OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Smartwatches Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 3,488 independent expert reviews and 5,192 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v2.0

Xiaomi Watch 2 Review | 126 Data compared

Avg. price:~£110Screen size:1.43 inchBattery life:2 daysDisplay type:AMOLED

Xiaomi Watch 2 Review: Compare 126 technical specifications and 22 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

7.7

Overall score

Score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartwatch's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartwatches on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 79% of models
Score components

70%

7.6

Technical score

30%

8.0

Review score ( 10 · 12)

Review score 30% · 8.0 · based on 22 independent reviews
Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 30%, technical score 70%. This model has enough reviews, so its review score is the weighted average of their grades. 12 more reviews are not scored yet.
▲Better than 79% of smartwatches
7.6

Technical score

Technical score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 78% of models
Score components

24%

6.5

Health

21%

9.2

Fitness

16%

5.8

Battery

14%

8.9

Smart features

12%

7.6

Connectivity

9%

7.4

Display & Design

4%

8.8

Hardware

▲Better than 78% of smartwatches
8.0

Review score

Review score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 65% of models
Grades by review (22)
10 reviews: 7 with a printed score, 3 estimated from the review. 12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 4
✓ explicit
2

7.5%

8.0

techadvisor.com

6%

6.0

livescience.com

≈ estimated
2

6%

9.0

idzan.hr

6%

8.0

wareable.com

Video reviews 3

3%

9.0

Chigz Tech Reviews

3%

8.0

Team VRY

3%

4.0

LL Techview

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
▲Better than 65% of smartwatches
  • xiaomi-watch-2
  • xiaomi-watch-2
  • xiaomi-watch-2
  • xiaomi-watch-2
  • xiaomi-watch-2
  • xiaomi-watch-2
xiaomi-watch-2
xiaomi-watch-2
xiaomi-watch-2
xiaomi-watch-2
xiaomi-watch-2
xiaomi-watch-2

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Xiaomi Watch 2

Technical score
Technical score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 78% of models
Score components:

24%

6.5

Health

21%

9.2

Fitness

16%

5.8

Battery

14%

8.9

Smart features

12%

7.6

Connectivity

9%

7.4

Display & Design

4%

8.8

Hardware

7.6
Review score
Review score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 65% of models
Grades by review (22)
10 reviews: 7 with a printed score, 3 estimated from the review. 12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 4
✓ explicit
2

7.5%

8.0

techadvisor.com

6%

6.0

livescience.com

≈ estimated
2

6%

9.0

idzan.hr

6%

8.0

wareable.com

Video reviews 3

3%

9.0

Chigz Tech Reviews

3%

8.0

Team VRY

3%

4.0

LL Techview

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
8.0
Popularity
Popularity
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartwatch.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 65% of models
Popularity:
Xiaomi Watch 2 has a popularity of 7.6 points, which is higher than 65.4% of smartwatches.
7.6
Value for money
Value for money
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 86% of models
Score components:

60%

7.7

Overall score

40%

9.9

Price

8.4
Brand name
Xiaomi
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
▲ Better than 11% of models
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 10.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
▲ Better than 33% of models
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 33.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
ECG
no
▼ Worse than 17% of models
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
▲ Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings. 51.9% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
Supports abnormal high/low heart-rate alerts (typically after inactivity).
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
Accelerometer
yes
▲ Better than 1% of models
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.6% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
yes
Barometer
yes
▲ Better than 51% of models
This smartwatch includes a barometer. 50.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
Gyroscope
yes
▲ Better than 30% of models
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 30.2% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
no
Cadence sensor
no
▼ Worse than 31% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 31.2% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
Distance tracking
yes
▲ Better than 4% of models
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 4.1% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
Battery life
2 days
Battery life
2 days
▼ Worse than 80% of models
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch offers a battery life of 2 days which is shorter than that of 79.8% of smartwatches and equal to that of 4.6% of smartwatches.
Converted from the reported 65-hour battery life and aligned with the 1-3 day real-world figures.
Battery life in training mode
30 h
Battery life in training mode
30 h
▲ Better than 71% of models
Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
This smartwatch lasts 30 h in training mode which is longer than 71.4% of smartwatches and equal to that of 5.6% of smartwatches.
Battery life with GPS on
6 h
Battery life with GPS on
6 h
▼ Worse than 87% of models
Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
This smartwatch lasts 6 h with GPS on which is shorter than 87% of smartwatches and equal to that of 2.8% of smartwatches.
Battery power
398 mAh
Battery power
398 mAh
▲ Better than 75% of models
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a battery capacity of 398 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 74.7% of smartwatches and equal to those in 0.2% of smartwatches.
Charge time
50 min
Charge time
50 min
★ Better than 95% of models
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges in 50 min which is faster than 95.3% of smartwatches and equal to the charge time of 0.4% of smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Wear OS
Operating system
Wear OS
▲ Better than 79% of models
This smartwatch runs Wear OS which is more advanced than the operating system in 79% of smartwatches and the same as that in 16.6% of smartwatches.
OS detail: Wear OS (5).
Software update frequency
occasional
Software update frequency
occasional
▲ Better than 58% of models
This smartwatch has occasional software update support which is more active than that of 57.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 36.2% of smartwatches.
Updates are typically released about every 3 months.
Third-party app support
yes
Third-party app support
yes
▲ Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports third-party apps. 52.4% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
Voice assistant support
yes
▲ Better than 32% of models
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 32.4% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
Cellular module
no
▼ Worse than 18% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 18% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
1
SIM cards
1
▲ Better than 2% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This smartwatch uses 1 for cellular connectivity which is more advanced than that of 2% of smartwatches and the same as that of 98% of smartwatches.
eSIM
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
▲ Better than 44% of models
This smartwatch supports GPS. 43.9% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
yes
Galileo support
yes
▲ Better than 62% of models
This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation. 61.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Compass
yes
Compass
yes
▲ Better than 47% of models
This smartwatch includes a compass. 47.5% of smartwatches include a compass.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen size
1.43 inch
Screen size
1.43 inch
▲ Better than 56% of models
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
This smartwatch has a screen size of 1.43 inch which is larger than the screens of 56.3% of smartwatches and equal to those of 8.2% of smartwatches.
Display type
AMOLED
Display type
AMOLED
▲ Better than 50% of models
This smartwatch uses a AMOLED display type which is more advanced than that of 49.9% of smartwatches and the same as that of 50.1% of smartwatches.
Resolution
466x 466
Resolution
466x 466
▲ Better than 87% of models
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 466x466 which is higher than that of 87.4% of smartwatches and equal to that of 10.9% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
461 ppi
Pixel density
461 ppi
▲ Better than 84% of models
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 461 ppi which is higher than that of 84.5% of smartwatches and equal to that of 6.5% of smartwatches.
Display brightness
600 nits
Display brightness
600 nits
▼ Worse than 47% of models
Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
This smartwatch reaches 600 nits of display brightness, which is higher than that of 38.8% of smartwatches and equal to that of 14.1% of smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
?
Processor model
Snapdragon W5+ Gen 1
Processor model
Snapdragon W5+ Gen 1
▲ Better than 85% of models
This smartwatch uses the Snapdragon W5+ Gen 1 processor model.
RAM
2 GB
RAM
2 GB
▲ Better than 78% of models
Market range: <0.5 GB – >2 GB
This smartwatch has 2 GB of RAM which is larger than the RAM in 77.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 21.4% of smartwatches.
Internal storage
32 GB
Internal storage
32 GB
▲ Better than 85% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch uses 32 GB for internal storage which is larger than that of 84.7% of smartwatches and equal to that of 13.4% of smartwatches.
External memory slot
no
External memory slot
no
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more
What reviewers say

