OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Smartwatches Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 3,488 independent expert reviews and 5,192 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v2.0

Oneplus Watch 2R Review | 126 Data compared

Avg. price:~£120Screen size:1.43 inchBattery life:4 daysDisplay type:AMOLED

Oneplus Watch 2R Review: Compare 126 technical specifications and 22 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

8.1

Overall score

Score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartwatch's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartwatches on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 87% of models
Score components

70%

7.9

Technical score

30%

8.5

Review score ( 10 · 12)

Review score 30% · 8.5 · based on 22 independent reviews
Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 30%, technical score 70%. This model has enough reviews, so its review score is the weighted average of their grades. 13 more reviews are not scored yet.
â–²Better than 87% of smartwatches
7.9

Technical score

Technical score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 84% of models
Score components

24%

6.4

Health

21%

9.4

Fitness

16%

7.5

Battery

14%

8.1

Smart features

12%

7.8

Connectivity

9%

8.4

Display & Design

4%

9.1

Hardware

â–²Better than 84% of smartwatches
8.5

Review score

Review score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 92% of models
Grades by review (22)
10 reviews: 4 with a printed score, 6 estimated from the review. 12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 4
✓ explicit
2

8%

8.0

pcmag.com

6.4%

7.0

howtogeek.com

≈ estimated
2

6.4%

8.0

coolsmartphone.com

6.4%

7.0

wareable.com

Video reviews 4

3.2%

9.0

Mark Ellis Reviews

3.2%

9.0

Mike O'Brien

3.2%

8.0

DeviceBAR

1.6%

9.0

Get There Faster

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
★Better than 92% of smartwatches
  • No image
No image

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Oneplus Watch 2R

Technical score
Technical score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 84% of models
Score components:

24%

6.4

Health

21%

9.4

Fitness

16%

7.5

Battery

14%

8.1

Smart features

12%

7.8

Connectivity

9%

8.4

Display & Design

4%

9.1

Hardware

7.9
Review score
Review score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 92% of models
Grades by review (22)
10 reviews: 4 with a printed score, 6 estimated from the review. 12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 4
✓ explicit
2

8%

8.0

pcmag.com

6.4%

7.0

howtogeek.com

≈ estimated
2

6.4%

8.0

coolsmartphone.com

6.4%

7.0

wareable.com

Video reviews 4

3.2%

9.0

Mark Ellis Reviews

3.2%

9.0

Mike O'Brien

3.2%

8.0

DeviceBAR

1.6%

9.0

Get There Faster

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
8.5
Popularity
Popularity
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartwatch.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 65% of models
Popularity:
Oneplus Watch 2R has a popularity of 7.6 points, which is higher than 65.4% of smartwatches.
7.6
Value for money
Value for money
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 93% of models
Score components:

