OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Smartwatches Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 3,488 independent expert reviews and 5,192 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v2.0

Mobvoi Ticwatch Pro 3 Review | 126 Data compared

Avg. price:~£60Screen size:1.40 inchBattery life:3 daysDisplay type:AMOLED

Mobvoi Ticwatch Pro 3 Review: Compare 126 technical specifications and 22 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

7.7

Overall score

Score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartwatch's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartwatches on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 79% of models
Score components

70%

7.4

Technical score

30%

8.4

Review score ( 10 · 12)

Review score 30% · 8.4 · based on 22 independent reviews
Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 30%, technical score 70%. This model has enough reviews, so its review score is the weighted average of their grades. 7 more reviews are not scored yet.
▲Better than 79% of smartwatches
7.4

Technical score

Technical score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 75% of models
Score components

24%

6.0

Health

21%

9.6

Fitness

16%

5.3

Battery

14%

7.8

Smart features

12%

8.8

Connectivity

9%

7.3

Display & Design

4%

6.5

Hardware

▲Better than 75% of smartwatches
8.4

Review score

Review score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 86% of models
Grades by review (22)
10 reviews: 5 with a printed score, 5 estimated from the review. 12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 5
✓ explicit
3

7.7%

7.8

techgearlab.com

7.7%

6.5

theverge.com

6.2%

9.0

androidcentral.com

≈ estimated
2

6.2%

9.0

gsmarena.com

6.2%

9.0

threadcurve.com

Video reviews 3

3.1%

9.0

Tinker Forward

3.1%

9.0

MrMobile [Michael Fisher]

3.1%

9.0

Tech Spurt

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
▲Better than 86% of smartwatches
  • No image
No image

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Mobvoi Ticwatch Pro 3

Technical score
Technical score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 75% of models
Score components:

24%

6.0

Health

21%

9.6

Fitness

16%

5.3

Battery

14%

7.8

Smart features

12%

8.8

Connectivity

9%

7.3

Display & Design

4%

6.5

Hardware

7.4
Review score
Review score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 86% of models
Grades by review (22)
10 reviews: 5 with a printed score, 5 estimated from the review. 12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 5
✓ explicit
3

7.7%

7.8

techgearlab.com

7.7%

6.5

theverge.com

6.2%

9.0

androidcentral.com

≈ estimated
2

6.2%

9.0

gsmarena.com

6.2%

9.0

threadcurve.com

Video reviews 3

3.1%

9.0

Tinker Forward

3.1%

9.0

MrMobile [Michael Fisher]

3.1%

9.0

Tech Spurt

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
8.4
Popularity
Popularity
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartwatch.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 85% of models
Popularity:
Mobvoi Ticwatch Pro 3 has a popularity of 9 points, which is higher than 85.4% of smartwatches.
9.0
Value for money
Value for money
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 86% of models
Score components:

