Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Nikon D5100 Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£110Sensor size:APS-CWeight:560 gBattery life (CIPA):660 shots

Nikon D5100 Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

5.8

Overall score

Score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

5.5

Technical score

10%

9.2

User score

â–²Better than 69% of cameras
5.5

Technical score

Technical score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

6.5

Sensor & Image

25%

4.7

Photo Features

18%

4.8

Video & Audio

14%

6.0

Display & Design

8%

7.0

Battery & Power

7%

2.6

Connectivity & Storage

â–²Better than 63% of cameras
9.2

User score

User score
9.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.9

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on 3,709 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
★Better than 95% of cameras
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Nikon D5100

Technical score
Technical score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

6.5

Sensor & Image

25%

4.7

Photo Features

18%

4.8

Video & Audio

14%

6.0

Display & Design

8%

7.0

Battery & Power

7%

2.6

Connectivity & Storage

5.5
User score
User score
9.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.9

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on 3,709 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
9.2
Popularity
Popularity
10.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Nikon D5100 has a popularity score of 10, which is higher than 91.7% of cameras.
10
Value for money
Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

5.8

Overall score

40%

9.9

Price

7.1
Sensor size
APS-C
Sensor size
APS-C
This camera uses a sensor classified as APS-C; it is larger than the sensor in 57.4% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 25.7% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
16.2 MP
Main camera megapixels
16.2 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP, which is higher than that of 46.8% of cameras and equal to that of 4.2% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
4.78 µm
Main camera pixel size
4.78 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 4.78 µm, which are larger than those in 77.4% of cameras and the same size as those in 1.2% of cameras.
Base ISO
100
Base ISO
100
This camera has a base ISO of 100 which is higher than that of 19.9% of cameras and equal to that of 52.4% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 6400 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 6,400
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 6,400, which is higher than that of 37.3% of cameras and equal to that of 16.2% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
Nikon F
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
11
N. of focus points
11
This camera has 11 focus points, fewer than the number offered by 60.4% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 6.5% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
yes
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
yes
This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.3% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
AF tracking
yes
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 88% of cameras.
Show more
Max video resolution
1920 px
Max video resolution
1920 px
This camera supports 1920 px video recording which is higher quality than that of 28.7% of cameras and equal to that of 47.1% of cameras.
Video bitrate
18 Mbps
Video bitrate
18 Mbps
This camera has a video bitrate of 18 Mbps which is lower than that of 75.6% of cameras and equal to that of 1.4% of cameras.
Video bit depth
8 bit
Video bit depth
8 bit
This camera supports video at 8 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 80.6% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
This camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 69.9% of cameras.
Video codecs
H.264
Show more
Type
dslr
Weight
560 g
Weight
560 g
This camera weighs 560 g which is heavier than 70.1% of cameras and equal to the weight of 0.4% of cameras.
Width
128 mm
Width
128 mm
This camera has a width of 128 mm which is wider than 66.7% of cameras and equal to that of 1.1% of cameras.
Height
97 mm
Height
97 mm
This camera has a height of 97 mm which is taller than 77.2% of cameras and equal to that of 1.7% of cameras.
Thickness
79 mm
Thickness
79 mm
This camera has a thickness of 79 mm which is thicker than 76.6% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
660 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
660 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 660 shots, which is longer than that of 88.9% of cameras and equal to that of 0.1% of cameras.
Battery capacity
1,030 mAh
Battery capacity
1,030 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 1,030 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 61.9% of cameras and equal to those in 1.8% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This camera does not support Wi-Fi. 47.9% of cameras include this feature.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Nikon D5100 vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • Phase-detect AF for photos
    Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
    yes
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos, the average camera does not.
  • Has microphone input
    Microphone input
    yes
    This camera has microphone input, the average camera does not.
  • 330 shots more shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    660 shots
    This camera has longer battery life than the average camera (660 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    660 shots vs 330 shots
  • Fully articulated screen
    Flip-out screen
    yes
    This camera has a fully articulated screen, the average camera does not.
  • Sensor cleaning system
    Sensor cleaning system
    yes
    This camera includes a sensor cleaning system, the average camera does not.
    Ultrasonic vibration cleaning.
  • 1.44 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    4.78 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (4.8 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    4.78 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    optical
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (optical vs none).
    Pentamirror optical viewfinder.
    optical vs none
  • 1.2 points higher DxOMark Landscape score
    DxOMark landscape score
    13.6 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark landscape score than the average camera (13.6 points vs 12.4 points). The average camera scores 12.4 points.
    13.6 points vs 12.4 points
  • 15.2% higher user score
    User score
    9.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Nikon D5100
    the average camera
    Nikon D5100 has a higher user score than the average camera (9.21 vs 8.000).
    9.21 vs 8
  • 5.18x more popular
    Nikon D5100 is more popular than the average camera (10 vs 1.9).
