OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Smartwatches Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 3,488 independent expert reviews and 5,192 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v2.0

Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Classic LTE 46mm Review | 126 Data compared

Avg. price:~£130Screen size:1.40 inchBattery life:1 daysDisplay type:AMOLED

Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Classic LTE 46mm Review: Compare 126 technical specifications and 21 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

8.1

Overall score

Score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartwatch's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartwatches on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 86% of models
Score components

70%

8.1

Technical score

30%

8.1

Review score ( 9 · 12)

Review score 30% · 8.1 · based on 21 independent reviews
Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 30%, technical score 70%. This model has enough reviews, so its review score is the weighted average of their grades. 5 more reviews are not scored yet.
â–²Better than 86% of smartwatches
8.1

Technical score

Technical score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 87% of models
Score components

24%

8.5

Health

21%

9.4

Fitness

16%

4.4

Battery

14%

8.9

Smart features

12%

8.7

Connectivity

9%

8.8

Display & Design

4%

6.8

Hardware

â–²Better than 87% of smartwatches
8.1

Review score

Review score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 72% of models
Grades by review (21)
9 reviews: 9 with a printed score, 0 estimated from the review. 12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 4
✓ explicit
4

7.9%

8.0

expertreviews.co.uk

7.9%

7.0

techradar.com

6.3%

8.0

digitaltrends.com

6.3%

7.4

pickr.com.au

Video reviews 3

3.2%

9.0

Tech It Easy

3.2%

9.0

Chigz Tech Reviews

3.2%

8.0

Tech Spurt

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
â–²Better than 72% of smartwatches
  • samsung-galaxy-watch-4-classic-lte-46-mm
samsung-galaxy-watch-4-classic-lte-46-mm

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Classic LTE 46mm

Technical score
Technical score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 87% of models
Score components:

24%

8.5

Health

21%

9.4

Fitness

16%

4.4

Battery

14%

8.9

Smart features

12%

8.7

Connectivity

9%

8.8

Display & Design

4%

6.8

Hardware

8.1
Review score
Review score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 72% of models
Grades by review (21)
9 reviews: 9 with a printed score, 0 estimated from the review. 12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 4
✓ explicit
4

7.9%

8.0

expertreviews.co.uk

7.9%

7.0

techradar.com

6.3%

8.0

digitaltrends.com

6.3%

7.4

pickr.com.au

Video reviews 3

3.2%

9.0

Tech It Easy

3.2%

9.0

Chigz Tech Reviews

3.2%

8.0

Tech Spurt

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
8.1
Popularity
Popularity
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartwatch.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 62% of models
Popularity:
Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Classic LTE 46mm has a popularity of 7.3 points, which is higher than 61.9% of smartwatches.
7.3
Value for money
Value for money
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 93% of models
Score components:

60%

8.1

Overall score

40%

9.8

Price

8.6
Brand name
Samsung
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
â–² Better than 11% of models
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 10.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
â–² Better than 33% of models
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 33.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
yes
ECG
yes
â–² Better than 84% of models
This smartwatch supports ECG. 83.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
Availability may vary by region or model version. May require a compatible phone, software version, or app setup.
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
â–² Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings. 51.9% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
Accelerometer
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.6% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
yes
Barometer
yes
â–² Better than 51% of models
This smartwatch includes a barometer. 50.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
Gyroscope
yes
â–² Better than 30% of models
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 30.2% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
no
Cadence sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 31.2% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
Distance tracking
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 4.1% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery life
1 day
Battery life
1 days
â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch offers a battery life of 1 days which is shorter than that of 87.3% of smartwatches and equal to that of 8.6% of smartwatches.
Battery life in training mode
10 h
Battery life in training mode
10 h
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
This smartwatch lasts 10 h in training mode which is shorter than 66.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 4.1% of smartwatches.
Battery life with GPS on
15 h
Battery life with GPS on
15 h
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
This smartwatch lasts 15 h with GPS on which is shorter than 61.8% of smartwatches and equal to that of 2.5% of smartwatches.
Battery power
351 mAh
Battery power
351 mAh
â–² Better than 67% of models
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a battery capacity of 351 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 66.7% of smartwatches and equal to those in 0.2% of smartwatches.
Battery capacity varies by case size/model variant.
Charge time
120 min
Charge time
120 min
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges in 120 min which is faster than 13.1% of smartwatches and equal to the charge time of 44.2% of smartwatches.
Normalized from hour-based sources to 120 minutes.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Wear OS
Operating system
Wear OS
â–² Better than 79% of models
This smartwatch runs Wear OS which is more advanced than the operating system in 79% of smartwatches and the same as that in 16.6% of smartwatches.
OS detail: Wear OS (3).
Software update frequency
occasional
Software update frequency
occasional
â–² Better than 58% of models
This smartwatch has occasional software update support which is more active than that of 57.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 36.2% of smartwatches.
Updates are typically released about every 3 months.
Third-party app support
yes
Third-party app support
yes
â–² Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports third-party apps. 52.4% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
Voice assistant support
yes
â–² Better than 32% of models
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 32.4% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
yes
Cellular module
yes
â–² Better than 82% of models
This smartwatch includes a cellular module. 82.2% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
1
SIM cards
1
â–² Better than 2% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This smartwatch uses 1 for cellular connectivity which is more advanced than that of 2% of smartwatches and the same as that of 98% of smartwatches.
eSIM
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
â–² Better than 44% of models
This smartwatch supports GPS. 43.9% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
yes
Galileo support
yes
â–² Better than 62% of models
This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation. 61.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Compass
yes
Compass
yes
â–² Better than 47% of models
This smartwatch includes a compass. 47.5% of smartwatches include a compass.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen size
1.4 inch
Screen size
1.4 inch
â–² Better than 49% of models
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
This smartwatch has a screen size of 1.4 inch which is larger than the screens of 48.8% of smartwatches and equal to those of 6.7% of smartwatches.
Some sources mention multiple/uncertain size variants.
Display type
AMOLED
Display type
AMOLED
â–² Better than 50% of models
This smartwatch uses a AMOLED display type which is more advanced than that of 49.9% of smartwatches and the same as that of 50.1% of smartwatches.
Resolution
450x 450
Resolution
450x 450
â–² Better than 79% of models
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 450x450 which is higher than that of 79% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.7% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
455 ppi
Pixel density
455 ppi
â–² Better than 78% of models
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 455 ppi which is higher than that of 77.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.4% of smartwatches.
Display brightness
1,000 nits
Display brightness
1,000 nits
â–² Better than 59% of models
Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
This smartwatch reaches 1,000 nits of display brightness, which is higher than that of 59.4% of smartwatches and equal to that of 26.5% of smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
2x 1.18 GHz
CPU speed
2x 1.18 GHz
â–² Better than 72% of models
This smartwatch uses a CPU configuration of 2x1.18 GHz which is faster than that in 72% of smartwatches and equal to that in 1.6% of smartwatches.
Processor model
Exynos W920
Processor model
Exynos W920
â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
This smartwatch uses the Exynos W920 processor model.
RAM
1 GB
RAM
1 GB
â–² Better than 31% of models
Market range: <0.5 GB – >2 GB
This smartwatch has 1 GB of RAM which is larger than the RAM in 31.3% of smartwatches and equal to that of 45.8% of smartwatches.
Internal storage
16 GB
Internal storage
16 GB
â–² Better than 80% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch uses 16 GB for internal storage which is larger than that of 79.8% of smartwatches and equal to that of 4.7% of smartwatches.
External memory slot
no
External memory slot
no
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more
What reviewers say

Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Classic LTE 46mm vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • ECG support
    ECG
    yes
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    This smartwatch supports ECG, the average smartwatch does not. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
    Availability may vary by region or model version. May require a compatible phone, software version, or app setup.
  • Blood pressure monitoring
    Blood pressure monitoring
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This smartwatch supports blood pressure monitoring, the average smartwatch does not. 22% of smartwatches support blood pressure monitoring.
  • More advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Wear OS
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Wear OS vs Proprietary OS).
    OS detail: Wear OS (3).
    Wear OS vs Proprietary OS
  • Built-in cellular module
    Cellular module
    yes
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    This smartwatch includes a cellular module, the average smartwatch does not. 17.9% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
  • Fall detection
    Fall detection
    yes
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    This smartwatch supports fall detection, the average smartwatch does not. 21.3% of smartwatches support fall detection.
    manual activation required
  • HRV tracking
    HRV tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 40.8% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • Maps support
    Maps support
    yes
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 31.5% of smartwatches support maps.
    Maps via Google Maps app.
  • VO2 max measurement
    VO2 max measurement
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch measures VO2 max, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • 14.4% better value for money
    Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Classic LTE 46mm has a higher value-for-money score than the average smartwatch (8.6 vs 7.5).
    8.6 vs 7.52
  • ECG support
    ECG
    yes
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    This smartwatch supports ECG, the average smartwatch does not. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
    Availability may vary by region or model version. May require a compatible phone, software version, or app setup.
  • Blood pressure monitoring
    Blood pressure monitoring
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This smartwatch supports blood pressure monitoring, the average smartwatch does not. 22% of smartwatches support blood pressure monitoring.
  • HRV tracking
    HRV tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 40.8% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • VO2 max measurement
    VO2 max measurement
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch measures VO2 max, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • Irregular heart rate alerts
    Irregular heart rate warnings
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does not. 48.1% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • Calorie tracking
    Calorie tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.6% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
  • Weight tracking
    Weight tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This smartwatch supports weight tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 39.1% of smartwatches support weight tracking.
    Weight tracking may rely on manual app entry or smart-scale sync.
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    This smartwatch tracks water intake, the average smartwatch does not. 44% of smartwatches track water intake.
    Water intake tracking may require manual logging in a companion app or widget.
  • External heart rate monitor support
    External heart rate monitor compatibility
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports external heart rate monitor compatibility, the average smartwatch does not. 42.7% of smartwatches support external heart rate monitor compatibility.
    Supported through third-party apps or Wear OS/Tizen workarounds.
  • Barometer sensor included
    Barometer
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This smartwatch includes a barometer, the average smartwatch does not. 49.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • Supports wireless charging
    Wireless charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    This smartwatch supports wireless charging, the average smartwatch does not. 24.5% of smartwatches support wireless charging.
  • 51 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery life
    351 mAh days
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch has a larger battery capacity than the average smartwatch (351 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    Battery capacity varies by case size/model variant.
    351 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • Built-in cellular module
    Cellular module
    yes
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    This smartwatch includes a cellular module, the average smartwatch does not. 17.9% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
  • Maps support
    Maps support
    yes
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 31.5% of smartwatches support maps.
    Maps via Google Maps app.
  • NFC functionality
    NFC
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 43.4% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    Wi-Fi support
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.3% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • Galileo satellite support
    Galileo support
    yes
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation, the average smartwatch does not. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
  • Rugged construction
    Rugged design
    yes
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This smartwatch has a rugged design, the average smartwatch does not. 37.9% of smartwatches have a rugged design.
    Rugged design supported by MIL-STD/military-grade durability claim.
  • 400 nits higher display brightness
    Display brightness
    1,000 nits
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
    This smartwatch has higher display brightness than the average smartwatch (1000 nits vs 600 nits). The average smartwatch reaches 600 nits.
    1,000 nits vs 600 nits
  • Stronger display glass
    Display glass type
    Corning Gorilla Glass
    â–² Better than 46% of models
    This smartwatch uses Corning Gorilla Glass display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass vs mineral glass
  • 129 ppi higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    455 ppi
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
    This smartwatch has a higher pixel density than the average smartwatch (455 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch display reaches 326 ppi.
    455 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • Better case material
    Case material
    stainless steel
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    This smartwatch uses stainless steel for the case material, while the average smartwatch uses polycarbonate.
    stainless steel vs polycarbonate
  • Higher resolution
