OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Smartwatches Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 3,488 independent expert reviews and 5,192 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v2.0

Amazfit GTR 2 2022 Review | 126 Data compared

Avg. price:~£120Screen size:1.39 inchBattery life:12.5 daysDisplay type:AMOLED

Amazfit GTR 2 2022 Review: Compare 126 technical specifications and 4 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

7.4

Overall score

Score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartwatch's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartwatches on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 72% of models
Score components

70%

7.3

Technical score

30%

7.6

Review score ( 0 · 4)

Review score 30% · 7.6 · based on 4 videos
4 videos count as 2 of the 5 needed; the rest counts as 7/10. Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 30%, technical score 70%. A video or a short review counts less than a full test.
â–²Better than 72% of smartwatches
7.3

Technical score

Technical score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 74% of models
Score components

24%

7.0

Health

21%

8.1

Fitness

16%

7.6

Battery

14%

7.1

Smart features

12%

6.5

Connectivity

9%

7.4

Display & Design

4%

7.0

Hardware

â–²Better than 74% of smartwatches
7.6

Review score

Review score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
Grades by review (4)
4 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Video reviews 1

10%

8.0

Léo Moreira - Reviews

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 56% of smartwatches
  • amazfit-gtr-2-2022
  • amazfit-gtr-2-2022
  • amazfit-gtr-2-2022
  • amazfit-gtr-2-2022
  • amazfit-gtr-2-2022
  • amazfit-gtr-2-2022
  • amazfit-gtr-2-2022
  • amazfit-gtr-2-2022
  • amazfit-gtr-2-2022
  • amazfit-gtr-2-2022
  • amazfit-gtr-2-2022
  • amazfit-gtr-2-2022
  • amazfit-gtr-2-2022
  • amazfit-gtr-2-2022
amazfit-gtr-2-2022
amazfit-gtr-2-2022
amazfit-gtr-2-2022
amazfit-gtr-2-2022
amazfit-gtr-2-2022
amazfit-gtr-2-2022
amazfit-gtr-2-2022
amazfit-gtr-2-2022
amazfit-gtr-2-2022
amazfit-gtr-2-2022
amazfit-gtr-2-2022
amazfit-gtr-2-2022
amazfit-gtr-2-2022
amazfit-gtr-2-2022

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Amazfit GTR 2 2022

Technical score
Technical score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 74% of models
Score components:

24%

7.0

Health

21%

8.1

Fitness

16%

7.6

Battery

14%

7.1

Smart features

12%

6.5

Connectivity

9%

7.4

Display & Design

4%

7.0

Hardware

7.3
Review score
Review score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
Grades by review (4)
4 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Video reviews 1

10%

8.0

Léo Moreira - Reviews

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
7.6
Popularity
Popularity
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartwatch.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 63% of models
Popularity:
Amazfit GTR 2 2022 has a popularity of 7.4 points, which is higher than 62.7% of smartwatches.
7.4
Value for money
Value for money
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 74% of models
Score components:

