OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Drones Methodology v2.0
Drones Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Drones Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 1,023 independent expert reviews and 2,622 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Drones Methodology v2.0

Ameta S20 Lite Review | 97 Data compared

Avg. price:~£70Max flight time:18 minVideo resolution:1080pMax transmission distance:0.2 km

Ameta S20 Lite Review: Compare 97 technical specifications and 24 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Drones category and whether it is worth buying.

5.3

Overall score

Score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the drone's quality, based on technical analyses and grades from independent expert reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best drones on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 84% of models
Score components

85%

4.9

Technical score

15%

7.8

Review score ( 0 · 24)

Review score 15% · 7.8 · based on 24 independent reviews
Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 15%, technical score 85%. This model has enough reviews, so its review score is the weighted average of their grades.
▼Worse than 84% of drones
4.9

Technical score

Technical score
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the drone's technical performance, covering key areas such as flight performance, camera quality, transmission, safety features, battery life, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare drones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 85% of models
Score components

26%

2.5

Flight

24%

5.6

Camera

20%

5.1

Safety

16%

5.9

Connectivity

14%

6.6

Battery & Design

▼Worse than 85% of drones
7.8

Review score

Review score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 15% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 4 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 56% of models
Grades by review (24)
24 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 15%, the same for every model in this category.
Video reviews 10

4.3%

9.0

RC Escape

4.3%

8.0

Eric’s Tech World

4.3%

8.0

Matt Liller

4.3%

8.0

Stephen F Photography

4.3%

8.0

Random Tech

4.3%

8.0

Ready To Run RC

4.3%

7.0

ZenBein

4.3%

7.0

Open Circuit RC & Tech

4.3%

6.0

Gadget Squared

2.2%

9.0

LampoFilm

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
▼Worse than 56% of drones
  • ameta-s20-lite
  • ameta-s20-lite
  • ameta-s20-lite
  • ameta-s20-lite
  • ameta-s20-lite
  • ameta-s20-lite
  • ameta-s20-lite
  • ameta-s20-lite
  • ameta-s20-lite
  • ameta-s20-lite
ameta-s20-lite
ameta-s20-lite
ameta-s20-lite
ameta-s20-lite
ameta-s20-lite
ameta-s20-lite
ameta-s20-lite
ameta-s20-lite
ameta-s20-lite
ameta-s20-lite

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of drone Ameta S20 Lite

Technical score
Technical score
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the drone's technical performance, covering key areas such as flight performance, camera quality, transmission, safety features, battery life, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare drones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 85% of models
Score components:

26%

2.5

Flight

24%

5.6

Camera

20%

5.1

Safety

16%

5.9

Connectivity

14%

6.6

Battery & Design

4.9
Review score
Review score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 15% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 4 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 56% of models
Grades by review (24)
24 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 15%, the same for every model in this category.
Video reviews 10

4.3%

9.0

RC Escape

4.3%

8.0

Eric’s Tech World

4.3%

8.0

Matt Liller

4.3%

8.0

Stephen F Photography

4.3%

8.0

Random Tech

4.3%

8.0

Ready To Run RC

4.3%

7.0

ZenBein

4.3%

7.0

Open Circuit RC & Tech

4.3%

6.0

Gadget Squared

2.2%

9.0

LampoFilm

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
7.8
Popularity
Popularity
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the drone.
When it matters
When you prefer to choose a drone reviewed and selected by many other buyers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 61% of models
Popularity:
Ameta S20 Lite has a popularity score of 7.3 points, which is higher than that of 60.9% of products in this category.
7.3
Value for money
Value for money
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the drone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a drone with a good balance between flight quality, camera features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 76% of models
Score components:

