Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Sony A350 DSLR Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£90Sensor size:APS-CWeight:674 gBattery life (CIPA):730 shots

Sony A350 DSLR Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

4.9

Overall score

Score
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

4.6

Technical score

10%

8.1

User score

▼Worse than 61% of cameras
4.6

Technical score

Technical score
4.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

5.6

Sensor & Image

25%

5.1

Photo Features

18%

2.3

Video & Audio

14%

3.6

Display & Design

8%

8.3

Battery & Power

7%

2.0

Connectivity & Storage

▼Worse than 68% of cameras
8.1

User score

User score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.2

User ratings

30%

5.7

Number of reviews

Based on 32 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▲Better than 74% of cameras
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Sony A350 DSLR

Technical score
Technical score
4.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

5.6

Sensor & Image

25%

5.1

Photo Features

18%

2.3

Video & Audio

14%

3.6

Display & Design

8%

8.3

Battery & Power

7%

2.0

Connectivity & Storage

4.6
User score
User score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.2

User ratings

30%

5.7

Number of reviews

Based on 32 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.1
Popularity
Popularity
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Sony A350 DSLR has a popularity score of 5.7, which is higher than 61.4% of cameras.
5.7
Value for money
Value for money
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

4.9

Overall score

40%

10

Price

6.4
Sensor size
APS-C
Sensor size
APS-C
This camera uses a sensor classified as APS-C; it is larger than the sensor in 57.4% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 25.7% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
14.2 MP
Main camera megapixels
14.2 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 14.2 MP, which is lower than that of 73.3% of cameras and equal to that of 2.1% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
5.16 µm
Main camera pixel size
5.16 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 5.16 µm, which are larger than those in 85.2% of cameras and the same size as those in 0.6% of cameras.
Base ISO
100
Base ISO
100
This camera has a base ISO of 100 which is higher than that of 19.9% of cameras and equal to that of 52.4% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 3200 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 3,200
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 3,200, which is lower than that of 62.9% of cameras and equal to that of 22.7% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
Sony A
Built-in focus motor
yes
Built-in focus motor
yes
This camera has a built-in focus motor. 10.9% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
9
N. of focus points
9
This camera has 9 focus points, fewer than the number offered by 67.1% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 26% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
yes
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
yes
This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.3% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
no
AF tracking
no
This camera does not support AF tracking. 88.1% of cameras support this feature.
Show more
Max video resolution
N/A
Video bitrate
N/A
Video bit depth
N/A
Video chroma subsampling
N/A
Video codecs
N/A
Show more
Type
dslr
Weight
674 g
Weight
674 g
This camera weighs 674 g which is heavier than 80.7% of cameras.
Width
130.8 mm
Width
130.8 mm
This camera has a width of 130.8 mm which is wider than 74.1% of cameras and equal to that of 0.2% of cameras.
Height
98.5 mm
Height
98.5 mm
This camera has a height of 98.5 mm which is taller than 82.2% of cameras and equal to that of 0.3% of cameras.
Thickness
74.7 mm
Thickness
74.7 mm
This camera has a thickness of 74.7 mm which is thicker than 69% of cameras and equal to that of 0.1% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
730 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
730 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 730 shots, which is longer than that of 90.6% of cameras and equal to that of 0.1% of cameras.
Battery capacity
1,600 mAh
Battery capacity
1,600 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 1,600 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 73.5% of cameras and equal to those in 1.6% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This camera does not support Wi-Fi. 47.9% of cameras include this feature.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Sony A350 DSLR vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • In-body stabilization
    Sensor-shift stabilization
    yes
    This camera supports in-body stabilization, the average camera does not.
  • Phase-detect AF for photos
    Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
    yes
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos, the average camera does not.
  • 1.82 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    5.16 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (5.2 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    5.16 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 400 shots more shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    730 shots
    This camera has longer battery life than the average camera (730 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    730 shots vs 330 shots
  • Sensor cleaning system
    Sensor cleaning system
    yes
    This camera includes a sensor cleaning system, the average camera does not.
    Sensor-shift dust reduction.
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    optical
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (optical vs none).
    Pentamirror optical viewfinder.
    optical vs none
  • Built-in AF motor
    Built-in focus motor
    yes
    This camera has a built-in focus motor, the average camera does not.
  • 480 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    1,600 mAh
    This camera has a higher battery capacity than the average camera (1600 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    1,600 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • 3.22x cheaper
    Sony A350 DSLR is cheaper than the average camera (£90 vs £290).
    £90 vs £290
  • 1.8% higher user score
    User score
    8.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Sony A350 DSLR
    the average camera
    Sony A350 DSLR has a higher user score than the average camera (8.15 vs 8.000).
    8.15 vs 8
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    optical
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (optical vs none).
    Pentamirror optical viewfinder.
    optical vs none
  • 1.82 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    5.16 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (5.2 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    5.16 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • Sensor cleaning system
