OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Smartwatches Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 3,948 independent expert reviews and 5,024 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v2.0

Amazfit Active 2 Review | 126 Data compared

Avg. price:~£60Screen size:?Battery life:10 daysDisplay type:AMOLED

Amazfit Active 2 Review: Compare 126 technical specifications and 21 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

8.4

Overall score

Score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartwatch's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartwatches on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 94% of models
Score components

70%

8.2

Technical score

30%

8.6

Review score ( 9 · 12)

Review score 30% · 8.6 · based on 21 independent reviews
Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 30%, technical score 70%. This model has enough reviews, so its review score is the weighted average of their grades. 8 more reviews are not scored yet.
★Better than 94% of smartwatches
8.2

Technical score

Technical score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 91% of models
Score components

24%

8.7

Health

21%

10

Fitness

16%

5.7

Battery

14%

7.8

Smart features

12%

8.2

Connectivity

9%

8.8

Display & Design

4%

7.0

Hardware

★Better than 91% of smartwatches
8.6

Review score

Review score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 94% of models
Grades by review (21)
Text reviews 2
✓ explicit
2

8.3%

8.0

techadvisor.com

6.7%

9.0

telegraph.co.uk

Video reviews 3

1.7%

10

TechRadar

3.3%

9.5

Digital Adventures!

3.3%

8.0

The Product Reviewer

estimated from the review
9 reviews: 4 with a printed score, 5 estimated from the review. 12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
★Better than 94% of smartwatches
  • amazfit-active-2
  • amazfit-active-2
  • amazfit-active-2
  • amazfit-active-2
  • amazfit-active-2
  • amazfit-active-2
  • amazfit-active-2
  • amazfit-active-2
  • amazfit-active-2
amazfit-active-2
amazfit-active-2
amazfit-active-2
amazfit-active-2
amazfit-active-2
amazfit-active-2
amazfit-active-2
amazfit-active-2
amazfit-active-2

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Amazfit Active 2

Technical score
Technical score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 91% of models
Score components:

24%

8.7

Health

21%

10

Fitness

16%

5.7

Battery

14%

7.8

Smart features

12%

8.2

Connectivity

9%

8.8

Display & Design

4%

7.0

Hardware

8.2
Review score
Review score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 94% of models
Grades by review (21)
Text reviews 2
✓ explicit
2

8.3%

8.0

techadvisor.com

6.7%

9.0

telegraph.co.uk

Video reviews 3

1.7%

10

TechRadar

3.3%

9.5

Digital Adventures!

3.3%

8.0

The Product Reviewer

estimated from the review
9 reviews: 4 with a printed score, 5 estimated from the review. 12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
8.6
Value for money
Value for money
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 99% of models
Score components:

60%

8.4

Overall score

40%

10

Price

8.9
Brand name
Amazfit
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
â–² Better than 11% of models
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 10.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
â–² Better than 33% of models
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 33.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
?
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
â–² Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings. 51.9% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
Accelerometer
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.6% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
yes
Barometer
yes
â–² Better than 51% of models
This smartwatch includes a barometer. 50.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
Gyroscope
yes
â–² Better than 30% of models
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 30.2% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
yes
Cadence sensor
yes
â–² Better than 69% of models
This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor. 69% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
Distance tracking
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 4.1% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery life
10 days
Battery life
10 days
â–² Better than 63% of models
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch offers a battery life of 10 days which is longer than that of 63.3% of smartwatches and equal to that of 6.7% of smartwatches.
Battery life in training mode
21 h
Battery life in training mode
21 h
â–² Better than 54% of models
Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
This smartwatch lasts 21 h in training mode which is longer than 54.5% of smartwatches and equal to that of 1.9% of smartwatches.
Battery life with GPS on
21 h
Battery life with GPS on
21 h
â–² Better than 53% of models
Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
This smartwatch lasts 21 h with GPS on which is longer than 52.8% of smartwatches and equal to that of 3.4% of smartwatches.
Battery power
270 mAh
Battery power
270 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a battery capacity of 270 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 64.6% of smartwatches and equal to those in 0.7% of smartwatches.
Charge time
120 min
Charge time
120 min
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges in 120 min which is faster than 13.1% of smartwatches and equal to the charge time of 44.2% of smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Zepp OS
Operating system
Zepp OS
â–² Better than 60% of models
This smartwatch runs Zepp OS which is more advanced than the operating system in 60.2% of smartwatches and the same as that in 6.5% of smartwatches.
Software update frequency
occasional
Software update frequency
occasional
â–² Better than 58% of models
This smartwatch has occasional software update support which is more active than that of 57.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 36.2% of smartwatches.
Updates are typically released about every 3 months.
Third-party app support
yes
Third-party app support
yes
â–² Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports third-party apps. 52.4% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
Voice assistant support
yes
â–² Better than 32% of models
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 32.4% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
Cellular module
no
â–¼ Worse than 18% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 18% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
â–² Better than 44% of models
This smartwatch supports GPS. 43.9% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
yes
Galileo support
yes
â–² Better than 62% of models
This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation. 61.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Compass
yes
Compass
yes
â–² Better than 47% of models
This smartwatch includes a compass. 47.5% of smartwatches include a compass.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen size
?
Display type
AMOLED
Display type
AMOLED
â–² Better than 50% of models
This smartwatch uses a AMOLED display type which is more advanced than that of 49.9% of smartwatches and the same as that of 50.1% of smartwatches.
Resolution
390x 450
Resolution
390x 450
â–² Better than 67% of models
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 390x450 which is higher than that of 67.1% of smartwatches and equal to that of 1.9% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
?
Display brightness
2000 nits
Display brightness
2000 nits
â–² Better than 89% of models
Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
This smartwatch reaches 2000 nits of display brightness, which is higher than that of 88.8% of smartwatches and equal to that of 5.9% of smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
?
Processor model
Snapdragon W5 Gen 2
Processor model
Snapdragon W5 Gen 2
â–² Better than 87% of models
This smartwatch uses the Snapdragon W5 Gen 2 processor model.
RAM
?
Internal storage
0.5 GB
Internal storage
0.5 GB
â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch uses 0.5 GB for internal storage which is smaller than that of 63.8% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.8% of smartwatches.
512 MB total; about 150 MB available to the user.
External memory slot
no
External memory slot
no
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Amazfit Active 2 vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • Temperature sensing
    Temperature sensor
    yes
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This smartwatch includes a temperature sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 26.8% of smartwatches include a temperature sensor.
  • Readiness score
    Readiness score
    yes
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    This smartwatch supports readiness scores, the average smartwatch does not. 17.5% of smartwatches support readiness scores.
  • HRV tracking
    HRV tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 40.8% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • Stronger display glass
    Display glass type
    sapphire
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    This smartwatch uses sapphire display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    sapphire vs mineral glass
  • Maps support
    Maps support
    yes
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 31.5% of smartwatches support maps.
  • VO2 max measurement
    VO2 max measurement
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch measures VO2 max, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • NFC functionality
    NFC
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 43.4% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • 1,400 nits higher display brightness
    Display brightness
    2000 nits
    â–² Better than 89% of models
    Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
    This smartwatch has higher display brightness than the average smartwatch (2000 nits vs 600 nits). The average smartwatch reaches 600 nits.
    2,000 nits vs 600 nits
  • 17.8% better value for money
    Amazfit Active 2 has a higher value-for-money score than the average smartwatch (8.86 vs 7.5).
    8.86 vs 7.52
  • 63.4% more popular
    Amazfit Active 2 has a higher popularity than the average smartwatch (10 vs 6.1).
    10 vs 6.12
  • Temperature sensing
    Temperature sensor
    yes
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This smartwatch includes a temperature sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 26.8% of smartwatches include a temperature sensor.
  • Readiness score
    Readiness score
    yes
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    This smartwatch supports readiness scores, the average smartwatch does not. 17.5% of smartwatches support readiness scores.
  • HRV tracking