60%

5.3

Overall score

40%

10

Price

6.7
Max flight time
18 min
Max flight time
18 min
▼ Worse than 56% of models
Market range: <8 min – >40 min
This drone has a max flight time of 18 min, shorter than 55.5% of drones and equal to 4.5% of drones.
Max flight distance
0.2 km
Max flight distance
0.2 km
▼ Worse than 72% of models
Market range: <0.05 km – >24 km
This drone has a max flight distance of 0.2 km, shorter-range than 72.4% of drones and equal to 1.1% of drones.
Max flight speed
5 m/s
Max flight speed
5 m/s
▼ Worse than 78% of models
Market range: <4 m/s – >21 m/s
This drone has a max flight speed of 5 m/s, slower than 77.9% of drones and equal to 10.1% of drones.
Max wind resistance
2 m/s
Max wind resistance
2 m/s
▼ Worse than 97% of models
Market range: <3.3 m/s – >12 m/s
This drone has max wind resistance of 2 m/s, lower than 97.1% of drones and equal to 2.2% of drones.
Max service ceiling (ASL)
3,000 m
Max service ceiling (ASL)
3,000 m
▼ Worse than 51% of models
Market range: <120 m – >6k m
This drone has a max service ceiling of 3,000 m, lower than 51.5% of drones and equal to 6.7% of drones.
Show more
What reviewers say
Video resolution
1080p
Video resolution
1080p
▼ Worse than 72% of models
This drone records video at 1080p, lower than 71.8% of drones and equal to 11.9% of drones.
4K camera
no
4K camera
no
▼ Worse than 55% of models
This drone does not support 4K video. 54.6% of drones support 4K video.
Sensor size
?
Main camera megapixels
12 MP
Main camera megapixels
12 MP
▼ Worse than 42% of models
Market range: <2 MP – >48 MP
This drone has a main camera resolution of 12 MP, higher than 41.3% of drones and equal to 16.7% of drones.
Max movie bitrate
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Obstacle detection
no
Obstacle detection
no
▼ Worse than 31% of models
This drone does not support obstacle detection. 31% of drones support obstacle detection.
Return to Home (RTH)
no
Return to Home (RTH)
no
▼ Worse than 68% of models
This drone does not support Return-to-Home (RTH). 67.5% of drones support Return-to-Home (RTH).
GPS
no
GPS
no
▼ Worse than 65% of models
This drone does not support GPS. 65.2% of drones support GPS.
GNSS systems supported
none
GNSS systems supported
none
▼ Worse than 66% of models
This drone supports none GNSS systems, which are less comprehensive than those of 65.8% and the same as those of 34.2%.
Obstacle sensing directions
N/A
Show more
What reviewers say
Max transmission distance
0.2 km
Max transmission distance
0.2 km
▼ Worse than 69% of models
Market range: <0.05 km – >15 km
This drone has a max transmission distance of 0.2 km, shorter-range than 69.4% of drones and equal to 1% of drones.
Transmission latency
?
Video transmission system
Wi-Fi
Video transmission system
Wi-Fi
▼ Worse than 44% of models
This drone uses Wi-Fi for video transmission, which is more advanced than the system used by 8.2% and the same as that used by 47.7%.
Live view quality
720p@30 fps
Live view quality
720p@30 fps
▼ Worse than 57% of models
This drone offers live view quality of 720p@30 fps, lower-quality than 56.8% of drones and equal to 22.9% of drones.
Remote control
yes
Remote control
yes
▲ Better than 5% of models
This drone has a handheld remote controller. 5% of drones offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery capacity
1,600 mAh
Battery capacity
1,600 mAh
▼ Worse than 63% of models
Market range: <550 mAh – >5k mAh
This drone has a battery capacity of 1,600 mAh, smaller than 62.7% of drones and equal to 0.5% of drones.
Battery energy
5.92 Wh
Battery energy
5.92 Wh
▼ Worse than 75% of models
Market range: <3.7 Wh – >77 Wh
This drone has battery energy of 5.92 Wh, lower than 75.3% of drones and equal to 0.6% of drones.
Charging time
90 min
Charging time
90 min
▲ Better than 44% of models
Market range: <55 min – >180 min
This drone charges in 90 min, faster than 43.8% of drones and equal to 18.8% of drones.
Weight
165 g
Weight
165 g
▲ Better than 70% of models
Market range: <80 g – >920 g
This drone weighs 165 g, lighter than 70.1% of drones.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
▲ Better than 1% of models
This drone has a removable battery. 0.5% of drones have a removable battery.
Show more
What reviewers say