    Display type
    450 x 450
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 450x450, while the average smartwatch reaches 352x430.
    450x450 vs 352x430
  • More advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Wear OS
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Wear OS vs Proprietary OS).
    OS detail: Wear OS (3).
    Wear OS vs Proprietary OS
  • Fall detection
    Fall detection
    yes
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    This smartwatch supports fall detection, the average smartwatch does not. 21.3% of smartwatches support fall detection.
    manual activation required
  • Emergency SOS
    Emergency SOS
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch includes Emergency SOS, the average smartwatch does not. 42.8% of smartwatches include Emergency SOS.
  • Third-party app support
    Third-party app support
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports third-party apps, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • More frequent updates
    Software update frequency
    occasional
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    This smartwatch receives occasional software updates, while the average smartwatch receives ended updates.
    Updates are typically released about every 3 months.
    occasional vs ended
  • 12 GB more storage
    Internal storage
    16 GB
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
    This smartwatch offers more internal storage than the average smartwatch (16 GB vs 4 GB). The average smartwatch provides 4 GB of storage.
    16 GB vs 4 GB
  • Faster CPU speed
    CPU speed
    2 x 1.18 GHz
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    This smartwatch uses a CPU configuration of 2x1.18 GHz, while the average smartwatch uses 1 GHz.
    2x1.18 GHz vs 1 GHz
  • 6 days day/s shorter battery life
    Battery life
    1 days
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 1 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    1 days vs 7 days
  • 9.25 h shorter training battery life
    Battery life in training mode
    10 h
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
    This smartwatch lasts less in training mode than the average smartwatch (10 h vs 19.25 h). The average smartwatch lasts 19.25 h.
    10 h vs 19.25 h
  • No iOS compatibility
    iOS compatibility
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    This smartwatch offers less complete iOS compatibility than the average smartwatch (no vs yes).
  • 5 h shorter GPS battery life
    Battery life with GPS on
    15 h
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
    This smartwatch lasts less with GPS on than the average smartwatch (15 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h.
    15 h vs 20 h
  • No smart alarm
    Smart alarm
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 52.7% of smartwatches support smart alarms.
  • 7 g heavier weight
    Weight
    52.0 g
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is heavier than the average smartwatch (52 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    Weight refers to watch case without strap/band.
    52.0 g vs 45.0 g
  • 10 °C lower max temperature
    Maximum operating temperature
    35.0 °C
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
    Market range: <35 °C – >60 °C
    This smartwatch handles a lower maximum operating temperature than the average smartwatch (35 °C vs 45 °C). The average smartwatch reaches 45.0 °C.
    35.0 °C vs 45.0 °C
  • 3.5 mm wider watch width
    Width
    45.5 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <34.6 mm – >46.8 mm
    This smartwatch is wider than the average smartwatch (45.5 mm vs 42 mm). The average smartwatch width is 42.0 mm.
    45.5 mm vs 42.0 mm
  • 6 days day/s shorter battery life
    Battery life
    1 days
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 1 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    1 days vs 7 days
  • 9.25 h shorter training battery life
    Battery life in training mode
    10 h
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
    This smartwatch lasts less in training mode than the average smartwatch (10 h vs 19.25 h). The average smartwatch lasts 19.25 h.
    10 h vs 19.25 h
  • 5 h shorter GPS battery life
    Battery life with GPS on
    15 h
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
    This smartwatch lasts less with GPS on than the average smartwatch (15 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h.
    15 h vs 20 h
  • No iOS compatibility
    iOS compatibility
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    This smartwatch offers less complete iOS compatibility than the average smartwatch (no vs yes).
  • 7 g heavier weight
    Weight
    52.0 g
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is heavier than the average smartwatch (52 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    Weight refers to watch case without strap/band.
    52.0 g vs 45.0 g
  • 10 °C lower max temperature
    Maximum operating temperature
    35.0 °C
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
    Market range: <35 °C – >60 °C
    This smartwatch handles a lower maximum operating temperature than the average smartwatch (35 °C vs 45 °C). The average smartwatch reaches 45.0 °C.
    35.0 °C vs 45.0 °C
  • 3.5 mm wider watch width
    Width
    45.5 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <34.6 mm – >46.8 mm
    This smartwatch is wider than the average smartwatch (45.5 mm vs 42 mm). The average smartwatch width is 42.0 mm.
    45.5 mm vs 42.0 mm
  • Basic band material
    Band material
    silicone, rubber
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    This smartwatch uses silicone, rubber for the band material, while the average smartwatch uses silicone.
    silicone, rubber vs silicone
  • No smart alarm
    Smart alarm
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 52.7% of smartwatches support smart alarms.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Tech It Easy
≈ estimated
06/03/2022
Long-term test · about six months of daily use
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Classic LTE 46mm is a capable Wear OS watch with useful health sensors, though its design is not especially classic.
8.0
Tech Spurt
≈ estimated
04/10/2021
Hands-on review · features, fitness and battery
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Classic LTE 46mm is a good smartwatch with caveats: battery life is weak, though it is a distinctive, enjoyable smartwatch.
9.0
Tech It Easy
≈ estimated
03/10/2021
Long-term test · one month of daily use
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Classic LTE 46mm is a safe buy, especially within the Samsung ecosystem.
9.0
Chigz Tech Reviews
≈ estimated
27/08/2021
In-depth review · health sensors, apps and battery tests
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Classic LTE 46mm is the best smartwatch you can buy right now for Samsung phone owners, despite its battery life and iOS limits.
7.0
Tech It Easy
≈ estimated
30/08/2021
Unboxing · first impressions and battery notes
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Classic LTE 46mm may reach two days of battery, but the missing Galaxy Store is the main drawback so far.
Not graded
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