60%

7.4

Overall score

40%

9.9

Price

8.1
Brand name
Amazfit
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
â–² Better than 11% of models
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 10.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
â–² Better than 33% of models
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 33.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
ECG
no
â–¼ Worse than 17% of models
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
â–² Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings. 51.9% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
Show more
Accelerometer
yes
Accelerometer
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.6% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
yes
Barometer
yes
â–² Better than 51% of models
This smartwatch includes a barometer. 50.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
Gyroscope
yes
â–² Better than 30% of models
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 30.2% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
no
Cadence sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 31.2% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
Distance tracking
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 4.1% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
Battery life
12.5 days
Battery life
12.5 days
â–² Better than 76% of models
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch offers a battery life of 12.5 days which is longer than that of 75.9% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.4% of smartwatches.
Battery life in training mode
48 h
Battery life in training mode
48 h
â–² Better than 89% of models
Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
This smartwatch lasts 48 h in training mode which is longer than 89.1% of smartwatches and equal to that of 2.7% of smartwatches.
Battery life with GPS on
48 h
Battery life with GPS on
48 h
★ Better than 91% of models
Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
This smartwatch lasts 48 h with GPS on which is longer than 91% of smartwatches and equal to that of 1.9% of smartwatches.
Battery power
471 mAh
Battery power
471 mAh
â–² Better than 89% of models
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a battery capacity of 471 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 89.2% of smartwatches and equal to those in 0.3% of smartwatches.
Charge time
150 min
Charge time
150 min
â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges in 150 min which is slower than 88.7% of smartwatches and equal to the charge time of 7.2% of smartwatches.
Approximate value from reported charging range: 150 minutes.
Show more
Operating system
Zepp OS
Operating system
Zepp OS
â–² Better than 60% of models
This smartwatch runs Zepp OS which is more advanced than the operating system in 60.2% of smartwatches and the same as that in 6.5% of smartwatches.
OS detail: Zepp OS (3).
Software update frequency
occasional
Software update frequency
occasional
â–² Better than 58% of models
This smartwatch has occasional software update support which is more active than that of 57.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 36.2% of smartwatches.
Third-party app support
yes
Third-party app support
yes
â–² Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports third-party apps. 52.4% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
Voice assistant support
yes
â–² Better than 32% of models
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 32.4% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
Cellular module
no
â–¼ Worse than 18% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 18% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
â–² Better than 44% of models
This smartwatch supports GPS. 43.9% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
â–¼ Worse than 39% of models
This smartwatch does not support Galileo navigation. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Compass
yes
Compass
yes
â–² Better than 47% of models
This smartwatch includes a compass. 47.5% of smartwatches include a compass.
Show more
Screen size
1.39 inch
Screen size
1.39 inch
â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
This smartwatch has a screen size of 1.39 inch which is smaller than the screens of 51.3% of smartwatches and equal to those of 9.5% of smartwatches.
Display type
AMOLED
Display type
AMOLED
â–² Better than 50% of models
This smartwatch uses a AMOLED display type which is more advanced than that of 49.9% of smartwatches and the same as that of 50.1% of smartwatches.
Resolution
454x 454
Resolution
454x 454
â–² Better than 80% of models
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 454x454 which is higher than that of 79.9% of smartwatches and equal to that of 6.7% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
462 ppi
Pixel density
462 ppi
★ Better than 91% of models
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 462 ppi which is higher than that of 91.1% of smartwatches and equal to that of 5% of smartwatches.
Display brightness
450 nits
Display brightness
450 nits
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
This smartwatch reaches 450 nits of display brightness, which is lower than that of 86.2% of smartwatches and equal to that of 6.5% of smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
?
Processor model
?
RAM
?
Internal storage
3 GB
Internal storage
3 GB
â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch uses 3 GB for internal storage which is smaller than that of 59.8% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.8% of smartwatches.
External memory slot
no
External memory slot
no
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Amazfit GTR 2 2022 vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • 28 h longer GPS battery life
    Battery life with GPS on
    48 h
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
    This smartwatch lasts longer with GPS on than the average smartwatch (48 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h.
    48 h vs 20 h
  • 28.75 h longer training battery life
    Battery life in training mode
    48 h
    â–² Better than 89% of models
    Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
    This smartwatch lasts longer in training mode than the average smartwatch (48 h vs 19.25 h). The average smartwatch lasts 19.25 h.
    48 h vs 19.25 h
  • Readiness score
    Readiness score
    yes
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    This smartwatch supports readiness scores, the average smartwatch does not. 17.5% of smartwatches support readiness scores.
  • HRV tracking
    HRV tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 40.8% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • VO2 max measurement
    VO2 max measurement
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch measures VO2 max, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • 5.5 days day/s longer battery life
    Battery life
    12.5 days
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 12.5 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    12.5 days vs 7 days
  • NFC functionality
    NFC
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 43.4% of smartwatches support NFC.
    NFC hardware is present, but functionality may be limited by region/app support.
  • Third-party app support
    Third-party app support
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports third-party apps, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • Readiness score
    Readiness score
    yes
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    This smartwatch supports readiness scores, the average smartwatch does not. 17.5% of smartwatches support readiness scores.
  • HRV tracking
    HRV tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 40.8% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • VO2 max measurement
    VO2 max measurement
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch measures VO2 max, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • Irregular heart rate alerts
