OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Drones Methodology v2.0
Drones Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Drones Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 1,110 independent expert reviews and 2,622 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Drones Methodology v2.0

BETAFPV Air75 II Review | 97 Data compared

Avg. price:~£110Max flight time:7.5 minVideo resolution:N/AMax transmission distance:?

BETAFPV Air75 II Review: Compare 97 technical specifications and 11 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Drones category and whether it is worth buying.

6.3

Overall score

Score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the drone's quality, based on technical analyses and grades from independent expert reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best drones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 51% of models
Score components

75%

5.7

Technical Score

25%

8.0

Review score ( 0 · 11)

Based on 11 video reviews
Experts count the full 25% of the overall score, because this model has at least 3 full tests. The technical score makes up the other 75%. A video review counts half as much as a written full test.
â–²Better than 51% of drones
5.7

Technical Score

Technical score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the drone's technical performance, covering key areas such as flight performance, camera quality, transmission, safety features, battery life, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare drones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Score components

26%

6.1

Flight

24%

5.6

Camera

20%

4.0

Safety

16%

6.1

Connectivity

14%

7.3

Battery & Design

â–¼Worse than 61% of drones
8.0

Review score

Review score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, first looks half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: The review score is 25% of the overall score with 3+ full tests, less with fewer.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 84% of models
Grades by review (11)
11 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in this model’s overall score: 25%.
Video reviews 8

10.5%

9.0

AndyRC

10.5%

9.0

Half Chrome

10.5%

8.0

FPVwine

10.5%

8.0

DRONE PH

10.5%

8.0

Mangorille

10.5%

7.0

MrHappeFPV

5.3%

8.0

CertifyFPV

5.3%

8.0

Squadding Quads

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
â–²Better than 84% of drones
  • betafpv-air75-ii
  • betafpv-air75-ii
  • betafpv-air75-ii
  • betafpv-air75-ii
  • betafpv-air75-ii
  • betafpv-air75-ii
  • betafpv-air75-ii
  • betafpv-air75-ii
  • betafpv-air75-ii
betafpv-air75-ii
betafpv-air75-ii
betafpv-air75-ii
betafpv-air75-ii
betafpv-air75-ii
betafpv-air75-ii
betafpv-air75-ii
betafpv-air75-ii
betafpv-air75-ii

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of drone BETAFPV Air75 II

Technical Score
Technical score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the drone's technical performance, covering key areas such as flight performance, camera quality, transmission, safety features, battery life, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare drones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Score components:

26%

6.1

Flight

24%

5.6

Camera

20%

4.0

Safety

16%

6.1

Connectivity

14%

7.3

Battery & Design

5.7
Review score
Review score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, first looks half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: The review score is 25% of the overall score with 3+ full tests, less with fewer.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 84% of models
Grades by review (11)
11 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in this model’s overall score: 25%.
Video reviews 8

10.5%

9.0

AndyRC

10.5%

9.0

Half Chrome

10.5%

8.0

FPVwine

10.5%

8.0

DRONE PH

10.5%

8.0

Mangorille

10.5%

7.0

MrHappeFPV

5.3%

8.0

CertifyFPV

5.3%

8.0

Squadding Quads

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
8.0
Popularity
Popularity
4.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the drone.
When it matters
When you prefer to choose a drone reviewed and selected by many other buyers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Popularity:
BETAFPV Air75 II has a popularity score of 4.8 points, which is lower than that of 60.4% of products in this category.
4.8
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the drone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a drone with a good balance between flight quality, camera features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 71% of models
Score components:

60%

6.3

Overall score

40%

9.9

Price

7.4
Max flight time
7.5 min
Max flight time
7.5 min
â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
Market range: <8 min – >40 min
This drone has a max flight time of 7.5 min, shorter than 91.5% of drones.
Max flight distance
?
Max flight speed
?
Max wind resistance
?
Max service ceiling (ASL)
?
Show more
Video resolution
N/A
4K camera
no
4K camera
no
â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
This drone does not support 4K video. 54.6% of drones support 4K video.
Sensor size
?
Main camera megapixels
N/A
Max movie bitrate
?
Show more
Obstacle detection
no
Obstacle detection
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This drone does not support obstacle detection. 31% of drones support obstacle detection.
Return to Home (RTH)
no
Return to Home (RTH)
no
â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
This drone does not support Return-to-Home (RTH). 67.5% of drones support Return-to-Home (RTH).
GPS
no
GPS
no
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
This drone does not support GPS. 65.2% of drones support GPS.
GNSS systems supported
none
GNSS systems supported
none
â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
This drone supports none GNSS systems, which are less comprehensive than those of 65.8% and the same as those of 34.2%.
Obstacle sensing directions
N/A
Show more
Max transmission distance
?
Transmission latency
?
Video transmission system
Analog
Video transmission system
Analog
â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
This drone uses Analog for video transmission, which is less advanced than the system used by 92.3% and the same as that used by 3.1%.
Live view quality
?
Remote control
no
Remote control
no
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
This drone does not have a handheld remote controller. 95.5% of drones offer this.
Show more
Battery capacity
480 mAh
Battery capacity
480 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
Market range: <550 mAh – >5k mAh
This drone has a battery capacity of 480 mAh, smaller than 92.2% of drones.
Battery energy
?
Charging time
?
Weight
20.9 g
Weight
20.9 g
★ Better than 99% of models
Market range: <80 g – >920 g
This drone weighs 20.9 g, lighter than 99.5% of drones.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This drone has a removable battery. 0.5% of drones have a removable battery.
Show more