60%

8.1

Overall score

40%

9.9

Price

8.6
Brand name
Oneplus
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
â–² Better than 11% of models
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 10.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
â–² Better than 33% of models
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 33.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
ECG
no
â–¼ Worse than 17% of models
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
â–² Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings. 51.9% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
Accelerometer
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.6% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
yes
Barometer
yes
â–² Better than 51% of models
This smartwatch includes a barometer. 50.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
Gyroscope
yes
â–² Better than 30% of models
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 30.2% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
yes
Cadence sensor
yes
â–² Better than 69% of models
This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor. 69% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Cadence may require external sensor/app pairing on some models.
Distance tracking
yes
Distance tracking
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 4.1% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
Battery life
4 days
Battery life
4 days
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch offers a battery life of 4 days which is shorter than that of 70.5% of smartwatches and equal to that of 2.9% of smartwatches.
Up to 5 days with AOD.
Battery life in training mode
48 h
Battery life in training mode
48 h
â–² Better than 89% of models
Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
This smartwatch lasts 48 h in training mode which is longer than 89.1% of smartwatches and equal to that of 2.7% of smartwatches.
Battery life with GPS on
60 h
Battery life with GPS on
60 h
★ Better than 97% of models
Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
This smartwatch lasts 60 h with GPS on which is longer than 96.9% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.6% of smartwatches.
2r's general use battery life with always-on.
Battery power
500 mAh
Battery power
500 mAh
★ Better than 93% of models
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a battery capacity of 500 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 93.1% of smartwatches and equal to those in 1% of smartwatches.
Charge time
60 min
Charge time
60 min
â–² Better than 83% of models
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges in 60 min which is faster than 82.6% of smartwatches and equal to the charge time of 12.1% of smartwatches.
Approximate value from reported charging range: 60 minutes.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Wear OS
Operating system
Wear OS
â–² Better than 79% of models
This smartwatch runs Wear OS which is more advanced than the operating system in 79% of smartwatches and the same as that in 16.6% of smartwatches.
OS detail: Wear OS (4).
Software update frequency
occasional
Software update frequency
occasional
â–² Better than 58% of models
This smartwatch has occasional software update support which is more active than that of 57.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 36.2% of smartwatches.
Updates are typically released about every 3 months.
Third-party app support
yes
Third-party app support
yes
â–² Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports third-party apps. 52.4% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
Voice assistant support
yes
â–² Better than 32% of models
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 32.4% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
Cellular module
no
â–¼ Worse than 18% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 18% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
â–² Better than 44% of models
This smartwatch supports GPS. 43.9% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
yes
Galileo support
yes
â–² Better than 62% of models
This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation. 61.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Compass
yes
Compass
yes
â–² Better than 47% of models
This smartwatch includes a compass. 47.5% of smartwatches include a compass.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen size
1.43 inch
Screen size
1.43 inch
â–² Better than 56% of models
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
This smartwatch has a screen size of 1.43 inch which is larger than the screens of 56.3% of smartwatches and equal to those of 8.2% of smartwatches.
Display type
AMOLED
Display type
AMOLED
â–² Better than 50% of models
This smartwatch uses a AMOLED display type which is more advanced than that of 49.9% of smartwatches and the same as that of 50.1% of smartwatches.
Resolution
466x 466
Resolution
466x 466
â–² Better than 87% of models
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 466x466 which is higher than that of 87.4% of smartwatches and equal to that of 10.9% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
461 ppi
Pixel density
461 ppi
â–² Better than 84% of models
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 461 ppi which is higher than that of 84.5% of smartwatches and equal to that of 6.5% of smartwatches.
Display brightness
1,000 nits
Display brightness
1,000 nits
â–² Better than 59% of models
Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
This smartwatch reaches 1,000 nits of display brightness, which is higher than that of 59.4% of smartwatches and equal to that of 26.5% of smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
4x 1.7 GHz
CPU speed
4x 1.7 GHz
★ Better than 91% of models
This smartwatch uses a CPU configuration of 4x1.7 GHz which is faster than that in 90.8% of smartwatches and equal to that in 8% of smartwatches.
Processor model
Snapdragon W5 Gen 1
Processor model
Snapdragon W5 Gen 1
â–² Better than 80% of models
This smartwatch uses the Snapdragon W5 Gen 1 processor model.
With BES2700BP co-processor.
RAM
2 GB
RAM
2 GB
â–² Better than 78% of models
Market range: <0.5 GB – >2 GB
This smartwatch has 2 GB of RAM which is larger than the RAM in 77.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 21.4% of smartwatches.
Internal storage
32 GB
Internal storage
32 GB
â–² Better than 85% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch uses 32 GB for internal storage which is larger than that of 84.7% of smartwatches and equal to that of 13.4% of smartwatches.
External memory slot
no
External memory slot
no
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Oneplus Watch 2R vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • 40 h longer GPS battery life
    Battery life with GPS on
    60 h
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
