OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Smartwatches Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 3,488 independent expert reviews and 5,192 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v2.0

Google Pixel Watch 2 Review | 126 Data compared

Avg. price:~£180Screen size:1.20 inchBattery life:1 daysDisplay type:AMOLED

Google Pixel Watch 2 Review: Compare 126 technical specifications and 22 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

8.1

Overall score

Score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartwatch's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartwatches on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 86% of models
Score components

70%

8.2

Technical score

30%

7.7

Review score ( 10 · 12)

Review score 30% · 7.7 · based on 22 independent reviews
Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 30%, technical score 70%. This model has enough reviews, so its review score is the weighted average of their grades. 39 more reviews are not scored yet.
â–²Better than 86% of smartwatches
8.2

Technical score

Technical score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 90% of models
Score components

24%

8.5

Health

21%

9.1

Fitness

16%

5.0

Battery

14%

9.7

Smart features

12%

8.8

Connectivity

9%

7.6

Display & Design

4%

9.1

Hardware

★Better than 90% of smartwatches
7.7

Review score

Review score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 52% of models
Grades by review (22)
10 reviews: 8 with a printed score, 2 estimated from the review. 12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 4
✓ explicit
3

7.7%

8.0

au.pcmag.com

6.2%

8.0

androidpolice.com

6.2%

8.0

whatsthebest.co.uk

≈ estimated
1

6.2%

6.0

inverse.com

Video reviews 3

3.1%

8.0

The Quantified Scientist

3.1%

8.0

TechMishka

3.1%

6.0

9to5Google

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
â–²Better than 52% of smartwatches
  • google-pixel-watch-2
  • google-pixel-watch-2
  • google-pixel-watch-2
  • google-pixel-watch-2
  • google-pixel-watch-2
  • google-pixel-watch-2
  • google-pixel-watch-2
  • google-pixel-watch-2
  • google-pixel-watch-2
  • google-pixel-watch-2
  • google-pixel-watch-2
  • google-pixel-watch-2
  • google-pixel-watch-2
google-pixel-watch-2
google-pixel-watch-2
google-pixel-watch-2
google-pixel-watch-2
google-pixel-watch-2
google-pixel-watch-2
google-pixel-watch-2
google-pixel-watch-2
google-pixel-watch-2
google-pixel-watch-2
google-pixel-watch-2
google-pixel-watch-2
google-pixel-watch-2

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Google Pixel Watch 2

Technical score
Technical score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 90% of models
Score components:

24%

8.5

Health

21%

9.1

Fitness

16%

5.0

Battery

14%

9.7

Smart features

12%

8.8

Connectivity

9%

7.6

Display & Design

4%

9.1

Hardware

8.2
Review score
Review score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 52% of models
Grades by review (22)
10 reviews: 8 with a printed score, 2 estimated from the review. 12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 4
✓ explicit
3

7.7%

8.0

au.pcmag.com

6.2%

8.0

androidpolice.com

6.2%

8.0

whatsthebest.co.uk

≈ estimated
1

6.2%

6.0

inverse.com

Video reviews 3

3.1%

8.0

The Quantified Scientist

3.1%

8.0

TechMishka

3.1%

6.0

9to5Google

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
7.7
Popularity
Popularity
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartwatch.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 77% of models
Popularity:
Google Pixel Watch 2 has a popularity of 8.5 points, which is higher than 77.4% of smartwatches.
8.5
Value for money
Value for money
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 90% of models
Score components:

60%

8.1

Overall score

40%

9.6

Price

8.5
Brand name
Google
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
â–² Better than 11% of models
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 10.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
â–² Better than 33% of models
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 33.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
yes
ECG
yes
â–² Better than 84% of models
This smartwatch supports ECG. 83.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
Availability may vary by region or model version. May require a compatible phone, software version, or app setup.
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
â–² Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings. 51.9% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
Accelerometer
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.6% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
yes
Barometer
yes
â–² Better than 51% of models
This smartwatch includes a barometer. 50.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
Gyroscope
yes
â–² Better than 30% of models
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 30.2% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
yes
Cadence sensor
yes
â–² Better than 69% of models
This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor. 69% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
Distance tracking
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 4.1% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
Battery life
1 day
Battery life
1 days
â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch offers a battery life of 1 days which is shorter than that of 87.3% of smartwatches and equal to that of 8.6% of smartwatches.
Up to 24 hours with aod.
Battery life in training mode
10 h
Battery life in training mode
10 h
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
This smartwatch lasts 10 h in training mode which is shorter than 66.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 4.1% of smartwatches.
Battery life with GPS on
?
Battery power
300 mAh
Battery power
300 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 49% of models
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a battery capacity of 300 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 44.5% of smartwatches and equal to those in 6.7% of smartwatches.
Charge time
75 min
Charge time
75 min
â–² Better than 76% of models
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges in 75 min which is faster than 76.2% of smartwatches and equal to the charge time of 3.3% of smartwatches.
Approximate value from reported charging range: 75 minutes.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Wear OS
Operating system
Wear OS
â–² Better than 79% of models
This smartwatch runs Wear OS which is more advanced than the operating system in 79% of smartwatches and the same as that in 16.6% of smartwatches.
OS detail: Wear OS (4).
Software update frequency
occasional
Software update frequency
occasional
â–² Better than 58% of models
This smartwatch has occasional software update support which is more active than that of 57.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 36.2% of smartwatches.
Updates are typically released about every 3 months.
Third-party app support
yes
Third-party app support
yes
â–² Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports third-party apps. 52.4% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
Voice assistant support
yes
â–² Better than 32% of models
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 32.4% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
yes
Cellular module
yes
â–² Better than 82% of models
This smartwatch includes a cellular module. 82.2% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
Cellular support may depend on LTE/GPS+Cellular variant selection.
SIM cards
1
SIM cards
1
â–² Better than 2% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This smartwatch uses 1 for cellular connectivity which is more advanced than that of 2% of smartwatches and the same as that of 98% of smartwatches.
eSIM on LTE models only.
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
â–² Better than 44% of models
This smartwatch supports GPS. 43.9% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
yes
Galileo support
yes
â–² Better than 62% of models
This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation. 61.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Compass
yes
Compass
yes
â–² Better than 47% of models
This smartwatch includes a compass. 47.5% of smartwatches include a compass.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen size
1.2 inch
Screen size
1.2 inch
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
This smartwatch has a screen size of 1.2 inch which is smaller than the screens of 85.3% of smartwatches and equal to those of 8% of smartwatches.
Display type
AMOLED
Display type
AMOLED
â–² Better than 50% of models
This smartwatch uses a AMOLED display type which is more advanced than that of 49.9% of smartwatches and the same as that of 50.1% of smartwatches.
Resolution
450x 450
Resolution
450x 450
â–² Better than 79% of models
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 450x450 which is higher than that of 79% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.7% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
530 ppi
Pixel density
530 ppi
★ Better than 100% of models
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 530 ppi which is higher than that of 99.9% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.2% of smartwatches.
Display brightness
1,000 nits
Display brightness
1,000 nits
â–² Better than 59% of models
Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
This smartwatch reaches 1,000 nits of display brightness, which is higher than that of 59.4% of smartwatches and equal to that of 26.5% of smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
4x 1.7 GHz
CPU speed
4x 1.7 GHz
★ Better than 91% of models
This smartwatch uses a CPU configuration of 4x1.7 GHz which is faster than that in 90.8% of smartwatches and equal to that in 8% of smartwatches.
Derived from core-count and per-core clock notation
Processor model
Snapdragon W5 Gen 1
Processor model
Snapdragon W5 Gen 1
â–² Better than 80% of models
This smartwatch uses the Snapdragon W5 Gen 1 processor model.
RAM
2 GB
RAM
2 GB
â–² Better than 78% of models
Market range: <0.5 GB – >2 GB
This smartwatch has 2 GB of RAM which is larger than the RAM in 77.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 21.4% of smartwatches.
Internal storage
32 GB
Internal storage
32 GB
â–² Better than 85% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch uses 32 GB for internal storage which is larger than that of 84.7% of smartwatches and equal to that of 13.4% of smartwatches.
External memory slot
no
External memory slot
no
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Google Pixel Watch 2 vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • ECG support
    ECG
    yes
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    This smartwatch supports ECG, the average smartwatch does not. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
    Availability may vary by region or model version. May require a compatible phone, software version, or app setup.
  • Temperature sensing
    Temperature sensor
    yes
