Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Canon EOS 1100D Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£110Sensor size:APS-CWeight:495 gBattery life (CIPA):700 shots

Canon EOS 1100D Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

5.0

Overall score

Score
5.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

4.5

Technical score

10%

9.3

User score

â–¼Worse than 57% of cameras
4.5

Technical score

Technical score
4.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

5.2

Sensor & Image

25%

4.7

Photo Features

18%

3.5

Video & Audio

14%

4.0

Display & Design

8%

6.6

Battery & Power

7%

2.6

Connectivity & Storage

â–¼Worse than 71% of cameras
9.3

User score

User score
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on 1,902 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
★Better than 97% of cameras
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Canon EOS 1100D

Technical score
Technical score
4.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

5.2

Sensor & Image

25%

4.7

Photo Features

18%

3.5

Video & Audio

14%

4.0

Display & Design

8%

6.6

Battery & Power

7%

2.6

Connectivity & Storage

4.5
User score
User score
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on 1,902 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
9.3
Popularity
Popularity
10.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Canon EOS 1100D has a popularity score of 10, which is higher than 91.7% of cameras.
10
Value for money
Value for money
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

5.0

Overall score

40%

9.9

Price

6.5
Sensor size
APS-C
Sensor size
APS-C
This camera uses a sensor classified as APS-C; it is larger than the sensor in 57.4% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 25.7% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
12.2 MP
Main camera megapixels
12.2 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 12.2 MP, which is lower than that of 85.7% of cameras and equal to that of 0.8% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
5.15 µm
Main camera pixel size
5.15 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 5.15 µm, which are larger than those in 85.1% of cameras.
Base ISO
100
Base ISO
100
This camera has a base ISO of 100 which is higher than that of 19.9% of cameras and equal to that of 52.4% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 6400 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 6,400
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 6,400, which is higher than that of 37.3% of cameras and equal to that of 16.2% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
Canon EF/EF-S
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
9
N. of focus points
9
This camera has 9 focus points, fewer than the number offered by 67.1% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 26% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
yes
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
yes
This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.3% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
AF tracking
yes
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 88% of cameras.
Show more
Max video resolution
1,280 px
Max video resolution
1,280 px
This camera supports 1,280 px video recording which is lower quality than that of 71.4% of cameras and equal to that of 18.5% of cameras.
Video bitrate
30 Mbps
Video bitrate
30 Mbps
This camera has a video bitrate of 30 Mbps which is higher than that of 48.6% of cameras and equal to that of 3.9% of cameras.
Video bit depth
8 bit
Video bit depth
8 bit
This camera supports video at 8 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 80.6% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
This camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 69.9% of cameras.
Video codecs
H.264
Show more
Type
dslr
Weight
495 g
Weight
495 g
This camera weighs 495 g which is heavier than 61.2% of cameras and equal to the weight of 0.3% of cameras.
Width
129.9 mm
Width
129.9 mm
This camera has a width of 129.9 mm which is wider than 71.9% of cameras.
Height
99.7 mm
Height
99.7 mm
This camera has a height of 99.7 mm which is taller than 82.7% of cameras and equal to that of 0.1% of cameras.
Thickness
77.9 mm
Thickness
77.9 mm
This camera has a thickness of 77.9 mm which is thicker than 74.5% of cameras and equal to that of 0.1% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
700 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
700 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 700 shots, which is longer than that of 89.5% of cameras and equal to that of 0.7% of cameras.
Battery capacity
860 mAh
Battery capacity
860 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 860 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 82.4% of cameras and equal to those in 0.6% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This camera does not support Wi-Fi. 47.9% of cameras include this feature.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Canon EOS 1100D vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • Phase-detect AF for photos
    Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
    yes
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos, the average camera does not.
  • 1.81 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    5.15 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (5.2 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    5.15 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 370 shots more shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    700 shots
    This camera has longer battery life than the average camera (700 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    700 shots vs 330 shots
  • Supports live streaming
    Live streaming (first-party)
    yes
    This camera supports live streaming, the average camera does not.
    EOS Webcam Utility.
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    optical
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (optical vs none).
    Pentamirror optical viewfinder.
    optical vs none
  • Lossless compressed RAW
    Lossless compressed RAW
    yes
    This camera supports lossless compressed RAW, while the average camera does not.
    Lossless RAW capture is supported.
  • 16.2% higher user score
    User score
    9.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Canon EOS 1100D
    the average camera
    Canon EOS 1100D has a higher user score than the average camera (9.29 vs 8.000).
    9.29 vs 8
  • 5.18x more popular
    Canon EOS 1100D is more popular than the average camera (10 vs 1.9).
    10 vs 1.93
  • 16.2% higher user score
    User score
    9.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Canon EOS 1100D
    the average camera
    Canon EOS 1100D has a higher user score than the average camera (9.29 vs 8.000).
    9.29 vs 8
  • 5.18x more popular
    Canon EOS 1100D is more popular than the average camera (10 vs 1.9).