    This smartwatch lasts longer with GPS on than the average smartwatch (60 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h.
    2r's general use battery life with always-on.
    60 h vs 20 h
  • 60 min shorter charge time
    Charge time
    60 min
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    Market range: <60 min – >150 min
    This smartwatch charges faster than the average smartwatch (60 min vs 120 min). The average smartwatch charges in 120 min.
    Approximate value from reported charging range: 60 minutes.
    60 min vs 120 min
  • More advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Wear OS
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Wear OS vs Proprietary OS).
    OS detail: Wear OS (4).
    Wear OS vs Proprietary OS
  • 28.75 h longer training battery life
    Battery life in training mode
    48 h
    â–² Better than 89% of models
    Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
    This smartwatch lasts longer in training mode than the average smartwatch (48 h vs 19.25 h). The average smartwatch lasts 19.25 h.
    48 h vs 19.25 h
  • HRV tracking
    HRV tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 40.8% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • Maps support
    Maps support
    yes
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 31.5% of smartwatches support maps.
    Maps via Google Maps app.
  • VO2 max measurement
    VO2 max measurement
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch measures VO2 max, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • Emergency SOS
    Emergency SOS
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch includes Emergency SOS, the average smartwatch does not. 42.8% of smartwatches include Emergency SOS.
  • 14.7% better value for money
    Oneplus Watch 2R has a higher value-for-money score than the average smartwatch (8.62 vs 7.5).
    8.62 vs 7.52
  • HRV tracking
    HRV tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 40.8% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • VO2 max measurement
    VO2 max measurement
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch measures VO2 max, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • Irregular heart rate alerts
    Irregular heart rate warnings
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does not. 48.1% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • Weight tracking
    Weight tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This smartwatch supports weight tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 39.1% of smartwatches support weight tracking.
    Tracked through the companion app or smart-scale sync.
  • Barometer sensor included
    Barometer
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This smartwatch includes a barometer, the average smartwatch does not. 49.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • Cadence tracking
    Cadence sensor
    yes
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 31.1% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
    Cadence may require external sensor/app pairing on some models.
  • Route support
    Route support
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch supports route support, the average smartwatch does not. 50% of smartwatches support route support.
    Route support available via companion app.
  • 20 more exercise profiles
    Multi-sport mode
    100
    â–² Better than 32% of models
    This smartwatch supports more exercise modes than the average smartwatch (100 vs 80). The average smartwatch supports 80 exercise modes.
    Reported as at least 100 exercise modes.
    100 vs 80
  • 40 h longer GPS battery life
    Battery life with GPS on
    60 h
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
    This smartwatch lasts longer with GPS on than the average smartwatch (60 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h.
    2r's general use battery life with always-on.
    60 h vs 20 h
  • 60 min shorter charge time
    Charge time
    60 min
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    Market range: <60 min – >150 min
    This smartwatch charges faster than the average smartwatch (60 min vs 120 min). The average smartwatch charges in 120 min.
    Approximate value from reported charging range: 60 minutes.
    60 min vs 120 min
  • 28.75 h longer training battery life
    Battery life in training mode
    48 h
    â–² Better than 89% of models
    Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
    This smartwatch lasts longer in training mode than the average smartwatch (48 h vs 19.25 h). The average smartwatch lasts 19.25 h.
    48 h vs 19.25 h
  • 200 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery life
    500 mAh days
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch has a larger battery capacity than the average smartwatch (500 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    Up to 5 days with AOD.
    500 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • Maps support
    Maps support
    yes
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 31.5% of smartwatches support maps.
    Maps via Google Maps app.
  • NFC functionality
    NFC
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 43.4% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    Wi-Fi support
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.3% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • Galileo satellite support
    Galileo support
    yes
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation, the average smartwatch does not. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
  • 400 nits higher display brightness
    Display brightness
    1,000 nits
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
    This smartwatch has higher display brightness than the average smartwatch (1000 nits vs 600 nits). The average smartwatch reaches 600 nits.
    1,000 nits vs 600 nits
  • 135 ppi higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    461 ppi
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
    This smartwatch has a higher pixel density than the average smartwatch (461 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch display reaches 326 ppi.
    461 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • Higher resolution
    Display type
    466 x 466
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 466x466, while the average smartwatch reaches 352x430.
    466x466 vs 352x430
  • 8 g lighter weight
    Weight
    37.0 g
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is lighter than the average smartwatch (37 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    37.0 g vs 45.0 g
  • 10 °C higher max temperature
    Maximum operating temperature
    55.0 °C
    â–² Better than 81% of models
    Market range: <35 °C – >60 °C
    This smartwatch handles a higher maximum operating temperature than the average smartwatch (55 °C vs 45 °C). The average smartwatch reaches 45.0 °C.
