Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Classic LTE 46mm Review | 126 Data compared

The Samsung Galaxy Watch 4, analyzed by Que Choisir, shifts to Google’s Wear OS, featuring a streamlined aluminum design and a vibrant Super AMOLED screen. Key health features include a BioActive Sensor for heart rate, ECG, and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), though advanced health metrics require a Samsung smartphone. While it offers extensive app access via the Play Store, the device suffers from limited battery life, often lasting only one day, and lacks compatibility with iPhones. For more details, visit Que Choisir.

The Samsung Galaxy Watch 4, analyzed by CNET France, marks a pivotal shift to Google's Wear OS, significantly expanding the app ecosystem via the Google Play Store while maintaining a sleek, lightweight aluminum design. Key pros include the high-performance Exynos W920 5nm chip and a comprehensive Bioactive Sensor for advanced health metrics like body composition, ECG, and heart rate. However, notable cons are identified, including short battery life requiring daily charging and the restriction of certain advanced features to Samsung smartphone users. Positioned as a top choice for Android users, the device successfully merges Samsung’s hardware with Google’s software, though the lack of iOS support and, at the time of review, Google Assistant were highlighted as drawbacks. The review emphasizes the user-friendly interface and robust fitness tracking capabilities, solidifying its place as a premium, albeit ecosystem-locked, wearable.

The Samsung Galaxy Watch4 LTE features a significant transition to Wear OS, offering a broad app library, premium aluminum build, and a bright Super AMOLED display. Powered by the Exynos W920 chip, the device provides smooth performance and includes advanced health tracking via the BioActive Sensor, such as body composition analysis, ECG, and blood pressure monitoring. LTE connectivity allows for a standalone experience, with precise GPS and automatic workout tracking among its pros. A primary drawback identified is the limited battery life, which often fails to last 24 hours with active use, particularly with LTE and the Always-On Display enabled. Long-term usage may reveal performance issues, including overheating during intensive tasks like streaming music, which can trigger device protection modes. Additionally, the most advanced health features are restricted to paired Samsung smartphones, and the watch is not compatible with iPhones.

The Samsung Galaxy Watch4 Classic marks a major shift for Android wearables by adopting Wear OS 3, offering a robust app library through the Google Play Store while maintaining familiar navigation via the One UI Watch skin. Its premium stainless steel design features a tactile, physical rotating bezel and a bright Super AMOLED display, with new health capabilities like body composition analysis and advanced snore tracking. However, the device is limited by mediocre, daily-charge battery life and restricted compatibility, locking advanced features like ECG behind a Samsung smartphone requirement.

The Sport Passion review highlights the Galaxy Watch 5 as a minor upgrade over the Watch 4, retaining the same processor but offering a 1.6x stronger Sapphire Crystal screen, faster 10W charging, and a 15% larger battery. While improving durability and comfort, a significant drawback compared to the Watch 4 Classic is the removal of the physical rotating bezel. The Galaxy Watch 5 Pro stands out as a rugged, titanium-cased option featuring a 590 mAh battery for up to 80 hours of use and specialized navigation tools like GPX route import, though its bulkier 45mm design may not suit smaller wrists. All models run Wear OS with comprehensive health tracking, but users should note that ECG and blood pressure features require a Samsung phone, and the Watch 4 remains a better value proposition for basic users.

The Comme un Camion review highlights the Samsung Galaxy Watch4 Classic as a successful blend of high-end, traditional design and modern, functional technology. Key features include a robust stainless steel construction, a functional mechanical rotating bezel, and a bright Super AMOLED display. The device introduces Wear OS with One UI Watch, enabling Google apps and a larger app ecosystem, paired with advanced health metrics like BioActive sensor-powered Body Composition Analysis (BIA). While praised for its performance, the watch suffers from a limited battery life of 24 to 40 hours, necessitating daily charging. Additionally, the device is incompatible with iOS, and key health tracking features are locked to Samsung smartphones. The review concludes that while it is a leading Android wearable, its restrictive ecosystem and poor battery life are notable drawbacks.

The Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Classic introduces Wear OS 3, combining a premium stainless steel design and a highly functional mechanical bezel with improved app accessibility. While the Super AMOLED display is lauded for clarity, the review notes significant limitations for athletes, specifically inconsistent GPS tracking and inaccurate optical heart rate readings during high-intensity training. Key pros include the quality construction and smart features like body composition analysis, but these are offset by poor 24-40 hour battery life, slow charging, and sub-par sensor precision.

Frandroid's review marks the Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Classic as a major transition to Wear OS 3, offering a premium stainless steel design with a highly functional physical rotating bezel. The device features a vibrant, high-resolution AMOLED display and enhanced app support via the Google Play Store, though it initially lacked Google Assistant. While health tracking, including body composition analysis, is robust, the watch suffers from poor battery life (often under 24 hours) and restricts advanced features like ECG to Samsung smartphones. For the full, detailed review, visit Frandroid.