OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Smartwatches Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 3,488 independent expert reviews and 5,192 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v2.0

Mobvoi Ticwatch Pro 3 Ultra GPS Review | 126 Data compared

Avg. price:~£110Screen size:1.40 inchBattery life:3 daysDisplay type:AMOLED

Mobvoi Ticwatch Pro 3 Ultra GPS Review: Compare 126 technical specifications and 22 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

7.8

Overall score

Score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartwatch's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartwatches on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 81% of models
Score components

70%

7.7

Technical score

30%

7.9

Review score ( 10 · 12)

Review score 30% · 7.9 · based on 22 independent reviews
Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 30%, technical score 70%. This model has enough reviews, so its review score is the weighted average of their grades. 22 more reviews are not scored yet.
â–²Better than 81% of smartwatches
7.7

Technical score

Technical score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 80% of models
Score components

24%

7.1

Health

21%

10

Fitness

16%

5.2

Battery

14%

8.6

Smart features

12%

8.2

Connectivity

9%

7.3

Display & Design

4%

6.7

Hardware

â–²Better than 80% of smartwatches
7.9

Review score

Review score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 63% of models
Grades by review (22)
10 reviews: 4 with a printed score, 6 estimated from the review. 12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 6
✓ explicit
4

7.7%

7.0

tomsguide.com

6.2%

8.2

en.techreviewer.de

6.2%

7.0

androidauthority.com

6.2%

7.0

connectthewatts.com

≈ estimated
2

6.2%

9.0

jessicabryson.com

6.2%

7.0

the-gadgeteer.com

Video reviews 3

3.1%

9.0

Dave West Media

3.1%

9.0

Raymond Strazdas

3.1%

8.0

Ryan-Thomas

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
â–²Better than 63% of smartwatches
  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £110

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Mobvoi Ticwatch Pro 3 Ultra GPS

Technical score
Technical score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 80% of models
Score components:

24%

7.1

Health

21%

10

Fitness

16%

5.2

Battery

14%

8.6

Smart features

12%

8.2

Connectivity

9%

7.3

Display & Design

4%

6.7

Hardware

7.7
Review score
Review score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 63% of models
Grades by review (22)
10 reviews: 4 with a printed score, 6 estimated from the review. 12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 6
✓ explicit
4

7.7%

7.0

tomsguide.com

6.2%

8.2

en.techreviewer.de

6.2%

7.0

androidauthority.com

6.2%

7.0

connectthewatts.com

≈ estimated
2

6.2%

9.0

jessicabryson.com

6.2%

7.0

the-gadgeteer.com

Video reviews 3

3.1%

9.0

Dave West Media

3.1%

9.0

Raymond Strazdas

3.1%

8.0

Ryan-Thomas

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
7.9
Popularity
Popularity
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartwatch.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 73% of models
Popularity:
Mobvoi Ticwatch Pro 3 Ultra GPS has a popularity of 8.2 points, which is higher than 72.6% of smartwatches.
8.2
Value for money
Value for money
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 86% of models
Score components:

60%

7.8

Overall score

40%

9.9

Price

8.4
Brand name
Mobvoi
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
â–² Better than 11% of models
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 10.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
â–² Better than 33% of models
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 33.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
ECG
no
â–¼ Worse than 17% of models
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
â–² Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings. 51.9% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
Accelerometer
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.6% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
yes
Barometer
yes
â–² Better than 51% of models
This smartwatch includes a barometer. 50.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
Gyroscope
yes
â–² Better than 30% of models
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 30.2% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
yes
Cadence sensor
yes
â–² Better than 69% of models
This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor. 69% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
Distance tracking
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 4.1% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery life
3 days
Battery life
3 days
â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch offers a battery life of 3 days which is shorter than that of 74.8% of smartwatches and equal to that of 3.9% of smartwatches.
Up to 45 days in "essential mode.
Battery life in training mode
20 h
Battery life in training mode
20 h
â–² Better than 51% of models
Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
This smartwatch lasts 20 h in training mode which is longer than 50.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 3.6% of smartwatches.
Battery life with GPS on
20 h
Battery life with GPS on
20 h
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
This smartwatch lasts 20 h with GPS on which is longer than 46.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 5.6% of smartwatches.
Battery power
577 mAh
Battery power
577 mAh
★ Better than 98% of models
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a battery capacity of 577 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 97.9% of smartwatches.
Charge time
90 min
Charge time
90 min
â–² Better than 64% of models
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges in 90 min which is faster than 63.7% of smartwatches and equal to the charge time of 9.9% of smartwatches.
Normalized from hour-based sources to 90 minutes.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Wear OS
Operating system
Wear OS
â–² Better than 79% of models
This smartwatch runs Wear OS which is more advanced than the operating system in 79% of smartwatches and the same as that in 16.6% of smartwatches.
OS detail: Wear OS (3).
Software update frequency
ended
Software update frequency
ended
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
This smartwatch has ended software update support which is less active than that of 42.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 57.5% of smartwatches.
Third-party app support
yes
Third-party app support
yes
â–² Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports third-party apps. 52.4% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
Voice assistant support
yes
â–² Better than 32% of models
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 32.4% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
Cellular module
no
â–¼ Worse than 18% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 18% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
â–² Better than 44% of models
This smartwatch supports GPS. 43.9% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
yes
Galileo support
yes
â–² Better than 62% of models
This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation. 61.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Compass
yes
Compass
yes
â–² Better than 47% of models
This smartwatch includes a compass. 47.5% of smartwatches include a compass.
Show more
Screen size
1.4 inch
Screen size
1.4 inch
â–² Better than 49% of models
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
This smartwatch has a screen size of 1.4 inch which is larger than the screens of 48.8% of smartwatches and equal to those of 6.7% of smartwatches.
Display type
AMOLED
Display type
AMOLED
â–² Better than 50% of models
This smartwatch uses a AMOLED display type which is more advanced than that of 49.9% of smartwatches and the same as that of 50.1% of smartwatches.
Resolution
454x 454
Resolution
454x 454
â–² Better than 80% of models
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 454x454 which is higher than that of 79.9% of smartwatches and equal to that of 6.7% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
459 ppi
Pixel density
459 ppi
â–² Better than 78% of models
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 459 ppi which is higher than that of 78.1% of smartwatches and equal to that of 1% of smartwatches.
Display brightness
500 nits
Display brightness
500 nits
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
This smartwatch reaches 500 nits of display brightness, which is lower than that of 70% of smartwatches and equal to that of 15.6% of smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
4x 1.7 GHz
CPU speed
4x 1.7 GHz
★ Better than 91% of models
This smartwatch uses a CPU configuration of 4x1.7 GHz which is faster than that in 90.8% of smartwatches and equal to that in 8% of smartwatches.
Processor model
Snapdragon Wear 4100
Processor model
Snapdragon Wear 4100
â–² Better than 73% of models
This smartwatch uses the Snapdragon Wear 4100 processor model.
RAM
1 GB
RAM
1 GB
â–² Better than 31% of models
Market range: <0.5 GB – >2 GB
This smartwatch has 1 GB of RAM which is larger than the RAM in 31.3% of smartwatches and equal to that of 45.8% of smartwatches.
Internal storage
8 GB
Internal storage
8 GB
â–² Better than 68% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch uses 8 GB for internal storage which is larger than that of 67.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 12.1% of smartwatches.
External memory slot