    Irregular heart rate warnings
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does not. 48.1% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • Calorie tracking
    Calorie tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.6% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
    Food logging may require a companion or third-party app.
  • Barometer sensor included
    Barometer
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This smartwatch includes a barometer, the average smartwatch does not. 49.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • 28 h longer GPS battery life
    Battery life with GPS on
    48 h
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
    This smartwatch lasts longer with GPS on than the average smartwatch (48 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h.
    48 h vs 20 h
  • 28.75 h longer training battery life
    Battery life in training mode
    48 h
    â–² Better than 89% of models
    Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
    This smartwatch lasts longer in training mode than the average smartwatch (48 h vs 19.25 h). The average smartwatch lasts 19.25 h.
    48 h vs 19.25 h
  • 5.5 days day/s longer battery life
    Battery life
    12.5 days
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 12.5 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    12.5 days vs 7 days
  • 171 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery life
    471 mAh days
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch has a larger battery capacity than the average smartwatch (471 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    471 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • NFC functionality
    NFC
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 43.4% of smartwatches support NFC.
    NFC hardware is present, but functionality may be limited by region/app support.
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    Wi-Fi support
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.3% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
    Wi-Fi is supported with limited use scope (e.g., updates/transfer).
  • 136 ppi higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    462 ppi
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
    This smartwatch has a higher pixel density than the average smartwatch (462 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch display reaches 326 ppi.
    462 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • 13 g lighter weight
    Weight
    32.0 g
    â–² Better than 81% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is lighter than the average smartwatch (32 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    Weight refers to watch case without strap/band.
    32.0 g vs 45.0 g
  • Better case material
    Case material
    aluminum, stainless steel
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    This smartwatch uses aluminum, stainless steel for the case material, while the average smartwatch uses polycarbonate.
    aluminum, stainless steel vs polycarbonate
  • Higher resolution
    Display type
    454 x 454
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 454x454, while the average smartwatch reaches 352x430.
    454x454 vs 352x430
  • 0.9 mm thinner watch body
    Thickness
    10.70 mm
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <9.8 mm – >14.1 mm
    This smartwatch is thinner than the average smartwatch (10.7 mm vs 11.6 mm). The average smartwatch thickness is 11.6 mm.
    10.70 mm vs 11.6 mm
  • Better band material
    Band material
    silicone, leather
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch uses silicone, leather for the band material, while the average smartwatch uses silicone.
    silicone, leather vs silicone
  • Third-party app support
    Third-party app support
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports third-party apps, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • More frequent updates
    Software update frequency
    occasional
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    This smartwatch receives occasional software updates, while the average smartwatch receives ended updates.
    occasional vs ended
  • More advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Zepp OS
    â–² Better than 60% of models
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Zepp OS vs Proprietary OS).
    OS detail: Zepp OS (3).
    Zepp OS vs Proprietary OS
  • No multi-sport mode
    Multi-sport mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a multi-sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 68.4% of smartwatches include a multi-sport mode.
  • No coaching features
    Coaching
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 54.6% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • No cycle tracking
    Menstrual cycle tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartwatch does not support menstrual cycle tracking, the average smartwatch does. 64.3% of smartwatches support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • 150 nits lower display brightness
    Display brightness
    450 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
    This smartwatch has lower display brightness than the average smartwatch (450 nits vs 600 nits). The average smartwatch reaches 600 nits.
    450 nits vs 600 nits
  • 30 min longer charge time
    Charge time
    150 min
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <60 min – >150 min
    This smartwatch charges slower than the average smartwatch (150 min vs 120 min). The average smartwatch charges in 120 min.
    Approximate value from reported charging range: 150 minutes.
    150 min vs 120 min
  • No smart alarm
    Smart alarm
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 52.7% of smartwatches support smart alarms.
  • 4.4 mm wider watch width
    Width
    46.4 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <34.6 mm – >46.8 mm
    This smartwatch is wider than the average smartwatch (46.4 mm vs 42 mm). The average smartwatch width is 42.0 mm.
    46.4 mm vs 42.0 mm
  • No cycle tracking
    Menstrual cycle tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartwatch does not support menstrual cycle tracking, the average smartwatch does. 64.3% of smartwatches support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • No multi-sport mode
    Multi-sport mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a multi-sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 68.4% of smartwatches include a multi-sport mode.
  • No coaching features
    Coaching
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 54.6% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • 30 min longer charge time
    Charge time
    150 min
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <60 min – >150 min
    This smartwatch charges slower than the average smartwatch (150 min vs 120 min). The average smartwatch charges in 120 min.
    Approximate value from reported charging range: 150 minutes.
    150 min vs 120 min
  • 150 nits lower display brightness
    Display brightness
    450 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
    This smartwatch has lower display brightness than the average smartwatch (450 nits vs 600 nits). The average smartwatch reaches 600 nits.
    450 nits vs 600 nits
  • 4.4 mm wider watch width
    Width
    46.4 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <34.6 mm – >46.8 mm
    This smartwatch is wider than the average smartwatch (46.4 mm vs 42 mm). The average smartwatch width is 42.0 mm.
    46.4 mm vs 42.0 mm
  • No smart alarm
    Smart alarm
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 52.7% of smartwatches support smart alarms.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
Léo Moreira - Reviews
≈ estimated
31/01/2025
Long-term test · four months of daily use
Verdict
Amazfit GTR 2 2022 remains a good buy at its price after four months, though a newer model is the better choice.