Ameta S20 Lite vs the average drone

246810TotalFlightCameraSafetyConnectivityBattery & Design
  • More modern charging port
    Charging interface
    USB-C
    ▲ Better than 61% of models
    This drone uses USB-C for charging, while the average drone uses micro-USB.
    USB-C vs micro-USB
  • Supports TapFly
    TapFly
    yes
    ▲ Better than 62% of models
    This drone supports TapFly, while the average drone does not.
  • More frequency bands
    Operating frequency bands
    2.4 GHz, 5.2 GHz, 5.8 GHz
    ▲ Better than 84% of models
    This drone supports 2.4 GHz, 5.2 GHz, 5.8 GHz operating frequency bands, while the average drone supports 2.4 GHz, 5.8 GHz.
    2.4 GHz, 5.2 GHz, 5.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz, 5.8 GHz
  • Supports smartphone control
    Smartphone control
    yes
    ▲ Better than 50% of models
    This drone supports smartphone control, while the average drone does not.
  • 32.9% lower weight
    Weight
    165 g
    ▲ Better than 70% of models
    Market range: <80 g – >920 g
    This drone is lighter than the average drone (165 g vs 246 g). The average drone weighs 246 g.
    165 g vs 246 g
  • Supports burst mode
    Burst mode
    yes
    ▲ Better than 61% of models
    This drone supports burst mode, while the average drone does not.
  • 7.5 mm lower body height
    Height
    55 mm
    ▲ Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <38 mm – >120 mm
    This drone is shorter than the average drone (55 mm vs 62.5 mm). The average drone is 62.5 mm tall.
    55 mm vs 62.5 mm
  • 2.86x cheaper
    Ameta S20 Lite is cheaper than the average drone (£70 vs £200).
    £70 vs £200
  • 2.86x cheaper
    Ameta S20 Lite is cheaper than the average drone (£70 vs £200).
    £70 vs £200
  • Supports burst mode
    Burst mode
    yes
    ▲ Better than 61% of models
    This drone supports burst mode, while the average drone does not.
  • Supports TapFly
    TapFly
    yes
    ▲ Better than 62% of models
    This drone supports TapFly, while the average drone does not.
  • Supports smartphone control
    Smartphone control
    yes
    ▲ Better than 50% of models
    This drone supports smartphone control, while the average drone does not.
  • More frequency bands
    Operating frequency bands
    2.4 GHz, 5.2 GHz, 5.8 GHz
    ▲ Better than 84% of models
    This drone supports 2.4 GHz, 5.2 GHz, 5.8 GHz operating frequency bands, while the average drone supports 2.4 GHz, 5.8 GHz.
    2.4 GHz, 5.2 GHz, 5.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz, 5.8 GHz
  • More modern charging port
    Charging interface
    USB-C
    ▲ Better than 61% of models
    This drone uses USB-C for charging, while the average drone uses micro-USB.
    USB-C vs micro-USB
  • 32.9% lower weight
    Weight
    165 g
    ▲ Better than 70% of models
    Market range: <80 g – >920 g
    This drone is lighter than the average drone (165 g vs 246 g). The average drone weighs 246 g.
    165 g vs 246 g
  • 7.5 mm lower body height
    Height
    55 mm
    ▲ Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <38 mm – >120 mm
    This drone is shorter than the average drone (55 mm vs 62.5 mm). The average drone is 62.5 mm tall.
    55 mm vs 62.5 mm
  • Lower video resolution
    Video resolution
    1080p
    ▼ Worse than 72% of models
    This drone offers lower video resolution than the average drone (1080p vs 4K/100 fps). The average drone offers a video resolution of 4K/100 fps.
    1080p vs 4K/100 fps
  • 8.7 m/s lower wind resistance
    Max wind resistance
    2 m/s
    ▼ Worse than 97% of models
    Market range: <3.3 m/s – >12 m/s
    This drone handles weaker wind than the average drone (2 m/s vs 10.7 m/s). The average drone handles wind up to 10.7 m/s.
    2 m/s vs 10.7 m/s
  • Fewer GNSS systems
    GNSS systems supported
    none
    ▼ Worse than 66% of models
    This drone supports none GNSS systems, while the average drone supports GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou.
    none vs GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou
  • More basic transmission system
    Video transmission system
    Wi-Fi
    ▼ Worse than 44% of models
    This drone uses Wi-Fi for video transmission, while the average drone uses SkyLink 2.0.
    Wi-Fi vs SkyLink 2.0
  • 10 m/s slower flight speed
    Max flight speed
    5 m/s
    ▼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <4 m/s – >21 m/s
    This drone reaches a lower max flight speed than the average drone (5 m/s vs 15 m/s). The average drone reaches 15 m/s.
    5 m/s vs 15 m/s
  • No subject tracking
    Subject tracking
    no
    ▼ Worse than 61% of models
    This drone cannot track subjects, while the average drone can.
  • No return-to-home (RTH)
    Return to Home (RTH)
    no
    ▼ Worse than 68% of models
    This drone does not support return-to-home (RTH), while the average drone does.
  • No GPS
    GPS
    no
    ▼ Worse than 65% of models
    This drone does not have GPS, while the average drone does.
  • 4.8% worse value for money
    Ameta S20 Lite has worse value for money than the average drone (6.73 vs 7.1).
    6.73 vs 7.06
  • 8.7 m/s lower wind resistance
    Max wind resistance
    2 m/s
    ▼ Worse than 97% of models
    Market range: <3.3 m/s – >12 m/s
    This drone handles weaker wind than the average drone (2 m/s vs 10.7 m/s). The average drone handles wind up to 10.7 m/s.
    2 m/s vs 10.7 m/s
  • 10 m/s slower flight speed
    Max flight speed
    5 m/s
    ▼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <4 m/s – >21 m/s
    This drone reaches a lower max flight speed than the average drone (5 m/s vs 15 m/s). The average drone reaches 15 m/s.
    5 m/s vs 15 m/s
  • 2 m/s slower descent speed
    Max descent speed
    2 m/s
    ▼ Worse than 90% of models
    Market range: <2 m/s – >8 m/s
    This drone descends more slowly than the average drone (2 m/s vs 4 m/s). The average drone descends at 4 m/s.