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This smartwatch includes a temperature sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 26.8% of smartwatches include a temperature sensor.
  • More advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Wear OS
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Wear OS vs Proprietary OS).
    OS detail: Wear OS (4).
    Wear OS vs Proprietary OS
  • Crash detection capability
    Crash detection
    yes
    â–² Better than 87% of models
    This smartwatch supports crash detection, the average smartwatch does not. 12.6% of smartwatches support crash detection.
  • Built-in cellular module
    Cellular module
    yes
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    This smartwatch includes a cellular module, the average smartwatch does not. 17.9% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
    Cellular support may depend on LTE/GPS+Cellular variant selection.
  • Readiness score
    Readiness score
    yes
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    This smartwatch supports readiness scores, the average smartwatch does not. 17.5% of smartwatches support readiness scores.
  • Fall detection
    Fall detection
    yes
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    This smartwatch supports fall detection, the average smartwatch does not. 21.3% of smartwatches support fall detection.
  • HRV tracking
    HRV tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 40.8% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • 13.2% better value for money
    Google Pixel Watch 2 has a higher value-for-money score than the average smartwatch (8.51 vs 7.5).
    8.51 vs 7.52
  • ECG support
    ECG
    yes
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    This smartwatch supports ECG, the average smartwatch does not. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
    Availability may vary by region or model version. May require a compatible phone, software version, or app setup.
  • Temperature sensing
    Temperature sensor
    yes
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This smartwatch includes a temperature sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 26.8% of smartwatches include a temperature sensor.
  • Readiness score
    Readiness score
    yes
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    This smartwatch supports readiness scores, the average smartwatch does not. 17.5% of smartwatches support readiness scores.
  • HRV tracking
    HRV tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 40.8% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • VO2 max measurement
    VO2 max measurement
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch measures VO2 max, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • Irregular heart rate alerts
    Irregular heart rate warnings
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does not. 48.1% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • Perspiration monitoring
    Perspiration monitoring
    yes
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    This smartwatch tracks perspiration, the average smartwatch does not. 14.1% of smartwatches track perspiration.
  • Barometer sensor included
    Barometer
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This smartwatch includes a barometer, the average smartwatch does not. 49.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • Cadence tracking
    Cadence sensor
    yes
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 31.1% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
  • Route support
    Route support
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch supports route support, the average smartwatch does not. 50% of smartwatches support route support.
  • 45 min shorter charge time
    Charge time
    75 min
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <60 min – >150 min
    This smartwatch charges faster than the average smartwatch (75 min vs 120 min). The average smartwatch charges in 120 min.
    Approximate value from reported charging range: 75 minutes.
    75 min vs 120 min
  • Built-in cellular module
    Cellular module
    yes
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    This smartwatch includes a cellular module, the average smartwatch does not. 17.9% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
    Cellular support may depend on LTE/GPS+Cellular variant selection.
  • Maps support
    Maps support
    yes
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 31.5% of smartwatches support maps.
    Maps via Google Maps app.
  • NFC functionality
    NFC
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 43.4% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    Wi-Fi support
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.3% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • Galileo satellite support
    Galileo support
    yes
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation, the average smartwatch does not. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
  • Stronger display glass
    Display glass type
    Corning Gorilla Glass 5
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    This smartwatch uses Corning Gorilla Glass 5 display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 5 vs mineral glass
  • 204 ppi higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    530 ppi
    ★ Better than 100% of models
    Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
    This smartwatch has a higher pixel density than the average smartwatch (530 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch display reaches 326 ppi.
    530 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • 400 nits higher display brightness
    Display brightness
    1,000 nits
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
    This smartwatch has higher display brightness than the average smartwatch (1000 nits vs 600 nits). The average smartwatch reaches 600 nits.
    1,000 nits vs 600 nits
  • 14 g lighter weight
    Weight
    31.0 g
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is lighter than the average smartwatch (31 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    Weight refers to watch case without strap/band.
    31.0 g vs 45.0 g
  • Higher resolution
    Display type
    450 x 450
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 450x450, while the average smartwatch reaches 352x430.
    450x450 vs 352x430
  • 2 mm narrower band
    Width of band
    20.0 mm
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    Market range: <20 mm – >22 mm
    This smartwatch has a narrower band width than the average smartwatch (20 mm vs 22 mm). The average smartwatch band is 22.0 mm wide.
    20.0 mm vs 22.0 mm
  • 4 mm shorter watch height
    Height
    41.0 mm
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    Market range: <39.5 mm – >51 mm
    This smartwatch is shorter than the average smartwatch (41 mm vs 45 mm). The average smartwatch height is 45 mm.
    41.0 mm vs 45 mm
  • More advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Wear OS
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Wear OS vs Proprietary OS).
    OS detail: Wear OS (4).
    Wear OS vs Proprietary OS
  • Crash detection capability
    Crash detection
    yes
    â–² Better than 87% of models
    This smartwatch supports crash detection, the average smartwatch does not. 12.6% of smartwatches support crash detection.
  • Fall detection
    Fall detection
