OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Smartwatches Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 3,488 independent expert reviews and 5,192 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v2.0

Kieslect Lora 2 Review | 126 Data compared

Avg. price:~£70Screen size:1.30 inchBattery life:4 daysDisplay type:AMOLED

Kieslect Lora 2 Review: Compare 126 technical specifications and 2 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

6.4

Overall score

Score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartwatch's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartwatches on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
Score components

70%

6.1

Technical score

30%

7.1

Review score ( 0 · 2)

Review score 30% · 7.1 · based on 2 videos
2 videos count as 0.8 of the 5 needed; the rest counts as 7/10. Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 30%, technical score 70%. A video or a short review counts less than a full test.
â–¼Worse than 57% of smartwatches
6.1

Technical score

Technical score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
Score components

24%

5.5

Health

21%

7.5

Fitness

16%

5.1

Battery

14%

6.6

Smart features

12%

4.6

Connectivity

9%

7.1

Display & Design

4%

6.8

Hardware

â–¼Worse than 53% of smartwatches
7.1

Review score

Review score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Grades by review (2)
2 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Video reviews 2

10%

8.0

Fredy Us

5%

7.0

Tech Travellers Hub

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 80% of smartwatches
  • kieslect-lora-2
  • kieslect-lora-2
  • kieslect-lora-2
  • kieslect-lora-2
  • kieslect-lora-2
kieslect-lora-2
kieslect-lora-2
kieslect-lora-2
kieslect-lora-2
kieslect-lora-2

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Kieslect Lora 2

Technical score
Technical score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
Score components:

24%

5.5

Health

21%

7.5

Fitness

16%

5.1

Battery

14%

6.6

Smart features

12%

4.6

Connectivity

9%

7.1

Display & Design

4%

6.8

Hardware

6.1
Review score
Review score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Grades by review (2)
2 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Video reviews 2

10%

8.0

Fredy Us

5%

7.0

Tech Travellers Hub

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
7.1
Popularity
Popularity
4.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartwatch.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
Popularity:
Kieslect Lora 2 has a popularity of 4.2 points, which is lower than 63.4% of smartwatches.
4.2
Value for money
Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
Score components:

60%

6.4

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.5
Brand name
Kieslect
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
â–² Better than 11% of models
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 10.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
â–² Better than 33% of models
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 33.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
ECG
no
â–¼ Worse than 17% of models
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
â–² Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings. 51.9% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
Supports abnormal high/low heart-rate alerts (typically after inactivity).
Show more
Accelerometer
yes
Accelerometer
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.6% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
no
Barometer
no
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
This smartwatch does not include a barometer. 49.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
no
Gyroscope
no
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
This smartwatch does not include a gyroscope. 70% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
yes
Cadence sensor
yes
â–² Better than 69% of models
This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor. 69% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Tracks running cadence natively; cycling cadence may require an external sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
Distance tracking
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 4.1% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
Battery life
4 days
Battery life
4 days
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch offers a battery life of 4 days which is shorter than that of 70.5% of smartwatches and equal to that of 2.9% of smartwatches.
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery power
255 mAh
Battery power
255 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a battery capacity of 255 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 69.4% of smartwatches and equal to those in 0.9% of smartwatches.
Charge time
120 min
Charge time
120 min
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges in 120 min which is faster than 13.1% of smartwatches and equal to the charge time of 44.2% of smartwatches.
Show more
Operating system
Kieslect OS
Operating system
Kieslect OS
â–² Better than 51% of models
This smartwatch runs Kieslect OS which is more advanced than the operating system in 50.6% of smartwatches and the same as that in 0.3% of smartwatches.
Software update frequency
?
Third-party app support
no
Third-party app support
no
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
This smartwatch does not support third-party apps. 47.7% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
Voice assistant support
yes
â–² Better than 32% of models
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 32.4% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
Cellular module
no
Cellular module
no
â–¼ Worse than 18% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 18% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
no
GPS
no
â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
This smartwatch does not support GPS. 56.2% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
yes
Galileo support
yes
â–² Better than 62% of models
This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation. 61.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Compass
no
Compass
no
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This smartwatch does not include a compass. 52.7% of smartwatches include a compass.
Show more
Screen size
1.3 inch
Screen size
1.3 inch
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
This smartwatch has a screen size of 1.3 inch which is smaller than the screens of 66.8% of smartwatches and equal to those of 11.2% of smartwatches.
Display type
AMOLED
Display type
AMOLED
â–² Better than 50% of models
This smartwatch uses a AMOLED display type which is more advanced than that of 49.9% of smartwatches and the same as that of 50.1% of smartwatches.
Resolution
360x 360
Resolution
360x 360
â–² Better than 50% of models
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 360x360 which is higher than that of 50.2% of smartwatches and equal to that of 6.7% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
392 ppi
Pixel density
392 ppi
â–² Better than 66% of models
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 392 ppi which is higher than that of 66.2% of smartwatches and equal to that of 2.7% of smartwatches.
Display brightness
?
Show more
CPU speed
2x 0.24 GHz
CPU speed
2x 0.24 GHz
â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
This smartwatch uses a CPU configuration of 2x0.24 GHz which is slower than that in 73.2% of smartwatches and equal to that in 0.8% of smartwatches.
Processor model
?
RAM
?
Internal storage
0.128 GB
Internal storage
0.128 GB
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch uses 0.128 GB for internal storage which is smaller than that of 66.8% of smartwatches and equal to that of 3.4% of smartwatches.
128 MB internal storage.
External memory slot
no
External memory slot
no
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Kieslect Lora 2 vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • Emergency SOS
    Emergency SOS
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch includes Emergency SOS, the average smartwatch does not. 42.8% of smartwatches include Emergency SOS.
  • NFC functionality
    NFC
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 43.4% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • Irregular heart rate alerts
    Irregular heart rate warnings
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does not. 48.1% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
    Supports abnormal high/low heart-rate alerts (typically after inactivity).
  • Cadence tracking
    Cadence sensor
    yes
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 31.1% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
    Tracks running cadence natively; cycling cadence may require an external sensor.
  • Calorie tracking
    Calorie tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.6% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
    Food logging may require a companion or third-party app.
  • Supports ANT+
    ANT+ support
    yes
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    This smartwatch supports ANT+, the average smartwatch does not. 11.7% of smartwatches support ANT+.
  • Galileo satellite support
    Galileo support
    yes
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation, the average smartwatch does not. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
  • 22.7 g lighter weight
    Weight
    22.3 g
    ★ Better than 98% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is lighter than the average smartwatch (22.3 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    Weight refers to watch case without strap/band.
    22.3 g vs 45.0 g
  • Irregular heart rate alerts
    Irregular heart rate warnings
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does not. 48.1% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
    Supports abnormal high/low heart-rate alerts (typically after inactivity).
  • Calorie tracking
    Calorie tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.6% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
    Food logging may require a companion or third-party app.
  • Cadence tracking
    Cadence sensor
    yes
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 31.1% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
    Tracks running cadence natively; cycling cadence may require an external sensor.
  • 20 more exercise profiles
    Multi-sport mode
    100
    â–² Better than 32% of models
    This smartwatch supports more exercise modes than the average smartwatch (100 vs 80). The average smartwatch supports 80 exercise modes.
    Reported as at least 100 exercise modes.
    100 vs 80
  • NFC functionality
    NFC
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 43.4% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • Supports ANT+
    ANT+ support
    yes
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    This smartwatch supports ANT+, the average smartwatch does not. 11.7% of smartwatches support ANT+.
  • Galileo satellite support
    Galileo support
    yes
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation, the average smartwatch does not. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.2
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This smartwatch supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average smartwatch (5.2 vs 5). The average smartwatch uses 5.0.
    5.2 vs 5.0
  • 22.7 g lighter weight
    Weight
    22.3 g
    ★ Better than 98% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is lighter than the average smartwatch (22.3 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    Weight refers to watch case without strap/band.
    22.3 g vs 45.0 g
  • 2 mm narrower band
    Width of band
    20.0 mm
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    Market range: <20 mm – >22 mm
    This smartwatch has a narrower band width than the average smartwatch (20 mm vs 22 mm). The average smartwatch band is 22.0 mm wide.
    20.0 mm vs 22.0 mm
  • 66 ppi higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    392 ppi
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
    This smartwatch has a higher pixel density than the average smartwatch (392 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch display reaches 326 ppi.
    392 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • Emergency SOS
    Emergency SOS
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch includes Emergency SOS, the average smartwatch does not. 42.8% of smartwatches include Emergency SOS.
  • More advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Kieslect OS
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Kieslect OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Kieslect OS vs Proprietary OS
  • 2 year/s newer release date
    Release date
    2023
    â–² Better than 70% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This smartwatch has a newer release date than the average smartwatch (2023 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    June 2023
    2023 vs 2021
  • No GPS support
    Route support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches support GPS.
  • No elevation tracking
    Elevation tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartwatch does not support elevation tracking, the average smartwatch does. 64.3% of smartwatches support elevation tracking.
  • 48.5 m lower water resistance depth
    Waterproof depth rating
    1.5 m
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <1 m – >50 m
    This smartwatch has a shallower waterproof rating than the average smartwatch (1.5 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch reaches 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1.5 m vs 50 m
  • No music playback
    Music playback
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 54.2% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No auto-pause
    Auto pause
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This smartwatch does not support auto pause, the average smartwatch does. 59.3% of smartwatches support auto pause.
  • No gyroscope
    Gyroscope
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a gyroscope, the average smartwatch does. 69.9% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
  • No compass
    Compass
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a compass, the average smartwatch does. 52.6% of smartwatches include a compass.
  • 3 days day/s shorter battery life
    Battery life
    4 days
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 4 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    4 days vs 7 days
  • 46.4% less popular
    Kieslect Lora 2 has a lower popularity than the average smartwatch (4.18 vs 6.1).
    4.18 vs 6.12
  • No smart scale support
    Smart scale compatibility
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support smart scale compatibility, the average smartwatch does. 53.7% of smartwatches support smart scale compatibility.
  • No elevation tracking
    Elevation tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartwatch does not support elevation tracking, the average smartwatch does. 64.3% of smartwatches support elevation tracking.
  • No auto-pause
    Auto pause
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This smartwatch does not support auto pause, the average smartwatch does. 59.3% of smartwatches support auto pause.
  • No gyroscope
    Gyroscope
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a gyroscope, the average smartwatch does. 69.9% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
  • No achievement tracking
    Achievements
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    This smartwatch does not support achievements, the average smartwatch does. 85.8% of smartwatches support achievements.
  • 3 days day/s shorter battery life
    Battery life
    4 days
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 4 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    4 days vs 7 days
  • 45 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery life
    255 mAh days
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartwatch (255 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    255 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • No GPS support
    Route support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches support GPS.
  • No compass
    Compass
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a compass, the average smartwatch does. 52.6% of smartwatches include a compass.
  • 48.5 m lower water resistance depth
    Waterproof depth rating
    1.5 m
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <1 m – >50 m
    This smartwatch has a shallower waterproof rating than the average smartwatch (1.5 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch reaches 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1.5 m vs 50 m
  • 0.1 inch smaller screen size
    Screen size
    1.30 inch
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
    This smartwatch has a smaller screen size than the average smartwatch (1.3 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch screen is 1.40 inch.
    1.30 inch vs 1.40 inch
  • No music playback
    Music playback
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 54.2% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No smart alarm
    Smart alarm
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 52.7% of smartwatches support smart alarms.
  • No gesture control
    Gesture control
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    This smartwatch does not support gesture control, the average smartwatch does. 77.7% of smartwatches support gesture control.
  • 3.87 GB less storage
    Internal storage
    0.128 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
    This smartwatch offers less internal storage than the average smartwatch (0.1 GB vs 4 GB). The average smartwatch provides 4 GB of storage.
    128 MB internal storage.
    0.128 GB vs 4 GB
  • Slower CPU speed
    CPU speed
    2 x 0.24 GHz
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    This smartwatch uses a CPU configuration of 2x0.24 GHz, while the average smartwatch uses 1 GHz.
    2x0.24 GHz vs 1 GHz