60%

7.7

Overall score

40%

10

Price

8.4
Brand name
Mobvoi
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
▲ Better than 11% of models
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 10.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
▲ Better than 33% of models
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 33.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
Readings are for wellness use, not medical diagnosis.
ECG
no
ECG
no
▼ Worse than 17% of models
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
▲ Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings. 51.9% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
Accelerometer
yes
▲ Better than 1% of models
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.6% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
yes
Barometer
yes
▲ Better than 51% of models
This smartwatch includes a barometer. 50.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
Gyroscope
yes
▲ Better than 30% of models
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 30.2% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
yes
Cadence sensor
yes
▲ Better than 69% of models
This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor. 69% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
Distance tracking
yes
▲ Better than 4% of models
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 4.1% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
Battery life
3 days
Battery life
3 days
▼ Worse than 75% of models
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch offers a battery life of 3 days which is shorter than that of 74.8% of smartwatches and equal to that of 3.9% of smartwatches.
Up to 45 days in essential mode.
Battery life in training mode
20 h
Battery life in training mode
20 h
▲ Better than 51% of models
Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
This smartwatch lasts 20 h in training mode which is longer than 50.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 3.6% of smartwatches.
Battery life with GPS on
20 h
Battery life with GPS on
20 h
▼ Worse than 48% of models
Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
This smartwatch lasts 20 h with GPS on which is longer than 46.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 5.6% of smartwatches.
Battery power
496 mAh
Battery power
496 mAh
★ Better than 93% of models
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a battery capacity of 496 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 92.8% of smartwatches and equal to those in 0.2% of smartwatches.
Charge time
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Wear OS
Operating system
Wear OS
▲ Better than 79% of models
This smartwatch runs Wear OS which is more advanced than the operating system in 79% of smartwatches and the same as that in 16.6% of smartwatches.
Software update frequency
ended
Software update frequency
ended
▼ Worse than 43% of models
This smartwatch has ended software update support which is less active than that of 42.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 57.5% of smartwatches.
Third-party app support
yes
Third-party app support
yes
▲ Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports third-party apps. 52.4% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
Voice assistant support
yes
▲ Better than 32% of models
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 32.4% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
yes
Cellular module
yes
▲ Better than 82% of models
This smartwatch includes a cellular module. 82.2% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
Cellular support may depend on LTE/GPS+Cellular variant selection.
SIM cards
1
SIM cards
1
▲ Better than 2% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This smartwatch uses 1 for cellular connectivity which is more advanced than that of 2% of smartwatches and the same as that of 98% of smartwatches.
eSIM on LTE version only.
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
▲ Better than 44% of models
This smartwatch supports GPS. 43.9% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
yes
Galileo support
yes
▲ Better than 62% of models
This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation. 61.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Compass
no
Compass
no
▼ Worse than 53% of models
This smartwatch does not include a compass. 52.7% of smartwatches include a compass.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen size
1.4 inch
Screen size
1.4 inch
▲ Better than 49% of models
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
This smartwatch has a screen size of 1.4 inch which is larger than the screens of 48.8% of smartwatches and equal to those of 6.7% of smartwatches.
Display type
AMOLED
Display type
AMOLED
▲ Better than 50% of models
This smartwatch uses a AMOLED display type which is more advanced than that of 49.9% of smartwatches and the same as that of 50.1% of smartwatches.
Resolution
454x 454
Resolution
454x 454
▲ Better than 80% of models
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 454x454 which is higher than that of 79.9% of smartwatches and equal to that of 6.7% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
459 ppi
Pixel density
459 ppi
▲ Better than 78% of models
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 459 ppi which is higher than that of 78.1% of smartwatches and equal to that of 1% of smartwatches.
Display brightness
500 nits
Display brightness
500 nits
▼ Worse than 70% of models
Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
This smartwatch reaches 500 nits of display brightness, which is lower than that of 70% of smartwatches and equal to that of 15.6% of smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
4x 1.7 GHz
CPU speed
4x 1.7 GHz
★ Better than 91% of models
This smartwatch uses a CPU configuration of 4x1.7 GHz which is faster than that in 90.8% of smartwatches and equal to that in 8% of smartwatches.
Processor model
Snapdragon Wear 4100
Processor model
Snapdragon Wear 4100
▲ Better than 73% of models
This smartwatch uses the Snapdragon Wear 4100 processor model.
RAM
1 GB
RAM
1 GB
▲ Better than 31% of models
Market range: <0.5 GB – >2 GB
This smartwatch has 1 GB of RAM which is larger than the RAM in 31.3% of smartwatches and equal to that of 45.8% of smartwatches.
Internal storage
8 GB
Internal storage
8 GB
▲ Better than 68% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch uses 8 GB for internal storage which is larger than that of 67.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 12.1% of smartwatches.
External memory slot
no
External memory slot
no
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more
What reviewers say

