OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartwatches Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v3.0

Ulefone Watch GPS review: 127 specs compared

Avg. price:~£70Screen size:1.30 inchBattery life:7.5 daysDisplay type:TFT LCD

Ulefone Watch GPS Review: Compare 127 technical specifications and 2 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

Ulefone Watch GPS
5.9/10

Overall score

Score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
Score components

35%

5.0

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

5.0

Reviews score

10%

?

Sentiment scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 6.8, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 88% of smartwatches
7.2

Value for money

Value for money
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
Score components

70%

5.9

Overall score

30%

10

Price

â–¼Worse than 85%
5.0

Technical score

Technical score
5.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
Score components

24%

3.5

Health

21%

7.5

Fitness

16%

5.8

Battery

14%

3.6

Smart features

12%

5.2

Connectivity

9%

5.5

Display & Design

4%

1.0

Hardware

â–¼Worse than 85%
5.0

Reviews score

Reviews score
5.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models

5.0

Mark 7.5 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

8.0

Average grade

20%

5.7

Popularity

Grades by review (2)
1 review + 1 video, average 8.0/10. We use 5 reviews; the 3 missing count as the category's typical 8.0: (8.0 × 2 + 8.0 × 3) ÷ 5 = 8.0. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 90%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • ulefone-watch-gps
  • ulefone-watch-gps
  • ulefone-watch-gps
  • ulefone-watch-gps
  • ulefone-watch-gps
  • ulefone-watch-gps
  • ulefone-watch-gps
  • ulefone-watch-gps
  • ulefone-watch-gps
ulefone-watch-gps
ulefone-watch-gps
ulefone-watch-gps
ulefone-watch-gps
ulefone-watch-gps
ulefone-watch-gps
ulefone-watch-gps
ulefone-watch-gps
ulefone-watch-gps
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Ulefone Watch GPS

Technical score
Technical score
5.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
Score components:

24%

3.5

Health

21%

7.5

Fitness

16%

5.8

Battery

14%

3.6

Smart features

12%

5.2

Connectivity

9%

5.5

Display & Design

4%

1.0

Hardware

5.0
Reviews score
5.0
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
Score components:

70%

5.9

Overall score

30%

10

Price

7.2
Heart rate monitor
yes
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 9.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
no
This smartwatch does not support blood oxygen monitoring. 69.7% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 18.2% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings. 50.6% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
HRV tracking
no
This smartwatch does not support HRV tracking. 45.2% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
Show more
Accelerometer
yes
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.5% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
no
This smartwatch does not include a barometer. 53.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 28.9% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
no
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 32.9% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 3.7% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
Battery life
7.5 days
Market range: <1 day – >20 days
This smartwatch lasts 7.5 days on a charge, which is longer than 52.1% of Smartwatches and the same as 0.5% of Smartwatches.
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life with GPS on
20 h
Market range: <6 h – >46 h
This smartwatch lasts 20 h with GPS on, which is shorter than 52.5% of Smartwatches and the same as 6% of Smartwatches.
Up to 7 days of active use and 40 days in standby.
Battery power
210 mAh
Market range: <200 mAh – >500 mAh
This smartwatch has a 210 mAh battery, which is smaller than 84.4% of Smartwatches and the same as 2.5% of Smartwatches.
Charge time
150 min
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges from empty in 150 min, which is slower than 88.4% of Smartwatches and the same as 7.4% of Smartwatches.
Show more
Operating system
Proprietary OS
This smartwatch runs Proprietary OS, which is less advanced than the system in 54.2% of Smartwatches and equal to 42% of Smartwatches.
Software update frequency
?
Third-party app support
no
This smartwatch does not support third-party apps. 51.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
no
This smartwatch does not support voice assistants. 69.3% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
Cellular module
no
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 16.7% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
1
Market range: <0 – >5
This smartwatch uses 1 for cellular connectivity which is more advanced than that of 2% of smartwatches and the same as that of 98% of smartwatches.