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded yet
Hands-on video, no verdict
Shop video
Not graded

Third-party reviews

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Kieslect Lora 2

  • Premium slim and lightweight aluminum alloy design
  • Vibrant 1.3-inch HD AMOLED display with vivid colors and deep blacks
  • Stable Bluetooth 5.2 calling with crystal-clear audio quality
  • Comprehensive 24H health monitoring (heart rate, SpO2, and sleep tracking)
  • Long-lasting battery life, with up to 5-7 days of typical usage
  • IP68 waterproof rating suitable for rain and swimming

What we don't like about Kieslect Lora 2

  • GloryFit companion app is frequently cited as buggy and difficult to use
  • Notifications sometimes only show icons rather than full message content
  • Hardware durability concerns, specifically regarding the digital crown
  • Lacks built-in GPS, requiring a smartphone for route tracking
  • Occasional software glitches, such as freezing or random restarts
  • Step counting can occasionally be inaccurate or jump unexpectedly

Verdict

The Kieslect Lora 2 is a health-focused lady's smartwatch featuring a 1.3-inch HD AMOLED display with 360x360 resolution and an ultra-thin, mirror-finished aluminum alloy frame. Key characteristics include stable Bluetooth 5.2 calling, over 100 sports modes, and 24-hour health management covering heart rate, SpO2, sleep, and menstrual cycle tracking. Its main pros are a vibrant screen, a lightweight IP68-rated waterproof design, and a battery providing 3.5 to 5 days of typical usage. On the downside, the device lacks built-in GPS and NFC support, and has a limited third-party app ecosystem.

Compare Kieslect Lora 2 with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Kieslect Lora 2 and other Smartwatches

No results found