OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Smartwatches Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 3,488 independent expert reviews and 5,192 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v2.0

Google Pixel Watch 3 45mm Review | 126 Data compared

Avg. price:~£190Screen size:1.40 inchBattery life:1 daysDisplay type:AMOLED

Google Pixel Watch 3 45mm Review: Compare 126 technical specifications and 22 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

8.1

Overall score

Score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartwatch's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartwatches on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 89% of models
Score components

70%

8.1

Technical score

30%

8.3

Review score ( 10 · 12)

Review score 30% · 8.3 · based on 22 independent reviews
Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 30%, technical score 70%. This model has enough reviews, so its review score is the weighted average of their grades. 34 more reviews are not scored yet.
â–²Better than 89% of smartwatches
8.1

Technical score

Technical score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 87% of models
Score components

24%

8.6

Health

21%

8.6

Fitness

16%

4.3

Battery

14%

9.7

Smart features

12%

8.9

Connectivity

9%

8.2

Display & Design

4%

9.1

Hardware

â–²Better than 87% of smartwatches
8.3

Review score

Review score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 84% of models
Grades by review (22)
10 reviews: 9 with a printed score, 1 estimated from the review. 12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 5
✓ explicit
4

7.9%

9.0

tomsguide.com

6.3%

9.0

androidcentral.com

6.3%

8.7

eftm.com

6.3%

8.0

gizmodo.com

≈ estimated
1

6.3%

9.0

techbuzzireland.com

Video reviews 4

3.2%

9.0

GH Tech Review

3.2%

9.0

Pocketnow

3.2%

9.0

DC Rainmaker

3.2%

9.0

Android Authority

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
â–²Better than 84% of smartwatches
  • google-pixel-watch-3-45-mm
  • google-pixel-watch-3-45-mm
  • google-pixel-watch-3-45-mm
  • google-pixel-watch-3-45-mm
  • google-pixel-watch-3-45-mm
  • google-pixel-watch-3-45-mm
  • google-pixel-watch-3-45-mm
  • google-pixel-watch-3-45-mm
  • google-pixel-watch-3-45-mm
  • google-pixel-watch-3-45-mm
  • google-pixel-watch-3-45-mm
  • google-pixel-watch-3-45-mm
google-pixel-watch-3-45-mm
google-pixel-watch-3-45-mm
google-pixel-watch-3-45-mm
google-pixel-watch-3-45-mm
google-pixel-watch-3-45-mm
google-pixel-watch-3-45-mm
google-pixel-watch-3-45-mm
google-pixel-watch-3-45-mm
google-pixel-watch-3-45-mm
google-pixel-watch-3-45-mm
google-pixel-watch-3-45-mm
google-pixel-watch-3-45-mm

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Google Pixel Watch 3 45mm

Technical score
Technical score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 87% of models
Score components:

24%

8.6

Health

21%

8.6

Fitness

16%

4.3

Battery

14%

9.7

Smart features

12%

8.9

Connectivity

9%

8.2

Display & Design

4%

9.1

Hardware

8.1
Review score
Review score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 84% of models
Grades by review (22)
10 reviews: 9 with a printed score, 1 estimated from the review. 12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 5
✓ explicit
4

7.9%

9.0

tomsguide.com

6.3%

9.0

androidcentral.com

6.3%

8.7

eftm.com

6.3%

8.0

gizmodo.com

≈ estimated
1

6.3%

9.0

techbuzzireland.com

Video reviews 4

3.2%

9.0

GH Tech Review

3.2%

9.0

Pocketnow

3.2%

9.0

DC Rainmaker

3.2%

9.0

Android Authority

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
8.3
Popularity
Popularity
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartwatch.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 82% of models
Popularity:
Google Pixel Watch 3 45mm has a popularity of 8.8 points, which is higher than 81.5% of smartwatches.
8.8
Value for money
Value for money
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 93% of models
Score components:

60%

8.1

Overall score

40%

9.5

Price

8.6
Brand name
Google
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
â–² Better than 11% of models
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 10.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
â–² Better than 33% of models
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 33.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
yes
ECG
yes
â–² Better than 84% of models
This smartwatch supports ECG. 83.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
â–² Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings. 51.9% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
Accelerometer
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.6% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
yes
Barometer
yes
â–² Better than 51% of models
This smartwatch includes a barometer. 50.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
Gyroscope
yes
â–² Better than 30% of models
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 30.2% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
no
Cadence sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 31.2% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
Distance tracking
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 4.1% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery life
1 day
Battery life
1 days
â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch offers a battery life of 1 days which is shorter than that of 87.3% of smartwatches and equal to that of 8.6% of smartwatches.
Up to 36 hours with battery saver.
Battery life in training mode
22 h
Battery life in training mode
22 h
â–² Better than 57% of models
Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
This smartwatch lasts 22 h in training mode which is longer than 56.9% of smartwatches and equal to that of 1.2% of smartwatches.
Battery life with GPS on
11 h
Battery life with GPS on
11 h
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
This smartwatch lasts 11 h with GPS on which is shorter than 71.7% of smartwatches.
Battery power
364 mAh
Battery power
364 mAh
â–² Better than 70% of models
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a battery capacity of 364 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 69.7% of smartwatches.
Charge time
80 min
Charge time
80 min
â–² Better than 75% of models
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges in 80 min which is faster than 75.2% of smartwatches and equal to the charge time of 0.8% of smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Wear OS
Operating system
Wear OS
â–² Better than 79% of models
This smartwatch runs Wear OS which is more advanced than the operating system in 79% of smartwatches and the same as that in 16.6% of smartwatches.
OS detail: Wear OS (5).
Software update frequency
occasional
Software update frequency
occasional
â–² Better than 58% of models
This smartwatch has occasional software update support which is more active than that of 57.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 36.2% of smartwatches.
Updates are typically released about every 3 months.
Third-party app support
yes
Third-party app support
yes
â–² Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports third-party apps. 52.4% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
Voice assistant support
yes
â–² Better than 32% of models
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 32.4% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
yes
Cellular module
yes
â–² Better than 82% of models
This smartwatch includes a cellular module. 82.2% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
1
SIM cards
1
â–² Better than 2% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This smartwatch uses 1 for cellular connectivity which is more advanced than that of 2% of smartwatches and the same as that of 98% of smartwatches.
eSIM
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
â–² Better than 44% of models
This smartwatch supports GPS. 43.9% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
yes
Galileo support
yes
â–² Better than 62% of models
This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation. 61.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Compass
yes
Compass
yes
â–² Better than 47% of models
This smartwatch includes a compass. 47.5% of smartwatches include a compass.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen size
1.4 inch
Screen size
1.4 inch
â–² Better than 49% of models
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
This smartwatch has a screen size of 1.4 inch which is larger than the screens of 48.8% of smartwatches and equal to those of 6.7% of smartwatches.
Some sources mention multiple/uncertain size variants.
Display type
AMOLED
Display type
AMOLED
â–² Better than 50% of models
This smartwatch uses a AMOLED display type which is more advanced than that of 49.9% of smartwatches and the same as that of 50.1% of smartwatches.
LTPO panel wording.
Resolution
456x 456
Resolution
456x 456
â–² Better than 87% of models
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 456x456 which is higher than that of 86.7% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.3% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
320 ppi
Pixel density
320 ppi
â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 320 ppi which is lower than that of 58.1% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.4% of smartwatches.
Display brightness
2000 nits
Display brightness
2000 nits
â–² Better than 89% of models
Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
This smartwatch reaches 2000 nits of display brightness, which is higher than that of 88.8% of smartwatches and equal to that of 5.9% of smartwatches.
