OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Cameras Methodology v3.0
Cameras Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Cameras Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Cameras Methodology v3.0

Kodak Mini Shot 2 Retro review: 112 specs compared

Avg. price:~£110Sensor size:1/2.3"Weight:255 gBattery life (CIPA):?

Kodak Mini Shot 2 Retro Review: Compare 112 technical specifications and 11 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

Kodak Mini Shot 2 Retro
6.1/10

Overall score

Score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
Score components

35%

4.1

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

8.1

Reviews score

10%

4.1

Sentiment score

â–¼Worse than 57% of cameras
7.3

Value for money

Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 70% of models
Score components

70%

6.1

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

â–²Better than 70%
4.1

Technical score

Technical score
4.1/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
Score components

28%

4.2

Sensor & Image

25%

4.1

Photo Features

18%

2.8

Video & Audio

14%

3.5

Display & Design

8%

5.8

Battery & Power

7%

6.6

Connectivity & Storage

â–¼Worse than 82%
8.1

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.5 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 60% of models

80%

8.3

Average grade

20%

7.5

Popularity

Grades by review (11)
11 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–²Better than 60%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • kodak-mini-shot-2-retro
  • kodak-mini-shot-2-retro
  • kodak-mini-shot-2-retro
  • kodak-mini-shot-2-retro
  • kodak-mini-shot-2-retro
  • kodak-mini-shot-2-retro
  • kodak-mini-shot-2-retro
  • kodak-mini-shot-2-retro
  • kodak-mini-shot-2-retro
  • kodak-mini-shot-2-retro
  • kodak-mini-shot-2-retro
kodak-mini-shot-2-retro
kodak-mini-shot-2-retro
kodak-mini-shot-2-retro
kodak-mini-shot-2-retro
kodak-mini-shot-2-retro
kodak-mini-shot-2-retro
kodak-mini-shot-2-retro
kodak-mini-shot-2-retro
kodak-mini-shot-2-retro
kodak-mini-shot-2-retro
kodak-mini-shot-2-retro
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the Kodak Mini Shot 2 Retro

Based on 0 · 11

The app and print quality win praise, but reviewers dislike limited storage, slow printing and weak camera images.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading category ranking...

Cameras model ranking

Ranked #246 of 975 models in Cameras (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of camera Kodak Mini Shot 2 Retro

Technical score
Technical score
4.1/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
Score components:

28%

4.2

Sensor & Image

25%

4.1

Photo Features

18%

2.8

Video & Audio

14%

3.5

Display & Design

8%

5.8

Battery & Power

7%

6.6

Connectivity & Storage

4.1
Reviews score
8.1
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 70% of models
Score components:

70%

6.1

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

7.3
Sensor size
1/2.3"
This camera has a sensor size of 1/2.3", which is smaller than 59.1% of cameras and the same as 39.1% of cameras.
Sensor resolution
10 MP
This camera captures images at 10 MP, which is lower than 97.1% of cameras and equal to 1% of cameras.
Sensor pixel size
1.68 µm
Market range: <1.33 µm – >5.94 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 1.68 µm, which are smaller than those in 59.5% of cameras and the same size as those in 0.4% of cameras.
Base ISO
100
Market range: <80 – >200
This camera has a base ISO of 100, which is lower than 26.7% of cameras and equal to 53.4% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 1600 ISO
This camera reaches ISO 1,600, which is lower than 85.6% of cameras and equal to 13.3% of cameras.
Show more
What reviewers say
Lens mount
N/A
Built-in focus motor
N/A
N. of focus points
9
Market range: <9 – >399
This camera has a focus-point count of 9, which is lower than 66.3% of cameras and equal to 26.2% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
This camera does not support phase-detection autofocus for photos. 36.6% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 87.4% of cameras.
Show more
What reviewers say
Max video resolution
N/A
Video bitrate
N/A
Video bit depth
N/A
Video chroma subsampling
N/A
Video codecs
N/A
Show more
Type
instant
Weight
255 g
Market range: <142 g – >812 g
This camera weighs 255 g, which is lighter than 66.6% of cameras and equal to 0.1% of cameras.
Width
132.4 mm
Market range: <96 mm – >142.6 mm
This camera is 132.4 mm wide, which is wider than 77.4% of cameras.
Height
78.2 mm
Market range: <57.6 mm – >105.8 mm
This camera is 78.2 mm tall, which is taller than 54.2% of cameras.
Thickness
25.8 mm
Market range: <21.9 mm – >92 mm
This camera is 25.8 mm thick, which is thinner than 84.9% of cameras.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery life (CIPA)
?
Battery capacity
850 mAh
Market range: <700 mAh – >2.2k mAh
This camera has 850 mAh battery capacity, which is smaller than 82.4% of cameras and equal to 0.5% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 97.8% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.6% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This camera supports Wi-Fi. This feature is available on 48.1% of cameras.
Wi-Fi version
?
Bluetooth connectivity
yes
This camera has Bluetooth. 24% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
yes
This camera features USB Type-C. 16.3% of cameras use USB-C ports.
Show more
What reviewers say

