Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Microsoft Surface Pro 3 (8GB + 512GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£160RAM capacity:8 GBInternal storage:512 GBScreen size:12 inchesChipset:Intel Core i7-4650U

Microsoft Surface Pro 3 (8GB + 512GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

6.5/10

Overall score

Score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

6.2

Technical score

10%

8.5

User score

â–²Better than 57% of tablets
7.4

Value for money

Value for money
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.5

Overall score

30%

9.7

Price

â–²Better than 61%
6.2

Technical score

Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

22%

7.6

Performance

20%

5.5

Display

16%

5.7

Camera

14%

5.3

Battery

12%

5.7

Connectivity

8%

8.5

Software & Features

5%

5.0

Design

3%

5.7

Audio & Multimedia

â–²Better than 54%
8.5

User score

User score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.2

User ratings

30%

9.3

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–²Better than 82%
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Microsoft Surface Pro 3 (8GB + 512GB)

Technical score
Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

22%

7.6

Performance

20%

5.5

Display

16%

5.7

Camera

14%

5.3

Battery

12%

5.7

Connectivity

8%

8.5

Software & Features

5%

5.0

Design

3%

5.7

Audio & Multimedia

6.2
User score
User score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.2

User ratings

30%

9.3

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.5
Popularity
Popularity
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Microsoft Surface Pro 3 (8GB + 512GB) has a user popularity of 9.3 points, which is lower than 87.4% of Tablets.
9.3
Value for money
Value for money
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