Lab-measured brightness figure.
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
4x 1.7 GHz
CPU speed
4x 1.7 GHz
★ Better than 91% of models
This smartwatch uses a CPU configuration of 4x1.7 GHz which is faster than that in 90.8% of smartwatches and equal to that in 8% of smartwatches.
Derived from core-count and per-core clock notation
Processor model
Snapdragon W5 Gen 1
Processor model
Snapdragon W5 Gen 1
â–² Better than 80% of models
This smartwatch uses the Snapdragon W5 Gen 1 processor model.
RAM
2 GB
RAM
2 GB
â–² Better than 78% of models
Market range: <0.5 GB – >2 GB
This smartwatch has 2 GB of RAM which is larger than the RAM in 77.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 21.4% of smartwatches.
Internal storage
32 GB
Internal storage
32 GB
â–² Better than 85% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch uses 32 GB for internal storage which is larger than that of 84.7% of smartwatches and equal to that of 13.4% of smartwatches.
External memory slot
no
External memory slot
no
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Google Pixel Watch 3 45mm vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • ECG support
    ECG
    yes
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    This smartwatch supports ECG, the average smartwatch does not. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
  • Temperature sensing
    Temperature sensor
    yes
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This smartwatch includes a temperature sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 26.8% of smartwatches include a temperature sensor.
  • More advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Wear OS
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Wear OS vs Proprietary OS).
    OS detail: Wear OS (5).
    Wear OS vs Proprietary OS
  • Crash detection capability
    Crash detection
    yes
    â–² Better than 87% of models
    This smartwatch supports crash detection, the average smartwatch does not. 12.6% of smartwatches support crash detection.
  • Built-in cellular module
    Cellular module
    yes
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    This smartwatch includes a cellular module, the average smartwatch does not. 17.9% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
  • Readiness score
    Readiness score
    yes
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    This smartwatch supports readiness scores, the average smartwatch does not. 17.5% of smartwatches support readiness scores.
  • Fall detection
    Fall detection
    yes
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    This smartwatch supports fall detection, the average smartwatch does not. 21.3% of smartwatches support fall detection.
  • HRV tracking
    HRV tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 40.8% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • 13.8% better value for money
    Google Pixel Watch 3 45mm has a higher value-for-money score than the average smartwatch (8.56 vs 7.5).
    8.56 vs 7.52
  • 43.9% more popular
    Google Pixel Watch 3 45mm has a higher popularity than the average smartwatch (8.81 vs 6.1).
    8.81 vs 6.12
  • ECG support
    ECG
    yes
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    This smartwatch supports ECG, the average smartwatch does not. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
  • Temperature sensing
    Temperature sensor
    yes
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This smartwatch includes a temperature sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 26.8% of smartwatches include a temperature sensor.
  • Readiness score
    Readiness score
    yes
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    This smartwatch supports readiness scores, the average smartwatch does not. 17.5% of smartwatches support readiness scores.
  • HRV tracking
    HRV tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 40.8% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • VO2 max measurement
    VO2 max measurement
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch measures VO2 max, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • Irregular heart rate alerts
    Irregular heart rate warnings
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does not. 48.1% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • Weight tracking
    Weight tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This smartwatch supports weight tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 39.1% of smartwatches support weight tracking.
    Tracked through the companion app or smart-scale sync.
  • Barometer sensor included
    Barometer
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This smartwatch includes a barometer, the average smartwatch does not. 49.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • Route support
    Route support
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch supports route support, the average smartwatch does not. 50% of smartwatches support route support.
    Supports route guidance in Google Maps on the watch.
  • 40 min shorter charge time
    Charge time
    80 min
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <60 min – >150 min
    This smartwatch charges faster than the average smartwatch (80 min vs 120 min). The average smartwatch charges in 120 min.
    80 min vs 120 min
  • 64 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery life
    364 mAh days
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch has a larger battery capacity than the average smartwatch (364 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    Up to 36 hours with battery saver.