Xiaomi Watch 2 vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • 70 min shorter charge time
    Charge time
    50 min
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    Market range: <60 min – >150 min
    This smartwatch charges faster than the average smartwatch (50 min vs 120 min). The average smartwatch charges in 120 min.
    50 min vs 120 min
  • More advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Wear OS
    ▲ Better than 79% of models
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Wear OS vs Proprietary OS).
    OS detail: Wear OS (5).
    Wear OS vs Proprietary OS
  • Fall detection
    Fall detection
    yes
    ▲ Better than 79% of models
    This smartwatch supports fall detection, the average smartwatch does not. 21.3% of smartwatches support fall detection.
  • Maps support
    Maps support
    yes
    ▲ Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 31.5% of smartwatches support maps.
    Maps via Google Maps app.
  • VO2 max measurement
    VO2 max measurement
    yes
    ▲ Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch measures VO2 max, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • Emergency SOS
    Emergency SOS
    yes
    ▲ Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch includes Emergency SOS, the average smartwatch does not. 42.8% of smartwatches include Emergency SOS.
    paired phone / Mi Fitness setup required
  • Supports wireless charging
    Wireless charging
    yes
    ▲ Better than 76% of models
    This smartwatch supports wireless charging, the average smartwatch does not. 24.5% of smartwatches support wireless charging.
    Wireless charging supported via proprietary charging puck/dock.
  • NFC functionality
    NFC
    yes
    ▲ Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 43.4% of smartwatches support NFC.
    NFC hardware is present, but functionality may be limited by region/app support.
  • 11.4% better value for money
    Xiaomi Watch 2 has a higher value-for-money score than the average smartwatch (8.38 vs 7.5).
    8.38 vs 7.52
  • VO2 max measurement
    VO2 max measurement
    yes
    ▲ Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch measures VO2 max, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • Irregular heart rate alerts
    Irregular heart rate warnings
    yes
    ▲ Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does not. 48.1% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
    Supports abnormal high/low heart-rate alerts (typically after inactivity).
  • Weight tracking
    Weight tracking
    yes
    ▲ Better than 61% of models
    This smartwatch supports weight tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 39.1% of smartwatches support weight tracking.
    Tracked through the companion app or smart-scale sync.
  • Barometer sensor included
    Barometer
    yes
    ▲ Better than 51% of models
    This smartwatch includes a barometer, the average smartwatch does not. 49.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • 80 more exercise profiles
    Multi-sport mode
    160
    ▲ Better than 32% of models
    This smartwatch supports more exercise modes than the average smartwatch (160 vs 80). The average smartwatch supports 80 exercise modes.
    Reported as at least 160 exercise modes.
    160 vs 80
  • Route support
    Route support
    yes
    ▲ Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch supports route support, the average smartwatch does not. 50% of smartwatches support route support.
    Supports on-watch route navigation.
  • 70 min shorter charge time
    Charge time
    50 min
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    Market range: <60 min – >150 min
    This smartwatch charges faster than the average smartwatch (50 min vs 120 min). The average smartwatch charges in 120 min.
    50 min vs 120 min
  • Supports wireless charging
    Wireless charging
    yes
    ▲ Better than 76% of models
    This smartwatch supports wireless charging, the average smartwatch does not. 24.5% of smartwatches support wireless charging.
    Wireless charging supported via proprietary charging puck/dock.
  • 10.75 h longer training battery life
    Battery life in training mode
    30 h
    ▲ Better than 71% of models
    Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
    This smartwatch lasts longer in training mode than the average smartwatch (30 h vs 19.25 h). The average smartwatch lasts 19.25 h.
