Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartwatches Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v3.0

Garmin Forerunner 265 review: 127 specs compared

Avg. price:~£?Screen size:1.3 inchBattery life:13 daysDisplay type:AMOLED

Garmin Forerunner 265 Review: Compare 127 technical specifications, 31 expert and video reviews and 7 best-of lists to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

Garmin Forerunner 265
8.4/10

Overall score

Score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

35%

8.1

Technical score

30%

8.3

List score

25%

8.3

Reviews score

10%

9.5

Sentiment score

★Better than 93% of smartwatches
?

Value for money

Value for money
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.4

Overall score

30%

?

Price

Price not known yet
8.1

Technical score

Technical score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

24%

8.7

Health

21%

9.9

Fitness

16%

6.8

Battery

14%

8.6

Smart features

12%

7.5

Connectivity

9%

8.1

Display & Design

4%

1.7

Hardware

▲Better than 87%
8.3

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.5 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10

80%

8.2

Average grade

20%

8.7

Popularity

Grades by review (31)
8 reviews + 23 videos, average 8.3/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
▲Better than 76%
8.3

List score

List score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (7)
List score: in 7 of 120 lists (6%)
★Better than 93%
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Smartwatches model ranking

Ranked #55 of 777 models in Smartwatches (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Garmin Forerunner 265

Technical score
Technical score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

24%

8.7

Health

21%

9.9

Fitness

16%

6.8

Battery

14%

8.6

Smart features

12%

7.5

Connectivity

9%

8.1

Display & Design

4%

1.7

Hardware

8.1
Reviews score
8.3
List score
8.3
Value for money
Value for money
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

8.4

Overall score

30%

?

Price

8.9
Heart rate monitor
yes
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 9.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 30.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
?
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings. 49.5% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
HRV tracking
yes
This smartwatch supports HRV tracking. 54.9% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
Show more
Accelerometer
yes
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.5% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
yes
This smartwatch includes a barometer. 46.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 28.9% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
?
Distance tracking
yes
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 3.7% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery life
13 days
This smartwatch lasts 13 days on a charge, which is longer than 73.2% of Smartwatches and the same as 0.5% of Smartwatches.
Battery life in training mode
20 h
This smartwatch records workouts for 20 h on a charge, which is longer than 48% of Smartwatches and the same as 3.8% of Smartwatches.
Battery life with GPS on
20 h
This smartwatch lasts 20 h with GPS on, which is shorter than 52.5% of Smartwatches and the same as 6% of Smartwatches.
Battery power
2000 mAh
This smartwatch has a 2000 mAh battery, which is larger than 100% of Smartwatches.
Charge time
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Garmin OS
This smartwatch runs Garmin OS, which is more advanced than the system in 70.8% of Smartwatches and equal to 9.2% of Smartwatches.
Software update frequency
occasional
This smartwatch has occasional software update support which is more active than that of 54% of smartwatches and equal to that of 40.2% of smartwatches.
Third-party app support
yes
This smartwatch supports third-party apps. 48.5% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 16.6% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
yes
This smartwatch supports GPS. 40.3% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
yes
This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation. 56.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Dual-frequency GPS
yes
Garmin Forerunner 265 supports dual-frequency GPS. 85% of Smartwatches offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen size
1.3 inch
This smartwatch has a 1.3 inch screen, which is smaller than 67.1% of Smartwatches and the same as 10.8% of Smartwatches.
Display type
AMOLED
This smartwatch uses AMOLED, which is more advanced than the screen in 46.9% of Smartwatches and equal to 53.1% of Smartwatches.
Resolution
416x 416
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 416x416 which is higher than that of 70.7% of smartwatches and equal to that of 3.5% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
?
Display brightness
?
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
?
Processor model
?
RAM
?
Internal storage
8 GB
This smartwatch has 8 GB of internal storage, which is more than 65.5% of Smartwatches and equal to 11.3% of Smartwatches.
External memory slot
no
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Garmin Forerunner 265 vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • Temperature sensing
    This smartwatch includes a temperature sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 31.9% of smartwatches include a temperature sensor.
  • Crash detection capability
    This smartwatch supports crash detection, the average smartwatch does not. 14% of smartwatches support crash detection.
  • Readiness score
    This smartwatch supports readiness scores, the average smartwatch does not. 19.8% of smartwatches support readiness scores.
  • HRV tracking
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 45.2% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • More advanced operating system
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Garmin OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Garmin OS vs Proprietary OS
  • Emergency SOS
    This smartwatch includes Emergency SOS, the average smartwatch does not. 44.8% of smartwatches include Emergency SOS.
  • 6 days longer battery life
    This smartwatch runs longer per charge than the average smartwatch (13 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    13 days vs 7 days
  • More frequent updates
    This smartwatch receives occasional software updates, while the average smartwatch receives ended updates.
    occasional vs ended
  • 18.6% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.5 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    80%