eSIM
GPS
yes
This smartwatch supports GPS. 40.3% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
yes
This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation. 56.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Dual-frequency GPS
no
This smartwatch does not support dual-frequency GPS. 15.1% of Smartwatches offer this.
Show more
Screen size
1.3 inch
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.83 inch
This smartwatch has a 1.3 inch screen, which is smaller than 67.1% of Smartwatches and the same as 10.8% of Smartwatches.
Display type
TFT LCD
This smartwatch uses TFT LCD, which is less advanced than the screen in 76.5% of Smartwatches and equal to 14.5% of Smartwatches.
Resolution
240x 240
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 240x240 which is lower than that of 75.3% of smartwatches and equal to that of 14.1% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
261 ppi
Market range: <213 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 261 ppi, which is lower than 75.7% of Smartwatches and equal to 4.1% of Smartwatches.
Display brightness
?
Show more
CPU speed
?
Processor model
Apollo3.5 Blue Plus
This smartwatch uses the Apollo3.5 Blue Plus processor model.
RAM
?
Internal storage
0 GB
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch has 0 GB of internal storage, which is less than 76.5% of Smartwatches and equal to 23.5% of Smartwatches.
No local user storage for apps/media
External memory slot
no
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Ulefone Watch GPS vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • Supports wireless charging
    This smartwatch supports wireless charging, the average smartwatch does not. 23.4% of smartwatches support wireless charging.
  • Galileo satellite support
    This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation, the average smartwatch does not. 43.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
  • Rugged construction
    This smartwatch has a rugged design, the average smartwatch does not. 41.2% of smartwatches have a rugged design.
  • Weight tracking
    This smartwatch supports weight tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 41.9% of smartwatches support weight tracking.
  • Water intake tracking
    This smartwatch tracks water intake, the average smartwatch does not. 44.1% of smartwatches track water intake.
  • 10 g lighter
    This smartwatch is lighter than the average smartwatch (35 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45 g.
    35 g vs 45 g
  • 0.5 days longer battery life
    This smartwatch runs longer per charge than the average smartwatch (7.5 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    7.5 days vs 7 days
  • 5.5 mm narrower case
    This smartwatch has a narrower case than the average smartwatch (37 mm vs 42.5 mm). The average smartwatch measures 42.5 mm across.
    37 mm vs 42.5 mm
  • Weight tracking
    This smartwatch supports weight tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 41.9% of smartwatches support weight tracking.
  • Water intake tracking
    This smartwatch tracks water intake, the average smartwatch does not. 44.1% of smartwatches track water intake.
  • Supports wireless charging
    This smartwatch supports wireless charging, the average smartwatch does not. 23.4% of smartwatches support wireless charging.
  • 0.5 days longer battery life
    This smartwatch runs longer per charge than the average smartwatch (7.5 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    7.5 days vs 7 days
  • Galileo satellite support
    This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation, the average smartwatch does not. 43.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
  • Rugged construction
    This smartwatch has a rugged design, the average smartwatch does not. 41.2% of smartwatches have a rugged design.
  • 10 g lighter
    This smartwatch is lighter than the average smartwatch (35 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45 g.
    35 g vs 45 g
  • 5.5 mm narrower case
    This smartwatch has a narrower case than the average smartwatch (37 mm vs 42.5 mm). The average smartwatch measures 42.5 mm across.
    37 mm vs 42.5 mm
  • No VO2 max measurement
    This smartwatch does not measure VO2 max, the average smartwatch does. 51.3% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • No blood oxygen monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support blood oxygen monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 69.6% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
  • No third-party apps
    This smartwatch does not support third-party apps, the average smartwatch does. 51.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • No irregular heart rate alerts
    This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does. 50.6% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • 28.6% lower review score
    Reviews score
    5.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models