    364 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • Built-in cellular module
    Cellular module
    yes
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    This smartwatch includes a cellular module, the average smartwatch does not. 17.9% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
  • Maps support
    Maps support
    yes
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 31.5% of smartwatches support maps.
  • NFC functionality
    NFC
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 43.4% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    Wi-Fi support
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.3% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • Galileo satellite support
    Galileo support
    yes
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation, the average smartwatch does not. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.3
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    This smartwatch supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average smartwatch (5.3 vs 5). The average smartwatch uses 5.0.
    5.3 vs 5.0
  • UWB chip
    UWB chip
    yes
    ★ Better than 98% of models
    This smartwatch includes a UWB chip, while the average smartwatch does not. 2.3% of smartwatches include UWB.
  • 1,400 nits higher display brightness
    Display brightness
    2000 nits
    â–² Better than 89% of models
    Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
    This smartwatch has higher display brightness than the average smartwatch (2000 nits vs 600 nits). The average smartwatch reaches 600 nits.
    Lab-measured brightness figure.
    2,000 nits vs 600 nits
  • Stronger display glass
    Display glass type
    Corning Gorilla Glass 5
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    This smartwatch uses Corning Gorilla Glass 5 display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 5 vs mineral glass
  • Higher resolution
    Display type
    456 x 456
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 456x456, while the average smartwatch reaches 352x430.
    LTPO panel wording.
    456x456 vs 352x430
  • 2 mm narrower band
    Width of band
    20.0 mm
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    Market range: <20 mm – >22 mm
    This smartwatch has a narrower band width than the average smartwatch (20 mm vs 22 mm). The average smartwatch band is 22.0 mm wide.
    Uses proprietary/non-standard band connector.
    20.0 mm vs 22.0 mm
  • 8 g lighter weight
    Weight
    37.0 g
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is lighter than the average smartwatch (37 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    Weight refers to watch case without strap/band.
    37.0 g vs 45.0 g
  • More advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Wear OS
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Wear OS vs Proprietary OS).
    OS detail: Wear OS (5).
    Wear OS vs Proprietary OS
  • Crash detection capability
    Crash detection
    yes
    â–² Better than 87% of models
    This smartwatch supports crash detection, the average smartwatch does not. 12.6% of smartwatches support crash detection.
  • Fall detection
    Fall detection
    yes
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    This smartwatch supports fall detection, the average smartwatch does not. 21.3% of smartwatches support fall detection.
  • Emergency SOS
    Emergency SOS
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch includes Emergency SOS, the average smartwatch does not. 42.8% of smartwatches include Emergency SOS.
  • Third-party app support
    Third-party app support
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports third-party apps, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • More frequent updates
    Software update frequency
    occasional
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    This smartwatch receives occasional software updates, while the average smartwatch receives ended updates.
    Updates are typically released about every 3 months.
    occasional vs ended
  • 28 GB more storage
    Internal storage
    32 GB
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
    This smartwatch offers more internal storage than the average smartwatch (32 GB vs 4 GB). The average smartwatch provides 4 GB of storage.
    32 GB vs 4 GB
  • 1 GB more RAM
    RAM
    2 GB
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <0.5 GB – >2 GB
    This smartwatch has more RAM than the average smartwatch (2 GB vs 1 GB). The average smartwatch includes 1 GB of RAM.
    2 GB vs 1 GB
  • Faster CPU speed
    CPU speed
    4 x 1.7 GHz
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    This smartwatch uses a CPU configuration of 4x1.7 GHz, while the average smartwatch uses 1 GHz.
    Derived from core-count and per-core clock notation
    4x1.7 GHz vs 1 GHz
  • 3 year/s newer release date
    Release date
    2024
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This smartwatch has a newer release date than the average smartwatch (2024 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    September 2024
    2024 vs 2021
  • More advanced processor model
    Processor model
    Snapdragon W5 Gen 1
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    This smartwatch uses the Snapdragon W5 Gen 1 processor model, while the average smartwatch uses Silicon Labs EFM32 Giant Gecko.
    Snapdragon W5 Gen 1 vs Silicon Labs EFM32 Giant Gecko
  • No multi-sport mode
    Multi-sport mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a multi-sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 68.4% of smartwatches include a multi-sport mode.
