Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Nikon D3200 Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£120Sensor size:APS-CWeight:505 gBattery life (CIPA):540 shots

Nikon D3200 Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

5.6

Overall score

Score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

5.2

Technical score

10%

9.3

User score

â–²Better than 63% of cameras
5.2

Technical score

Technical score
5.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

6.1

Sensor & Image

25%

4.7

Photo Features

18%

4.7

Video & Audio

14%

5.3

Display & Design

8%

7.0

Battery & Power

7%

2.6

Connectivity & Storage

â–²Better than 57% of cameras
9.3

User score

User score
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on 2,438 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
★Better than 96% of cameras
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Nikon D3200

Technical score
Technical score
5.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

6.1

Sensor & Image

25%

4.7

Photo Features

18%

4.7

Video & Audio

14%

5.3

Display & Design

8%

7.0

Battery & Power

7%

2.6

Connectivity & Storage

5.2
User score
User score
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on 2,438 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
9.3
Popularity
Popularity
10.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Nikon D3200 has a popularity score of 10, which is higher than 91.7% of cameras.
10
Value for money
Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

5.6

Overall score

40%

9.9

Price

6.9
Sensor size
APS-C
Sensor size
APS-C
This camera uses a sensor classified as APS-C; it is larger than the sensor in 57.4% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 25.7% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
24.2 MP
Main camera megapixels
24.2 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 24.2 MP, which is higher than that of 78% of cameras and equal to that of 5.8% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
3.85 µm
Main camera pixel size
3.85 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 3.85 µm, which are larger than those in 62.5% of cameras.
Base ISO
100
Base ISO
100
This camera has a base ISO of 100 which is higher than that of 19.9% of cameras and equal to that of 52.4% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 6400 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 6,400
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 6,400, which is higher than that of 37.3% of cameras and equal to that of 16.2% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
Nikon F
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
11
N. of focus points
11
This camera has 11 focus points, fewer than the number offered by 60.4% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 6.5% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
yes
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
yes
This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.3% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
AF tracking
yes
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 88% of cameras.
Show more
Max video resolution
1920 px
Max video resolution
1920 px
This camera supports 1920 px video recording which is higher quality than that of 28.7% of cameras and equal to that of 47.1% of cameras.
Video bitrate
24 Mbps
Video bitrate
24 Mbps
This camera has a video bitrate of 24 Mbps which is lower than that of 62.5% of cameras and equal to that of 7% of cameras.
Video bit depth
8 bit
Video bit depth
8 bit
This camera supports video at 8 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 80.6% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
This camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 69.9% of cameras.
Video codecs
H.264
Show more
Type
dslr
Weight
505 g
Weight
505 g
This camera weighs 505 g which is heavier than 63.4% of cameras and equal to the weight of 0.2% of cameras.
Width
125 mm
Width
125 mm
This camera has a width of 125 mm which is wider than 61.9% of cameras and equal to that of 0.8% of cameras.
Height
96 mm
Height
96 mm
This camera has a height of 96 mm which is taller than 75.4% of cameras and equal to that of 0.3% of cameras.
Thickness
77 mm
Thickness
77 mm
This camera has a thickness of 77 mm which is thicker than 71.9% of cameras and equal to that of 0.5% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
540 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
540 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 540 shots, which is longer than that of 84.3% of cameras and equal to that of 0.9% of cameras.
Battery capacity
1,030 mAh
Battery capacity
1,030 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 1,030 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 61.9% of cameras and equal to those in 1.8% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This camera does not support Wi-Fi. 47.9% of cameras include this feature.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Nikon D3200 vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • Phase-detect AF for photos
    Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
    yes
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos, the average camera does not.
  • Has microphone input
    Microphone input
    yes
    This camera has microphone input, the average camera does not.
    3.5 mm mic input
  • 210 shots more shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    540 shots
    This camera has longer battery life than the average camera (540 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    540 shots vs 330 shots
  • Sensor cleaning system
    Sensor cleaning system
    yes
    This camera includes a sensor cleaning system, the average camera does not.
    Ultrasonic vibration cleaning.
  • Higher sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    24.2 MP
    This camera has a higher sensor resolution than the average camera (24.2 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    24.2 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    optical
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (optical vs none).
    Pentamirror optical viewfinder.
    optical vs none
  • Supports 24p cinema mode
    24p cinema mode
    yes
    This camera supports 24p cinema mode, the average camera does not. 44% of cameras support this mode.
  • 1.1 points higher DxOMark Portrait score
    DxOMark portrait score
    24.1 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark portrait score than the average camera (24.1 points vs 23 points). The average camera scores 23.0 points.
    24.1 points vs 23.0 points
  • 16% higher user score
    User score
    9.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Nikon D3200
    the average camera
    Nikon D3200 has a higher user score than the average camera (9.28 vs 8.000).
    9.28 vs 8
  • 5.18x more popular
    Nikon D3200 is more popular than the average camera (10 vs 1.9).
    10 vs 1.93
  • 2.42x cheaper
    Nikon D3200 is cheaper than the average camera (£120 vs £290).