    10 vs 1.93
  • 2.64x cheaper
    Canon EOS 1100D is cheaper than the average camera (£110 vs £290).
    £110 vs £290
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    optical
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (optical vs none).
    Pentamirror optical viewfinder.
    optical vs none
  • 1.81 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    5.15 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (5.2 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    5.15 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • Phase-detect AF for photos
    Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
    yes
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos, the average camera does not.
  • Lossless compressed RAW
    Lossless compressed RAW
    yes
    This camera supports lossless compressed RAW, while the average camera does not.
    Lossless RAW capture is supported.
  • Supports live streaming
    Live streaming (first-party)
    yes
    This camera supports live streaming, the average camera does not.
    EOS Webcam Utility.
  • 370 shots more shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    700 shots
    This camera has longer battery life than the average camera (700 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    700 shots vs 330 shots
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    -0.5
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (-0.5 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    -0.5 vs -4
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    12.2 MP
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (12.2 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    12.2 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 0.3 in smaller screen diagonal
    Screen size
    2.7 in
    This camera has a smaller screen than the average camera (2.7 in vs 3 in). The average camera has a screen size of 3 in.
    2.7 in vs 3 in
  • 5 % lower viewfinder coverage
    Viewfinder coverage
    95 %
    This camera has a lower viewfinder coverage than the average camera (95 % vs 100 %). The average camera has viewfinder coverage of 100 %.
    95 % vs 100 %
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • Lower video resolution
    Max video resolution
    1,280 px
    This camera records lower-resolution video than the average camera (1280 px vs 1920 px). The average camera records at 1920 px.
    1280 px vs 1920 px
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
  • 2.7 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    3 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (3 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    3 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 0.3 in smaller screen diagonal
    Screen size
    2.7 in
    This camera has a smaller screen than the average camera (2.7 in vs 3 in). The average camera has a screen size of 3 in.
    2.7 in vs 3 in
  • 5 % lower viewfinder coverage
    Viewfinder coverage
    95 %
    This camera has a lower viewfinder coverage than the average camera (95 % vs 100 %). The average camera has viewfinder coverage of 100 %.
    95 % vs 100 %
  • 25.8 mm taller body
    Height
    99.7 mm
    This camera is taller than the average camera (99.7 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    99.7 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 100 g heavier
    Weight
    495 g
    This camera is heavier than the average camera (495 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    495 g vs 395 g
  • 31.9 mm thicker
    Thickness
    77.9 mm
    This camera is thicker than the average camera (77.9 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    77.9 mm vs 46 mm
  • 10 mm wider
    Width
    129.9 mm
    This camera is wider than the average camera (129.9 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    129.9 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    12.2 MP
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (12.2 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    12.2 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • 1.4 points lower DxOMark Landscape score
    DxOMark landscape score
    11.0 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark landscape score than the average camera (11 points vs 12.4 points). The average camera scores 12.4 points.
    11.0 points vs 12.4 points
  • 11 points lower DxOMark sensor score
    DxOMark sensor score
    62 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sensor score than the average camera (62 points vs 73 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sensor score of 73 points.
    62 points vs 73 points
  • 1.1 points lower DxOMark Portrait score
    DxOMark portrait score
    21.9 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark portrait score than the average camera (21.9 points vs 23 points). The average camera scores 23.0 points.
    21.9 points vs 23.0 points
  • 2 older
    Release date
    2011
    This camera is older than the average camera (2011 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    February 2011
    2,011 vs 2,013
  • 12,500 ISO lower extended sensitivity limit
    Max expanded ISO
    12,800 ISO
    This camera has a lower expanded ISO than the average camera (12800 ISO vs 25300 ISO). The average camera reaches an expanded ISO of 25300 ISO.
    12,800 ISO vs 25,300 ISO
  • 88 points lower DxOMark Sports score
    DxOMark sports score
    755 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sports score than the average camera (755 points vs 843 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sports score of 843 points.
    755 points vs 843 points
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    -0.5
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (-0.5 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    -0.5 vs -4
  • 2.7 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    3 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (3 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    3 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 14 fewer AF points
    N. of focus points
    9
    This camera has fewer focus points than the average camera (9 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    9 vs 23
  • Lower video resolution
    Max video resolution
    1,280 px
    This camera records lower-resolution video than the average camera (1280 px vs 1920 px). The average camera records at 1920 px.
    1280 px vs 1920 px
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2
  • 260 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    860 mAh
    This camera has a lower battery capacity than the average camera (860 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    860 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • Older HDMI version
    HDMI version
    1.3
    This camera uses HDMI 1.3, while the average camera uses HDMI 1.4.
    1.3 vs 1.4