Kodak Mini Shot 2 Retro vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • Has USB Type-C
    This camera has a USB Type-C port, the average camera does not. 16.4% of cameras use USB-C.
  • Has Bluetooth
    This camera supports Bluetooth, the average camera does not. 24.1% of cameras support Bluetooth.
  • Supports Wi-Fi connectivity
    This camera supports Wi-Fi, the average camera does not. 48.1% of cameras support Wi-Fi.
  • 24.6% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.5 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 60% of models

    80%

    8.3

    Average grade

    20%

    7.5

    Popularity

    Grades by review (11)
    11 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.1 vs 6.5
  • Smartphone remote control
    This camera supports smartphone remote control, the average camera does not. 46.2% of cameras support smartphone remote control.
  • 134.5 g lighter
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (255 g vs 389.5 g). The average camera weighs 389.5 g.
    255 g vs 389.5 g
  • 20.1 mm thinner
    This camera is thinner than the average camera (25.8 mm vs 45.9 mm). The average camera is 45.9 mm thick.
    25.8 mm vs 45.9 mm
  • In-camera panorama mode
    This camera includes an in-camera panorama mode, the average camera does not.
  • 24.6% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.5 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 60% of models

    80%

    8.3

    Average grade

    20%

    7.5

    Popularity

    Grades by review (11)
    11 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.1 vs 6.5
  • 2.64x cheaper
    Kodak Mini Shot 2 Retro is cheaper than the average camera (£110 vs £290).
    £110 vs £290
  • 134.5 g lighter
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (255 g vs 389.5 g). The average camera weighs 389.5 g.
    255 g vs 389.5 g
  • 20.1 mm thinner
    This camera is thinner than the average camera (25.8 mm vs 45.9 mm). The average camera is 45.9 mm thick.
    25.8 mm vs 45.9 mm
  • In-camera panorama mode
    This camera includes an in-camera panorama mode, the average camera does not.
  • Has USB Type-C
    This camera has a USB Type-C port, the average camera does not. 16.4% of cameras use USB-C.
  • Has Bluetooth
    This camera supports Bluetooth, the average camera does not. 24.1% of cameras support Bluetooth.
  • Supports Wi-Fi connectivity
    This camera supports Wi-Fi, the average camera does not. 48.1% of cameras support Wi-Fi.
  • Smartphone remote control
    This camera supports smartphone remote control, the average camera does not. 46.2% of cameras support smartphone remote control.
  • Smaller image sensor
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1/2.3" vs 2/3"). The average camera's sensor size is 2/3".
    1/2.3" vs 2/3"
  • Fewer megapixels
    This camera has fewer megapixels than the average camera (10 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera's sensor resolution is 16.2 MP.
    10 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 1.3 in smaller screen
    This camera has a smaller screen than the average camera (1.7 in vs 3 in). The average camera has a screen of 3 in.
    1.7 in vs 3 in
  • Lacks HDR mode
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • No hot shoe
    This camera does not have a hot shoe, the average camera does.
  • No RAW photo capture
    This camera does not support RAW photo capture, the average camera does. 61% of cameras support RAW formats.
  • 43.1% lower sentiment score
    4.1 vs 7.2
  • 4,800 ISO lower maximum sensitivity
    This camera reaches a lower maximum ISO than the average camera (1,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO). The average camera's maximum ISO is 6,400 ISO.
    1,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • 43.1% lower sentiment score
    4.1 vs 7.2
  • 1.3 in smaller screen
    This camera has a smaller screen than the average camera (1.7 in vs 3 in). The average camera has a screen of 3 in.
    1.7 in vs 3 in
  • No hot shoe
    This camera does not have a hot shoe, the average camera does.
  • 13.4 mm wider
    This camera is wider than the average camera (132.4 mm vs 119 mm). The average camera is 119 mm wide.
    132.4 mm vs 119 mm
  • Smaller image sensor
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1/2.3" vs 2/3"). The average camera's sensor size is 2/3".
    1/2.3" vs 2/3"
  • Fewer megapixels