Mobvoi Ticwatch Pro 3 vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • More advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Wear OS
    ▲ Better than 79% of models
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Wear OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Wear OS vs Proprietary OS
  • Built-in cellular module
    Cellular module
    yes
    ▲ Better than 82% of models
    This smartwatch includes a cellular module, the average smartwatch does not. 17.9% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
    Cellular support may depend on LTE/GPS+Cellular variant selection.
  • HRV tracking
    HRV tracking
    yes
    ▲ Better than 59% of models
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 40.8% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • Maps support
    Maps support
    yes
    ▲ Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 31.5% of smartwatches support maps.
    Maps via Google Maps app.
  • Emergency SOS
    Emergency SOS
    yes
    ▲ Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch includes Emergency SOS, the average smartwatch does not. 42.8% of smartwatches include Emergency SOS.
  • NFC functionality
    NFC
    yes
    ▲ Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 43.4% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • Third-party app support
    Third-party app support
    yes
    ▲ Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports third-party apps, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • Irregular heart rate alerts
    Irregular heart rate warnings
    yes
    ▲ Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does not. 48.1% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • 11.3% better value for money
    Mobvoi Ticwatch Pro 3 has a higher value-for-money score than the average smartwatch (8.37 vs 7.5).
    8.37 vs 7.52
  • 47.4% more popular
    Mobvoi Ticwatch Pro 3 has a higher popularity than the average smartwatch (9.02 vs 6.1).
    9.02 vs 6.12
  • HRV tracking
    HRV tracking
    yes
    ▲ Better than 59% of models
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 40.8% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • Irregular heart rate alerts
    Irregular heart rate warnings
    yes
    ▲ Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does not. 48.1% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • Calorie tracking
    Calorie tracking
    yes
    ▲ Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.6% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
  • Barometer sensor included
    Barometer
    yes
    ▲ Better than 51% of models
    This smartwatch includes a barometer, the average smartwatch does not. 49.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • Cadence tracking
    Cadence sensor
    yes
    ▲ Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 31.1% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
  • Route support
    Route support
    yes
    ▲ Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch supports route support, the average smartwatch does not. 50% of smartwatches support route support.
  • 20 more exercise profiles
    Multi-sport mode
    100
    ▲ Better than 32% of models
    This smartwatch supports more exercise modes than the average smartwatch (100 vs 80). The average smartwatch supports 80 exercise modes.
    Reported as at least 100 exercise modes.
    100 vs 80
  • 196 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery life
    496 mAh days
    ▼ Worse than 75% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch has a larger battery capacity than the average smartwatch (496 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    Up to 45 days in essential mode.
    496 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • Built-in cellular module
    Cellular module
    yes
    ▲ Better than 82% of models
    This smartwatch includes a cellular module, the average smartwatch does not. 17.9% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
    Cellular support may depend on LTE/GPS+Cellular variant selection.
  • Maps support
    Maps support
    yes
    ▲ Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 31.5% of smartwatches support maps.
    Maps via Google Maps app.
  • NFC functionality
    NFC
    yes
    ▲ Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 43.4% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    Wi-Fi support
    yes
    ▲ Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.3% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • Galileo satellite support
    Galileo support
    yes
    ▲ Better than 62% of models
    This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation, the average smartwatch does not. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
  • Stronger display glass
    Display glass type
    Corning Gorilla Glass 3
    ▲ Better than 58% of models
    This smartwatch uses Corning Gorilla Glass 3 display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 3 vs mineral glass
  • Rugged construction
    Rugged design
    yes
    ▲ Better than 62% of models
    This smartwatch has a rugged design, the average smartwatch does not. 37.9% of smartwatches have a rugged design.
    Rugged design supported by MIL-STD/military-grade durability claim.
  • 133 ppi higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    459 ppi
    ▲ Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
    This smartwatch has a higher pixel density than the average smartwatch (459 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch display reaches 326 ppi.
    459 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • Higher resolution
    Display type
    454 x 454
    ▲ Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 454x454, while the average smartwatch reaches 352x430.
    454x454 vs 352x430
  • Better case material
    Case material
    stainless steel, fiber-reinforced polymer
    ▲ Better than 56% of models
    This smartwatch uses stainless steel, fiber-reinforced polymer for the case material, while the average smartwatch uses polycarbonate.
    stainless steel, fiber-reinforced polymer vs polycarbonate
  • 10 °C higher max temperature