What reviewers agree on

Based on 9 · 14

Reviewers love the apps, smooth software and rotating bezel, but battery life and limited phone compatibility are common gripes.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.0
digitaltrends.com
✓ explicit
21/04/2022
Week-long review · Health-tracking smartwatch
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Classic suits fitness fans who want comfortable, detailed health tracking, but its battery lasts about two days on a charge.
forbes.com
05/09/2021
Not graded yet
au.pcmag.com
18/08/2021
Not graded yet
7.4
pickr.com.au
✓ explicit
21/09/2021
Long-term test · Battery and health
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Classic has an attractive design and solid health tracking, but its battery needs charging every day, so it is hard to recommend.
7.0
techradar.com
✓ explicit
13/09/2022
Full review · Rotating bezel watch
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Classic has one of the best displays and easy rotating-bezel navigation, but its battery regularly fails to last a full day.
8.0
expertreviews.co.uk
✓ explicit
12/10/2023
Full review · Samsung phone owners
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Classic is a fast, app-rich Wear OS watch best suited to Samsung phone owners, though its battery life is only mediocre.
7.8
computerbild.de
✓ explicit
27/07/2023
Hands-on test · Android smartwatch
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Classic is an elegant Android watch with accurate heart-rate tracking, but it does not work with iPhones.
9.0
pcwelt.de
✓ explicit
04/04/2023
Hands-on test · Wear OS smartwatch
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Classic is a classic-looking watch with a tactile physical bezel, but some of its best features need a Samsung phone.
9.0
chip.de
✓ explicit
19/11/2021
Lab test · Wear OS smartwatch
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Classic suits buyers who want a rotating bezel and Google apps, but its battery falls short and some features need a Samsung phone.
7.8
netzwelt.de
✓ explicit
24/05/2022
Full test · Wear OS watch
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Classic has a clever control concept and clean build, but full use needs two accounts and a Samsung phone for some features.
9.2
profesionalreview.com
✓ explicit
26/09/2021
Full review · Stainless steel watch
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Classic is a stainless steel watch with a physical bezel and plenty of health sensors, but it is bulky and not ideal to wear at night.

Third-party reviews

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Classic LTE 46mm

  • Tactile physical rotating bezel that provides intuitive and easy navigation.
  • Bright and sharp Super AMOLED display with high resolution and vibrant colours.
  • Premium stainless steel build quality that is durable and attractive.
  • Comprehensive health tracking, including innovative body composition analysis (BMI, body fat).
  • Improved third-party app support through the switch to Wear OS, including Google Maps and Spotify.
  • Fast and smooth performance powered by the Exynos W920 processor.
  • Reliable water resistance (5ATM) suitable for swimming.

What we don't like about Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Classic LTE 46mm

  • Short battery life that typically requires daily charging, often lasting less than 24-40 hours.
  • Limited functionality when paired with non-Samsung Android phones (e.g., restricted ECG and blood pressure features).
  • Complete lack of compatibility with iPhones.
  • The 46mm size can feel bulky and heavy on smaller wrists.
  • Charging speed is relatively slow, taking nearly two hours for a full charge.
  • Fitness tracking can occasionally be hit-or-miss with rep counting or fiddly workout controls.

Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Classic LTE 46mm is a premium smartwatch featuring a 1.4-inch Super AMOLED display (450 x 450 resolution) protected by Gorilla Glass DX and a durable 45.5mm stainless steel case. It is powered by the Exynos W920 5nm dual-core processor with 1.5GB of RAM, 16GB of internal storage, and runs Wear OS with One UI Watch. Key characteristics include its iconic physical rotating bezel for navigation, 5ATM/IP68 water resistance, MIL-STD-810G military-grade durability, and an advanced BioActive Sensor capable of measuring ECG, blood pressure, and body composition (BIA). Main pros include its smooth performance, highly tactile navigation, vibrant screen, and extensive health-tracking suite. However, notable cons include its limited battery life, which often requires daily charging, and certain advanced health features being restricted to users with Samsung Galaxy smartphones.

Compare Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Classic LTE 46mm with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Classic LTE 46mm and other Smartwatches

No results found