BETAFPV Air75 II vs the average drone

246810TotalFlightCameraSafetyConnectivityBattery & Design
  • 91.5% lower weight
    Weight
    20.9 g
    ★ Better than 99% of models
    Market range: <80 g – >920 g
    This drone is lighter than the average drone (20.9 g vs 246 g). The average drone weighs 246 g.
    20.9 g vs 246 g
  • Includes propeller guards
    Propeller guards
    yes
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    This drone has propeller guards, while the average drone does not. 33.3% of drones offer them.
  • FPV camera
    FPV camera
    yes
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    This drone has an FPV camera, while the average drone does not.
  • 161 mm shorter body length
    Length
    114 mm
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <117 mm – >385 mm
    This drone is shorter than the average drone (114 mm vs 275 mm). The average drone is 275 mm long.
    114 mm vs 275 mm
  • 127 mm narrower width
    Width
    114 mm
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    Market range: <114 mm – >387.5 mm
    This drone is narrower than the average drone (114 mm vs 241 mm). The average drone width is 241 mm.
    114 mm vs 241 mm
  • 3 years newer release date
    Release date
    2026
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This drone is newer than the average drone (2026 vs 2023). The average drone was released in 2023.
    2026 vs 2023
  • More modern charging port
    Charging interface
    proprietary
    â–¼ Worse than 42% of models
    This drone uses proprietary for charging, while the average drone uses micro-USB.
    proprietary vs micro-USB
  • 3 years newer release date
    Release date
    2026
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This drone is newer than the average drone (2026 vs 2023). The average drone was released in 2023.
    2026 vs 2023
  • FPV camera
    FPV camera
    yes
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    This drone has an FPV camera, while the average drone does not.
  • Includes propeller guards
    Propeller guards
    yes
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    This drone has propeller guards, while the average drone does not. 33.3% of drones offer them.
  • 91.5% lower weight
    Weight
    20.9 g
    ★ Better than 99% of models
    Market range: <80 g – >920 g
    This drone is lighter than the average drone (20.9 g vs 246 g). The average drone weighs 246 g.
    20.9 g vs 246 g
  • 161 mm shorter body length
    Length
    114 mm
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <117 mm – >385 mm
    This drone is shorter than the average drone (114 mm vs 275 mm). The average drone is 275 mm long.
    114 mm vs 275 mm
  • 127 mm narrower width
    Width
    114 mm
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    Market range: <114 mm – >387.5 mm
    This drone is narrower than the average drone (114 mm vs 241 mm). The average drone width is 241 mm.
    114 mm vs 241 mm
  • More modern charging port
    Charging interface
    proprietary
    â–¼ Worse than 42% of models
    This drone uses proprietary for charging, while the average drone uses micro-USB.
    proprietary vs micro-USB
  • Fewer GNSS systems
    GNSS systems supported
    none
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    This drone supports none GNSS systems, while the average drone supports GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou.
    none vs GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou
  • More basic transmission system
    Video transmission system
    Analog
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    This drone uses Analog for video transmission, while the average drone uses SkyLink 2.0.
    Analog vs SkyLink 2.0
  • 12.5 min shorter flight time
    Max flight time
    7.5 min
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <8 min – >40 min
    This drone offers shorter max flight time than the average drone (7.5 min vs 20 min). The average drone offers 20 min of max flight time.
    7.5 min vs 20 min
  • No subject tracking
    Subject tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This drone cannot track subjects, while the average drone can.
  • No return-to-home (RTH)
    Return to Home (RTH)
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This drone does not support return-to-home (RTH), while the average drone does.
  • No GPS
    GPS
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    This drone does not have GPS, while the average drone does.
  • 1,720 mAh less battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    480 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <550 mAh – >5k mAh
    This drone has a smaller battery capacity than the average drone (480 mAh vs 2200 mAh). The average drone battery has a capacity of 2200 mAh.
    480 mAh vs 2,200 mAh
  • Fewer photo format options
    Photo formats supported
    none
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    This drone supports none photo formats, while the average drone supports JPEG, DNG (RAW).
    none vs JPEG, DNG (RAW)
  • 12.5 min shorter flight time
    Max flight time
    7.5 min
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <8 min – >40 min
    This drone offers shorter max flight time than the average drone (7.5 min vs 20 min). The average drone offers 20 min of max flight time.
    7.5 min vs 20 min
  • Non-foldable design
    Foldable design
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This drone does not have a foldable design, while the average drone does.
  • Fewer photo format options
    Photo formats supported
    none
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    This drone supports none photo formats, while the average drone supports JPEG, DNG (RAW).
    none vs JPEG, DNG (RAW)
  • Narrower tilt range
    Camera tilt range
    manual only °
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    This drone has a narrower tilt range than the average drone (manual only ° vs -90 to 20 °).
    manual only ° vs -90 to 20 °
  • Fewer video codec options
    Video codecs supported
    none
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    This drone supports none video codecs, while the average drone supports H.264/AVC.
    none vs H.264/AVC
  • No memory card slot
    Memory card slot
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    This drone does not have a memory card slot, while the average drone does.
  • Fewer video format options
    Video formats
    none
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    This drone supports none video formats, while the average drone supports MP4.
    none vs MP4
  • 3 x lower digital zoom
    Digital zoom
    0 x
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    Market range: <0 x – >16 x
    This drone offers less digital zoom than the average drone (0 x vs 3 x). The average drone offers 3 x of digital zoom.
    0 x vs 3 x
  • No 4K video
    4K camera
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This drone does not support 4K video, while the average drone does.
  • 128 GB lower memory card limit
    Max external memory supported
    0 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >512 GB
    This drone supports less external storage than the average drone (0 GB vs 128 GB). The average drone supports up to 128 GB of external storage.
    0 GB vs 128 GB
  • Fewer GNSS systems
    GNSS systems supported
    none
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    This drone supports none GNSS systems, while the average drone supports GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou.
    none vs GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou
  • No subject tracking
    Subject tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This drone cannot track subjects, while the average drone can.
  • No return-to-home (RTH)
    Return to Home (RTH)
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This drone does not support return-to-home (RTH), while the average drone does.
  • No GPS
    GPS
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    This drone does not have GPS, while the average drone does.
  • No POI mode
    POI mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    This drone does not support POI mode, while the average drone does.
  • 4 fewer flight modes
    N. of intelligent flight modes
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <0 – >8
    This drone offers fewer intelligent flight modes than the average drone (0 vs 4). The average drone offers 4 intelligent flight modes.
    0 vs 4
  • No compass
    Compass
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This drone does not have a compass, while the average drone does.
  • 86.7% higher takeoff weight
    Max takeoff weight
    33 g
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
    Market range: <80 g – >1.1k g
    This drone has a higher max takeoff weight than the average drone (33 g vs 249 g). The average drone has a max takeoff weight of 249 g.
    33 g vs 249 g
  • No headless mode
    Headless mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This drone does not support headless mode, while the average drone does.
  • No beginner mode
    Beginner mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This drone does not support beginner mode, while the average drone does.
  • No altitude hold
    Altitude hold
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
    This drone does not support altitude hold, while the average drone does.
  • More basic transmission system
    Video transmission system
    Analog
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    This drone uses Analog for video transmission, while the average drone uses SkyLink 2.0.
    Analog vs SkyLink 2.0
  • No handheld remote
    Remote control
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
    This drone does not have a handheld remote controller, while the average drone does. 95.1% of drones offer one.
  • Basic companion app
    Companion app
    None
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    This drone uses the None companion app, while the average drone uses HS FPV.
    None vs HS FPV
  • No wireless file transfer
    Wireless file transfer
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This drone does not support wireless file transfer, while the average drone does.
  • 1,720 mAh less battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    480 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <550 mAh – >5k mAh
    This drone has a smaller battery capacity than the average drone (480 mAh vs 2200 mAh). The average drone battery has a capacity of 2200 mAh.
    480 mAh vs 2,200 mAh