no
External memory slot
no
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Mobvoi Ticwatch Pro 3 Ultra GPS vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • More advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Wear OS
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Wear OS vs Proprietary OS).
    OS detail: Wear OS (3).
    Wear OS vs Proprietary OS
  • Readiness score
    Readiness score
    yes
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    This smartwatch supports readiness scores, the average smartwatch does not. 17.5% of smartwatches support readiness scores.
  • Fall detection
    Fall detection
    yes
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    This smartwatch supports fall detection, the average smartwatch does not. 21.3% of smartwatches support fall detection.
  • HRV tracking
    HRV tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 40.8% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • Maps support
    Maps support
    yes
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 31.5% of smartwatches support maps.
    Maps via Google Maps app.
  • VO2 max measurement
    VO2 max measurement
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch measures VO2 max, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • Emergency SOS
    Emergency SOS
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch includes Emergency SOS, the average smartwatch does not. 42.8% of smartwatches include Emergency SOS.
  • NFC functionality
    NFC
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 43.4% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • 12.3% better value for money
    GPS
    8.44
    â–² Better than 44% of models
    This smartwatch has a higher value-for-money score than the average smartwatch (8.44 vs 7.5).
    8.44 vs 7.52
  • Readiness score
    Readiness score
    yes
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    This smartwatch supports readiness scores, the average smartwatch does not. 17.5% of smartwatches support readiness scores.
  • HRV tracking
    HRV tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 40.8% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • VO2 max measurement
    VO2 max measurement
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch measures VO2 max, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • Irregular heart rate alerts
    Irregular heart rate warnings
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does not. 48.1% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • Weight tracking
    Weight tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This smartwatch supports weight tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 39.1% of smartwatches support weight tracking.
  • External heart rate monitor support
    External heart rate monitor compatibility
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports external heart rate monitor compatibility, the average smartwatch does not. 42.7% of smartwatches support external heart rate monitor compatibility.
    Compatible through third-party apps/workarounds.
  • Barometer sensor included
    Barometer
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This smartwatch includes a barometer, the average smartwatch does not. 49.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • Cadence tracking
    Cadence sensor
    yes
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 31.1% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
  • Route support
    Route support
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch supports route support, the average smartwatch does not. 50% of smartwatches support route support.
    Route support available via companion app.
  • 20 more exercise profiles
    Multi-sport mode
    100
    â–² Better than 32% of models
    This smartwatch supports more exercise modes than the average smartwatch (100 vs 80). The average smartwatch supports 80 exercise modes.
    Reported as at least 100 exercise modes.
    100 vs 80
  • 277 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery life with GPS on
    577 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
    Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
    This smartwatch has a larger battery capacity than the average smartwatch (577 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    577 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • 30 min shorter charge time
    Charge time
    90 min
    â–² Better than 64% of models
    Market range: <60 min – >150 min
    This smartwatch charges faster than the average smartwatch (90 min vs 120 min). The average smartwatch charges in 120 min.
    Normalized from hour-based sources to 90 minutes.
    90 min vs 120 min
  • Maps support
    Maps support
    yes
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 31.5% of smartwatches support maps.
    Maps via Google Maps app.
  • NFC functionality
    NFC
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 43.4% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    Wi-Fi support
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.3% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • Galileo satellite support
    Galileo support
    yes
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation, the average smartwatch does not. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
  • Rugged construction
    Rugged design
    yes
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This smartwatch has a rugged design, the average smartwatch does not. 37.9% of smartwatches have a rugged design.
    Rugged design supported by MIL-STD/military-grade durability claim.
  • Stronger display glass
    Display glass type
    Corning Gorilla Glass
    â–² Better than 46% of models
    This smartwatch uses Corning Gorilla Glass display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass vs mineral glass
  • 133 ppi higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    459 ppi
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
    This smartwatch has a higher pixel density than the average smartwatch (459 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch display reaches 326 ppi.
    459 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • Higher resolution