    30 h vs 19.25 h
  • 98 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery life
    398 mAh days
    ▼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch has a larger battery capacity than the average smartwatch (398 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    Converted from the reported 65-hour battery life and aligned with the 1-3 day real-world figures.
    398 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • Maps support
    Maps support
    yes
    ▲ Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 31.5% of smartwatches support maps.
    Maps via Google Maps app.
  • NFC functionality
    NFC
    yes
    ▲ Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 43.4% of smartwatches support NFC.
    NFC hardware is present, but functionality may be limited by region/app support.
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    Wi-Fi support
    yes
    ▲ Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.3% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • Galileo satellite support
    Galileo support
    yes
    ▲ Better than 62% of models
    This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation, the average smartwatch does not. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.2
    ▲ Better than 73% of models
    This smartwatch supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average smartwatch (5.2 vs 5). The average smartwatch uses 5.0.
    5.2 vs 5.0
  • Stronger display glass
    Display glass type
    Corning Gorilla Glass
    ▲ Better than 46% of models
    This smartwatch uses Corning Gorilla Glass display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass vs mineral glass
  • 135 ppi higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    461 ppi
    ▲ Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
    This smartwatch has a higher pixel density than the average smartwatch (461 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch display reaches 326 ppi.
    461 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • Higher resolution
    Display type
    466 x 466
    ▲ Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 466x466, while the average smartwatch reaches 352x430.
    466x466 vs 352x430
  • 8.2 g lighter weight
    Weight
    36.8 g
    ▲ Better than 70% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is lighter than the average smartwatch (36.8 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    Weight refers to watch case without strap/band.
    36.8 g vs 45.0 g
  • Better band material
    Band material
    tpu, leather
    ▲ Better than 64% of models
    This smartwatch uses tpu, leather for the band material, while the average smartwatch uses silicone.
    tpu, leather vs silicone
  • More advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Wear OS
    ▲ Better than 79% of models
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Wear OS vs Proprietary OS).
    OS detail: Wear OS (5).
    Wear OS vs Proprietary OS
  • Fall detection
    Fall detection
    yes
    ▲ Better than 79% of models
    This smartwatch supports fall detection, the average smartwatch does not. 21.3% of smartwatches support fall detection.
  • Emergency SOS
    Emergency SOS
    yes
    ▲ Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch includes Emergency SOS, the average smartwatch does not. 42.8% of smartwatches include Emergency SOS.
    paired phone / Mi Fitness setup required
  • Third-party app support
    Third-party app support
    yes
    ▲ Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports third-party apps, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • More frequent updates
    Software update frequency
    occasional
    ▲ Better than 58% of models
    This smartwatch receives occasional software updates, while the average smartwatch receives ended updates.
    Updates are typically released about every 3 months.
    occasional vs ended
  • 28 GB more storage
    Internal storage
    32 GB
    ▲ Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
    This smartwatch offers more internal storage than the average smartwatch (32 GB vs 4 GB). The average smartwatch provides 4 GB of storage.
    32 GB vs 4 GB
  • 1 GB more RAM
    RAM
    2 GB
    ▲ Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <0.5 GB – >2 GB