    HRV tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 40.8% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • VO2 max measurement
    VO2 max measurement
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch measures VO2 max, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • Irregular heart rate alerts
    Irregular heart rate warnings
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does not. 48.1% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • Calorie tracking
    Calorie tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.6% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
    Food logging may require a companion or third-party app.
  • Weight tracking
    Weight tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This smartwatch supports weight tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 39.1% of smartwatches support weight tracking.
    Tracked through the companion app or smart-scale sync.
  • External heart rate monitor support
    External heart rate monitor compatibility
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports external heart rate monitor compatibility, the average smartwatch does not. 42.7% of smartwatches support external heart rate monitor compatibility.
  • Barometer sensor included
    Barometer
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This smartwatch includes a barometer, the average smartwatch does not. 49.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • Cadence tracking
    Cadence sensor
    yes
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 31.1% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
  • 80 more exercise profiles
    Multi-sport mode
    160
    â–² Better than 32% of models
    This smartwatch supports more exercise modes than the average smartwatch (160 vs 80). The average smartwatch supports 80 exercise modes.
    Reported as at least 160 exercise modes.
    160 vs 80
  • Route support
    Route support
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch supports route support, the average smartwatch does not. 50% of smartwatches support route support.
    Route support available via companion app.
  • 3 days day/s longer battery life
    Battery life
    10 days
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 10 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    10 days vs 7 days
  • Maps support
    Maps support
    yes
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 31.5% of smartwatches support maps.
  • NFC functionality
    NFC
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 43.4% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    Wi-Fi support
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.3% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • Galileo satellite support
    Galileo support
    yes
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation, the average smartwatch does not. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.2
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This smartwatch supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average smartwatch (5.2 vs 5). The average smartwatch uses 5.0.
    5.2 vs 5.0
  • Stronger display glass
    Display glass type
    sapphire
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    This smartwatch uses sapphire display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    sapphire vs mineral glass
  • 1,400 nits higher display brightness
    Display brightness
    2000 nits
    â–² Better than 89% of models
    Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
    This smartwatch has higher display brightness than the average smartwatch (2000 nits vs 600 nits). The average smartwatch reaches 600 nits.
    2,000 nits vs 600 nits
  • 15.5 g lighter weight
    Weight
    29.5 g
    â–² Better than 89% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is lighter than the average smartwatch (29.5 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    Weight refers to watch case without strap/band.
    29.5 g vs 45.0 g
  • 1.7 mm thinner watch body
    Thickness
    9.90 mm
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    Market range: <9.8 mm – >14.1 mm
    This smartwatch is thinner than the average smartwatch (9.9 mm vs 11.6 mm). The average smartwatch thickness is 11.6 mm.
    9.90 mm vs 11.6 mm
  • Better band material
    Band material
    silicone, leather
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch uses silicone, leather for the band material, while the average smartwatch uses silicone.
    silicone, leather vs silicone
  • 2 mm narrower band
    Width of band
    20.0 mm
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    Market range: <20 mm – >22 mm
    This smartwatch has a narrower band width than the average smartwatch (20 mm vs 22 mm). The average smartwatch band is 22.0 mm wide.
    20.0 mm vs 22.0 mm
  • Better case material
    Case material
    stainless steel, fiber-reinforced polymer
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    This smartwatch uses stainless steel, fiber-reinforced polymer for the case material, while the average smartwatch uses polycarbonate.
    stainless steel, fiber-reinforced polymer vs polycarbonate
  • Third-party app support
    Third-party app support
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports third-party apps, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • More frequent updates
    Software update frequency
    occasional
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    This smartwatch receives occasional software updates, while the average smartwatch receives ended updates.
    Updates are typically released about every 3 months.
    occasional vs ended
  • More advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Zepp OS
    â–² Better than 60% of models
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Zepp OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Zepp OS vs Proprietary OS
  • 4 year/s newer release date
    Release date
    2025
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This smartwatch has a newer release date than the average smartwatch (2025 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    January 2025
    2025 vs 2021
  • More advanced processor model
    Processor model
    Snapdragon W5 Gen 2
    â–² Better than 87% of models
    This smartwatch uses the Snapdragon W5 Gen 2 processor model, while the average smartwatch uses Silicon Labs EFM32 Giant Gecko.
    Snapdragon W5 Gen 2 vs Silicon Labs EFM32 Giant Gecko
  • No smart alarm
    Smart alarm
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 52.7% of smartwatches support smart alarms.
  • 30 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery life
    270 mAh days
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartwatch (270 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    270 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • 3.5 GB less storage
    Internal storage
    0.5 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
    This smartwatch offers less internal storage than the average smartwatch (0.5 GB vs 4 GB). The average smartwatch provides 4 GB of storage.
    512 MB total; about 150 MB available to the user.
    0.5 GB vs 4 GB
  • 30 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery life
    270 mAh days
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartwatch (270 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    270 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • No smart alarm
    Smart alarm
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 52.7% of smartwatches support smart alarms.
  • 3.5 GB less storage
    Internal storage
    0.5 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
    This smartwatch offers less internal storage than the average smartwatch (0.5 GB vs 4 GB). The average smartwatch provides 4 GB of storage.
    512 MB total; about 150 MB available to the user.
    0.5 GB vs 4 GB

