OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Smartwatches Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 3,488 independent expert reviews and 5,037 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v2.0

Verizon Gizmowatch Review | 126 Data compared

Avg. price:~£120Screen size:?Battery life:3 daysDisplay type:AMOLED

Verizon Gizmowatch Review: Compare 126 technical specifications and 1 expert reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

5.4

Overall score

Score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartwatch's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartwatches on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
Score components

70%

4.6

Technical score

30%

7.3

Review score

Review score 30% · 7.3 · based on 1 written review
1 written review counts as 1 of the 5 needed; the rest counts as 7/10. Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 30%, technical score 70%. A video or a short review counts less than a full test.
â–¼Worse than 91% of smartwatches
4.6

Technical score

Technical score
4.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
Score components

24%

1.0

Health

21%

4.9

Fitness

16%

6.1

Battery

14%

6.1

Smart features

12%

6.0

Connectivity

9%

6.3

Display & Design

4%

5.9

Hardware

â–¼Worse than 92% of smartwatches
7.3

Review score

Review score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
Grades by review (1)
✓ explicit
1

20%

8.5

safewise.com

1 review, with a printed score. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 68% of smartwatches
  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £120

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Verizon Gizmowatch

Technical score
Technical score
4.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
Score components:

24%

1.0

Health

21%

4.9

Fitness

16%

6.1

Battery

14%

6.1

Smart features

12%

6.0

Connectivity

9%

6.3

Display & Design

4%

5.9

Hardware

4.6
Review score
Review score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
Grades by review (1)
✓ explicit
1

20%

8.5

safewise.com

1 review, with a printed score. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
7.3
Value for money
Value for money
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
Score components:

60%

5.4

Overall score

40%

9.9

Price

6.8
Brand name
Verizon
Heart rate monitor
no
Heart rate monitor
no
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
This smartwatch does not include a heart rate monitor. 89.6% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
no
Blood oxygen monitoring
no
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
This smartwatch does not support blood oxygen monitoring. 66.8% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
ECG
no
â–¼ Worse than 17% of models
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings. 48.2% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
Show more
Accelerometer
yes
Accelerometer
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.6% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
yes
Barometer
yes
â–² Better than 51% of models
This smartwatch includes a barometer. 50.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
no
Gyroscope
no
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
This smartwatch does not include a gyroscope. 70% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
no
Cadence sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 31.2% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
Distance tracking
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 4.1% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
Battery life
3 days
Battery life
3 days
â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch offers a battery life of 3 days which is shorter than that of 74.8% of smartwatches and equal to that of 3.9% of smartwatches.
Battery life in training mode
4 h
Battery life in training mode
4 h
â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
This smartwatch lasts 4 h in training mode which is shorter than 94.4% of smartwatches and equal to that of 2.4% of smartwatches.
Battery life with GPS on
?
Battery power
510 mAh
Battery power
510 mAh
★ Better than 95% of models
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a battery capacity of 510 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 94.5% of smartwatches and equal to those in 0.4% of smartwatches.
Charge time
70 min
Charge time
70 min
â–² Better than 80% of models
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges in 70 min which is faster than 79.7% of smartwatches and equal to the charge time of 1% of smartwatches.
Show more
Operating system
Android
Operating system
Android
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
This smartwatch runs Android which is less advanced than the operating system in 96.4% of smartwatches and the same as that in 1.3% of smartwatches.
Software update frequency
?
Third-party app support
no
Third-party app support
no
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
This smartwatch does not support third-party apps. 47.7% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
Voice assistant support
yes
â–² Better than 32% of models
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 32.4% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
Cellular module
yes
Cellular module
yes
â–² Better than 82% of models
This smartwatch includes a cellular module. 82.2% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
1
SIM cards
1
â–² Better than 2% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This smartwatch uses 1 for cellular connectivity which is more advanced than that of 2% of smartwatches and the same as that of 98% of smartwatches.
eSIM
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
â–² Better than 44% of models
This smartwatch supports GPS. 43.9% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
â–¼ Worse than 39% of models
This smartwatch does not support Galileo navigation. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Compass
no
Compass
no
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This smartwatch does not include a compass. 52.7% of smartwatches include a compass.
Show more
Screen size
?
Display type
AMOLED
Display type
AMOLED
â–² Better than 50% of models
This smartwatch uses a AMOLED display type which is more advanced than that of 49.9% of smartwatches and the same as that of 50.1% of smartwatches.
Resolution
240x 240
Resolution
240x 240
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 240x240 which is lower than that of 73.9% of smartwatches and equal to that of 15.2% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
?
Display brightness
?
Show more
CPU speed
1 GHz
CPU speed
1 GHz
â–¼ Worse than 40% of models
This smartwatch uses a CPU configuration of 1 GHz which is faster than that in 29.2% of smartwatches and equal to that in 31.2% of smartwatches.
Processor model
Snapdragon Wear 2100
Processor model
Snapdragon Wear 2100
â–² Better than 45% of models
This smartwatch uses the Snapdragon Wear 2100 processor model.
RAM
1 GB
RAM
1 GB
â–² Better than 31% of models
Market range: <0.5 GB – >2 GB
This smartwatch has 1 GB of RAM which is larger than the RAM in 31.3% of smartwatches and equal to that of 45.8% of smartwatches.
Internal storage
8 GB
Internal storage
8 GB
â–² Better than 68% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch uses 8 GB for internal storage which is larger than that of 67.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 12.1% of smartwatches.
External memory slot
no
External memory slot
no
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Verizon Gizmowatch vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • Built-in cellular module
    Cellular module
    yes
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    This smartwatch includes a cellular module, the average smartwatch does not. 17.9% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
  • 50 min shorter charge time
    Charge time
    70 min
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    Market range: <60 min – >150 min
    This smartwatch charges faster than the average smartwatch (70 min vs 120 min). The average smartwatch charges in 120 min.
    70 min vs 120 min
  • Emergency SOS
    Emergency SOS
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch includes Emergency SOS, the average smartwatch does not. 42.8% of smartwatches include Emergency SOS.
  • Supports wireless charging
    Wireless charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    This smartwatch supports wireless charging, the average smartwatch does not. 24.5% of smartwatches support wireless charging.
  • Barometer sensor included
    Barometer
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This smartwatch includes a barometer, the average smartwatch does not. 49.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    Wi-Fi support
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.3% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • 210 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery life
    510 mAh days
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch has a larger battery capacity than the average smartwatch (510 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    510 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • Rugged construction
    Rugged design
    yes
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This smartwatch has a rugged design, the average smartwatch does not. 37.9% of smartwatches have a rugged design.
  • Barometer sensor included
    Barometer
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This smartwatch includes a barometer, the average smartwatch does not. 49.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • 50 min shorter charge time
    Charge time
    70 min
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    Market range: <60 min – >150 min
    This smartwatch charges faster than the average smartwatch (70 min vs 120 min). The average smartwatch charges in 120 min.
    70 min vs 120 min
  • Supports wireless charging
    Wireless charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    This smartwatch supports wireless charging, the average smartwatch does not. 24.5% of smartwatches support wireless charging.
  • 210 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery life
    510 mAh days
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch has a larger battery capacity than the average smartwatch (510 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    510 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • Built-in cellular module
    Cellular module
    yes
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    This smartwatch includes a cellular module, the average smartwatch does not. 17.9% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    Wi-Fi support
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.3% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • Rugged construction
    Rugged design
    yes
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This smartwatch has a rugged design, the average smartwatch does not. 37.9% of smartwatches have a rugged design.
  • Kid-friendly design
    Kid-friendly design
    yes
    ★ Better than 99% of models
    This smartwatch has a kid-friendly design, the average smartwatch does not. 1.6% of smartwatches have a kid-friendly design.
    Kid-focused model with child-specific controls/features.
  • Emergency SOS
    Emergency SOS
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch includes Emergency SOS, the average smartwatch does not. 42.8% of smartwatches include Emergency SOS.
  • No blood oxygen monitoring
    Blood oxygen monitoring
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartwatch does not support blood oxygen monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 66.7% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
