Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Polaroid Snap Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£170Sensor size:1/3.2"Weight:215 gBattery life (CIPA):?

Polaroid Snap Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

3.8

Overall score

Score
3.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

3.2

Technical score

10%

9.0

User score

▼Worse than 97% of cameras
3.2

Technical score

Technical score
3.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

3.9

Sensor & Image

25%

1.0

Photo Features

18%

2.5

Video & Audio

14%

6.2

Display & Design

8%

4.9

Battery & Power

7%

2.0

Connectivity & Storage

▼Worse than 99% of cameras
9.0

User score

User score
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.5

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on 16,554 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
★Better than 92% of cameras
  • polaroid-snap
polaroid-snap

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Polaroid Snap

Technical score
Technical score
3.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

3.9

Sensor & Image

25%

1.0

Photo Features

18%

2.5

Video & Audio

14%

6.2

Display & Design

8%

4.9

Battery & Power

7%

2.0

Connectivity & Storage

3.2
User score
User score
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.5

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on 16,554 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
9.0
Popularity
Popularity
10.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Polaroid Snap has a popularity score of 10, which is higher than 91.7% of cameras.
10
Value for money
Value for money
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

3.8

Overall score

40%

9.6

Price

5.5
Sensor size
1/3.2"
Sensor size
1/3.2"
This camera uses a sensor classified as 1/3.2"; it is smaller than the sensor in 99.5% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 0.1% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
10 MP
Main camera megapixels
10 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 10 MP, which is lower than that of 97.9% of cameras and equal to that of 0.8% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
1.4 µm
Main camera pixel size
1.4 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 1.4 µm, which are smaller than those in 73% of cameras and the same size as those in 0.2% of cameras.
Base ISO
50
Base ISO
50
This camera has a base ISO of 50 which is lower than that of 99.3% of cameras and equal to that of 0.7% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 400 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 400
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 400, which is lower than that of 99.8% of cameras and equal to that of 0.2% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
N/A
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
N/A
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
This camera does not support phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.5% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
no
AF tracking
no
This camera does not support AF tracking. 88.1% of cameras support this feature.
Show more
Max video resolution
N/A
Video bitrate
N/A
Video bit depth
N/A
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
This camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 69.9% of cameras.
Video codecs
N/A
Show more
Type
instant
Weight
215 g
Weight
215 g
This camera weighs 215 g which is lighter than 75.4% of cameras and equal to the weight of 0.5% of cameras.
Width
120 mm
Width
120 mm
This camera has a width of 120 mm which is wider than 50.3% of cameras and equal to that of 1.4% of cameras.
Height
75 mm
Height
75 mm
This camera has a height of 75 mm which is taller than 51.2% of cameras and equal to that of 0.1% of cameras.
Thickness
25 mm
Thickness
25 mm
This camera has a thickness of 25 mm which is thinner than 85.6% of cameras and equal to that of 0.4% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
?
Battery capacity
1,100 mAh
Battery capacity
1,100 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 1,100 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 51.6% of cameras and equal to those in 1.2% of cameras.
Removable battery
no
Removable battery
no
This camera lacks a removable battery, while 98.8% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This camera does not support Wi-Fi. 47.9% of cameras include this feature.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Data and power.
Show more

