Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartwatches Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v3.0

Garmin Forerunner 255 review: 127 specs compared

Avg. price:~£?Screen size:1.3 inchBattery life:14 daysDisplay type:MIP LCD

Garmin Forerunner 255 Review: Compare 127 technical specifications, 30 expert and video reviews and 3 best-of lists to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

Garmin Forerunner 255
8.4/10

Overall score

Score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

35%

8.3

Technical score

30%

8.1

List score

25%

8.7

Reviews score

10%

8.9

Sentiment score

★Better than 94% of smartwatches
?

Value for money

Value for money
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.4

Overall score

30%

?

Price

Price not known yet
8.3

Technical score

Technical score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

24%

8.5

Health

21%

9.9

Fitness

16%

7.7

Battery

14%

8.4

Smart features

12%

8.6

Connectivity

9%

7.2

Display & Design

4%

1.3

Hardware

★Better than 90%
8.7

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.5 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10

80%

8.7

Average grade

20%

8.7

Popularity

Grades by review (30)
7 reviews + 23 videos, average 8.9/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
★Better than 97%
8.1

List score

List score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (3)
List score: in 3 of 120 lists (3%)
▲Better than 87%
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Smartwatches model ranking

Ranked #47 of 777 models in Smartwatches (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Garmin Forerunner 255

Technical score
Technical score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

24%

8.5

Health

21%

9.9

Fitness

16%

7.7

Battery

14%

8.4

Smart features

12%

8.6

Connectivity

9%

7.2

Display & Design

4%

1.3

Hardware

8.3
Reviews score
8.7
List score
8.1
Value for money
Value for money
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

8.4

Overall score

30%

?

Price

8.9
Heart rate monitor
yes
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 9.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 30.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
?
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings. 49.5% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
HRV tracking
yes
This smartwatch supports HRV tracking. 54.9% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.5% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
yes
This smartwatch includes a barometer. 46.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 28.9% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
?
Distance tracking
yes
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 3.7% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery life
14 days
This smartwatch lasts 14 days on a charge, which is longer than 73.8% of Smartwatches and the same as 9% of Smartwatches.
Battery life in training mode
30 h
This smartwatch records workouts for 30 h on a charge, which is longer than 69% of Smartwatches and the same as 6% of Smartwatches.
Battery life with GPS on
30 h
This smartwatch lasts 30 h with GPS on, which is longer than 68.4% of Smartwatches and the same as 5.7% of Smartwatches.
Battery power
?
Charge time
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Garmin OS
This smartwatch runs Garmin OS, which is more advanced than the system in 70.8% of Smartwatches and equal to 9.2% of Smartwatches.
Software update frequency
occasional
This smartwatch has occasional software update support which is more active than that of 54% of smartwatches and equal to that of 40.2% of smartwatches.
Third-party app support
yes
This smartwatch supports third-party apps. 48.5% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 16.6% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
yes
This smartwatch supports GPS. 40.3% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
yes
This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation. 56.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Dual-frequency GPS
yes
Garmin Forerunner 255 supports dual-frequency GPS. 85% of Smartwatches offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen size
1.3 inch
This smartwatch has a 1.3 inch screen, which is smaller than 67.1% of Smartwatches and the same as 10.8% of Smartwatches.
Display type
MIP LCD
This smartwatch uses MIP LCD, which is less advanced than the screen in 62.5% of Smartwatches and equal to 5.7% of Smartwatches.
Resolution
260x 260
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 260x260 which is lower than that of 67.1% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.9% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
?
Display brightness
?
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
?
Processor model
?
RAM
?
Internal storage
4 GB
This smartwatch has 4 GB of internal storage, which is more than 39.8% of Smartwatches and equal to 25.5% of Smartwatches.
External memory slot
no
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Garmin Forerunner 255 vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • Temperature sensing
    This smartwatch includes a temperature sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 31.9% of smartwatches include a temperature sensor.
  • Crash detection capability
    This smartwatch supports crash detection, the average smartwatch does not. 14% of smartwatches support crash detection.
  • HRV tracking
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 45.2% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • 7 days longer battery life
    This smartwatch runs longer per charge than the average smartwatch (14 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    14 days vs 7 days
  • Maps support
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 34.4% of smartwatches support maps.
  • More advanced operating system
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Garmin OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Garmin OS vs Proprietary OS
  • Emergency SOS
    This smartwatch includes Emergency SOS, the average smartwatch does not. 44.8% of smartwatches include Emergency SOS.
  • NFC functionality
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 45.6% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • 24.3% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.5 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    80%