    Display type
    454 x 454
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 454x454, while the average smartwatch reaches 352x430.
    454x454 vs 352x430
  • Better case material
    Case material
    stainless steel
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    This smartwatch uses stainless steel for the case material, while the average smartwatch uses polycarbonate.
    stainless steel vs polycarbonate
  • 10 °C higher max temperature
    Maximum operating temperature
    55.0 °C
    â–² Better than 81% of models
    Market range: <35 °C – >60 °C
    This smartwatch handles a higher maximum operating temperature than the average smartwatch (55 °C vs 45 °C). The average smartwatch reaches 45.0 °C.
    55.0 °C vs 45.0 °C
  • More advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Wear OS
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Wear OS vs Proprietary OS).
    OS detail: Wear OS (3).
    Wear OS vs Proprietary OS
  • Fall detection
    Fall detection
    yes
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    This smartwatch supports fall detection, the average smartwatch does not. 21.3% of smartwatches support fall detection.
  • Emergency SOS
    Emergency SOS
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch includes Emergency SOS, the average smartwatch does not. 42.8% of smartwatches include Emergency SOS.
  • Third-party app support
    Third-party app support
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports third-party apps, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • Faster CPU speed
    CPU speed
    4 x 1.7 GHz
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    This smartwatch uses a CPU configuration of 4x1.7 GHz, while the average smartwatch uses 1 GHz.
    4x1.7 GHz vs 1 GHz
  • More advanced processor model
    Processor model
    Snapdragon Wear 4100
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This smartwatch uses the Snapdragon Wear 4100 processor model, while the average smartwatch uses Silicon Labs EFM32 Giant Gecko.
    Snapdragon Wear 4,100 vs Silicon Labs EFM32 Giant Gecko
  • 48.5 m lower water resistance depth
    Waterproof depth rating
    1.5 m
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <1 m – >50 m
    This smartwatch has a shallower waterproof rating than the average smartwatch (1.5 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch reaches 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1.5 m vs 50 m
  • 4 days day/s shorter battery life
    Battery life with GPS on
    3 days h
    â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
    Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
    This smartwatch offers 3 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    Up to 45 days in "essential mode.
    3 days vs 7 days
  • 100 nits lower display brightness
    Display brightness
    500 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
    This smartwatch has lower display brightness than the average smartwatch (500 nits vs 600 nits). The average smartwatch reaches 600 nits.
    500 nits vs 600 nits
  • 0.7 mm thicker watch body
    Thickness
    12.30 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    Market range: <9.8 mm – >14.1 mm
    This smartwatch is thicker than the average smartwatch (12.3 mm vs 11.6 mm). The average smartwatch thickness is 11.6 mm.
    12.30 mm vs 11.6 mm
  • 5 mm wider watch width
    Width
    47.0 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <34.6 mm – >46.8 mm
    This smartwatch is wider than the average smartwatch (47 mm vs 42 mm). The average smartwatch width is 42.0 mm.
    47.0 mm vs 42.0 mm
  • 3 mm taller watch height
    Height
    48.0 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
    Market range: <39.5 mm – >51 mm
    This smartwatch is taller than the average smartwatch (48 mm vs 45 mm). The average smartwatch height is 45 mm.
    48.0 mm vs 45 mm
  • Basic band material
    Band material
    silicone, rubber
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    This smartwatch uses silicone, rubber for the band material, while the average smartwatch uses silicone.
    silicone, rubber vs silicone
  • 4 days day/s shorter battery life
    Battery life with GPS on
    3 days h
    â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
    Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
    This smartwatch offers 3 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    Up to 45 days in "essential mode.
    3 days vs 7 days
  • 48.5 m lower water resistance depth
    Waterproof depth rating
    1.5 m
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <1 m – >50 m
    This smartwatch has a shallower waterproof rating than the average smartwatch (1.5 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch reaches 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1.5 m vs 50 m
  • 100 nits lower display brightness
    Display brightness
    500 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
    This smartwatch has lower display brightness than the average smartwatch (500 nits vs 600 nits). The average smartwatch reaches 600 nits.
    500 nits vs 600 nits
  • 0.7 mm thicker watch body
    Thickness
    12.30 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    Market range: <9.8 mm – >14.1 mm
    This smartwatch is thicker than the average smartwatch (12.3 mm vs 11.6 mm). The average smartwatch thickness is 11.6 mm.
    12.30 mm vs 11.6 mm
  • 5 mm wider watch width
    Width
    47.0 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <34.6 mm – >46.8 mm
    This smartwatch is wider than the average smartwatch (47 mm vs 42 mm). The average smartwatch width is 42.0 mm.
    47.0 mm vs 42.0 mm
  • 3 mm taller watch height
    Height
    48.0 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
    Market range: <39.5 mm – >51 mm
    This smartwatch is taller than the average smartwatch (48 mm vs 45 mm). The average smartwatch height is 45 mm.
    48.0 mm vs 45 mm
  • Basic band material
    Band material
    silicone, rubber
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    This smartwatch uses silicone, rubber for the band material, while the average smartwatch uses silicone.
    silicone, rubber vs silicone