    yes
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    This smartwatch supports fall detection, the average smartwatch does not. 21.3% of smartwatches support fall detection.
  • Emergency SOS
    Emergency SOS
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch includes Emergency SOS, the average smartwatch does not. 42.8% of smartwatches include Emergency SOS.
  • Third-party app support
    Third-party app support
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports third-party apps, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • More frequent updates
    Software update frequency
    occasional
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    This smartwatch receives occasional software updates, while the average smartwatch receives ended updates.
    Updates are typically released about every 3 months.
    occasional vs ended
  • 28 GB more storage
    Internal storage
    32 GB
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
    This smartwatch offers more internal storage than the average smartwatch (32 GB vs 4 GB). The average smartwatch provides 4 GB of storage.
    32 GB vs 4 GB
  • 1 GB more RAM
    RAM
    2 GB
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <0.5 GB – >2 GB
    This smartwatch has more RAM than the average smartwatch (2 GB vs 1 GB). The average smartwatch includes 1 GB of RAM.
    2 GB vs 1 GB
  • Faster CPU speed
    CPU speed
    4 x 1.7 GHz
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    This smartwatch uses a CPU configuration of 4x1.7 GHz, while the average smartwatch uses 1 GHz.
    Derived from core-count and per-core clock notation
    4x1.7 GHz vs 1 GHz
  • 2 year/s newer release date
    Release date
    2023
    â–² Better than 70% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This smartwatch has a newer release date than the average smartwatch (2023 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    October 2023
    2023 vs 2021
  • More advanced processor model
    Processor model
    Snapdragon W5 Gen 1
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    This smartwatch uses the Snapdragon W5 Gen 1 processor model, while the average smartwatch uses Silicon Labs EFM32 Giant Gecko.
    Snapdragon W5 Gen 1 vs Silicon Labs EFM32 Giant Gecko
  • No multi-sport mode
    Multi-sport mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a multi-sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 68.4% of smartwatches include a multi-sport mode.
  • 49 m lower water resistance depth
    Waterproof depth rating
    1 m
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <1 m – >50 m
    This smartwatch has a shallower waterproof rating than the average smartwatch (1 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch reaches 50 m.
    0.1 ATM class (ISO 22,810 shallow-water rating, not diving certification).
    1 m vs 50 m
  • 6 days day/s shorter battery life
    Battery life
    1 days
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 1 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    Up to 24 hours with aod.
    1 days vs 7 days
  • 9.25 h shorter training battery life
    Battery life in training mode
    10 h
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
    This smartwatch lasts less in training mode than the average smartwatch (10 h vs 19.25 h). The average smartwatch lasts 19.25 h.
    10 h vs 19.25 h
  • No iOS compatibility
    iOS compatibility
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    This smartwatch offers less complete iOS compatibility than the average smartwatch (no vs yes).
  • 0.2 inch smaller screen size
    Screen size
    1.20 inch
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
    This smartwatch has a smaller screen size than the average smartwatch (1.2 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch screen is 1.40 inch.
    1.20 inch vs 1.40 inch
  • Basic battery type
    Battery type
    Li-ion
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartwatch uses a Li-ion battery, while the average smartwatch uses Li-Po.
    Li-ion vs Li-Po
  • No smart alarm
    Smart alarm
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 52.7% of smartwatches support smart alarms.
  • No multi-sport mode
    Multi-sport mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a multi-sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 68.4% of smartwatches include a multi-sport mode.
  • 3,534 m lower max altitude
    Maximum altitude
    5,000 m
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    Market range: <3k m – >9.1k m
    This smartwatch supports a lower maximum altitude than the average smartwatch (5000 m vs 8534 m). The average smartwatch reaches 8534 m.
    5,000 m vs 8,534 m
  • 40 fewer exercise profiles
    Multi-sport mode
    40
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartwatch supports fewer exercise modes than the average smartwatch (40 vs 80). The average smartwatch supports 80 exercise modes.
    Reported as at least 40 exercise modes.
    40 vs 80
  • 6 days day/s shorter battery life
    Battery life
    1 days
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 1 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    Up to 24 hours with aod.
    1 days vs 7 days
  • 9.25 h shorter training battery life
    Battery life in training mode
    10 h
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
    This smartwatch lasts less in training mode than the average smartwatch (10 h vs 19.25 h). The average smartwatch lasts 19.25 h.
    10 h vs 19.25 h
  • Basic battery type
    Battery type
    Li-ion
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartwatch uses a Li-ion battery, while the average smartwatch uses Li-Po.
    Li-ion vs Li-Po
  • No iOS compatibility
    iOS compatibility
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    This smartwatch offers less complete iOS compatibility than the average smartwatch (no vs yes).
  • 49 m lower water resistance depth
    Waterproof depth rating
    1 m
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <1 m – >50 m
    This smartwatch has a shallower waterproof rating than the average smartwatch (1 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch reaches 50 m.
    0.1 ATM class (ISO 22,810 shallow-water rating, not diving certification).
    1 m vs 50 m
  • 0.2 inch smaller screen size
    Screen size
    1.20 inch
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
    This smartwatch has a smaller screen size than the average smartwatch (1.2 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch screen is 1.40 inch.
    1.20 inch vs 1.40 inch
  • 0.7 mm thicker watch body
    Thickness
    12.30 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    Market range: <9.8 mm – >14.1 mm
    This smartwatch is thicker than the average smartwatch (12.3 mm vs 11.6 mm). The average smartwatch thickness is 11.6 mm.
    12.30 mm vs 11.6 mm
  • 10 °C lower max temperature
    Maximum operating temperature
    35.0 °C
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
    Market range: <35 °C – >60 °C
    This smartwatch handles a lower maximum operating temperature than the average smartwatch (35 °C vs 45 °C). The average smartwatch reaches 45.0 °C.
    35.0 °C vs 45.0 °C
  • No smart alarm
    Smart alarm
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 52.7% of smartwatches support smart alarms.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