    Sensor cleaning system
    yes
    This camera includes a sensor cleaning system, the average camera does not.
    Sensor-shift dust reduction.
  • In-body stabilization
    Sensor-shift stabilization
    yes
    This camera supports in-body stabilization, the average camera does not.
  • Phase-detect AF for photos
    Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
    yes
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos, the average camera does not.
  • Built-in AF motor
    Built-in focus motor
    yes
    This camera has a built-in focus motor, the average camera does not.
  • 400 shots more shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    730 shots
    This camera has longer battery life than the average camera (730 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    730 shots vs 330 shots
  • 480 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    1,600 mAh
    This camera has a higher battery capacity than the average camera (1600 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    1,600 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • More versatile card slots
    Memory card slot types
    CF
    This camera uses more versatile card slots than the average camera (CF vs SD). The average camera supports SD memory card slot types.
    CF vs SD
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    0
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (0 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    0 vs -4
  • No AF tracking
    AF tracking
    no
    This camera does not support AF tracking, the average camera does. 88% of cameras support it.
  • 0.3 in smaller screen diagonal
    Screen size
    2.7 in
    This camera has a smaller screen than the average camera (2.7 in vs 3 in). The average camera has a screen size of 3 in.
    2.7 in vs 3 in
  • 5 % lower viewfinder coverage
    Viewfinder coverage
    95 %
    This camera has a lower viewfinder coverage than the average camera (95 % vs 100 %). The average camera has viewfinder coverage of 100 %.
    95 % vs 100 %
  • 2 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    0
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (0 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    0 vs 2
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
    no video recording
  • 0.3 in smaller screen diagonal
    Screen size
    2.7 in
    This camera has a smaller screen than the average camera (2.7 in vs 3 in). The average camera has a screen size of 3 in.
    2.7 in vs 3 in
  • 5 % lower viewfinder coverage
    Viewfinder coverage
    95 %
    This camera has a lower viewfinder coverage than the average camera (95 % vs 100 %). The average camera has viewfinder coverage of 100 %.
    95 % vs 100 %
  • 279 g heavier
    Weight
    674 g
    This camera is heavier than the average camera (674 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    674 g vs 395 g
  • 24.6 mm taller body
    Height
    98.5 mm
    This camera is taller than the average camera (98.5 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    98.5 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 10.9 mm wider
    Width
    130.8 mm
    This camera is wider than the average camera (130.8 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    130.8 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • 28.7 mm thicker
    Thickness
    74.7 mm
    This camera is thicker than the average camera (74.7 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    74.7 mm vs 46 mm
  • 0.04 x less viewfinder magnification
    Viewfinder magnification
    0.74 x
    This camera has a lower viewfinder magnification than the average camera (0.7 x vs 0.78 x). The average camera has a viewfinder magnification of 0.78 x.
    0.74 x vs 0.78 x
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    14.2 MP
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (14.2 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    14.2 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 8 points lower DxOMark sensor score
    DxOMark sensor score
    65 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sensor score than the average camera (65 points vs 73 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sensor score of 73 points.
    65 points vs 73 points
  • 0.9 points lower DxOMark Landscape score
    DxOMark landscape score
    11.5 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark landscape score than the average camera (11.5 points vs 12.4 points). The average camera scores 12.4 points.
    11.5 points vs 12.4 points
  • 5 older
    Release date
    2008
    This camera is older than the average camera (2008 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    March 2008
    2,008 vs 2,013
  • 3,200 ISO lower maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    3,200 ISO
    This camera has a lower maximum sensitivity than the average camera (3200 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    3,200 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • 248 points lower DxOMark Sports score
    DxOMark sports score
    595 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sports score than the average camera (595 points vs 843 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sports score of 843 points.
    595 points vs 843 points
  • 0.4 points lower DxOMark Portrait score
    DxOMark portrait score
    22.6 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark portrait score than the average camera (22.6 points vs 23 points). The average camera scores 23.0 points.
    22.6 points vs 23.0 points
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    0
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (0 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    0 vs -4
  • No AF tracking
    AF tracking
    no
    This camera does not support AF tracking, the average camera does. 88% of cameras support it.
  • 3.2 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    2.5 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (2.5 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    2.5 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 14 fewer AF points
    N. of focus points
    9
    This camera has fewer focus points than the average camera (9 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    9 vs 23
  • 50,000 fewer shutter cycles
    Shutter durability rating
    50,000
    This camera has a lower shutter durability than the average camera (50,000 vs 100,000). The average camera is rated for 100,000 shutter cycles.
    unofficial estimate
    50,000 vs 100,000
  • 2 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    0
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (0 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    0 vs 2
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
    no video recording
  • No HDMI output
    HDMI output
    no
    This camera does not support HDMI output, the average camera does. 78.7% of cameras support HDMI output.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

