OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Smartwatches Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 3,488 independent expert reviews and 5,037 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v2.0

Mobvoi Ticwatch E3 Review | 126 Data compared

Avg. price:~£180Screen size:1.30 inchBattery life:2 daysDisplay type:LCD

Mobvoi Ticwatch E3 Review: Compare 126 technical specifications and 23 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

7.2

Overall score

Score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartwatch's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartwatches on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 67% of models
Score components

70%

7.1

Technical score

30%

7.3

Review score ( 11 · 12)

Review score 30% · 7.3 · based on 23 independent reviews
Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 30%, technical score 70%. This model has enough reviews, so its review score is the weighted average of their grades. 4 more reviews are not scored yet.
â–²Better than 67% of smartwatches
7.1

Technical score

Technical score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 70% of models
Score components

24%

6.1

Health

21%

9.5

Fitness

16%

4.6

Battery

14%

8.6

Smart features

12%

7.0

Connectivity

9%

7.0

Display & Design

4%

6.4

Hardware

â–²Better than 70% of smartwatches
7.3

Review score

Review score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
Grades by review (23)
Text reviews 8
✓ explicit
7

7.1%

7.6

techgearlab.com

7.1%

7.0

techadvisor.com

7.1%

7.0

techradar.com

7.1%

6.0

expertreviews.co.uk

5.7%

8.0

androidcentral.com

5.7%

8.0

fashiontastes.com

5.7%

7.0

pocket-lint.com

≈ estimated
1

5.7%

8.0

droid-life.com

Video reviews 2

2.9%

9.0

Frankie Tech

2.9%

9.0

9to5Google

estimated from the review
11 reviews: 8 with a printed score, 3 estimated from the review. 12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 67% of smartwatches
  • mobvoi-ticwatch-e3
mobvoi-ticwatch-e3

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Mobvoi Ticwatch E3

Technical score
Technical score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 70% of models
Score components:

24%

6.1

Health

21%

9.5

Fitness

16%

4.6

Battery

14%

8.6

Smart features

12%

7.0

Connectivity

9%

7.0

Display & Design

4%

6.4

Hardware

7.1
Review score
Review score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
Grades by review (23)
Text reviews 8
✓ explicit
7

7.1%

7.6

techgearlab.com

7.1%

7.0

techadvisor.com

7.1%

7.0

techradar.com

7.1%

6.0

expertreviews.co.uk

5.7%

8.0

androidcentral.com

5.7%

8.0

fashiontastes.com

5.7%

7.0

pocket-lint.com

≈ estimated
1

5.7%

8.0

droid-life.com

Video reviews 2

2.9%

9.0

Frankie Tech

2.9%

9.0

9to5Google

estimated from the review
11 reviews: 8 with a printed score, 3 estimated from the review. 12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
7.3
Value for money
Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 67% of models
Score components:

60%

7.2

Overall score

40%

9.6

Price

7.9
Brand name
Mobvoi
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
â–² Better than 11% of models
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 10.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
â–² Better than 33% of models
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 33.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
Readings are for wellness use, not medical diagnosis.
ECG
no
ECG
no
â–¼ Worse than 17% of models
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
â–² Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings. 51.9% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
Supports abnormal high/low heart-rate alerts (typically after inactivity).
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
Accelerometer
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.6% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
yes
Barometer
yes
â–² Better than 51% of models
This smartwatch includes a barometer. 50.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
Gyroscope
yes
â–² Better than 30% of models
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 30.2% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
?
Distance tracking
yes
Distance tracking
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 4.1% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery life
2 days
Battery life
2 days
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch offers a battery life of 2 days which is shorter than that of 79.8% of smartwatches and equal to that of 4.6% of smartwatches.
Up to 72 hours in smart mode, 45 days in essential mode.
Battery life in training mode
10 h
Battery life in training mode
10 h
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
This smartwatch lasts 10 h in training mode which is shorter than 66.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 4.1% of smartwatches.
Battery life with GPS on
14 h
Battery life with GPS on
14 h
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
This smartwatch lasts 14 h with GPS on which is shorter than 64.9% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.9% of smartwatches.
Battery power
398 mAh
Battery power
398 mAh
â–² Better than 75% of models
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a battery capacity of 398 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 74.7% of smartwatches and equal to those in 0.2% of smartwatches.
Charge time
108 min
Charge time
108 min
â–² Better than 59% of models
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges in 108 min which is faster than 59.3% of smartwatches.
Approximate value from reported charging range: 108 minutes.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Wear OS
Operating system
Wear OS
â–² Better than 79% of models
This smartwatch runs Wear OS which is more advanced than the operating system in 79% of smartwatches and the same as that in 16.6% of smartwatches.
OS detail: Wear OS (3.5).
Software update frequency
ended
Software update frequency
ended
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
This smartwatch has ended software update support which is less active than that of 42.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 57.5% of smartwatches.
Third-party app support
yes
Third-party app support
yes
â–² Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports third-party apps. 52.4% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
Voice assistant support
yes
â–² Better than 32% of models
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 32.4% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
Cellular module
no
â–¼ Worse than 18% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 18% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
â–² Better than 44% of models
This smartwatch supports GPS. 43.9% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
â–¼ Worse than 39% of models
This smartwatch does not support Galileo navigation. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Compass
no
Compass
no
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This smartwatch does not include a compass. 52.7% of smartwatches include a compass.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen size
1.3 inch
Screen size
1.3 inch
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
This smartwatch has a screen size of 1.3 inch which is smaller than the screens of 66.8% of smartwatches and equal to those of 11.2% of smartwatches.
Display type
LCD
Display type
LCD
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
This smartwatch uses a LCD display type which is less advanced than that of 90.1% of smartwatches and the same as that of 7.4% of smartwatches.
Resolution
360x 360
Resolution
360x 360
â–² Better than 50% of models
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 360x360 which is higher than that of 50.2% of smartwatches and equal to that of 6.7% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
392 ppi
Pixel density
392 ppi
â–² Better than 66% of models
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 392 ppi which is higher than that of 66.2% of smartwatches and equal to that of 2.7% of smartwatches.
Display brightness
?
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
?
Processor model
Snapdragon Wear 4100
Processor model
Snapdragon Wear 4100
â–² Better than 73% of models
This smartwatch uses the Snapdragon Wear 4100 processor model.
RAM
1 GB
RAM
1 GB
â–² Better than 31% of models
Market range: <0.5 GB – >2 GB
This smartwatch has 1 GB of RAM which is larger than the RAM in 31.3% of smartwatches and equal to that of 45.8% of smartwatches.
Internal storage
8 GB
Internal storage
8 GB
â–² Better than 68% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch uses 8 GB for internal storage which is larger than that of 67.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 12.1% of smartwatches.
External memory slot
no
External memory slot
no
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more
What reviewers say