6.0
9to5Google
≈ estimated
24/06/2024
Long-term review · 8 months of daily use
Verdict
Google Pixel Watch 2 is a decent smartwatch with strong fitness tracking, but battery life is too inconsistent for some buyers.
6.0
9to5Google
≈ estimated
24/06/2024
Long-term review · 8 months of daily use
Verdict
Google Pixel Watch 2 is a decent smartwatch with strong fitness tracking, but battery life is too inconsistent for some buyers.
8.0
TechMishka
≈ estimated
16/11/2023
Hands-on review · few weeks of daily use
Verdict
Google Pixel Watch 2 is not perfect, with scratch-prone glass and short battery life, but it is the most logical pick for Android users.
8.0
TechMishka
≈ estimated
16/11/2023
Hands-on review · few weeks of daily use
Verdict
Google Pixel Watch 2 is not perfect, with scratch-prone glass and short battery life, but it is the most logical pick for Android users.
8.0
The Quantified Scientist
✓ explicit
15/10/2023
Hands-on test · heart rate, sleep and GPS accuracy
Verdict
Google Pixel Watch 2 is a promising early pick, with improved heart rate tracking and solid GPS, though more tests are pending.
8.0
The Quantified Scientist
✓ explicit
15/10/2023
Hands-on test · heart rate, sleep and GPS accuracy
Verdict
Google Pixel Watch 2 is a promising early pick, with improved heart rate tracking and solid GPS, though more tests are pending.
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