  • 6 days day/s shorter battery life
    Battery life
    1 days
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 1 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    Up to 36 hours with battery saver.
    1 days vs 7 days
  • 9 h shorter GPS battery life
    Battery life with GPS on
    11 h
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
    This smartwatch lasts less with GPS on than the average smartwatch (11 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h.
    11 h vs 20 h
  • No iOS compatibility
    iOS compatibility
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    This smartwatch offers less complete iOS compatibility than the average smartwatch (no vs yes).
  • Basic battery type
    Battery type
    Li-ion
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartwatch uses a Li-ion battery, while the average smartwatch uses Li-Po.
    Sources report rechargeable lithium chemistry as Li-ion or Li-Po.
    Li-ion vs Li-Po
  • No smart alarm
    Smart alarm
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 52.7% of smartwatches support smart alarms.
  • 0.7 mm thicker watch body
    Thickness
    12.30 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    Market range: <9.8 mm – >14.1 mm
    This smartwatch is thicker than the average smartwatch (12.3 mm vs 11.6 mm). The average smartwatch thickness is 11.6 mm.
    12.30 mm vs 11.6 mm
  • 40 fewer exercise profiles
    Multi-sport mode
    40
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartwatch supports fewer exercise modes than the average smartwatch (40 vs 80). The average smartwatch supports 80 exercise modes.
    Reported as at least 40 exercise modes.
    40 vs 80
  • 46.2% more expensive
    Google Pixel Watch 3 45mm is more expensive than the average smartwatch (£190 vs £130).
    £190 vs £130
  • No multi-sport mode
    Multi-sport mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a multi-sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 68.4% of smartwatches include a multi-sport mode.
  • 3,534 m lower max altitude
    Maximum altitude
    5,000 m
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    Market range: <3k m – >9.1k m
    This smartwatch supports a lower maximum altitude than the average smartwatch (5000 m vs 8534 m). The average smartwatch reaches 8534 m.
    5,000 m vs 8,534 m
  • 40 fewer exercise profiles
    Multi-sport mode
    40
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartwatch supports fewer exercise modes than the average smartwatch (40 vs 80). The average smartwatch supports 80 exercise modes.
    Reported as at least 40 exercise modes.
    40 vs 80
  • 6 days day/s shorter battery life
    Battery life
    1 days
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 1 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    Up to 36 hours with battery saver.
    1 days vs 7 days
  • 9 h shorter GPS battery life
    Battery life with GPS on
    11 h
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
    This smartwatch lasts less with GPS on than the average smartwatch (11 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h.
    11 h vs 20 h
  • Basic battery type
    Battery type
    Li-ion
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartwatch uses a Li-ion battery, while the average smartwatch uses Li-Po.
    Sources report rechargeable lithium chemistry as Li-ion or Li-Po.
    Li-ion vs Li-Po
  • No iOS compatibility
    iOS compatibility
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    This smartwatch offers less complete iOS compatibility than the average smartwatch (no vs yes).
  • 0.7 mm thicker watch body
    Thickness
    12.30 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    Market range: <9.8 mm – >14.1 mm
    This smartwatch is thicker than the average smartwatch (12.3 mm vs 11.6 mm). The average smartwatch thickness is 11.6 mm.
    12.30 mm vs 11.6 mm
  • 10 °C lower max temperature
    Maximum operating temperature
    35.0 °C
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
    Market range: <35 °C – >60 °C
    This smartwatch handles a lower maximum operating temperature than the average smartwatch (35 °C vs 45 °C). The average smartwatch reaches 45.0 °C.
    35.0 °C vs 45.0 °C
  • 3 mm wider watch width
    Width
    45.0 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <34.6 mm – >46.8 mm
    This smartwatch is wider than the average smartwatch (45 mm vs 42 mm). The average smartwatch width is 42.0 mm.
    45.0 mm vs 42.0 mm
  • No smart alarm
    Smart alarm
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 52.7% of smartwatches support smart alarms.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
GH Tech Review
≈ estimated
22/10/2024
Long-term test · several weeks of daily use
Verdict
Google Pixel Watch 3 45mm is a polished, premium Android watch for Google users, held back only by a few missing features.
9.0
GH Tech Review
≈ estimated
22/10/2024
Long-term test · several weeks of daily use
Verdict
Google Pixel Watch 3 45mm is a polished, premium Android watch for Google users, held back only by a few missing features.
9.0
Pocketnow
≈ estimated
01/10/2024
Hands-on review · fitness, battery and ecosystem
Verdict
Google Pixel Watch 3 45mm is recommended for Wear OS users who want the best experience, though it locks you into its ecosystem.
9.0
DC Rainmaker
≈ estimated
16/09/2024
In-depth review · three weeks of fitness and running tests
Verdict
Google Pixel Watch 3 45mm is very strong for fitness and outdoor use, with top-tier heart rate accuracy but uneven GPS.
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