    2 m/s vs 4 m/s
  • 0.8 km shorter flight distance
    Max flight distance
    0.2 km
    ▼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <0.05 km – >24 km
    This drone has a shorter max flight distance than the average drone (0.2 km vs 1 km). The average drone can fly up to 1 km.
    0.2 km vs 1 km
  • 2 m/s slower ascent speed
    Max ascent speed
    3 m/s
    ▼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <3 m/s – >8 m/s
    This drone climbs more slowly than the average drone (3 m/s vs 5 m/s). The average drone climbs at 5 m/s.
    3 m/s vs 5 m/s
  • 2 min shorter flight time
    Max flight time
    18 min
    ▼ Worse than 56% of models
    Market range: <8 min – >40 min
    This drone offers shorter max flight time than the average drone (18 min vs 20 min). The average drone offers 20 min of max flight time.
    18 min vs 20 min
  • 500 m lower service ceiling
    Max service ceiling (ASL)
    3,000 m
    ▼ Worse than 51% of models
    Market range: <120 m – >6k m
    This drone can fly at a lower max service ceiling than the average drone (3000 m vs 3500 m). The average drone reaches 3500 m.
    3,000 m vs 3,500 m
  • Lower video resolution
    Video resolution
    1080p
    ▼ Worse than 72% of models
    This drone offers lower video resolution than the average drone (1080p vs 4K/100 fps). The average drone offers a video resolution of 4K/100 fps.
    1080p vs 4K/100 fps
  • Fewer photo format options
    Photo formats supported
    JPEG
    ▼ Worse than 41% of models
    This drone supports JPEG photo formats, while the average drone supports JPEG, DNG (RAW).
    JPEG vs JPEG, DNG (RAW)
  • More basic stabilization
    Image stabilization type
    None (Fixed)
    ▼ Worse than 64% of models
    This drone uses None (Fixed) image stabilization, while the average drone uses EIS (Digital).
    None (Fixed) vs EIS (Digital)
  • Narrower tilt range
    Camera tilt range
    -90 to 0 °
    ▼ Worse than 33% of models
    This drone has a narrower tilt range than the average drone (-90 to 0 ° vs -90 to 20 °).
    -90 to 0 ° vs -90 to 20 °
  • 12 ° narrower field of view
    Field of view
    78 °
    ▼ Worse than 94% of models
    Market range: <79 ° – >130 °
    This drone has a narrower field of view than the average drone (78 ° vs 90 °). The average drone has a field of view of 90 °.
    78 ° vs 90 °
  • No 4K video
    4K camera
    no
    ▼ Worse than 55% of models
    This drone does not support 4K video, while the average drone does.
  • Fewer GNSS systems
    GNSS systems supported
    none
    ▼ Worse than 66% of models
    This drone supports none GNSS systems, while the average drone supports GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou.
    none vs GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou
  • No subject tracking
    Subject tracking
    no
    ▼ Worse than 61% of models
    This drone cannot track subjects, while the average drone can.
  • No return-to-home (RTH)
    Return to Home (RTH)
    no
    ▼ Worse than 68% of models
    This drone does not support return-to-home (RTH), while the average drone does.
  • No GPS
    GPS
    no
    ▼ Worse than 65% of models
    This drone does not have GPS, while the average drone does.
  • 3 fewer flight modes
    N. of intelligent flight modes
    1
    ▼ Worse than 75% of models
    Market range: <0 – >8
    This drone offers fewer intelligent flight modes than the average drone (1 vs 4). The average drone offers 4 intelligent flight modes.
    POI
    1 vs 4
  • 0.2 m worse hover accuracy
    Hover accuracy (horizontal)
    0.5 m
    ▼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <0.3 m – >1.4 m
    This drone has worse horizontal hover accuracy than the average drone (0.5 m vs 0.3 m). The average drone has horizontal hover accuracy of 0.3 m.
    0.5 m vs 0.3 m
  • No beginner mode
    Beginner mode
    no
    ▼ Worse than 56% of models
    This drone does not support beginner mode, while the average drone does.
  • More basic transmission system
    Video transmission system
    Wi-Fi
    ▼ Worse than 44% of models
    This drone uses Wi-Fi for video transmission, while the average drone uses SkyLink 2.0.
    Wi-Fi vs SkyLink 2.0
  • Lower live view quality
    Live view quality
    720p@30 fps
    ▼ Worse than 57% of models
    This drone has worse live view quality than the average drone (720p@30 fps vs 1080p@25 fps). The average drone offers live view quality of 1080p@25 fps.
    720p@30 fps vs 1080p@25 fps
  • 0.8 km shorter transmission range
    Max transmission distance
    0.2 km
    ▼ Worse than 69% of models
    Market range: <0.05 km – >15 km
    This drone has a shorter max transmission distance than the average drone (0.2 km vs 1 km). The average drone reaches 1 km of transmission distance.
    0.2 km vs 1 km
  • Basic companion app
    Companion app
    AMETA Drone
    ▼ Worse than 74% of models
    This drone uses the AMETA Drone companion app, while the average drone uses HS FPV.
    AMETA Drone vs HS FPV
  • 11.26 Wh less battery energy
    Battery energy
    5.92 Wh
    ▼ Worse than 75% of models
    Market range: <3.7 Wh – >77 Wh
    This drone has lower battery energy than the average drone (5.9 Wh vs 17.18 Wh). The average drone battery has 17.18 Wh of energy.
    5.92 Wh vs 17.18 Wh
  • 600 mAh less battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    1,600 mAh
    ▼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <550 mAh – >5k mAh
    This drone has a smaller battery capacity than the average drone (1600 mAh vs 2200 mAh). The average drone battery has a capacity of 2200 mAh.
    1,600 mAh vs 2,200 mAh
  • 44 mm wider width
    Width
    285 mm
    ▼ Worse than 69% of models
    Market range: <114 mm – >387.5 mm
    This drone is wider than the average drone (285 mm vs 241 mm). The average drone width is 241 mm.
    285 mm vs 241 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