    55.0 °C vs 45.0 °C
  • More advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Wear OS
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Wear OS vs Proprietary OS).
    OS detail: Wear OS (4).
    Wear OS vs Proprietary OS
  • Emergency SOS
    Emergency SOS
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch includes Emergency SOS, the average smartwatch does not. 42.8% of smartwatches include Emergency SOS.
  • Third-party app support
    Third-party app support
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports third-party apps, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • More frequent updates
    Software update frequency
    occasional
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    This smartwatch receives occasional software updates, while the average smartwatch receives ended updates.
    Updates are typically released about every 3 months.
    occasional vs ended
  • 28 GB more storage
    Internal storage
    32 GB
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
    This smartwatch offers more internal storage than the average smartwatch (32 GB vs 4 GB). The average smartwatch provides 4 GB of storage.
    32 GB vs 4 GB
  • 1 GB more RAM
    RAM
    2 GB
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <0.5 GB – >2 GB
    This smartwatch has more RAM than the average smartwatch (2 GB vs 1 GB). The average smartwatch includes 1 GB of RAM.
    2 GB vs 1 GB
  • Faster CPU speed
    CPU speed
    4 x 1.7 GHz
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    This smartwatch uses a CPU configuration of 4x1.7 GHz, while the average smartwatch uses 1 GHz.
    4x1.7 GHz vs 1 GHz
  • 3 year/s newer release date
    Release date
    2024
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This smartwatch has a newer release date than the average smartwatch (2024 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    July 2024
    2024 vs 2021
  • More advanced processor model
    Processor model
    Snapdragon W5 Gen 1
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    This smartwatch uses the Snapdragon W5 Gen 1 processor model, while the average smartwatch uses Silicon Labs EFM32 Giant Gecko.
    With BES2700BP co-processor.
    Snapdragon W5 Gen 1 vs Silicon Labs EFM32 Giant Gecko
  • No cycle tracking
    Menstrual cycle tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartwatch does not support menstrual cycle tracking, the average smartwatch does. 64.3% of smartwatches support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • No iOS compatibility
    iOS compatibility
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    This smartwatch offers less complete iOS compatibility than the average smartwatch (no vs yes).
  • 3 days day/s shorter battery life
    Battery life
    4 days
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 4 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    Up to 5 days with AOD.
    4 days vs 7 days
  • Basic battery type
    Battery type
    Li-ion
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartwatch uses a Li-ion battery, while the average smartwatch uses Li-Po.
    Li-ion vs Li-Po
  • No smart alarm
    Smart alarm
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 52.7% of smartwatches support smart alarms.
  • 4.6 mm wider watch width
    Width
    46.6 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    Market range: <34.6 mm – >46.8 mm
    This smartwatch is wider than the average smartwatch (46.6 mm vs 42 mm). The average smartwatch width is 42.0 mm.
    46.6 mm vs 42.0 mm
  • 0.5 mm thicker watch body
    Thickness
    12.10 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    Market range: <9.8 mm – >14.1 mm
    This smartwatch is thicker than the average smartwatch (12.1 mm vs 11.6 mm). The average smartwatch thickness is 11.6 mm.
    12.10 mm vs 11.6 mm
  • 2.6 mm taller watch height
    Height
    47.6 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <39.5 mm – >51 mm
    This smartwatch is taller than the average smartwatch (47.6 mm vs 45 mm). The average smartwatch height is 45 mm.
    47.6 mm vs 45 mm
  • No cycle tracking
    Menstrual cycle tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartwatch does not support menstrual cycle tracking, the average smartwatch does. 64.3% of smartwatches support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • 3 days day/s shorter battery life
    Battery life
    4 days
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 4 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    Up to 5 days with AOD.
    4 days vs 7 days
  • Basic battery type
    Battery type
    Li-ion
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartwatch uses a Li-ion battery, while the average smartwatch uses Li-Po.
    Li-ion vs Li-Po
  • No iOS compatibility
    iOS compatibility
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    This smartwatch offers less complete iOS compatibility than the average smartwatch (no vs yes).
  • 4.6 mm wider watch width
    Width
    46.6 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    Market range: <34.6 mm – >46.8 mm
    This smartwatch is wider than the average smartwatch (46.6 mm vs 42 mm). The average smartwatch width is 42.0 mm.
    46.6 mm vs 42.0 mm
  • 0.5 mm thicker watch body
    Thickness
    12.10 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    Market range: <9.8 mm – >14.1 mm
    This smartwatch is thicker than the average smartwatch (12.1 mm vs 11.6 mm). The average smartwatch thickness is 11.6 mm.
    12.10 mm vs 11.6 mm
  • 2.6 mm taller watch height
    Height
    47.6 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <39.5 mm – >51 mm
    This smartwatch is taller than the average smartwatch (47.6 mm vs 45 mm). The average smartwatch height is 45 mm.
    47.6 mm vs 45 mm
  • No smart alarm
    Smart alarm
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 52.7% of smartwatches support smart alarms.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Mark Ellis Reviews
≈ estimated
17/08/2024
Hands-on review · 2-day battery test and app walkthrough
Verdict
OnePlus Watch 2R looks nothing like an Apple Watch and is a bargain at its price.
8.0
DeviceBAR
≈ estimated
01/08/2024
Hands-on review · a week of daily use
Verdict
OnePlus Watch 2R is a good pick for budget Wear OS buyers who want decent battery life, though it has no eSIM.
9.0
Mike O'Brien
≈ estimated
16/07/2024
Hands-on review · features, health tracking and comparison
Verdict
OnePlus Watch 2R is a strong pick for Android users who care more about smart features than health tracking.
9.0
Get There Faster
≈ estimated
03/09/2024
Short review · comparison with the Watch 2
Verdict
OnePlus Watch 2R is nearly identical to the Watch 2 at a lower price, a strong full-featured choice for Android users.
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