What reviewers agree on

Based on 10 · 13

Reviewers like the workout and health tracking and the screen, but battery life, the software and the paid subscription draw complaints.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

androidpolice.com
09/09/2024
Not graded yet
pcmag.com
09/09/2024
Not graded yet
cnet.com
09/09/2024
Not graded yet
techradar.com
11/09/2024
Not graded yet
droid-life.com
11/09/2024
Not graded yet
9to5google.com
15/09/2024
Not graded yet
dcrainmaker.com
16/09/2024
Not graded yet
irishexaminer.com
03/10/2024
Not graded yet
wareable.com
03/10/2024
Not graded yet
techadvisor.com
03/10/2024
Not graded yet
trustedreviews.com
17/10/2024
Not graded yet
8.0
gizmodo.com
✓ explicit
10/12/2024
Upgrade review · Large-screen smartwatch
Verdict
The Google Pixel Watch 3 45mm suits anyone wanting a bigger screen, but owners of the first two generations shouldn't rush to upgrade.
9.0
techbuzzireland.com
≈ estimated
30/01/2025
Hands-on review · Bigger display
Verdict
The Google Pixel Watch 3 45mm is a worthwhile upgrade from the first model, with a bigger screen and nearly two days of battery, though advanced fitness needs Fitbit Premium.
9.0
tomsguide.com
✓ explicit
26/02/2025
Hands-on test · Battery life
Verdict
The Google Pixel Watch 3 45mm is a strong Android pick that lasts up to 48 hours per charge, though its rounded bezel is still rather large.
wired.com
09/09/2024
Not graded yet
pickr.com.au
17/09/2024
Not graded yet
8.7
eftm.com
✓ explicit
02/12/2024
Long-term test · Running watch
Verdict
The Pixel Watch 3 is a clear step up from the Pixel Watch 2, with about 36 hours of battery and better running tools, though it trails Fitbit trackers.
9.0
androidcentral.com
✓ explicit
12/06/2025
Long-term test · Wear OS watch
Verdict
The Pixel Watch 3 is a bright, comfortable Wear OS watch best suited to Pixel phone owners, but its battery trails rival watches.
8.2
computerbild.de
✓ explicit
16/12/2025
Lab test · Health smartwatch
Verdict
The Pixel Watch 3 is a stylish, accurate health watch with useful sleep and Google features, but its battery still lasts only about one day.
8.0
netzwelt.de
✓ explicit
10/01/2025
Hands-on test · Fitness smartwatch
Verdict
The Pixel Watch 3 is a versatile Google watch with a new training-load score, but serious athletes will miss support for outside heart-rate straps and power meters.
computerbase.de
08/10/2024
Not graded yet
pcwelt.de
14/11/2024
Not graded yet
8.0
computerwoche.de
✓ explicit
26/11/2024
Hands-on test · Wear OS watch
Verdict
The Google Pixel Watch 3 45mm handles messages, music and Google apps well, but its battery is limited and its GPS isn't the best.
vybe.ch
18/11/2024
Not graded yet
connect.de
13/09/2024
Not graded yet
digitec.ch
09/09/2024
Not graded yet
lesnumeriques.com
10/09/2024
Not graded yet
presse-citron.net
11/09/2024
Not graded yet
xavierstuder.com
23/09/2024
Not graded yet
7.9
test-achats.be
✓ explicit
17/02/2026
Lab test · Fitness smartwatch
Verdict
The Google Pixel Watch 3 45mm is a well-built Android fitness watch with strong heart-rate and messaging features, but its battery is only average.
01net.com
11/09/2024
Not graded yet
smartphoneman.nl
15/10/2024
Not graded yet
7.9
test-aankoop.be
✓ explicit
27/02/2026
Lab test · Android fitness watch
Verdict
The Google Pixel Watch 3 45mm is a sturdy Android fitness watch with strong heart-rate tracking and voice control, but its battery is only average.

Third-party reviews

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Google Pixel Watch 3 45mm

  • Significantly improved battery life compared to 41mm, often reaching 48 hours with Always-On Display
  • Large, bright 2,000-nit Actua display with a smooth 60Hz refresh rate
  • Accurate heart rate and sleep tracking, often compared favorably to the Apple Watch
  • Deep integration with the Google ecosystem, including Nest and Google Home controls
  • Advanced fitness features for runners, such as 'Cardio Load' and 'Readiness Score'
  • Comfortable and lightweight design despite the larger 45mm case size

What we don't like about Google Pixel Watch 3 45mm

  • Prone to scratches due to the domed Gorilla Glass 5 design without a protective metal bezel
  • Lacks 'on-demand' measurements for blood oxygen and stress tracking
  • Advanced AI-powered health insights require a paid Fitbit Premium subscription
  • Single-band GPS may be less accurate than dual-band competitors in dense urban environments
  • Higher price point compared to similar Android wearables like the Samsung Galaxy Watch 7
  • Proprietary band system requires new straps for the 45mm model

Verdict

The Google Pixel Watch 3 45mm features a 1.46-inch Actua AMOLED LTPO display that is 40% larger than previous models and hits a peak brightness of 2,000 nits with a dynamic 1–60Hz refresh rate. Powered by the Qualcomm SW5100 processor and Wear OS 5, it includes 32GB of storage, 2GB of RAM, and a 420mAh battery providing up to 24 hours with always-on display or 36 hours in battery saver mode. Main pros include its significantly improved outdoor visibility, sleek 100% recycled aluminium design, and advanced Fitbit integration offering metrics like Daily Readiness and Cardio Load. However, notable cons include its relatively high price point compared to rivals, the lack of new hardware sensors over the previous generation, and limited compatibility as it does not work with iOS devices.

Compare Google Pixel Watch 3 45mm with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Google Pixel Watch 3 45mm and other Smartwatches

No results found