    8.2

    Average grade

    20%

    8.7

    Popularity

    Grades by review (31)
    8 reviews + 23 videos, average 8.3/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.3 vs 7.0
  • 26.7% higher sentiment score
    9.5 vs 7.5
  • 14.2% better value for money
    Garmin Forerunner 265 has a higher value-for-money score than the average smartwatch (8.87 vs 7.8).
    8.87 vs 7.76
  • 5.1% higher list score
    List score
    8.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
    How we count it
    Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
    Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
    Lists with this model (7)
    List score: in 7 of 120 lists (6%)
    8.3 vs 7.9
  • Temperature sensing
    This smartwatch includes a temperature sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 31.9% of smartwatches include a temperature sensor.
  • Readiness score
    This smartwatch supports readiness scores, the average smartwatch does not. 19.8% of smartwatches support readiness scores.
  • HRV tracking
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 45.2% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • Weight tracking
    This smartwatch supports weight tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 41.9% of smartwatches support weight tracking.
  • Water intake tracking
    This smartwatch tracks water intake, the average smartwatch does not. 44.1% of smartwatches track water intake.
  • 2 years newer
    This smartwatch was released more recently than the average smartwatch (2023 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    2,023 vs 2,021
  • Perspiration monitoring
    This smartwatch tracks perspiration, the average smartwatch does not. 15.1% of smartwatches track perspiration.
  • External heart rate monitor support
    This smartwatch supports external heart rate monitor compatibility, the average smartwatch does not. 46.6% of smartwatches support external heart rate monitor compatibility.
  • 6 days longer battery life
    This smartwatch runs longer per charge than the average smartwatch (13 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    13 days vs 7 days
  • 1,695 mAh larger battery capacity
    This smartwatch has a larger battery than the average smartwatch (2000 mAh vs 305 mAh). The average smartwatch has a 305 mAh battery.
    2,000 mAh vs 305 mAh
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.5% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • Supports ANT+
    This smartwatch supports ANT+, the average smartwatch does not. 13% of smartwatches support ANT+.
  • Supports dual-frequency GPS
    Garmin Forerunner 265 supports dual-frequency GPS, while the average smartwatch does not. 15.1% of Smartwatches support dual-frequency GPS.
  • Galileo satellite support
    This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation, the average smartwatch does not. 43.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
  • Stronger display glass
    This smartwatch uses Corning Gorilla Glass 3 display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 3 vs mineral glass
  • Higher resolution
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 416x416, while the average smartwatch reaches 360x360.
    416x416 vs 360x360
  • Crash detection capability
    This smartwatch supports crash detection, the average smartwatch does not. 14% of smartwatches support crash detection.
  • More advanced operating system
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Garmin OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Garmin OS vs Proprietary OS
  • Emergency SOS
    This smartwatch includes Emergency SOS, the average smartwatch does not. 44.8% of smartwatches include Emergency SOS.
  • More frequent updates
    This smartwatch receives occasional software updates, while the average smartwatch receives ended updates.
    occasional vs ended
  • 2x more internal storage
    This smartwatch has more internal storage than the average smartwatch (8 GB vs 4 GB). The average smartwatch has 4 GB of internal storage.
    8 GB vs 4 GB
  • No speaker
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.7% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.
  • 1 fewer microphones
    This smartwatch has fewer microphones than the average smartwatch (0 vs 1). The average smartwatch has 1 microphones.
    0 vs 1
  • Basic battery type
    This smartwatch uses a Li-ion battery, while the average smartwatch uses Li-Po.
    Li-ion vs Li-Po
  • 0.1 inch smaller display
    This smartwatch has a smaller screen than the average smartwatch (1.3 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch has a 1.4 inch screen.
    1.3 inch vs 1.4 inch
  • 1.2 mm thicker
    This smartwatch is thicker than the average smartwatch (12.9 mm vs 11.7 mm). The average smartwatch is 11.7 mm thick.
    12.9 mm vs 11.7 mm
  • No smart alarm
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 50.6% of smartwatches support smart alarms.
  • 1 h shorter GPS battery life
    This smartwatch lasts less time with GPS on than the average smartwatch (20 h vs 21 h). The average smartwatch lasts 21 h with GPS on.
    20 h vs 21 h
  • 3.6 mm wider case
    This smartwatch has a wider case than the average smartwatch (46.1 mm vs 42.5 mm). The average smartwatch measures 42.5 mm across.
    46.1 mm vs 42.5 mm
  • Basic battery type
    This smartwatch uses a Li-ion battery, while the average smartwatch uses Li-Po.
    Li-ion vs Li-Po
  • 1 h shorter GPS battery life
    This smartwatch lasts less time with GPS on than the average smartwatch (20 h vs 21 h). The average smartwatch lasts 21 h with GPS on.
    20 h vs 21 h
  • 0.1 inch smaller display
    This smartwatch has a smaller screen than the average smartwatch (1.3 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch has a 1.4 inch screen.
    1.3 inch vs 1.4 inch
  • 1.2 mm thicker
    This smartwatch is thicker than the average smartwatch (12.9 mm vs 11.7 mm). The average smartwatch is 11.7 mm thick.
    12.9 mm vs 11.7 mm
  • 3.6 mm wider case
    This smartwatch has a wider case than the average smartwatch (46.1 mm vs 42.5 mm). The average smartwatch measures 42.5 mm across.
    46.1 mm vs 42.5 mm
  • No smart alarm
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 50.6% of smartwatches support smart alarms.
  • No speaker
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.7% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.
  • 1 fewer microphones
    This smartwatch has fewer microphones than the average smartwatch (0 vs 1). The average smartwatch has 1 microphones.
    0 vs 1