7.0
ZenBein
≈ estimated
20/06/2025
Hands-on review · flight, crash test and battery impressions
Verdict
Ameta S20 Lite is decent for a disposable holiday drone, but it is not the first pick at this price.
8.0
Eric’s Tech World
≈ estimated
19/04/2025
Hands-on review · setup, flight test and cons
Verdict
Ameta S20 Lite is a decent beginner drone, but it records no sound and its 4K claim is misleading.
8.0
Matt Liller
≈ estimated
12/03/2025
Hands-on review · beginner friendliness and camera test
Verdict
Ameta S20 Lite is a solid pick for beginners on a budget, though its video stabilization and quality are weak.
6.0
Gadget Squared
≈ estimated
12/03/2025
Hands-on review · flight, battery test and footage quality
Verdict
Ameta S20 Lite suits beginners on a budget, but it is not the choice for good aerial footage.
8.0
Stephen F Photography
≈ estimated
02/03/2025
Hands-on review · setup, flying and camera test
Verdict
Ameta S20 Lite is a fun drone for beginners and gifts, but it is not suited to serious footage.
8.0
Random Tech
≈ estimated
07/02/2025
Hands-on review · setup, flying and battery test
Verdict
Ameta S20 Lite suits first-time pilots well, though wind and the lack of GPS call for careful flying.
7.0
Open Circuit RC & Tech
≈ estimated
29/01/2025
Hands-on flight review · test flight, footage and photos
Verdict
Ameta S20 Lite is a decent little flyer for beginners, but its video falls well short of the advertised 4K.
9.0
RC Escape
≈ estimated
25/01/2025
Hands-on review · flight test, features and unboxing
Verdict
Ameta S20 Lite is a good beginner quadcopter for the price, with some limits on features and Wi-Fi range.
8.0
Ready To Run RC
≈ estimated
08/11/2024
Hands-on review · flight, battery and wind test
Verdict
Ameta S20 Lite suits beginners with long flight time and a steady hover, but it feels slow for experts and follow-me did not work.
9.0
LampoFilm
≈ estimated
31/12/2024
Short review · quick look at flight features
Verdict
Ameta S20 Lite is easy to fly and suits beginners and advanced pilots, though its blades are exposed.