Mobvoi Ticwatch E3 vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • More advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Wear OS
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Wear OS vs Proprietary OS).
    OS detail: Wear OS (3.5).
    Wear OS vs Proprietary OS
  • Fall detection
    Fall detection
    yes
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    This smartwatch supports fall detection, the average smartwatch does not. 21.3% of smartwatches support fall detection.
  • Maps support
    Maps support
    yes
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 31.5% of smartwatches support maps.
  • VO2 max measurement
    VO2 max measurement
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch measures VO2 max, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • Emergency SOS
    Emergency SOS
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch includes Emergency SOS, the average smartwatch does not. 42.8% of smartwatches include Emergency SOS.
  • Supports wireless charging
    Wireless charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    This smartwatch supports wireless charging, the average smartwatch does not. 24.5% of smartwatches support wireless charging.
  • NFC functionality
    NFC
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 43.4% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • Third-party app support
    Third-party app support
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports third-party apps, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • 44.5% more popular
    Mobvoi Ticwatch E3 has a higher popularity than the average smartwatch (8.84 vs 6.1).
    8.84 vs 6.12
  • VO2 max measurement
    VO2 max measurement
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch measures VO2 max, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • Irregular heart rate alerts
    Irregular heart rate warnings
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does not. 48.1% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
    Supports abnormal high/low heart-rate alerts (typically after inactivity).
  • Weight tracking
    Weight tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This smartwatch supports weight tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 39.1% of smartwatches support weight tracking.
    Tracked through the companion app or smart-scale sync.
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    This smartwatch tracks water intake, the average smartwatch does not. 44% of smartwatches track water intake.
  • External heart rate monitor support
    External heart rate monitor compatibility
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports external heart rate monitor compatibility, the average smartwatch does not. 42.7% of smartwatches support external heart rate monitor compatibility.
    Compatible through third-party apps/workarounds.
  • Barometer sensor included
    Barometer
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This smartwatch includes a barometer, the average smartwatch does not. 49.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • Route support
    Route support
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch supports route support, the average smartwatch does not. 50% of smartwatches support route support.
    Route support available via companion app.
  • 20 more exercise profiles
    Multi-sport mode
    100
    â–² Better than 32% of models
    This smartwatch supports more exercise modes than the average smartwatch (100 vs 80). The average smartwatch supports 80 exercise modes.
    Reported as at least 100 exercise modes.
    100 vs 80
  • Supports wireless charging
    Wireless charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    This smartwatch supports wireless charging, the average smartwatch does not. 24.5% of smartwatches support wireless charging.
  • 12 min shorter charge time
    Charge time
    108 min
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    Market range: <60 min – >150 min
    This smartwatch charges faster than the average smartwatch (108 min vs 120 min). The average smartwatch charges in 120 min.
    Approximate value from reported charging range: 108 minutes.
    108 min vs 120 min
  • 98 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery life
    398 mAh days
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch has a larger battery capacity than the average smartwatch (398 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    Up to 72 hours in smart mode, 45 days in essential mode.
    398 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • Maps support
    Maps support
    yes
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 31.5% of smartwatches support maps.
  • NFC functionality
    NFC
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 43.4% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    Wi-Fi support
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.3% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • Rugged construction
    Rugged design
    yes
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This smartwatch has a rugged design, the average smartwatch does not. 37.9% of smartwatches have a rugged design.
  • 13 g lighter weight
    Weight
    32.0 g
    â–² Better than 81% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is lighter than the average smartwatch (32 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    Weight refers to watch case without strap/band.
    32.0 g vs 45.0 g
  • 2 mm narrower band
    Width of band
    20.0 mm
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    Market range: <20 mm – >22 mm
    This smartwatch has a narrower band width than the average smartwatch (20 mm vs 22 mm). The average smartwatch band is 22.0 mm wide.
    20.0 mm vs 22.0 mm
  • 66 ppi higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    392 ppi
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
    This smartwatch has a higher pixel density than the average smartwatch (392 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch display reaches 326 ppi.
    392 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • More advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Wear OS
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Wear OS vs Proprietary OS).
    OS detail: Wear OS (3.5).
    Wear OS vs Proprietary OS
  • Fall detection
    Fall detection
    yes
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    This smartwatch supports fall detection, the average smartwatch does not. 21.3% of smartwatches support fall detection.
  • Emergency SOS
    Emergency SOS
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch includes Emergency SOS, the average smartwatch does not. 42.8% of smartwatches include Emergency SOS.
  • Third-party app support
    Third-party app support
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports third-party apps, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • More advanced processor model
    Processor model
    Snapdragon Wear 4100
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This smartwatch uses the Snapdragon Wear 4100 processor model, while the average smartwatch uses Silicon Labs EFM32 Giant Gecko.
    Snapdragon Wear 4,100 vs Silicon Labs EFM32 Giant Gecko
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    This smartwatch uses LCD display technology, while the average smartwatch features AMOLED.
    LCD vs AMOLED
  • 48.5 m lower water resistance depth
    Waterproof depth rating
    1.5 m
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <1 m – >50 m
    This smartwatch has a shallower waterproof rating than the average smartwatch (1.5 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch reaches 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1.5 m vs 50 m
  • No coaching features
    Coaching
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 54.6% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • No compass
    Compass
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a compass, the average smartwatch does. 52.6% of smartwatches include a compass.
  • 5 days day/s shorter battery life
    Battery life
    2 days
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 2 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    Up to 72 hours in smart mode, 45 days in essential mode.
    2 days vs 7 days
  • 9.25 h shorter training battery life
    Battery life in training mode
    10 h
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
    This smartwatch lasts less in training mode than the average smartwatch (10 h vs 19.25 h). The average smartwatch lasts 19.25 h.
    10 h vs 19.25 h
  • Basic battery type
    Battery type
    Li-ion
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartwatch uses a Li-ion battery, while the average smartwatch uses Li-Po.
    Li-ion vs Li-Po
  • 6 h shorter GPS battery life
    Battery life with GPS on
    14 h
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
    This smartwatch lasts less with GPS on than the average smartwatch (14 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h.
    14 h vs 20 h
  • No coaching features
    Coaching
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 54.6% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • 5 days day/s shorter battery life
    Battery life
    2 days
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 2 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    Up to 72 hours in smart mode, 45 days in essential mode.
    2 days vs 7 days
  • 9.25 h shorter training battery life
    Battery life in training mode
    10 h
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
    This smartwatch lasts less in training mode than the average smartwatch (10 h vs 19.25 h). The average smartwatch lasts 19.25 h.
    10 h vs 19.25 h
  • Basic battery type
    Battery type
    Li-ion
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartwatch uses a Li-ion battery, while the average smartwatch uses Li-Po.
    Li-ion vs Li-Po
  • 6 h shorter GPS battery life
    Battery life with GPS on
    14 h
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
    This smartwatch lasts less with GPS on than the average smartwatch (14 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h.
    14 h vs 20 h
  • No compass
    Compass
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a compass, the average smartwatch does. 52.6% of smartwatches include a compass.
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    This smartwatch uses LCD display technology, while the average smartwatch features AMOLED.
    LCD vs AMOLED
  • 48.5 m lower water resistance depth
    Waterproof depth rating
    1.5 m
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <1 m – >50 m
    This smartwatch has a shallower waterproof rating than the average smartwatch (1.5 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch reaches 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1.5 m vs 50 m
  • 0.1 inch smaller screen size
    Screen size
    1.30 inch
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
    This smartwatch has a smaller screen size than the average smartwatch (1.3 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch screen is 1.40 inch.
    1.30 inch vs 1.40 inch
  • 1 mm thicker watch body
    Thickness
    12.60 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <9.8 mm – >14.1 mm
    This smartwatch is thicker than the average smartwatch (12.6 mm vs 11.6 mm). The average smartwatch thickness is 11.6 mm.
    12.60 mm vs 11.6 mm
  • 2 mm taller watch height
    Height
    47.0 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <39.5 mm – >51 mm
    This smartwatch is taller than the average smartwatch (47 mm vs 45 mm). The average smartwatch height is 45 mm.
    47.0 mm vs 45 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Frankie Tech
≈ estimated
02/07/2021
Unboxing and review · first impressions and a week of use
Verdict
Mobvoi Ticwatch E3 is excellent value with strong battery life and features, though it is less premium than the Pro 3.
9.0
9to5Google
≈ estimated
16/06/2021
Hands-on review · battery, fitness and design tests
Verdict
Mobvoi Ticwatch E3 has compromises on its charger, bezels and fit, but it is the best-value Wear OS watch with the latest chipset.
Not graded
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