    Maximum operating temperature
    55.0 °C
    ▲ Better than 81% of models
    Market range: <35 °C – >60 °C
    This smartwatch handles a higher maximum operating temperature than the average smartwatch (55 °C vs 45 °C). The average smartwatch reaches 45.0 °C.
    55.0 °C vs 45.0 °C
  • More advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Wear OS
    ▲ Better than 79% of models
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Wear OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Wear OS vs Proprietary OS
  • Emergency SOS
    Emergency SOS
    yes
    ▲ Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch includes Emergency SOS, the average smartwatch does not. 42.8% of smartwatches include Emergency SOS.
  • Third-party app support
    Third-party app support
    yes
    ▲ Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports third-party apps, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • Faster CPU speed
    CPU speed
    4 x 1.7 GHz
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    This smartwatch uses a CPU configuration of 4x1.7 GHz, while the average smartwatch uses 1 GHz.
    4x1.7 GHz vs 1 GHz
  • More advanced processor model
    Processor model
    Snapdragon Wear 4100
    ▲ Better than 73% of models
    This smartwatch uses the Snapdragon Wear 4100 processor model, while the average smartwatch uses Silicon Labs EFM32 Giant Gecko.
    Snapdragon Wear 4,100 vs Silicon Labs EFM32 Giant Gecko
  • 48.5 m lower water resistance depth
    Waterproof depth rating
    1.5 m
    ▼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <1 m – >50 m
    This smartwatch has a shallower waterproof rating than the average smartwatch (1.5 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch reaches 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1.5 m vs 50 m
  • No compass
    Compass
    no
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a compass, the average smartwatch does. 52.6% of smartwatches include a compass.
  • No cycle tracking
    Menstrual cycle tracking
    no
    ▼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartwatch does not support menstrual cycle tracking, the average smartwatch does. 64.3% of smartwatches support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • 4 days day/s shorter battery life
    Battery life
    3 days
    ▼ Worse than 75% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 3 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    Up to 45 days in essential mode.
    3 days vs 7 days
  • Basic battery type
    Battery type
    Li-ion
    ▼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartwatch uses a Li-ion battery, while the average smartwatch uses Li-Po.
    Li-ion vs Li-Po
  • 100 nits lower display brightness
    Display brightness
    500 nits
    ▼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
    This smartwatch has lower display brightness than the average smartwatch (500 nits vs 600 nits). The average smartwatch reaches 600 nits.
    500 nits vs 600 nits
  • 0.6 mm thicker watch body
    Thickness
    12.20 mm
    ▼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <9.8 mm – >14.1 mm
    This smartwatch is thicker than the average smartwatch (12.2 mm vs 11.6 mm). The average smartwatch thickness is 11.6 mm.
    12.20 mm vs 11.6 mm
  • 5 mm wider watch width
    Width
    47.0 mm
    ▼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <34.6 mm – >46.8 mm
    This smartwatch is wider than the average smartwatch (47 mm vs 42 mm). The average smartwatch width is 42.0 mm.
    47.0 mm vs 42.0 mm
  • No cycle tracking
    Menstrual cycle tracking
    no
    ▼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartwatch does not support menstrual cycle tracking, the average smartwatch does. 64.3% of smartwatches support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • 4 days day/s shorter battery life
    Battery life
    3 days
    ▼ Worse than 75% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 3 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    Up to 45 days in essential mode.
    3 days vs 7 days
  • Basic battery type
    Battery type
    Li-ion
    ▼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartwatch uses a Li-ion battery, while the average smartwatch uses Li-Po.
    Li-ion vs Li-Po
  • No compass
    Compass
    no
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a compass, the average smartwatch does. 52.6% of smartwatches include a compass.
  • 48.5 m lower water resistance depth
    Waterproof depth rating
    1.5 m
    ▼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <1 m – >50 m
    This smartwatch has a shallower waterproof rating than the average smartwatch (1.5 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch reaches 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1.5 m vs 50 m
  • 100 nits lower display brightness
    Display brightness
    500 nits
    ▼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
    This smartwatch has lower display brightness than the average smartwatch (500 nits vs 600 nits). The average smartwatch reaches 600 nits.
    500 nits vs 600 nits
  • 0.6 mm thicker watch body
    Thickness
    12.20 mm
    ▼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <9.8 mm – >14.1 mm
    This smartwatch is thicker than the average smartwatch (12.2 mm vs 11.6 mm). The average smartwatch thickness is 11.6 mm.
    12.20 mm vs 11.6 mm
  • 5 mm wider watch width
    Width
    47.0 mm
    ▼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <34.6 mm – >46.8 mm
    This smartwatch is wider than the average smartwatch (47 mm vs 42 mm). The average smartwatch width is 42.0 mm.
    47.0 mm vs 42.0 mm
  • 3 mm taller watch height
    Height
    48.0 mm
    ▼ Worse than 81% of models
    Market range: <39.5 mm – >51 mm
    This smartwatch is taller than the average smartwatch (48 mm vs 45 mm). The average smartwatch height is 45 mm.
    48.0 mm vs 45 mm
  • 1 year/s older release date
    Release date
    2020
    ▼ Worse than 55% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This smartwatch is an older model than the average smartwatch (2020 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    October 2020
    2020 vs 2021

