Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Canon EOS 1000D Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£70Sensor size:APS-CWeight:502 gBattery life (CIPA):500 shots

Canon EOS 1000D Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

4.7

Overall score

Score
4.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

4.3

Technical score

10%

8.5

User score

▼Worse than 69% of cameras
4.3

Technical score

Technical score
4.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

5.3

Sensor & Image

25%

4.6

Photo Features

18%

2.3

Video & Audio

14%

4.0

Display & Design

8%

6.7

Battery & Power

7%

2.0

Connectivity & Storage

▼Worse than 78% of cameras
8.5

User score

User score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.7

User ratings

30%

7.9

Number of reviews

Based on 187 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▲Better than 80% of cameras
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Canon EOS 1000D

Technical score
Technical score
4.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

5.3

Sensor & Image

25%

4.6

Photo Features

18%

2.3

Video & Audio

14%

4.0

Display & Design

8%

6.7

Battery & Power

7%

2.0

Connectivity & Storage

4.3
User score
User score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.7

User ratings

30%

7.9

Number of reviews

Based on 187 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.5
Popularity
Popularity
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Canon EOS 1000D has a popularity score of 7.9, which is higher than 74.7% of cameras.
7.9
Value for money
Value for money
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

4.7

Overall score

40%

10

Price

6.3
Sensor size
APS-C
Sensor size
APS-C
This camera uses a sensor classified as APS-C; it is larger than the sensor in 57.4% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 25.7% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
10.1 MP
Main camera megapixels
10.1 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 10.1 MP, which is lower than that of 96.5% of cameras and equal to that of 1.3% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
5.71 µm
Main camera pixel size
5.71 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 5.71 µm, which are larger than those in 88.4% of cameras.
Base ISO
100
Base ISO
100
This camera has a base ISO of 100 which is higher than that of 19.9% of cameras and equal to that of 52.4% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 1600 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 1,600
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 1,600, which is lower than that of 85.9% of cameras and equal to that of 13.2% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
Canon EF/EF-S
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
7
N. of focus points
7
This camera has 7 focus points, fewer than the number offered by 93.3% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 0.2% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
yes
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
yes
This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.3% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
AF tracking
yes
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 88% of cameras.
Show more
Max video resolution
N/A
Video bitrate
N/A
Video bit depth
N/A
Video chroma subsampling
N/A
Video codecs
N/A
Show more
Type
dslr
Weight
502 g
Weight
502 g
This camera weighs 502 g which is heavier than 63% of cameras.
Width
126.1 mm
Width
126.1 mm
This camera has a width of 126.1 mm which is wider than 64.4% of cameras.
Height
97.5 mm
Height
97.5 mm
This camera has a height of 97.5 mm which is taller than 79.9% of cameras and equal to that of 1% of cameras.
Thickness
61.9 mm
Thickness
61.9 mm
This camera has a thickness of 61.9 mm which is thicker than 58.3% of cameras and equal to that of 0.2% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
500 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
500 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 500 shots, which is longer than that of 79.1% of cameras and equal to that of 3.6% of cameras.
Battery capacity
1,080 mAh
Battery capacity
1,080 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 1,080 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 52.9% of cameras and equal to those in 1.9% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This camera does not support Wi-Fi. 47.9% of cameras include this feature.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Canon EOS 1000D vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • Phase-detect AF for photos
    Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
    yes
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos, the average camera does not.
  • 2.37 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    5.71 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (5.7 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    5.71 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • Sensor cleaning system
    Sensor cleaning system
    yes
    This camera includes a sensor cleaning system, the average camera does not.
    Self-cleaning sensor unit.
  • 170 shots more shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    500 shots
    This camera has longer battery life than the average camera (500 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    500 shots vs 330 shots
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    optical
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (optical vs none).
    Pentamirror optical viewfinder.
    optical vs none
  • 4.14x cheaper
    Canon EOS 1000D is cheaper than the average camera (£70 vs £290).
    £70 vs £290
  • 5.7% higher user score
    User score
    8.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Canon EOS 1000D
    the average camera
    Canon EOS 1000D has a higher user score than the average camera (8.46 vs 8.000).
    8.46 vs 8
  • 4.14x cheaper
    Canon EOS 1000D is cheaper than the average camera (£70 vs £290).
    £70 vs £290
  • 5.7% higher user score
    User score
    8.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Canon EOS 1000D
    the average camera
    Canon EOS 1000D has a higher user score than the average camera (8.46 vs 8.000).
    8.46 vs 8
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    optical
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (optical vs none).
    Pentamirror optical viewfinder.
    optical vs none
  • 2.37 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    5.71 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (5.7 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    5.71 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • Sensor cleaning system
    Sensor cleaning system
    yes
    This camera includes a sensor cleaning system, the average camera does not.
    Self-cleaning sensor unit.
  • Phase-detect AF for photos
    Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
    yes
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos, the average camera does not.
  • 170 shots more shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    500 shots
    This camera has longer battery life than the average camera (500 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    500 shots vs 330 shots
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    -0.5
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (-0.5 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    -0.5 vs -4
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    10.1 MP
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (10.1 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    10.1 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 0.5 in smaller screen diagonal
    Screen size
    2.5 in
    This camera has a smaller screen than the average camera (2.5 in vs 3 in). The average camera has a screen size of 3 in.
    2.5 in vs 3 in
  • 5 % lower viewfinder coverage
    Viewfinder coverage
    95 %
    This camera has a lower viewfinder coverage than the average camera (95 % vs 100 %). The average camera has viewfinder coverage of 100 %.
    95 % vs 100 %
  • 2 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    0
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (0 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    0 vs 2
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
    no video recording
  • 0.5 in smaller screen diagonal
    Screen size
    2.5 in
    This camera has a smaller screen than the average camera (2.5 in vs 3 in). The average camera has a screen size of 3 in.
    2.5 in vs 3 in
  • 5 % lower viewfinder coverage
    Viewfinder coverage
    95 %
    This camera has a lower viewfinder coverage than the average camera (95 % vs 100 %). The average camera has viewfinder coverage of 100 %.
    95 % vs 100 %
  • 107 g heavier
    Weight
    502 g
    This camera is heavier than the average camera (502 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    502 g vs 395 g
  • 23.6 mm taller body
    Height
    97.5 mm
    This camera is taller than the average camera (97.5 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    97.5 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 6.2 mm wider
    Width
    126.1 mm
    This camera is wider than the average camera (126.1 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    126.1 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • 15.9 mm thicker
    Thickness
    61.9 mm
    This camera is thicker than the average camera (61.9 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    61.9 mm vs 46 mm
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    10.1 MP
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (10.1 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    10.1 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • 1.5 points lower DxOMark Landscape score
    DxOMark landscape score
    10.9 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark landscape score than the average camera (10.9 points vs 12.4 points). The average camera scores 12.4 points.
    10.9 points vs 12.4 points
  • 4,800 ISO lower maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    1,600 ISO
    This camera has a lower maximum sensitivity than the average camera (1600 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    1,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • 11 points lower DxOMark sensor score
    DxOMark sensor score
    62 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sensor score than the average camera (62 points vs 73 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sensor score of 73 points.
    62 points vs 73 points
  • 1 points lower DxOMark Portrait score
    DxOMark portrait score
    22.0 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark portrait score than the average camera (22 points vs 23 points). The average camera scores 23.0 points.
    22.0 points vs 23.0 points
  • 5 older
    Release date
    2008
    This camera is older than the average camera (2008 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    June 2008
    2,008 vs 2,013
  • 124 points lower DxOMark Sports score
    DxOMark sports score
    719 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sports score than the average camera (719 points vs 843 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sports score of 843 points.
    719 points vs 843 points
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    -0.5
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (-0.5 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    -0.5 vs -4
  • 2.7 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    3 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (3 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    3 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 16 fewer AF points
    N. of focus points
    7
    This camera has fewer focus points than the average camera (7 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    7 vs 23
  • 2 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    0
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (0 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    0 vs 2
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
    no video recording
  • No HDMI output
    HDMI output
    no
    This camera does not support HDMI output, the average camera does. 78.7% of cameras support HDMI output.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