What reviewers agree on

Based on 0 · 5

Reviewers praise the display, comfortable fit and handy music playback, with hardly any complaints raised.
Praised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Third-party reviews

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Amazfit GTR 2 2022

  • Elegant and premium-looking design with a crisp 1.39-inch AMOLED display.
  • Exceptional battery life, often lasting up to 14 days on a single charge.
  • Accurate sleep tracking and general activity monitoring for casual users.
  • Built-in microphone and speaker for handling Bluetooth phone calls.
  • Local music storage (3GB) allowing for phone-free workouts with Bluetooth headphones.
  • Lightweight and comfortable enough for 24/7 wear.

What we don't like about Amazfit GTR 2 2022

  • Lack of third-party app support due to the proprietary operating system.
  • Notifications are non-interactive; users can view but not respond to messages.
  • Inconsistent GPS accuracy and heart rate spikes during high-intensity sports.
  • The Zepp companion app can be difficult to navigate and sometimes has translation issues.
  • Automatic workout detection is often slow to trigger or unreliable.
  • SpO2 (blood oxygen) readings can be finicky and difficult to capture consistently.

Verdict

The Amazfit GTR 2 (2022 New Version) is a sleek smartwatch featuring a 1.39-inch AMOLED display with a 326 ppi pixel density and a 3D curved, borderless design. It is equipped with the BioTracker 2 PPG sensor for 24-hour heart rate and SpO2 monitoring, supports over 90 sports modes with 5 ATM water resistance, and includes 3GB of local music storage alongside built-in Alexa and Bluetooth calling capabilities. Main pros include its vibrant always-on display, lightweight 32g aluminium alloy or stainless steel body, and an impressive battery life of up to 11 days under typical usage from its 471mAh cell. However, notable cons include occasional GPS inaccuracies, inconsistent SpO2 readings, and a lack of support for third-party applications due to its closed Zepp OS environment.

Compare Amazfit GTR 2 2022 with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Amazfit GTR 2 2022 and other Smartwatches

No results found