    10 vs 1.93
  • 2.64x cheaper
    Nikon D5100 is cheaper than the average camera (£110 vs £290).
    £110 vs £290
  • 14.1% better value for money
    Nikon D5100 has a better value-for-money score than the average camera (7.07 vs 6.2).
    7.07 vs 6.2
  • Fully articulated screen
    Flip-out screen
    yes
    This camera has a fully articulated screen, the average camera does not.
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    optical
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (optical vs none).
    Pentamirror optical viewfinder.
    optical vs none
  • 1 more customizable buttons
    Customizable button count
    1
    This camera has more customizable buttons than the average camera (1 vs 0). The average camera offers 0 customizable buttons.
    1 vs 0
  • Sensor cleaning system
    Sensor cleaning system
    yes
    This camera includes a sensor cleaning system, the average camera does not.
    Ultrasonic vibration cleaning.
  • 1.44 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    4.78 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (4.8 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    4.78 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 1.2 points higher DxOMark Landscape score
    DxOMark landscape score
    13.6 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark landscape score than the average camera (13.6 points vs 12.4 points). The average camera scores 12.4 points.
    13.6 points vs 12.4 points
  • 7 points higher DxOMark sensor score
    DxOMark sensor score
    80 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark sensor score than the average camera (80 points vs 73 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sensor score of 73 points.
    80 points vs 73 points
  • 340 points higher DxOMark Sports score
    DxOMark sports score
    1,183 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark sports score than the average camera (1183 points vs 843 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sports score of 843 points.
    1,183 points vs 843 points
  • Phase-detect AF for photos
    Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
    yes
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos, the average camera does not.
  • Has anti-flicker mode
    Anti-flicker mode
    yes
    This camera includes an anti-flicker mode, the average camera does not. 20% of cameras include it.
  • Has microphone input
    Microphone input
    yes
    This camera has microphone input, the average camera does not.
  • Built-in timelapse
    Timelapse function
    yes
    This camera includes timelapse capture, the average camera does not.
  • Supports 24p cinema mode
    24p cinema mode
    yes
    This camera supports 24p cinema mode, the average camera does not. 44% of cameras support this mode.
  • 330 shots more shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    660 shots
    This camera has longer battery life than the average camera (660 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    660 shots vs 330 shots
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    -1
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (-1 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    -1 vs -4
  • 5 % lower viewfinder coverage
    Viewfinder coverage
    95 %
    This camera has a lower viewfinder coverage than the average camera (95 % vs 100 %). The average camera has viewfinder coverage of 100 %.
    95 % vs 100 %
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2
  • 165 g heavier
    Weight
    560 g
    This camera is heavier than the average camera (560 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    560 g vs 395 g
  • 1.7 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    4 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (4 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    4 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 12 Mbps lower video bitrate
    Video bitrate
    18 Mbps
    This camera has a lower video bitrate than the average camera (18 Mbps vs 30 Mbps). The average camera records at 30 Mbps.
    18 Mbps vs 30 Mbps
  • 23.1 mm taller body
    Height
    97 mm
    This camera is taller than the average camera (97 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    97 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 2 older
    Release date
    2011
    This camera is older than the average camera (2011 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    April 2011
    2,011 vs 2,013
  • 5 % lower viewfinder coverage
    Viewfinder coverage
    95 %
    This camera has a lower viewfinder coverage than the average camera (95 % vs 100 %). The average camera has viewfinder coverage of 100 %.
    95 % vs 100 %
  • 165 g heavier
    Weight
    560 g
    This camera is heavier than the average camera (560 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    560 g vs 395 g
  • 23.1 mm taller body
    Height
    97 mm
    This camera is taller than the average camera (97 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    97 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 33 mm thicker
    Thickness
    79 mm
    This camera is thicker than the average camera (79 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    79 mm vs 46 mm
  • 8.1 mm wider
    Width
    128 mm
    This camera is wider than the average camera (128 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    128 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • 2 older
    Release date
    2011
    This camera is older than the average camera (2011 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    April 2011
    2,011 vs 2,013
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    -1
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (-1 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    -1 vs -4
  • 1.7 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    4 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (4 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    4 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 12 fewer AF points
    N. of focus points
    11
    This camera has fewer focus points than the average camera (11 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    11 vs 23
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2
  • 12 Mbps lower video bitrate
    Video bitrate
    18 Mbps
    This camera has a lower video bitrate than the average camera (18 Mbps vs 30 Mbps). The average camera records at 30 Mbps.
    18 Mbps vs 30 Mbps
  • 10 min shorter recording time
    Max video recording time
    20 min
    This camera records continuously for less time than the average camera (20 min vs 30 min). The average camera records for 30 min.
    20 min vs 30 min
  • 90 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    1,030 mAh
    This camera has a lower battery capacity than the average camera (1030 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    1,030 mAh vs 1,120 mAh

