Max flight time
    25 min
    â–² Better than 55% of models
    Market range: <8 min – >40 min
    This drone offers longer max flight time than the average drone (25 min vs 20 min). The average drone offers 20 min of max flight time.
    25 min vs 20 min
  • 2 years newer release date
    Release date
    2025
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This drone is newer than the average drone (2025 vs 2023). The average drone was released in 2023.
    2025 vs 2023
  • Supports burst mode
    Burst mode
    yes
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This drone supports burst mode, while the average drone does not.
  • Supports panorama mode
    Panorama mode
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This drone supports panorama mode, while the average drone does not.
  • Supports waypoint flight
    Waypoint flight
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This drone supports waypoint flight, while the average drone does not.
  • Supports TapFly
    TapFly
    yes
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This drone supports TapFly, while the average drone does not.
  • Supports smartphone control
    Smartphone control
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This drone supports smartphone control, while the average drone does not.
  • More modern charging port
    Charging interface
    USB-C
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This drone uses USB-C for charging, while the average drone uses micro-USB.
    USB-C vs micro-USB
  • 800 mAh more battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    3,000 mAh
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    Market range: <550 mAh – >5k mAh
    This drone has a larger battery capacity than the average drone (3000 mAh vs 2200 mAh). The average drone battery has a capacity of 2200 mAh.
    3,000 mAh vs 2,200 mAh
  • 26.4% lower weight
    Weight
    181 g
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    Market range: <80 g – >920 g
    This drone is lighter than the average drone (181 g vs 246 g). The average drone weighs 246 g.
    181 g vs 246 g
  • 12.5 mm lower body height
    Height
    50 mm
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <38 mm – >120 mm
    This drone is shorter than the average drone (50 mm vs 62.5 mm). The average drone is 62.5 mm tall.
    50 mm vs 62.5 mm
  • 8.7 m/s lower wind resistance
    Max wind resistance
    2 m/s
    â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
    Market range: <3.3 m/s – >12 m/s
    This drone handles weaker wind than the average drone (2 m/s vs 10.7 m/s). The average drone handles wind up to 10.7 m/s.
    2 m/s vs 10.7 m/s
  • Fewer GNSS systems
    GNSS systems supported
    none
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    This drone supports none GNSS systems, while the average drone supports GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou.
    none vs GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou
  • More basic transmission system
    Video transmission system
    Wi-Fi
    â–¼ Worse than 44% of models
    This drone uses Wi-Fi for video transmission, while the average drone uses SkyLink 2.0.
    Wi-Fi vs SkyLink 2.0
  • Lower video resolution
    Video resolution
    4K
    â–² Better than 46% of models
    This drone offers lower video resolution than the average drone (4K vs 4K/100 fps). The average drone offers a video resolution of 4K/100 fps.
    4K vs 4K/100 fps
  • 10 m/s slower flight speed
    Max flight speed
    5 m/s
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <4 m/s – >21 m/s
    This drone reaches a lower max flight speed than the average drone (5 m/s vs 15 m/s). The average drone reaches 15 m/s.
    5 m/s vs 15 m/s
  • Fewer photo format options
    Photo formats supported
    JPEG
    â–¼ Worse than 41% of models
    This drone supports JPEG photo formats, while the average drone supports JPEG, DNG (RAW).
    JPEG vs JPEG, DNG (RAW)
  • 3 fewer flight modes
    N. of intelligent flight modes
    1
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    Market range: <0 – >8
    This drone offers fewer intelligent flight modes than the average drone (1 vs 4). The average drone offers 4 intelligent flight modes.
    1 vs 4
  • 0.2 m worse hover accuracy
    Hover accuracy (horizontal)
    0.5 m
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <0.3 m – >1.4 m
    This drone has worse horizontal hover accuracy than the average drone (0.5 m vs 0.3 m). The average drone has horizontal hover accuracy of 0.3 m.
    0.5 m vs 0.3 m
  • 8.7 m/s lower wind resistance
    Max wind resistance
    2 m/s
    â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
    Market range: <3.3 m/s – >12 m/s
    This drone handles weaker wind than the average drone (2 m/s vs 10.7 m/s). The average drone handles wind up to 10.7 m/s.
    2 m/s vs 10.7 m/s
  • 10 m/s slower flight speed
    Max flight speed
    5 m/s
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <4 m/s – >21 m/s
    This drone reaches a lower max flight speed than the average drone (5 m/s vs 15 m/s). The average drone reaches 15 m/s.
    5 m/s vs 15 m/s
  • 2 m/s slower descent speed
    Max descent speed
    2 m/s
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    Market range: <2 m/s – >8 m/s
