Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Canon EOS 500D Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£70Sensor size:APS-CWeight:520 gBattery life (CIPA):400 shots

Canon EOS 500D Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

4.9

Overall score

Score
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

4.4

Technical score

10%

8.9

User score

▼Worse than 63% of cameras
4.4

Technical score

Technical score
4.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

5.4

Sensor & Image

25%

3.7

Photo Features

18%

3.4

Video & Audio

14%

5.3

Display & Design

8%

5.6

Battery & Power

7%

2.6

Connectivity & Storage

▼Worse than 74% of cameras
8.9

User score

User score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.9

User ratings

30%

8.9

Number of reviews

Based on 620 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
★Better than 91% of cameras
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Canon EOS 500D

Technical score
Technical score
4.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

5.4

Sensor & Image

25%

3.7

Photo Features

18%

3.4

Video & Audio

14%

5.3

Display & Design

8%

5.6

Battery & Power

7%

2.6

Connectivity & Storage

4.4
User score
User score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.9

User ratings

30%

8.9

Number of reviews

Based on 620 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.9
Popularity
Popularity
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Canon EOS 500D has a popularity score of 8.9, which is higher than 83.8% of cameras.
8.9
Value for money
Value for money
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

4.9

Overall score

40%

10

Price

6.4
Sensor size
APS-C
Sensor size
APS-C
This camera uses a sensor classified as APS-C; it is larger than the sensor in 57.4% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 25.7% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
15.1 MP
Main camera megapixels
15.1 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 15.1 MP, which is lower than that of 72.2% of cameras and equal to that of 0.1% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
4.69 µm
Main camera pixel size
4.69 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 4.69 µm, which are larger than those in 76.6% of cameras and the same size as those in 0.1% of cameras.
Base ISO
100
Base ISO
100
This camera has a base ISO of 100 which is higher than that of 19.9% of cameras and equal to that of 52.4% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 3200 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 3,200
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 3,200, which is lower than that of 62.9% of cameras and equal to that of 22.7% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
Canon EF/EF-S
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
9
N. of focus points
9
This camera has 9 focus points, fewer than the number offered by 67.1% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 26% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
yes
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
yes
This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.3% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
no
AF tracking
no
This camera does not support AF tracking. 88.1% of cameras support this feature.
Show more
Max video resolution
1920 px
Max video resolution
1920 px
This camera supports 1920 px video recording which is higher quality than that of 28.7% of cameras and equal to that of 47.1% of cameras.
Video bitrate
44 Mbps
Video bitrate
44 Mbps
This camera has a video bitrate of 44 Mbps which is higher than that of 65.3% of cameras and equal to that of 0.8% of cameras.
Video bit depth
8 bit
Video bit depth
8 bit
This camera supports video at 8 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 80.6% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
This camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 69.9% of cameras.
Video codecs
H.264
Show more
Type
dslr
Weight
520 g
Weight
520 g
This camera weighs 520 g which is heavier than 65.4% of cameras.
Width
128.8 mm
Width
128.8 mm
This camera has a width of 128.8 mm which is wider than 68.8% of cameras and equal to that of 0.2% of cameras.
Height
97.5 mm
Height
97.5 mm
This camera has a height of 97.5 mm which is taller than 79.9% of cameras and equal to that of 1% of cameras.
Thickness
61.9 mm
Thickness
61.9 mm
This camera has a thickness of 61.9 mm which is thicker than 58.3% of cameras and equal to that of 0.2% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
400 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
400 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 400 shots, which is longer than that of 66.9% of cameras and equal to that of 3.5% of cameras.
Battery capacity
1,080 mAh
Battery capacity
1,080 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 1,080 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 52.9% of cameras and equal to those in 1.9% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This camera does not support Wi-Fi. 47.9% of cameras include this feature.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Canon EOS 500D vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • Phase-detect AF for photos
    Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
    yes
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos, the average camera does not.
  • Sensor cleaning system
    Sensor cleaning system
    yes
    This camera includes a sensor cleaning system, the average camera does not.
    EOS Integrated Cleaning System.
  • 1.35 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    4.69 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (4.7 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    4.69 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    optical
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (optical vs none).
    Pentamirror optical viewfinder.
    optical vs none
  • Lossless compressed RAW
    Lossless compressed RAW
    yes
    This camera supports lossless compressed RAW, while the average camera does not.
    Standard RAW is losslessly compressed.
  • 70 shots more shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    400 shots
    This camera has longer battery life than the average camera (400 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    400 shots vs 330 shots
  • 4.14x cheaper
    Canon EOS 500D is cheaper than the average camera (£70 vs £290).
    £70 vs £290
  • 10.9% higher user score
    User score
    8.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Canon EOS 500D
    the average camera
    Canon EOS 500D has a higher user score than the average camera (8.87 vs 8.000).
    8.87 vs 8
  • 4.14x cheaper
    Canon EOS 500D is cheaper than the average camera (£70 vs £290).
    £70 vs £290
  • 10.9% higher user score
    User score
    8.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Canon EOS 500D
