OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Smartwatches Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 3,488 independent expert reviews and 5,192 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v2.0

Amazfit GTR 2 Review | 126 Data compared

Avg. price:~£60Screen size:1.39 inchBattery life:14 daysDisplay type:AMOLED

Amazfit GTR 2 Review: Compare 126 technical specifications and 20 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

7.7

Overall score

Score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartwatch's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartwatches on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 81% of models
Score components

70%

7.5

Technical score

30%

8.3

Review score ( 8 · 12)

Review score 30% · 8.3 · based on 20 independent reviews
Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 30%, technical score 70%. This model has enough reviews, so its review score is the weighted average of their grades. 10 more reviews are not scored yet.
â–²Better than 81% of smartwatches
7.5

Technical score

Technical score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 77% of models
Score components

24%

6.6

Health

21%

9.3

Fitness

16%

8.8

Battery

14%

6.0

Smart features

12%

6.5

Connectivity

9%

7.4

Display & Design

4%

6.7

Hardware

â–²Better than 77% of smartwatches
8.3

Review score

Review score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 85% of models
Grades by review (20)
8 reviews: 1 with a printed score, 7 estimated from the review. 12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 2
≈ estimated
2

7.3%

9.0

bestwatchesreviews.org

7.3%

8.0

gsmarena.com

Video reviews 3

3.6%

9.5

Vids Tube

3.6%

5.0

Lim Reviews

1.8%

7.0

The Product Lab

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
â–²Better than 85% of smartwatches
  • amazfit-gtr-2
  • amazfit-gtr-2
  • amazfit-gtr-2
  • amazfit-gtr-2
  • amazfit-gtr-2
  • amazfit-gtr-2
  • amazfit-gtr-2
  • amazfit-gtr-2
amazfit-gtr-2
amazfit-gtr-2
amazfit-gtr-2
amazfit-gtr-2
amazfit-gtr-2
amazfit-gtr-2
amazfit-gtr-2
amazfit-gtr-2

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Amazfit GTR 2

Technical score
Technical score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 77% of models
Score components:

24%

6.6

Health

21%

9.3

Fitness

16%

8.8

Battery

14%

6.0

Smart features

12%

6.5

Connectivity

9%

7.4

Display & Design

4%

6.7

Hardware

7.5
Review score
Review score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 85% of models
Grades by review (20)
8 reviews: 1 with a printed score, 7 estimated from the review. 12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 2
≈ estimated
2

7.3%

9.0

bestwatchesreviews.org

7.3%

8.0

gsmarena.com

Video reviews 3

3.6%

9.5

Vids Tube

3.6%

5.0

Lim Reviews

1.8%

7.0

The Product Lab

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
8.3
Popularity
Popularity
9.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartwatch.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 91% of models
Popularity:
Amazfit GTR 2 has a popularity of 9.7 points, which is higher than 91% of smartwatches.
9.7
Value for money
Value for money
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 86% of models
Score components:

60%

7.7

Overall score

40%

10

Price

8.4
Brand name
Amazfit
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
â–² Better than 11% of models
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 10.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
â–² Better than 33% of models
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 33.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
ECG
no
â–¼ Worse than 17% of models
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
â–² Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings. 51.9% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
Accelerometer
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.6% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
yes
Barometer
yes
â–² Better than 51% of models
This smartwatch includes a barometer. 50.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
Gyroscope
yes
â–² Better than 30% of models
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 30.2% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
no
Cadence sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 31.2% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
Distance tracking
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 4.1% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery life
14 days
Battery life
14 days
â–² Better than 77% of models
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch offers a battery life of 14 days which is longer than that of 76.9% of smartwatches and equal to that of 9.2% of smartwatches.
Up to 38 days in basic watch mode.
Battery life in training mode
43 h
Battery life in training mode
43 h
â–² Better than 88% of models
Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
This smartwatch lasts 43 h in training mode which is longer than 87.9% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.2% of smartwatches.
Battery life with GPS on
48 h
Battery life with GPS on
48 h
★ Better than 91% of models
Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
This smartwatch lasts 48 h with GPS on which is longer than 91% of smartwatches and equal to that of 1.9% of smartwatches.
Battery power
471 mAh
Battery power
471 mAh
â–² Better than 89% of models
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a battery capacity of 471 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 89.2% of smartwatches and equal to those in 0.3% of smartwatches.
Charge time
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Zepp OS
Operating system
Zepp OS
â–² Better than 60% of models
This smartwatch runs Zepp OS which is more advanced than the operating system in 60.2% of smartwatches and the same as that in 6.5% of smartwatches.
Software update frequency
ended
Software update frequency
ended
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
This smartwatch has ended software update support which is less active than that of 42.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 57.5% of smartwatches.
Third-party app support
no
Third-party app support
no
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
This smartwatch does not support third-party apps. 47.7% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
Voice assistant support
yes
â–² Better than 32% of models
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 32.4% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
Cellular module
no
â–¼ Worse than 18% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 18% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
1
SIM cards
1
â–² Better than 2% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This smartwatch uses 1 for cellular connectivity which is more advanced than that of 2% of smartwatches and the same as that of 98% of smartwatches.
eSIM
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
â–² Better than 44% of models
This smartwatch supports GPS. 43.9% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
â–¼ Worse than 39% of models
This smartwatch does not support Galileo navigation. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Compass
yes
Compass
yes
â–² Better than 47% of models
This smartwatch includes a compass. 47.5% of smartwatches include a compass.
Show more
Screen size
1.39 inch
Screen size
1.39 inch
â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
This smartwatch has a screen size of 1.39 inch which is smaller than the screens of 51.3% of smartwatches and equal to those of 9.5% of smartwatches.
Display type
AMOLED
Display type
AMOLED
â–² Better than 50% of models
This smartwatch uses a AMOLED display type which is more advanced than that of 49.9% of smartwatches and the same as that of 50.1% of smartwatches.
Resolution
454x 454
Resolution
454x 454
â–² Better than 80% of models
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 454x454 which is higher than that of 79.9% of smartwatches and equal to that of 6.7% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
462 ppi
Pixel density
462 ppi
★ Better than 91% of models
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 462 ppi which is higher than that of 91.1% of smartwatches and equal to that of 5% of smartwatches.
Display brightness
450 nits
Display brightness
450 nits
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
This smartwatch reaches 450 nits of display brightness, which is lower than that of 86.2% of smartwatches and equal to that of 6.5% of smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
1 GHz
CPU speed
1 GHz
â–¼ Worse than 40% of models
This smartwatch uses a CPU configuration of 1 GHz which is faster than that in 29.2% of smartwatches and equal to that in 31.2% of smartwatches.
Processor model
?
RAM
?
Internal storage
3 GB
Internal storage
3 GB
â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch uses 3 GB for internal storage which is smaller than that of 59.8% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.8% of smartwatches.
External memory slot
no
External memory slot
no
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Amazfit GTR 2 vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • 28 h longer GPS battery life
    Battery life with GPS on
    48 h
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
    This smartwatch lasts longer with GPS on than the average smartwatch (48 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h.
    48 h vs 20 h
  • 7 days day/s longer battery life
    Battery life
    14 days
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 14 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    Up to 38 days in basic watch mode.
    14 days vs 7 days
  • HRV tracking
    HRV tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 40.8% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • 23.75 h longer training battery life
    Battery life in training mode
    43 h
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
    This smartwatch lasts longer in training mode than the average smartwatch (43 h vs 19.25 h). The average smartwatch lasts 19.25 h.
    43 h vs 19.25 h
  • VO2 max measurement
    VO2 max measurement
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch measures VO2 max, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • NFC functionality
    NFC
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 43.4% of smartwatches support NFC.
    NFC hardware is present, but functionality may be limited by region/app support.
  • Irregular heart rate alerts
    Irregular heart rate warnings