D
dpreview.com
06/06/2008
Summary of the review
C
cameralabs.com
07/04/2008
Summary of the review
T
trustedreviews.com
10/06/2008
Summary of the review
C
cnet.com
08/04/2008
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
06/05/2008
Summary of the review
P
photographybay.com
11/05/2008
Summary of the review
W
whatdigitalcamera.com
01/05/2008
Summary of the review
S
skyatnightmagazine.com
20/01/2012
Summary of the review
P
photoreview.com.au
No Date Provided
Summary of the review
P
photoclassic.co.uk
No Date Provided
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
12/03/2008
Summary of the review
D
digitalkamera.de
01/05/2008
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
23/04/2008
Summary of the review
A
avguide.ch
07/05/2008
Summary of the review
C
connect-living.de
11/04/2008
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
25/03/2008
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
11/03/2008
Summary of the review
C
cnetfrance.fr
16/05/2008
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
11/03/2008
Summary of the review
X
xataka.com
28/03/2008
Summary of the review
X
xataka.com
05/06/2008
Summary of the review
X
xatakafoto.com
02/06/2008
Summary of the review
N
nadir.it
21/10/2026
Summary of the review
F
fotografidigitali.it
15/07/2008
Summary of the review
J
juzaphoto.com
21/10/2026
Summary of the review
D
digifotopro.nl
30/05/2008
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 32 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Sony A350 DSLR

  • High 14.2-megapixel resolution offers excellent detail at low ISO settings
  • Innovative fast autofocus Live View system with a dedicated secondary sensor
  • Tilting 2.7-inch LCD screen makes overhead and low-angle shooting easy
  • In-body Super SteadyShot image stabilization works with all attached lenses
  • Beautiful colors and film-like rendering from the CCD image sensor
  • Excellent battery life and long-lasting performance
  • Ergonomic design with a comfortable grip and a simple, user-friendly menu layout
  • Backward compatibility with affordable legacy Minolta A-mount autofocus lenses

What we don't like about Sony A350 DSLR

  • Poor low-light performance and high digital noise at ISO settings above 400
  • Slow continuous burst shooting speed limited to 2 to 2.5 frames per second
  • Noticeably small and cramped optical viewfinder compared to similar DSLRs
  • Total lack of video recording capabilities
  • Soft image sharpness and high distortion when using the standard kit lens
  • Slow camera startup, shutdown, and file write speeds
  • Reliance on older, less common CompactFlash (CF) memory cards
  • The tilting screen housing physically obstructs easy access to the viewfinder

Verdict

The Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 is a mid-range APS-C digital SLR featuring a high-resolution 14.2-megapixel CCD sensor and a BIONZ image processor. Its standout characteristic is a unique Quick AF Live View system that uses a dedicated secondary sensor to maintain fast, phase-detection autofocus while framing through the 2.7-inch tilting LCD. Key pros include the versatile articulated screen, effective 'SteadyShot INSIDE' sensor-shift image stabilization compatible with all A-mount lenses, and impressive battery life rated for up to 730 shots. However, the camera suffers from a noticeably small optical viewfinder with only 0.74x magnification, limited continuous shooting speeds of 2.5 fps (dropping to 2 fps in Live View), and significant image noise and detail smearing at higher ISO settings above 400.

Compare Sony A350 DSLR with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Sony A350 DSLR and other products in the Cameras category

No results found