    8.7

    Average grade

    20%

    8.7

    Popularity

    Grades by review (30)
    7 reviews + 23 videos, average 8.9/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.7 vs 7.0
  • 18.7% higher sentiment score
    8.9 vs 7.5
  • 14.5% better value for money
    Garmin Forerunner 255 has a higher value-for-money score than the average smartwatch (8.89 vs 7.8).
    8.89 vs 7.76
  • Temperature sensing
    This smartwatch includes a temperature sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 31.9% of smartwatches include a temperature sensor.
  • HRV tracking
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 45.2% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • Weight tracking
    This smartwatch supports weight tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 41.9% of smartwatches support weight tracking.
  • Water intake tracking
    This smartwatch tracks water intake, the average smartwatch does not. 44.1% of smartwatches track water intake.
  • Perspiration monitoring
    This smartwatch tracks perspiration, the average smartwatch does not. 15.1% of smartwatches track perspiration.
  • External heart rate monitor support
    This smartwatch supports external heart rate monitor compatibility, the average smartwatch does not. 46.6% of smartwatches support external heart rate monitor compatibility.
  • 7 days longer battery life
    This smartwatch runs longer per charge than the average smartwatch (14 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    14 days vs 7 days
  • 10 h longer training battery life
    This smartwatch lasts longer in training mode than the average smartwatch (30 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h in training mode.
    30 h vs 20 h
  • 9 h longer GPS battery life
    This smartwatch lasts longer with GPS on than the average smartwatch (30 h vs 21 h). The average smartwatch lasts 21 h with GPS on.
    30 h vs 21 h
  • Maps support
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 34.4% of smartwatches support maps.
  • NFC functionality
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 45.6% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • Supports ANT+
    This smartwatch supports ANT+, the average smartwatch does not. 13% of smartwatches support ANT+.
  • Supports dual-frequency GPS
    Garmin Forerunner 255 supports dual-frequency GPS, while the average smartwatch does not. 15.1% of Smartwatches support dual-frequency GPS.
  • Galileo satellite support
    This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation, the average smartwatch does not. 43.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
  • Stronger display glass
    This smartwatch uses Corning Gorilla Glass 3 display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 3 vs mineral glass
  • Crash detection capability
    This smartwatch supports crash detection, the average smartwatch does not. 14% of smartwatches support crash detection.
  • More advanced operating system
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Garmin OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Garmin OS vs Proprietary OS
  • Emergency SOS
    This smartwatch includes Emergency SOS, the average smartwatch does not. 44.8% of smartwatches include Emergency SOS.
  • More frequent updates
    This smartwatch receives occasional software updates, while the average smartwatch receives ended updates.
    occasional vs ended
  • No speaker
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.7% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.
  • More basic display
    This smartwatch uses a more basic screen than the average smartwatch (MIP LCD vs AMOLED).
    MIP LCD vs AMOLED
  • No ambient light sensor
    This smartwatch does not include an ambient light sensor, the average smartwatch does. 63.5% of smartwatches include an ambient light sensor.
  • 1 fewer microphones
    This smartwatch has fewer microphones than the average smartwatch (0 vs 1). The average smartwatch has 1 microphones.
    0 vs 1
  • Basic battery type
    This smartwatch uses a Li-ion battery, while the average smartwatch uses Li-Po.
    Li-ion vs Li-Po
  • 1.3 mm thicker
    This smartwatch is thicker than the average smartwatch (13 mm vs 11.7 mm). The average smartwatch is 11.7 mm thick.
    13 mm vs 11.7 mm
  • 0.1 inch smaller display
    This smartwatch has a smaller screen than the average smartwatch (1.3 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch has a 1.4 inch screen.
    1.3 inch vs 1.4 inch
  • No smart alarm
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 50.6% of smartwatches support smart alarms.
  • Basic battery type
    This smartwatch uses a Li-ion battery, while the average smartwatch uses Li-Po.
    Li-ion vs Li-Po
  • More basic display
    This smartwatch uses a more basic screen than the average smartwatch (MIP LCD vs AMOLED).
    MIP LCD vs AMOLED
  • No ambient light sensor
    This smartwatch does not include an ambient light sensor, the average smartwatch does. 63.5% of smartwatches include an ambient light sensor.
  • 1.3 mm thicker
    This smartwatch is thicker than the average smartwatch (13 mm vs 11.7 mm). The average smartwatch is 11.7 mm thick.
    13 mm vs 11.7 mm
  • 0.1 inch smaller display
    This smartwatch has a smaller screen than the average smartwatch (1.3 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch has a 1.4 inch screen.
    1.3 inch vs 1.4 inch
  • Lower resolution
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 260x260, while the average smartwatch reaches 360x360.
    260x260 vs 360x360
  • 3.5 mm wider case
    This smartwatch has a wider case than the average smartwatch (46 mm vs 42.5 mm). The average smartwatch measures 42.5 mm across.
    46 mm vs 42.5 mm
  • 4 g heavier
    This smartwatch is heavier than the average smartwatch (49 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    49 g vs 45.0 g
  • No smart alarm
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 50.6% of smartwatches support smart alarms.
  • No speaker
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.7% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.
  • 1 fewer microphones
    This smartwatch has fewer microphones than the average smartwatch (0 vs 1). The average smartwatch has 1 microphones.
    0 vs 1