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does not. 48.1% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • More advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Zepp OS
    â–² Better than 60% of models
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Zepp OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Zepp OS vs Proprietary OS
  • 58.8% more popular
    Amazfit GTR 2 has a higher popularity than the average smartwatch (9.72 vs 6.1).
    9.72 vs 6.12
  • 12% better value for money
    Amazfit GTR 2 has a higher value-for-money score than the average smartwatch (8.42 vs 7.5).
    8.42 vs 7.52
  • HRV tracking
    HRV tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 40.8% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • VO2 max measurement
    VO2 max measurement
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch measures VO2 max, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • Irregular heart rate alerts
    Irregular heart rate warnings
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does not. 48.1% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • Calorie tracking
    Calorie tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.6% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
    Food logging may require a companion or third-party app.
  • Barometer sensor included
    Barometer
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This smartwatch includes a barometer, the average smartwatch does not. 49.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • Route support
    Route support
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch supports route support, the average smartwatch does not. 50% of smartwatches support route support.
  • 28 h longer GPS battery life
    Battery life with GPS on
    48 h
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
    This smartwatch lasts longer with GPS on than the average smartwatch (48 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h.
    48 h vs 20 h
  • 7 days day/s longer battery life
    Battery life
    14 days
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 14 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    Up to 38 days in basic watch mode.
    14 days vs 7 days
  • 23.75 h longer training battery life
    Battery life in training mode
    43 h
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
    This smartwatch lasts longer in training mode than the average smartwatch (43 h vs 19.25 h). The average smartwatch lasts 19.25 h.
    43 h vs 19.25 h
  • 171 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery life
    471 mAh days
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch has a larger battery capacity than the average smartwatch (471 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    Up to 38 days in basic watch mode.
    471 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • NFC functionality
    NFC
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 43.4% of smartwatches support NFC.
    NFC hardware is present, but functionality may be limited by region/app support.
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    Wi-Fi support
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.3% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
    Wi-Fi is supported with limited use scope (e.g., updates/transfer).
  • 136 ppi higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    462 ppi
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
    This smartwatch has a higher pixel density than the average smartwatch (462 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch display reaches 326 ppi.
    462 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • 13.5 g lighter weight
    Weight
    31.5 g
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is lighter than the average smartwatch (31.5 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    Weight refers to watch case without strap/band.
    31.5 g vs 45.0 g
  • Better case material
    Case material
    aluminum, stainless steel
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    This smartwatch uses aluminum, stainless steel for the case material, while the average smartwatch uses polycarbonate.
    aluminum, stainless steel vs polycarbonate
  • Higher resolution
    Display type
    454 x 454
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 454x454, while the average smartwatch reaches 352x430.
    454x454 vs 352x430
  • 0.9 mm thinner watch body
    Thickness
    10.70 mm
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <9.8 mm – >14.1 mm
    This smartwatch is thinner than the average smartwatch (10.7 mm vs 11.6 mm). The average smartwatch thickness is 11.6 mm.
    Some sources mention variant-dependent thickness values.
    10.70 mm vs 11.6 mm
  • Better band material
    Band material
    silicone, leather
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch uses silicone, leather for the band material, while the average smartwatch uses silicone.
    silicone, leather vs silicone
  • More advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Zepp OS
    â–² Better than 60% of models
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Zepp OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Zepp OS vs Proprietary OS
  • No cycle tracking
    Menstrual cycle tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartwatch does not support menstrual cycle tracking, the average smartwatch does. 64.3% of smartwatches support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • 150 nits lower display brightness
    Display brightness
    450 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
    This smartwatch has lower display brightness than the average smartwatch (450 nits vs 600 nits). The average smartwatch reaches 600 nits.
    450 nits vs 600 nits
  • 4.4 mm wider watch width
    Width
    46.4 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <34.6 mm – >46.8 mm
    This smartwatch is wider than the average smartwatch (46.4 mm vs 42 mm). The average smartwatch width is 42.0 mm.
    46.4 mm vs 42.0 mm
  • 1 year/s older release date
    Release date
    2020
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This smartwatch is an older model than the average smartwatch (2020 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    September 2020
    2020 vs 2021
  • No cycle tracking
    Menstrual cycle tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartwatch does not support menstrual cycle tracking, the average smartwatch does. 64.3% of smartwatches support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • 150 nits lower display brightness
    Display brightness
    450 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
    This smartwatch has lower display brightness than the average smartwatch (450 nits vs 600 nits). The average smartwatch reaches 600 nits.
    450 nits vs 600 nits
  • 4.4 mm wider watch width
    Width
    46.4 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <34.6 mm – >46.8 mm
    This smartwatch is wider than the average smartwatch (46.4 mm vs 42 mm). The average smartwatch width is 42.0 mm.
    46.4 mm vs 42.0 mm
  • 1 year/s older release date
    Release date
    2020
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This smartwatch is an older model than the average smartwatch (2020 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    September 2020
    2020 vs 2021