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Wearholic
≈ estimated
19/10/2026
Long-term review · over a year of daily use
Verdict
Garmin Forerunner 265 is still an excellent buy for runners and fitness users, though it lacks LTE and a large app ecosystem.
7.0
Verified Reviews
≈ estimated
25/01/2026
Long-term review · three weeks of daily training
Verdict
Garmin Forerunner 265 is a cautious buy, mainly for road runners who value the screen and comfort over maps.
9.0
Matt LeGrand
≈ estimated
14/01/2024
Hands-on review · GPS and heart rate accuracy tests
Verdict
Garmin Forerunner 265 is accurate and good value for its price, though its plastic build is less durable than pricier rivals.
4.0
Running Shoes Guru
≈ estimated
24/10/2023
Long-term test · navigation, heart rate and design
Verdict
Garmin Forerunner 265 is not recommended at this price, as better options exist for navigation and heart-rate reading.
8.0
NDTV
≈ estimated
07/05/2023
Hands-on review · a few days of use by a runner
Verdict
Garmin Forerunner 265 is a great watch with long battery life, though its price feels high for the smart features.
9.0
Connect The Watts
≈ estimated
06/05/2023
Long-term test · over a month of use, accuracy and app tests
Verdict
Garmin Forerunner 265 is one of the best new sports watches this year, especially for road runners who do not need full maps.
9.0
The Run Testers
≈ estimated
27/03/2023
Multi-tester review · one month of running and triathlon use
Verdict
Garmin Forerunner 265 is a great all-round sports watch, excellent for training, though its price jump is hard to ignore.
9.0
DC Rainmaker
≈ estimated
03/03/2023
In-depth review · training metrics, GPS, heart rate, battery tests
Verdict
Garmin Forerunner 265 is a low-risk upgrade with an AMOLED display and solid accuracy, though it adds few new features over the 255.
9.0
Eslam
≈ estimated
11/10/2025
Short review · a few weeks of training use
Verdict
Garmin Forerunner 265 is reliable, accurate and comfortable for athletes, though battery life and missing maps are the main drawbacks.
9.0
The Run Testers
≈ estimated
02/03/2023
First look · one week of testing and early verdict
Verdict
Garmin Forerunner 265 is a very good watch and a cheaper alternative to top Garmin models, though its price has risen.
9.0
Lena On Earth
≈ estimated
12/08/2023
First look · unboxing and first run
Verdict
Garmin Forerunner 265 is recommended for experienced athletes who want a good sports watch, though the lack of maps is its main drawback.
Overview video