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

D
dpreview.com
14/04/2011
Summary of the review
E
ephotozine.com
13/04/2011
Summary of the review
A
amateurphotographer.com
09/04/2011
Summary of the review
E
expertreviews.co.uk
04/04/2011
Summary of the review
T
the-digital-picture.com
28/06/2011
Summary of the review
D
dxomark.com
16/03/2011
Summary of the review
D
digital-photography-school.com
18/04/2011
Summary of the review
W
whatdigitalcamera.com
10/03/2011
Summary of the review
F
focus-review.com
01/05/2012
Summary of the review
R
radojuva.com
04/10/2012
Summary of the review
T
trustedreviews.com
21/07/2011
Summary of the review
I
imaging-resource.com
23/09/2011
Summary of the review
C
cnet.com
07/07/2011
Summary of the review
F
focus-review.com
01/05/2012
Summary of the review
U
uniquephoto.com
17/06/2011
Summary of the review
M
macworld.com
23/10/2011
Summary of the review
P
photoreview.com.au
12/04/2011
Summary of the review
M
myportraithub.com
13/06/2012
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
25/03/2011
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
29/04/2011
Summary of the review
D
digitalkamera.de
24/05/2011
Summary of the review
S
spiegelreflexkamera-tests.de
20/04/2020
Summary of the review
F
focus.de
03/08/2012
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
23/03/2013
Summary of the review
C
computerwoche.de
06/07/2011
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
29/03/2011
Summary of the review
W
webastro.net
13/04/2013
Summary of the review
H
happytobe.fr
11/03/2026
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
29/03/2011
Summary of the review
P
photographiesdelannee.com
18/01/2025
Summary of the review
R
radojuva.com
04/10/2012
Summary of the review
C
camaras.uno
20/08/2019
Summary of the review
A
aketdoy.es
29/08/2025
Summary of the review
R
radojuva.com
04/10/2012
Summary of the review
M
marcotogni.it
21/10/2026
Summary of the review
S
spider-mac.com
15/12/2011
Summary of the review
M
mauriziogiglio.info
25/03/2011
Summary of the review
F
fotocamerapro.it
26/06/2015
Summary of the review
D
digifotopro.nl
27/05/2011
Summary of the review
F
focus-review.com
01/05/2012
Summary of the review
E
eoszine.nl
04/04/2011
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
14/06/2014
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 1,902 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Canon EOS 1100D

  • Highly affordable price point, making it an excellent budget or entry-level choice
  • Lightweight and compact body structure that is easy to carry for travel
  • Simple and intuitive user interface with a beginner-friendly on-screen menu
  • Excellent battery life that outlasts many higher-end SLR competitors
  • Consistently reliable exposure metering and great overall image quality at base ISO
  • Accurate 9-point autofocus system when using the standard viewfinder

What we don't like about Canon EOS 1100D

  • Cheap plastic construction with a smooth finish and narrow grip that lacks rubber coating
  • Extremely basic video capabilities limited to 720p with no manual settings or external mic input
  • Very slow contrast-detect autofocus performance during live view and video recording
  • Small, low-resolution 2.7-inch LCD display screen
  • Slow continuous burst shooting speeds, which drop even further when shooting in RAW format
  • Awkwardly combined battery and memory card compartment located on the bottom plate

Verdict

The Canon EOS 1100D is an entry-level DSLR featuring a 12.2-megapixel APS-C CMOS sensor and a DIGIC 4 image processor, offering an ISO range of 100–6400 and a 9-point autofocus system. It includes beginner-friendly features like an on-screen Feature Guide, 63-zone iFCL exposure metering, and 720p HD video recording at up to 30 fps. Its main advantages are its impressive 700-shot battery life, lightweight 495g body, and intuitive 'Basic+' creative modes that simplify settings for novices. However, it is held back by a low-resolution 2.7-inch fixed LCD screen, a lack of built-in sensor cleaning, and a noticeably plastic build quality that lacks rubberised grips.

Compare Canon EOS 1100D with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Canon EOS 1100D and other products in the Cameras category

No results found