Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Nikon D3400 Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£200Sensor size:APS-CWeight:445 gBattery life (CIPA):1200 shots

Nikon D3400 Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

5.9

Overall score

Score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

5.5

Technical score

10%

9.3

User score

▲Better than 69% of cameras
5.5

Technical score

Technical score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

6.8

Sensor & Image

25%

4.8

Photo Features

18%

4.2

Video & Audio

14%

5.5

Display & Design

8%

7.5

Battery & Power

7%

3.6

Connectivity & Storage

▲Better than 64% of cameras
9.3

User score

User score
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.1

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on 2,564 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
★Better than 98% of cameras
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Nikon D3400

Technical score
Technical score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

6.8

Sensor & Image

25%

4.8

Photo Features

18%

4.2

Video & Audio

14%

5.5

Display & Design

8%

7.5

Battery & Power

7%

3.6

Connectivity & Storage

5.5
User score
User score
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.1

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on 2,564 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
9.3
Popularity
Popularity
10.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Nikon D3400 has a popularity score of 10, which is higher than 91.7% of cameras.
10
Value for money
Value for money
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

5.9

Overall score

40%

9.5

Price

7.0
Sensor size
APS-C
Sensor size
APS-C
This camera uses a sensor classified as APS-C; it is larger than the sensor in 57.4% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 25.7% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
24.2 MP
Main camera megapixels
24.2 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 24.2 MP, which is higher than that of 78% of cameras and equal to that of 5.8% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
3.92 µm
Main camera pixel size
3.92 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 3.92 µm, which are larger than those in 65.7% of cameras and the same size as those in 1.7% of cameras.
Base ISO
100
Base ISO
100
This camera has a base ISO of 100 which is higher than that of 19.9% of cameras and equal to that of 52.4% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 25600 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 25,600
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 25,600, which is higher than that of 75.6% of cameras and equal to that of 12.5% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
Nikon F
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
11
N. of focus points
11
This camera has 11 focus points, fewer than the number offered by 60.4% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 6.5% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
yes
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
yes
This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.3% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
AF tracking
yes
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 88% of cameras.
Show more
Max video resolution
1920 px
Max video resolution
1920 px
This camera supports 1920 px video recording which is higher quality than that of 28.7% of cameras and equal to that of 47.1% of cameras.
Video bitrate
36 Mbps
Video bitrate
36 Mbps
This camera has a video bitrate of 36 Mbps which is higher than that of 57.3% of cameras and equal to that of 2.6% of cameras.
Video bit depth
8 bit
Video bit depth
8 bit
This camera supports video at 8 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 80.6% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:2
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:2
This camera supports 4:2:2 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 77.9% of cameras and equal to that of 22.1% of cameras.
HDMI
Video codecs
H.264
Show more
Type
dslr
Weight
445 g
Weight
445 g
This camera weighs 445 g which is heavier than 55.9% of cameras and equal to the weight of 0.4% of cameras.
Width
124 mm
Width
124 mm
This camera has a width of 124 mm which is wider than 58.9% of cameras and equal to that of 1.9% of cameras.
Height
98 mm
Height
98 mm
This camera has a height of 98 mm which is taller than 80.9% of cameras and equal to that of 0.5% of cameras.
Thickness
75.5 mm
Thickness
75.5 mm
This camera has a thickness of 75.5 mm which is thicker than 69.9% of cameras and equal to that of 0.1% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
1,200 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
1,200 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 1,200 shots, which is longer than that of 97.6% of cameras and equal to that of 0.3% of cameras.
Battery capacity
1,230 mAh
Battery capacity
1,230 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 1,230 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 56.6% of cameras and equal to those in 0.6% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This camera does not support Wi-Fi. 47.9% of cameras include this feature.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
yes
Bluetooth connectivity
yes
This camera has Bluetooth. 22.6% of cameras support Bluetooth.
SnapBridge support.
Bluetooth version
4.1
Bluetooth version
4.1
This camera supports Bluetooth version 4.1 which is newer than that supported by 79.3% of cameras and equal to that of 6.9% of cameras.
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Nikon D3400 vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • Phase-detect AF for photos
    Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
    yes
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos, the average camera does not.
  • 19,200 ISO higher maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    25,600 ISO
    This camera has a higher maximum sensitivity than the average camera (25600 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    25,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • 870 shots more shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    1,200 shots
    This camera has longer battery life than the average camera (1200 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    1,200 shots vs 330 shots
  • Higher sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    24.2 MP
    This camera has a higher sensor resolution than the average camera (24.2 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    24.2 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • More complete chroma subsampling
    Video chroma subsampling
    4:2:2
    This camera supports better video chroma subsampling than the average camera (4:2:2 vs 4:2:0). The average camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling.
    HDMI
    4:2:2 vs 4:2:0
  • Has Bluetooth
    Bluetooth connectivity
    yes
    This camera supports Bluetooth, the average camera does not. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
    SnapBridge support.
  • 1.5 points higher DxOMark Landscape score
    DxOMark landscape score