What reviewers agree on

Based on 10 · 12

Reviewers like the sleek design, health tracking and Google integration, but battery life, case size and subscription costs draw complaints.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

techradar.com
26/10/2023
Not graded yet
theguardian.com
26/10/2023
Not graded yet
trustedreviews.com
20/10/2023
Not graded yet
wired.com
13/10/2023
Not graded yet
uk.pcmag.com
11/10/2023
Not graded yet
t3.com
11/10/2023
Not graded yet
stuff.tv
11/10/2023
Not graded yet
coachweb.com
03/11/2023
Not graded yet
dcrainmaker.com
03/11/2023
Not graded yet
expertreviews.co.uk
22/12/2023
Not graded yet
8.0
whatsthebest.co.uk
✓ explicit
18/07/2024
Month-long test · Health tracking
Verdict
The Google Pixel Watch 2 suits Android users who already use Google apps and Fitbit, but its battery and crown button are weak points.
theverge.com
11/10/2023
Not graded yet
8.0
au.pcmag.com
✓ explicit
27/02/2026
In-depth review · Battery and health
Verdict
The Google Pixel Watch 2 is a light Android watch whose battery easily lasts a full day, though its weak speaker and missing compass app hold it back.
6.0
inverse.com
≈ estimated
27/02/2026
Multi-week test · Android smartwatch
Verdict
The Google Pixel Watch 2 beats its predecessor on battery and comfort, but random shutdowns and a small screen keep it behind the Apple Watch.
8.0
androidpolice.com
✓ explicit
27/02/2026
Hands-on review · Wear OS watch
Verdict
The Google Pixel Watch 2 is the update the original should have been, with all-day battery life, but its dim screen and thick bezels still hold it back.
chip.de
21/11/2023
Not graded yet
8.0
computerbild.de
✓ explicit
28/11/2024
Full test · Health and sensors
Verdict
The Google Pixel Watch 2 fixes the first model's slow response and adds stronger health sensors, but its battery and limited workout features keep it from the top.
digitec.ch
12/10/2023
Not graded yet
chip.de
13/11/2023
Not graded yet
heise.de
21/12/2023
Not graded yet
teknofilo.com
28/10/2023
Not graded yet
8.0
zonamovilidad.es
✓ explicit
22/08/2024
Hands-on test · Design and battery
Verdict
The Google Pixel Watch 2 is a smooth, well-finished Android watch whose battery is its weak point, so expect to charge it almost daily.
elespanol.com
11/10/2023
Not graded yet
andreagaleazzi.com
13/10/2023
Not graded yet
galaxus.it
12/10/2023
Not graded yet
evosmart.it
19/10/2023
Not graded yet
tech.everyeye.it
04/11/2023
Not graded yet
8.0
global.techradar.com
✓ explicit
23/08/2024
Week-long test · Wear OS watch
Verdict
The Google Pixel Watch 2 is a sensible upgrade with better battery life, sensors and processor, and the top Wear OS pick overall, though its look barely changes.
smartworld.it
13/10/2023
Not graded yet

Third-party reviews

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Google Pixel Watch 2

  • Improved performance with a faster, snappier processor for smooth UI navigation
  • Stylish, comfortable, and lightweight design, particularly for smaller wrists
  • Highly accurate health and fitness tracking, including improved heart rate and sleep monitoring
  • Strong integration with the Google ecosystem, including Assistant, Gmail, and Google Wallet
  • Faster charging speeds compared to the first-generation model
  • Helpful new safety features like Safety Check and a stress-monitoring cEDA sensor

What we don't like about Google Pixel Watch 2

  • Battery life, while improved, often requires daily charging and can be inconsistent under heavy use
  • Relatively high price point compared to rivals like the Samsung Galaxy Watch series
  • Available in only one 41mm size, which can look too small on larger wrists
  • Many advanced health metrics and features are locked behind a paid Fitbit Premium subscription
  • The watch is non-repairable, meaning a broken screen often requires a full replacement
  • The domed glass design is prone to scratches and does not use more durable sapphire glass

Verdict

The Google Pixel Watch 2 is a refined Android-exclusive smartwatch featuring a 41mm recycled aluminium housing and a 1.2-inch AMOLED display (320 ppi) protected by 3D Corning Gorilla Glass 5. Powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon W5 Gen 1 processor with 2GB of RAM and 32GB of storage, it runs Wear OS 4 and integrates advanced Fitbit health sensors, including a multi-path heart rate tracker, a cEDA sensor for stress monitoring, and a skin temperature sensor. Its primary advantages are a lightweight, comfortable design, snappy performance, and a battery life that now reaches a full 24 hours with the always-on display enabled, supplemented by fast charging that reaches 50% in 30 minutes. However, notable drawbacks include the lack of a larger size option, relatively thick display bezels, and the requirement of a Fitbit Premium subscription to unlock the most detailed health and sleep insights.

Compare Google Pixel Watch 2 with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Google Pixel Watch 2 and other Smartwatches

No results found