What reviewers agree on

Based on 8 · 12

Reviewers love the bright screen, accurate GPS and detailed training analysis, but agree battery life is short and maps are lacking.
Praised
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

9.0
businessinsider.com
≈ estimated
14/01/2026
Two-month test · Running watch
Verdict
The Garmin Forerunner 265 suits active people who want accurate tracking and running features, though it cannot reply to texts from the wrist.
9.0
health.eliteaifinds.com
✓ explicit
03/05/2026
Weeks-long test · Running watch
Verdict
The Garmin Forerunner 265 suits serious runners who want a vivid screen and adaptive coaching, but its GPS battery falls short for ultramarathons.
8.0
morgenpost.de
✓ explicit
10/08/2026
Hands-on test · Running watch
Verdict
The Garmin Forerunner 265 is an easy-to-use running watch with Forerunner 965-level GPS and heart rate tracking, though its screen is more reflective and battery lasts about four days.
9.0
runmaster-lab.fr
≈ estimated
22/08/2026
Lab test · Running watch
Verdict
The Garmin Forerunner 265 is a strong mid-range running watch with a crisp touchscreen and GPS, but it lacks maps and its battery drains faster with Bluetooth music.
9.0
preference-nature.fr
≈ estimated
13/07/2026
Six-month test · Running watch
Verdict
The Garmin Forerunner 265 suits road runners training for races up to a marathon, but its battery is too short for long ultras.
9.0
epoptrail.fr
≈ estimated
24/07/2026
Six-week test · Trail running watch
Verdict
The Garmin Forerunner 265 suits runners and trail runners in day-long races, but with music on, the battery lasts only 6 to 7 hours.
8.5
runmorph.com
✓ explicit
12/07/2026
Long-term test · Running watch
Verdict
The Garmin Forerunner 265 suits runners who want a clear AMOLED screen, precise dual-frequency GPS and full coaching, but ultra runners needing long GPS battery life should look elsewhere.
9.4
confrontomiglioriprodotti.it
✓ explicit
02/07/2026
Hands-on test · Running watch
Verdict
The Garmin Forerunner 265 is the most balanced running watch for most runners, with reliable GPS and a bright AMOLED screen, though battery life is shorter.

Third-party reviews

What we like about Garmin Forerunner 265

  • The AMOLED display stays readable in full sun.
  • 13 days of battery life in smartwatch mode covers a long trip.
  • Dual-frequency GPS keeps tracks steady near buildings and under trees.
  • A readiness score shows when to push hard and when to ease off.
  • An always-on mode keeps the AMOLED screen visible.
  • Crash detection and ANT+ support add safety and sensor options.

What we don't like about Garmin Forerunner 265

  • Playing music over Bluetooth cuts battery life to about 6 to 7 hours in tests.
  • The 12.9 mm thickness makes it sit high on the wrist.
  • There is no fall detection.
  • The charging cable is proprietary and not USB-C.
  • Heart rate can lag during very short, intense intervals.

Verdict

A bright screen for sunny runs is the draw of the Garmin Forerunner 265. Its AMOLED display looks crisp and stays readable in full sun. Pace, heart rate and route data show clearly on that screen. It lasts 13 days in smartwatch mode and 20 h with GPS on. Playing music over Bluetooth cuts battery life to about 6 to 7 hours in tests. It is 12.9 mm thick, so it sits a little higher on the wrist. Dual-frequency GPS keeps tracks clean near buildings and under tree cover, and crash detection adds a safety net. ANT+ support works with heart rate straps and bike sensors. It suits a runner who trains most days, wants a readiness score each morning, and does not play music on the run.

Compare Garmin Forerunner 265 with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Garmin Forerunner 265 and other Smartwatches

No results found