What reviewers agree on

Based on 11 · 12

Reviewers praise the smooth performance and strong app support, but battery life, the display and build quality disappoint.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

7.0
techradar.com
✓ explicit
08/07/2021
Review · Health tracking watch
Verdict
The Mobvoi TicWatch E3 is a fast Wear OS watch with a large screen and many health apps, but its LCD display and wide bezel look basic.
8.0
androidcentral.com
✓ explicit
11/02/2022
Long-term review · Fitness tracking
Verdict
The Mobvoi TicWatch E3 is a Wear OS watch with a clean design, strong performance and solid battery, though its Wear OS 3.0 update is not due until mid-2022.
7.0
pocket-lint.com
✓ explicit
10/09/2021
Hands-on review · Sports tracking
Verdict
The Mobvoi TicWatch E3 is a light Wear OS watch for fitness, though its heart rate readings can be off and its battery is only average.
7.0
techadvisor.com
✓ explicit
20/10/2021
Day-to-day test · Wear OS watch
Verdict
The Mobvoi TicWatch E3 is a capable Wear OS watch with accurate fitness tracking, held back by a screen that's hard to read in sunlight and a cluttered interface.
6.0
expertreviews.co.uk
✓ explicit
09/09/2021
Hands-on test · Wear OS 3 upgrade
Verdict
The Mobvoi TicWatch E3 is a fast Wear OS watch confirmed for the Wear OS 3 upgrade, but it is thick, uncomfortable and has a confusing phone app.
7.6
techgearlab.com
✓ explicit
24/01/2023
Lab test · Android smartwatch
Verdict
The Mobvoi TicWatch E3 is a bare-bones Android watch that handles calls well but misses heartbeats during intense exercise and lasts only about 21 hours.
8.0
droid-life.com
≈ estimated
16/09/2021
Hands-on test · Wear OS 2 watch
Verdict
The Mobvoi TicWatch E3 runs smoothly and lasts about a day and a half, but its plastic build and uncertain Wear OS 3 timing make it a gamble.
8.0
fashiontastes.com
✓ explicit
06/07/2026
Long-term review · Fitness watch
Verdict
The Mobvoi TicWatch E3 is a strong fitness watch whose two-day battery and accurate tracking suit active people, but its plastic build feels less premium.
androidauthority.com
16/06/2021
Not graded yet
androidpolice.com
16/06/2021
Not graded yet
8.0
codegeek.es
≈ estimated
24/08/2022
Hands-on review · Health tracking
Verdict
The Mobvoi TicWatch E3 is a light, responsive Wear OS watch with nearly two days of battery, but its LCD screen has a wide bezel.
6.0
movilzona.es
≈ estimated
06/12/2023
Review · Wear OS fitness watch
Verdict
The Mobvoi TicWatch E3 is a Wear OS watch with calls, Google Pay and water resistance, but it can feel slow and its battery runs short.
7.6
smartworld.it
✓ explicit
30/05/2023
Hands-on review · Wear OS watch
Verdict
The Mobvoi TicWatch E3 is a snappy Wear OS watch with NFC, GPS and Play Store access, but its LCD screen is a compromise and it needs nightly charging.

