Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Canon EOS 5D Mark II Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£230Sensor size:full frameWeight:920 gBattery life (CIPA):850 shots

Canon EOS 5D Mark II Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

5.7

Overall score

Score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

5.4

Technical score

10%

8.5

User score

▲Better than 64% of cameras
5.4

Technical score

Technical score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

6.6

Sensor & Image

25%

4.8

Photo Features

18%

4.2

Video & Audio

14%

4.7

Display & Design

8%

8.8

Battery & Power

7%

2.6

Connectivity & Storage

▲Better than 61% of cameras
8.5

User score

User score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.3

User ratings

30%

8.8

Number of reviews

Based on 632 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▲Better than 80% of cameras
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Canon EOS 5D Mark II

Technical score
Technical score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

6.6

Sensor & Image

25%

4.8

Photo Features

18%

4.2

Video & Audio

14%

4.7

Display & Design

8%

8.8

Battery & Power

7%

2.6

Connectivity & Storage

5.4
User score
User score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.3

User ratings

30%

8.8

Number of reviews

Based on 632 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.5
Popularity
Popularity
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Canon EOS 5D Mark II has a popularity score of 8.8, which is higher than 82.8% of cameras.
8.8
Value for money
Value for money
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

5.7

Overall score

40%

9.3

Price

6.8
Sensor size
full frame
Sensor size
full frame
This camera uses a sensor classified as full frame; it is larger than the sensor in 83.7% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 14% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
21.1 MP
Main camera megapixels
21.1 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 21.1 MP, which is higher than that of 74.8% of cameras and equal to that of 0.1% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
6.41 µm
Main camera pixel size
6.41 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 6.41 µm, which are larger than those in 96.3% of cameras.
Base ISO
100
Base ISO
100
This camera has a base ISO of 100 which is higher than that of 19.9% of cameras and equal to that of 52.4% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 6400 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 6,400
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 6,400, which is higher than that of 37.3% of cameras and equal to that of 16.2% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
Canon EF
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
9
N. of focus points
9
This camera has 9 focus points, fewer than the number offered by 67.1% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 26% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
yes
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
yes
This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.3% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
AF tracking
yes
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 88% of cameras.
Show more
Max video resolution
1920 px
Max video resolution
1920 px
This camera supports 1920 px video recording which is higher quality than that of 28.7% of cameras and equal to that of 47.1% of cameras.
Video bitrate
38 Mbps
Video bitrate
38 Mbps
This camera has a video bitrate of 38 Mbps which is higher than that of 60.3% of cameras and equal to that of 2.9% of cameras.
Video bit depth
8 bit
Video bit depth
8 bit
This camera supports video at 8 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 80.6% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
This camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 69.9% of cameras.
Video codecs
H.264
Show more
Type
dslr
Weight
920 g
Weight
920 g
This camera weighs 920 g which is heavier than 93.9% of cameras and equal to the weight of 0.3% of cameras.
Width
152 mm
Width
152 mm
This camera has a width of 152 mm which is wider than 95.9% of cameras and equal to that of 0.3% of cameras.
Height
113.5 mm
Height
113.5 mm
This camera has a height of 113.5 mm which is taller than 94% of cameras and equal to that of 0.1% of cameras.
Thickness
75 mm
Thickness
75 mm
This camera has a thickness of 75 mm which is thicker than 69.3% of cameras and equal to that of 0.3% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
850 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
850 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 850 shots, which is longer than that of 93% of cameras and equal to that of 0.1% of cameras.
Battery capacity
1,800 mAh
Battery capacity
1,800 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 1,800 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 78.6% of cameras and equal to those in 3.3% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This camera does not support Wi-Fi. 47.9% of cameras include this feature.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Canon EOS 5D Mark II vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • Phase-detect AF for photos
    Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
    yes
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos, the average camera does not.
  • 3.07 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    6.41 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (6.4 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    6.41 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 520 shots more shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    850 shots
    This camera has longer battery life than the average camera (850 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    850 shots vs 330 shots
  • Has microphone input
    Microphone input
    yes
    This camera has microphone input, the average camera does not.
    3.5 mm mic input
  • Sensor cleaning system
    Sensor cleaning system
    yes
    This camera includes a sensor cleaning system, the average camera does not.
    EOS Integrated Cleaning System.
  • Larger sensor
    Sensor size
    full frame
    This camera has a larger sensor than the average camera (full frame vs APS-C).
    full frame vs APS-C
  • 680 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    1,800 mAh
    This camera has a higher battery capacity than the average camera (1800 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    1,800 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • Higher sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    21.1 MP
    This camera has a higher sensor resolution than the average camera (21.1 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    21.1 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 5.8% higher user score
    User score
    8.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Canon EOS 5D Mark II
    the average camera
    Canon EOS 5D Mark II has a higher user score than the average camera (8.47 vs 8.000).
    8.47 vs 8
  • 4.58x more popular
    Canon EOS 5D Mark II is more popular than the average camera (8.84 vs 1.9).
    8.84 vs 1.93
  • 9.1% better value for money
    Canon EOS 5D Mark II has a better value-for-money score than the average camera (6.76 vs 6.2).
    6.76 vs 6.2
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    optical