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.5
Vids Tube
≈ estimated
15/02/2021
In-depth review · battery, fitness and sleep tests
Verdict
Amazfit GTR 2 is a strong Apple Watch alternative for iPhone users, with good battery life and sleep tracking.
5.0
Lim Reviews
≈ estimated
17/10/2020
Hands-on review · one week of GPS, sleep, SpO2 and battery tests
Verdict
Amazfit GTR 2 looks nice, but its GPS, sleep, SpO2 and battery fall short for serious tracking.
7.0
The Product Lab
≈ estimated
10/05/2021
Short review · daily use, battery and running limits
Verdict
Amazfit GTR 2 is a solid all-day wearable with good sleep tracking, but it is weaker for running.
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

What reviewers agree on

Based on 11 · 12

The sharp display and comfortable design win praise, battery life divides opinion, and the companion app and Alexa disappoint.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

9.0
china-gadgets.de
≈ estimated
26/07/2022
Hands-on test · Sport and sleep
Verdict
The Amazfit GTR 2 is a stylish watch with fast GPS and music storage, but its battery lasts about 10 days, short of the 14 days promised.
elespanol.com
02/12/2020
Not graded yet
elespanol.com
15/12/2020
Not graded yet
9.0
topesdegama.com
≈ estimated
29/01/2025
Hands-on review · Running and walking
Verdict
The Amazfit GTR 2 suits runners and walkers, with a bright AMOLED screen and about 10 days of battery, though GPS can be slow to lock.
8.0
rpp.pe
≈ estimated
30/11/2021
Hands-on test · Fitness and health
Verdict
The Amazfit GTR 2 is a light, comfortable watch for fitness and health tracking, with long battery life, though it runs no third-party apps.
iphoneitalia.com
20/01/2021
Not graded yet
9.6
robadainformatici.it
✓ explicit
28/10/2025
Full review · Screen and battery
Verdict
The Amazfit GTR 2 is a light, high-quality watch with a sharp screen and about 14 days of battery, though calls need your phone nearby.

Third-party reviews

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Amazfit GTR 2

  • Premium design with a sleek, borderless AMOLED display
  • Excellent battery life (up to 14 days in typical use)
  • Built-in speaker and microphone for Bluetooth phone calls
  • Local music storage (3GB) for phone-free listening
  • Comprehensive health tracking (Heart Rate, SpO2, Sleep, Stress)
  • Built-in GPS and Alexa voice assistant integration
  • Lightweight and comfortable for all-day wear

What we don't like about Amazfit GTR 2

  • Lack of third-party app support and limited ecosystem
  • Inconsistent GPS and heart rate accuracy during high-intensity workouts
  • Always-on display (AOD) significantly drains battery life
  • Cannot reply to notifications directly from the watch
  • Music storage does not support streaming services like Spotify
  • Zepp companion app can be unintuitive and prone to bugs
  • NFC payments are often restricted to specific regions (e.g., China)

Verdict

The Amazfit GTR 2 is a versatile smartwatch featuring a vibrant 1.39-inch AMOLED display with 326ppi pixel density and 3D curved, bezel-less glass. Key specifications include a 471mAh battery providing up to 14 days of typical usage, 5 ATM water resistance, and 3GB of local music storage. It is equipped with the BioTracker 2 PPG sensor for 24-hour heart rate monitoring, SpO2 measurement, sleep tracking, and supports 90+ sports modes with built-in GPS. Main pros include its premium design, built-in Alexa, and the ability to answer Bluetooth calls directly via its speaker and microphone. However, notable cons include the lack of third-party app support due to its custom OS, occasional inaccuracies in high-intensity heart rate tracking, and a somewhat slow GPS connection.

Compare Amazfit GTR 2 with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Amazfit GTR 2 and other Smartwatches

No results found