What reviewers agree on

Based on 10 · 13

Reviewers praise the long battery life and accurate GPS, but find the screen disappointing and are split on its size.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

androidcentral.com
28/07/2024
Not graded yet
cnet.com
01/08/2024
Not graded yet
cgmagonline.com
10/09/2024
Not graded yet
techadvisor.com
20/09/2024
Not graded yet
8.0
coolsmartphone.com
≈ estimated
10/10/2024
Long-term test · Android-only smartwatch
Verdict
The OnePlus Watch 2R is a light, durable Android watch for people who don't need its OHealth app to sync with other fitness services.
8.0
pcmag.com
✓ explicit
12/10/2024
Hands-on test · Battery and accuracy
Verdict
The OnePlus Watch 2R is a long-lasting Wear OS watch for runners, but it lacks ECG, fall detection and training-load guidance.
7.0
wareable.com
≈ estimated
26/02/2026
Hands-on review · Multi-day battery
Verdict
The OnePlus Watch 2R is a comfortable multi-day Wear OS watch for workouts, but it is too big for small wrists and its glass is less scratch-resistant than sapphire.
phonearena.com
16/07/2024
Not graded yet
xda-developers.com
16/07/2024
Not graded yet
uk.pcmag.com
12/10/2024
Not graded yet
9.0
pcwelt.de
✓ explicit
21/11/2024
Hands-on test · Multi-day battery
Verdict
The OnePlus Watch 2R suits Android users who want days of battery life and dependable fitness tracking, but its single case size may not fit small wrists.
nextpit.de
16/08/2024
Not graded yet
01net.com
24/09/2024
Not graded yet
9.5
frandroid.com
≈ estimated
03/12/2024
Editors' pick · Battery and GPS
Verdict
The OnePlus Watch 2R is a bright, long-lasting Wear OS watch whose dual-processor design and precise GPS suit buyers who want days between charges.
frandroid.com
09/11/2024
Not graded yet
9.0
cnetfrance.fr
≈ estimated
20/10/2024
Hands-on test · Running and health
Verdict
The OnePlus Watch 2R is a precise multi-sport watch for fitness and health tracking, though its bulky case suits larger wrists best.
10
gadgetgear.nl
✓ explicit
20/10/2024
Hands-on review · Lightweight Wear OS
Verdict
The OnePlus Watch 2R is a light, durable Wear OS watch whose battery can last over ten days in RTOS mode, but it has no rotating crown.
smartphoneman.nl
01/07/2024
Not graded yet
androidplanet.nl
17/07/2024
Not graded yet

Third-party reviews

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Oneplus Watch 2R

  • Exceptional battery life (up to 100 hours in Smart Mode and 12 days in Power Saver)
  • Fast charging capabilities (full charge in approximately 60 minutes)
  • Lightweight aluminum build (roughly 25% lighter than the standard OnePlus Watch 2)
  • Affordable price point for a full Wear OS experience
  • Bright and vibrant 1.43-inch AMOLED display (up to 1,000 nits peak brightness)
  • Smooth performance powered by the Snapdragon W5 dual-engine architecture
  • Accurate dual-frequency GPS and comprehensive sports tracking (100+ modes)

What we don't like about Oneplus Watch 2R

  • Large 46mm case size is often too bulky for users with smaller wrists
  • Lacks advanced health sensors such as ECG, skin temperature, and fall detection
  • The OHealth companion app is considered basic and less polished than competitors
  • Missing a rotating crown; the side buttons are push-only
  • No LTE/cellular connectivity option available
  • Lacks wireless charging support (requires a proprietary pogo pin puck)
  • Limited software support period (only 2 major Wear OS updates guaranteed)

Verdict

The OnePlus Watch 2R is a lightweight Wear OS 4 smartwatch featuring a 1.43-inch AMOLED display with 1,000 nits peak brightness and a dual-engine architecture powered by the Snapdragon W5 and BES2700 chipsets. Key characteristics include an aluminum alloy chassis that is 25% lighter than the standard Watch 2, dual-frequency GPS (L1+L5) for precise tracking, and 32GB of internal storage. Its primary pros are an exceptional battery life of up to 100 hours in smart mode (extending to 12 days in power saver mode) and rapid 7.5W VOOC charging that reaches 100% in 60 minutes. However, notable cons include the lack of a functional rotating crown, no LTE or wireless charging support, and the absence of advanced health metrics like ECG, fall detection, or menstrual cycle tracking.

Compare Oneplus Watch 2R with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Oneplus Watch 2R and other Smartwatches

No results found