    This camera has fewer megapixels than the average camera (10 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera's sensor resolution is 16.2 MP.
    10 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • Lacks HDR mode
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • 4,800 ISO lower maximum sensitivity
    This camera reaches a lower maximum ISO than the average camera (1,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO). The average camera's maximum ISO is 6,400 ISO.
    1,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • 1.36 µm smaller sensor pixels
    This camera has smaller sensor pixels than the average camera (1.7 µm vs 3.04 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.04 µm.
    1.68 µm vs 3.04 µm
  • No RAW photo capture
    This camera does not support RAW photo capture, the average camera does. 61% of cameras support RAW formats.
  • 14 fewer focus points
    This camera has a lower focus-point count than the average camera (9 vs 23). The average camera has a count of 23.
    9 vs 23
  • No manual focus mode
    This camera does not support manual focus, the average camera does. 71.4% of cameras include a manual focus mode.
  • No manual exposure control
    This camera does not support manual exposure, the average camera does. 71.5% of cameras support manual exposure controls.
  • 84.6% less optical zoom
    This camera offers less optical zoom than the average camera (1 x vs 6.5 x). The average camera offers 6.5 x.
    1 x vs 6.5 x
  • 270 mAh less battery capacity
    This camera has a smaller battery than the average camera (850 mAh vs 1,120 mAh). The average camera has 1,120 mAh battery capacity.
    850 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • No HDMI output
    This camera does not support HDMI output, the average camera does. 77.7% of cameras support HDMI output.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Discovering Nearby Tech
≈ estimated
11/02/2023
Hands-on review · bought unit, printing and app tests
Verdict
The Kodak Mini Shot 2 Retro offers good value for printing photos, with acceptable camera quality and a basic build.
9.0
The Review Dad
≈ estimated
04/02/2023
Unboxing and hands-on review · printing and app tests
Verdict
The Kodak Mini Shot 2 Retro is a fun little camera with strong prints, and it is easy to recommend.
8.0
Just Another Chris
≈ estimated
21/07/2022
Hands-on review · about two months of use
Verdict
Kodak Mini Shot 2 Retro suits indoor fun with good prints, but not outdoor or fast shooting.
9.0
MARLONPTY REVIEWS
≈ estimated
12/07/2022
Unboxing and hands-on review · bundle, print quality, app
Verdict
Kodak Mini Shot 2 Retro is great value as a two-in-one bundle, though its shots are not the clearest.
9.0
NReluctant
≈ estimated
25/06/2021
Hands-on review · printing and app test
Verdict
Kodak Mini Shot 2 Retro is one of the best instant photo printers, with crisp colour and easy phone printing.
8.0
Daniel Sin
≈ estimated
28/07/2022
Short hands-on review · printing, camera and charging
Verdict
Kodak Mini Shot 2 Retro makes the most sense as a printer, with a handy camera for keepsake moments.
Brand video
Hands-on video, no verdict
Not graded
Overview video
Not graded

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Kodak Mini Shot 2 Retro

  • At 255 g it is easy to carry all day.
  • At 25.8 mm thick it slides into a pocket.
  • Bluetooth connects it to a phone.
  • Pictures print on the spot.
  • Base ISO 100 keeps bright-light shots clean.

What customers don't like about Kodak Mini Shot 2 Retro

  • The 1.7 in screen is small for framing shots.
  • The 1 x zoom means you must walk closer to your subject.
  • The top ISO of 1600 limits shooting in dim rooms.
  • There is no manual exposure, so the camera sets everything.

Verdict

Slim and light, the Kodak Mini Shot 2 Retro slips into a coat pocket or a small handbag. At 25.8 mm thick and 255 g, you barely notice it on a day out. Bluetooth links it to a phone, a handy extra for a camera this simple. Each picture is recorded digitally and printed on the spot, so the results come out in your hand. The limits are a small 1.7 in screen, a 1 x zoom and a top ISO of 1600, so it works well in daylight and at close range. There is no manual exposure, so the camera picks the settings and you just point and shoot. It suits anyone who wants a light, playful camera for daytime fun.

Compare Kodak Mini Shot 2 Retro with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Kodak Mini Shot 2 Retro and other products in the Cameras category

No results found