6.5

Overall score

30%

9.7

Price

7.4
RAM capacity
8 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 8 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 72.3% of tablets and equal to that of 17.8% of tablets.
Process node
22 nm
This tablet is built on a 22 nm process node, which is larger than the node size used in 57.5% of tablets and equal to the node used in 7.2% of tablets.
Internal storage
512 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 512 GB which is larger than the storage of 92.4% of tablets and equal to that of 5.3% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
465 points
This tablet scored 465 points in Geekbench 6 (single-core) which is lower than the score of 59.9% of tablets and equal to the score of 0.1% of tablets.
Chipset
Intel Core i7-4650U
This tablet uses the Intel Core i7-4650U chipset, which is more advanced than the chipsets in 77.5% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
2160×1440
This tablet has a screen resolution of 2160×1440 which is higher than that of 67.8% of tablets and equal to that of 0.9% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
216 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 216 ppi which is lower than that of 52.1% of tablets and equal to that of 3.8% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass
This tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass display glass which is stronger than that on 45.4% of tablets and equal to that on 32.7% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
5 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 5 MP which is lower than that of 63.6% of tablets and equal to that of 26% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
5 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 5 MP which is higher than in 48.8% of tablets and equal to that in 19.6% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.4
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.4 which is narrower than that of 69.8% of tablets and equal to that of 17.6% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
5,547 mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 5,547 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 60.3% of tablets and equal to those in 0.1% of tablets.
Charging speed
36 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 36 W which is faster than in 79.3% of tablets and equal to speeds in 0.6% of tablets.
Battery life
9 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 9 hours, which is shorter than that of 62.7% of tablets and equal to that of 6.8% of tablets.
web browsing
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
no
This tablet does not support fast charging. 49.7% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
no
This tablet does not support LTE. 63.3% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
no
This tablet does not support GPS. 82.7% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Windows
This tablet uses the Windows operating system, which is less advanced than the one used by 84.1%.
Update support duration
long
This tablet offers long update support, which is longer than the support period of 80% of tablets and equal to that of 20% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
800 g
This tablet weighs 800 g which is heavier than 94.8% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.2% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
yes
This tablet supports a backlit keyboard. 90.3% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
45 ms
This tablet has a pen latency of 45 ms, which is higher than that of 97.7% of tablets and equal to that of 1.4% of tablets.
Show more
Number of microphones
2
This tablet includes 2 microphones, which is more than in 55.1% of tablets and equal to the number in 32.7% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Microsoft Surface Pro 3 (8GB + 512GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Intel Core i7-4650U chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Intel Core i7-4650U vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 8x more storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (512 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    512 GB vs 64 GB
  • 65% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (3.3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    3.3 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 1.9 inches larger screen size
    This tablet has a higher screen size than the average tablet (12 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    12 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 4 GB more RAM
    This tablet has more RAM capacity than the average tablet (8 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    8 GB vs 4 GB
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses SSD storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    SSD vs eMMC
  • 2x faster charging speed
    This tablet supports faster charging than the average tablet (36 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    36 W vs 18 W
  • Longer update support
    This tablet offers longer update support than the average tablet (long vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    long vs medium
  • 92.9% more popular
    Microsoft Surface Pro 3 (8GB + 512GB) is more popular than the average tablet (9.28 vs 4.8).
    9.28 vs 4.81
  • 6.3% higher user score
    User score
    8.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Microsoft Surface Pro 3
    the average tablet
    Microsoft Surface Pro 3 (8GB + 512GB) has a higher user score than the average tablet (8.51 vs 8.000).
    8.51 vs 8
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Intel Core i7-4650U chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Intel Core i7-4650U vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 8x more storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (512 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    512 GB vs 64 GB
  • 65% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (3.3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    3.3 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 4 GB more RAM
    This tablet has more RAM capacity than the average tablet (8 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    8 GB vs 4 GB
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses SSD storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    SSD vs eMMC
  • 36 more GPU execution units
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (40 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    40 vs 4
  • Supports multithreading
    This tablet supports multithreading, the average tablet does not. 0.00% of tablets support multithreading.
  • 71.8% higher memory bandwidth
    This tablet has a higher memory bandwidth than the average tablet (25.6 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    25.6 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 1.9 inches larger screen size
    This tablet has a higher screen size than the average tablet (12 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    12 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Higher screen resolution
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (2160×1440 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920×1200.
    2160×1440 vs 1920×1200
  • 200 Hz higher PWM dimming frequency
    This tablet has a higher PWM dimming frequency than the average tablet (200 Hz vs 0 Hz). The average tablet has PWM dimming frequency of 0 Hz.
    Below 48% brightness only.
    200 Hz vs 0 Hz
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This tablet has a better front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 front camera aperture.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • 2x faster charging speed
    This tablet supports faster charging than the average tablet (36 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    36 W vs 18 W
  • Includes battery health monitoring
    This tablet features battery health monitoring, the average tablet does not. 37% of tablets include battery health tools.
  • Longer update support
    This tablet offers longer update support than the average tablet (long vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    long vs medium
  • Includes stylus
    This tablet includes a stylus, the average tablet does not. 16.9% of tablets come with a stylus.
  • Suitable for drawing
    This tablet is suitable for drawing, the average tablet is not. 41% of tablets are suitable for drawing.
  • Includes backlit keyboard
    This tablet has a backlit keyboard, the average tablet does not. 9.8% of tablets offer a backlit keyboard.
  • 1 more microphone/s
    This tablet has more microphones than the average tablet (2 vs 1). The average tablet has 1 microphones.
    2 vs 1
  • No USB Type-C
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • No LTE support
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • 63.3% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (800 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    800 g vs 490 g
  • 3 MP lower main camera megapixels
    This tablet has a lower-resolution main camera than the average tablet (5 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a 8 MP main camera.
    5 MP vs 8 MP
  • No touch autofocus
    This tablet does not support touch autofocus, the average tablet does. 82.8% of tablets allow touch-to-focus.
  • No HDR photo mode
    This tablet does not have HDR photo mode, the average tablet does. 79.6% of tablets support HDR photo mode.
  • 2 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    4 vs 6
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    This tablet does not use a big.LITTLE architecture, the average tablet does. 51.3% of tablets use a big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 57.1% larger process node
    This tablet uses a larger process node than the average tablet (22 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    22 nm vs 14 nm
  • 36.2% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score than the average tablet (465 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    465 points vs 729 points
  • 266 MHz slower RAM speed
    This tablet has a lower RAM speed than the average tablet (1,600 MHz vs 1,866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1,866 MHz.
    1,600 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • 30 nits lower peak brightness
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (371 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    371 nits vs 401 nits
  • 29 nits lower typical brightness
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (371 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    371 nits vs 400 nits
  • 3.6% lower pixel density
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (216 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    216 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • 3 MP lower main camera megapixels
    This tablet has a lower-resolution main camera than the average tablet (5 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a 8 MP main camera.
    5 MP vs 8 MP
  • No touch autofocus
    This tablet does not support touch autofocus, the average tablet does. 82.8% of tablets allow touch-to-focus.
  • No HDR photo mode
    This tablet does not have HDR photo mode, the average tablet does. 79.6% of tablets support HDR photo mode.
  • No manual white balance
    This tablet does not allow manual white balance adjustments, the average tablet does. 51.6% of tablets include white balance controls.
  • No BSI sensor
    This tablet lacks a BSI sensor, the average tablet has one. 52.6% of tablets use BSI sensors for better low-light shots.
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    This tablet has a worse main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.4 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 main camera aperture.
    f/2.4 vs f/2.2
  • 1 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (9 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    web browsing
    9 hours vs 10 hours
  • 15.7% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a lower battery capacity than the average tablet (5,547 mAh vs 6,580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6,580 mAh.
    5,547 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • No USB Type-C
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • No LTE support
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • No GPS
    This tablet does not have GPS, the average tablet does. 82.7% of tablets feature GPS.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This tablet uses an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    4.0 vs 5.0
  • No cellular module
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • No face recognition
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56% of tablets support face recognition.
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • 63.3% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (800 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    800 g vs 490 g
  • 36 ms higher pen latency
    This tablet has higher pen latency than the average tablet (45 ms vs 9 ms). The average tablet has pen latency of 9 ms.
    45 ms vs 9 ms
  • 116.7 mm wider
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (292 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    292 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • 3 points lower iFixit repairability score
    This tablet has a lower repairability score than the average tablet (1 points vs 4 points). The average tablet repairability score is 4 points.
    1 points vs 4 points
  • 1.1 mm thicker
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (9.1 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    9.1 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • 5 older release date
    This tablet is an older model than the average tablet (2014 vs 2019).
    2014 vs 2019