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
FPVwine
≈ estimated
17/06/2026
Hands-on review · windy outdoor flight test
Verdict
BETAFPV Air75 II is fast and handles wind well, and it is easy to recommend.
9.0
AndyRC
≈ estimated
27/05/2026
Hands-on review · range, battery and freestyle flying
Verdict
BETAFPV Air75 II is a freestyle whoop with good power and strong analog range, but batteries drain fast and wind makes gates tricky.
7.0
MrHappeFPV
≈ estimated
11/05/2026
Hands-on review · flights, durability and flight times
Verdict
BETAFPV Air75 II is worth it for intermediate to advanced pilots who can repair fragile builds.
8.0
DRONE PH
≈ estimated
05/05/2026
Hands-on review · unboxing, binding and flight test
Verdict
BETAFPV Air75 II offers impressive speed and performance in a light build, a good pick for beginners learning FPV.
8.0
Mangorille
≈ estimated
07/04/2026
Hands-on review · multi-day flight tests and pit tuning
Verdict
BETAFPV Air75 II impresses straight out of the box, but the camera is the weak point.
9.0
Half Chrome
≈ estimated
28/03/2026
Hands-on review · beginner recommendation and flight footage
Verdict
BETAFPV Air75 II is close to ideal as a first FPV drone for new pilots.
8.0
Squadding Quads
≈ estimated
20/02/2026
Hands-on review · downpour and flight test
Verdict
BETAFPV Air75 II is a good starting point for newcomers, with plenty of power and a lot of fun to fly.
8.0
CertifyFPV
≈ estimated
04/05/2026
Unboxing and review · first impressions of the Champion version
Verdict
BETAFPV Air75 II packs a lot of punch, though beginners should lower the camera angle.
8.0
MrHappeFPV
≈ estimated
25/04/2026
First impressions · first flights and battery tests
Verdict
BETAFPV Air75 II is very fast and a good buy, but the throttle needs some tuning.
8.0
Squadding Quads
≈ estimated
29/03/2026
First flight · maiden flight and initial impressions
Verdict
BETAFPV Air75 II is a smooth, fun freestyle whoop that gives up some power for its intended role.

Third-party reviews

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about BETAFPV Air75 II

  • About 7.5 minutes per 480 mAh battery, long for a whoop
  • Light 20.9 g brushless build
  • Compact Matrix 5-in-1 flight controller
  • Low-latency analog FPV video
  • Ducted design tolerates light crashes

What we don't like about BETAFPV Air75 II

  • No remote included, radio and goggles needed
  • No altitude hold or GPS, not for beginners
  • Analog video is less sharp than digital systems
  • Indoor and calm-weather use only

Verdict

The BETAFPV Air75 II is a lightweight brushless whoop for FPV pilots who want a little more power and flight time than the smallest 65 mm class. It weighs 20.9 g and runs on a 480 mAh battery rated for about 7.5 minutes, which is long for an indoor whoop. Its Matrix 5-in-1 flight controller keeps the build compact, and the ducted design makes it tolerant of light crashes in rooms and gyms. An analog video link delivers the low-latency feed that racers and freestyle pilots prefer. Like its smaller sibling, it is aimed at experienced flyers: there is no altitude hold or GPS, and no remote comes in the box, so you need your own radio and goggles. For FPV pilots who want a fast, nimble micro quad with extra endurance, it is a strong pick.

Compare BETAFPV Air75 II with other drones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of BETAFPV Air75 II and other drones

No results found