    This drone descends more slowly than the average drone (2 m/s vs 4 m/s). The average drone descends at 4 m/s.
    2 m/s vs 4 m/s
  • 2 m/s slower ascent speed
    Max ascent speed
    3 m/s
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <3 m/s – >8 m/s
    This drone climbs more slowly than the average drone (3 m/s vs 5 m/s). The average drone climbs at 5 m/s.
    3 m/s vs 5 m/s
  • 0.7 km shorter flight distance
    Max flight distance
    0.3 km
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <0.05 km – >24 km
    This drone has a shorter max flight distance than the average drone (0.3 km vs 1 km). The average drone can fly up to 1 km.
    0.3 km vs 1 km
  • 500 m lower service ceiling
    Max service ceiling (ASL)
    3,000 m
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    Market range: <120 m – >6k m
    This drone can fly at a lower max service ceiling than the average drone (3000 m vs 3500 m). The average drone reaches 3500 m.
    3,000 m vs 3,500 m
  • Lower video resolution
    Video resolution
    4K
    â–² Better than 46% of models
    This drone offers lower video resolution than the average drone (4K vs 4K/100 fps). The average drone offers a video resolution of 4K/100 fps.
    4K vs 4K/100 fps
  • Fewer photo format options
    Photo formats supported
    JPEG
    â–¼ Worse than 41% of models
    This drone supports JPEG photo formats, while the average drone supports JPEG, DNG (RAW).
    JPEG vs JPEG, DNG (RAW)
  • More basic stabilization
    Image stabilization type
    None (Fixed)
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This drone uses None (Fixed) image stabilization, while the average drone uses EIS (Digital).
    None (Fixed) vs EIS (Digital)
  • Narrower tilt range
    Camera tilt range
    -90 to 0 °
    â–¼ Worse than 33% of models
    This drone has a narrower tilt range than the average drone (-90 to 0 ° vs -90 to 20 °).
    -90 to 0 ° vs -90 to 20 °
  • 12 ° narrower field of view
    Field of view
    78 °
    â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
    Market range: <79 ° – >130 °
    This drone has a narrower field of view than the average drone (78 ° vs 90 °). The average drone has a field of view of 90 °.
    78 ° vs 90 °
  • Fewer GNSS systems
    GNSS systems supported
    none
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    This drone supports none GNSS systems, while the average drone supports GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou.
    none vs GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou
  • 3 fewer flight modes
    N. of intelligent flight modes
    1
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    Market range: <0 – >8
    This drone offers fewer intelligent flight modes than the average drone (1 vs 4). The average drone offers 4 intelligent flight modes.
    1 vs 4
  • 0.2 m worse hover accuracy
    Hover accuracy (horizontal)
    0.5 m
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <0.3 m – >1.4 m
    This drone has worse horizontal hover accuracy than the average drone (0.5 m vs 0.3 m). The average drone has horizontal hover accuracy of 0.3 m.
    0.5 m vs 0.3 m
  • No beginner mode
    Beginner mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This drone does not support beginner mode, while the average drone does.
  • 27.3% higher takeoff weight
    Max takeoff weight
    181 g
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    Market range: <80 g – >1.1k g
    This drone has a higher max takeoff weight than the average drone (181 g vs 249 g). The average drone has a max takeoff weight of 249 g.
    181 g vs 249 g
  • More basic transmission system
    Video transmission system
    Wi-Fi
    â–¼ Worse than 44% of models
    This drone uses Wi-Fi for video transmission, while the average drone uses SkyLink 2.0.
    Wi-Fi vs SkyLink 2.0
  • Lower live view quality
    Live view quality
    720p@30 fps
    â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
    This drone has worse live view quality than the average drone (720p@30 fps vs 1080p@25 fps). The average drone offers live view quality of 1080p@25 fps.
    720p@30 fps vs 1080p@25 fps
  • Basic companion app
    Companion app
    AMETA Drone
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    This drone uses the AMETA Drone companion app, while the average drone uses HS FPV.
    AMETA Drone vs HS FPV
  • 0.7 km shorter transmission range
    Max transmission distance
    0.3 km
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    Market range: <0.05 km – >15 km
    This drone has a shorter max transmission distance than the average drone (0.3 km vs 1 km). The average drone reaches 1 km of transmission distance.
    0.3 km vs 1 km
  • 55 mm longer body length
    Length
    330 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <117 mm – >385 mm
    This drone is longer than the average drone (330 mm vs 275 mm). The average drone is 275 mm long.
    330 mm vs 275 mm
  • 39 mm wider width
    Width
    280 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    Market range: <114 mm – >387.5 mm
    This drone is wider than the average drone (280 mm vs 241 mm). The average drone width is 241 mm.
    280 mm vs 241 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