    13.9 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark landscape score than the average camera (13.9 points vs 12.4 points). The average camera scores 12.4 points.
    13.9 points vs 12.4 points
  • 1.8 points higher DxOMark Portrait score
    DxOMark portrait score
    24.8 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark portrait score than the average camera (24.8 points vs 23 points). The average camera scores 23.0 points.
    24.8 points vs 23.0 points
  • 16.8% higher user score
    User score
    9.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Nikon D3400
    the average camera
    Nikon D3400 has a higher user score than the average camera (9.34 vs 8.000).
    9.34 vs 8
  • 5.18x more popular
    Nikon D3400 is more popular than the average camera (10 vs 1.9).
    10 vs 1.93
  • 12.3% better value for money
    Nikon D3400 has a better value-for-money score than the average camera (6.96 vs 6.2).
    6.96 vs 6.2
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    optical
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (optical vs none).
    Pentamirror optical viewfinder.
    optical vs none
  • 0.07 x more viewfinder magnification
    Viewfinder magnification
    0.85 x
    This camera has a higher viewfinder magnification than the average camera (0.9 x vs 0.78 x). The average camera has a viewfinder magnification of 0.78 x.
    0.85 x vs 0.78 x
  • 1 more customizable buttons
    Customizable button count
    1
    This camera has more customizable buttons than the average camera (1 vs 0). The average camera offers 0 customizable buttons.
    1 vs 0
  • 19,200 ISO higher maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    25,600 ISO
    This camera has a higher maximum sensitivity than the average camera (25600 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    25,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • Higher sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    24.2 MP
    This camera has a higher sensor resolution than the average camera (24.2 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    24.2 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 1.5 points higher DxOMark Landscape score
    DxOMark landscape score
    13.9 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark landscape score than the average camera (13.9 points vs 12.4 points). The average camera scores 12.4 points.
    13.9 points vs 12.4 points
  • 1.8 points higher DxOMark Portrait score
    DxOMark portrait score
    24.8 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark portrait score than the average camera (24.8 points vs 23 points). The average camera scores 23.0 points.
    24.8 points vs 23.0 points
  • 13 points higher DxOMark sensor score
    DxOMark sensor score
    86 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark sensor score than the average camera (86 points vs 73 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sensor score of 73 points.
    86 points vs 73 points
  • 0.58 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    3.92 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (3.9 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    3.92 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 3 newer
    Release date
    2016
    This camera is newer than the average camera (2016 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    August 2016
    2,016 vs 2,013
  • 349 points higher DxOMark Sports score
    DxOMark sports score
    1,192 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark sports score than the average camera (1192 points vs 843 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sports score of 843 points.
    1,192 points vs 843 points
  • Phase-detect AF for photos
    Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
    yes
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos, the average camera does not.
  • More complete chroma subsampling
    Video chroma subsampling
    4:2:2
    This camera supports better video chroma subsampling than the average camera (4:2:2 vs 4:2:0). The average camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling.
    HDMI
    4:2:2 vs 4:2:0
  • Supports 24p cinema mode
    24p cinema mode
    yes
    This camera supports 24p cinema mode, the average camera does not. 44% of cameras support this mode.
  • 870 shots more shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    1,200 shots
    This camera has longer battery life than the average camera (1200 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    1,200 shots vs 330 shots
  • Has Bluetooth
    Bluetooth connectivity
    yes
    This camera supports Bluetooth, the average camera does not. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
    SnapBridge support.
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    -1
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (-1 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    -1 vs -4
  • 5 % lower viewfinder coverage
    Viewfinder coverage
    95 %
    This camera has a lower viewfinder coverage than the average camera (95 % vs 100 %). The average camera has viewfinder coverage of 100 %.
    95 % vs 100 %
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2
  • 24.1 mm taller body
    Height
    98 mm
    This camera is taller than the average camera (98 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    98 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 0.7 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    5 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (5 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    5 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 12 fewer AF points
    N. of focus points
    11
    This camera has fewer focus points than the average camera (11 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    11 vs 23
  • 5 % lower viewfinder coverage
    Viewfinder coverage
    95 %
    This camera has a lower viewfinder coverage than the average camera (95 % vs 100 %). The average camera has viewfinder coverage of 100 %.
    95 % vs 100 %
  • 24.1 mm taller body
    Height
    98 mm
    This camera is taller than the average camera (98 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    98 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 29.5 mm thicker
    Thickness
    75.5 mm
    This camera is thicker than the average camera (75.5 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    75.5 mm vs 46 mm
  • 50 g heavier
    Weight
    445 g
    This camera is heavier than the average camera (445 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    445 g vs 395 g
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    -1
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (-1 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    -1 vs -4
  • 12 fewer AF points
    N. of focus points
    11
    This camera has fewer focus points than the average camera (11 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    11 vs 23
  • 0.7 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    5 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (5 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    5 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