D
dpreview.com
22/07/2008
Summary of the review
C
cnet.com
10/09/2008
Summary of the review
W
whatdigitalcamera.com
01/09/2008
Summary of the review
P
photoreview.com.au
15/07/2008
Summary of the review
S
skyatnightmagazine.com
20/01/2012
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
07/08/2008
Summary of the review
T
the-digital-picture.com
28/05/2009
Summary of the review
R
radojuva.com
10/10/2013
Summary of the review
D
digitalkamera.de
03/09/2008
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
29/07/2008
Summary of the review
G
gradias.de
21/10/2026
Summary of the review
M
morgenpost.de
20/09/2008
Summary of the review
C
connect-living.de
08/04/2011
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
05/08/2008
Summary of the review
L
lmscope.com
01/07/2013
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
08/08/2008
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
08/08/2008
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
19/08/2008
Summary of the review
D
dailymotion.com
10/06/2008
Summary of the review
D
dailymotion.com
03/08/2008
Summary of the review
P
photographiesdelannee.com
25/12/2025
Summary of the review
L
lmscope.com
01/07/2013
Summary of the review
M
monappareilphotopro.fr
14/01/2026
Summary of the review
R
radojuva.com
10/10/2013
Summary of the review
F
fotocamerapro.it
13/09/2016
Summary of the review
F
fotografiastore.it
Anno presentazione 2008
Summary of the review
P
photofacts.nl
11/08/2008
Summary of the review
F
fotografie.nl
16/09/2008
Summary of the review
E
eoszine.nl
17/01/2009
Summary of the review
D
digitalefotografievakantie.nl
Onbekend
Summary of the review
D
digifotopro.nl
11/07/2008
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 187 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Canon EOS 1000D

  • Extremely affordable entry point for beginners in photography
  • Lightweight and compact body, ideal for travel and street photography
  • Intuitive menu system and user-friendly controls for first-time DSLR users
  • Produces high-quality images with good dynamic range for its class
  • Compatible with a wide range of EF and EF-S lenses
  • Excellent battery life for long shooting sessions

What we don't like about Canon EOS 1000D

  • Build quality feels overly 'plasticky' and less durable than higher-end models
  • Maximum ISO is limited to 1,600, leading to poor low-light performance by modern standards
  • Lack of video recording capabilities, which is standard in newer entry-level cameras
  • Very slow continuous shooting (burst) speed, especially when shooting in RAW
  • Autofocus system is basic with only 7 points and can be slow in dim lighting
  • Small 2.5-inch LCD screen can be difficult to view in bright sunlight

Verdict

The Canon EOS 1000D is an entry-level DSLR featuring a 10.1-megapixel APS-C CMOS sensor, a DIGIC III image processor, and a 7-point wide-area autofocus system. Key specifications include an ISO range of 100–1600, a 2.5-inch LCD with Live View, and continuous shooting speeds of up to 3.0 fps for JPEGs. Its main pros are its lightweight, compact 450g body, high-quality image output for its class, and excellent battery life of up to 600 shots. Main cons include a sluggish 1.5 fps RAW burst rate, the absence of spot metering, a lack of native video recording, and a plastic construction that can feel somewhat flimsy.

Compare Canon EOS 1000D with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Canon EOS 1000D and other products in the Cameras category

No results found