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.5
Digital Adventures!
≈ estimated
19/12/2025
Value review · display, battery and software update
Verdict
Amazfit Active 2 is the best value smartwatch right now, with a sharp display, long battery life and a strong feature set.
8.0
The Product Reviewer
≈ estimated
08/03/2025
Feature walkthrough · GPS and health tests
Verdict
Amazfit Active 2 is a good budget watch with strong GPS and plenty of health features, though it misses daytime sleep.
10
TechRadar
✓ explicit
14/06/2025
Hands-on review · fitness tracking and performance tests
Verdict
Amazfit Active 2 is the best cheap smartwatch available, with strong fitness features and responsive performance.
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

What reviewers agree on

Based on 11 · 12

Reviewers enjoy the sports modes, display and comfortable design, but connectivity and music support fall short; battery life divides opinion.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

9.0
telegraph.co.uk
✓ explicit
09/12/2025
Hands-on test · Fitness watch
Verdict
The Amazfit Active 2 is a light, feature-packed fitness watch for everyday use, though without dual-frequency GPS it suits casual exercisers more than serious athletes.
8.0
techadvisor.com
✓ explicit
09/12/2025
Long-term test · Fitness watch
Verdict
The Amazfit Active 2 is a capable all-round watch with offline maps, Oura Ring-level sleep tracking and long battery life, though its heart-rate accuracy and standard glass fall short.
7.4
chip.de
✓ explicit
05/03/2026
Lab test · Sports and battery
Verdict
The Amazfit Active 2 Square is a compact smartwatch with a bright screen, long battery life and many sports modes, but it skips cellular, ECG and fall detection.
8.0
stadt-bremerhaven.de
≈ estimated
16/08/2025
Hands-on test · Round vs square
Verdict
The Amazfit Active 2 suits occasional athletes, with 5 to 10 days of battery and sapphire glass on the premium model, but its GPS can underestimate distance.
9.0
tech-bauer.de
✓ explicit
08/02/2026
Two-month test · Battery and wear
Verdict
The Amazfit Active 2 lasts about a week per charge and suits daily wear and sleep tracking, but its GPS is less precise and iPhone replies often fail.
heise.de
31/03/2025
Not graded yet
notebookcheck.com
30/05/2025
Not graded yet
9.0
blog.tuproducto.es
≈ estimated
17/08/2026
Six-week test · Battery and GPS
Verdict
The Amazfit Active 2 is a sports watch with 8 to 9 days of battery and accurate GPS but has no NFC or speaker and an unpolished Zepp app.
9.0
stradisti.it
≈ estimated
22/11/2025
Running test · Entry-level watch
Verdict
The Amazfit Active 2 is a light running watch with accurate GPS and a week-plus battery, suiting regular runners, though its Zepp app and voice control are less polished.
8.0
ceotech.it
≈ estimated
01/09/2025
Month-long test · Sports watch
Verdict
The Amazfit Active 2 Round is a light, sporty watch whose bright screen and week-long battery suit everyday fitness, though its standard strap and glass are weaker.
4actionsport.it
15/03/2025
Not graded yet
9.5
notebookcheck.nl
≈ estimated
11/08/2025
Hands-on test · Health tracking
Verdict
The Amazfit Active 2 has a bright screen and detailed sleep and heart data, but its voice assistant is slow to respond.
nozie.net
22/04/2025
Not graded yet
consumentenbond.nl
01/04/2025
Not graded yet

Third-party reviews

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Amazfit Active 2

  • Excellent value for money, often cited as 'best bang-for-the-buck'.
  • Premium and stylish design with a high-quality AMOLED display reaching 2,000 nits.
  • Strong battery life, typically lasting 5 to 10 days depending on usage.
  • Extensive feature set for the price, including offline mapping and 160+ sports modes.
  • Lightweight and comfortable for 24/7 wear and sleep tracking.
  • Useful smart features such as on-wrist Bluetooth calling and responsive voice assistant.

What we don't like about Amazfit Active 2

  • Software can be clunky, with reports of a janky UI and occasional bugs.
  • Limited onboard storage (approx. 150MB-512MB), making map and music management difficult.
  • Sensor accuracy issues, particularly with elevation data and inconsistent heart rate tracking during high-intensity intervals.
  • Navigation and mapping features are sometimes described as unpolished or cumbersome.
  • Occasional upselling or promotional content within the Zepp companion app.
  • Touchscreen can be unresponsive when fingers are sweaty or during intense workouts.

Verdict

The Amazfit Active 2 is a budget-friendly smartwatch featuring a vibrant 1.32-inch AMOLED display with a peak brightness of 2,000 nits, housed in a 44mm stainless steel frame. It offers comprehensive fitness tracking with over 160 sports modes, 5 ATM water resistance, and advanced tools like offline maps and AI-powered voice assistance via Zepp Flow. Key advantages include its lightweight design, impressive 10-day typical battery life (extending to 19 days in saver mode), and the inclusion of premium features like a speaker and microphone for Bluetooth calls at an affordable price point. However, users may find the health metric accuracy—particularly for heart rate and stress—to be less precise than high-end rivals, and the standard model lack of NFC payments and sapphire glass requires an upgrade to the Premium edition.

Compare Amazfit Active 2 with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Amazfit Active 2 and other Smartwatches

No results found