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Dave West Media
≈ estimated
13/06/2022
Hands-on review · three weeks of daily use
Verdict
Mobvoi Ticwatch Pro 3 Ultra GPS is comfortable to wear and strongly recommended for anyone who likes this style.
8.0
Ryan-Thomas
≈ estimated
26/05/2022
Hands-on review · design, GPS and everyday use
Verdict
Mobvoi Ticwatch Pro 3 Ultra GPS is a good pick for Android users, though it is expensive and a bit clunky in places.
9.0
Raymond Strazdas
≈ estimated
14/02/2022
Long-term test · one month of daily use
Verdict
Mobvoi Ticwatch Pro 3 Ultra GPS is a high-end watch with one of the best Wear OS experiences, held back by an older OS.
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

What reviewers agree on

Based on 10 · 12

Reviewers praise the dual display and sturdy build, while battery life divides opinion and the companion app draws widespread complaints.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

techadvisor.com
15/02/2022
Not graded yet
trustedreviews.com
22/11/2021
Not graded yet
t3.com
13/12/2021
Not graded yet
7.0
tomsguide.com
✓ explicit
06/04/2023
Hands-on review · Rugged fitness watch
Verdict
The Mobvoi TicWatch Pro 3 Ultra GPS is a sturdy, multi-day fitness watch with a bright always-on screen, though its software is still waiting for the Wear OS 3 update.
7.0
androidauthority.com
✓ explicit
25/08/2022
Hands-on review · Durable Wear OS watch
Verdict
The TicWatch Pro 3 Ultra is a tough watch with multi-day battery life, but it runs old software until Wear OS 3 arrives and sleep tracking is only average.
7.0
the-gadgeteer.com
≈ estimated
11/09/2022
Hands-on review · Everyday smartwatch
Verdict
The TicWatch Pro 3 Ultra is a comfortable smartwatch with good battery life, though it still needs regular charging and won't replace a mechanical watch.
8.2
en.techreviewer.de
✓ explicit
01/10/2024
Hands-on test · Wear OS watch
Verdict
The Mobvoi TicWatch Pro 3 Ultra GPS is a sturdy Wear OS watch with a sunlight-readable LCD, but its crowns cannot scroll, so you always need the touchscreen.
xda-developers.com
14/12/2021
Not graded yet
androidcentral.com
13/10/2021
Not graded yet
androidpolice.com
21/01/2022
Not graded yet
7.0
connectthewatts.com
✓ explicit
18/08/2022
Hands-on review · All-round fitness watch
Verdict
The Mobvoi TicWatch Pro 3 Ultra GPS is a solid all-rounder with a bright screen and three days of battery life, but no single feature stands out.
moz.de
14/12/2021
Not graded yet
notebookcheck.com
16/10/2021
Not graded yet
techreviewer.de
01/10/2024
Not graded yet
8.0
outdoor-magazin.com
≈ estimated
30/11/2023
Hands-on test · Rugged Wear OS watch
Verdict
The Mobvoi TicWatch Pro 3 Ultra GPS is a rugged watch with a good screen and many apps, but its battery drains fast under heavy GPS use.
lesnumeriques.com
03/07/2022
Not graded yet
notebookcheck.biz
21/10/2021
Not graded yet
6.0
i-trekkings.net
≈ estimated
21/03/2023
Field test · Outdoor sports watch
Verdict
The Mobvoi TicWatch Pro 3 Ultra GPS is a comfortable, well-made watch for everyday activity, but its slow satellite lock-on suits casual walkers more than serious outdoor users.
fr.techreviewer.de
01/10/2024
Not graded yet
profesionalreview.com
31/12/2021
Not graded yet

Third-party reviews

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Mobvoi Ticwatch Pro 3 Ultra GPS

  • Excellent battery life (up to 3-4 days in smart mode and 45 days in essential mode)
  • Unique dual-layer display (AMOLED and low-power FSTN screen)
  • Rugged and durable build quality with MIL-STD-810G and IP68 ratings
  • Smooth and fast performance powered by the Snapdragon Wear 4100
  • Comprehensive health tracking including AFib detection and fatigue assessment
  • Responsive touch screen that works even in bright sunlight

What we don't like about Mobvoi Ticwatch Pro 3 Ultra GPS

  • Slow and inconsistent GPS lock-on performance
  • Lacked Wear OS 3 at launch, leading to delayed software updates
  • Poor long-term software support and infrequent security updates
  • Proprietary magnetic charging cable instead of standard wireless charging
  • Large and bulky design may not fit smaller wrists comfortably
  • Weak haptic/vibration motor and lack of a functional rotating crown for scrolling

Verdict

The Mobvoi TicWatch Pro 3 Ultra GPS is a rugged smartwatch featuring a unique 1.4-inch dual-layer display (AMOLED and low-power FSTN) and MIL-STD-810G military-grade durability. It is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 4100 platform with a dual-processor system, 1GB of RAM, and 8GB of storage, running on Wear OS. Key characteristics include a 577mAh battery providing up to 72 hours in Smart Mode or 45 days in Essential Mode, built-in GPS, IP68 water resistance, and advanced health sensors for SpO2, heart rate, and fatigue assessment. Main pros are its exceptional battery life for a Wear OS device, smooth performance, and highly readable secondary display; however, cons include a bulky design for smaller wrists, occasional slow GPS signal locks, and a reliance on older software versions during its initial lifecycle.

Compare Mobvoi Ticwatch Pro 3 Ultra GPS with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Mobvoi Ticwatch Pro 3 Ultra GPS and other Smartwatches

No results found