Polaroid Snap vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    optical
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (optical vs none).
    optical vs none
  • 180 g lighter
    Weight
    215 g
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (215 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    215 g vs 395 g
  • 0.22 x more viewfinder magnification
    Viewfinder magnification
    1 x
    This camera has a higher viewfinder magnification than the average camera (1 x vs 0.78 x). The average camera has a viewfinder magnification of 0.78 x.
    1 x vs 0.78 x
  • 21 mm thinner
    Thickness
    25 mm
    This camera is thinner than the average camera (25 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    25 mm vs 46 mm
  • 12.2% higher user score
    User score
    9.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Polaroid Snap
    the average camera
    Polaroid Snap has a higher user score than the average camera (8.97 vs 8.000).
    8.97 vs 8
  • 2 newer
    Release date
    2015
    This camera is newer than the average camera (2015 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    September 2015
    2,015 vs 2,013
  • 5.18x more popular
    Polaroid Snap is more popular than the average camera (10 vs 1.9).
    10 vs 1.93
  • 12.2% higher user score
    User score
    9.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Polaroid Snap
    the average camera
    Polaroid Snap has a higher user score than the average camera (8.97 vs 8.000).
    8.97 vs 8
  • 5.18x more popular
    Polaroid Snap is more popular than the average camera (10 vs 1.9).
    10 vs 1.93
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    optical
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (optical vs none).
    optical vs none
  • 180 g lighter
    Weight
    215 g
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (215 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    215 g vs 395 g
  • 0.22 x more viewfinder magnification
    Viewfinder magnification
    1 x
    This camera has a higher viewfinder magnification than the average camera (1 x vs 0.78 x). The average camera has a viewfinder magnification of 0.78 x.
    1 x vs 0.78 x
  • 21 mm thinner
    Thickness
    25 mm
    This camera is thinner than the average camera (25 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    25 mm vs 46 mm
  • 2 newer
    Release date
    2015
    This camera is newer than the average camera (2015 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    September 2015
    2,015 vs 2,013
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    1/3.2"
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1/3.2" vs APS-C).
    1/3.2" vs APS-C
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    10 MP
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (10 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    10 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • No AF tracking
    AF tracking
    no
    This camera does not support AF tracking, the average camera does. 88% of cameras support it.
  • 5.1 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    0.6 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (0.6 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    0.6 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 2 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    0
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (0 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    0 vs 2
  • 1.94 µm smaller sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    1.4 µm
    This camera has smaller sensor pixels than the average camera (1.4 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    1.4 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
    no video recording
  • 12.2% worse value for money
    Polaroid Snap has a worse value-for-money score than the average camera (5.53 vs 6.2).
    5.53 vs 6.2
  • No hot shoe
    Hot shoe
    no
    This camera does not have a hot shoe, the average camera does.
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    1/3.2"
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1/3.2" vs APS-C).
    1/3.2" vs APS-C
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    10 MP
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (10 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    10 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • 1.94 µm smaller sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    1.4 µm
    This camera has smaller sensor pixels than the average camera (1.4 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    1.4 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 6,000 ISO lower maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    400 ISO
    This camera has a lower maximum sensitivity than the average camera (400 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    400 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • No AF tracking
    AF tracking
    no
    This camera does not support AF tracking, the average camera does. 88% of cameras support it.
  • 5.1 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    0.6 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (0.6 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    0.6 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • No RAW photo capture
    RAW photo capture
    no
    This camera does not support RAW photo capture, the average camera does. 62.8% of cameras support RAW formats.
  • No manual focus mode
    Manual focus
    no
    This camera does not support manual focus, the average camera does. 71.7% of cameras include a manual focus mode.
    Fixed-focus design.
  • No manual exposure control
    Manual exposure
    no
    This camera does not support manual exposure, the average camera does. 72% of cameras support manual exposure controls.
  • No two-stage shutter
    Two-stage shutter button
    no
    This camera does not have a two-stage shutter button, the average camera does.
  • 29.9 s shorter maximum exposure
    Longest shutter speed
    0.1 s
    This camera supports a shorter maximum exposure than the average camera (0.1 s s vs 30 s s). The average camera supports a longest shutter speed of 30 s s.
    0.1 s vs 30 s
  • 85.9% less optical zoom
    Optical zoom
    1 x
    40% less optical zoom: this camera offers 1 x, compared with 7.1 x on the average camera.
    The fixed built-in lens has no optical zoom range, equivalent to 1x.
    1 x vs 7.1 x
  • 2 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    0
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (0 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    0 vs 2
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
    no video recording
  • No removable battery
    Removable battery
    no
    This camera does not have a removable battery, while the average camera does.
  • No HDMI output
    HDMI output
    no
    This camera does not support HDMI output, the average camera does. 78.7% of cameras support HDMI output.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

C
cnet.com
03/02/2016
Summary of the review
S
slrlounge.com
03/05/2016
Summary of the review
E
ephotozine.com
27/01/2016
Summary of the review
T
techadvisor.com
29/05/2018
Summary of the review
T
techgearlab.com
04/06/2019
Summary of the review
C
casualphotophile.com
07/11/2015
Summary of the review
I
imore.com
22/11/2019
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
03/05/2016
Summary of the review
T
thegroyne.com
01/03/2016
Summary of the review
W
weloversize.com
10/10/2022
Summary of the review
O
ocu.org
19/04/2016
Summary of the review
F
fotocamerapro.it
30/03/2017
Summary of the review
F
fotografiamoderna.it
05/01/2025
Summary of the review
M
macitynet.it
04/09/2015
Summary of the review
G
gewoon-nienke.nl
01/01/2020
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 16,554 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Polaroid Snap

  • Simple and intuitive 'point-and-shoot' operation, making it user-friendly for kids and beginners
  • Saves digital copies of every photo to a microSD card for later sharing or backup
  • Uses ZINK (Zero Ink) technology, which eliminates the need for expensive ink cartridges
  • Pocket-sized and lightweight design for easy portability during travel
  • Inexpensive compared to other instant cameras, and the sticky-back ZINK paper is relatively affordable
  • Includes fun shooting modes like black-and-white, sepia, and a photo-booth style mode

What we don't like about Polaroid Snap

  • Overall image and print quality is lower than modern smartphones and some analog instant cameras
  • Lack of manual flash control; the auto-flash cannot be manually toggled off
  • No built-in LCD screen for previewing shots (unlike the Snap Touch model)
  • Rechargeable battery is built-in and not user-replaceable
  • Every photo is printed automatically if paper is loaded, leading to potential waste of expensive paper
  • Slow printing process, taking about a full minute for a physical print to emerge

Verdict

The Polaroid Snap is a 10MP compact instant digital camera featuring a 1/3.2" CMOS sensor and a fixed 3.4mm f/2.8 lens (25.8mm equivalent) that utilizes Zink Zero Ink technology to produce 2x3-inch smudge-proof, adhesive-backed prints in under a minute. Key characteristics include a pop-up optical viewfinder that doubles as a power switch, three color modes (normal, black and white, and vintage sepia), a 10-second self-timer, and a microSD slot supporting up to 32GB for digital storage. Its main pros are the pocket-sized, battery-rechargeable design that offers simultaneous digital saving and physical printing at a relatively low cost compared to traditional film. However, significant cons include underwhelming image quality that falls short of modern smartphones, a lack of a rear LCD screen for framing or reviewing shots, and the inability to select which photos to print, as the camera automatically prints every captured image when paper is loaded.

Compare Polaroid Snap with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Polaroid Snap and other products in the Cameras category

No results found