D
dpreview.com
17/10/2016
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
15/08/2019
Summary of the review
K
kenrockwell.com
01/03/2017
Summary of the review
P
photographylife.com
02/07/2020
Summary of the review
P
photoreview.com.au
06/10/2016
Summary of the review
F
focus-review.com
06/01/2017
Summary of the review
E
ephotozine.com
04/10/2016
Summary of the review
C
cnet.com
16/10/2016
Summary of the review
D
digitalcameraworld.com
01/07/2017
Summary of the review
T
t3.com
06/04/2018
Summary of the review
S
shotkit.com
22/07/2022
Summary of the review
D
dslrbodies.com
05/12/2024
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
26/10/2016
Summary of the review
H
heise.de
21/10/2016
Summary of the review
D
digitalkamera.de
12/01/2017
Summary of the review
D
dkamera.de
19/01/2017
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
19/02/2017
Summary of the review
C
connect-living.de
25/11/2016
Summary of the review
F
fotohits.de
11/2016
Summary of the review
N
naturfotografie-digital.de
18/04/2017
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
02/11/2016
Summary of the review
N
nikonpassion.com
09/01/2017
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
21/11/2016
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
29/11/2016
Summary of the review
0
01net.com
31/01/2017
Summary of the review
L
leclaireur.fnac.com
20/05/2017
Summary of the review
P
photographiesdelannee.com
30/08/2025
Summary of the review
M
mcpactions.com
16/05/2017
Summary of the review
N
nikonistas.com
19/10/2016
Summary of the review
P
photolari.com
22 de noviembre de 2016
Summary of the review
T
todo-fotografia.com
Sin fecha específica
Summary of the review
P
photomaniaci.com
25/07/2018
Summary of the review
T
trekking.it
19/03/2020
Summary of the review
F
fotografiastore.it
03/10/2016
Summary of the review
A
altroconsumo.it
21/10/2026
Summary of the review
R
reflex-mania.com
11/10/2018
Summary of the review
A
alground.com
23/10/2018
Summary of the review
F
fotocamerapro.it
05/01/2017
Summary of the review
T
tuttotek.it
20/01/2018
Summary of the review
D
digifotostarter.nl
31/10/2016
Summary of the review
P
pf.nl
22/12/2016
Summary of the review
V
vivacamera.nl
19/04/2017
Summary of the review
C
consumentenbond.nl
Onbekend
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 2,564 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Nikon D3400

  • Excellent image quality with a 24.2MP sensor
  • Outstanding battery life, rated for approximately 1,200 shots
  • Lightweight and compact design, ideal for travel
  • User-friendly 'Guide Mode' designed for beginners
  • Fast and accurate autofocus when using the optical viewfinder
  • Bluetooth connectivity (SnapBridge) for easy photo transfers
  • Great value for an entry-level DSLR price

What we don't like about Nikon D3400

  • Basic 11-point autofocus system can struggle with moving subjects
  • No external microphone port for improved video audio
  • Rear LCD screen is fixed and lacks touch functionality
  • Slow autofocus performance when using Live View
  • Lacks built-in Wi-Fi, limiting remote camera control
  • Small RAW buffer depth during continuous shooting
  • Build quality feels somewhat plasticky and lacks weather sealing

Verdict

The Nikon D3400 is an entry-level DX-format DSLR featuring a 24.2-megapixel APS-C CMOS sensor with no optical low-pass filter for enhanced sharpness, powered by the EXPEED 4 image processor. It offers a native ISO range of 100–25,600, 11-point phase-detect autofocus, and 5 fps continuous shooting, alongside Full HD 1080p video recording at up to 60 fps. Key pros include its exceptionally long battery life of approximately 1,200 shots per charge, a lightweight and compact build ideal for travel, and SnapBridge Bluetooth connectivity for easy image sharing. However, notable cons include the lack of a built-in microphone jack for video, a fixed non-touchscreen LCD, and the absence of a built-in sensor cleaning mechanism.

Compare Nikon D3400 with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Nikon D3400 and other products in the Cameras category

No results found