    This smartwatch has more RAM than the average smartwatch (2 GB vs 1 GB). The average smartwatch includes 1 GB of RAM.
    2 GB vs 1 GB
  • 3 year/s newer release date
    Release date
    2024
    ▲ Better than 88% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This smartwatch has a newer release date than the average smartwatch (2024 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    February 2024
    2024 vs 2021
  • More advanced processor model
    Processor model
    Snapdragon W5+ Gen 1
    ▲ Better than 85% of models
    This smartwatch uses the Snapdragon W5+ Gen 1 processor model, while the average smartwatch uses Silicon Labs EFM32 Giant Gecko.
    Snapdragon W5+ Gen 1 vs Silicon Labs EFM32 Giant Gecko
  • 14 h shorter GPS battery life
    Battery life with GPS on
    6 h
    ▼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
    This smartwatch lasts less with GPS on than the average smartwatch (6 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h.
    6 h vs 20 h
  • Lower IP rating
    IP rating
    IPX8
    ▼ Worse than 93% of models
    This smartwatch has a lower IP rating than the average smartwatch (IPX8 vs IP68).
    Also reported with 5 ATM water-resistance rating.
    IPX8 vs IP68
  • 5 days day/s shorter battery life
    Battery life
    2 days
    ▼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 2 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    Converted from the reported 65-hour battery life and aligned with the 1-3 day real-world figures.
    2 days vs 7 days
  • No iOS compatibility
    iOS compatibility
    no
    ▼ Worse than 95% of models
    This smartwatch offers less complete iOS compatibility than the average smartwatch (no vs yes).
  • 2.5 mm taller watch height
    Height
    47.5 mm
    ▼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <39.5 mm – >51 mm
    This smartwatch is taller than the average smartwatch (47.5 mm vs 45 mm). The average smartwatch height is 45 mm.
    47.5 mm vs 45 mm
  • 10 °C lower max temperature
    Maximum operating temperature
    35.0 °C
    ▼ Worse than 82% of models
    Market range: <35 °C – >60 °C
    This smartwatch handles a lower maximum operating temperature than the average smartwatch (35 °C vs 45 °C). The average smartwatch reaches 45.0 °C.
    35.0 °C vs 45.0 °C
  • 3.9 mm wider watch width
    Width
    45.9 mm
    ▼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <34.6 mm – >46.8 mm
    This smartwatch is wider than the average smartwatch (45.9 mm vs 42 mm). The average smartwatch width is 42.0 mm.
    45.9 mm vs 42.0 mm
  • 14 h shorter GPS battery life
    Battery life with GPS on
    6 h
    ▼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
    This smartwatch lasts less with GPS on than the average smartwatch (6 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h.
    6 h vs 20 h
  • 5 days day/s shorter battery life
    Battery life
    2 days
    ▼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 2 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    Converted from the reported 65-hour battery life and aligned with the 1-3 day real-world figures.
    2 days vs 7 days
  • No iOS compatibility
    iOS compatibility
    no
    ▼ Worse than 95% of models
    This smartwatch offers less complete iOS compatibility than the average smartwatch (no vs yes).
  • Lower IP rating
    IP rating
    IPX8
    ▼ Worse than 93% of models
    This smartwatch has a lower IP rating than the average smartwatch (IPX8 vs IP68).
    Also reported with 5 ATM water-resistance rating.
    IPX8 vs IP68
  • 2.5 mm taller watch height
    Height
    47.5 mm
    ▼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <39.5 mm – >51 mm
    This smartwatch is taller than the average smartwatch (47.5 mm vs 45 mm). The average smartwatch height is 45 mm.
    47.5 mm vs 45 mm
  • 3.9 mm wider watch width
    Width
    45.9 mm
    ▼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <34.6 mm – >46.8 mm
    This smartwatch is wider than the average smartwatch (45.9 mm vs 42 mm). The average smartwatch width is 42.0 mm.
    45.9 mm vs 42.0 mm
  • 10 °C lower max temperature
    Maximum operating temperature
    35.0 °C
    ▼ Worse than 82% of models
    Market range: <35 °C – >60 °C
    This smartwatch handles a lower maximum operating temperature than the average smartwatch (35 °C vs 45 °C). The average smartwatch reaches 45.0 °C.
    35.0 °C vs 45.0 °C