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.5
Crank and Cadence
≈ estimated
04/03/2026
Long-term test · 9 months of daily use
Verdict
Garmin Forerunner 255 is reliable and well rounded for running, and the best value for most runners despite minor quirks.
9.0
SimplyPrimal
≈ estimated
15/04/2025
Review · two weeks of trail, bike and water use
Verdict
Garmin Forerunner 255 is a good pick for budget-minded fitness users who don't need a touchscreen or maps, especially the music version.
9.0
Gauging Gadgets
≈ estimated
09/05/2023
Unboxing and review · a couple of months of daily use
Verdict
Garmin Forerunner 255 holds up well with good build quality, though GPS activities noticeably cut battery life.
9.0
Yuenny Lam
≈ estimated
11/04/2023
Long-term review · 3 months of daily use
Verdict
Garmin Forerunner 255 is comfortable, light and feature-rich, and is expected to last for years despite charger and water issues.
9.5
Matt LeGrand
≈ estimated
15/01/2023
Long-term test · six months of use
Verdict
Garmin Forerunner 255 is a fantastic watch that is not perfect, with a durable build and accurate data.
9.0
Gauging Gadgets
≈ estimated
02/12/2022
Full walkthrough · menus, activities, battery and settings
Verdict
Garmin Forerunner 255 earns a strong recommendation: comfortable and accurate, with gesture notifications and battery as minor drawbacks.
9.0
FORDY RUNS
≈ estimated
28/06/2022
Hands-on review · everyday running use
Verdict
Garmin Forerunner 255 is strongly recommended as a top running watch, with everything runners need.
9.5
Run With My Dog
≈ estimated
19/06/2022
Hands-on review · GPS, heart rate and pool swim tests
Verdict
Garmin Forerunner 255 is easy to recommend, with all-round features at this price and only minor gaps such as maps.
9.0
DesFit
≈ estimated
01/06/2022
Hands-on review · health, sports and heart rate tests
Verdict
Garmin Forerunner 255 is pricier than the 245, but a big upgrade that performs well, especially against the 745.
9.0
Chase the Summit
≈ estimated
01/06/2022
Hands-on review · a few weeks of use, compared with the 245
Verdict
Garmin Forerunner 255 is a solid upgrade over the 245 with a good balance of price and features.
9.5
Matt LeGrand
≈ estimated
01/06/2022
Hands-on review · two weeks of running, swimming and cycling
Verdict
Garmin Forerunner 255 is great value for runners and triathletes, with accurate GPS and heart rate tracking.
9.5
DC Rainmaker
≈ estimated
01/06/2022
Hands-on review · GPS, heart rate and multisport tests
Verdict
Garmin Forerunner 255 offers good value for the money, with accurate GPS and heart rate tracking in most sports.
More graded video reviews (4)
creator’s own scoreestimated by us