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (optical vs none).
    Pentaprism optical viewfinder.
    optical vs none
  • 3 more customizable buttons
    Customizable button count
    3
    This camera has more customizable buttons than the average camera (3 vs 0). The average camera offers 0 customizable buttons.
    3 vs 0
  • 3.07 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    6.41 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (6.4 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    6.41 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • Larger sensor
    Sensor size
    full frame
    This camera has a larger sensor than the average camera (full frame vs APS-C).
    full frame vs APS-C
  • Sensor cleaning system
    Sensor cleaning system
    yes
    This camera includes a sensor cleaning system, the average camera does not.
    EOS Integrated Cleaning System.
  • Higher sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    21.1 MP
    This camera has a higher sensor resolution than the average camera (21.1 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    21.1 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 972 points higher DxOMark Sports score
    DxOMark sports score
    1,815 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark sports score than the average camera (1815 points vs 843 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sports score of 843 points.
    1,815 points vs 843 points
  • 0.7 points higher DxOMark Portrait score
    DxOMark portrait score
    23.7 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark portrait score than the average camera (23.7 points vs 23 points). The average camera scores 23.0 points.
    23.7 points vs 23.0 points
  • 6 points higher DxOMark sensor score
    DxOMark sensor score
    79 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark sensor score than the average camera (79 points vs 73 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sensor score of 73 points.
    79 points vs 73 points
  • Phase-detect AF for photos
    Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
    yes
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos, the average camera does not.
  • Lossless compressed RAW
    Lossless compressed RAW
    yes
    This camera supports lossless compressed RAW, while the average camera does not.
    Lossless RAW capture is supported.
  • 50,000 more shutter cycles
    Shutter durability rating
    150,000
    This camera has a higher shutter durability than the average camera (150,000 vs 100,000). The average camera is rated for 100,000 shutter cycles.
    150,000 vs 100,000
  • Has microphone input
    Microphone input
    yes
    This camera has microphone input, the average camera does not.
    3.5 mm mic input
  • Supports 24p cinema mode
    24p cinema mode
    yes
    This camera supports 24p cinema mode, the average camera does not. 44% of cameras support this mode.
    via firmware update
  • 520 shots more shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    850 shots
    This camera has longer battery life than the average camera (850 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    850 shots vs 330 shots
  • 680 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    1,800 mAh
    This camera has a higher battery capacity than the average camera (1800 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    1,800 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • More versatile card slots
    Memory card slot types
    CF
    This camera uses more versatile card slots than the average camera (CF vs SD). The average camera supports SD memory card slot types.
    CF vs SD
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    -0.5
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (-0.5 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    -0.5 vs -4
  • 525 g heavier
    Weight
    920 g
    This camera is heavier than the average camera (920 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    920 g vs 395 g
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
    button-press refocus only
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2
  • 2 % lower viewfinder coverage
    Viewfinder coverage
    98 %
    This camera has a lower viewfinder coverage than the average camera (98 % vs 100 %). The average camera has viewfinder coverage of 100 %.
    98 % vs 100 %
  • 1.8 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    3.9 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (3.9 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    3.9 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 14 fewer AF points
    N. of focus points
    9
    This camera has fewer focus points than the average camera (9 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    9 vs 23
  • 525 g heavier
    Weight
    920 g
    This camera is heavier than the average camera (920 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    920 g vs 395 g
  • 2 % lower viewfinder coverage
    Viewfinder coverage
    98 %
    This camera has a lower viewfinder coverage than the average camera (98 % vs 100 %). The average camera has viewfinder coverage of 100 %.
    98 % vs 100 %
  • No flash
    Flash
    no
    This camera does not have a built-in flash, the average camera does. 73.4% of cameras have a flash.
  • 39.6 mm taller body
    Height
    113.5 mm
    This camera is taller than the average camera (113.5 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    113.5 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 32.1 mm wider
    Width
    152 mm
    This camera is wider than the average camera (152 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    152 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • 0.07 x less viewfinder magnification
    Viewfinder magnification
    0.71 x
    This camera has a lower viewfinder magnification than the average camera (0.7 x vs 0.78 x). The average camera has a viewfinder magnification of 0.78 x.
    0.71 x vs 0.78 x
  • 29 mm thicker
    Thickness
    75 mm
    This camera is thicker than the average camera (75 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    75 mm vs 46 mm
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • 5 older
    Release date
    2008
    This camera is older than the average camera (2008 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    November 2008
    2,008 vs 2,013
  • 0.5 points lower DxOMark Landscape score
    DxOMark landscape score
    11.9 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark landscape score than the average camera (11.9 points vs 12.4 points). The average camera scores 12.4 points.
    11.9 points vs 12.4 points
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    -0.5
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (-0.5 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    -0.5 vs -4
  • 14 fewer AF points
    N. of focus points
    9
    This camera has fewer focus points than the average camera (9 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    9 vs 23
  • 1.8 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    3.9 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (3.9 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    3.9 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
    button-press refocus only
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2
  • Older HDMI version
    HDMI version
    1.3
    This camera uses HDMI 1.3, while the average camera uses HDMI 1.4.
    1.3 vs 1.4