Third-party reviews

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Mobvoi Ticwatch E3

  • Fast and smooth performance powered by the [Snapdragon Wear 4100 chip](https://www.techadvisor.com/article/722727/mobvoi-ticwatch-e3-review.html)
  • Comprehensive health tracking including [SpO2, heart rate, and sleep monitoring](https://www.techgearlab.com/reviews/health-fitness/smartwatch/mobvoi-ticwatch-e3)
  • Affordable entry point for [Wear OS](https://saiganak.com/review/mobvoi-ticwatch-e3/) with support for Google Pay and Google Assistant
  • Lightweight and comfortable design suitable for [24/7 wear](https://www.reddit.com/r/WearOS/comments/okxwy3/ticwatch_e3_review/)
  • Reliable [built-in GPS](https://www.techgearlab.com/reviews/health-fitness/smartwatch/mobvoi-ticwatch-e3) for phone-free outdoor exercise tracking
  • Includes a speaker and microphone for [taking calls directly](https://www.pocket-lint.com/fitness-trackers/reviews/158146-ticwatch-e3-review/) on the watch

What we don't like about Mobvoi Ticwatch E3

  • LCD screen lacks the [vibrancy and deep blacks](https://www.techradar.com/reviews/ticwatch-e3) of OLED displays
  • Large, thick bezels result in a [bulky look](https://www.expertreviews.co.uk/beauty-wellness/wearables/ticwatch-e3-review) on smaller wrists
  • Average battery life typically lasting only [1 to 2 days](https://www.pocket-lint.com/fitness-trackers/reviews/158146-ticwatch-e3-review/) in smart mode
  • Lack of [automatic brightness sensor](https://www.techgearlab.com/reviews/health-fitness/smartwatch/mobvoi-ticwatch-e3) requires manual adjustments
  • Vibration motor is described as [weak or noisy](https://www.reddit.com/r/WearOS/comments/o167ze/ticwatch_e3_review_the_best_wear_os_watch_to_this/) rather than tactile
  • Requirement to use both [Google Wear OS and Mobvoi apps](https://www.techadvisor.com/article/722727/mobvoi-ticwatch-e3-review.html) can be clunky

Verdict

The Mobvoi TicWatch E3 is a mid-range smartwatch powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 4100 platform with 1GB of RAM and 8GB of internal storage. It features a 1.3-inch high-density LCD (360 x 360 px) under 2.5D curved glass and is housed in a lightweight 32g polycarbonate and glass fiber case. Key specifications include built-in GPS (GPS+GLONASS+Beidou), an IP68 waterproof rating suitable for pool swimming, and a suite of health sensors for 24-hour heart rate monitoring, SpO2 tracking, and sleep analysis. Main pros include its smooth performance, NFC support for Google Pay, a built-in speaker and microphone for calls, and an 'Essential Mode' that extends its 380mAh battery life when power is low. However, notable cons include its use of an LCD panel rather than a more vibrant AMOLED screen, the absence of an auto-brightness sensor, a relatively bulky bezel design, and a plastic build that feels less premium than metal competitors.

Compare Mobvoi Ticwatch E3 with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Mobvoi Ticwatch E3 and other Smartwatches

No results found