  • No multi-sport mode
    Multi-sport mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a multi-sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 68.4% of smartwatches include a multi-sport mode.
  • No heart rate monitor
    Heart rate monitor
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a heart rate monitor, the average smartwatch does. 89.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
  • No stress monitoring
    Stress monitoring
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    This smartwatch does not support stress monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 65.4% of smartwatches support stress monitoring.
  • No elevation tracking
    Elevation tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartwatch does not support elevation tracking, the average smartwatch does. 64.3% of smartwatches support elevation tracking.
  • 49 m lower water resistance depth
    Waterproof depth rating
    1 m
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <1 m – >50 m
    This smartwatch has a shallower waterproof rating than the average smartwatch (1 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch reaches 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1 m vs 50 m
  • No automatic activity detection
    Automatic activity detection
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    This smartwatch does not support automatic activity detection, the average smartwatch does. 79.7% of smartwatches support automatic activity detection.
  • No sleep tracking
    Sleep tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    This smartwatch does not support sleep tracking, the average smartwatch does. 93.1% of smartwatches support sleep tracking.
  • 6.12x less popular
    Verizon Gizmowatch has a lower popularity than the average smartwatch (1 vs 6.1).
    1 vs 6.12
  • 11% worse value for money
    Verizon Gizmowatch has a lower value-for-money score than the average smartwatch (6.78 vs 7.5).
    6.78 vs 7.52
  • No blood oxygen monitoring
    Blood oxygen monitoring
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartwatch does not support blood oxygen monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 66.7% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
  • No heart rate monitor
    Heart rate monitor
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a heart rate monitor, the average smartwatch does. 89.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
  • No stress monitoring
    Stress monitoring
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    This smartwatch does not support stress monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 65.4% of smartwatches support stress monitoring.
  • No sleep tracking
    Sleep tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    This smartwatch does not support sleep tracking, the average smartwatch does. 93.1% of smartwatches support sleep tracking.
  • No cycle tracking
    Menstrual cycle tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartwatch does not support menstrual cycle tracking, the average smartwatch does. 64.3% of smartwatches support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • No smart scale support
    Smart scale compatibility
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support smart scale compatibility, the average smartwatch does. 53.7% of smartwatches support smart scale compatibility.
  • No inactivity alerts
    Inactivity alerts
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    This smartwatch does not support inactivity alerts, the average smartwatch does. 91.7% of smartwatches support inactivity alerts.
  • No multi-sport mode
    Multi-sport mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a multi-sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 68.4% of smartwatches include a multi-sport mode.
  • No elevation tracking
    Elevation tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartwatch does not support elevation tracking, the average smartwatch does. 64.3% of smartwatches support elevation tracking.
  • No automatic activity detection
    Automatic activity detection
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    This smartwatch does not support automatic activity detection, the average smartwatch does. 79.7% of smartwatches support automatic activity detection.
  • No pace tracking
    Pace tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    This smartwatch does not support pace tracking, the average smartwatch does. 78.6% of smartwatches support pace tracking.
  • No coaching features
    Coaching
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 54.6% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • No auto-pause
    Auto pause
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This smartwatch does not support auto pause, the average smartwatch does. 59.3% of smartwatches support auto pause.
  • No gyroscope
    Gyroscope
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a gyroscope, the average smartwatch does. 69.9% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
  • No swim mode
    Swim sport mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a swim sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 74.9% of smartwatches include a swim sport mode.
  • 75 fewer exercise profiles
    Multi-sport mode
    5
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartwatch supports fewer exercise modes than the average smartwatch (5 vs 80). The average smartwatch supports 80 exercise modes.
    5 vs 80
  • No exercise tagging
    Exercise tagging
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
    This smartwatch does not support exercise tagging, the average smartwatch does. 93.6% of smartwatches support exercise tagging.
  • 15.25 h shorter training battery life
    Battery life in training mode
    4 h
    â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
    Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
    This smartwatch lasts less in training mode than the average smartwatch (4 h vs 19.25 h). The average smartwatch lasts 19.25 h.
    4 h vs 19.25 h
  • 4 days day/s shorter battery life
    Battery life
    3 days
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 3 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    3 days vs 7 days
  • No compass
    Compass
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a compass, the average smartwatch does. 52.6% of smartwatches include a compass.
  • 49 m lower water resistance depth
    Waterproof depth rating
    1 m
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <1 m – >50 m
    This smartwatch has a shallower waterproof rating than the average smartwatch (1 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch reaches 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1 m vs 50 m
  • No always-on display
    Always-On Display
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not have an always-on display, the average smartwatch does. 67.6% of smartwatches have an always-on display.
  • No ambient light sensor
    Ambient light sensor
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This smartwatch does not include an ambient light sensor, the average smartwatch does. 60.7% of smartwatches include an ambient light sensor.
  • 3.4 mm thicker watch body
    Thickness
    15 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
    Market range: <9.8 mm – >14.1 mm
    This smartwatch is thicker than the average smartwatch (15 mm vs 11.6 mm). The average smartwatch thickness is 11.6 mm.
    Some sources mention variant-dependent thickness values.
    15 mm vs 11.6 mm
  • Lower resolution
    Display type
    240 x 240
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 240x240, while the average smartwatch reaches 352x430.
    240x240 vs 352x430
  • Less practical form
    Form
    rectangular
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This smartwatch uses a rectangular form, while the average smartwatch uses round.
    rectangular vs round
  • 2 mm taller watch height
    Height
    47.0 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <39.5 mm – >51 mm
    This smartwatch is taller than the average smartwatch (47 mm vs 45 mm). The average smartwatch height is 45 mm.
    47.0 mm vs 45 mm
  • No music playback
    Music playback
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 54.2% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No calendar sync
    Calendar sync
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    This smartwatch does not support calendar sync, the average smartwatch does. 94.8% of smartwatches support calendar sync.
  • No smart alarm
    Smart alarm
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 52.7% of smartwatches support smart alarms.
  • Less advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Android
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
    This smartwatch runs a less advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Android vs Proprietary OS).
    Android vs Proprietary OS
  • No widget support
    Widget support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This smartwatch does not support widgets, the average smartwatch does. 83.1% of smartwatches support widgets.
  • 3 year/s older release date
    Release date
    2018
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This smartwatch is an older model than the average smartwatch (2018 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    October 2018
    2018 vs 2021