6.0
Canadian Trucker Couple
≈ estimated
19/12/2025
Unboxing and full review · flights, return-to-home and features
Verdict
Ameta S20 Pro is fine for adults who want cheap practice flying, but its obstacle sensing and landing are weak.
7.0
Couch Potato Cafe
≈ estimated
27/09/2025
Hands-on review · flights, camera and return-to-home tests
Verdict
Ameta S20 Pro is a solid, low-risk starter drone for complete beginners, not one for cinematic video.
7.0
JayTee RC
≈ estimated
16/09/2025
Hands-on review · flight, speed and camera tests
Verdict
Ameta S20 Pro is a decent drone for the price, with a few camera and close-flying drawbacks.
8.0
Toronto RC
≈ estimated
31/08/2025
Hands-on flight test · GPS modes and return to home
Verdict
Ameta S20 Pro is a good beginner GPS drone that performed well in its smart flight modes.
8.0
TechGuru Andrew
≈ estimated
29/03/2026
Unboxing and feature walkthrough · beginner recommendation
Verdict
Ameta S20 Pro is a good first drone for beginners, thanks to its reliable GPS.
7.0
AlToneRC-RTR
≈ estimated
13/12/2025
First impressions · unboxing and features, no flight yet
Verdict
Ameta S20 Pro looks like a strong beginner choice, though it has not been flown yet.
6.0
ZenBein
≈ estimated
13/12/2025
Unboxing · first look at kit and controller, flight to follow
Verdict
Ameta S20 Pro offers good value for the price, though the controller feels cheap and flight testing is still to come.
6.0
Jay Drone
≈ estimated
22/08/2025
Quick look · unboxing and controller overview
Verdict
Ameta S20 Pro is a beginner's drone, not a DJI rival, but it is easy to learn on.
Brand video

Third-party reviews

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Ameta S20 Pro

  • 13 MP camera with 4K recording
  • About 25 minutes from a 3000 mAh battery
  • GPS return-to-home, follow-me and waypoints
  • Light 181 g foldable frame
  • Brushless motors for steady flight

What we don't like about Ameta S20 Pro

  • No gimbal, so video shakes
  • Short Wi-Fi range of about 300 m
  • Not suited to long-distance flights
  • Only modest gains over the cheaper S20

Verdict

The Ameta S20 Pro builds on the standard S20 with a 13 MP camera and a slightly lighter 181 g frame, while keeping the long-flight formula that made the original popular. Its 3000 mAh battery is rated for about 25 minutes per flight, and brushless motors give steady, durable performance. GPS supports return-to-home, follow-me tracking and waypoint missions, which helps beginners fly outdoors with more confidence. The camera records 4K, but there is no gimbal, so footage shakes in wind or on fast turns. Video and control run over Wi-Fi with a range of about 300 m, which is fine for parks and fields but not for long-distance flights. Its weight keeps it well under 250 g. For buyers who want GPS features and long battery life with slightly better photos than the base model, it is a good-value choice.

Compare Ameta S20 Pro with other drones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Ameta S20 Pro and other drones

No results found