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

C
cnet.com
22/05/2014
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
22/05/2014
Summary of the review
T
theverge.com
20/05/2014
Summary of the review
T
time.com
11/07/2014
Summary of the review
I
ign.com
18/07/2014
Summary of the review
E
expertreviews.co.uk
06/08/2014
Summary of the review
M
mobiletechreview.com
07/07/2014
Summary of the review
R
reviewed.com
12/06/2014
Summary of the review
T
t3.com
11/08/2014
Summary of the review
T
techwalls.com
12/11/2014
Summary of the review
V
voices.britishschool.nl
16/03/2017
Summary of the review
P
photographylife.com
12/11/2015
Summary of the review
T
theverge.com
23/05/2014
Summary of the review
T
techadvisor.com
22/01/2016
Summary of the review
S
stuff.tv
31/07/2014
Summary of the review
C
cnet.com
21/06/2014
Summary of the review
C
cnet.com
30/07/2014
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
22/05/2014
Summary of the review
H
huffingtonpost.co.uk
21/08/2014
Summary of the review
E
engadget.com
29/05/2014
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: November 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Microsoft Surface Pro 3 (8GB + 512GB)

  • High-resolution 12-inch display (2160x1440) with excellent clarity and sharp text
  • Versatile, infinitely adjustable full-friction kickstand
  • Pressure-sensitive Surface Pen included for natural writing and note-taking
  • Strong performance for productivity tasks and casual usage
  • Lightweight and thinner design compared to previous Surface Pro generations
  • Impressive front and back webcams for video calls

What customers don't like about Microsoft Surface Pro 3 (8GB + 512GB)

  • Type Cover keyboard is sold separately and is considered an essential but expensive accessory
  • Limited connectivity with only one USB 3.0 port
  • Poor gaming and heavy video editing performance due to integrated graphics
  • Can be bulky and heavy for one-handed use as a standalone tablet
  • Kickstand design can be uncomfortable or unstable when used on a lap
  • Inconsistent internet connectivity and reported software bugs
  • Flimsy integrated pen storage (pen loop)

Verdict

The Microsoft Surface Pro 3 (8GB + 512GB) is a premium 2-in-1 tablet designed to replace a laptop, featuring a 4th generation Intel Core i7 processor, 8GB of LPDDR3 RAM, and 512GB of SSD storage. It boasts a 12-inch ClearType Full HD Plus display with a 2160 x 1440 resolution and a 3:2 aspect ratio that is ideal for productivity, all encased in a slim magnesium shell weighing just 800g. Main pros include its highly versatile multi-position kickstand, pressure-sensitive Surface Pen support, and high-resolution screen with excellent color accuracy. However, notable cons include the high cost of the essential Type Cover keyboard (sold separately), limited connectivity with only one USB 3.0 port, and potential thermal throttling during intensive tasks due to its thin fan-cooled design.

Compare Microsoft Surface Pro 3 (8GB + 512GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Microsoft Surface Pro 3 (8GB + 512GB) and other tablets

No results found