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
Sean's DIY & Reviews
≈ estimated
29/06/2020
Unboxing · first look at design, tracking and charger
Verdict
Verizon Gizmowatch's monthly plan is hard to beat for the peace of mind it gives.
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.5
safewise.com
✓ explicit
03/03/2026
Hands-on tests · Kids smartwatch
Verdict
The Verizon Gizmo Watch 3 is the kids' watch to pick for video calls, but it needs a Verizon plan and holds only 20 contacts.
safewise.com
07/11/2025
Same outlet as a graded review (counted once)

Third-party reviews

What we like about Verizon Gizmowatch

  • Comprehensive parental controls including geofencing and real-time tracking via the [GizmoHub app](https://www.verizon.com/about/parenting/gizmo-watch-for-kids)
  • Secure communication limited to a [parent-approved contact list](https://www.safewise.com/gizmowatch-review/) (up to 20 contacts on GizmoWatch 3)
  • Durable and kid-friendly design with [IP68/IP67 water resistance](https://uk.pcmag.com/migrated-99802-smartwatches/147317/verizon-gizmo-watch-3) for everyday play
  • Ease of use for young children with intuitive touch interfaces and voice messaging
  • Peace of mind with a [dedicated SOS button](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MzA-fQP2SVs) for emergencies
  • Reasonable monthly service fee (typically around $10) for Verizon customers

What we don't like about Verizon Gizmowatch

  • Charging issues reported, including [grime buildup on contact pins](https://www.reddit.com/r/Parenting/comments/wygkmi/gizmo_watch_users_what_have_been_the_pros_and/) requiring regular cleaning
  • Battery life varies significantly; heavy GPS use can [drain it within a single day](https://straphabit.com/blogs/straphabit-reviews/verizon-gizmo-watch-3-smart-watch-review-qtax57nr)
  • GPS accuracy can be [inconsistent indoors](https://straphabit.com/blogs/straphabit-reviews/verizon-gizmo-watch-3-smart-watch-review-qtax57nr) or slow to update initial locations
  • Lack of entertainment features like [music streaming](https://uk.pcmag.com/migrated-99802-smartwatches/147317/verizon-gizmo-watch-3) or robust gaming apps
  • Exclusivity to the [Verizon network](https://www.xda-developers.com/gizmo-watch-3-review/) limits options for families on other carriers
  • Interoperability limitations, as messaging requires all contacts to [download the GizmoHub app](Use code with caution.jsonhttps://www.jefftk.com/p/gizmo-watch-reviewUse code with caution.json)

Verdict

The Verizon Gizmo Watch 3 is a specialized 4G LTE smartwatch for children featuring a 1.41-inch AMOLED display (320 x 360 pixels), a Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 4100 processor, 1GB of RAM, and 8GB of internal storage. Main characteristics include an IP68 water-resistance rating, real-time GPS tracking with geofencing, and a 5MP front-facing camera for video calls and photos. Its primary pros are robust parental controls through the GizmoHub app, a dedicated SOS button, and a contact limit of up to 20 pre-approved numbers to ensure a secure communication environment without open internet access. However, notable cons include an average battery life that typically lasts only 1–2 days with active tracking, a bulky design for smaller wrists, and the lack of a music player or third-party app support.

Compare Verizon Gizmowatch with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Verizon Gizmowatch and other Smartwatches

No results found