What reviewers agree on

Based on 0 · 26

Reviewers like the light, compact build, long battery life and easy controls, but image quality and lack of stabilisation disappoint.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Third-party reviews

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Ameta S20 Lite

  • Beginner-friendly with easy one-button takeoff and landing features
  • Highly portable, lightweight (under 249g), and foldable design
  • Comes with two batteries providing a total flight time of approximately 36 minutes
  • Quiet and stable flight performance due to brushless motors
  • Affordable price point, often found for around $100-$150
  • Includes fun features like 360-degree flips and 'Circle Fly' mode

What we don't like about Ameta S20 Lite

  • Misleading camera specs; while advertised as 4K, video is often 1080p or 720p with poor detail
  • Lacks a gimbal or electronic image stabilization, leading to shaky and choppy footage
  • No GPS or obstacle avoidance, making it prone to drifting and crashing
  • Susceptible to wind due to its very lightweight plastic build
  • Limited flight range, with weak signal reported at approximately 100 metres
  • Lower build quality feels 'cheap' and may not be very durable after crashes

Verdict

The Ameta S20 Lite is a beginner-friendly, foldable quadcopter weighing under 249g, making it registration-free in many regions. It features powerful brushless motors for increased stability and a 4K UHD camera with a 12MP Sony CMOS sensor and a 90-degree remote-adjustable lens. Key performance highlights include a total flight time of approximately 36 minutes across two included 1600mAh batteries and a 5G Wi-Fi FPV transmission range of up to 200-300 metres. Main pros include its highly portable design, easy-to-use modes like altitude hold, one-key takeoff, and 360-degree flips, as well as its quiet brushless performance. However, notable cons include the lack of GPS and electronic image stabilization, which can lead to shaky video, and the absence of obstacle avoidance sensors.

Compare Ameta S20 Lite with other drones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Ameta S20 Lite and other drones

No results found