    5.0

    Mark 7.5 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    8.0

    Average grade

    20%

    5.7

    Popularity

    Grades by review (2)
    1 review + 1 video, average 8.0/10. We use 5 reviews; the 3 missing count as the category's typical 8.0: (8.0 × 2 + 8.0 × 3) ÷ 5 = 8.0. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    5.0 vs 7.0
  • No stress monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support stress monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 68.7% of smartwatches support stress monitoring.
  • More basic display
    This smartwatch uses a more basic screen than the average smartwatch (TFT LCD vs AMOLED).
    TFT LCD vs AMOLED
  • No elevation tracking
    This smartwatch does not support elevation tracking, the average smartwatch does. 67.6% of smartwatches support elevation tracking.
  • 28.6% lower review score
    Reviews score
    5.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models

    5.0

    Mark 7.5 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    8.0

    Average grade

    20%

    5.7

    Popularity

    Grades by review (2)
    1 review + 1 video, average 8.0/10. We use 5 reviews; the 3 missing count as the category's typical 8.0: (8.0 × 2 + 8.0 × 3) ÷ 5 = 8.0. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    5.0 vs 7.0
  • 8.5% worse value for money
    This smartwatch has a lower value-for-money score than the average smartwatch (7.16 vs 7.8).
    7.16 vs 7.76
  • No VO2 max measurement
    This smartwatch does not measure VO2 max, the average smartwatch does. 51.3% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • No blood oxygen monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support blood oxygen monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 69.6% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
  • No irregular heart rate alerts
    This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does. 50.6% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • No stress monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support stress monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 68.7% of smartwatches support stress monitoring.
  • 1 years older
    This smartwatch was released earlier than the average smartwatch (2020 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    October 2020
    2020 vs 2021
  • No elevation tracking
    This smartwatch does not support elevation tracking, the average smartwatch does. 67.6% of smartwatches support elevation tracking.
  • No barometer
    This smartwatch does not include a barometer, the average smartwatch does. 53.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • No coaching features
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 58.8% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • No route support
    This smartwatch does not support route support, the average smartwatch does. 54.4% of smartwatches support route support.
  • 76 fewer exercise types
    This smartwatch includes fewer exercise types than the average smartwatch (14 vs 90). The average smartwatch includes 90 exercise types.
    14 vs 90
  • No voice feedback
    This smartwatch does not support voice feedback, the average smartwatch does. 63.5% of smartwatches support voice feedback.
  • 95 mAh smaller battery capacity
    This smartwatch has a smaller battery than the average smartwatch (210 mAh vs 305 mAh). The average smartwatch has a 305 mAh battery.
    210 mAh vs 305 mAh
  • 30 min slower charging
    This smartwatch charges more slowly than the average smartwatch (150 min vs 120 min). The average smartwatch takes 120 min to charge from empty.
    150 min vs 120 min
  • 1 h shorter GPS battery life
    This smartwatch lasts less time with GPS on than the average smartwatch (20 h vs 21 h). The average smartwatch lasts 21 h with GPS on.
    Up to 7 days of active use and 40 days in standby.
    20 h vs 21 h
  • More basic display
    This smartwatch uses a more basic screen than the average smartwatch (TFT LCD vs AMOLED).
    TFT LCD vs AMOLED
  • No always-on display
    This smartwatch does not have an always-on display, the average smartwatch does. 70.3% of smartwatches have an always-on display.
  • 47 m shallower water rating
    This smartwatch is rated for shallower water than the average smartwatch (3 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch is rated to 50 m.
    3 m vs 50 m
  • No ambient light sensor
    This smartwatch does not include an ambient light sensor, the average smartwatch does. 63.5% of smartwatches include an ambient light sensor.
  • 0.1 inch smaller display
    This smartwatch has a smaller screen than the average smartwatch (1.3 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch has a 1.4 inch screen.
    1.3 inch vs 1.4 inch
  • Lower resolution
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 240x240, while the average smartwatch reaches 360x360.
    240x240 vs 360x360
  • 65 ppi less sharp screen
    This smartwatch has a less sharp screen than the average smartwatch (261 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch has a pixel density of 326 ppi.
    261 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • Less practical form
    This smartwatch uses a rectangular form, while the average smartwatch uses round.
    rectangular vs round
  • Basic band material
    This smartwatch uses tpu for the band material, while the average smartwatch uses silicone.
    tpu vs silicone
  • No third-party apps
    This smartwatch does not support third-party apps, the average smartwatch does. 51.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • No music playback
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 57.1% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No voice assistant
    This smartwatch does not support voice assistants, the average smartwatch does. 69.2% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
  • No call answering
    This smartwatch does not support call answering, the average smartwatch does. 60% of smartwatches support call answering.
  • No voice command support
    This smartwatch does not support voice commands, the average smartwatch does. 68.1% of smartwatches support voice commands.
  • No call controls
    This smartwatch does not offer call control, the average smartwatch does. 91.2% of smartwatches offer call control.
  • No passcode
    This smartwatch does not include passcode protection, the average smartwatch does. 70.4% of smartwatches include passcode protection.
  • No widget support
    This smartwatch does not support widgets, the average smartwatch does. 84.4% of smartwatches support widgets.
  • No gesture control
    This smartwatch does not support gesture control, the average smartwatch does. 79.6% of smartwatches support gesture control.
  • No speaker
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.7% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.
  • 1 fewer microphones
    This smartwatch has fewer microphones than the average smartwatch (0 vs 1). The average smartwatch has 1 microphones.
    0 vs 1

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
Frankie Tech
≈ estimated
31/10/2020
First look · unboxing and first impressions
Verdict
Ulefone Watch GPS is a solid smartwatch at a low price, though longer testing is still needed.
Not graded

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.0
smartzone.de
≈ estimated
02/01/2021
Hands-on test · GPS fitness watch
Verdict
The Ulefone Watch GPS is a simple sports watch with built-in GPS that suits beginners, though its battery needed charging after six days.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Ulefone Watch GPS

  • Exceptional battery life, with some users reporting up to 40-50 days on a single charge
  • Solid build quality featuring a metallic edge and comfortable, soft wrist strap
  • Effective basic health tracking including 24-hour heart rate and sleep monitoring
  • High water resistance (5 ATM) suitable for swimming and daily wear
  • Excellent value for money given its low price point

What customers don't like about Ulefone Watch GPS

  • Unreliable built-in GPS that frequently loses connection or tracks distance inaccurately during outdoor activities
  • Poor screen visibility in direct sunlight due to low display brightness
  • The companion app (VeryFit Pro) is described as basic and lacking advanced features
  • Limited smart features, such as the inability to answer calls directly from the watch
  • Occasional software reliability issues, including reports of device reboots or short-term hardware failure

Verdict

The Ulefone Watch GPS is a lightweight 35g smartwatch featuring a 1.3-inch TFT-LCD square touch display with 240 x 240 resolution and 2.5D curved glass. Key characteristics include its 5 ATM water resistance, built-in high-precision GPS for real-time tracking, and 14 dedicated sports modes. Its primary pros are its impressive 210mAh battery that offers up to 40 days of standby or 7 days of active use, and comprehensive health monitoring including 24/7 heart rate tracking via the HX3600 sensor, sleep analysis, and female health tracking. However, cons include its reliance on an older Bluetooth 4.0/4.2 standard, the lack of built-in Wi-Fi, and the inability to answer phone calls directly from the wrist.

Compare Ulefone Watch GPS with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Ulefone Watch GPS and other Smartwatches

No results found