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Tinker Forward
≈ estimated
28/11/2020
Full review · unboxing, setup, apps and features
Verdict
Mobvoi Ticwatch Pro 3 is a great watch overall, though it is big and lacks both ECG and a slimmer, more modern design.
9.0
MrMobile [Michael Fisher]
≈ estimated
08/10/2020
Two-week test · battery, display and app review
Verdict
Mobvoi Ticwatch Pro 3 is finally a Wear OS watch worth using, with great battery life, though its design is dull.
9.0
Tech Spurt
≈ estimated
24/09/2020
Unboxing and one-week review · performance, battery and fitness
Verdict
Mobvoi Ticwatch Pro 3 is a strong all-around premium Wear OS watch that does everything well, though not revolutionary.
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

What reviewers agree on

Based on 10 · 13

Reviewers love the long battery life, smooth performance and dual display, but many criticise the apps and software experience.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

7.0
frandroid.com
✓ explicit
23/11/2021
Hands-on test · Snapdragon 4100 watch
Verdict
Mobvoi TicWatch Pro 3 makes Wear OS feel smooth with decent battery life, but its rough finishing and missing ECG hold it back.
notebookcheck.biz
28/02/2021
Not graded yet
tweakers.net
28/05/2021
Not graded yet
notebookcheck.nl
27/10/2020
Not graded yet
8.0
notebookcheck.nl
≈ estimated
28/02/2021
Lab test · Cellular Wear OS
Verdict
Mobvoi TicWatch Pro 3 LTE is one of the best-equipped Wear OS watches, with a built-in SIM, GPS and health tracking, though its menus take some learning.

Third-party reviews

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Mobvoi Ticwatch Pro 3

  • Innovative dual-layer display (AMOLED + FSTN) for better outdoor visibility and power saving
  • Exceptional battery life compared to other Wear OS devices, lasting 2–3 days in smart mode
  • Snappy performance due to the Snapdragon Wear 4100 chipset and 1GB RAM
  • Lightweight and comfortable design despite its large case size
  • Comprehensive health sensor suite including SpO2 and 24-hour heart rate monitoring

What we don't like about Mobvoi Ticwatch Pro 3

  • Poor software support with significantly delayed or buggy Wear OS 3 updates
  • Weak and barely noticeable haptic vibration motor for notifications
  • Inconsistent accuracy in fitness and sleep tracking compared to dedicated sports watches
  • Proprietary magnetic charging cable is described as flimsy and slow
  • Lack of a physical rotating crown for easier menu navigation
  • Questionable long-term water resistance, with some users reporting failures after swimming

Verdict

The Mobvoi TicWatch Pro 3 is a high-performance Wear OS smartwatch powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 4100 platform with 1GB of RAM and 8GB of internal storage. Its standout characteristic is the Dual Display 2.0 technology, which layers a low-power FSTN screen over a vibrant 1.4-inch AMOLED display (454x454 resolution) to significantly extend battery life. Main pros include its exceptional stamina, lasting up to 72 hours in Smart Mode and 45 days in Essential Mode, alongside comprehensive health tracking for SpO2, heart rate, and sleep, all housed in a lightweight 41.9g stainless steel and plastic frame. However, notable cons include weak haptic vibration alerts, a bulky 47mm design that may not suit smaller wrists, the lack of a rotating crown for navigation, and reports of inconsistent heart rate accuracy during high-intensity weightlifting.

Compare Mobvoi Ticwatch Pro 3 with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Mobvoi Ticwatch Pro 3 and other Smartwatches

No results found