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

D
dpreview.com
13/02/2009
Summary of the review
T
the-digital-picture.com
13/01/2009
Summary of the review
K
kenrockwell.com
01/11/2008
Summary of the review
P
popphoto.com
26/08/2009
Summary of the review
R
reviewed.com
11/08/2009
Summary of the review
W
wired.com
09/11/2009
Summary of the review
C
cameralegend.com
22/02/2015
Summary of the review
A
alexcoghe.com
02/08/2024
Summary of the review
V
vishvish.com
15/10/2024
Summary of the review
A
all-things-photography.com
01/11/2009
Summary of the review
P
photoreview.com.au
17/12/2008
Summary of the review
R
rolandlim.wordpress.com
23/12/2008
Summary of the review
P
photocrati.com
06/10/2009
Summary of the review
R
rangefinderonline.com
01/07/2009
Summary of the review
C
cnet.com
09/10/2012
Summary of the review
D
dpreview.com
17/09/2024
Summary of the review
D
digitalkamera.de
18/12/2008
Summary of the review
P
photoscala.de
12/01/2009
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
27/09/2011
Summary of the review
D
dkamera.de
01/03/2022
Summary of the review
B
berndmargotte.com
Keine Angabe
Summary of the review
F
fotohits.de
01/11/2009
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
21/01/2009
Summary of the review
S
studio-plus.fr
04/04/2026
Summary of the review
P
photoexposition.fr
25/02/2018
Summary of the review
S
shots.fr
28/10/2009
Summary of the review
C
cnetfrance.fr
11/03/2009
Summary of the review
P
phototrend.fr
27/01/2026
Summary of the review
0
01net.com
21/01/2009
Summary of the review
J
juliogm.wordpress.com
04/03/2010
Summary of the review
M
marcotogni.it
21/10/2026
Summary of the review
O
osservatoriodigitale.it
21/10/2026
Summary of the review
F
fotografiastore.it
21/10/2026
Summary of the review
F
fotocamerapro.it
29/05/2014
Summary of the review
P
photofacts.nl
17/02/2011
Summary of the review
F
focus-review.com
01/09/2011
Summary of the review
E
eoszine.nl
02/03/2009
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
16/12/2014
Summary of the review
D
digifotopro.nl
12/02/2013
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 632 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Canon EOS 5D Mark II

  • Exceptional image quality with 21.1MP full-frame resolution and pleasing color reproduction
  • Rugged, weather-resistant magnesium alloy build quality described as 'tank-like'
  • Excellent high ISO performance for its era, delivering usable results up to ISO 3200-6400
  • Large, high-resolution 3-inch LCD screen (920k dots) for clear image review
  • Impressive battery life, often lasting a full day of shooting on a single charge
  • Pioneering 1080p Full HD video capabilities that remains usable for cinematic projects

What we don't like about Canon EOS 5D Mark II

  • Outdated 9-point autofocus system, with only the center point being consistently reliable
  • Slow continuous shooting speed (3.9 fps), making it poorly suited for sports or wildlife
  • Limited dynamic range compared to modern sensors, particularly in highlight recovery
  • Lack of modern features like dual card slots, Wi-Fi, or a touchscreen
  • Heavier and bulkier body compared to contemporary mirrorless alternatives
  • Slow contrast-detect autofocus in Live View mode

Verdict

The Canon EOS 5D Mark II is a landmark full-frame DSLR featuring a 21.1-megapixel CMOS sensor and the DIGIC 4 processor, famously known as the first EOS camera to offer Full HD 1080p video recording at 30fps. Its primary characteristics include an ISO range of 100–6400 (expandable from 50 to 25,600), a 9-point autofocus system with 6 assist points, and a 3.0-inch 920k-dot VGA LCD. Main pros consist of its exceptional image quality with high resolution and impressive low-light performance, a rugged magnesium alloy build with environmental sealing, and its historical role in democratising cinematic filmmaking. However, it has notable cons, such as a relatively slow continuous shooting speed of 3.9 fps, an aging autofocus system that lacks the sophistication of newer models, and limited video features like mono-only internal audio and a lack of continuous autofocus during filming.

Compare Canon EOS 5D Mark II with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Canon EOS 5D Mark II and other products in the Cameras category

No results found