    the average camera
    Canon EOS 500D has a higher user score than the average camera (8.87 vs 8.000).
    8.87 vs 8
  • 4.61x more popular
    Canon EOS 500D is more popular than the average camera (8.89 vs 1.9).
    8.89 vs 1.93
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    optical
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (optical vs none).
    Pentamirror optical viewfinder.
    optical vs none
  • 0.09 x more viewfinder magnification
    Viewfinder magnification
    0.87 x
    This camera has a higher viewfinder magnification than the average camera (0.9 x vs 0.78 x). The average camera has a viewfinder magnification of 0.78 x.
    0.87 x vs 0.78 x
  • Sensor cleaning system
    Sensor cleaning system
    yes
    This camera includes a sensor cleaning system, the average camera does not.
    EOS Integrated Cleaning System.
  • 1.35 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    4.69 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (4.7 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    4.69 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • Phase-detect AF for photos
    Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
    yes
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos, the average camera does not.
  • Lossless compressed RAW
    Lossless compressed RAW
    yes
    This camera supports lossless compressed RAW, while the average camera does not.
    Standard RAW is losslessly compressed.
  • 14 Mbps higher video bitrate
    Video bitrate
    44 Mbps
    This camera has a higher video bitrate than the average camera (44 Mbps vs 30 Mbps). The average camera records at 30 Mbps.
    44 Mbps vs 30 Mbps
  • 70 shots more shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    400 shots
    This camera has longer battery life than the average camera (400 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    400 shots vs 330 shots
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    -0.5
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (-0.5 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    -0.5 vs -4
  • No AF tracking
    AF tracking
    no
    This camera does not support AF tracking, the average camera does. 88% of cameras support it.
  • 5 % lower viewfinder coverage
    Viewfinder coverage
    95 %
    This camera has a lower viewfinder coverage than the average camera (95 % vs 100 %). The average camera has viewfinder coverage of 100 %.
    95 % vs 100 %
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2
  • 2.3 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    3.4 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (3.4 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    3.4 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    15.1 MP
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (15.1 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    15.1 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 5 % lower viewfinder coverage
    Viewfinder coverage
    95 %
    This camera has a lower viewfinder coverage than the average camera (95 % vs 100 %). The average camera has viewfinder coverage of 100 %.
    95 % vs 100 %
  • 125 g heavier
    Weight
    520 g
    This camera is heavier than the average camera (520 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    520 g vs 395 g
  • 23.6 mm taller body
    Height
    97.5 mm
    This camera is taller than the average camera (97.5 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    97.5 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 8.9 mm wider
    Width
    128.8 mm
    This camera is wider than the average camera (128.8 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    128.8 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • 15.9 mm thicker
    Thickness
    61.9 mm
    This camera is thicker than the average camera (61.9 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    61.9 mm vs 46 mm
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    15.1 MP
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (15.1 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    15.1 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 1.3 points lower DxOMark Portrait score
    DxOMark portrait score
    21.7 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark portrait score than the average camera (21.7 points vs 23 points). The average camera scores 23.0 points.
    21.7 points vs 23.0 points
  • 10 points lower DxOMark sensor score
    DxOMark sensor score
    63 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sensor score than the average camera (63 points vs 73 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sensor score of 73 points.
    63 points vs 73 points
  • 0.9 points lower DxOMark Landscape score
    DxOMark landscape score
    11.5 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark landscape score than the average camera (11.5 points vs 12.4 points). The average camera scores 12.4 points.
    11.5 points vs 12.4 points
  • 3,200 ISO lower maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    3,200 ISO
    This camera has a lower maximum sensitivity than the average camera (3200 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    3,200 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • 4 older
    Release date
    2009
    This camera is older than the average camera (2009 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    April 2009
    2,009 vs 2,013
  • 180 points lower DxOMark Sports score
    DxOMark sports score
    663 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sports score than the average camera (663 points vs 843 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sports score of 843 points.
    663 points vs 843 points
  • 12,500 ISO lower extended sensitivity limit
    Max expanded ISO
    12,800 ISO
    This camera has a lower expanded ISO than the average camera (12800 ISO vs 25300 ISO). The average camera reaches an expanded ISO of 25300 ISO.
    12,800 ISO vs 25,300 ISO
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    -0.5
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (-0.5 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    -0.5 vs -4
  • No AF tracking
    AF tracking
    no
    This camera does not support AF tracking, the average camera does. 88% of cameras support it.
  • 2.3 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    3.4 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (3.4 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    3.4 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 14 fewer AF points
    N. of focus points
    9
    This camera has fewer focus points than the average camera (9 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    9 vs 23
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2
  • Older HDMI version
    HDMI version
    1.3
    This camera uses HDMI 1.3, while the average camera uses HDMI 1.4.
    1.3 vs 1.4