    £120 vs £290
  • 11.5% better value for money
    Nikon D3200 has a better value-for-money score than the average camera (6.91 vs 6.2).
    6.91 vs 6.2
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    optical
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (optical vs none).
    Pentamirror optical viewfinder.
    optical vs none
  • 1 more customizable buttons
    Customizable button count
    1
    This camera has more customizable buttons than the average camera (1 vs 0). The average camera offers 0 customizable buttons.
    1 vs 0
  • Sensor cleaning system
    Sensor cleaning system
    yes
    This camera includes a sensor cleaning system, the average camera does not.
    Ultrasonic vibration cleaning.
  • Higher sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    24.2 MP
    This camera has a higher sensor resolution than the average camera (24.2 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    24.2 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 1.1 points higher DxOMark Portrait score
    DxOMark portrait score
    24.1 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark portrait score than the average camera (24.1 points vs 23 points). The average camera scores 23.0 points.
    24.1 points vs 23.0 points
  • 0.8 points higher DxOMark Landscape score
    DxOMark landscape score
    13.2 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark landscape score than the average camera (13.2 points vs 12.4 points). The average camera scores 12.4 points.
    13.2 points vs 12.4 points
  • 8 points higher DxOMark sensor score
    DxOMark sensor score
    81 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark sensor score than the average camera (81 points vs 73 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sensor score of 73 points.
    81 points vs 73 points
  • 0.51 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    3.85 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (3.9 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    3.85 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 288 points higher DxOMark Sports score
    DxOMark sports score
    1,131 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark sports score than the average camera (1131 points vs 843 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sports score of 843 points.
    1,131 points vs 843 points
  • Phase-detect AF for photos
    Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
    yes
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos, the average camera does not.
  • Has microphone input
    Microphone input
    yes
    This camera has microphone input, the average camera does not.
    3.5 mm mic input
  • Supports 24p cinema mode
    24p cinema mode
    yes
    This camera supports 24p cinema mode, the average camera does not. 44% of cameras support this mode.
  • 210 shots more shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    540 shots
    This camera has longer battery life than the average camera (540 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    540 shots vs 330 shots
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    -1
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (-1 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    -1 vs -4
  • 5 % lower viewfinder coverage
    Viewfinder coverage
    95 %
    This camera has a lower viewfinder coverage than the average camera (95 % vs 100 %). The average camera has viewfinder coverage of 100 %.
    95 % vs 100 %
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2
  • 1.7 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    4 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (4 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    4 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 110 g heavier
    Weight
    505 g
    This camera is heavier than the average camera (505 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    505 g vs 395 g
  • 22.1 mm taller body
    Height
    96 mm
    This camera is taller than the average camera (96 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    96 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 5 % lower viewfinder coverage
    Viewfinder coverage
    95 %
    This camera has a lower viewfinder coverage than the average camera (95 % vs 100 %). The average camera has viewfinder coverage of 100 %.
    95 % vs 100 %
  • 110 g heavier
    Weight
    505 g
    This camera is heavier than the average camera (505 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    505 g vs 395 g
  • 22.1 mm taller body
    Height
    96 mm
    This camera is taller than the average camera (96 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    96 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 31 mm thicker
    Thickness
    77 mm
    This camera is thicker than the average camera (77 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    77 mm vs 46 mm
  • 5.1 mm wider
    Width
    125 mm
    This camera is wider than the average camera (125 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    125 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • 12,500 ISO lower extended sensitivity limit
    Max expanded ISO
    12,800 ISO
    This camera has a lower expanded ISO than the average camera (12800 ISO vs 25300 ISO). The average camera reaches an expanded ISO of 25300 ISO.
    12,800 ISO vs 25,300 ISO
  • 1 older
    Release date
    2012
    This camera is older than the average camera (2012 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    April 2012
    2,012 vs 2,013
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    -1
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (-1 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    -1 vs -4
  • 1.7 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    4 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (4 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    4 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 12 fewer AF points
    N. of focus points
    11
    This camera has fewer focus points than the average camera (11 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    11 vs 23
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2
  • 6 Mbps lower video bitrate
    Video bitrate
    24 Mbps
    This camera has a lower video bitrate than the average camera (24 Mbps vs 30 Mbps). The average camera records at 30 Mbps.
    24 Mbps vs 30 Mbps
  • 10 min shorter recording time
    Max video recording time
    20 min
    This camera records continuously for less time than the average camera (20 min vs 30 min). The average camera records for 30 min.
    20 min vs 30 min
  • 90 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    1,030 mAh
    This camera has a lower battery capacity than the average camera (1030 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    1,030 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • Older HDMI version
    HDMI version
    1.3
    This camera uses HDMI 1.3, while the average camera uses HDMI 1.4.
    1.3 vs 1.4