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

D
dpreview.com
26/04/2011
Summary of the review
P
photographylife.com
28/10/2020
Summary of the review
K
kenrockwell.com
01/04/2011
Summary of the review
R
radojuva.com
07/02/2012
Summary of the review
A
amateurphotographer.com
25/05/2011
Summary of the review
W
whatdigitalcamera.com
19/04/2011
Summary of the review
N
naturalexposures.com
19/05/2011
Summary of the review
D
dxomark.com
28/04/2011
Summary of the review
D
digital-photography-school.com
17/06/2011
Summary of the review
P
photographybay.com
18/07/2011
Summary of the review
R
reviewed.com
03/06/2011
Summary of the review
G
greatbigscaryworld.com
25/02/2018
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
05/04/2011
Summary of the review
D
digitalkamera.de
11/04/2011
Summary of the review
D
dkamera.de
29/07/2019
Summary of the review
K
kameratester.com
N/A
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
04/05/2011
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
22/05/2011
Summary of the review
N
nikonpassion.com
26/04/2011
Summary of the review
1
1point2vue.com
05/08/2011
Summary of the review
D
diisign.com
08/01/2012
Summary of the review
S
s2pmag.ch
09/01/2012
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
20/04/2011
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
29/04/2011
Summary of the review
E
eyrolles.com
16/01/2012
Summary of the review
N
nikonpassion.com
05/04/2011
Summary of the review
C
camerarace.com
26/04/2011
Summary of the review
P
photographiesdelannee.com
20/07/2025
Summary of the review
0
01net.com
29/07/2011
Summary of the review
R
radojuva.com
07/02/2012
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
22/05/2011
Summary of the review
R
radojuva.com
07/02/2012
Summary of the review
S
saggiamente.com
15/09/2011
Summary of the review
F
fotocamerapro.it
09/06/2015
Summary of the review
F
fotografiastore.it
22/10/2026
Summary of the review
Y
yumpu.com
03/10/2013
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
19/09/2011
Summary of the review
F
focus-review.com
01/02/2012
Summary of the review
M
mixedgrill.nl
05/10/2011
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 3,709 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Nikon D5100

  • Excellent image quality and high ISO performance similar to the higher-end D7000
  • Versatile 3-inch fully articulated (swivel) high-resolution LCD screen
  • Compact and lightweight body design, making it highly portable for travel
  • Remarkable dynamic range and color reproduction, especially when shooting in RAW
  • Availability of an external microphone port for better audio in videos
  • Good overall value, especially as a budget-friendly used option in recent years

What we don't like about Nikon D5100

  • No built-in autofocus motor, requiring AF-S lenses for automatic focusing
  • Lack of dedicated buttons for key settings like ISO and White Balance
  • Loud and slow autofocus performance during video recording
  • Small pentamirror viewfinder compared to more advanced models
  • Cluttered or awkward button layout that can be frustrating for beginners
  • Limited manual controls in video mode, such as the inability to adjust aperture while recording

Verdict

The Nikon D5100 is a versatile DX-format DSLR featuring a 16.2-megapixel CMOS sensor and the EXPEED 2 processing engine, both inherited from the higher-end D7000. Key specifications include an 11-point autofocus system with 3D tracking, a native ISO range of 100–6400 (expandable to 25,600), and 4 fps continuous shooting. Its most prominent physical feature is a 3-inch, 921,000-dot side-articulating vari-angle LCD, which supports Full HD 1080p video recording at up to 30 fps and an external stereo microphone jack. Main pros include exceptional image quality, strong high-ISO performance for its class, and a compact, lightweight body that remains beginner-friendly. However, it lacks an internal autofocus motor (requiring AF-S or AF-I lenses for AF), has a relatively small pentamirror viewfinder with 95% coverage, and lacks dedicated buttons for quick ISO or white balance adjustments.

Compare Nikon D5100 with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Nikon D5100 and other products in the Cameras category

No results found