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

D
dpreview.com
08/06/2009
Summary of the review
C
cnet.com
12/05/2009
Summary of the review
W
whatdigitalcamera.com
30/04/2009
Summary of the review
T
the-digital-picture.com
22/05/2009
Summary of the review
T
trustedreviews.com
05/11/2009
Summary of the review
P
photozone.de
21/10/2026
Summary of the review
W
wired.com
03/06/2009
Summary of the review
K
kenrockwell.com
21/10/2026
Summary of the review
D
digital-photography-school.com
15/08/2011
Summary of the review
P
photocrati.com
17/08/2009
Summary of the review
J
juzaphoto.com
21/10/2026
Summary of the review
D
dpinterface.com
10/05/2009
Summary of the review
I
imaging-resource.com
25/03/2009
Summary of the review
C
cameralabs.com
18/11/2011
Summary of the review
D
digitalkamera.de
26/05/2009
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
04/05/2009
Summary of the review
N
n-tv.de
14/05/2009
Summary of the review
D
dkamera.de
20/05/2009
Summary of the review
N
neunzehn72.de
27/06/2009
Summary of the review
W
welt.de
07/06/2009
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
14/04/2009
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
28/05/2009
Summary of the review
D
dailymotion.com
03/07/2009
Summary of the review
P
photoetmac.com
22/06/2009
Summary of the review
P
photoexposition.fr
25/02/2018
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
27/05/2009
Summary of the review
D
dxomark.fr
08/06/2009
Summary of the review
M
muycomputer.com
13/05/2009
Summary of the review
J
javipas.com
24/09/2009
Summary of the review
R
radojuva.com
27/12/2012
Summary of the review
F
fotografidigitali.it
07/09/2009
Summary of the review
J
juzaphoto.com
30/05/2009
Summary of the review
F
fotografiastore.it
21/10/2026
Summary of the review
F
fotografidigitali.it
07/09/2009
Summary of the review
P
photofacts.nl
29/07/2009
Summary of the review
E
eoszine.nl
28/03/2009
Summary of the review
C
cursus-fotografie.nl
2009 (approx.)
Summary of the review
R
radojuva.com
27/12/2012
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 620 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Canon EOS 500D

  • High-resolution 3.0-inch LCD screen (920k dots) provides excellent clarity for image playback
  • Responsive and snappy overall performance with minimal shutter lag
  • Very affordable second-hand option, making it an ideal entry-level DSLR for beginners
  • Extensive lens compatibility via the Canon EF/EF-S mount
  • Intuitive menu system with a customisable 'My Menu' for quick access to frequently used settings
  • Compact and lightweight build compared to pro-level DSLRs

What we don't like about Canon EOS 500D

  • Full HD (1080p) video recording is limited to a low frame rate of 20fps
  • Autofocus is slow compared to modern cameras and can be noisy during video recording
  • Lacks an external microphone jack and manual exposure controls for movie mode
  • Limited high ISO performance leads to grainy images in low-light conditions
  • Viewfinder is relatively small and basic compared to higher-end models
  • Small body size may feel awkward or cramped for users with larger hands

Verdict

The Canon EOS 500D (Rebel T1i) is a versatile entry-level DSLR featuring a 15.1-megapixel APS-C CMOS sensor paired with a DIGIC 4 image processor, offering a native ISO range of 100–3200 (expandable to 12800) and 3.4 fps continuous shooting. It stands out for its high-resolution 3.0-inch 920k-dot LCD screen and its then-pioneering ability to record Full HD 1080p video (at 20 fps) or 720p (at 30 fps). Main pros include its lightweight, compact design, responsive user interface, and overall excellent still image quality for its class. However, notable cons include a relatively small viewfinder, a low frame rate for Full HD video, and the lack of a dedicated autofocus assist lamp, relying instead on the pop-up flash.

Compare Canon EOS 500D with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Canon EOS 500D and other products in the Cameras category

No results found