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

D
dpreview.com
26/07/2012
Summary of the review
P
photographylife.com
11/02/2020
Summary of the review
A
amateurphotographer.com
16/06/2012
Summary of the review
C
cnet.com
04/06/2012
Summary of the review
D
dxomark.com
20/04/2012
Summary of the review
D
dslrbodies.com
05/12/2024
Summary of the review
A
adorama.com
31/07/2012
Summary of the review
E
ephotozine.com
19/04/2012
Summary of the review
F
focus-review.com
18/07/2012
Summary of the review
K
kenrockwell.com
01/04/2012
Summary of the review
D
digitalkamera.de
19/06/2012
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
09/08/2012
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
19/04/2012
Summary of the review
S
speicherkarten.guru
10/06/2017
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
08/07/2015
Summary of the review
N
nikonpassion.com
07/06/2013
Summary of the review
0
01net.com
18/06/2012
Summary of the review
N
nikonpassion.com
08/10/2014
Summary of the review
D
darty.com
14/06/2012
Summary of the review
B
beluxphoto.forumpro.fr
04/08/2012
Summary of the review
P
photographiesdelannee.com
17/12/2024
Summary of the review
R
rescognita.com
22/08/2012
Summary of the review
R
radojuva.com
13/02/2013
Summary of the review
R
radojuva.com
13/02/2013
Summary of the review
T
tomshw.it
25/07/2012
Summary of the review
D
dday.it
10/10/2012
Summary of the review
S
saggiamente.com
24/01/2013
Summary of the review
T
tomshw.it
17/07/2012
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
19/06/2012
Summary of the review
F
focus-review.com
18/07/2012
Summary of the review
S
shoot.be
06/06/2012
Summary of the review
R
refurbed.nl
09/05/2026
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 2,438 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Nikon D3200

  • High-resolution 24.2MP sensor providing excellent detail at low ISO
  • Compact and lightweight body, ideal for travel and daily use
  • Intuitive 'Guide Mode' that assists beginners in learning settings
  • Great value for money, especially as a budget-friendly entry into DSLRs
  • External microphone socket for improved audio in video recording
  • Responsive performance with a decent 4 fps burst rate
  • Comfortable and ergonomic hand-grip design

What we don't like about Nikon D3200

  • Lackluster low-light performance with noticeable noise at high ISO
  • Slow and sometimes unreliable autofocus, especially in Live View
  • Fixed LCD screen without swivel or tilt capabilities
  • Missing advanced features like Auto Exposure Bracketing (AEB) or HDR
  • Unintuitive controls for certain settings, such as aperture in movie mode
  • No built-in autofocus motor, limiting compatibility with older non-AF-S lenses
  • Battery life indicator is imprecise and provides little warning before depletion

Verdict

The Nikon D3200 is an entry-level DX-format DSLR featuring a high-resolution 24.2-megapixel CMOS sensor and the EXPEED 3 image processor, capable of capturing detailed RAW images and Full HD 1080p video at up to 30fps. Key characteristics include an 11-point autofocus system, a 3-inch 921k-dot LCD screen, an ISO range of 100–6400 (expandable to 12800), and a burst rate of 4 frames per second. Its main pros are its impressive resolution for its class, lightweight and compact design, and a user-friendly 'Guide Mode' that assists beginners with settings. However, it lacks a built-in autofocus motor—restricting AF to AF-S or AF-P lenses—and has notable cons such as the absence of a tilting screen, no built-in Wi-Fi or HDR bracketing, and relatively slow live-view autofocus.

Compare Nikon D3200 with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Nikon D3200 and other products in the Cameras category

No results found