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
Team VRY
≈ estimated
02/05/2024
Short hands-on review · software, battery and heart rate
Verdict
Xiaomi Watch 2 is a fairly competent affordable Wear OS watch, held back by inconsistent heart rate readings.
4.0
LL Techview
≈ estimated
07/04/2024
Experience report · a couple of weeks of use
Verdict
Xiaomi Watch 2 is hard to recommend, with pairing problems, mediocre battery life and a rough Wear OS experience.
9.0
Chigz Tech Reviews
≈ estimated
02/03/2024
In-depth review · health sensors, battery and price
Verdict
Xiaomi Watch 2 is an excellent value for a Wear OS watch, but the screen glass protection is unclear and it lacks military-standard durability.
9.0
Team VRY
≈ estimated
29/02/2024
First look · unboxing and setup
Verdict
The Xiaomi Watch 2 is a good low-cost pick for buyers who want a Wear OS smartwatch.
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

What reviewers agree on

Based on 10 · 13

Reviewers praise the display and smooth performance, split on battery life and software, and fault the build quality and phone compatibility.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.0
wareable.com
≈ estimated
30/05/2024
Multi-week test · Wear OS watch
Verdict
The Xiaomi Watch 2 is a light, comfortable Wear OS watch with heart rate readings close to Garmin's, but its one-day battery holds it back.
racunalniske-novice.com
07/08/2024
Not graded yet
9.0
idzan.hr
≈ estimated
21/02/2025
One-month use · Wear OS upgrade
Verdict
The Xiaomi Watch 2 suits Android users who want Wear OS apps and custom faces, lasting about two days normally but closer to one under heavy use.
6.0
livescience.com
✓ explicit
27/03/2025
Hands-on test · Fitness tracking
Verdict
The Xiaomi Watch 2 suits smartwatch beginners who want accurate workout stats and a comfortable fit, but its short battery and clunky navigation let it down.
8.0
techadvisor.com
✓ explicit
01/05/2024
Hands-on test · Wear OS fitness
Verdict
The Xiaomi Watch 2 is a polished Wear OS watch with detailed swim tracking, but erratic heart rate readings and a one-day battery are hard to live with.
racunalniske-novice.com
07/08/2024
Not graded yet
futurezone.at
22/03/2024
Not graded yet
smartzone.de
29/03/2024
Not graded yet
8.6
chip.de
✓ explicit
31/05/2024
Lab test · Fitness and apps
Verdict
The Xiaomi Watch 2 is a bright, sharp smartwatch whose 160 workout types and fast charging suit active users, though its battery and large case are weak points.
8.0
pcwelt.de
✓ explicit
24/05/2024
Hands-on test · Sport and sleep
Verdict
The Xiaomi Watch 2 is a slim Wear OS watch with a clear display and detailed swim data, but shaky heart rate readings and weak battery life hold it back.
8.0
frandroid.com
✓ explicit
24/06/2025
Field test · GPS and heart rate
Verdict
The Xiaomi Watch 2 is a Wear OS watch with a two-day battery and decent GPS, but its heart rate tracking struggles during hard intervals.
lesnumeriques.com
14/03/2024
Not graded yet
phonandroid.com
12/03/2024
Not graded yet
01net.com
08/03/2024
Not graded yet
journaldugeek.com
23/04/2024
Not graded yet
tomsguide.fr
08/04/2024
Not graded yet
test-achats.be
Sans date
Not graded yet
7.0
racunalniske-novice.com
≈ estimated
07/08/2024
Hands-on review · Design and apps
Verdict
The Xiaomi Watch 2 is a durable Wear OS watch with accurate sensors, but its battery lasts about a day and it doesn't work with iPhone or Huawei.
altroconsumo.it
12/03/2024
Not graded yet
racunalniske-novice.com
07/08/2024
Not graded yet
7.5
androidplanet.nl
✓ explicit
06/05/2024
Hands-on test · Wear OS watch
Verdict
The Xiaomi Watch 2 is a light, smooth Wear OS watch lasting about two days, but unreliable step and workout tracking makes it hard to recommend.
coolesuggesties.nl
07/04/2024
Not graded yet
consumentenbond.nl
28/02/2024
Not graded yet
test-aankoop.be
15/02/2024
Not graded yet

Third-party reviews

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Xiaomi Watch 2

  • Affordable price point compared to other Wear OS smartwatches
  • High-quality 1.43-inch AMOLED display with great clarity and brightness
  • Lightweight and comfortable design suitable for 24/7 wear
  • Smooth performance powered by the Snapdragon W5+ Gen 1 processor
  • Access to a wide range of third-party apps via Google Play Store
  • Fast charging capabilities (recharges in approximately 35-45 minutes)

What we don't like about Xiaomi Watch 2

  • Underwhelming battery life, often requiring daily charging despite 65-hour claims
  • Inconsistent and erratic heart rate sensor data during high-intensity exercise
  • Unintuitive and cluttered Mi Fitness companion app
  • Lack of automatic workout tracking features
  • Aluminum bezel is reported to chip or dent relatively easily
  • Doesn't ship with the latest version of Wear OS

Verdict

The Xiaomi Watch 2 is an affordable Wear OS smartwatch powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon W5+ Gen 1 platform, featuring a 1.43-inch AMOLED display (466x466 resolution, 600 nits) and a lightweight 36.8g aluminum alloy case. It offers significant performance for its price with 2GB of RAM, 32GB of storage, 5ATM water resistance, and a dual-band L1+L5 GNSS for precise tracking across 160+ sports modes. Key pros include access to the Google Play Store ecosystem, a high-quality vibrant screen, and a competitive price point that delivers flagship-level hardware like the same processor found in the Pro model. However, notable cons include reported inconsistencies in heart rate sensor accuracy, a battery life that often falls short of the advertised 65 hours under typical use, and a slightly bulkier 47.5mm design that lacks the rotating crown found on more premium models.

Compare Xiaomi Watch 2 with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Xiaomi Watch 2 and other Smartwatches

No results found