What reviewers agree on

Based on 7 · 11

Accurate tracking and excellent multisport modes impress, but navigation is basic and many feel it is poor value.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

7.0
tomsguide.com
≈ estimated
12/02/2026
Buying advice · Multisport watch
Verdict
The Garmin Forerunner 255 still tracks workouts accurately, but its older screen and missing features make the newer Forerunner 265 the better choice.
9.0
mystylegrid.com
≈ estimated
09/01/2026
Hands-on test · Triathlon running watch
Verdict
The Garmin Forerunner 255 is a reliable pick for runners and triathletes who value accurate GPS and recovery insights, but it has no touchscreen.
8.0
runmorph.com
✓ explicit
11/08/2026
Field test · Running GPS watch
Verdict
The Garmin Forerunner 255 is a precise GPS running watch for regular runners and amateur triathletes who don't need maps, but its battery drops fast in multi-band mode.
9.0
regalosydetalles.es
≈ estimated
25/07/2026
Long-term test · Running watch
Verdict
The Garmin Forerunner 255 is a light, accurate running watch with 12 to 14 days of battery, but its button-only controls and dull indoor screen feel dated.
9.0
ultratrail.it
≈ estimated
01/06/2026
Review · Trail running watch
Verdict
The Garmin Forerunner 255 is a solid trail and ultra watch with reliable multi-band GPS and barometric altitude, but it is not built for high-altitude expeditions.
8.8
hardlopendnederland.nl
✓ explicit
11/06/2026
Multi-week test · Running and triathlon
Verdict
The Garmin Forerunner 255 is a strong pick for serious runners and triathletes who want detailed training load and recovery analysis, but casual runners may not need it.

Third-party reviews

What we like about Garmin Forerunner 255

  • Battery lasts 14 days, and GPS mode runs 30 h.
  • Triathlon mode switches sport in one activity.
  • Dual-frequency GPS keeps tracks clean in cities and forests.
  • At 49 g, it is nearly forgotten on the wrist.
  • The heart rate reads close to a chest strap.
  • Crash detection is built in.
  • Buttons work with gloves in the cold.

What we don't like about Garmin Forerunner 255

  • No touchscreen, only five physical buttons.
  • Multi-band GPS cuts the battery to about 16 h in tests.
  • The MIP screen is less vivid than AMOLED.
  • At 46 mm wide and 13 mm thick, it is bulky on slim wrists.
  • Music storage is only on the Music version.

Verdict

Multisport support and a long battery life make the Garmin Forerunner 255 stand out. Battery life is 14 days, and it runs 30 h with GPS on. In tests, it lasted a full week with an hour of running a day. Multi-band GPS holds a clean track under trees and between tall buildings. Triathlon mode switches sport in one activity, and open-water swim tracking is included. The heart rate reads close to a chest strap, with few gaps. The MIP screen stays clear in direct sun, but it is less vivid than AMOLED. The trade-off is that the watch has no touchscreen, only five buttons. It suits a serious multisport athlete who wants long battery life and accurate tracks in cities and forests. Casual runners should look elsewhere.

Compare Garmin Forerunner 255 with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Garmin Forerunner 255 and other Smartwatches

No results found